Tuesday, April 21, 2020

RSN: FOCUS: Rebecca Gordon | Strange Attractors: On Being Addicted to Trump and His Press Conferences






Reader Supported News
21 April 20

It's Live on the HomePage Now:
Reader Supported News





FOCUS: Rebecca Gordon | Strange Attractors: On Being Addicted to Trump and His Press Conferences
Press briefing at the White House. (photo: Alex Brandon/AP/Shutterstock)
Rebecca Gordon, TomDispatch
Gordon writes: "My partner and I have been fighting about politics since we met in 1965. I was 13. She was 18 and my summer camp counselor. (It was another 14 years before we became a couple.)"

EXCERPT:
He hosted 14 seasons of The Apprentice and its successor, The Celebrity Apprentice, and in all those years I probably spent seven minutes watching the show, or flipping past it as I looked for something else -- and, as far as I was concerned, that was seven minutes too many. I don’t want you to think that I didn’t watch my share of junk on TV. I did. But a blowhard New York real-estate (self-)promoter whose most memorable line was “You’re fired!” judging the business skills of a group of sycophantic contestants? I preferred Law and Order reruns any day of the decade.
And here’s the thing: now, I get to watch the “You’re fired!” show (“nasty!”) whether I want to or not. In fact, just about the only thing Donald Trump has proven good at is firing people in his administration, which has a turnover rate the likes of which is surely historically unprecedented. In fact, the Brookings Institution estimates that 85% of his “A team” has turned over in these years, sometimes many times. After all, he's had four chiefs of staff, five deputy chiefs of staff, five communications directors, four press secretaries, four national security advisors, at least six deputy national security advisors, three secretaries of defense (one “acting”), and so on.
Unfortunately, just about the only ones who haven’t been fired are the rest of us and, in our coronaviral moment, we have little choice (if we aren’t front-line workers) but to sit idly and watch, or force ourselves not to watch, you-know-who.
Once upon a time, if you had predicted such a future for me, I would have thought you mad. No longer. How appropriate, then, that today TomDispatch regular Rebecca Gordon, facing the slings and arrows of outrageous press conferences, focuses on Hamlet’s famous query, modernized for the era of The Donald: to watch or not to watch, that is the question, and it's one hard not to ask nightly in the Covid-19 era.
-Tom Engelhardt, TomDispatch
EXCERPTS:
For a couple of weeks now, I’ve been watching each live broadcast of the Trump Follies, otherwise known as the White House daily coronavirus task force briefings. Readers who, like me, remember the Vietnam War may also recall the infamous “Five O’Clock Follies,” the U.S. military’s mendacious daily briefings from the South Vietnamese capital, Saigon, during that endless conflict. There, its spokesmen regularly offered evidence, including grimly inflated “body counts” of enemy dead, that allowed them to claim they were winning a losing war. The question today, of course, is whether the present pandemic version of those follies offers at least a small glimmer of hope that the president may now be mired in his own Covid-19 version of Vietnam.
After I’ve spent a couple of irretrievable hours of my life gaping at the muddled mind of Donald Trump, I always feel a sickening sensation, as if I’d kept eating Oreo cookies long after they stopped tasting good. But it doesn’t matter. The next day, I just turn it on again. I wonder if it’s people like me who are responsible for that TV ratings bump of his?


Why am I fascinated by the way just about everyone on the podium fawns all over him, starting with Vice President Mike Pence, the titular head of “the president’s” Coronavirus Task Force (unless, this week, it’s Jared Kushner)? Why do I keep listening to Pence intoning, “The president has directed that...” or referring to “President Trump’s 15-day coronavirus guidelines,” as if Trump himself had written them and designed the oversized postcard outlining them, which arrived in people's mail at the end of March? Why am I mesmerized as assorted business “leaders” like MyPillow CEO Mike Lindell trip over themselves outdoing each another in praising the president? Lindell, in fact, used his minute and a half of fame to tell the world that God had essentially elected Donald Trump in 2016. (I guess that explains it! I knew I hadn’t voted for him.)
















The Postal Service could be dead in three months




Dear MoveOn member,

The U.S. Postal Service could be dead in three months unless Congress provides emergency funding to shore up this crucial public service.1


But Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin, and the Republicans are refusing to include the Postal Service in any coronavirus relief legislation, because privatizing mail delivery has been a long-term goal of the conservative movement, and they see this crisis as their opportunity to kill off the Postal Service once and for all.2


Meanwhile, Donald Trump hates the Postal Service for his own sociopathic reason: The Postal Service delivers packages for Amazon, whose founder, Jeff Bezos, also owns The Washington Post, a newspaper that hasn't been afraid to publish hard-hitting journalism on the Trump administration.3 So, in the middle of a global pandemic and the worst economic crisis since the Great Depression, Trump is threatening to bankrupt a critically important public service to exact revenge for his petty grievances.4


Democrats are pushing hard to get emergency funding for the Postal Service included in the next coronavirus relief bill, and MoveOn is launching a digital ad campaign to demand that Trump and the Republicans stop blocking Postal Service relief funding. To make sure they can't ignore us, we will run targeted ads in rural districts that would be hit hardest by the Postal Service shutdown—communities that Trump must win big to have any chance of re-election.

Can you chip in $5 a month to help launch and sustain a digital ad campaign calling on Congress to include desperately needed aid to the United States Postal Service in the next stimulus package and to continue to fight to save the Post Office all the way until Election Day?


The death of the Postal Service would be a crushing blow to Americans desperately trying to get by while sheltering in place.

Rural communities might never bounce back without the guarantee of reliable, standard-rate mail service. Small businesses in rural communities that rely on mail-order customers would go bankrupt. And people who live in these communities would be unable to get the essential deliveries—including medicine—they count on the Postal Service to deliver.5


The death of the Postal Service would also eliminate any kind of vote-by-mail program, disenfranchising millions of voters in November. And postal workers—39% of whom are people of color—would be left jobless.6


Most Americans don't know it, but the Postal Service doesn't receive a single taxpayer dollar.7 It is entirely funded by revenue from the sales of stamps and postage. But just like so many other businesses, the Postal Service has seen its revenue collapse during this pandemic. As a result, the entire operation could go bust by September, according to the postmaster general and the postal workers union.


It's especially tragic considering that postal workers, like doctors, nurses, and other essential workers, are getting sick and dying while working on the front lines of this pandemic to keep the rest of us afloat.8


Just imagine what life would be like right now if the mail stopped coming or if the only way to send or receive mail was to pay FedEx rates. It would be devastating. But Trump can't get over the fact that The Washington Post doesn't give him nonstop positive coverage. And privatization of mail delivery would be a massive boon to his corporate donors—at the expense of everyday Americans.


The next coronavirus relief bill could get passed as early as this week, and funding for the Postal Service must be included in it. With your help, we will launch a digital ad campaign calling out Trump and McConnell for blocking this desperately needed funding.


Can you chip in $5 a month to help launch and sustain a digital ad campaign, and keep it running for as long as it takes to stop Donald Trump from shutting down the United States Postal Service? 



Thanks for all you do.

–Kelly, Seth, Jenn, Lisa, and the rest of the team

Sources:
1. "The Head of the Postal Workers Union Says the Postal Service Could Be Dead in Three Months," In These Times, April 16, 2020
https://act.moveon.org/go/119675?t=6&akid=262286%2E3735812%2EtK2lOk
2. "White House rejects bailout for U.S. Postal Service battered by coronavirus," The Washington Post, April 11, 2020
https://act.moveon.org/go/119602?t=8&akid=262286%2E3735812%2EtK2lOk
3. "Trump's Vendetta Against Jeff Bezos Could Destroy the Postal Service," Vanity Fair, April 13, 2020
https://act.moveon.org/go/119676?t=10&akid=262286%2E3735812%2EtK2lOk
4. "Coronavirus job losses could total 47 million, unemployment rate may hit 32 percent, Fed estimates," NBC News, March 30, 2020
https://act.moveon.org/go/119371?t=12&akid=262286%2E3735812%2EtK2lOk
5. "If the US Postal Service fails, rural America will suffer the most," Vox, April 16, 2020
https://act.moveon.org/go/119677?t=14&akid=262286%2E3735812%2EtK2lOk
6. "Workforce Diversity and Inclusiveness," U.S. Postal Service, accessed April 18, 2020
https://act.moveon.org/go/119623?t=16&akid=262286%2E3735812%2EtK2lOk
7. "The U.S. Postal Service is Owned by the People—Let's Keep it That Way," AFL-CIO, April 23, 2019
https://act.moveon.org/go/119678?t=18&akid=262286%2E3735812%2EtK2lOk
8. "The U.S. Postal Service Needs Help Now: 'The Situation Is Absolutely Dire,'" New York, April 17, 2020
https://act.moveon.org/go/119679?t=20&akid=262286%2E3735812%2EtK2lOk

Want to support our work? The MoveOn community will work every moment, day by day and year by year, to resist Trump's agenda, contain the damage, defeat hate with love, and begin the process of swinging the nation's pendulum back toward sanity, decency, and the kind of future that we must never give up on. And to do it we need your ongoing support, now more than ever. Will you stand with us?
Yes, I'll chip in $5 a month.
No, I'm sorry, I can't make a monthly donation.


PAID FOR BY MOVEON . ORG POLITICAL ACTION, http://pol.moveon.org/. Not authorized by any candidate or candidate's committee.






RSN: FOCUS: Jeffrey Toobin | Despite the Coronavirus Pandemic, the Government Is Still Targeting LGBTQ Rights






Reader Supported News
21 April 20



As of 10 AM Pacific we have a total of 9 donations for the day. In the same time 168,375 readers have visited. That’s not reasonable, that’s abusive, absurd and it will without any doubt quickly cause a funding crisis for the organization.

Seriously.

Marc Ash
Founder, Reader Supported News







If you would prefer to send a check:
Reader Supported News
PO Box 2043
Citrus Hts
CA 95611





Reader Supported News
21 April 20

It's Live on the HomePage Now:
Reader Supported News





FOCUS: Jeffrey Toobin | Despite the Coronavirus Pandemic, the Government Is Still Targeting LGBTQ Rights
'Religious freedom,' in its current incarnation, has little to do with religion or freedom; it's a payoff to a privileged political constituency, usually at the expense of others. (photo: Orlin Wagner/AP/Shutterstock)
Jeffrey Toobin, The New Yorker
Toobin writes: "'Religious freedom,' in its current incarnation, has little to do with religion or freedom. Rather, it's a payoff to a privileged political constituency, usually at the expense of others."



hortly before Easter, Laura Kelly, the governor of Kansas and a Democrat, issued an order banning gatherings of ten or more people, including in churches, as a protective measure against the spread of the novel coronavirus. Soon thereafter, the Kansas legislature, which is controlled by Republicans, overturned the order. Susan Wagle, the Senate President, speaking about religious Kansans, said that the order “was a violation of their constitutional rights to have the government tell them that they cannot participate in a church service.” The Kansas Supreme Court ultimately upheld the governor’s order, on procedural grounds, but on Saturday Judge John Broomes, a Donald Trump appointee, issued a temporary restraining order on Governor Kelly’s order, for two churches. The story was the same in Louisville, Kentucky, where a federal judge had banned that city’s government from enforcing social distancing at Easter services. As the judge put it, “On Holy Thursday, an American mayor criminalized the communal celebration of Easter.”
Justin Walker, the judge in the Kentucky case, is a notable figure. He’s a protégé of Mitch McConnell, the Senate Majority Leader, and President Trump just nominated him to the D.C. Circuit, a traditional stepping stone to the Supreme Court. As Ian Millhiser points out, in Vox, Walker may have misrepresented the facts of the case, because he was so anxious to preen on the issue. (For example, Walker said that the congregants in Louisville were threatened with arrest and prosecution; the city’s mayor said that that was not true.) Walker was using the Louisville Easter case to burnish his credentials on the hottest issue in the conservative movement: religious freedom.
“Religious freedom,” in its current incarnation, has little to do with religion or freedom. Rather, it’s a payoff to a privileged political constituency, usually at the expense of others. William Barr, the Attorney General, is at the center of this effort, which he kicked off with a fire-breathing speech at Notre Dame last year. (I wrote about the speech here.) In a key passage, Barr said, “Militant secularists today do not have a live-and-let-live spirit—they are not content to leave religious people alone to practice their faith. Instead, they seem to take a delight in compelling people to violate their conscience.” Translated, this means that the rest of society—including the government—must accommodate the religious beliefs of others, even if it means violating the rights supposedly guaranteed to all. These religious groups want special privilege, not equal treatment under the law—and the Trump Administration wants to indulge their political desires. Indeed, after a showy display of federal displeasure from Barr’s Justice Department, the city of Greenville, Mississippi, backed down on a ban on drive-in religious services.
“Religious freedom” is an Administration-wide initiative, and there’s no doubt about the primary target: the L.G.B.T.Q. community. In not only the Justice Department but also in the Education and Labor Departments, the government is trying to make it easier to discriminate against gay people. Earlier this year, Betsy DeVos, the Secretary of Education, issued proposed regulations that would allow discrimination against gay people at virtually any private university. Current law says that educational institutions “controlled by a religious organization” may be exempt from certain anti-discrimination rules. A religious school, for instance, may be allowed to restrict certain jobs to members of its faith. But, under DeVos’s new rule, any institution that says it “subscribes to specific moral beliefs or practices” would be exempt. As a group of Democratic senators noted in a letter to DeVos, the proposed rule would represent an attack on women as well as on gay people. “Enforcing the proposed factors as written would allow virtually any college or university to claim an exemption,” they wrote. “Individuals could be fired or not provided resources on the basis of their sex, including sexual orientation, gender identity, pregnancy, childbirth or related medical conditions, all based on an organization’s self-defined religious tenets.”
In a similar vein, the Labor Department has proposed rules that would make it easier for companies to base employment decisions on religious criteria. Religious owners of businesses could fire gay people because they are gay, refuse to hire people because they are cohabitating outside of marriage, and avoid paying for contraception as part of their compensation packages. (The Supreme Court has already approved companies owned by religious people avoiding otherwise mandated coverage for birth control, in the Hobby Lobby case.) And the “religious freedom” agenda also includes allowing governments to subsidize church-run institutions, such as parochial schools. In the zero-sum world of government funding, of course, money that goes to parochial schools is not available to public schools—which are open to everyone.
In customary fashion, the conservative movement is planning for the long term when it comes to “religious freedom.” Over opposition from liberal students, the law schools at Harvard and Stanford recently opened clinics where students can represent real clients in “religious freedom” cases. The next generation of advocates and judges is moving into place.
















The GOP just tried to kick hundreds of students off the voter rolls

    This year, MAGA GOP activists in Georgia attempted to disenfranchise hundreds of students by trying to kick them off the voter rolls. De...