Showing posts with label DAN RATHER. Show all posts
Showing posts with label DAN RATHER. Show all posts

Sunday, March 8, 2026

‘Thank God I'm A Country Boy’

                                                                

  LOTS OF POSTS IGNORED BY BLOGGER.....

ALL POSTS ARE AVAILABLE ON

MIDDLEBORO REVIEW AND SO ON


‘Thank God I'm A Country Boy’

A Reason To Smile


Credit: Getty Images

Happy Sunday! This week’s reason to smile is one of those toe-tapping, infectious, high-energy songs that you may not know the words to, but by the second verse, you’re singing along just the same. It is John Denver’s celebration of all things country, “Thank God I’m a Country Boy.”

The song was written by John Martin Sommers, a member of Denver’s band, in December 1973. Denver recorded it 52 years ago today. It simultaneously reached number one on the country charts as well as the Hot 100.

The song is a classic Texas two-step, which may account for why it makes you feel like getting up to swing your partner. You can feel the audience buy-in during this live performance, driven by Denver’s joyful vocals and his fast-paced fiddle, replacing his ubiquitous guitar.

Denver was one of the most popular and best-selling country and folk singer-songwriters of the 1970s. AllMusic has called him “among the most beloved entertainers of his era.”

Thank God for John Denver and I too am thankful for growing up a country boy.


If you are able to, please support my team, who make pieces like this possible.


No matter how you subscribe, I thank you for reading, watching, and listening.

Stay Steady,

Dan



Tuesday, March 3, 2026

“That’s the Way It Is”

                   

  LOTS OF POSTS IGNORED BY BLOGGER.....

ALL POSTS ARE AVAILABLE ON

MIDDLEBORO REVIEW AND SO ON


RELEASED TODAY: THE US IS RUNNINNG OUT OF AMMUNITION!



Sunday, March 1, 2026

Roger Daltrey

                                                                                                                                                        

  LOTS OF POSTS IGNORED BY BLOGGER.....

ALL POSTS ARE AVAILABLE ON

MIDDLEBORO REVIEW AND SO ON


Roger Daltrey

A Reason To Smile


Credit: Getty Images

During a German bombing raid of London 82 years ago today, Irene Daltrey gave birth to a baby boy. Her son became rock legend Roger Daltrey, whose powerful voice and charismatic stage presence made The Who one of the most influential bands of the 20th century. Daltrey is this week’s reason to smile.

Almost every major music award and accolade has been bestowed on Daltrey and his bandmates — Pete Townshend, Keith Moon, and John Entwistle. In addition to winning multiple Grammys, the band was inducted into the Rock & Roll Hall of Fame, Daltrey and Townshend were given Kennedy Center Honors, and Daltrey was included on Rolling Stone’s list of 100 greatest singers. Most recently, he was knighted by King Charles III.

The Who had numerous hit songs, but we chose “My Generation” to highlight because it captures the exuberance and revolutionary spirit of the 1960s. Maybe it will inspire that feeling in young (and old) people today.

A few years back, I had the good fortune to interview Daltrey. When I asked him to pinpoint the moment he went from aspiring singer to rock star, he said it was The Who’s performance at Woodstock in 1969 that cemented their place in the rock music pantheon.

“We were a well known band, in this country and in Britain and Europe. And we’d had hit records. But Woodstock, the whole event of Woodstock, just captured people’s imaginations. It became stuff of legends. It was that one event after which life changed greatly,” Daltrey said.

As a founding member of the British Invasion, Daltrey was on the front lines of a new musical genre. “The great thing about rock and roll is that we were inventing it as we went along. It was all made on the hoof. Whatever we wanted to do, we did,” he told me.

Most people might think that headlining the Super Bowl halftime show at age 65 would be a great swan song. Not Daltrey, who once said he would never retire. And it appears he meant it. The Who is currently on a farewell tour.

I asked him how he keeps his voice concert-ready. “I do work at it,” he explained. “I have to be fit to sing our songs, Pete’s songs. It’s all about the words. What I’m really proud of is that you can listen to any Who record. You’ll hear every word.”

Happy birthday, Sir Roger!


If you are able to, please support my team, who make pieces like this possible.


No matter how you subscribe, I thank you for reading, watching, and listening.

Stay Steady,

Dan


At War with Iran

                                                                                                                                               

  LOTS OF POSTS IGNORED BY BLOGGER.....

ALL POSTS ARE AVAILABLE ON

MIDDLEBORO REVIEW AND SO ON


At War with Iran

Unprovoked, illegal, and confounding


The aftermath of an airstrike in Tehran, Iran. Credit: Getty Images

One man has made the decision to attack one of the most dangerous countries in the world. No congressional approval. No appeal to the American people. No explanation. No justification.

That man has commanded American service men and women to fight a war against Iran. And make no mistake, this is war — not a legally declared war, but one chosen by a president who promised to end foreign wars, not start them.

The U.S. military is following the orders of their commander in chief. And it is our patriotic duty to support our troops. It is also patriotic to question those in power. Why are we at war? Why now? What does victory look like? How will we know we have won, if we do? What is the exit strategy? Is there an endgame?

Those and a hundred of other questions come to mind today as we are glued to our computers, phones, and televisions, hoping for any information and praying for those in harm’s way.

The continuing airstrikes on Iran are a massive, multipronged assault in full partnership with Israel. This operation is unlike the tactical, one-day bombing of the country’s nuclear sites last June. After that attack, Trump declared Iran’s nuclear capabilities “obliterated.” Now he is claiming, just seven months later, that the Iranians are again a nuclear threat.

Where is the evidence? Neither Congress nor the American people have been shown any.

The president released an eight minute video on social media in the wee hours of the morning announcing the bombing raid, but little else has come from Mar-a-Lago, where Trump is spending the weekend. An address to the American people was planned, then canceled.

With little information from the Pentagon, The New York Times is relying on the Iranian state news agency for details. Using satellite imagery, the Islamic Republic News Agency (IRNA) believes the joint U.S.-Israeli bombing campaign hit 14 cities inside Iran, with multiple sites in the capital, Tehran.

In a Saturday morning interview with the Washington Post, Trump said the principal objective of the attack was “freedom” for the Iranian people. But then it became about regime change when reports emerged that Iran’s Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, had been killed.

Unsurprisingly, Iran retaliated with missile strikes against Israel, Jordan, Kuwait, Qatar, Bahrain, the UAE, and Saudi Arabia, so far.

Trump, not a man known for forward thinking or grasping consequences, has declared war on a country about which he knows little. Nor do we as a people, as a country, know much either.

The most pressing question right now is, do the president and those around him know what they are doing?

With that in mind, it is worth repeating to ourselves that it is our patriotic duty as citizens to support our troops, seamen, and airmen, and their families. But it is also our responsibility to keep asking the tough questions.


Please consider supporting my team’s efforts to protect our democracy through the power of independent journalism by becoming a paid subscriber. It’s one of the best deals on Substack. I thank you for your support!


No matter how you subscribe, I thank you for reading.

Stay Steady,
Dan




Friday, February 27, 2026

Trump’s Plan to Steal the Midterms

                                                                                                                              

  LOTS OF POSTS IGNORED BY BLOGGER.....

ALL POSTS ARE AVAILABLE ON

MIDDLEBORO REVIEW AND SO ON


Trump’s Plan to Steal the Midterms

Not only is it illegal, it could backfire


Credit: Getty Images

The president knows if Democrats retake one or both houses of Congress in the midterms, it’s game over for Trump 2.0. An opposition Congress would use its innumerable powers to check the Trump agenda, and, perhaps more frightening to him, spend the second half of his term investigating the deep corruption of the first half.

Donald Trump doesn’t want you to vote, especially if you’re a Democrat. It’s becoming increasingly obvious he will do anything to keep eligible Americans away from the polls.

The president has hinted at taking executive action around this issue in the past few months, but for the first time, new reporting reveals an actual plan to take away our most cherished right.

Trump’s latest gambit: direct White House lawyers to find a legal avenue to take control of the upcoming midterm elections, according to the cable network MS NOW. One ploy he is said to be considering is issuing an executive order requiring proof of citizenship to register and a photo ID to vote.

Since he can’t bend the Senate to his will to pass the SAVE Act, the most restrictive voter-suppression bill in American history, Trump reportedly is actively looking for another avenue to unilaterally assert control over U.S. elections.

Trump and the White House counsel’s office will be looking for a long time. The Constitution is clear: Article I states that administration of elections belongs to the states. And any changes to voting laws must pass through the Congress.

There is a second constitutional issue. IDs such as passports and driver’s licenses cost money. You can’t charge Americans to vote. I witnessed the effect of poll taxes designed to keep Black Americans from voting in the Deep South. The poll tax was banned by the 24th Amendment in 1964.

Trump’s own lawyers know the legal realities and warn that whatever they come up with will likely be struck down, according to White House officials who spoke with MS NOW.


According to the Washington Post, a 17-page draft executive order is being circulated throughout the White House. The EO’s premise is to claim a national emergency precipitated by the allegations that China tried to interfere with the 2020 election.

It is mighty convenient that Trump’s perpetual claims of 2020 election fraud, which have been debunked over and over again, are the crux of this latest scheme. As far as Chinese interference goes… A 2021 intelligence review found that China considered trying to influence the election but never actually did. There is no hard evidence the Chinese had anything to do with the election.

We have plenty of problems in America, but voter fraud is not one of them. Republicans and Democrats, conservatives and progressives have investigated the possibility extensively. No credible review ever found widespread election fraud or anything more than a few cases among millions of votes cast.

The Brookings Institution, a centrist think tank, decided to dive into the election integrity issue. To do so it used data collected by the Heritage Foundation, the far-right think tank that authored “Project 2025.”

Brookings found that no election outcome in the U.S. has been altered by fraud. In Pennsylvania, for example, researching 32 elections over three decades, a grand total of 39 cases of fraud were found of the 100 million votes cast. That works out to .000039%. No system is perfectly safe, but U.S. elections are pretty close.

Getting people to worry about a problem that doesn’t exist is classic Trump. “They want to cheat. They have cheated. And their policy is so bad that the only way they can get elected is to cheat. And we’re going to stop it,” Trump said of Democrats during his speech on Tuesday. Does he understand the old saying, “The pot calling the kettle black?”

During the run-up to the 2024 presidential campaign, Trump repeatedly tried to sow seeds of doubt about the integrity of the election. “Those involved in unscrupulous behavior will be sought out, caught, and prosecuted at levels, unfortunately, never seen before in our Country,” he wrote on social media.

Miraculously, when he won, all talk of voter fraud ceased.

Now, about the premise that requiring proof of citizenship to register and ID to vote will hurt Democrats and help Republicans. During non-presidential elections, voter turnout drops considerably. In low-turnout elections Democrats historically do better than Republicans.

But Trump is like a dog with a bone when he gets an idea into his head. So no one is going to convince him otherwise.

In an interview with Newsmax after Tuesday’s State of the Union address, Speaker of the House Mike Johnson said, “If we lose the midterms, heaven forbid, it would be the end of the Trump presidency in a real effect.”

For many Americans, the reaction to that statement would be, “From his lips to God’s ear.”

Please consider supporting my team’s efforts to protect our democracy through the power of independent journalism by becoming a paid subscriber. It’s one of the best deals on Substack. I thank you for your support!


No matter how you subscribe, I thank you for reading.

Stay Steady,
Dan



Monday, February 23, 2026

Supreme Court Finally Checks Trump

                                                                   

  LOTS OF POSTS IGNORED BY BLOGGER.....

ALL POSTS ARE AVAILABLE ON

MIDDLEBORO REVIEW AND SO ON


Supreme Court Finally Checks Trump

The president's ire is fueling his flailing response


Credit: Getty Images

Before Donald Trump tries to convince you otherwise on Tuesday night, the state of our union is appalling. That’s not just me saying so; a majority of the American people say so too.

If you believe the polls — and they are remarkably consistent on this — this president is in a lot of trouble. He’s underwater on every issue, especially the economy, and his disapproval rating is hovering around 60%.

It is difficult to understand why roughly 40% of the American people are still buying the unrelenting nonsense and lies coming from this White House. But we’ve seen it before. During Richard Nixon’s final days in office, his approval rating was in the low 30s. Even criminal presidents can count on an unwavering base of support.

So, can Trump go lower? Yes. And he will only have himself to blame, though he seems to be incapable of such introspection.

Even after the Supreme Court handed him a seismic defeat on tariffs on Friday, he has not acquiesced. Instead of shifting gears, Trump is performing his signature move: the double down.

Trump immediately announced he plans to impose a 10% global tariff under a different statute than the one the Court recently struck down. In true Trump fashion, he quickly upped it to a 15% tariff across-the-board. Like the old ones, these new tariffs will be challenged in court.

Polls suggest that many Americans are paying close attention to tariffs, Trump’s signature economic policy, blaming him and the tariffs for rising prices everywhere. Many Republicans running in November breathed a sign of relief after the Supreme Court decision, but that relief will likely be short-lived.

Matthew Bartlett, a Republican strategist and former Trump State Department official, thinks the president can’t see the ocean for the waves. “It’s very possible that the Supreme Court just threw Trump’s economy a life preserver, and the president is refusing it and demanding an anchor. These tariffs economically have not played well into the affordability narrative,” he told Politico.

Ah, that pesky affordability narrative. President Joe Biden ran into the same problem. On paper, the economy looks good. But no matter how well the stock market is doing, or GDP is growing, if you can’t afford to put a proper dinner on the table or buy medicine for your kids, it is meaningless.

What was made manifestly clear in the 2024 presidential election, Americans vote with their pocketbooks in mind, not their stock portfolios.

Friday’s Supreme Court decision was more than a possible life preserver for Trump. It was one for the history books, for several reasons.

In the 6-3 decision, Justices Amy Coney Barrett and Neil Gorsuch, both appointed by the president, joined Chief Justice John Roberts and the Court’s three liberal justices in rejecting the Trump tariffs. It was one of the first times the Court displayed judicial independence and imposed a real check on Trump’s blatant power grab, directing him to stay in his constitutional lane.


For the first time during Trump’s second term, the Court issued a merits decision, one that was based solely on the legality of the president’s executive actions.

This striking rebuke of the president is a 180-degree turn from what has essentially been a rubber stamp for many of Trump’s policies. Is the Court actually turning a corner? Perhaps.

Friday’s ruling came two months after the Court’s decision in Trump v. Illinois, where it denied the Trump administration’s request to stay a lower court injunction, blocking the federal deployment of National Guard troops in Illinois.

Though no decision has been issued yet, during oral arguments in Trump v. Cook, a case challenging Trump’s firing of Federal Reserve Board governor Lisa Cook, most of the justices seem skeptical of the government’s arguments.

Justice Neil Gorsuch, appointed by Trump in 2017, has been described by the Los Angeles Times as “a wild card,” who tends “to go his own way.” On Friday, he sided with the majority while also writing a concurring opinion, in which he took his fellow conservative justices to task for their dissent.

In the dissenting opinion, Justice Brett Kavanaugh claimed that, “Presidents have long been granted substantial discretion over tariffs.”

Gorsuch disagreed, pointing to the founding of our country. “Americans fought the Revolution in no small part because they believed that only their elected representatives (not the King, not even Parliament) possessed authority to tax them… Americans later codified these beliefs in the Constitution,” he wrote.

He went on, “For those who think it important for the nation to impose more tariffs, I understand that today’s decision will be disappointing. All I can offer them is that most major decisions affecting the rights and responsibilities of the American people (including the duty to pay taxes and tariffs) are funneled through the legislative process for a reason.”

It is about time someone reminded Congress of its constitutional duties. Trump’s executive overreach can be stopped, as demonstrated by this Supreme Court decision. It will take more decisions like this one and more members of Congress stepping up and telling the president no. Their jobs, and our country, depend on it.

Please consider supporting my team’s efforts to protect our democracy through the power of independent journalism by becoming a paid subscriber. It’s one of the best deals on Substack. I thank you for your support!

No matter how you subscribe, I thank you for reading.

Stay Steady,
Dan



Sunday, February 22, 2026

‘Stand by Me’

                             

  LOTS OF POSTS IGNORED BY BLOGGER.....

ALL POSTS ARE AVAILABLE ON

MIDDLEBORO REVIEW AND SO ON


‘Stand by Me’

A Reason To Smile


The song “Stand by Me” by Ben E. King was a huge hit when it was released in 1961. It found a second life in the late 1980s when it appeared on the soundtrack of “Stand by Me,” a film directed by Rob Reiner. Twenty-six years after the song was released, it topped the charts for a second time. And 39 years later, it is our reason to smile.

King, a rhythm and blues singer-songwriter, was the lead singer of The Drifters, one of the most prolific hit-makers in the early days of popular music. Their songs included, “Under the Boardwalk,” “Save the Last Dance for Me,” and “Up on the Roof.” But not “Stand by Me.” King recorded and released it as a solo hit after the Drifters passed on it.

The song isn’t just popular at weddings and graduation parties. It is numbered among the Recording Industry Association of America’s 25 Songs of the Century. The original recording was inducted into the National Recording Registry by the Library of Congress, which called it “culturally, historically, or aesthetically significant.” There are 400 known recordings of the song by a diverse set of singers from John Lennon to Tracy Chapman. Even Muhammad Ali recorded a version for the B-side of 45 he released.

The song is so beloved because its lyrics convey a comforting message of friendship and support. The melody is timeless and its iconic rhythmic bass line is instantly recognizable.

It may not surprise you that the song’s simple lyrics have biblical origins. “Stand by Me” was inspired by a gospel hymn of the same name, which in turn was based on Psalm 46: “Therefore, will not we fear, though the Earth be removed, and though the mountains be carried into the midst of the sea.”

The song reminds us all of the importance of finding strength in others during hard times, that we are all in this together.


If you are able to, please support my team, who make pieces like this possible.


No matter how you subscribe, I thank you for reading, watching, and listening.

Stay Steady,

Dan



Fetterman texts appear to show lack of interest in duties as senator

                                                                              LOTS OF POSTS IGNORED BY BLOGGER..... OR REMOVED ON THEIR WHIM...