Showing posts with label CLIFTON MCHALE. Show all posts
Showing posts with label CLIFTON MCHALE. Show all posts

Friday, January 29, 2021

VIDEO: COP WHO BRAGGED THAT HE HIT PROTESTERS SHOWS HOW BAD APPLES THRIVE IN BOSTON

VIDEO: COP WHO BRAGGED THAT HE HIT PROTESTERS SHOWS HOW BAD APPLES THRIVE IN BOSTON


 WRITTEN BY 

FILED UNDER: NEWSNEWS TO USNEWS+OPINIONSOP-ED



The woman later told police that he assaulted her, while “McHale had maintained that any contact between himself and the woman was consensual.”


I’m no fan of Boston’s newspaper of record, but unlike the Boston Globe, I give credit where it’s due, and this week props go to one Dugan Arnett, who broke the story, “Boston police sergeant who bragged about hitting George Floyd protesters with car was previously accused of sexual assault.”

You read that correctly. From Arnett’s reporting

The Boston police sergeant mired in recent controversy over video footage showing him bragging about intentionally striking protesters with his vehicle is a veteran supervisor with a troubled, complicated past on the police force, according to two people briefed on the matter.

Clifton McHale, a 23-year Boston Police Department veteran with family ties to the department’s upper ranks, was accused in 2005 of sexually assaulting an intoxicated woman while in uniform in a police vehicle and agreed to serve a one-year, unpaid suspension following an investigation.

That video in question of course came from the national outlet The Appeal and reporting released last month by journalist Eoin Higgins, which showed Boston “police officers bragging about attacking protesters and multiple instances of excessive force and the liberal use of pepper spray.” From that bombshell:

As demonstrations against police brutality and abuse of Black Americans spread across Boston on the night of May 31 and early morning of June 1, the city’s police department was out in force. Many officers wore body cameras. During the unrest, the cameras recorded hours of footage that the department subsequently stored. 

That footage was given to attorney Carl Williams, who is representing some protesters arrested that night, as part of a discovery file encompassing 44 videos and over 66 hours of footage. Williams assembled a team of volunteer lawyers and law students to pore over the videos to find exculpatory evidence for his clients. What they found, however, was something more. 

The hours of video, given exclusively to The Appeal by Williams, show police officers bragging about attacking protesters, targeting nonviolent demonstrators for violence and possible arrest, discussing arrest quotas and the use of cars as weapons, and multiple instances of excessive force and liberal use of pepper spray.

More on that shortly, but first, you probably want to hear more about the cop who was caught bragging on camera about hitting protesters, and then tried to reverse his story. As reports from the Globe and other outlets at the time show, back in 2005, McHale was working a detail near Faneuil Hall “when he offered a woman he’d met a ride to her hotel in his unmarked police cruiser.” He reportedly took her into an alley. The woman later told police that he assaulted her, while “McHale had maintained that any contact between himself and the woman was consensual.” More from the Globe:

A year later, McHale agreed with the department to accept a one-year, unpaid suspension after an internal investigation concluded that he had engaged in “inappropriate sexual relations with the highly intoxicated woman,” the Globe reported at the time. Additionally, McHale acknowledged violating rules on take-home police vehicles and failing to properly secure his weapon. Following the suspension, McHale — whose father is a former Boston police deputy superintendent — returned to the department and was later promoted to sergeant.

Just another bad apple, ya know? 

According to wokewindows.org, an amazing resource that compiles available police data including internal affairs files, McHale has “at least one sustained allegation, and 3 cases total, regardless of finding.” The Internal Affairs Division has found him “in violation of policies including Untruthfulness, Securing and Maintenance of Firearm, Neg.Duty/Unreasonable Judge, and Conduct Unbecoming.”

Now, you might still be scratching your head, wondering, Are cops really allowed to have sex with drunken people who they offered to take home? What about with people they arrest? In short, yes and no, or really it depends on when it happened. The woman who McHale “engaged in inappropriate sexual relations with” was not in custody, but if she had been, there was no law against it at the time. DigBoston was the first to report that—in an article by Kori Feener back in March 2018. She quoted Peter Manning, who teaches at the School of Criminology and Criminal Justice at Northeastern University, saying the loophole in the Massachusetts law “is striking.” 

“I personally doubt that there is any toleration [for such acts]—it might be something that is overlooked,” Manning said. “When people talk about the thin blue line, what they mean is someone might overlook this behavior, not want to know or talk about it. Though they may know some are engaged in this kind of activity, there is a failure to recognize it.”

Thankfully, Newton state Rep. Kay Khan, along with Somerville state Sen. Pat Jehlen and other lawmakers did recognize the problem, and drafted “legislation that addresses the existing loophole by prohibiting officers from engaging in sexual conduct with those in their custody, supervision, or with whom they interact in the course of their professional duties.” It took nearly three years, but that effort was eventually folded into the police reform bill that Gov. Charlie Baker just signed into law on New Year’s Eve. The legislation includes the language:

A law enforcement officer who commits an indecent assault and battery on a person who has attained the age of 14 and who is in the custody or control of such law enforcement officer shall be punished by imprisonment in the state prison for not more than 5 years, or by imprisonment for not more than 2½ years in a jail or house of correction. In a prosecution commenced under this subsection, a person shall be deemed incapable of consent to contact of a sexual nature with a law enforcement officer.

As for the Boston police, there are some new reforms in place there as well, and some are potentially quite promising, not to mention the work of police reform advocates who have worked on these issues for years and know all the pitfalls.

Still, it’s Boston. Even with these revelations, and appeals from the community, Mayor Marty Walsh last week still expressed confidence in the department. All things considered, I’m guessing that makes him the last person in Boston who doesn’t have a Blue Lives Matter sign in their window who still believes that.

LINK




Friday, January 1, 2021

Suffolk DA Rachael Rollins releases list of police officers with ‘questionable’ credibility

 


Suffolk DA Rachael Rollins releases list of police officers with ‘questionable’ credibility

"When the credibility of law enforcement is in question, all participants in the system – and the public – should be aware of that."

 
Suffolk County District Attorney Rachael Rollins 

Suffolk County District Attorney Rachael Rollins Friday night released a list of 136 area police officers who have been accused of misconduct, corruption, or other problematic behavior that would disrupt their credibility as witnesses in the court room.

Personnel included in the Law Enforcement Automatic Discovery, or LEAD, database span multiple jurisdictions and departments and include current and former officers in Boston, Chelsea, and Revere police, Massachusetts State Police, and MBTA Transit Police, the document shows. One IRS officer and one Special Police Officer are also included.

According to Rollins’ office, Friday’s announcement follows an expansion and revision of the database, during which names of 115 officers “whose credibility is questionable” were added within the past year.

Rollins, in a statement, said the list is a crucial component of her office’s Integrity Review Bureau.

“As members of law enforcement, we are held to a higher standard. We in law enforcement cannot adequately perform our duties if the community does not trust us or believes that we lack integrity. That does nothing to keep our communities safe; to solve crimes; and to foster, cultivate, and build mutual trust and respect between the police and the people and communities they serve,” Rollins said. “The LEAD database will help us ensure that the legal process works and people charged with crimes by our office receive all of the information they are entitled to in order to properly defend themselves. The constitution requires as much.”

Prosecutors must provide defendants evidence that can be favorable to their defense under the 1963 Supreme Court ruling in Brady v. Maryland. Maintaining a list of officers who engaged in misconduct is typical process for many prosecutors, The Boston Globe reports.

“If testimony provided by prosecution witnesses is suspect then the criminal legal system itself is suspect,” Rollins added. “All of us in law enforcement must be beyond reproach because what we do impacts matters of life, death, and freedom for the general public.”

Officers on the list include those who “work, have worked, or could work in Suffolk County,” according to Rollins’ office.

Individuals can be added to the LEAD database for a variety of reasons, including if an officer was: investigated or prosecuted for a crime; investigated based on “discriminatory or defamatory actions, language or conduct;” or investigated by an agency’s internal affairs or anti-corruption units, “casting doubt upon truthfulness or integrity,” prosecutors said.

Personnel can also be included on the list based off “a finding in any jurisdiction by a judge, an administrative agency, review board, or any oversight entity created by the legislature, federal, state, county, local or municipal elected official(s), or the like, that the individual employed by a law enforcement agency is not credible,” officials said.

“This is a living document,’’ Rollins said. “Names will be added to it, when, for example we are made aware of an investigation or any of the other entry criteria, and names can come off if an investigation exonerates someone, or an appeal is sustained.’’

The database currently contains 70 Massachusetts State Police troopers, 54 Boston Police Department members, five Transit police officers, three Revere police officers, and two Chelsea police officers.

Twenty officers on the list were convicted of crimes and another 24 were indicted. Officers may appeal their inclusion on the list to Rollins’ office.

The City of Boston, Boston police, Massachusetts State Police, and other agencies with officers named in the database did not immediately return requests for comment Saturday.

“The overwhelming majority of law enforcement officers and employees in Suffolk County are dedicated and compassionate professionals who provide exemplary service to the communities they serve. The database is not voluminous, but the actions of the officers within LEAD are harmful, or potentially harmful to the community and the criminal legal system,” Rollins said. “When the credibility of law enforcement is in question, all participants in the system – and the public – should be aware of that. The people of Suffolk County deserve to know that the public officials they rely on for their safety are truly invested in it. Anything less is a betrayal of their trust and our obligation to serve.”

Read the full list.


LINK

Report: Boston police sergeant who said he hit people with car during protests was accused of sexual assault in 2005

The sergeant's remarks were caught on body camera video footage collected during protests earlier this year.


Boston Police Sergeant Clifton McHale testified in the double murder trial of former New England Patriots tight end Aaron Hernandez in Suffolk Superior Court in July 2017. 

Boston Police Sergeant Clifton McHale testified in the double murder 
trial of former New England Patriots tight end Aaron Hernandez in Suffolk 
Superior Court in July 2017. –Pat Greenhouse / The Boston Globe


, Boston.com Staff

A Boston police sergeant who was captured on body camera video footage talking about hitting people with a car during demonstrations against police brutality in the spring was previously accused of sexually assaulting a woman 15 years ago, The Boston Globe reported Wednesday.

Clifton McHale, who has served on the force for 23 years, was accused of the assault in 2005 and later agreed to serve a one-year, unpaid suspension after an internal investigation, according to the newspaper.

McHale has not been identified by city or department officials as the sergeant who made the remarks on camera during the May 31 and June 1 overnight protests, which were spurred by the killing of George Floyd, who died in police custody in Minneapolis. The Globe, however, cites “two people briefed on the matter” who identified McHale in its report.

“Dude, I f***ing drove down Tremont (Street),” McHale said in the body camera video while standing near Downtown Crossing. “There was an unmarked state police cruiser they were all gathered around …Then I had a f***er keep coming, f***ing running. I’m f***ing hitting people with the car.”

The video was among several unearthed from the night and published by The Appeal earlier this month. In others, officers are seen using force against nonviolent protesters and pepper-spraying crowds.

Collectively, the clips have sparked controversy and prompted calls for investigation into police behavior at a time when both local and state officials have worked to create new mechanisms of holding law enforcement transparent and accountable.

According to Boston police officials, the department has launched an internal investigation based off the videos and has placed a sergeant involved on administrative leave. The department has not identified the sergeant and have not indicated whether the sergeant seen on video is the one who is now on leave.

In its report, the Globe said McHale was 32 years old when he was accused of sexually assaulting an intoxicated woman.

On July 17, 2005, McHale was in uniform and working a paid detail at The Purple Shamrock near Faneuil Hall when he offered to drive a woman he met to her hotel in an unmarked police cruiser, according to the Globe.

McHale, however, stopped in an alleyway instead of heading directly to the hotel, according to an internal police investigation cited by the newspaper.

The woman reported to authorities that she passed out and found McHale assaulting her when she came to, the Globe reported.

At the time, Thomas Drechsler, an attorney representing McHale, told the Associated Press McHale denied any wrongdoing and was “absolutely innocent,” and a Globe report stated McHale maintained the incident was consensual.

Prosecutors considered charging McHale, but ultimately decided against doing so due to insufficient evidence, according to the Globe.

Still, McHale agreed a year later to accept a one-year suspension from the force when an internal investigation found that he had “inappropriate sexual relations with the highly intoxicated woman,” the newspaper wrote at the time. McHale also acknowledged he broke department rules regarding the take-home police vehicle and failed to secure his weapon properly.

McHale later returned to the department and went on to be promoted to sergeant, the Globe reported.

His father is a former Boston police deputy superintendent.

In the body camera video, McHale is seen describing hitting people with a car before the officer equipped with the camera pushes the sergeant’s face away from the lens, turns, and walks away from him.

The officer looks back and says, “This (thing) is on.”

McHale replies: “Oh, no no no, I know, what I’m saying is, though, that they were in front, like, I didn’t hit anybody, like, just driving. They’re throwing s***. My windows were closed, the s*** was coming in.”

According to the Globe, attempts to reach McHale for comment were not successful, and a family member directed questions to the police department. The Boston Police Superior Officers Federation, a union representing sergeants, did not return messages from the newspaper.

Mayor Marty Walsh defended the department last week.

On Wednesday, Walsh said he could not identify the officers in the videos and cited the ongoing investigation.

“I’m very confident that … the Boston Police Department can police themself,” Walsh said during a press conference, adding that officials are working to establish the Office of Police Accountability and Transparency (OPAT), an agency that would be charged with investigating allegations of police misconduct.

The Boston City Council passed an ordinance earlier this month to create OPAT. Walsh, whose administration worked on the legislation after receiving recommendations from the Police Reform Task Force, has said he is reviewing the measure.

“All of that is work that we’ve been working on for a long time,” Walsh said. “But obviously, the sense of urgency this year has stepped up in a different way since the killing of George Floyd. And I’m proud of the task force the work they’ve done. I’m proud of the work that we continue to do here.

“I mean, I think that there’s going to be individual cases all, you know, with the police department here in Boston and around the country, there’s gonna be individual cases in different areas, that we’re going to have been watching and monitoring closely,” he added.

The videos were given to The Appeal by attorney Carl Williams, who is representing four people arrested by police that night.

Authorities made 53 arrests during the protests, 18 bystanders were hospitalized, and nine officers were treated for nonlife-threatening injuries.

Williams told the Globe on Tuesday McHale’s conduct was disturbing.

“I’d say there’s a pattern of behavior here,” Williams said. “There’s a lot of things going on that make you say, ‘Not a great employee.’ It’s worrisome.”

LINK






Trump's Friday Meltdown: Begging Iran, Ditching Ukraine, and Blaming Everybody But Himself – 7/31/26

                                               LOTS OF POSTS IGNORED BY BLOGGER..... OR REMOVED ON THEIR WHIM! ALL POSTS ARE AVAILABLE ON MI...