Wednesday, June 29, 2022

RSN: FOCUS: Laurence H. Tribe and Dennis Aftergut | Does Justice Clarence Thomas Want to Overturn a Landmark Freedom of the Press Ruling?

 


 

Reader Supported News
29 June 22

Live on the homepage now!
Reader Supported News

IT’S NOT “FUNDRAISING” ANYMORE, IT’S SURVIVAL CASH — You can be sure funding, or the lack thereof has our undivided attention. Due to a prolonged funding drought we are in financial crisis mode. You can expect us to maintain high standards. You can also expect us to be very focused on stabilizing our financial situation. This gets fixed by people donating.
Marc Ash • Founder, Reader Supported News

Sure, I'll make a donation!

 

Clarence Thomas. (photo: Jonathan Ernst/Reuters)
FOCUS: Laurence H. Tribe and Dennis Aftergut | Does Justice Clarence Thomas Want to Overturn a Landmark Freedom of the Press Ruling?
Laurence H. Tribe and Dennis Aftergut, Guardian UK
Excerpt: "On Monday, tucked away in a busy news cycle, was a quiet, subtle but no less terrifying judicial development. US supreme court justice Clarence Thomas laid out the formula for destroying the free press."

On Monday, the supreme court justice issued a worrying signal about his commitment to maintaining press freedoms

On Monday, tucked away in a busy news cycle, was a quiet, subtle but no less terrifying judicial development. US supreme court justice Clarence Thomas laid out the formula for destroying the free press.

Thomas dissented to denial of certiorari in Coal Ridge Ministries Media v Southern Poverty Law Center with an opinion giving us more than a hint of precisely what he has in store. Freedom of the press has a rightwing target on its back. Thomas wrote that the court should “revisit” the landmark free press case of the 20th century, New York Times v Sullivan.

“Revisit” is judicial talk for “overrule”.

Thomas asserted that “New York Times and its progeny have allowed media organizations and interest groups ‘to cast false aspersions on public figures with near impunity’.” He offered no evidence and made no argument in defense of his claim that the existing burdens on those who sue for defamation are indeed excessive, given the competing interests at stake.

Make no mistake. Overruling Times v Sullivan to make it much easier for public figures to sue their critics would strangle the media’s ability to report freely and speak critically about public figures, especially elected officials.

L B Sullivan was a city police commissioner in Montgomery, Alabama, who sued the Times and 60 eminent Americans over a full-page 1960 ad they had placed to raise money for Martin Luther King Jr’s budding civil rights movement. The ad called police actions against nonviolent protestors in Montgomery “an unprecedented wave of terror”.

That perspective wasn’t shared by all, but the ad was spot on in terms of accuracy except for some relatively immaterial factual errors. In the end, the court unanimously tossed out a $500,000 verdict against the Times on the grounds that a public official, to prove libel, must show that a publisher acted with knowledge that its statement was factually false or made with reckless disregard for the truth – what the law calls the “actual malice” standard.

The court wrote of America’s “profound national commitment to the principle that debate on public issues should be uninhibited, robust, and wide-open”. Such debate, the court reasoned, requires “breathing room” for mistakes. Otherwise, the threat of defamation actions would chill robust public debate.

The chill is real. Imagine if, to terrify critics, political figures such as Donald Trump could weaponize the negligence standard Thomas would have the court install in place of the higher barrier that “actual malice” represents.

There is so much of great importance that we might never have learned. Case in point: the meager amount of factual material that would have been published about 6 January under the chill that a Thomas standard would generate might not have sufficed for the special House committee or the justice department to pursue an investigation of Trump’s role in the insurrection or of his role in the attempted coup of which the insurrection was a part.

Think of Cassidy Hutchinson as today’s Alexander Butterfield, the Nixon aide who told the 1973 congressional select committee on Watergate of the existence of White House tape recordings that brought Nixon down. That might never have happened but for the freedom of the press made real by New York Times v Sullivan nearly a decade earlier.

If you need to pull one small thread from the now multi-layered evidentiary embroidery of the Trump saga that the current hearings are disclosing, consider this: two days after the insurrection, the media published reports that Trump was “gleeful” and “delighted” at the 6 January violence, a critical strand of criminal intent evidence should he be prosecuted for insurrection. The information came from White House insiders. Would they have shared it had there not been a significant legal deterrent to Trump falsely suing them for slander – New York Times v Sullivan?

We may never know those who were the sources. But today, a brave 25-year-old woman – far more courageous than her former boss, Mark Meadows – told us under oath that the glee was real. She testified that Trump said after hearing of the “hang Mike Pence” by Capitol invaders, that “Mike deserves it.”

She was in the room where it happened.

The history of 20th century totalitarianism tells us that to rule absolutely, strongmen need to destroy the press to keep truth from the public. Thomas’ dissent is effectively inviting litigants like Sarah Palin, who is appealing her loss, to help him pave that road to American carnage.

Thomas’ signal is a warning. There is comfort in the fact that he signed his dissent alone and in the prospect that a people alert to dangerous signs can keep their republic if they keep up their guard.



READ MORE

 

Contribute to RSN

Follow us on facebook and twitter!

Update My Monthly Donation

PO Box 2043 / Citrus Heights, CA 95611






give me a $5?

 

I’m about to ask you to chip in $5 to my grassroots campaign. But first, a few facts about this battleground race:

1. Ohio’s open Senate seat will decide if we’re able to hold and expand our slim Democratic majority. A 50/50 Senate has failed to protect abortion, so we can’t afford to lose a single competitive race like this one.

2. I’m leading Republican JD Vance by just 2 points. Polling shows that Ohioans support our plan to cut workers in on the deal—the more we’re able to get our message out, the more voters we’ll win over.

3. National Republicans are funneling millions of dollars into Ohio. One right-wing billionaire even dropped $15 million into a super PAC backing Vance.

4. We’re heading into a summer fundraising slump, and we need to post strong numbers this quarter. Republicans will jump at the opportunity to drown out our workers first message with their BS smear campaigns.

We need to raise another $82,961 by tomorrow to stay on track to win this neck-and-neck race. So, will you rush in just $5 right now?


Together, I know we can pull this off.

—Tim

 

We believe that emails are the best way for our organization to stay in touch with supporters like you. 

If you'd like to make a donation to our campaign, you can do that below!

Donate Monthly
Donate Once
 
Paid for by Tim Ryan for Ohio

Tim Ryan for Ohio
P.O. Box 189
Niles, Ohio 44446
United States

 



 





We’re falling behind

 

Tomorrow night is our most important quarterly FEC deadline so far this cycle and we’ve got bad news.

We set a fundraising goal that we were certain our grassroots team could meet, but we just looked at the numbers and it looks like our momentum has slowed down. And with so many important fights ahead, it’s critical that we get back on track.

Republicans will continue to use minority rule to block the Senate from protecting abortion access, expanding voting rights, passing gun safety legislation, and more. That’s why it’s so important that we expand our majority this November by defeating Ron Johnson and electing a pro-choice Democrat in his place. But we can’t do it without your help.

Rush a donation of $10 or more before our end-of-quarter deadline expires at midnight tomorrow and power our work to flip Ron Johnson’s seat this November


Thanks in advance.

— Team Baldwin

PAID FOR BY TAMMY BALDWIN FOR SENATE

Tammy Baldwin for Senate
P.O. Box 696
Madison, WI 53701
United States





Asking for something a little different than usual

 

Hello Tony! We're emailing to ask for something a little different than usual this evening.

As you may know, tomorrow at midnight is our official June FEC fundraising deadline. And we've got a bit of a problem on our hands.

This month, it looks like we're on pace to reach our individual contribution goal. That's great! But the average donation amount from each of those contributions has dropped... considerably.

This time last year? It was about $29. This time last quarter? Just over $25. But so far this month, we're at $19 and some change.

Now, that difference might not seem like a big deal, but over the course of an entire FEC deadline, it adds up to a LOT.

These are resources we need to continue building our movement and help Ed keep up the fight for our bold agenda in the Senate. So what can we do? The way we see it, with the clock ticking down there are two options:

1. LOTS more donations from lots more people.
2. Donations made in (even slightly!) higher amounts than usual.

Normally when we ask supporters to make their first online contribution, we ask for $3. But since we've fallen off the pace here in June, we need to up the ante. We need to ask you to do something big today:

Can you to add your $10 contribution to Ed Markey's re-election campaign before tomorrow's FEC deadline? Every donation will go directly toward organizing our movement and building progressive power nationwide.

Thanks for chipping in today if you can. We know it's a big ask, but we hope you take it as a sign of how important your support is to this campaign.

- Team Markey




 


Paid for by The Markey Committee

The Markey Committee
PO Box 120029
Boston, MA 02112
United States






SHOCKING new poll out of Georgia

 

Keep Georgia Blue: A Blue Wave America Project.

BREAKING: Raphael Warnock is tied in the polls with his far‑right opponent!

Poll: Walker and Warnock both at 46%

CHIP IN NOW TO SAVE OUR SENATE MAJORITY >>

Donald Trump is DESPERATE to defeat Raphael Warnock this November and replace him with his handpicked Republican candidate.

Walker: THANK YOU to my friend President Trump for your support and encouragement! Together, we will win back the U.S. Senate for GEORGIA!!

If he succeeds, Republicans will take our Senate majority and reverse all of the progress we have worked so hard for over the last two years.

So we’re power-fundraising to make sure Democrats like Raphael Warnock are victorious this November!

Election Day is less than FIVE MONTHS AWAY! Please chip in any amount now to save the Senate majority:

We can’t slow down now!

 
Blue Wave America
PAID FOR BY BLUE WAVE AMERICA (BLUEWAVEAMERICA.ORG)
AND NOT AUTHORIZED BY ANY CANDIDATE OR CANDIDATE'S COMMITTEE
Copyright 2022 Blue Wave America
P.O. Box 4519
Frankfort, KY 40604


Our email newsletter is the best way to stay in touch with our work to defeat rural Republicans and usher in a new Blue Wave in 2022.





Justice Clarence Thomas has publicly stated that the Court needs to attack more of our rights

 

Real Justice

The right to an abortion won’t be the last right taken away by the conservative Supreme Court.

Justice Clarence Thomas has publicly stated that the Court needs to attack our right to contraception, same-sex marriage, and same-sex relationships. 

This is not just a headline, this is a warning of what’s to come if we do not act right now.

If they take away our rights, it’s going to be District Attorneys that are the first line of defense in refusing to prosecute people for exercising their civil rights. 

That’s why we need to make sure we have as many strong, pro-choice DAs as possible in place by the next session.

In fact, we have 3 DA races coming up fast, and will be making 3 more key endorsements in important DA races next week. And our conservative opponents who spent millions to oppose us in San Francisco are watching and ready to use their war chest to stop us.

Can you help us fight back by making a donation to our DA Abortion Defense Fund right now? Every dollar you give will go straight to defending against attacks and giving tangible support to DA campaigns.

We are watching in real-time as Supreme Court conservatives work to take away so much of the progress we have made for civil rights in the country for the past 50 years. 

It’s why we need to take Clarence Thomas' threats VERY seriously and do the work now to prepare for the possibility that even more of our rights will be slashed. 

After Roe v. Wade was overturned, it’s clear that we simply can’t wait for Congress to protect our rights. 

That is why we have to focus our time and energy on defending our DAs who are already working to protect women at the local level.  

The amount we raise over the next few days will determine just how much power we have to support our current and hopeful DAs.

So, please make a donation of anything you can afford right now to our DA Abortion Defense Fund. Every single dollar you give goes to electing pro-choice DAs ready to fight for abortion rights.

Thank you,

Real Justice

P.S. Learn about some of our DAs and their stances on abortion here.






 
Like on FacebookFollow on TwitterFollow on Instagram

Pol. Adv. Paid for by Real Justice PAC, realjusticepac.org

Not authorized by any federal, state, or local candidate or a committee controlled by a candidate.

Email us: info@realjusticepac.org






Our $200,000 goal

 

Squad Victory Fund


Our goal this quarter is to raise $200,000 to support Alexandria, Ilhan, Rashida, and Ayanna’s re-election campaigns and continue building vital progressive infrastructure nationwide.

Unfortunately, our fundraising has slowed down, and we’re a bit behind where we need to be to reach our goal before tomorrow’s deadline.

But here's the good news: If two people from 02346 chip in, then we can catch up and get back on track to reaching our $200,000 end-of-quarter goal.

If you can afford it, will you be one of the two people from 02346 we need to make a contribution in order to get our fundraising back on track and support the Squad’s re-election?


The Squad Victory Fund is supported completely by grassroots contributions. Our average contribution is just $21.60 — and we’re proud of that. We’re fueled by grassroots donors chipping in what they can because they believe in fighting for bold, transformative policies like restoring abortion rights nationwide, student debt cancellation, a Green New Deal, and Medicare for All.

This is the last quarterly deadline before the Squad’s primary elections — and it’s one of the last before the general election in November. We have to make sure Alexandria, Ilhan, Rashida, and Ayanna have the resources they need to continue engaging voters across their districts, organize, and win. We can’t let super PACs or corporate special interests decide the outcome of these elections.

Help send the full Squad back to Congress by chipping in any amount that is meaningful to you. Every contribution — no matter the amount — helps build our collective power for bold, progressive change.

Thank you for your support,

Squad Victory Fund






 

Donate

Paid for by The Squad Victory Fund, a joint fundraising committee authorized by Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez for Congress, Ilhan for Congress, The Committee to Elect Ayanna Pressley, Rashida Tlaib for Congress, Courage to Change, Inspiring Leadership Has a Name PAC, Power of Us PAC, and Rooted in Community Leadership PAC.

In addition to what’s legally required, The Squad Victory Fund does not accept contributions from: (1) corporations, associations, or their PACs; (2) individuals registered as federal lobbyists or under FARA; (3) from the PACs, lobbyists, or SEC-named executives of fossil fuel companies; or (4) from the Fraternal Order of Police.

Contributions or gifts to The Squad Victory Fund are not tax deductible.

Contributions to The Squad Victory Fund will be allocated as follows: 12.5% to each of Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez for Congress, Ilhan for Congress, The Committee to Elect Ayanna Pressley, Rashida Tlaib for Congress, Courage to Change, Inspiring Leadership Has a Name PAC, Power of Us PAC, and Rooted in Community Leadership PAC.

Any contributor may designate their contribution for a particular participant. The allocation formula above may change if any contributor makes a contribution that, when allocated, would exceed the amount that the contributor may lawfully give to any participant.

After contributing to The Squad Victory Fund, you will automatically be signed up to receive email updates from Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez for Congress, Ilhan for Congress, The Committee to Elect Ayanna Pressley, and Rashida Tlaib for Congress. You may of course opt-out by unsubscribing at any time.

Email us: info@squadvictoryfund.com





POLITICO NIGHTLY: Jan. 6 committee closes in on Pat Cipollone

 

View in browser
 
POLITICO Nightly logo

BY JOANNE KENEN

Presented by

Meta

With help from Myah Ward

BREAKING — After weeks of publicly calling on former White House Counsel Pat Cipollone to cooperate with the investigation, the Jan. 6 committee subpoenaed him this evening for a deposition scheduled for July 6.

During her testimony on Tuesday, White House aide Cassidy Hutchinson described an explosive account in which Cipollone warned of legal culpability if Donald Trump followed his supporters on a march to the White House. Hutchinson has also testified to the committee that Cipollone repeatedly expressed legal misgivings about Trump’s efforts to send false presidential electors to Congress and various other aspects of his bid to stay in power on Jan. 6, when Congress met to count electoral votes, write Betsy Woodruff SwanNicholas Wu and Kyle Cheney.

An abortion rights protester wears earings made out of birth control pills.

An abortion rights protester wears earrings made out of birth control pills at the Federal Courthouse on Friday, June 24, 2022, in Houston. | Karen Warren/Houston Chronicle via AP

SLIPPERY SLOPE — Abortion, not contraception, is the red-hot political issue.

Abortion motivates people to vote. Cervical caps do not.

But birth control is going to be more and more important as abortion becomes more difficult — and for many, impossible — to access. And given Justice Clarence Thomas’ call to reconsider the right to contraception, at least some forms of family planning may be the next legal and political battleground.

Even now, contraception isn’t always easy to access, particularly for people who are young, low-income or uninsured. Clinics are underfunded, and in some parts of the country, not easily accessible — particularly in states rushing to ban abortion.

And while banning forms of contraception may seem like a reach, some of the groups who successfully battled for the end of Roe also regard certain forms of contraception as methods of early abortion — even though mainstream medical and public health groups say that is not the case.

That includes IUDs, or intrauterine devices, and emergency contraceptives, sometimes called the “morning after pill.” People often confuse emergency contraceptive pills, which can be obtained in a pharmacy to prevent a pregnancy after unprotected sex, with the abortion pill, which is prescribed to terminate a pregnancy during the first 10 weeks. But they are not the same.

No contraception is 100 percent effective, and this is one of the slippery undercurrents in the abortion debate — a belief in some circles that unplanned pregnancies occur when people are irresponsible or careless.

But sometimes birth control fails. Even sterilization, on rare occasions, fails. IUDs occasionally don’t work. (Sometimes they really don’t work — a couple I know got their twins that way.) The CDC publishes the failure rate of all the major forms of family planning. Sometimes people have bad luck. Sometimes they don’t use their birth control perfectly.

There are still obstacles to getting contraception, and that’s where the policy tension may play out in multiple states.

The Affordable Care Act required health plans to cover birth control at no cost — but not everyone is insured, so that benefit doesn’t reach them. Among the uninsured are low-income women in 12 states, including Texas and Florida, that have refused to expand Medicaid under the ACA.

Title X family planning clinics, which are federally funded, can fill the gaps. But Congress hasn’t appropriated as much money as the Biden administration has requested. In fact, the gap is wide; family planning groups say federal spending is not even half of what’s needed. So not everyone who needs contraception can get it easily and affordably. Not everyone lives near a Title X clinic. (I visited one such clinic in Texas this spring, part of a POLITICO Magazine story I did with my colleague Alice Miranda Ollstein. It was not clear that it could remain open. Recently I clicked on another region of southwest Texas on a map and searched for the nearest Title X clinic. It was 95 miles away).

This week the Biden administration — though limited in what it can do to address the Supreme Court Roe v. Wade ruling — took two steps to boost contraception. First, Health and Human Services Secretary Xavier Becerra and Labor Secretary Marty Walsh met with 14 insurers and health payers to make sure the contraceptive coverage mandate was being followed. Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen then joined them in a follow-up letter to health insurers reminding them that it’s not an option. It’s the law.

“Any violation of this requirement will not be tolerated,” Becerra told them. “We are calling on your organizations to remove barriers and ensure individuals in your plans have access to the contraceptive coverage they need, as required by law.”

A day later, Becerra unveiled a new government website, in English and Spanish, called ReproductiveRights.gov to help people find Title X and community health clinics. It’s a useful tool. It’s also a reminder that for too many people, contraception is not just around the corner.

Welcome to POLITICO Nightly. Reach out with news, tips and ideas at nightly@politico.com. Or contact tonight’s on Twitter at @JoanneKenen.

A message from Meta:

Doctors can practice high-risk situations risk-free in the metaverse

In the metaverse, future surgeons will be able to practice advanced procedures hundreds of times before seeing real patients – helping them gain experience and master their skills.

The metaverse may be virtual, but the impact will be real.

Learn how Meta is helping build the metaverse.

 
WHAT'D I MISS?

— Secret Service says Jan. 6 committee didn’t reach out before Hutchinson’s explosive Trump testimony: Anthony Guglielmi, the service’s chief of communications, told POLITICO that select committee investigators did not ask Secret Service personnel to reappear or answer questions in writing in the 10 days before asking Hutchinson at the hearing about an alleged physical altercation between Trump and his security detail on the day of the riot. “[W]e were not asked to reappear before the Committee in response to yesterday’s new information and we plan on formally responding on the record,” he wrote in an email. “We have and will continue to make any member of the Secret Service available.”

— Breyer will retire Thursday: The retirement paves the way for Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson, confirmed in April to fill Breyer’s forthcoming vacancy, to join Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan on the court’s left-leaning bloc. Jackson, the court’s first Black female justice, faced contentious confirmation hearings before being confirmed with a 53-47 vote by the Senate. Jackson will be sworn in at noon immediately after Breyer’s official retirement.

Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer listens during a forum.

Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer listens during a forum. | Steven Senne, File/AP Photo

— Abortion pill maker plans multistate legal action to preserve drug access: Ken Parsigian of Latham & Watkins wouldn’t disclose where GenBioPro plans to file lawsuits but told POLITICO that an FDA drug approval should trump any state moves to limit access to mifepristone. The company is currently challenging a Mississippi law that effectively banned telehealth abortions by making patients see doctors in person to obtain the medication, even though the FDA ended its requirement that the pill be personally doled out in 2021. Related: Searches for abortion medications have soared.

— Giuliani’s former Ukraine fixer gets 20 months in prison: Lev Parnas, an associate of Rudy Giuliani who was a figure in Trump’s first impeachment investigation, was sentenced today to a year and eight months in prison for fraud and campaign finance crimes. The judge also ordered Parnas to pay $2.3 million in restitution.

— New turmoil rocks crypto as court orders hedge fund to liquidate: A British Virgin Islands court has ordered the crypto hedge fund Three Arrows Capital to liquidate its assets, another blow to digital asset markets that are already cratering amid the collapse of once-high-flying startups. The unwinding of Three Arrows, which had been one of the industry’s top investment firms, will likely spell big trouble for lending platforms and digital asset businesses whose finances are tied to the beleaguered hedge fund’s balance sheet.

 

DON'T MISS DIGITAL FUTURE DAILY - OUR TECHNOLOGY NEWSLETTER, RE-IMAGINED:  Technology is always evolving, and our new tech-obsessed newsletter is too! Digital Future Daily unlocks the most important stories determining the future of technology, from Washington to Silicon Valley and innovation power centers around the world. Readers get an in-depth look at how the next wave of tech will reshape civic and political life, including activism, fundraising, lobbying and legislating. Go inside the minds of the biggest tech players, policymakers and regulators to learn how their decisions affect our lives. Don't miss out, subscribe today.

 
 
AROUND THE NATION

WHY COLORADO MATTERS ON ABORTION POLITICS — Colorado might be a reliably blue state on the national level, but both parties are zeroing in on control of the state Legislature in a test of whether abortion politics will matter come November, writes Nightly’s Myah Ward.

The fate of abortion rights in the state will come down to which party holds the power in both chambers. Holding the Democratic majority is one of the Democratic Legislative Campaign Committee’s top priorities this cycle, Jessica Post, president of the group, which is charged with helping elect Democrats to state legislatures, told Nightly a couple of weeks ago. And its counterpart, the Republican State Leadership Committee, has named Colorado one of its targets for a potential GOP flip.

The fall of Roe v. Wade added another layer to this fight. After a 24-hour Republican-led filibuster, Colorado Democrats passed the Reproductive Health Equity Act this year, enshrining the right to an abortion in law and making the state an abortion safe haven in the region. All Republicans, in both chambers, voted against the bill.

Now, with abortion rights on the line in November, Democrats are pushing the narrative that the issue will carry voters all the way to the polls this fall — especially in states like Colorado, where the party is at risk of losing power and the abortion protection laws that come along with statehouse control.

“Republicans just elevated an issue that deeply angers and motivates the Democratic base and repels swing voters,” Post said. “So heading into a tough election cycle, that really matters.”

State Republicans, on the other hand, are figuring out exactly how to talk about abortion — and whether or not to talk about it at all. Some Senate Republicans, though it’s easy to dig up their past anti-abortion comments, have avoided responding to Friday’s Supreme Court ruling altogether. Sens. Dennis Hisey and Rob Woodward, two Republicans who ran uncontested Tuesday night, haven’t released statements.

“I tell the candidates I’m working with, ‘Look, if you’re talking about abortion, you’re talking about what the Democrats want you talking about, which is keeping you from talking about the stuff they don’t want you talking about, which is the cost of living here,’” Greg Brophy, a GOP strategist and former Colorado state legislator, told Nightly.

Shana Black, who won last night’s primary for Colorado House District 18 against anti-abortion candidate Summer Groubert, shared the Dobbs decision on her campaign Facebook page on Friday, writing, “It’s official, a 6-3 decision!” Black later deleted the post, according to a screenshot of her Facebook page from the DLCC.

As Republicans shift to campaigning for November against Democrats, it’s likely they’ll zero in on issues like inflation and crime. Even the RSLC has stayed quiet on the Dobbs decision — aside from a fundraising email to supporters — until today, when the group published a poll, highlighting the idea that abortion trails behind inflation, the economy and facrime when it comes to top issues for voters — another indicator of GOP strategy heading into the post-Roe midterms for Colorado’s Legislature and statehouses across the country.

“I don’t think [the Supreme Court ruling] will have a negative impact, a significant negative impact on Republicans flipping the Colorado Senate,” Brophy said. “Or maybe even flipping the House, as long as the candidates stay on message.”

 

A message from Meta:

Advertisement Image 

 
NIGHTLY NUMBER

2

The remaining number of Supreme Court opinions this term, scheduled to be announced on Thursday. We’re awaiting contentious decisions on the Environmental Protection climate authority case and Biden’s “remain in Mexico” policy appeal.

AROUND THE WORLD

President Joe Biden speaks.

PUTIN GETS ‘NATOIZATION’ OF EUROPE — The U.S. will send more destroyers, air defense systems and redeploy troops further east in the coming months, President Joe Biden announced today at NATO’s annual summit in Madrid.

“I said Putin’s looking for the Finlandization of Europe,” Biden said. “He’s going to get the NATOization of Europe. And that is exactly what he didn’t want, but exactly what needs to be done to guarantee security for Europe. And I think it’s necessary.”

The moves will add significant firepower to the continent and signal a deepened American commitment to NATO’s eastern front countries, which are worried Russia could continue its march westward if they’re successful in Ukraine, writes Paul McLeary.

PARIS TERRORIST JAILED FOR LIFE Salah Abdeslam, the only surviving member of the group that carried out the November 2015 Paris terror attacks, was found guilty of murder today and sentenced to life in prison without parole — France’s harshest penalty, write Luanna Muniz and Julie Tomiche.

Nineteen others were also convicted — six in absentia — for the roles they played in what was the worst terrorist attack during peacetime on French soil and the worst in Europe since the Madrid train bombings of 2004. Some 130 people were killed and hundreds more injured in the carnage that was unleashed via suicide bombs and shootings across Paris — at the Bataclan concert hall, around the Stade de France sports stadium and on bar terraces.

The verdicts bring to a close one of the longest criminal trials in France since World War II, lasting some 10 months and involving 2,500 plaintiffs — nearly 400 of whom took the stand to testify.

Abdeslam’s sentence of life imprisonment without parole was also rare, only handed down in modern France four times before.

 

Industry Leaders at One-Day Tech Event on July 21: The American dream is a MerITocracy – powered by policy and technology as they relate to education and workforce, global competitiveness, security and privacy, and citizen services. On July 21, join tech industry visionaries from Dell, Google Cloud, DocuSign, and Consumer Technology Association, in addition to Hill and Biden Administration leaders as they discuss the future of tech innovation, regulation, and outcomes for America at MeriTalk’s MerITocracy 2022: American Innovation Forum. Sign up here.

 
 
PARTING WORDS

IMMIGRATION’S ‘UVALDE MOMENT’ — Senate Majority Whip Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) said he has restarted his immigration reform talks with Sen. Thom Tillis (R-N.C.) while the senators have been traveling together throughout Europe this week, writes Andrew Desiderio from Madrid.

Those talks were put on hold while Tillis negotiated with Democrats on the gun safety legislation that the Senate and House passed last week, but Durbin, the Senate Judiciary chair, told POLITICO at the NATO Summit in Madrid that it’s now top of mind for him.

“We’ve been talking the last couple days about reviving that effort,” Durbin said in an interview. “And I think what happened at the border with finding 51 dead migrants in that tractor trailer is what I would call a ‘Uvalde moment.’ I hope it sparks an interest in finding a bipartisan approach to dealing with immigration.”

Did someone forward this email to you? Sign up here

A message from Meta:

The metaverse may be virtual, but the impact will be real

Meta is helping build the metaverse so aviation mechanics will be able to practice servicing different jet engines – preparing them for any complex job.

The result: A more skilled workforce.

Learn how Meta is helping build the metaverse.

 
 

Follow us on Twitter

Myah Ward @myahward

Naomi Andu @naomiandu

 

FOLLOW US

Follow us on FacebookFollow us on TwitterFollow us on InstagramListen on Apple Podcast
 


 POLITICO, LLC 1000 Wilson Blvd. Arlington, VA, 22209, USA





The GOP just tried to kick hundreds of students off the voter rolls

    This year, MAGA GOP activists in Georgia attempted to disenfranchise hundreds of students by trying to kick them off the voter rolls. De...