Showing posts with label BERNIE KERIK. Show all posts
Showing posts with label BERNIE KERIK. Show all posts

Saturday, September 2, 2023

Giuliani Was in the Running to Be Trump’s Attorney General. His Authoritarian Rule as Mayor Suggests a Nightmare Outcome

 SUBSCRIBE TO THIS NEWSLETTER TO RECEIVE TIMELY REPORTS 

Giuliani Was in the Running to Be Trump’s Attorney General. His Authoritarian Rule as Mayor Suggests a Nightmare Outcome

By Pam Martens: August 17, 2023 ~

John Eastman and Rudy Giuliani

John Eastman and Rudy Giuliani on the Stage at the Trump Rally on January 6, 2021

American democracy is in a slow death gurgle from the repetition of Orwellian reverse-speak slogans: “Make America Great Again,” “Save America,” “Drain the Swamp,” and “America’s Mayor.”

Most Americans have forgotten that Rudy Giuliani was under serious consideration to be nominated by Donald Trump as his Attorney General. As “America’s Mayor,” Giuliani would have likely sailed through his Senate confirmation.

Allowing public relations and branding agents to create the brand of “America’s Mayor” as the country reeled in shock after 9/11, launched the power-hungry Giuliani that today is facing a 13-count indictment that includes charges of racketeering and conspiracy.

The new media buzz is how did America’s Mayor get caught up in this mess. The hard truth is that Giuliani was always a wannabe authoritarian dressed up by handlers as an American hero.

During Giuliani’s two terms as Mayor of New York City, from 1993 through 2001, he was sued 30 times by the New York Civil Liberties Union (NYCLU), the state affiliate of the ACLU. Of those 30 lawsuits, the NYCLU won 27 of the cases.

I was one of those cases.

In the spring of 2001, a small group of protestors, including myself, paced peacefully up and down the sidewalk outside of Carnegie Hall in Manhattan, carrying signs protesting the serial corruption by Wall Street behemoth, Citigroup, which had grabbed a taxpayer-funded building that day for its annual shareholders’ meeting. For reasons that are still unclear, only I was snatched from the sidewalk by police and placed in a jail cell with the threat of being held for three days, instead of the customary practice of being given a desk appearance ticket and released. (After I hired an attorney, I was held for just that day.)

As the time of my arrest, Giuliani’s Police Commissioner was Bernie Kerik. He was subsequently sentenced to a prison term in 2010 for corruption and is now reported to be an unindicted co-conspirator in the state of Georgia indictment against Trump and 18 others.

During the course of the case that the NYCLU brought on my behalf, we learned through an internal police memorandum that the Giuliani administration had instituted a policy of jailing protesters if they appeared in a group of 20 or more, an egregious assault on the Bill of Rights guarantee of freedom to assemble.

The city settled my case with a small monetary sum and the agreement to stop arresting peaceful protestors. Giuliani’s NYPD had previously even outlawed protests on the steps of City Hall, a traditional venue for protests in New York City, leading City Council Members to charge Giuliani with functioning like a dictator.

Removing peaceful protesters from the sidewalks in front of taxpayer-supported public buildings in New York City and herding people like cattle into metal pens on the sidewalk in less visible areas became a standard practice during the Giuliani administration. In its 60th Anniversary Annual Report, the NYCLU characterized Giuliani’s reign as Mayor as follows:

“Defending civil rights is always a priority for the NYCLU, but some eras—and elected officials—demand greater vigilance. Over the eight-year term of Mayor Rudolph Giuliani…NYCLU, under the leadership of Executive Director Norman Siegel, filed more than 30 lawsuits and amicus briefs directed at Giuliani administration policies and practices. We won over 90 percent of them.

“Many focused on Giuliani’s disregard for the First Amendment as he sought to silence his critics. The NYCLU successfully challenged the Giuliani administration for NYPD retaliation against black and Latino police officers who spoke out about racial profiling, and opposed gag rules that tried to ban city employees from speaking with the press on their own time. The NYCLU successfully challenged Giuliani administration efforts in 1998 to limit protest on the steps of City Hall.

“When the mayor tried to censor a bus ad that satirized him, courts agreed with the NYCLU and rejected his attempt at censorship as unconstitutional. The NYCLU also vindicated the First Amendment rights of city cab drivers when the Giuliani administration ordered a blockade of East River crossings in a failed effort to stop them from conducting a taxicab caravan protest across the bridges.

“And in 2001, we defended the right of housing advocates to protest by sleeping on the sidewalk across the street from Gracie Mansion—and we defended the right of a church to allow homeless people to sleep on its own church steps. That same year, an NYCLU lawsuit forced the NYPD to abandon its policy of arresting and holding protesters overnight, for next-day arraignments, in favor of issuing them desk appearance tickets…

“Throughout the Giuliani administration, the NYCLU kept close watch on the NYPD and its oversight body, the Civilian Complaint Review Board, publishing seven separate reports that criticized the agency for failing to provide meaningful oversight of the police. The NYCLU’s 1998 report Deflecting Blame critiqued Giuliani administration failures to reform police practices in the wake of several notorious cases of police brutality—the brutal torture of Abner Louima and the killing of Anthony Baez, Michael Stewart, Amadou Diallo and far too many others.”

Also unknown to most Americans, Giuliani was a law partner at Greenberg, Traurig from 2016 to 2018, at which time he stepped down and joined the Trump legal defense team. Greenberg, Traurig had a long-tenured relationship as a lobbyist for the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, which has sought to restrict the rights of average citizens to hold corporations accountable through class action lawsuits.

The Chamber was also an active player in the 2010 Citizens United decision from the U.S. Supreme Court. That decision has allowed corporations to spend unlimited sums on elections while giving groups like the Chamber the ability to use massive contributions from anonymous donors to preordain the outcome of elections. As a 501(c) entity, the Chamber does not have to disclose the sources of its funding while it simultaneously engages in dark money electioneering.

Greenberg Traurig is also a major player in contributions to federal political campaigns, with donations of $17.19 million since 1990 according to OpenSecrets.org.

In 2006, Public Citizen, a nonprofit watchdog, filed a complaint with the IRS against the Chamber, charging that it and “its affiliated Institute for Legal Reform (ILR) failed to report millions in taxable spending from 2000 to 2004 intended to influence state-level attorney general and state supreme court races and federal races around the country.”

On the day the complaint was filed, Public Citizen’s President, Joan Claybrook, stated: “The Chamber is playing an elaborate shell game to conceal its gambit to stack the courts with hand-picked pro-corporate judges. The IRS should promptly investigate its dubious tax reports and address any abuses that it finds.”

According to the complaint, in 2000 the Chamber claimed it had succeeded in winning 15 out of 17 state supreme court races after spending $6 million. In 2002, it announced that it would spend $40 million on political races in Congress and state-level races for attorney general. According to Public Citizen’s complaint, the Chamber failed to report this activity on its tax returns from 2000 to 2003.

Increasingly, we hear concerns being raised by leaders, both here and abroad, that democracy is slipping away from the American people. My epiphany of that sad reality came at the hands of the Giuliani administration 22 years ago on a beautiful spring day on a sidewalk in New York.


LINK

Sunday, August 13, 2023

FOCUS: Georgia Prosecutors Have Messages Showing Trump’s Team is Behind Voting System Breach

 

 

Reader Supported News
13 August 23

Live on the homepage now!
Reader Supported News

THE BARE MINIMUM — What the heck is all this fundraising about? Meeting RSN’s basic operating costs. This is what it takes in 2023 to raise enough funding to keep the lights on. Hard but necessary.
Marc Ash • Founder, Reader Supported News

Sure, I'll make a donation!

 

Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis. (Photo: AP)
FOCUS: Georgia Prosecutors Have Messages Showing Trump’s Team is Behind Voting System Breach
Zachary Cohen and Sara Murray, CNN
Excerpt: "Atlanta-area prosecutors investigating efforts to overturn the 2020 election results in Georgia are in possession of text messages and emails directly connecting members of Donald Trump’s legal team to the early January 2021 voting system breach in Coffee County, sources tell CNN." 

Atlanta-area prosecutors investigating efforts to overturn the 2020 election results in Georgia are in possession of text messages and emails directly connecting members of Donald Trump’s legal team to the early January 2021 voting system breach in Coffee County, sources tell CNN.

Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis is expected to seek charges against more than a dozen individuals when her team presents its case before a grand jury next week. Several individuals involved in the voting systems breach in Coffee County are among those who may face charges in the sprawling criminal probe.

Investigators in the Georgia criminal probe have long suspected the breach was not an organic effort sprung from sympathetic Trump supporters in rural and heavily Republican Coffee County – a county Trump won by nearly 70% of the vote. They have gathered evidence indicating it was a top-down push by Trump’s team to access sensitive voting software, according to people familiar with the situation.

Trump allies attempted to access voting systems after the 2020 election as part of the broader push to produce evidence that could back up the former president’s baseless claims of widespread fraud.

While Trump’s January 2021 call to Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger and effort to put forward fake slates of electors have long been considered key pillars of Willis’ criminal probe, the voting system breach in Coffee County quietly emerged as an area of focus for investigators roughly one year ago. Since then, new evidence has slowly been uncovered about the role of Trump’s attorneys, the operatives they hired and how the breach, as well as others like it in other key states, factored into broader plans for overturning the election.

Together, the text messages and other court documents show how Trump lawyers and a group of hired operatives sought to access Coffee County’s voting systems in the days before January 6, 2021, as the former president’s allies continued a desperate hunt for any evidence of widespread fraud they could use to delay certification of Joe Biden’s electoral victory.

 Last year, a former Trump official testified under oath to the House January 6 select committee that plans to access voting systems in Georgia were discussed in meetings at the White House, including during an Oval Office meeting on December 18, 2020,  that included Trump. 

Six days before pro-Trump operatives gained unauthorized access to voting systems, the local elections official who allegedly helped facilitate the breach sent a “written invitation” to attorneys working for Trump, according to text messages obtained by CNN.

Investigators have scrutinized the actions of various individuals who were involved, including Misty Hampton, a former Coffee County elections official who authored the letter of invitation referenced in text messages and other documents that have been turned over to prosecutors, multiple sources told CNN.

They have also examined the involvement of Trump’s then attorney Rudy Giuliani – who was informed last year he was a target in the Fulton County investigation – and fellow Trump lawyer Sidney Powell as part of their probe, according to people familiar with the matter.

A spokesperson for Willis’ office declined to comment.

The letter of invitation was shared with attorneys and an investigator working with Giuliani at the time, the text messages obtained by CNN show.

A ‘written invitation’ to access voting systems

On January 1, 2021 – days ahead of the January 7 voting systems breach – Katherine Friess – an attorney working with Giuliani, Sidney Powell and other Trump allies shared a “written invitation” to examine voting systems in Coffee County with a group of Trump allies.

That group included members of Sullivan Strickler, a firm hired by Trump’s attorneys to examine voting systems in the small, heavily Republican Georgia county, according to text messages obtained by CNN.

That same day, Friess sent a “Letter of invitation to Coffee County, Georgia” to former NYPD Police Commissioner Bernie Kerik, who was working with Giuliani to find evidence that would back up their baseless claims of potential widespread voter fraud, according to court documents filed as part of an ongoing civil case.

Friess then notified operatives who carried out the Coffee County breach and others working directly with Giuliani that Trump’s team had secured written permission, the texts show.

CNN has not reviewed the substance of the invitation letter itself, only communications that confirm it was provided to Friess, Kerik and Sullivan Strickler employees.

Friess could not be reached for comment.

The messages and documents appear to link Giuliani to the Coffee County breach, while shedding light on another channel of communication between pro-Trump attorneys and the battleground state operatives who worked together to provide unauthorized individuals access to sensitive voting equipment.

“Rudy Giuliani had nothing to do with this,” said Robert Costello, Giuliani’s attorney. “You can’t attach Rudy Giuliani to Sidney Powell’s crackpot idea.”

“Just landed back in DC with the Mayor huge things starting to come together!” an employee from the firm Sullivan Strickler, which was hired by Sidney Powell to examine voting systems in Coffee County, wrote in a group chat with other colleagues on January 1.

Former New York Mayor Giuliani was consistently referred to as “the Mayor,” in other texts sent by the same individual and others at the time.

“Most immediately, we were just granted access – by written invitation! – to Coffee County’s systems. Yay!” the text reads.

Breaking into Coffee County

Shortly after Election Day, Hampton – still serving as the top election official for Coffee County – warned during a state election board meeting that Dominion voting machines could “very easily” be manipulated to flip votes from one candidate to another. It’s a claim that has been repeatedly debunked.

But the Trump campaign officials took notice and reached out to Hampton that same day. “I would like to obtain as much information as possible,” a Trump campaign staffer emailed Hampton at the time, according to documents released as part of a public records request and first reported by the Washington Post.

In early December, Hampton then delayed certification of Joe Biden’s win in Georgia by refusing to validate the recount results by a key deadline. Coffee County was the only county in Georgia that failed to certify its election results due to issues raised by Hampton at the time.

Hampton also posted a video online claiming to expose problems with the county’s Dominion voting system. That video was used by Trump’s lawyers, including Giuliani, as part of their push to convince legislators from multiple states that there was evidence the 2020 election results were tainted by voting system issues.

Text messages and other documents obtained by CNN show Trump allies were seeking access to Coffee County’s voting system by mid-December amid increasing demands for proof of widespread election fraud.

Coffee County was specifically cited in draft executive orders for seizing voting machines that were presented to Trump on December 18, 2020, during a chaotic Oval Office meeting, CNN has reported. During that same meeting, Giuliani alluded to a plan to gain “voluntary access” to machines in Georgia, according to testimony from him and others before the House January 6 committee.

Days later, Hampton shared the written invitation to access the county’s election office with a Trump lawyer, text messages obtained by CNN show. She and another location elections official, Cathy Latham, allegedly helped Trump operatives gain access to the county’s voting systems, according to documents, testimony and surveillance video produced as part of a long-running civil lawsuit focused on election security in Georgia.

Latham, who also served as a fake elector from Georgia after the 2020 election, has come under scrutiny for her role in the Coffee County breach after surveillance video showed she allowed unauthorized outsiders to spend hours examining voting systems there.



READ MORE

 

Contribute to RSN

Follow us on facebook and twitter!

Update My Monthly Donation

PO Box 2043 / Citrus Heights, CA 95611






Saturday, June 17, 2023

Disgraced former NYPD chief Kerik sought millions for election subversion scheme

 


Alex Wagner reports on new revelations that disgraced former NYPD commissioner Bernard Kerik pitched then-chief of staff to Donald Trump, Mark Meadows on an idea to subvert Trump's 2020 election loss and asked for millions of dollars to execute the plan.




Tuesday, July 12, 2022

“Team Crazy” and Co-Conspirators that Marshaled the Mob at the Capitol to be Key Focus of Tuesday’s January 6 Hearing

 

SUBSCRIBE TO THIS NEWSLETTER


“Team Crazy” and Co-Conspirators that Marshaled the Mob at the Capitol to be Key Focus of Tuesday’s January 6 Hearing

By Pam Martens and Russ Martens: July 11, 2022 ~

Team Crazy

(Left to Right): Rudy Giuliani, Michael Flynn, Sidney Powell

Two members of the January 6 House Select Committee who will do the questioning of witnesses at this coming Tuesday’s hearing appeared on two of the key Sunday news programs. House Rep Jamie Raskin (D-MD) made an appearance on the CBS program, Face the Nation, while House Rep Stephanie Murphy (D-FL) gave an interview to Chuck Todd on the NBC program, Meet the Press.

Raskin revealed that the infamous December 18 meeting at the White House will be explored at Tuesday’s hearing. Highlights of that meeting have been covered in numerous books and articles but now the Committee plans to offer first-hand testimony (potentially from filmed depositions) about the illegal proposals that were discussed with President Donald Trump at that meeting.

Trump’s outside lawyers at that meeting, who were referred to by White House lawyers as “Team Crazy,” included Sidney Powell and Rudy Giuliani. The meeting started out in the Oval Office with Trump, Powell, former national security advisor Michael Flynn, former Overstock.com CEO, Patrick Bryne, and former Trump administration official, Emily Newman. Giuliani was reached by phone at a local restaurant and joined the group.

According to the various book and media reports on the December 18 meeting, ideas to stop the transfer of the Presidency to Joe Biden ranged from seizing Dominion voting machines, which Powell was alleging had been rigged, to the appointment of Powell as a Special Counsel to investigate election fraud, to the President declaring something akin to martial law using the National Emergencies Act and an executive order.

Fortunately for the country, White House lawyers were present at this meeting, which started shortly after 7 p.m. in the Oval Office and later moved to the living room of the President’s residence in the White House, lasting until around midnight.

Pushing back on the plans from “Team Crazy,” were White House Counsel Pat Cipollone, whom the Committee deposed this past Friday; and Eric Herschmann, a former Assistant District Attorney in the Manhattan DA’s office who went on to work for Kasowitz Benson & Torres, the law firm that represented Trump during Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation. In August of 2020, Herschmann accepted a post as advisor to the President.

If past reporting is any gauge, Herschmann’s f-bomb laced retorts to Team Crazy during the December 18 meeting are likely to get an airing on Tuesday. Raskin also appeared to suggest that new videotaped testimony from Cipollone about this meeting may be aired at Tuesday’s hearing.

The Vice Chair of the House Select Committee, Liz Cheney, had remarked about this December 18 meeting during her opening remarks at the first public hearing on June 9. Cheney stated that just a little more than an hour after this meeting had broken up, Trump sent out a Tweet encouraging people to come to Washington on January 6: “Big protest in D.C. on January 6th,” Trump wrote. “Be there, will be wild!”

Cheney also stated this in her remarks.

“As you will see, this was a pivotal moment. This tweet initiated a chain of events. The tweet led to the planning for what occurred on January 6th, including by the Proud Boys who ultimately led the invasion of the Capitol and the violence that day…

“Although certain former Trump officials have argued that they did not anticipate violence on January 6th, the evidence suggests otherwise. As you will see in our hearings, the White House was receiving specific reports in the days leading up to January 6th, including during President Trump’s Ellipse rally, indicating that elements in the crowd were preparing for violence at the Capitol.

“And, on the evening of January 5th, the President’s close advisor Steve Bannon said this on his podcast: ‘All hell is going to break loose tomorrow. Just understand this, all hell is going to break loose tomorrow.’

“As part of our investigation, we will present information about what the White House and other intelligence agencies knew, and why the Capitol was not better prepared. But we will not lose sight of the fact that the Capitol Police did not cause the crowd to attack. And we will not blame the violence that day, violence provoked by Donald Trump, on the officers who bravely defended all of you.

“In our final hearing, you will hear a moment-by-moment account of the hours-long attack from more than a half dozen White House staff, both live in the hearing room and via videotaped testimony. There is no doubt that President Trump was well aware of the violence as it developed.

“White House staff urged President Trump to intervene and call off the mob…

“This is exactly what his supporters on Capitol Hill and nationwide were urging the President to do. He would not. You will hear that leaders on Capitol Hill begged the President for help, including Republican Leader McCarthy, who was ‘scared’ and called multiple members of President Trump’s family after he could not persuade the President himself.

“Not only did President Trump refuse to tell the mob to leave the Capitol, he placed no call to any element of the U.S. government to instruct that the Capitol be defended. He did not call his Secretary of Defense on January 6th. He did not talk to his Attorney General. He did not talk to the Department of Homeland Security.

“President Trump gave no order to deploy the National Guard that day, and he made no effort to work with the Department of Justice to coordinate and deploy law enforcement assets. But Vice President Pence did each of those things….”

Another pivotal meeting that may see some daylight at Tuesday’s hearing is the meeting that was held on the evening of January 5 at the luxurious Willard Hotel, located about a block from the White House. (Single rooms there can run from $300 per night to more than $600 with suites running from $900 per night and up.)

According to previous reporting, suites of rooms at the Willard Hotel were serving as a “War Room,” or “Command Center,” for those planning the January 6 event at the Capitol. Working in the “War Room” were Giuliani; Bannon; former New York City Police Commissioner in the Giuliani administration, Bernie Kerik, (who ended up serving time in prison for tax fraud and received a presidential pardon from Trump); and John Eastman, the former professor and Dean at the Chapman University School of Law, who attempted to persuade former Vice President Mike Pence that he had the authority to reject various states’ slates of electors on January 6, thus denying Biden the Presidency. Eastman was one of the speakers peddling voter fraud at the rally on the Ellipse on January 6.

According to reporting at the Washington Post, the Trump campaign eventually made payments of “more than $225,000 to firms owned by Kerik and Giuliani – including more than $50,000 for rooms and suites at the posh Willard hotel in Washington….”

During the June 28 House Select Committee hearing, Cassidy Hutchinson, the principal aide to White House Chief of Staff, Mark Meadows, testified that Meadows had originally planned to attend the strategy session at the Willard on the evening of January 5, but decided to dial in to the meeting instead.

Another area that the Committee is expected to explore on Tuesday are the paramilitary groups that turned out on January 6. According to a report at NBC on Sunday, one of the witnesses expected to appear live at the Tuesday hearing is Jason Van Tatenhove, a former spokesperson for the Oath Keepers, “who hasn’t been actively involved with the Oath Keepers since about 2017.” Van Tatenhove, according to NBC, “is expected to speak about the far-right militia’s propaganda efforts and radicalization.”

In a podcast that Van Tatenhove released on June 7, he indicates that he expected his live testimony to occur at a June 21 House Select hearing. In that podcast, he also mentions that Elmer Stewart Rhodes, the founder and leader of the Oath Keepers, lived in his basement for eight months.

The U.S. Department of Justice released an indictment against Rhodes and other members of the Oath Keepers on January 13. It read in part:

“The seditious conspiracy indictment alleges that, following the Nov. 3, 2020, presidential election, Rhodes conspired with his co-defendants and others to oppose by force the execution of the laws governing the transfer of presidential power by Jan. 20, 2021. Beginning in late December 2020, via encrypted and private communications applications, Rhodes and various co-conspirators coordinated and planned to travel to Washington, D.C., on or around Jan. 6, 2021, the date of the certification of the electoral college vote, the indictment alleges. Rhodes and several co-conspirators made plans to bring weapons to the area to support the operation. The co-conspirators then traveled across the country to the Washington, D.C., metropolitan area in early January 2021.

“According to the seditious conspiracy indictment, the defendants conspired through a variety of manners and means, including: organizing into teams that were prepared and willing to use force and to transport firearms and ammunition into Washington, D.C.; recruiting members and affiliates to participate in the conspiracy; organizing trainings to teach and learn paramilitary combat tactics; bringing and contributing paramilitary gear, weapons and supplies – including knives, batons, camouflaged combat uniforms, tactical vests with plates, helmets, eye protection and radio equipment – to the Capitol grounds; breaching and attempting to take control of the Capitol grounds and building on Jan. 6, 2021, in an effort to prevent, hinder and delay the certification of the electoral college vote; using force against law enforcement officers while inside the Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021; continuing to plot, after Jan. 6, 2021, to oppose by force the lawful transfer of presidential power, and using websites, social media, text messaging and encrypted messaging applications to communicate with co-conspirators and others.”

In court papers the Justice Department filed this past Friday, it is charging that grenades and other weapons were brought by members of the Oath Keepers to the Washington D.C. area ahead of the January 6 insurrection at the Capitol.

LINK




Top News | 'Totally Crazy': Trump Holds Housing Bill Hostage to Eviscerate Voting Rights

                 LOTS OF POSTS IGNORED BY BLOGGER..... OR REMOVED ON THEIR WHIM! ALL POSTS ARE AVAILABLE ON MIDDLEBORO REVIEW AND SO ON BLOG...