UNDER CONSTRUCTION - MOVED TO MIDDLEBORO REVIEW AND SO ON https://middlebororeviewandsoon.blogspot.com/
A bombshell report from the Insider details a new 911 call involving Lauren Boebert's family. Meidas Contributor Coach D reacts.
FROM THE BOSTON GLOBE:
Today's US coronavirus / COVID-19 numbers in the US
|
Hmm. I think this is another "Please read a book" moment.
|
The Friday-Saturday Donation Desert
Fridays and Saturdays especially in the spring and summer are the worst for donations. People want to get out and do things, which is understandable, but RSN’s fundraising efforts take a big hit.
Donating only takes a few seconds and it really helps us do this.
Who?
Marc Ash
Founder, Reader Supported News
If you would prefer to send a check:
Reader Supported News
PO Box 2043
Citrus Hts, CA 95611
It's Live on the HomePage Now:
Reader Supported News
FOCUS: Bess Levin | Brett Kavanaugh Rules Children Deserve Life in Prison With No Chance of Parole
Bess Levin, Vanity Fair
Levin writes: "The Trump-appointee who asked not to be judged by his high school year book has a different point of view for kids who aren't Tobin, Squi, and PJ."
n September 2018, in between screaming about his love of beer and crying over his love of calendars, Brett Kavanaugh told the Senate Judiciary Committee: “If we want to sit here and talk about whether a Supreme Court nomination should be based on a high school yearbook page, I think that’s taken us to a new level of absurdity.” In fact, lawmakers that day weren’t deciding whether or not to confirm Kavanaugh to the highest court in the land based on “a high school yearbook page” but over credible allegations of sexual assault, which he denied. Nevertheless, Kavanaugh’s position that day was that people shouldn’t be held accountable for things they do as minors. But what he apparently actually meant was that he shouldn’t be held accountable for things he allegedly did as kid, while others deserve life in prison without the possibility of parole.
On Thursday, in a 6–3 decision authored by Kavanaugh, the Supreme Court decided that judges need not determine that a juvenile convicted of a crime is incapable of being rehabilitated before sentencing him or her to life in prison without the possibility of parole. The “argument that the sentencer must make a finding of permanent incorrigibility is inconsistent with the Court’s precedents,” Kavanaugh claimed, which actually isn’t true at all. (As Slate’s Mark Joseph Stern notes, the landmark Miller v. Alabama and Montgomery v. Louisiana decisions determined, respectively, that juvenile life without parole violate the 8th Amendment and that sentences imposed at a judge’s discretion are generally unconstitutional.) The ruling resulted in the court upholding a life-without-parole sentence that a Mississippi court imposed on Brett Jones, a then 15-year-old who stabbed his grandfather to death.
In a scathing dissent, joined by Justices Stephen Breyer and Elena Kagan, Justice Sonia Sotomayor responded that “the Court,” i.e. Kavanaugh and his fellow conservatives, “simply rewrites Miller and Montgomery to say what the Court now wishes they had said, and then denies that it has done any such thing. The Court knows what it is doing.” Sotomayor also reminds those reading that Jones was “the victim of violence and neglect that he was too young to escape,” with an alcoholic biological father who abused his mother and a stepfather who abused him with “belts, switches, and a paddle” and openly declared his hatred for Jones. When, per Sotomayor, Jones moved in with his grandfather—who abused him as well—he abruptly lost access to medications he was prescribed for mental health issues, including hallucinations. In 2004, when his grandfather tried to hit him, Jones says he stabbed him in self-defense.
According to NPR, Thursday was the first time in nearly two decades that the Supreme Court “deviated from rules establishing more leniency for juvenile offenders, even those convicted of murder,” noting that the court, “primed by research that shows the brains of juveniles are not fully developed, and that they are likely to lack impulse control—has issued a half dozen opinions holding that juveniles are less culpable than adults for their acts.”
As Stern writes, the Court’s “decision will prevent hundreds of other juvenile defendants from securing early release. And as Sotomayor pointed out, the burden will fall disproportionately on racial minorities,” as 70% of all youths sentenced to life without parole are children of color. Too bad these kids aren’t afforded the same policy high school Brett Kavanaugh got!
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
GOOD MORNING, MASSACHUSETTS. TGIF!
THE BATTLE FOR THE PROGRESSIVES — Sen. Ed Markey is touting an endorsement from Progressive Mass this morning, a statewide group that says 96 percent of its members prefer him to Rep. Joe Kennedy III.
Beyond being a boost for Markey, the progressive endorsement illustrates a point of tension between Markey and Kennedy in the Senate primary. Their supporters and staffers often go back-and-forth over which of the two Democrats is more progressive.
Markey's supporters insist the incumbent is more progressive, pointing to his work on the Green New Deal in particular, and cast Kennedy as a moderate
. Kennedy's campaign often pushes back.
"Just objectively not true," Kennedy spokesperson Emily Kaufman wrote on Twitter in March, pointing to an analysis of Kennedy's voting record by the database ProgressivePunch. And the campaign has taken it a step further, pointing out Markey's past positions on the Iraq War and the 1994 crime bill. "He ain't no Bernie," Kaufman wrote
of Markey.
For Progressive Massachusetts, the endorsement boiled down to Markey being "earlier" to progressive issues like Medicare for All, said member Jonathan Cohn. "You want to have people you can count on to be with you, rather than people that you spend a lot of time pressuring," Cohn said.
Despite the battle for the progressive title
, it's not a guarantee that primary voters will even want a progressive candidate when they cast ballots in September. When it comes to Medicare for All, for example, Democratic voters in Massachusetts aren't exactly sold. Only 28 percent of likely Democratic presidential primary voters said they preferred that health care option, according to a WBUR poll from the fall.
And Massachusetts voters rejected progressive
candidates on Super Tuesday. Former Vice President Joe Biden won the Democratic primary here in an upset, even as polls showed the two progressives — Sens. Elizabeth Warren and Bernie Sanders — tied for the prize days before the election.
Biden won 34 percent of the vote,
while Sanders got 27 percent and Warren got 21 percent. A caveat: combining Sanders' and Warren's vote totals would have put the two progressives ahead of Biden in terms of vote share. Either way, Cohn is taking Super Tuesday with a grain of salt.
"People approach elections at different levels somewhat differently," Cohn said. "There was probably a certain sentiment by Super Tuesday among some voters who wanted the primary to be over so they could focus on taking out Trump, which is less of a dynamic when it comes to the September primary."
Have a tip, story, suggestion, birthday, anniversary, new job, or any other nugget for the Playbook? Get in touch: smurray@politico.com.
TODAY — Boston City Councilor Andrea Campbell is a guest on WGBH's "Boston Public Radio." Rep. Ayanna Pressley is a guest on WGBH's "Basic Black."
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
LOTS OF POSTS IGNORED BY BLOGGER..... OR REMOVED ON THEIR WHIM! ALL POSTS ARE AVAILABLE ON MIDDLEBORO REVIEW AND SO ON BLOG...