Showing posts with label RNC. Show all posts
Showing posts with label RNC. Show all posts

Friday, October 10, 2025

Massacre of the Buffalo Soldiers

THE RNC HAS A LONG HISTORY OF DISENFRANCHISING BLACK VOTERS! 

 


June 16, 2004

African-American Voters Scrubbed by Secret GOP Hit List
by Greg Palast
As reported for Democracy Now!
 
Palast, who first reported this story for BBC Television Newsnight (UK) and Democracy Now! (USA), is author of the New York Times bestseller, Armed Madhouse.
 
The Republican National Committee has a special offer for African-American soldiers:  Go to Baghdad, lose your vote.
 
A confidential campaign directed by GOP party chiefs in October 2004 sought to challenge the ballots of tens of thousands of voters in the last presidential election, virtually all of them cast by residents of Black-majority precincts.
Files from the secret vote-blocking campaign were obtained by BBC Television Newsnight, London.  They were attached to emails accidentally sent by Republican operatives to a non-party website.
 
One group of voters wrongly identified by the Republicans as registering to vote from false addresses:  servicemen and women sent overseas.
 
*******
For Greg Palast's discussion with broadcaster Amy Goodman on the Black soldier purge of 2004, go to http://gregpalast.com/armedmadhouse/palastDN6-14-06.mp3

*******
 
Here's how the scheme worked:  The RNC mailed these voters letters in envelopes marked, “Do not forward”, to be returned to the sender. These letters were mailed to servicemen and women, some stationed overseas, to their US home addresses.  The letters then returned to the Bush-Cheney campaign as "undeliverable."
 
The lists of soldiers of "undeliverable" letters were transmitted from state headquarters, in this case Florida, to the RNC in Washington. The party could then challenge the voters' registration and thereby prevent their absentee ballot being counted.
 
One target list was comprised exclusively of voters registered at the Jacksonville, Florida, Naval Air Station. Jacksonville is third largest naval installation in the US, best known as home of the Blue Angels fighting squandron.
 

 
[See this scrub sheet at http://flickr.com/photo_zoom.gne?id=160156893&context=set-72157594155273706&size=o ]
 
Our team contacted the homes of several on the caging list, such as Randall Prausa, a serviceman, whose wife said he had been ordered overseas.
 
A soldier returning home in time to vote in November 2004 could also be challenged on the basis of the returned envelope.  Soldiers challenged would be required to vote by "provisional" ballot.
 
Over one million provisional ballots cast in the 2004 race were never counted; over half a million absentee ballots were also rejected. The extraordinary rise in the number of rejected ballots was the result of the widespread multi-state voter challenge campaign by the Republican Party.  The operation, of which the purge of Black soldiers was a small part, was the first mass challenge to voting America had seen in two decades.
 
The BBC obtained several dozen confidential emails sent by the Republican's  national Research Director and Deputy Communications chief, Tim Griffin to GOP Florida campaign chairman Brett Doster and other party leaders. Attached were spreadsheets marked, "Caging.xls."  Each of these contained several hundred to a few thousand voters and their addresses.
 
A check of the demographics of the addresses on the "caging lists," as the GOP leaders called them indicated that most were in African-American majority zip codes.
 
Ion Sanco, the non-partisan elections supervisor of Leon County (Tallahassee) when shown the lists by this reporter said: “The only thing I can think of  - African American voters listed like this – these might be individuals that will be challenged if they attempted to vote on Election Day.”
 
These GOP caging lists were obtained by the same BBC team that first exposed the wrongful purge of African-American "felon" voters in 2000 by then-Secretary of State Katherine Harris.  Eliminating the voting rights of those voters -- 94,000 were targeted -- likely caused Al Gore's defeat in that race.
 

The Republican National Committee in Washington refused our several requests to respond to the BBC discovery.  However, in Tallahassee, the Florida Bush campaign's spokespeople offered several explanations for the list.
 
Joseph Agostini, speaking for the GOP, suggested the lists were of potential donors to the Bush campaign. Oddly, the supposed donor list included residents of the Sulzbacher Center a shelter for homeless families.
 
Another spokesperson for the Bush campaign, Mindy Tucker Fletcher, ultimately changed the official response, acknowledging that these were voters, "we mailed to, where the letter came back – bad addresses.”
 
The party has refused to say why it would mark soldiers as having "bad addresses" subject to challenge when they had been assigned abroad.

The apparent challenge campaign was not inexpensive.  The GOP mailed the letters first class, at a total cost likely exceeding millions of dollars, so that the addresses would be returned to "cage" workers.
 
“This is not a challenge list," insisted the Republican spokesmistress. However, she modified that assertion by adding, “That’s not what it’s set up to be.”
Setting up such a challenge list would be a crime under federal law.  The Voting Rights Act of 1965 outlaws mass challenges of voters where race is a factor in choosing the targeted group.
 
While the party insisted the lists were not created for the purpose to challenge Black voters, the GOP ultimately offered no other explanation for the mailings.  However, Tucker Fletcher asserted Republicans could still employ the list to deny ballots to those they considered suspect voters.  When asked if Republicans would use the list to block voters, Tucker Fletcher replied, “Where it’s stated in the law, yeah.”
 
It is not possible at this time to determine how many on the potential blacklist were ultimately challenged and lost their vote.  Soldiers sending in their ballot from abroad would not know their vote was lost because of a challenge.
 
 
__________________________________
 
For the full story of caging lists and voter purges of 2004, plus the documents, read Greg Palast's New York Times bestseller, ARMED MADHOUSE:  Who's Afraid of Osama Wolf?, Armed Madhouse:  Who's Afraid of Osama Wolf?, China Floats Bush Sinks, the Scheme to Steal '08, No Child's Behind Left and other Dispatches from the Front Lines of the Class War.
 

Tuesday, July 29, 2025

DOJ said to plan to ask all 50 states for voter data

 


Thursday, December 12, 2024

The most litigated election ever CORPORATE MEDIA IS NOT REPORTING THIS!

 

It has become common to identify ways in which Donald Trump has distorted our democracy. His attacks on judges, his willful disregard for rule of law and his insistence on appointing unqualified sycophants to positions of high office are all a matter of consternation and commentary.

His greatest damage has been to the electoral process itself. Prior to the 2020 election, he unleashed a torrent of lies about voting and election security. When he lost, he tried in vain to overturn the results of free and fair elections via the courts. When that failed, he instigated a violent insurrection to try to prevent the counting of the Electoral College results in Congress.

Following his defeat, Trump was not just unrepentant but radicalized by his humiliating defeat. His handpicked lawyers — Guiliani, Powell, Ellis — had become punchlines and criminal defendants. Even election deniers became fringe conspiracists, akin to flat earth advocates, and Trump embraced them more tightly. He wanted his revenge, not only in the public arena, but also in the courtroom.

Meanwhile, Republicans saw political advantages to embracing Trump’s crackpot theories. It enabled them to enact massive voter suppression laws in 2021 and afterwards. These laws targeted key elements of the Democratic coalition, while also drawing in skeptical Republican voters.

As we approached the 2024 election, the stage was set for an unprecedented wave of voting and election litigation to sweep across the country. Thanks to a recent report from Democracy Docket, we now know the size, depth and contours of that wave.

From Jan. 1, 2023, through Election Day 2024, there were 306 voting and election lawsuits filed across 45 states. In 2024 alone, there were 228 lawsuits. To put this in perspective, in 2020 — when Republicans falsely claimed my team and I were indiscriminately filing lawsuits throughout the country — there were 82 total cases.

In fact, in a change from the past, it was the GOP that showed the sharpest increase in its litigation docket. At several key junctures during the campaign, Trump made clear that voter suppression was his top priority for the party’s spending. He even replaced the Republican National Committee chair in part because he found her insufficiently committed to filing anti-voting litigation.

As the new report notes: “After filing only six lawsuits in 2020, the RNC filed 24 lawsuits in 2024 and engaged in 18% of all lawsuits this cycle. The Trump campaign itself filed five lawsuits.” When you look at the broader GOP, the numbers are even more stark. More than half of all 158 anti-voting lawsuits filed this cycle were brought by some part of the Republican Party.

By contrast, the Democratic Party accounted for only 17% of the pro-voting docket, with progressive nonprofits and groups accounting for nearly 70% of the total caseload. The DNC filed nine cases while the presidential campaigns of Joe Biden and Kamala Harris filed none.

The good news is that despite the sharp increase in litigation, pro-voting forces continued to win, notching three times as many victories as losses with most of those victories coming in the presidential battleground states.

So, what do we make of this?

First, we should be pleased that, once again, the courts largely rejected GOP attacks on our election systems. As imperfect as they are, at a time when Republics control the presidency and both chambers of Congress, the courts will remain the most powerful tool to prevent Trump from undermining our democracy and rule of law.

Second, we need to recognize that litigation is now a part of the process of our elections. We are not going back to the days where the courts were spectators in the electoral process. Both sides have learned that the rules of voting matter — to voters and, in some instances, to outcomes. It is difficult to look at the results of the U.S. Senate race in Pennsylvania and the ongoing litigation in the North Carolina state Supreme Court race and draw any other conclusion.

Third, both political parties and nonprofits have a role to play in protecting voting rights. Republicans came into 2024 with a clear plan to use litigation to reinforce Donald Trump’s false claims and to change the rules to benefit his campaign. A constellation of right-wing groups followed suit. The Democratic Party took a different approach. The result was that pro-voting non-party groups and organizations were forced to bear an enormous load of cases to ensure a free and fair election.

Finally, we need to realize that there is no off-season for protecting voting rights. The fight for fair voting rules takes place every month of every year, period.

One final statistic. Right now — at the quietest point in any election cycle — there are 194 active voting and election cases pending in 40 states. They are evenly split between pro-voting and anti-voting lawsuits. More than 20 such cases are pending in Pennsylvania and Georgia. Arizona, North Carolina, Texas and Wisconsin each have more than 10.

This is the new reality of democracy. Election denialism isn’t going away nor is voter suppression. Litigation is a feature, not an exception of modern elections. If we are to be successful at winning elections and preserving democracy, that is the lesson we must learn and carry forward into the new year.

Members always receive premium content like this with exclusive analysis. Consider upgrading for $120/year to continue receiving my insights on the current political landscape straight to your inbox.

Saturday, November 23, 2024

How Trump could use recess appointments

 


Friday, November 22

For $120/year, upgrade to our premium membership and support a pro-democracy news outlet dedicated to keeping you up to date on voting, elections and democracy in the courts.

How Trump could use recess appointments to undermine democracy

  • As some of President-elect Donald Trump's cabinet nominees provoke ire, Trump is considering using recess appointments to skirt Senate confirmation votes. How do recess appointments work? And is it a threat to democracy? Read here to learn the answers to these questions.

Casey concedes to McCormick in Pennsylvania Senate race

  • Pennsylvania ended its U.S. Senate recount after Sen. Bob Casey (D) conceded to David McCormick (R). A handful of lawsuits regarding ballot rejections in the race remain open as of Friday but may be withdrawn following Casey's concession.


  • “This race was one of the closest in our Commonwealth’s history, decided by less than a quarter of a point,” Casey said. “I am grateful to the thousands of people who worked to make sure every eligible vote cast could be counted, including election officials in all 67 counties.”

RNC dismisses challenge to Michigan’s expanded voter registration sites

  • The Republican National Committee voluntarily dismissed its lawsuit alleging that Michigan violated federal law by offering voter registration at Small Business Administration and Veterans Affairs offices.

Trump announces election denier Pam Bondi as new AG pick

  • Who is Pam Bondi, Trump's new pick for U.S. attorney general? The former Florida state AG defended the President-elect during his first impeachment trial, spread lies about the 2020 election and led a multi-state effort to overturn pro-voting policies. Read here to learn more.


  • Since 2021, Bondi has been the chair of the America First Policy Institute’s center for litigation and co-chair of its center for law and justice. Bondi has spearheaded the group’s efforts to disenfranchise voters around the country.


  • Trump announced Bondi just one day after his previous pick for attorney general, Matt Gaetz, withdrew his name from consideration, saying his nomination had become a “distraction.”

Bondi could lead Trump’s DOJ — here’s how it could affect voting rights

  • How will a Trump DOJ run by loyalists and possibly purged of career attorneys impact voting rights? Looking at its record during Trump’s first term could provide an indication of what’s to come.

Top News | 'He’s Not Going to Run Unopposed': Sanders Rejects Schumer for Majority Leader

                                                               LOTS OF POSTS IGNORED BY BLOGGER..... OR REMOVED ON THEIR WHIM! ALL POSTS ARE...