SENATOR ED MARKEY: Add your name to become a citizen co-sponsor of my bill to send Americans $2,000 per month until this crisis is over.

One $1,200 stimulus check is not nearly enough to help families who are struggling. 

With the unemployment numbers skyrocketing, Americans need help urgently. That’s why I worked with Senators Bernie Sanders and Kamala Harris to introduce the Monthly Economic Crisis Support Act.

This bill would provide a direct cash payment of $2,000 each month to individuals with an income below $100,000 until 3 months after the coronavirus pandemic ends, as well as an additional $2,000 for children. But we need your support to pass this bill and help families across the country.

If you agree that we need these direct cash payments to help people weather this crisis, add your name as a citizen co-sponsor of our bill. People desperately need this relief.

The official unemployment rate was nearly 15 percent at the beginning of May, and many experts estimate that 1 in 5 Americans are now out of work. Our unemployment offices have never handled this level of need, leaving many still waiting for assistance.

People are falling ill and falling behind on their bills — and for the families of the thousands who have died of COVID-19, medical and funeral expenses are compounding their grief.

After the Great Depression, FDR started the New Deal to help the country rebound. My feeling is that this is a similar moment. Our policy must match the urgency and enormity of this moment.

This money will be the liferaft that will help families to make it through this crisis without being economically destroyed.

Join Bernie, Kamala, and I and become a citizen co-signer of our Monthly Economic Crisis Support Act. We will get through this pandemic together, but only if Congress takes bold action to provide relief to families across the country.

We have to help people who, through no fault of their own, are seeing all of the things that they care about, all the success that they’ve worked for, and all the financial security they’ve earned get away from them.

Thank you,

Ed Markey

ADD YOUR NAME

---

Paid for by The Markey Committee

The Markey Committee PO Box 120029 Boston, MA 02112

RSN: FOCUS: Bernie Sanders | $2,000 Per Person Per Month

18 May 20

---

The People Who Do Not Donate Hold the Key

RSN has many supporters, we have many more however who come often but simply will not contribute. These are the people who hold the key. Any fundraiser, every fundraiser would be a breeze with just a little more support. This is a river we must cross.

With sincerity.

Marc Ash
Founder, Reader Supported News

Sure, I'll make a donation!

---

Update My Monthly Donation

---

If you would prefer to send a check:
Reader Supported News
PO Box 2043
Citrus Hts
CA 95611

17 May 20

It's Live on the HomePage Now:
Reader Supported News

WHY ARE YOU HERE? Why have you chosen to be and stay here with Reader Supported News? It means something to you, no? This organization is underfunded … Because 1% of the subscribers can’t bring themselves to respond to the fundraising appeals!? That’s crazy. “Be here”, we need you. / Marc Ash, Founder Reader Supported News

Sure, I'll make a donation!

---

FOCUS: Bernie Sanders | $2,000 Per Person Per Month

Bernie Sanders, Friends of Bernie
Sanders writes: "I am writing to you today to ask you to support our legislation to provide emergency monthly payments of $2,000 to all working people, and to tell Mitch McConnell to include it in the next relief bill."

Let me be very clear:

A single check of $1,200 is not nearly enough. In many places, that may only be enough to cover one month's rent. More than 36 million people have filed for unemployment and millions more are going hungry, getting evicted, losing their homes, and having trouble paying off their credit card bills.

This unprecedented crisis demands an unprecedented legislative response.

During this crisis, Congress must make sure that every working-class household receives a $2,000 monthly payment for each family member.

If we can bail out large corporations, we can ensure that everyone in this country has the income to support themselves and afford basic necessities.

That is why I am asking you today:

Add your name: Tell Mitch McConnell to provide monthly $2,000 payments for the duration of the coronavirus pandemic.

Here is what the bill would do:

• Provide a monthly $2,000 check to every person with an annual income below $120,000 for as long as this pandemic lasts and for three months after it ends.


• Married couples who file jointly would receive $4,000 and parents would receive $2,000 per child for up to three children.


• Ensure that every U.S. resident receives a payment, regardless of whether or not they have filed a recent tax return or have a Social Security number.


• Forbid debt collectors from seizing the payments.


• Make payments retroactive to March when this crisis began.

In my view, the coronavirus relief legislation recently released by Democrats in the House does not provide substantial support for working families. One additional $1,200 check is not enough to survive when tens of millions have lost their jobs and are struggling to support themselves.

One of the best ways to support working people who are feeling the economic impact of this crisis is to ensure they continue to have reliable income to afford the basic necessities they need.

That is what our legislation is designed to do, and today I am asking for your support:

Add your name if you agree Congress must provide $2,000 monthly payments during the coronavirus pandemic. Working people need relief now.

Thank you for adding your name today.

In solidarity,
Bernie Sanders

READ MORE

---

Contribute to RSN 

Update My Monthly Donation

RSN: 2020: The "Darkest Winter in Modern History."

16 May 20

It's Live on the HomePage Now:
Reader Supported News

URGENT APPEAL FOR IMMEDIATE ASSISTANCE - Donations are far behind for May. We are reaching out for immediate assistance on donations to finish this drive and cover expenses. RSN never wavers in its determination to keep you informed and provide you the tools you need to make a difference. Please stand with Reader Supported News now. In Peace and Solidarity. / Marc Ash, Founder Reader Supported News

Sure, I'll make a donation!

---

2020: The "Darkest Winter in Modern History."

Brian Naylor, NPR
Naylor writes: "Rick Bright, a career government scientist-turned-whistleblower, told a congressional panel Thursday that without a stronger federal response, the coronavirus threatens to make 2020 the 'darkest winter in modern history.'"

READ MORE

U.S. State Department Inspector General Steve Linick leaves after holding a briefing with lawmakers on Capitol Hill in Washington, D.C., October 2, 2019. (photo: Nicholas Kamm/AFP/Getty Images)

ALSO SEE: Trump's Firing of Steve Linick an 'Unlawful Act of
Retaliation' for Pompeo Inquiry, Democrats Say

State Department Inspector General Becomes the Latest Watchdog Fired by Trump
Zachary Cohen, Manu Raju, Jennifer Hansler, Veronica Stracqualursi, Kylie Atwood and Vivian Salama, CNN
Excerpt: "President Donald Trump on Friday fired State Department Inspector General Steve Linick, the latest in a series of dismissals of independent government watchdogs that have come in the wake of the President's acquittal on articles of impeachment earlier this year."
READ MORE

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-CA, walks past the Statuary Hall ahead of floor debate on a record $3 trillion coronavirus response package Friday to fund the fight against the pandemic and provide emergency payments to millions of Americans. (photo: Olivier Douliery/AFP/Getty Images)

House Approves $3 Trillion Proposal for New Coronavirus Aid
Claudia Grisales, Kelsey Snell and Susan Davis, NPR
Excerpt: "House lawmakers on Friday approved a Democratic proposal to provide $3 trillion in coronavirus relief which would include a new wave of help for state and local governments, workers and families."
READ MORE

Immigrant children in a detention center. (photo: Ross D. Franklin)

Indefinite Detention or Family Separation? US Forced Immigrants to Choose, Lawyers Say
Amanda Holpuch, Guardian UK
Holpuch writes: "US officials gave dozens of detained immigrant parents an ultimatum - allow your children to be released from detention without you or face indefinite detention together, according to legal representatives from the country's three family detention centers."
READ MORE

House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy, R-CA, speaks on proxy voting and the House COVID-19 stimulus bill, during a social-distanced press conference at the U.S. Capitol on Friday. (photo: Kevin Dietsch/UPI)

With Move to Remote Voting, House Alters What It Means for Congress to Meet
Nicholas Fandos, The New York Times
Fandos writes: "The House of Representatives acted on Friday to allow remote voting and virtual hearings. The vote untethered Congress from its mandate to come together physically."
READ MORE

An undated picture, likely taken in the 1930s, shows the Old City of Jerusalem. (photo: AFP)

Nakba: The Forgotten 19th Century Origins of the Palestinian Catastrophe
Joseph Massad, Middle East Eye
Massad writes: "The Nakba, Palestinians' loss of their lands and homes, arguably began in the 1880s with the arrival of the first Zionist Jewish colonists, who evicted Palestinians from land the colonists had purchased from absentee landlords."
READ MORE

Pollution from a factory. (photo: Science Focus)

States Sue Trump EPA for Suspending Environmental Regulations During Pandemic
Tiffany Duong, EcoWatch
Duong writes: "On Wednesday, nine states sued the Trump administration over the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) decision to temporarily relax various environmental regulations during the coronavirus pandemic."

The move has been called an implicit "license to pollute," according to The Hill, and allegedly violates numerous federal pollution laws as well as the EPA's duty to protect the environment.

The states' complaint challenges a March 26 EPA memo in which the agency put forth a new, relaxed policy. Polluters are allowed, at their sole discretion, to stop monitoring and reporting air emissions and water pollution levels during the outbreak.

The memo was produced by the EPA's compliance director, Susan Parker Bodine, three days after she received a request from the American Petroleum Institute to halt pollution enforcement, reported the San Francisco Chronicle.

In the memo, Bodine announced that the new, relaxed policies would be retroactive to March 13, when President Trump declared a state of emergency regarding COVID-19. Due to outbreak-related "potential worker shortages" and "travel and social distancing restrictions," companies could decide for themselves when it would no longer be practical to monitor pollution and report it to federal, state and local agencies, the San Francisco Chronicle reported.

Bodine said businesses should try to follow reporting and monitoring regulations but that noncompliance would not be penalized if caused by coronavirus, reported the San Francisco Chronicle. She did not indicate how the EPA could learn of any violations or dangerous emissions if reporting isn't required, the news report added.

Similarly, the regulation change is "temporary," but no end date is indicated in the memo. And, while companies are required to document their noncompliance, critics fear the environmental damage will already be done, reported The Hill.

EPA Administrator Andrew Wheeler said that the EPA recognized that challenges created by COVID-19 "may directly impact the ability of regulated facilities to meet all federal regulatory requirements," reported the San Francisco Chronicle.

Wheeler also said the agency would still "expect facilities to comply with their obligations under the law" unless, of course, Covid-19 made it "impracticable," reported Bloomberg Law.

The states' lawsuit, filed in New York federal court, alleges that the EPA lacks the legal authority to "effectively waive critical monitoring and reporting obligations" that alert the public to environmental and health hazards, reported Bloomberg Law. It also argues that the EPA failed to properly weigh the public health impacts the relaxed policy will have amid the coronavirus pandemic, reported Reuters.

"Rather than exercising enforcement discretion as authorized by law, EPA issued a broad, open-ended policy that gives regulated parties free rein to self-determine when compliance with federal environmental laws is not practical because of Covid-19," the complaint stated.

The enforcement suspensions will lead to more chemical spills and "likely will result in increased air and water pollution," endangering residents who live nearby, downwind or downstream, the suit added, reported the San Francisco Chronicle.

The states also argued that the EPA failed to demonstrate both the need for the drastic change and any rationale for bypassing the traditional notice and comment period required for new rules, reported The Hill. The Clean Air Act and Clean Water Act both require companies to monitor and report emissions to the EPA, and the agency has therefore exceeded its authorities under both regulations, the complaint says, reported The Hill.

"The Trump Administration cannot give industries the green light to ignore critical environmental and public health laws, especially during a public health crisis," said New York Attorney General Letitia James, reported Bloomberg Law.

California Attorney General Xavier Becerra said, "The Trump Administration is trying to use the current public health crisis to sweep environmental violations under the rug," reported The Hill.

"What's worse, the Administration is doing so even as evidence grows that communities exposed to air pollution are at increased risk from coronavirus," he added, reported The Hill.

The EPA would not comment on the litigation, but told The Hill that "the EPA temporary policy is a lawful and proper exercise of the Agency's authority under extraordinary circumstances." In the same statement, the EPA noted, "This is not a nationwide waiver of environmental rules."

The EPA was also sued on April 16 by environmental groups seeking to require the agency to determine when companies stopped complying with environmental laws and to immediately notify the public, reported the San Francisco Chronicle.

The nine states filing the complaint are California, Illinois, Maryland, Michigan, Minnesota, New York, Oregon, Vermont and Virginia. The suit alleges that the regulation rollback, if allowed to persist, will force states to try to "fill EPA's enforcement shoes at a time when they are increasingly strapped for resources, or risk the health of our residents," reported the San Francisco Chronicle.

READ MORE

---

Contribute to RSN 

Update My Monthly Donation