Thursday, September 3, 2020

Trump: Americans Who Died in War Are ‘Losers’ and ‘Suckers’






Image may contain: 1 person, text


Trump: Americans Who Died in War Are ‘Losers’ and ‘Suckers’





When President Donald Trump canceled a visit to the Aisne-Marne American Cemetery near Paris in 2018, he blamed rain for the last-minute decision, saying that “the helicopter couldn’t fly” and that the Secret Service wouldn’t drive him there. Neither claim was true.

Trump rejected the idea of the visit because he feared his hair would become disheveled in the rain, and because he did not believe it important to honor American war dead, according to four people with firsthand knowledge of the discussion that day. In a conversation with senior staff members on the morning of the scheduled visit, Trump said, “Why should I go to that cemetery? It’s filled with losers.” In a separate conversation on the same trip, Trump referred to the more than 1,800 marines who lost their lives at Belleau Wood as “suckers” for getting killed.

Belleau Wood is a consequential battle in American history, and the ground on which it was fought is venerated by the Marine Corps. America and its allies stopped the German advance toward Paris there in the spring of 1918. But Trump, on that same trip, asked aides, “Who were the good guys in this war?” He also said that he didn’t understand why the United States would intervene on the side of the Allies.

Trump’s understanding of concepts such as patriotism, service, and sacrifice has interested me since he expressed contempt for the war record of the late Senator John McCain, who spent more than five years as a prisoner of the North Vietnamese. “He’s not a war hero,” Trump said in 2015 while running for the Republican nomination for president. “I like people who weren’t captured.”

There was no precedent in American politics for the expression of this sort of contempt, but the performatively patriotic Trump did no damage to his candidacy by attacking McCain in this manner. Nor did he set his campaign back by attacking the parents of Humayun Khan, an Army captain who was killed in Iraq in 2004.

Trump remained fixated on McCain, one of the few prominent Republicans to continue criticizing him after he won the nomination. When McCain died, in August 2018, Trump told his senior staff, according to three sources with direct knowledge of this event, “We’re not going to support that loser’s funeral,” and he became furious, according to witnesses, when he saw flags lowered to half-staff. “What the fuck are we doing that for? Guy was a fucking loser,” the president told aides. Trump was not invited to McCain’s funeral. (These sources, and others quoted in this article, spoke on condition of anonymity. The White House did not return earlier calls for comment, but Alyssa Farah, a White House spokesperson, emailed me this statement shortly after this story was posted: “This report is false. President Trump holds the military in the highest regard. He’s demonstrated his commitment to them at every turn: delivering on his promise to give our troops a much needed pay raise, increasing military spending, signing critical veterans reforms, and supporting military spouses. This has no basis in fact.”)

Trump’s understanding of heroism has not evolved since he became president. According to sources with knowledge of the president’s views, he seems to genuinely not understand why Americans treat former prisoners of war with respect. Nor does he understand why pilots who are shot down in combat are honored by the military. On at least two occasions since becoming president, according to three sources with direct knowledge of his views, Trump referred to former President George H. W. Bush as a “loser” for being shot down by the Japanese as a Navy pilot in World War II. (Bush escaped capture, but eight other men shot down during the same mission were caught, tortured, and executed by Japanese soldiers.)

When lashing out at critics, Trump often reaches for illogical and corrosive insults, and members of the Bush family have publicly opposed him. But his cynicism about service and heroism extends even to the World War I dead buried outside Paris—people who were killed more than a quarter century before he was born. Trump finds the notion of military service difficult to understand, and the idea of volunteering to serve especially incomprehensible. (The president did not serve in the military; he received a medical deferment from the draft during the Vietnam War because of the alleged presence of bone spurs in his feet. In the 1990s, Trump said his efforts to avoid contracting sexually transmitted diseases constituted his “personal Vietnam.”)


On Memorial Day 2017, Trump visited Arlington National Cemetery, a short drive from the White House. He was accompanied on this visit by John Kelly, who was then the secretary of homeland security, and who would, a short time later, be named the White House chief of staff. The two men were set to visit Section 60, the 14-acre area of the cemetery that is the burial ground for those killed in America’s most recent wars. Kelly’s son Robert is buried in Section 60. A first lieutenant in the Marine Corps, Robert Kelly was killed in 2010 in Afghanistan. He was 29. Trump was meant, on this visit, to join John Kelly in paying respects at his son’s grave, and to comfort the families of other fallen service members. But according to sources with knowledge of this visit, Trump, while standing by Robert Kelly’s grave, turned directly to his father and said, “I don’t get it. What was in it for them?” Kelly (who declined to comment for this story) initially believed, people close to him said, that Trump was making a ham-handed reference to the selflessness of America’s all-volunteer force. But later he came to realize that Trump simply does not understand non-transactional life choices.

“He can’t fathom the idea of doing something for someone other than himself,” one of Kelly’s friends, a retired four-star general, told me. “He just thinks that anyone who does anything when there’s no direct personal gain to be had is a sucker. There’s no money in serving the nation.” Kelly’s friend went on to say, “Trump can’t imagine anyone else’s pain. That’s why he would say this to the father of a fallen marine on Memorial Day in the cemetery where he’s buried.”

I’ve asked numerous general officers over the past year for their analysis of Trump’s seeming contempt for military service. They offer a number of explanations. Some of his cynicism is rooted in frustration, they say. Trump, unlike previous presidents, tends to believe that the military, like other departments of the federal government, is beholden only to him, and not the Constitution. Many senior officers have expressed worry about Trump’s understanding of the rules governing the use of the armed forces. This issue came to a head in early June, during demonstrations in Washington, D.C., in response to police killings of Black people. James Mattis, the retired Marine general and former secretary of defense, lambasted Trump at the time for ordering law-enforcement officers to forcibly clear protesters from Lafayette Square, and for using soldiers as props: “When I joined the military, some 50 years ago, I swore an oath to support and defend the Constitution,” Mattis wrote. “Never did I dream that troops taking that same oath would be ordered under any circumstance to violate the Constitutional rights of their fellow citizens—much less to provide a bizarre photo op for the elected commander-in-chief, with military leadership standing alongside.”


Another explanation is more quotidian, and aligns with a broader understanding of Trump’s material-focused worldview. The president believes that nothing is worth doing without the promise of monetary payback, and that talented people who don’t pursue riches are “losers.” (According to eyewitnesses, after a White House briefing given by the then-chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, General Joe Dunford, Trump turned to aides and said, “That guy is smart. Why did he join the military?”)

Yet another, related, explanation concerns what appears to be Trump’s pathological fear of appearing to look like a “sucker” himself. His capacious definition of sucker includes those who lose their lives in service to their country, as well as those who are taken prisoner, or are wounded in battle. “He has a lot of fear,” one officer with firsthand knowledge of Trump’s views said. “He doesn’t see the heroism in fighting.” Several observers told me that Trump is deeply anxious about dying or being disfigured, and this worry manifests itself as disgust for those who have suffered. Trump recently claimed that he has received the bodies of slain service members “many, many” times, but in fact he has traveled to Dover Air Force Base, the transfer point for the remains of fallen service members, only four times since becoming president. In another incident, Trump falsely claimed that he had called “virtually all” of the families of service members who had died during his term, then began rush-shipping condolence letters when families said the president was not telling the truth.

Trump has been, for the duration of his presidency, fixated on staging military parades, but only of a certain sort. In a 2018 White House planning meeting for such an event, Trump asked his staff not to include wounded veterans, on grounds that spectators would feel uncomfortable in the presence of amputees. “Nobody wants to see that,” he said.


LINK




Trump flies to Kenosha but lands on Planet Zog

 

Washington Post columnist Dana Milbank: Trump heads for Kenosha lands on Planet Zog -- who would ever have believed this world before it happened to us? Tom
"President Trump took off on Air Force One on Tuesday morning on his way to Kenosha, Wis. He landed on Planet Zog.
"In real life, protests (some peaceful, some violent) erupted after police shot Jacob Blake, a Black man, seven times in the back. A Trump-supporting militia member allegedly gunned down three of the protesters, killing two of them. But in the imaginary Kenosha that Trump created Tuesday afternoon at an invitation-only “roundtable” — in a high school cafeteria serving as a government “command center” — things were quite different.
"There was no pandemic in this Kenosha; at his suggestion, everybody in the roundtable took off their face masks. There was no right-wing violence. (I heard no mention of the killings by the Trump-backing extremist.) There was no such thing as police brutality (Trump quickly swept aside any such notion). And there were hardly any Black people (only two of the 23 in the room).
"It quickly became clear that the pair, a pastor and his wife, were to be seen rather than heard. James Ward, who said he is the pastor to Blake’s mother, was asked by Trump to offer a prayer, then offered to discuss “the real pain that hurts Black Americans.” Trump wasn’t interested. When Trump opened the roundtable to questions, a reporter asked the pastor whether he believed that there is systemic racism in law enforcement.
"Before Ward could answer, Trump broke in to say there were only “some bad apples” among police, of which “I have the endorsement of so many, maybe everybody.” The reporter tried again. “Could the pastor answer my question, please?”
"Trump called on another questioner. Then, shutting down the session, Trump turned to the muted pastor he had just used as a prop. “Fantastic job,” he said.
"As the election gets closer and closer, Trump appears to be getting further and further from reality. Tuesday’s stagecraft in Kenosha was Trump’s most audacious attempt to rearrange reality since … well, since the night before. On Monday, he informed Fox News’s Laura Ingraham that Joe Biden is the victim of mind control by “people that you’ve never heard of, people that are in the dark shadows.” They are, he said, the same “people that are controlling the streets.” Trump further reported the existence of a plane, “almost completely loaded with thugs wearing these dark uniforms, black uniforms.” He said they “were on the plane to do big damage.”
"Pressed for details, Trump said he could divulge no more. “I’ll tell you sometime, but it’s under investigation.” As NBC reported, Trump’s fantastical tale closely matched a two-month-old conspiracy theory making the rounds on Facebook.
"By the time he arrived at Joint Base Andrews for his trip to Wisconsin, Trump had already developed more details about his new conspiracy theory. This time, “the entire plane filled up with the looters, the anarchists, the rioters.” And Trump said he has a firsthand account from a person on the plane. “Maybe they’ll speak to you and maybe they won’t,” he said. (They didn’t.)
"Arriving in Kenosha, Trump toured a camera shop that had been damaged. There, he chose to speak about Portland, Ore. — about 2,000 miles away. Portland “has been terrible for a long time, for many decades, actually.” Portland is frequently ranked among the “most livable cities” in America.
"Trump didn’t meet with the Blake family, instead moving on to the high school cafeteria, draped with blue curtains and decorated with flags.
“I feel so safe,” Trump remarked, after a tour in which he was protected by armored personnel carriers, military trucks and police in camouflage carrying automatic rifles.
"He received thanks from a participant for “sending the National Guard.” (That was actually the work of Democratic Gov. Tony Evers, who, like Kenosha’s mayor, urged Trump not to visit.)
"Trump reported that “there was love on the street, I can tell you, of Wisconsin when we were coming in … so many African Americans.” According to the “pool” reporters traveling in the president’s motorcade, he had been greeted by friends and foes alike, including one “large group protesting the president, their middle fingers pointed at motorcade.”
"The two African Americans in the roundtable did their best to bring Trump around to reality. James Ward prayed for a restoration of “empathy and compassion.” Sharon Ward noted that “it’s important to have Black people at the table” and called it “a good opportunity for us really to solve the problem.”
"But Trump would not be moved. Asked about nonviolent protests and structural racism, he answered with “anarchists,” “looters,” “rioters” and “agitators.” He said Democrats like riots and want to close prisons and end immigration enforcement. “The wall will be finished very shortly,” he added.




Image may contain: 1 person, text that says 'Tim Wise @timjacobwise Imagine a CEO of a failing company telling investors that if you replace him the company will fail. Or a football coach whose team keeps losing telling the GM that disaster will befall them if they get someone new. Now, listen to the president and tell me the difference'




Image may contain: 2 people, meme and suit, text that says 'COMPLAINS ABOUT VOTER FRAUD FOR FOUR YEARS TELLS SUPPORTERS TO COMMIT VOTER FRAUD'




Image may contain: 1 person, meme, text that says 'WE NEVER HAD TO WORRY ABOUT A CORRUPTED ELECTION. EMS UNTIL WE HAD A CORRUPT PRESIDENT.'


Image may contain: text that says 'Gentle Reminder: Joe Biden has been endorsed by 81 Nobel Prize Recipients. trump has been endorsed by the My Pillow Guy.'




Millions of dollars from super PACs

 

Squad Victory Fund


Ayanna won her primary election on Tuesday, and now all four original members of the Squad are officially moving on to November’s general election.

Republicans and super PACs spent millions of dollars in the past several months in a failed attempt to derail our movement and defeat Ilhan, AOC, Ayanna, and Rashida. But the people made their voices heard and voted for the progressive change our communities need, with four strong primary wins.

But here’s the thing: Republicans are going to keep ramping up their attacks against AOC, Ilhan, Rashida, and Ayanna to try to defeat them on November 3rd.

Alexandria, Ilhan, Rashida, and Ayanna have been in Congress for just two years, but they’ve already made real progress on so many important issues — while also holding the occupant of the White House accountable for his cruel and bigoted policies.

With your support, we are building a movement to take on Republicans and special interests who are fighting to maintain an unjust status quo. A brighter future is possible — with racial, social, economic, and environmental justice for all — but we’re going to have to organize, advocate, and legislate for it.

Thank you for your support,

The Squad Victory Fund

Paid for by The Squad Victory Fund, a joint fundraising committee authorized by Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez for Congress, Ilhan for Congress, The Committee to Elect Ayanna Pressley, Rashida Tlaib for Congress, Courage to Change, Inspiring Leadership Has a Name PAC, Power of Us PAC, and Rooted in Community Leadership PAC.

In addition to what’s legally required, The Squad Victory Fund does not accept contributions from: (1) corporations, associations, or their PACs; (2) individuals registered as federal lobbyists or under FARA; (3) from the PACs, lobbyists, or SEC-named executives of fossil fuel companies; or (4) from the Fraternal Order of Police.

Contributions or gifts to The Squad Victory Fund are not tax deductible.

Contributions to The Squad Victory Fund will be allocated as follows: 12.5% to each of Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez for Congress, Ilhan for Congress, The Committee to Elect Ayanna Pressley, Rashida Tlaib for Congress, Courage to Change, Inspiring Leadership Has a Name PAC, Power of Us PAC, and Rooted in Community Leadership PAC.



This is a long email, but I hope you'll read it

 

Dear MoveOn member,

I'm Amy White, MoveOn's Director of Analytics. I don't write to you often, but in the wake of last week's sickening Republican National Convention, I wanted to reach out to share the details about a program my team is running to put an end to Donald Trump's authoritarianism on November 3.

As the RNC confirmed last week, the GOP strategy to win is to use their billionaire donors to flood battleground states with fearmongering, racist ads and messaging to try to rally their base toward Trump.

We could never match their spending dollar for dollar—but luckily, we don't have to. Because here's the truth: The most effective and impactful campaign strategy is not sending generic, inflammatory messages far and wide, it's actually highly targeted outreach to small groups of voters who are most likely to tip swing states blue.

That's where my team comes in.

We are building models to identify "high-potential voters," with the goal of turning out 100,000 people who would otherwise not vote across the 14 most important battleground states—a goal that, if we're able to achieve it, could clinch the election for Joe Biden and Kamala Harris.

I'll lay out all the details below, but I need to ask you now: Will you chip in $3 a week to help us power this game-changing, all-or-nothing campaign until the very last vote is counted? (MoveOn will bill your weekly donation to your credit card once a month starting today and will contact you shortly after the election to see if you want to modify or cancel your weekly donation.)


You might be asking: What is a "high-potential voter," and how are you going to reach out to them?

Great questions!

We define "high-potential voters" as being voters and potential voters who fit one or more of these criteria:

  • Voters who cast a ballot for Barack Obama in 2012 but did not vote in 2016.
  • Voters who cast a ballot for a third-party candidate in recent elections.
  • Voters who cast ballots in the 2018 midterms but did not vote in 2016.
  • New voters who turned 18 after the 2016 election.
  • Naturalized citizens who have become eligible to vote since 2016.
  • And in all of these categories, we are focused specifically on younger voters and voters of color.

Through extensive research and statistical modeling, we've found a whopping 7 million voters who fit into these categories spread across the 14 most important battleground states.

Donald Trump is president today because of 10,704 votes in Michigan, 46,765 votes in Pennsylvania, and 22,177 votes in Wisconsin.1 That means if we can get just over 1% of those 7 million people to cast ballots for the Biden-Harris ticket, Trump will almost certainly lose this time around.

One percent. That's it.

So how are we reaching out to these voters? Using powerful, personalized messaging tailored to each individual voter.

This week, for example, we're testing 18 different messages about the critical importance of defeating Trump to 850,000 voters across the battleground states to learn which messages are most effective at convincing voters to sign "Vote Tripling" pledges—pledges to vote and to help three of their friends or family to vote too.

My team and I will be able to use the data we gather from this test to target the most powerful messages to millions of individual voters based on their location, age, political leanings, and more.

We used a similar method in 2018 to send persuasive videos to potential voters in important districts and states, and in the end, that program helped to secure tens of thousands of votes for Democrats and, in turn, helped to flip control of the House.

This program is even bigger—and far more important given that a second Trump term is on the line.

But it's expensive. We have to purchase thousands of ads, send millions of text messages, create customized videos, and build statistical models—and then do it over and over again through Election Day.

That's where you come in. Can you chip in $3 a week to help us reach millions of high-potential voters with customized messages that are proven to be effective at turning out voters? (MoveOn will bill your weekly donation to your credit card once a month starting today and will contact you shortly after the election to see if you want to modify or cancel your weekly donation.)


The newest polls since last week's RNC show that the race is tightening between Trump and Biden, and although these polls should serve as a shock to the system and a reminder that we have to push as hard as we can over the next nine weeks, my team and I were prepared for them, and we built this program to be effective in exactly this scenario.2

We always knew that this election would be close, and that—just like in 2016—victory could come down to a few thousand votes spread over just a handful of states.

Our high-potential voter program was specifically designed for a close election. That's what makes it special. We are focused on voters who would otherwise stay home on Election Day but who could be the difference between winning and losing on November 3.

I've run the tests. I've seen the numbers. I know this can work.

So I'm asking you now to take any fear or anger or anxiety you're feeling and help me to turn it into action by chipping in $3 a week to power this game-changing program. Will you chip in? (MoveOn will bill your weekly donation to your credit card once a month starting today and will contact you shortly after the election to see if you want to modify or cancel your weekly donation.)


Thanks for all you do.

–Amy White

Sources:

1. "Donald Trump will be president thanks to 80,000 people in three states," The Washington Post, December 1, 2016
https://act.moveon.org/go/137382?t=8&akid=272944%2E3735812%2EAWLiFF

2. "Trump Pulls Closer to Biden After RNC," Morning Consult, August 29, 2020
https://act.moveon.org/go/143454?t=10&akid=272944%2E3735812%2EAWLiFF

Want to support our work? As Robert Reich says, “No organization in America has a better track record of success in developing cutting-edge strategies to get out the vote and win elections than MoveOn.” But it will take each of us doing our part to defeat Trump and flip the Senate!

Will you chip in $3 a week to help MoveOn combat right-wing lies, make sure every vote is counted, and win this election? (MoveOn will bill your weekly donation to your credit card once a month starting today and will contact you shortly after the election to see if you want to modify or cancel your weekly donation.)


PAID FOR BY MOVEON . ORG POLITICAL ACTION, http://pol.moveon.org/. Not authorized by any candidate or candidate's committee.




RSN: FOCUS: Washington Post Editorial Board | The Director of National Intelligence Is Providing Cover for Putin

 




 

Reader Supported News
03 September 20

It's Live on the HomePage Now:
Reader Supported News


FOCUS: Washington Post Editorial Board | The Director of National Intelligence Is Providing Cover for Putin
Russian president Vladimir Putin. (photo: Mikhail Klimentyev/AP)
Editorial Board, The Washington Post
Excerpt: "After the intelligence community briefed members of Congress in late July about threats to the upcoming election, Democrats expressed alarm about what they had learned - and about the fact that the information had not been shared with the American public."

“The warning lights are flashing red. America’s elections are under attack,” wrote Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.) in a Post op-ed, without disclosing any specifics.

The Democrats’ pressure resulted in the issuance of a carefully worded Aug. 7 statement by William Evanina, the director of the National Counterintelligence and Security Center, saying that Russia was once again seeking to interfere in a presidential election, using “a range of measures” to “undermine former Vice President Biden’s candidacy and the Democratic Party.”

Mr. Blumenthal said that statement “only hints at the threats,” which, he added, “are chilling.” He and other Democrats called for the Office of the Director of National Intelligence to declassify what is known about Russia’s activities so voters can be aware of them. Instead, over the weekend the blind loyalist whom Mr. Trump installed this year as director of national intelligence, former Republican congressman John Ratcliffe, dispatched a letter to Congress announcing his intention to curtail briefings between now and the election.

Mr. Ratcliffe said that “to ensure clarity and consistency,” ODNI would meet its legal obligation to report to Congress “through written finished intelligence products” rather than live briefings, which allow legislators to ask follow-up questions. While he later told Fox News that congressional intelligence committees would still be briefed, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) and Intelligence Committee Chairman Rep. Adam B. Schiff said the ODNI had canceled live briefings it had planned for mid-September.

Mr. Ratcliffe and White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows said the change in policy was a reaction to leaks by members of Congress. But the only “leak” was the simple fact that the administration was withholding critical information about Russia’s interference — which, of course, is intended to help President Trump win reelection.

In effect, Mr. Ratcliffe is providing cover for Vladimir Putin’s influence operation. If Americans are not aware of precisely what Moscow is doing to sow misinformation, they are more likely to be swayed by it. Congress could subpoena Mr. Ratcliffe to publicly testify about the ongoing operation, and it should. But the Trump administration demonstrated during the impeachment proceedings that it will defy subpoenas. Mr. Trump, who has spoken to Mr. Putin frequently by phone this year — including at least three times since May — showed in 2016 that he will do whatever he can to facilitate and exploit Russia’s interference. Some might call that collusion.

READ MORE


Contribute to RSN

Update My Monthly Donation





RSN: Prosecutors' Plea Deal Required Drug Suspect to Name Breonna Taylor a 'Co-Defendant'

 


 

Reader Supported News
03 September 20

It's Live on the HomePage Now:
Reader Supported News


Prosecutors' Plea Deal Required Drug Suspect to Name Breonna Taylor a 'Co-Defendant'
'Breonna Taylor is not a 'co-defendant' in a criminal case. She's dead,' the Taylor family attorney said. 'Way to try and attack a woman when she's not even here to defend herself.' (photo: Amy Harris/AP)
Vanessa Romo, NPR
Romo writes: "A man charged with running a drug syndicate was offered a plea deal in July if he would name Breonna Taylor, the 26-year-old Black woman who had been killed by police in her Louisville, Ky., apartment, as a member of his alleged criminal gang, according to the man's attorney."
READ MORE



San Leandro Police officer charged with shooting death of Steven Taylor. (photo: San Leandro Police)
San Leandro Police officer charged with shooting death of Steven Taylor. (photo: San Leandro Police)


Officer Captured on Video Killing Black Man in Walmart Charged With Manslaughter
Tim Stelloh, NBC News
Stelloh writes: "A California police officer who was captured on video fatally shooting a Black man who had a baseball bat inside a Walmart this year was charged Wednesday with voluntary manslaughter, authorities said."

The office of Alameda County District Attorney Nancy O’Malley said that Steven Taylor, 33, did not pose an imminent threat to anyone in the store or to the officer, Jason Fletcher, when he shot Taylor to death April 18.

“The decision to file the criminal complaint was made after an intensive investigation and thorough analysis of the evidence and the current law,” O'Malley said in a statement.

A security guard at the San Leandro Walmart, southeast of Oakland, called 911 after Taylor tried to leave the store with a baseball bat and a tent without paying, the statement said.

In disturbing cellphone and body-camera video of the encounter, Taylor can be seen standing in the store’s checkout area when Fletcher approaches him and tries unsuccessfully to take the bat.

Taylor backs up several feet, bat in hand, and Fletcher tells him to drop it, which he doesn’t. From a distance of roughly 17 feet, according to the DA's statement, Fletcher drew a stun gun, then fired as Taylor moved toward him.

The prosecutor’s office said Taylor was “clearly” in shock after he was stunned and struggled to remain standing with the bat pointed toward the floor. In the video, customers can be heard shouting “put it down, put it down,” before Fletcher opened fire, striking Taylor in the chest.

In the video, Taylor then tosses the bat to the floor and walks a few feet before collapsing. He was pronounced dead at the scene.

The San Leandro Police Officers Association did not immediately respond to a request for comment, nor did Fletcher’s lawyer, Michael Rains.

Rains told the San Francisco Chronicle that he was “very disappointed” in the charges, which he said were “undeserved.”

“I am very confident that the jury hearing all the evidence in this case will acquit this officer in short order,” he told the newspaper.

A lawyer for Taylor’s family, Lee Merritt, has said that Taylor was struggling with a mental health crisis when Fletcher shot him to death. “It was [an] involuntarily break from reality,” Merritt said. “He needed help. He got brutality.”

In a statement Wednesday, San Leandro Police Chief Jeff Tudor said he knew the “sudden loss” of Taylor had “deeply affected” San Leandro, a city of roughly 90,000. “It is important that we allow the judicial process to take its course,” he said.

The charges were filed under a bill signed into law last year by Gov. Gavin Newsom that limited when officers can use deadly force. Under the previous law, a killing could be considered justified if it was "reasonable" and the person had committed a felony and was fleeing or resisting arrest. The new law states that officers can use deadly force only when necessary to defend human life.

A study published earlier this year by researchers at Harvard found that Black people in the San Francisco Bay Area are five times more likely to die in an encounter with police than whites. The California legislature estimated that between one-third and half of fatal police encounters involve people with mental health issues and intellectual or physical disabilities.

READ MORE



Texas's 38 electoral college votes are seemingly in play this November. (photo: Bob Daemmrich/Shutterstock)
Texas's 38 electoral college votes are seemingly in play this November. (photo: Bob Daemmrich/Shutterstock)


Democrats Push to Register One Million Voters in Attempt to Rip Texas From Trump
Alexandra Villarreal, Guardian UK
Villarreal writes: "As the United States barrels toward the presidential election in November, could Democrats possibly come out on top simply through a massive effort on voter registration? They think they can, and Texas is key."
READ MORE



Amazon facility. (photo: Shutterstock)
Amazon facility. (photo: Shutterstock)


Amazon Is Hiring an Intelligence Analyst to Track 'Labor Organizing Threats'
Lorenzo Franceschi-Bicchierai, VICE
Franceschi-Bicchierai writes: "Amazon is looking to hire two intelligence analysts to track 'labor organizing threats' within the company."
READ MORE



The 3-mile border fence along the shore of the Rio Grande will fail during extreme flooding, according to an engineering report that is set to be filed in federal court this week. (photo: Brenda Bazán/The Texas Tribune)
The 3-mile border fence along the shore of the Rio Grande will fail during extreme flooding, according to an engineering report that is set to be filed in federal court this week. (photo: Brenda Bazán/The Texas Tribune)


New Engineering Report Finds Privately Built Border Wall Will Fail
Jeremy Schwartz and Perla Trevizo, ProPublica
Excerpt: "It's not a matter of if a privately built border fence along the shores of the Rio Grande will fail, it's a matter of when, according to a new engineering report on the troubled project."
READ MORE



International Criminal Court Chief prosecutor Fatou Bensouda, seen here in 2018, has been added to the U.S. Treasury's sanctions list. She is leading the court's investigation into alleged U.S. war crimes in Afghanistan. (photo: Bas Czerwinski/AP)
International Criminal Court Chief prosecutor Fatou Bensouda, seen here in 2018, has been added to the U.S. Treasury's sanctions list. She is leading the court's investigation into alleged U.S. war crimes in Afghanistan. (photo: Bas Czerwinski/AP)


Trump Administration Sanctions ICC Prosecutor Investigating Alleged US War Crimes
UN News
Excerpt: "The UN Secretary-General on Wednesday noted 'with concern' the imposition by the United States of sanctions against the Chief Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court (ICC) and another senior official, in the latest of a series of unilateral policy moves against the body."
READ MORE



Dusk in Hoboken, New Jersey, across the Hudson River from the Empire State Building in Manhattan. (photo: Gary Hershorn/Getty)
Dusk in Hoboken, New Jersey, across the Hudson River from the Empire State Building in Manhattan. (photo: Gary Hershorn/Getty)


'At the Forefront of Climate Change,' Hoboken, New Jersey, Seeks Damages From ExxonMobil
David Hasemyer, Inside Climate News
Hasemyer writes: "The city of Hoboken, New Jersey, filed a lawsuit Wednesday seeking damages from ExxonMobil and other major oil and gas companies for misleading the public about the harmful climate-related impacts such as sea level rise they knew would be caused by burning fossil fuels."

The city joined a long line of state and local litigants alleging Big Oil knew burning fossil fuels caused climate-related problems like sea level rise.

he city of Hoboken, New Jersey, filed a lawsuit Wednesday seeking damages from ExxonMobil and other major oil and gas companies for misleading the public about the harmful climate-related impacts such as sea level rise they knew would be caused by burning fossil fuels. 

The city cast itself as a prime example of an oceanside community "at the forefront of climate change," as Mayor Ravi Bhalla said in announcing the lawsuit.  

Less than five miles from midtown Manhattan in New York City, Hoboken is uniquely vulnerable to sea level rise, according to the lawsuit filed in Hudson County Superior Court. It set forth nuisance, trespass and negligence claims, as well as violations of the New Jersey Consumer Fraud Act.

"As America's fifth-densest city, its residents and infrastructure are integrally connected to its 1.5 miles of coastline," the lawsuit said. "More than half of Hoboken's residents, half of its schools and all of its hospitals, rail and ferry stations, and hazardous waste sites are within five feet of its high tide line.

"Sea level rise therefore threatens major sections of Hoboken with flooding at high tide."

Global warming caused by greenhouse gas emissions from cars, trucks, electric utilities and other industrial processes has caused the sea level to rise by nearly a foot in and around Hoboken, which is considerably more than the average around the world, the lawsuit said, adding: "Multiple additional feet of sea level rise are projected in the coming decades as a result of fossil fuel use."

The number of high tide flood days has already more than doubled since 2000, the lawsuit said, while climate change also threatens the city with more frequent and severe flooding from storm surge during coastal storms.

Other defendants named in the lawsuit include BP, Chevron, ConocoPhillips, Shell and the American Petroleum Institute, an oil and gas trade association.

"The climate harms masked by defendants' half-century of deception have now slammed into the shores of Hoboken," the lawsuit said. 

A representative of Exxon did not respond to a request for comment.

Paul Afonso, a senior vice president & chief legal officer for API, defended the organization, saying "the record of the past two decades demonstrates that the industry has achieved its goal of providing affordable, reliable American energy to U.S. consumers while substantially reducing emissions and our environmental footprint. Any suggestion to the contrary is false."

The lawsuit's fraud claim centers on documents showing that the fossil fuel industry has known for decades that the use of its products would result in catastrophic climate consequences.  The lawsuit credits a 2015  InsideClimate News series and a later story in the Los Angeles Times for revealing the extent of Exxon's knowledge, going back to the 1970s, about the central role of fossil fuels in causing climate change.

Hoboken is the 20th municipality, state or private organization to sue the fossil fuel industry over climate change since 2017. Other plaintiffs include Baltimore, Oakland and San Francisco; numerous counties in California, Colorado, Hawaii, Maryland, New York and Washington; and the states of Massachusetts, Rhode Island and Minnesota.

In the wake of hurricane Irene and Superstorm Sandy, Hoboken invested $500 million to build flood protection along its waterfront, including underground cisterns to store excess water and pump stations to expel storm water, the lawsuit said.

"Hoboken is at the forefront of climate change and our residents are literally paying the price," Mayor Bhalla said in announcing the lawsuit on Facebook.

"This shouldn't have to be on the backs of our residents and other government entities to shoulder the burden of these costs," Bhalla said. "We cannot stand idly by and allow big oil to continue profiteering at the expense of Hoboken residents. It's time these companies pay their fair share and be held accountable for their actions and their role in climate change."

The lawsuit seeks unspecified damages associated with the destruction of city-owned property from flooding, loss of tax revenue because of depressed property values and the slowdown of economic activity in the face of the on-going threat of climate change-induced severe weather.

"The fossil fuels driving defendants' billion-dollar profits, and defendants' lies about the risks of fossil fuels, are the cause of both the escalating climate harms experienced by Hoboken and the enormous costs the city now must undertake to abate them," the lawsuit said.

READ MORE


Contribute to RSN

Update My Monthly Donation




The GOP just tried to kick hundreds of students off the voter rolls

    This year, MAGA GOP activists in Georgia attempted to disenfranchise hundreds of students by trying to kick them off the voter rolls. De...