Showing posts with label AGRIBUSINESS. Show all posts
Showing posts with label AGRIBUSINESS. Show all posts

Sunday, May 23, 2021

It's not just Big Oil we're dealing with:

 

We often talk about the environmental impact of the energy industry, but fossil fuel companies are not the only ones polluting our communities and harming people.

Meat and poultry giant Tyson Foods is responsible for mountains of livestock manure and fertilizer runoff from millions of acres of industrial corn and soybean fields, all of which flow freely into the Mississippi River, poisoning drinking water and compromising the health and well-being of communities downstream. Once this pollution makes its way into the Gulf of Mexico, it creates a massive "dead zone" that kills fish and other marine life and harms people who rely on fishing for a living.

Tyson executives have said they'll start using more sustainable farming practices, but so far they haven't followed through. Meanwhile, Tyson spent over $1 million dollars in 2020 alone lobbying to protect themselves from pro-environment and other regulations.

We're taking on Tyson and the pollution they bring to our communities and vital ecosystems. We need 1,000 members to make a gift by midnight on May 28—to help fuel our corporate accountability and other science—driven advocacy campaigns.

Not only is Tysons outsized carbon footprint having a devastating impact on the environment, but work at Tyson meatpacking plants is dangerous, with workers—mostly immigrants and people of color—required to work too fast, in too-tight quarters. Before the pandemic, the company ranked near the top among employers for rates of severe worker injuries. Over the last year, Tyson has been responsible for more than 12,500 COVID-19 cases and 39 deaths among its US workers, by far the largest numbers of any meat processing company.1

It will take regulatory changes on a large scale to break the hold Tyson and other giant agribusinesses have on agricultural policy and stop them from threatening people's health and safety. We need strong antitrust policies that will level the playing field for more socially and environmentally responsible producers and processors. And we need the USDA to enforce policies and regulations to protect our environment and the workers and communities who face the greatest risks from Tyson's business practices.

UCS members  like you power the savvy, grassroots advocacy that can hold Tyson Foods and corporations like them accountable. 

As the nation's largest meat and poultry producer, Tyson Foods has a lot of power, as do other companies that are part of Big Meat. But we can't be cowed by their lobbying budgets and million dollar megaphones. We have to use science and grassroots power to stop their negligent practices, which put their workers, neighboring communities, and our environment at risk.

Thank you,

John Mace
Membership Director
Union of Concerned Scientists


[1] https://blog.ucsusa.org/karen-perry-stillerman/4-ways-tyson-foods-made-2020-worse

 
 
Science for a healthy planet and safer world
© Union of Concerned Scientists is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization
2 Brattle Square, Cambridge, MA 02138


Monday, December 21, 2020

RSN: FOCUS: Biden's Pick for Agriculture Secretary Raises Serious Red Flags

 

 

Reader Supported News
21 December 20


Urgent and Immediate Appeal for Donations

At this stage we have little or nothing coming in at all. Traditionally December has been our best fundraising month of the year. Instead we find ourselves in survival mode.

If you are coming here we need you to help.

Marc Ash
Founder, Reader Supported News

Sure, I'll make a donation!


Update My Monthly Donation


If you would prefer to send a check:
Reader Supported News
PO Box 2043
Citrus Hts
CA 95611


 

Reader Supported News
21 December 20

It's Live on the HomePage Now:
Reader Supported News


RIGHT NOW WE DON’T HAVE A PRAYER OF FINISHING - Based on where we are at this point in the month and the pace at which the donations are coming in, we have no chance of meeting our budget for December. It is absolutely critical that we find a way to get the flow of contributions moving. In earnest. / Marc Ash, Founder Reader Supported News

Sure, I'll make a donation!


FOCUS: Biden's Pick for Agriculture Secretary Raises Serious Red Flags
'If the Biden team was looking for ways to unite the multi-racial working class, they have done so - in full-throated opposition to this pick.' (photo: Larry Downing/Reuters)
George Goehl, Guardian UK
Goehl writes: "Tom Vilsack is a corporate yes man and former lobbyist with a dismal record in his previous time as secretary. This is appalling."


t’s unlikely that Joe Biden expected that, of all his cabinet nominees, his choice for US agriculture secretary would cause the most blowback. Yet that is exactly what happened.

The former secretary Tom Vilsack, fresh off the revolving door, is a kind of all-in-one package of what frustrates so many about the Democratic party. His previous tenure leading the department was littered with failures, ranging from distorting data about Black farmers and discrimination to bowing to corporate conglomerates.

Vilsack’s nomination has been roundly rejected by some of the exact people who helped Biden defeat Trump: organizations representing Black people, progressive rural organizations, family farmers and environmentalists. If the Biden team was looking for ways to unite the multi-racial working class, they have done so – in full-throated opposition to this pick.

We remember when Vilsack toured agricultural communities, hearing devastating testimony of big ag’s criminal treatment of contract farmers. He went through the motions of expressing concern, but nothing came of it: the Department of Justice and the Department of Agriculture (USDA) kowtowed to agribusiness lobbyists and corporate interests, squandering a golden opportunity to rein in meat processing monopolies.

We remember when Vilsack’s USDA foreclosed on Black farmers who had outstanding complaints about racial discrimination and whitewashed its own record on civil rights. That’s in addition to the ousting of Shirley Sherrod, a Black and female USDA official, when the far-right media published a doctored hit piece, forcing her resignation.

We remember when Vilsack left his job at the USDA a week early to become a lobbyist as the chief executive of the US Dairy Export Council. He was paid a million-dollar salary to push the same failed policies of his USDA tenure, carrying out the wishes of dairy monopolies. Despite being nominated to lead the USDA again, he’s still collecting paychecks as a lobbyist.

The president-elect should have righted these wrongs by charting a bold, new course for rural communities and farmers in America. Instead, Vilsack’s nomination signaled more of the same from Democratic leadership.

“Democrats need to do something big for rural people to start supporting them again,” Francis Thicke, a family farmer in Fairfield, Iowa, told us recently. “The status quo won’t work, and that’s one reason why Vilsack is the wrong choice.”

Following Trump’s win in 2017, the organization I direct, People’s Action, embarked on a massive listening project. We traveled across rural America – from family farms in Iowa, to the Driftless region of Wisconsin, up the Thumb of Michigan, to the hills of Appalachia – and had 10,000 conversations with rural Americans. When we asked the people we met the biggest barrier to their community getting what it needed, the top answer (81%) was a government captured by corporate power. The Vilsack pick does nothing to assuage these concerns.

As Michael Stovall, founder of Independent Black Farmers, told Politico: “Vilsack is not good for the agriculture industry, period. When it comes to civil rights, the rights of people, he’s not for that.”

Mike Callicrate, a rancher from Colorado Springs, was equally direct. “Vilsack assisted big agribusiness monopolies in preying upon and gutting rural America,” he told us, “greatly reducing opportunities for young people to return and remain on our farms and ranches. His policy led to catastrophic rural decline, followed by suicide rates not seen since the 1980s farm crisis.”

Biden had a chance to finally right some wrongs. Sadly, he missed the mark on this one by a country mile.

READ MORE


Contribute to RSN

Update My Monthly Donation







Trump’s Senate Pick Is Losing. Look Who’s Paying For Him.

       LOTS OF POSTS IGNORED BY BLOGGER..... OR REMOVED ON THEIR WHIM! ALL POSTS ARE AVAILABLE ON MIDDLEBORO REVIEW AND SO ON BLOGGER DOESN...