Saturday, February 15, 2020

First Trump came for the women.....



Signe Olson 

First Trump came for the women
And I did not speak out
Because I was not a woman.


Then Trump came for the people with disabilities
And I did not speak out
Because I did not have a disability.

Then Trump came for the African Americans
And I did not speak out
Because I was not African American.

Then Trump came for the Mexicans
And I did not speak out
Because I was not Mexican.

Then Trump came for the Muslims
And I did not speak out
Because I was not Muslim.

Then Trump came for the gay, bi, and trans people
And I did not speak out
Because I was not gay, bi or trans.*

Then Trump came for the Jews
And I did not speak out
Because I was not a Jew.**

Then Trump came for the journalists
And I did not speak out
Because I was not a journalist.***

Then Trump came for the judges
And I did not speak out
Because I was not a judge.

And now Trump is coming for the Constitution of the United States
And if I do not speak out, what am I?

* Actually I am one of those, and I didn’t speak out about that.
** And one of those, and didn’t speak out about that either.
*** Ditto.

Written by Gideon Lichfield

RTFA for the why and how Lichfield came to write this adaptation of Martin Niemöller’s sad, but, true, lament for all the “Good Germans” who said and did nothing during the rise of Hitler and Naziism.







Image may contain: ‎1 person, ‎possible text that says '‎DaveZirin @edgeofsports As a Jew, I want to welcome anyone who wants to criticize a lobbying coalition funded by arms manufacturers, evangelical Christians, and allies of the right wing edge of Israeli politics. Criticizing AIPAC is not anti-Semitic and it's absurd that this even needs to be said. עW‎'‎‎









New Hampshire Primary... Bloomberg as Savior... 'No. 1 Sponsor of Terrorism'....


 

Weekly Alert: February 15, 2020

Here are the stories FAIR has been working on this week. Please help us spread the word by forwarding this email to friends and by sharing our stories on social media like Facebook and Twitter.
 
FAIR’s ad-free, content-rich site
is supported by contributions from
our loyal band of media activists.


Please donate today!

FAIR's Website
 


 

FAIR/Fairness & Accuracy In Reporting
124 W. 30th Street, Suite 201
New York NY 10001
USA
Copyright © 2020 FAIR, All rights reserved.

Our mailing address is:
FAIR
124 W 30th St Rm 201
New York, NY 10001-4009













FOCUS: Bernie Sanders Can Beat Trump With His Liberal Vision for America. Primary Voters Know It.






Reader Supported News
15 February 20



It’s not fair to RSN, not fair to its employees, not fair to you and not fair to the our collective struggle on so many issues. Not fair.

700 donations a month from half a million visitors should be easy.

Never someone else. Always you.

Marc Ash
Founder, Reader Supported News








If you would prefer to send a check:
Reader Supported News
PO Box 2043
Citrus Hts
CA 95611




Reader Supported News
15 February 20

It's Live on the HomePage Now:
Reader Supported News





FOCUS: Bernie Sanders Can Beat Trump With His Liberal Vision for America. Primary Voters Know It.
Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., takes the stage during a primary night event on Feb. 11, 2020 in Manchester, Ne.H. (Photo: Joe Raedle/Getty Images)
Jamie Peck, NBC News
Peck writes: "Do not adjust your television set: Sen. Bernie Sanders, could very well be the next president of the United States of America."


Democratic primary voters aren't just eager to win the presidency. They're also eager to see a leader fight for a real progressive policy platform.

According to a poll conducted by Morning Consult the day after the New Hampshire primary, the self-described democratic socialist leads the pack of candidates among Democratic primary voters nationwide, with 29 percent of potential voters saying they’d vote for him if their state’s caucus or primary were held today.
Former vice president Joe Biden, once in the lead, now trails a full 10 points behind Sanders, with billionaire former New York City mayor Michael Bloomberg, former McKinsey consultant-cum-South Bend, Indiana mayor Pete Buttigieg and Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., in third, fourth and fifth place, respectively.
In the same poll, 29 percent of Democrats thought Sanders and Biden were likely to beat Trump, a precipitous 12-point drop for Biden from the organization’s post-Iowa poll and a six-point increase for Sanders. (Bloomberg rose seven points to 25 percent, possibly on the strength of his massive ad buys).
The change in the two men's prospects is even more pronounced among black voters, who have been some of Biden’s strongest supporters; their perception of Biden as the most electable candidate fell 10 points to 21 percent, while Sanders rose nine points to 32 percent. That is especially bad for Biden considering that he’s centered much of his pitch around being the safest bet against Trump — a consideration many Democratic voters, particularly people of color, rank highly in their thinking.
But as Biden’s case for his superior electability collapses, it makes sense that voters would take a second look at Sanders, who, in addition to polling well against Trump, aligns more closely with the Democratic Party base — particularly, according to some polls, black and Hispanic voters — on key policy issues like immigration and "Medicare for All."
Are voters right to believe in Bernie? While polls can only tell us so much at this juncture, the latest one from Quinnipiac University surveying all registered voters shows him doing well in a head-to-head against Trump, beating him 51-43 percent; in the same poll, Biden bests Trump 50-43 and Bloomberg does so 51-42. Sanders, however, polls the best against Trump with independents — which makes sense, as he’s the longest-serving independent member of Congress in U.S. history.
And, he beat a Republican incumbent when he ran for the House in 1990, and won his 2006 Senate race by flipping a seat that had been occupied by Republicans for 144 years. Whether he could do the same at the national level when Americans' votes have to be filtered through the insanity of the electoral college and all sorts of voter suppression is unclear, but at the very least, Sanders’ detractors have little evidence that he’s "not electable" in places that tend to prefer more conservative representation.
Even Donald Trump has seemed impressed: In an apparent recorded conversation released by Lev Parnas’ legal team, the president said that he believes Hillary Clinton would’ve been “tougher” to beat in 2016 had she chosen Sanders as her running mate: “He's the only one I didn't want her to pick.”
Sanders’ supporters believe his decades-long record of fighting for social and economic justice and criticizing the corrupt political establishment will turn out people in the general election who don’t habitually vote — a group that skews young, poor and non-white.
And, while non-voters skew slightly more conservative than voting Democrats on social issues, they not only support single-payer healthcare at higher rates, but 51 percent also want “a Democrat who will fundamentally change America.” Does that sound like anyone you know?
To his energetic and activated base, Sanders is that rare candidate who combines bold, progressive ideas with an actual path to electoral victory. (No offense, former Rep. Dennis Kucinich, D-Ohio.) We've listened for decades as party leaders have said that they would love to fight for things like single-payer healthcare, tuition-free public college and criminal justice reform, if only those things weren’t political suicide. It took Sanders' insurgent 2016 candidacy to drag the party and the conversation to the left, and now he’s back with an even more ambitious program.
The social forces that propelled Sanders to the national stage in 2016 after years as an obscure voice for progress seemed to surprise even him — and even more so than last time, he’s running to win, not just to start a conversation.
Of course, his candidacy would never have taken off the way it did in 2016 or again in 2020 if grassroots movements like Occupy Wall Street and Black Lives Matter hadn't empowered regular, working class people to talk about our political-economic system's failure to deliver on their promises for all but a lucky few. And, more recently, the nationwide wave of teachers’ strikes both fed into, and was fed by, the movement behind Sanders.
As he’s fond of reminding people, Sanders understands that real change comes from the bottom up, not the top down. So 2020 is not just about electing Bernie Sanders; it's about shifting the balance of power away from the "millionaires and billionaires" and toward the people who do the lion's share of the work on which our society runs. And, win or lose, that fight — which involves many interlocking problems — will continue.
With the slogan “Not me. Us,” Sanders acknowledges he’s part of something larger than himself: A movement for social justice and economic democracy to counter the threat of right-wing authoritarianism. So don't think about it as voting for him; think about it as voting for all of us.

















AIPAC Is Helping Fund Anti-Bernie Sanders Super Pac Ads in Nevada





Reader Supported News
15 February 20



What will tomorrow bring, a day of scratching together funding, or a day of dedicating the organization's efforts to challenging the injustice that effects our daily lives. We need 700 Donations total for the drive. 700 readers visit RSN every 30 minutes.

Let’s make RSN strong.

Marc Ash
Founder, Reader Supported News








If you would prefer to send a check:
Reader Supported News
PO Box 2043
Citrus Hts
CA 95611





Reader Supported News
15 February 20

It's Live on the HomePage Now:
Reader Supported News





AIPAC Is Helping Fund Anti-Bernie Sanders Super Pac Ads in Nevada
Benjamin Netanyahu, Israel’s prime minister, at last year’s Aipac conference. Mr. Netanyahu, along with leaders of both parties in Congress, is also expected to attend this year. (photo: Jose Luis Magana/AP)
Ryan Grim and Akela Lacy, The Intercept
Excerpt: "The American Israel Public Affairs Committee is helping to fund a Super PAC launching attack ads against Sen. Bernie Sanders in Nevada on Saturday, according to two sources with knowledge of the arrangement. The ads are being run by a group called Democratic Majority for Israel, founded by longtime AIPAC strategist Mark Mellman."
READ MORE


William Barr: ‘Shrewd, deliberate, smart, calculating, careful, and full of it,’ according to the former US attorney Preet Bharara. (photo: Jim Lo Scalzo/EPA)
William Barr: ‘Shrewd, deliberate, smart, calculating, careful, and full of it,’ according to the former US attorney Preet Bharara. (photo: Jim Lo Scalzo/EPA)


William Barr: How the Attorney General Became Trump's Enabler-in-Chief
Tom McCarthy, Guardian UK
McCarthy writes: "Lawyers who have filled political appointee positions in the Trump administration have been pursued by doubts about their qualifications or caliber. In 2018, a justice department staffer was made acting attorney general, the department’s top job."
READ MORE


I’ve seen Bernie Sanders stand with Vermont workers for 20 years. It’s time for unions to back him. (photo: Bill Pugliano/Getty Images)
I’ve seen Bernie Sanders stand with Vermont workers for 20 years. It’s time for unions to back him. (photo: Bill Pugliano/Getty Images)


I Know Firsthand Why Unions Should Endorse Bernie
Andrew Tripp, In These Times
Tripp writes: "One late summer evening in 2000, my home phone rang in Moretown, Vermont. 'Can you please hold for Congressman Sanders?' the voice on the line asked."
READ MORE


Shadow Inc.'s app. (photo: AP)
Shadow Inc.'s app. (photo: AP)


Documents Reveal DNC Was 'Intimately Involved' in Development of Troubled Iowa Caucus App
Hunter Walker, Yahoo News
Walker writes: "While the Democratic National Committee over the past 10 days has tried to distance itself from the troubled app that threw the results of the Iowa caucuses into disarray, a copy of the contract and internal correspondence provided to Yahoo News demonstrates that national party officials had extensive oversight over the development of the technology."
READ MORE


Prescription drugs. (photo: iStock)
Prescription drugs. (photo: iStock)


The Americans Forced Into Bankruptcy to Pay for Prescriptions
Michael Sainato, Guardian UK
Sainato writes: "As a teenager, John Miller was diagnosed with Crohn’s disease, an inflammatory bowel condition that required several major surgeries to remove part of his intestine."
READ MORE


Your silence is an accomplice”, “They are killing us” or “Indifferent President” were some of the slogans wrote on the walls against the gender violence and discrimination. (photo: AP)
Your silence is an accomplice”, “They are killing us” or “Indifferent President” were some of the slogans wrote on the walls against the gender violence and discrimination. (photo: AP)


Mexico: Women Protest Femicides at National Palace
teleSUR
Excerpt: "A large group of women demonstrated in front of the National Palace and other places of Mexico City to protest about femicides, such as Ingrid Escamilla's, allegedly carried out by her partner, Erick Francisco, EFE News Agency reported."
READ MORE


Oil slick in the Gulf of Mexico. (photo: Chris Graythen/Getty Images)
Oil slick in the Gulf of Mexico. (photo: Chris Graythen/Getty Images)


Believe It or Not, the Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill Was Even Worse Than Previously Thought
Emily Pontecorvo, Grist
Pontecorvo writes: "After the Deepwater Horizon explosion in the spring of 2010, oil poured into the Gulf of Mexico for nearly three months straight, resulting in the worst offshore oil spill in U.S. history. More than 200 million gallons of light crude flowed into the sea, devastating marine life and fisheries."

Ten years later, scientists are still uncovering new facets of the disaster and its aftermath. A study published Wednesday from researchers at the University of Miami found that fisheries closed by federal and state agencies after the spill only accounted for about 70 percent of the actual extent of the toxicity that emanated from the drilling platform. The closures were based on satellite images of so-called surface slick — the visible oil on the surface of the water. This metric was ultimately not sensitive enough to capture lower concentrations of oil that nevertheless were still harmful to animals.
“It’s a pretty interesting finding, and it shows that the surface slick is not a sufficient indicator of the real footprint of where the damage is occurring,” said Cameron Ainsworth, a fisheries oceanographer at the University of South Florida who was not involved in the study but has collaborated with its authors on related research.
Igal Berenshtein, a postdoctoral fellow at the University of Miami and lead author of the new study, said he originally set out to look at the effect of fishery closures on communities in the Gulf. One of the first things he did was run a model that his advisor, Claire Paris-Limouzy, developed that mapped where oil would have travelled after the spill, based on the specific conditions in the Gulf at the time. When he compared that map to the fishery closures, the results were intriguing: The model showed that oil likely traveled well beyond the bounds of the fishery closures.
When Berenshtein pored over past studies, the literature confirmed that oil had in fact been detected as far as the waters off the west coast of Florida, the Florida Keys, and Texas. That led to the question: Was the oil that spread beyond the fishery closures in high enough concentrations to be toxic to plant and animal life? And if so, what was the line between the toxic oil that satellites could detect, and the “invisible” but still toxic oil that they couldn’t?
One of the reasons for the discrepancy is the way that “toxicity” was being measured by fishery managers. “Until recently, the estimated satellite detection threshold was roughly equal to the estimated level of concern,” the paper’s authors write. But recent studies have found that organisms can be harmed at much lower concentrations due to a phenomenon called photo-induced toxicity.
After the spill, as oil floated around in the Gulf, it was exposed to ultraviolet radiation from the sun. When UV light interacts with the hydrocarbons in oil, it can produce new chemical compounds that can be more dangerous than the oil itself — especially to fish larvae and other young creatures. When the authors took this effect into account, they found that the oil concentration capable of killing many Gulf species is lower than what satellites can detect.
While satellite captures will remain essential for these kinds of calculations, according to Berenshtein, the study presents an additional framework that emergency managers can use to measure and account for the oil that’s “invisible” to satellites but still toxic to marine life. Accurate assessments of offshore drilling risk — and the effectiveness of emergency action after deadly spills — may benefit from the added precision this method can provide.
















The GOP just tried to kick hundreds of students off the voter rolls

    This year, MAGA GOP activists in Georgia attempted to disenfranchise hundreds of students by trying to kick them off the voter rolls. De...