AIPAC Is Helping Fund Anti-Bernie Sanders Super Pac Ads in Nevada

15 February 20

---

Will We Raise Funds or Challenge Injustice?

What will tomorrow bring, a day of scratching together funding, or a day of dedicating the organization's efforts to challenging the injustice that effects our daily lives. We need 700 Donations total for the drive. 700 readers visit RSN every 30 minutes.

Let’s make RSN strong.

Marc Ash
Founder, Reader Supported News

Sure, I'll make a donation!

---

Update My Monthly Donation

---

If you would prefer to send a check:
Reader Supported News
PO Box 2043
Citrus Hts
CA 95611

15 February 20

It's Live on the HomePage Now:
Reader Supported News

Yes, If You Ignore Funding RSN Will Tank - You can be 100% certain that 20,000 people reading and 15 donating (every day) is a formula that will absolutely fail. Again what we strive for is “reasonable” community participation. In earnest. / Marc Ash, Founder Reader Supported News

Sure, I'll make a donation!

---

AIPAC Is Helping Fund Anti-Bernie Sanders Super Pac Ads in Nevada

Ryan Grim and Akela Lacy, The Intercept
Excerpt: "The American Israel Public Affairs Committee is helping to fund a Super PAC launching attack ads against Sen. Bernie Sanders in Nevada on Saturday, according to two sources with knowledge of the arrangement. The ads are being run by a group called Democratic Majority for Israel, founded by longtime AIPAC strategist Mark Mellman."
READ MORE



William Barr: ‘Shrewd, deliberate, smart, calculating, careful, and full of it,’ according to the former US attorney Preet Bharara. (photo: Jim Lo Scalzo/EPA)

William Barr: How the Attorney General Became Trump's Enabler-in-Chief
Tom McCarthy, Guardian UK
McCarthy writes: "Lawyers who have filled political appointee positions in the Trump administration have been pursued by doubts about their qualifications or caliber. In 2018, a justice department staffer was made acting attorney general, the department’s top job."
READ MORE



I’ve seen Bernie Sanders stand with Vermont workers for 20 years. It’s time for unions to back him. (photo: Bill Pugliano/Getty Images)

I Know Firsthand Why Unions Should Endorse Bernie
Andrew Tripp, In These Times
Tripp writes: "One late summer evening in 2000, my home phone rang in Moretown, Vermont. 'Can you please hold for Congressman Sanders?' the voice on the line asked."
READ MORE

Shadow Inc.'s app. (photo: AP)

Documents Reveal DNC Was 'Intimately Involved' in Development of Troubled Iowa Caucus App
Hunter Walker, Yahoo News
Walker writes: "While the Democratic National Committee over the past 10 days has tried to distance itself from the troubled app that threw the results of the Iowa caucuses into disarray, a copy of the contract and internal correspondence provided to Yahoo News demonstrates that national party officials had extensive oversight over the development of the technology."
READ MORE

Prescription drugs. (photo: iStock)

The Americans Forced Into Bankruptcy to Pay for Prescriptions
Michael Sainato, Guardian UK
Sainato writes: "As a teenager, John Miller was diagnosed with Crohn’s disease, an inflammatory bowel condition that required several major surgeries to remove part of his intestine."
READ MORE

Your silence is an accomplice”, “They are killing us” or “Indifferent President” were some of the slogans wrote on the walls against the gender violence and discrimination. (photo: AP)

Mexico: Women Protest Femicides at National Palace
teleSUR
Excerpt: "A large group of women demonstrated in front of the National Palace and other places of Mexico City to protest about femicides, such as Ingrid Escamilla's, allegedly carried out by her partner, Erick Francisco, EFE News Agency reported."
READ MORE

Oil slick in the Gulf of Mexico. (photo: Chris Graythen/Getty Images)

Believe It or Not, the Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill Was Even Worse Than Previously Thought
Emily Pontecorvo, Grist
Pontecorvo writes: "After the Deepwater Horizon explosion in the spring of 2010, oil poured into the Gulf of Mexico for nearly three months straight, resulting in the worst offshore oil spill in U.S. history. More than 200 million gallons of light crude flowed into the sea, devastating marine life and fisheries."

Ten years later, scientists are still uncovering new facets of the disaster and its aftermath. A study published Wednesday from researchers at the University of Miami found that fisheries closed by federal and state agencies after the spill only accounted for about 70 percent of the actual extent of the toxicity that emanated from the drilling platform. The closures were based on satellite images of so-called surface slick — the visible oil on the surface of the water. This metric was ultimately not sensitive enough to capture lower concentrations of oil that nevertheless were still harmful to animals.

“It’s a pretty interesting finding, and it shows that the surface slick is not a sufficient indicator of the real footprint of where the damage is occurring,” said Cameron Ainsworth, a fisheries oceanographer at the University of South Florida who was not involved in the study but has collaborated with its authors on related research.

Igal Berenshtein, a postdoctoral fellow at the University of Miami and lead author of the new study, said he originally set out to look at the effect of fishery closures on communities in the Gulf. One of the first things he did was run a model that his advisor, Claire Paris-Limouzy, developed that mapped where oil would have travelled after the spill, based on the specific conditions in the Gulf at the time. When he compared that map to the fishery closures, the results were intriguing: The model showed that oil likely traveled well beyond the bounds of the fishery closures.

When Berenshtein pored over past studies, the literature confirmed that oil had in fact been detected as far as the waters off the west coast of Florida, the Florida Keys, and Texas. That led to the question: Was the oil that spread beyond the fishery closures in high enough concentrations to be toxic to plant and animal life? And if so, what was the line between the toxic oil that satellites could detect, and the “invisible” but still toxic oil that they couldn’t?

One of the reasons for the discrepancy is the way that “toxicity” was being measured by fishery managers. “Until recently, the estimated satellite detection threshold was roughly equal to the estimated level of concern,” the paper’s authors write. But recent studies have found that organisms can be harmed at much lower concentrations due to a phenomenon called photo-induced toxicity.

After the spill, as oil floated around in the Gulf, it was exposed to ultraviolet radiation from the sun. When UV light interacts with the hydrocarbons in oil, it can produce new chemical compounds that can be more dangerous than the oil itself — especially to fish larvae and other young creatures. When the authors took this effect into account, they found that the oil concentration capable of killing many Gulf species is lower than what satellites can detect.

While satellite captures will remain essential for these kinds of calculations, according to Berenshtein, the study presents an additional framework that emergency managers can use to measure and account for the oil that’s “invisible” to satellites but still toxic to marine life. Accurate assessments of offshore drilling risk — and the effectiveness of emergency action after deadly spills — may benefit from the added precision this method can provide.

READ MORE

---

Contribute to RSN 

Update My Monthly Donation