Tuesday, July 21, 2020

POLITICO NIGHTLY: He’s back





POLITICO Nightly: Coronavirus Special Edition
Presented by
With help from Myah Ward
SEASON TWO — When the novel coronavirus didn’t “go away” or “fade away” or “like a miracle” “sort of just disappear,” when the case count kept going up and his poll numbers kept going down, when his rally in Tulsa was an embarrassing flop and the next one was nixed because it was threatening to be another, it was inevitable that Donald Trump was going to resurrect the briefings that became, at least for a time early this spring, something of a hit show.
This president doesn’t like to cede or share the spotlight, and immediately conspicuous in the briefing room at the White House tonight was the absence of Mike Pence, of Tony Fauci and Deborah Birx, of any of the other collection of public health pros and administration officials who were recurring characters in these sessions back in March and April. “I alone can fix it,” Trump said in Cleveland, on July 21, 2016, and here he was, exactly four years later, alone.
Trump believes that appearances are paramount, “that how you look is more important than how you sound,” as Roger Stone once said to me, and “how you come across is more important than the words you use.” The stage in the White House is about as important as it gets. The person front and center there can’t help but look like he or she’s in charge. Trump gave it up some three months back — and ever since his standing has sunk.
The importance he places on visuals might be why, on that stage this evening, as he talked more than he ever has about the importance of wearing a mask, he didn’t wear one. He took his mask out of his suit pocket to show it to reporters — but he didn’t put it on.
And lastly, and this is one of Trump’s most deep-seated convictions, he believes he can make something so simply by saying it enough times and with enough force. He is ever endeavoring to bend reality to his will, to succeed without actually having to succeed, channeling the relentless, practically blind optimism of Norman Vincent Peale. Yet tonight, at times, he sounded uncharacteristically realistic. “It will, probably, unfortunately,” he said, “get worse before it gets better — something I don’t like saying, but that’s the way it is.”
But Peale won out in the end. Trump reiterated his contention that “the virus will disappear.” And one of the last things he said? It had nothing to do with the coronavirus. “The stock market,” he said, “had another good day.”
So it went in the less-than-a-half-hour episode of the second season of Trump’s coronavirus briefings. When it comes, though, to second seasons, it’s worth recalling that Trump’s track record isn’t good. It was the first season of “The Apprentice” that was by far the most successful. And this, needless to say — managing this pandemic, or even the public perception of how he’s doing — is a hell of a lot harder than making reality TV.
Nightly video player of President Donald Trump's coronavirus briefing

A message from Emergent BioSolutions:
Our global team is going full speed to develop potential therapies that may help treat COVID-19. At the same time, we’re collaborating on innovative vaccine candidates that can be made by the millions. Discover what we’re doing right now.

Welcome to POLITICO Nightly: Coronavirus Special Edition. Wish me luck — I’m off for the next few days while I attempt a cross state move. I’ll be back next Tuesday. Reach out rrayasam@politico.com or on Twitter at @renurayasam .
THE NIGHTLY DEBATE
Nightly asked: If you were in charge of your school district or university, how would you design the fall semester? If you have children in school or college, what are your plans for their education this year? Answers have been edited and emphasis added in bold.
“If a vaccine can reach us by December, I would postpone the start of the school year by those three months. Worst case, it buys time to prepare the district for a potential return.
“If for some reason we are compelled to have school, I would focus on online classes for a daily period of time, but also would schedule recess/playground time/social activities for small groups that bring kids back to school on a staggered schedule that is optimized to have as few people on campus at a single time as possible.
“The greatest issue is for working parents. How do they keep their jobs and care for their kids at home? One way to attempt to address this is by having trusted groups of families that can support multiple kids at one home. A better solution would be to offer Caretaker Basic Income that pays a parent $2,000 to $2,500 per month, depending on their cost of living, to stay at home during the period kids are required to take at-home and online classes. I would also add a broadband stipend to make sure that kids have access to sufficient internet for their classes and potentially even to buy a low end laptop.
“As far as my kids: 10, 13 and 16. What I wrote is exactly what I suggested when I was asked.” — Mark Cuban, owner of the Dallas Mavericks
“My kids, 3 and 6 years old, are slated to go back to day care and school in a few weeks. It’s clear that they need more socialization and stimulation, and working full-time while parenting isn’t sustainable. But I still feel deeply ambivalent about sending them back, even though I live in a state that currently has low community spread. It’s infuriating that the federal government’s failure to respond to the pandemic has put parents, teachers and kids in this impossible position.” — Julia Marcus, epidemiologist at Harvard Medical school
“In my ideal world, school districts would shift to providing flexible resources for those families, up to and including refunding or voucherizing some of the money the system would have spent educating their children in person. Some parents desperately need someone to keep their children safe and supervised during the day and are being offered Zoom tutorials on how to make dioramas instead. Meanwhile, parents of older or more independent children may have less need for oversight, but are utterly at sea when it comes to administering trigonometry lessons.
"For many households, an education rebate of a few thousand dollars — a small fraction of the amount that the average public school district spends per student — could mean the ability to buy computers and textbooks or hire tutors and babysitters they otherwise couldn't afford. The vouchers or rebates could create a large market for innovative solutions, and maybe restore some sense of control to the millions of parents who feel battered by circumstance under coronavirus.” — Katherine Mangu-Ward, editor-in-chief, Reason magazine
“What I have heard about school reopening is alarming. Remote learning is hugely challenging for parents and teachers who have young kids. But by saying that we're going to reopen without having achieved a certain metric or achieved safety based on data and science seems very dangerous to me. Thankfully, my son graduated from college but my daughter is going to remote learn. Reopening and pretending that we're not facing a deadly global pandemic that has been completely mishandled by the White House and in my state by the governor is a recipe for disaster.” — Rep. Veronica Escobar (D-Texas)
“My children are going back to school on time and in full — as they should, and as all of America should. I would encourage all schools to go back, adopting whatever standards they deem appropriate, so long as it’s in person and fully functioning. Parents and kids need it — and science demonstrates we can open safely.”
— REP. CHIP ROY (R-TEXAS)
“If our public schools open, we’ll send our kids. But now they’re planning to start online, so I wish we could focus less on this debate and more on designing a virtual classroom experience that isn’t a total joke. Last spring was basically two days of homework and three days of Fortnite — I’m pretty sure we can do better than that. Plus I suck at algebra.” — Matt Bai, contributing columnist for The Washington Post
“I would use alternative learning spaces to maximize the amount of face-to-face learning children have with a teacher and would demand substantial investments from our federal government so our school district can hire more teachers. I would also encourage cities to repurpose unused spaces like theatres , office spaces, and design spaces to classrooms. I would fight to increase experiential and outdoor learning opportunities for kids. Outdoor spaces are much safer for kids making this pandemic an opportune time for children to learn more about their relationship to the environment and work on outdoor science experiments. I would encourage parks department personnel to become a major contributor to outdoor experiential learning.
“We need to ensure every child and teacher has access to Wi-Fi and stipends for any books. For any in-person activities, I would make masks and gloves mandatory, consistently encourage Covid testing amongst staff and students, and make cleaning and ventilation services mandatory.
“Our own kids will be returning to school on a part-time basis in accordance with our local department of education.” — Jamaal Bowman, Democratic New York congressional candidate
“I would have the children come into school on rotating days, and I would provide businesses with tax credits if they give unused space to schools so that the kids can separate more. I’d require masks, improve ventilation, and I would also experiment with pooling corona tests: If possible, have multiple people contribute to one sample so that you can cheaply and easily see if anyone has tested positive before going through the expense of testing individuals.” — Nicholas Thompson, editor-in-chief, Wired magazine
“The risks and feasibility of opening schools will hinge on the prevalence of Covid-19 in their community. If we were to open schools in Austin today, we estimate that a school with 500 students might have three students show up infected during the first week alone. The more we are able to slow spread and reduce cases, the more feasible and safe opening schools will be.” — Lauren Ancel Meyers, a professor of integrative biology at the University of Texas at Austin
“The decision on whether to reopen schools in person, online or with a mix is ultimately up to local school districts, teachers and public health officials. I am committed to supporting schools by pushing for passage of the Coronavirus Child Care and Education Relief Act. This legislation provides $430 billion to assist child care facilities, K-12 school districts and institutions of higher education with reopening costs.” — Sen. Tim Kaine (D-Va.)
“Let 1,000 vouchers bloom. Schools face very difficult choices this fall, between higher risks of infection and worse learning outcomes. We should admit we don’t know how to make these choices well collectively, and empower parents to choose instead. Take the per-student school budget and offer a big fraction of it to parents as a voucher, to pay for home schooling they run themselves, for a neighbor to set up a one-house schoolhouse, for a larger private school, or to use at a qualifying local public school. Each option would set its own learning policies and also policies on distancing and testing. Let parents weigh family infection risks against learning quality risks, using what they know about available options, and their children’s risks, learning styles and learning priorities.
“Yes, schools may suffer a large initial revenue shortfall this way; maybe they could rent out some rooms to new private school ventures. Yes, some children will end up with regretful schooling outcomes, though that seems inevitable no matter what we do. Yes, there should be some limits on teaching quality, but we should be forgiving at first; after all, public schools don’t know how to ensure quality here either. And maybe let any allowed option start a month or two late, if they also end later next summer; after all, we aren’t giving them much time to get organized.”  Robin Hanson, economist at George Mason University
“As a pediatrician and parent, I know how important it is to get students back in the classroom. We all want that. And with each day that passes, we know that communities of color — and students in those communities — likely will suffer disproportionately, just as we’ve seen with Blacks, Latinos and Native Americans across the nation in the first six months of this pandemic. In America, property taxes provide a large part of the funding for schools, so wealthy communities may be able to make the necessary changes while schools in lower income communities are left behind. We immediately need federal and state resources in place so that schools can reopen safely and equitably. Without adequate funding and better control of this pandemic, we’re setting ourselves up for failure. And tragically, we’ll be failing the students who can least afford this lost time to learn and thrive.”
— RICHARD BESSER, PRESIDENT AND CEO ROBERT WOOD JOHNSON FOUNDATION
“I’d set in-person education back to start as soon as community transmission is under control, we have highly accessible universal Covid testing and the most vigorous contact tracing program possible. If we were to issue stay at home orders in Texas now, and then use the time while we are at home to put these pieces in place, we could open up for in-person education as early as October.
“We have three kids who attend public schools in El Paso. They will be starting 8th, 7th and 4th grades this fall. Our school district has given us the choice between hybrid (in-person and distance learning) and distance learning only. We will choose distance learning only until the conditions are in place to protect the teachers, support staff and other educators, the kids, and the parents and grandparents of kids.” — Beto O’Rourke, former Texas congressman and former presidential candidate
I say, without a hint of sarcasm, that I have never been happier about not being in charge of our school district or my university. Going back in person seems very unlikely in parts of the country experiencing a spiking pandemic. I suspect most K-12 districts and colleges will be online sooner rather than later, and we need to focus tremendous energy and resources on improving that experience for young, low-income and other disadvantaged students — in other words, those who will be hurt the most by a lack of face-to-face learning this fall.
“I have a high school and a college student, my wife is an early childhood teacher, and I teach at the college level. The college student will be online through the fall if not all year; the high schooler has the option for f2f or online and wants to try f2f. My school of education is online through the fall, except for one program that will need to be at least partially f2f … and guess which program I teach in this fall? Every day we read reports that all basically say (1) You’re probably fine to go back, (2) but the science is still all over the place, (3) so use your best judgment. We all want to get back to f2f as soon as possible, but at what cost? It’s a constant source of anxiety for us.” — Jonathan Plucker, professor in the Johns Hopkins School of Education
“Had I been in charge of a school district in May, our team would’ve set as our goal having all students in class full-time in September. Then we would’ve figured out all of the things necessary to get that done safely; and if full-time and in-person wasn't possible, we would’ve gradually worked back from there. The idea would be to return to normal schedules as swiftly as conditions allow — but no swifter. Having said that, we have to realize that even if each of America's 13,500 school districts set that very same goal, they’d reach very different conclusions. District to district, there are big differences in how crowded schools are, how many buses are needed, the prevalence of Covid cases, the views of parents, the views of teachers and more. This is where America's highly decentralized system of schools shows its value.
“America is big and diverse, and conditions and sentiments will change. So the national picture that emerges this fall might look completely unintelligible when viewed from the nation’s capital, but it could well be intelligent from viewed from each particular district." — Andy Smarick, senior fellow, Manhattan Institute
“I think it is important to have community transmission controlled before you can discuss having in-person education. We still don’t understand enough about the transmission dynamics between kids and from kids to adults. We know that asymptomatic transmission is a problem and do not know enough about how children with asymptomatic (or even symptomatic disease) do long term. We would feel horrible in 6 months if we found out that putting kids in a setting and they were to get this disease put them at risk for long term medical problems.” — Krutika Kuppalli, infectious diseases physician and vice chair of the Global Health Committee at the Infectious Diseases Society of America
“The name of the game is options and adaptability. Options for parents and staff for online, hybrid and in-person learning. Adaptability to respond to local and individual health and educational issues. We must not underestimate the educational urgencies for students in our quest for good health and safety. We all need to come to terms with levels of risk, make personal decisions for our health, family and educational needs, and wear masks damnit!” — Margaret Spellings, secretary of Education under President George W. Bush
“I have zero new ideas about this but one. It teaches patience. It teaches ‘This too shall pass.’ Free cars take every school kid every day to a drive-in movie about vaccine development. The current catastrophe would make watching the boring PowerPoints and medical exams more exciting. As soon as the vaccine is approved, and the first 100 million doses made, the kids get their shots, sleep off the side effects, and head into winter break dreaming of spring semester and what we will pretend is normal.” — Virginia Heffernan, the host of “Trumpcast” and a columnist for the Los Angeles Times, Wired and the Economist’s 1843

DON'T MISS - POLITICO'S NEW "FUTURE PULSE" NEWSLETTER: The coronavirus pandemic accelerated long-simmering trends in health care technology and one thing is certain: The health care system that emerges from this crisis will be fundamentally different than the one that entered. From Congress and the White House, to state legislatures and Silicon Valley, Future Pulse spotlights the politics, policies, and technologies driving long-term change on the most personal issue for voters: Our health. SUBSCRIBE NOW.


FIRST IN NIGHTLY
CHILD CARE’S COVID CRISIS — The collapse of the child care industry is threatening to stoke racial and gender inequities and putting pressure on Congress to address the crisis in its new round of coronavirus aid.
Black and Latina women are suffering a double-barreled blow as coronavirus-induced shutdowns batter the industry, Eleanor Mueller writes, because they dominate the ranks of child care providers and have long struggled to gain access to the services for their own kids.
The sector, which saw 60 percent of its programs close at the height of the pandemic before rebounding slightly, is still down some 237,000 workers from last year — a number that’s likely to grow as states shut down again, economists say. Some projections show the industry could permanently lose half its programs. Two in 5 child care providers this month said they will shut for good without an infusion of federal funding.

A message from Emergent BioSolutions:
Advertisement Image 

COVID-2020
THE HAGGLING CONTINUES — Senate Republicans and the White House remain plagued by deep ideological divides over major elements of the next coronavirus relief package, creating an opening for Democrats as the pace of negotiations accelerates, John Bresnahan, Marianne LeVine and Andrew Desiderio write.
With coronavirus cases soaring across the country, the U.S. economy in near tatters, and elections just over 100 days away, senior White House officials and the Senate GOP leadership have yet to find agreement on big portions of the soon-to-be-released Republican proposal. They’re still undecided on whether to propose a payroll tax cut or how to respond to the end of enhanced unemployment payments for millions of Americans. Those $600-per-week unemployment checks begin to phase out in a few days.
ASK THE AUDIENCE
Nightly asks you: Have you gotten tested for Covid-19? Do you want to get tested but are unable to? Tell us your testing experience. Send us your story with our form and we’ll include some of the responses in Friday’s Nightly.
A disinfection worker sprays anti-septic solution in a theater in Seoul.
A disinfection worker sprays antiseptic solution in a theater in Seoul. | Getty Images
THE GLOBAL FIGHT
COVID FUNDING WITH STRINGS ATTACHED — With governments at risk of sinking under massive Covid-related debt, and demand for financial support from international organizations outstripping supply, the terms of public relief funding are tightening around the world, Ryan Heath writes.
After more than 90 hours of negotiating among European national leaders, the EU’s executive arm (the European Commission) this morning won permission to borrow $865 billion from financial markets to help the most beleaguered EU countries — including Italy and Spain — recover from Covid-19. The breakthrough came only after a group of frugal EU countries insisted that half the funds be delivered as loans rather than grant payments, and that $350 billion be tied to policy reforms. A separate push to attach rule of law conditions to the funding failed amid questions around how it could be enforced.
The International Monetary Fund is shifting to attaching green conditions to its next round of Covid-19 support, after more than 100 countries have asked, now that emergency support has been delivered. Meanwhile, national governments are applying strict conditionality on business aid: no dividends or share buybacks for example, and nothing for businesses registered in tax havens. NGOs are joining the pile-on, arguing for green conditions and human rights due diligence as Covid funding conditions.

JOIN THURSDAY AT 1:30 p.m. EDT – A GLOBAL RALLYING CRY: The Black Lives Matter movement has gone global with anti-racism protests sweeping cities around the world. What does the racial reckoning look like abroad? Join Global Translations author Ryan Heath for a conversation on how the fight for equality has become a worldwide rallying cry following the killing of George Floyd. REGISTER HERE.


NIGHTLY NUMBER
31
The number of states on the New York and New Jersey list from which travelers are subject to a two-week quarantine upon arrival. An additional 10 states were added to the list today as Covid-19 caseloads continue to surge in much of the country, which is updated weekly.
PARTING WORDS
SUMMER RETURNS IN MOSCOW — It wasn’t that long ago, in early June, that Russia’s capital Moscow was eerily quiet as the Kremlin enforced one of the world’s harshest coronavirus lockdowns. With the capital reporting more than 10,000 new cases a day, residents needed special permission via QR codes on their phones for trips outside, and most Muscovites cowered fearfully in their flats.
Flash forward nearly two months and the contrast couldn’t be greater, Vijai Maheshwari writes: Parks, restaurants, museums, gyms, night clubs — even strip clubs — are open once again. Ever since Russian President Vladimir Putin jolted the city out of its corona slumber with a massive June 24 Victory Day parade to celebrate the 75th anniversary of World War II, Moscow is churning at full blast again. The cavalier attitude toward wearing masks and social distancing among most Russians makes a deadlier second wave in the fall — or sooner — even more likely. But for now, the corona nihilists have the upper hand in Russia: A survey by Moscow’s Higher School of Economics found that a staggering third of Russians don’t believe in the coronavirus pandemic and consider the threat to be exaggerated.

A message from Emergent BioSolutions:
We go after public health threats. In the fight against COVID-19, we are going full speed to develop potential new therapies and vaccine candidates.
We go for critical innovations. We are developing two potential hyperimmune treatments for severe hospitalized COVID-19 patients and individuals at risk. Based on proven technology, the research and testing are underway.
We go in partnership with others. We are working with industry innovators to bring COVID-19 vaccine candidates to market. We have the capacity to manufacture vaccines in the tens to hundreds of millions, and we are propelling development forward.
We go. And go. From fighting anthrax to helping prevent smallpox and developing vaccine candidates, we go all in. Because public health threats will never stop. And neither will we.

See how we go all in.

Did someone forward this email to you? Sign up here.

Follow us on Twitter
Renuka Rayasam @renurayasam

FOLLOW US

 POLITICO, LLC 1000 Wilson Blvd. Arlington, VA, 22209, USA












RSN: FOCUS: We All Know Donald Trump Is Preparing to Rig or Steal the Election - but Exactly How?





Reader Supported News
21 July 20

Everything? In effect yes. What's the cost of RSN? If it offsets Corporate Information Monopoly then it undermines the monopoly and it no longer costs, it benefits.
RSN, the benefits are huge.
Marc Ash
Founder, Reader Supported News


If you would prefer to send a check:
Reader Supported News
PO Box 2043
Citrus Hts, CA 95611




Reader Supported News
21 July 20
It's Live on the HomePage Now:
Reader Supported News





FOCUS: We All Know Donald Trump Is Preparing to Rig or Steal the Election - but Exactly How?
Donald Trump at a rally. (photo: David Hume Kennerly/Getty Images)
Bob Cesca, Salon
Cesca writes: "By now, it's relatively easy to forecast Donald Trump's tyrannical moves. There are no advanced Frank Underwood-style chess gambits in play here. It's barely Candyland, despite the fascistic goals involved."

There's zero possibility that Trump will accept defeat with dignity. We need to prepare for weeks of dreadful chaos

Trump is, on top of it all, a simple-minded, easily predictable Golgothan who telegraphs every move of self-preservation. Sometimes it can be reassuring to have a sense of where he's going with his repetitious blurts. At other times it leaves us with this perpetual sense of instability, knowing what might be lurking around the corner. The November election fits horrifyingly into the latter category. 
I believe I know how Trump will try to interfere with the process as well as the outcome, and it's more than a little unnerving, especially given the cataclysmic stakes this time. Warning: This is a bit of a horror show, so hang on tight. Oh, and everything that follows presumes a close race, with the advantage leaning in Joe Biden's direction.
We're all brutally aware that every move Trump makes is aimed squarely at re-election. If he's not re-elected, he could face criminal prosecution and dozens of lawsuits after he returns to being a private citizen. He knows better than anyone that the presidency is the only thing saving him either from the slammer or from an underground escape to a non-extradition country. 
As part of his herky-jerky maneuvers to evade legal jeopardy, we also know he's willing to sentence hundreds of thousands of Americans to death, and millions more on top of that to suffer from permanent pre-existing conditions, due to his near-genocidal indifference to the pandemic — indifference aimed at manipulating the stock market and thereby boosting in his re-election chances. It's a matter of historical record that he was impeached by Congress and put on trial for trying to cheat in the election, while refusing to discourage Russia from cyber-attacking the process again. 
You get the point. He's capable of doing anything in order to win, even risking his legal future. But none of the above tactics directly addresses how he might handle the actual process of suppressing and overturning votes. 
Like a petulant boy who tosses a board game across the room when he's losing, Trump is going to hurl the election process into absolute chaos. Here's how: He'll continue to suppress voting by discouraging absentee voting, while benefiting from new and existing roadblocks to in-person voting. Then, on and after Election Day, he'll sue to try and stop absentee ballots from being counted.
You might have seen the unintentionally hilarious video of Trump on "Fox News Sunday" last weekend. During his sweaty, lie-filled exchange with Chris Wallace, the president once again repeated, "I think mail-in voting is going to rig the election." He also said that he might not accept the outcome of the election. "I have to see," Trump said when pressed on the question. Absentee voting, also known as "mail-in" voting, will be his primary target in his plan to derail the election. (Point of order: all mail-in ballots are absentee, including the president's ballots. I will therefore use the term "absentee" from this point forward.) 
Election Day won't be a "day" at all this year. In fact, some estimates suggest we won't know the winner of the presidential election, let alone contested Senate and House races, for a week or more after Nov. 3, mainly due to the record number of absentee ballots used during pandemic conditions. It'll take days to electronically tabulate all those votes, and maybe weeks for hand-counted ballots in some precincts. I'm not even factoring in the possibility of recanvassing or actual recounts. 
So far, 33 states and the District of Columbia allow some form of voting by mail without an excuse for one's absence. (Oregon has conducted all elections by mail since 1998, with no significant problems. Colorado and Washington state have adopted universal vote-by-mail more recently.) By the way, the absentee voting states include Florida, where Trump will be voting by mail this year — again, with no excuse needed. The other 17 states require an excuse, but at least some of those will likely change the rules before November, eliminating the need for an excuse.
The main focus of Trump's shrieking about absentee voting, of course, is to establish a hearts-and-minds framework to support legal challenges against those ballots. To that end, he's routinely exploiting the bully pulpit to manufacture doubt about the reliability of absentee voting. From there, he's capable of launching a series of lawsuits against boards of elections — perhaps in every state where absentee ballots are used, or just in states with margins too close to call. As long as he continues to hammer his loyalists about the evils of absentee voting between now and Election Day, they'll be increasingly likely to back him up during the actual process, organizing demonstrations and maybe a few "Brooks Brothers riots" not unlike Election 2000.
Any and all swing states will be ripe for legal challenges — not because of actual election or voter fraud but simply because Trump believes there's fraud taking place. (Or, to be more accurate, because he claims to believe that.)
The other point is to discourage the use of absentee ballots, with the broader goal of convincing pro-Trump state officials to roll back existing absentee rules. After all, it's much more difficult to monkey around with absentee votes that, by definition, include a paper trail. On the other hand, in-person votes cast on electronic voting machines are more susceptible to manipulation and hacking, whether by Russian agents or someone else, and we all know about Trump's business partners in Moscow and their track record with American elections. In his desperation, Trump will be eager to meddle with every voting format, covering all his bases.
Challenge after challenge could rocket-propel the entire election back into the hands of the Supreme Court, home of the infamous Bush v. Gore decision, and there's no guarantee that Chief Justice John Roberts will swing the way we hope he will. Irrespective of where Trump's legal challenges land, he will absolutely use the courts as a delaying action, making for a hell of a long process at a time when the patience of the American people is practically nonexistent.
Electors are supposed to cast their ballots on Dec. 14, based on the results of the popular vote. If there's an actual declared winner by that date, I'll be shocked. Trump's legal challenges will be thick and he's shown zero compunction to give up. (See also his relentless legal challenges to protect his tax returns from prosecutors and congressional oversight.)
It's also possible that Trump's indefinite deployment of federal stormtroopers in selected cities will discourage some voters from turning out. Trump's screeching has also suggested that he might order ICE and CBP goons to monitor polling places, which could discourage Latino citizens or other recent immigrants from voting.
One more thing: As the days following the election descend into chaos, it wouldn't shock me if Trump simply declared victory before all the votes are counted. That won't mean much in the grand scheme, but it will further incite his people and worsen the chaos.
I don't know how all this will end, but I feel relatively secure in forecasting the mayhem. Honestly, as with everything Trump, I hope I'm wrong and this election wraps up without a glitch. But given King Joffrey the Flaccid's actions lately, especially with his contra-constitutional deployment of unidentified soldiers to disappear protesters from the streets, it would be foolish to count on a smooth ride. The absolute best strategy for the Democratic Party, and indeed all Normals, is to prepare for a bloody mess before we have a winner. The party ought to be fully lawyered up in anticipation of Trump's psycho-bombs detonating at polling places and in state capitals across the country. Don't be blindsided.
I think we can all agree that Donald Trump will not go quietly, or accept defeat with any measure of dignity. Knowing the stunts he's likely to pull, and preparing accordingly, is half the battle.

















RSN: FOCUS: Greg Palast | 22% of Mail-In Votes Never Get Counted








Reader Supported News
21 July 20
It's Live on the HomePage Now:
Reader Supported News


FOCUS: Greg Palast | 22% of Mail-In Votes Never Get Counted
Empty envelopes of opened vote-by-mail ballots. (photo: Jason Redmond/AFP/Getty Images)
Greg Palast, Greg Palast's Website
Palast writes: "It begins with a stone-cold fact: Mail-in ballots are lost by the millions - especially the ballots of low-income young and minority voters, those folks often called, 'Democrats.'"

 h, Lord, please don’t let me be misunderstood.”
I’ve been singing that Animals’ tune for a month. I move my lips, but I’m not sure my words are understood.
It begins with a stone-cold fact: Mail-in ballots are lost by the millions—especially the ballots of low-income young and minority voters, those folks often called, “Democrats.”
The seminal MIT study, Losing Votes by Mail, warns that 22% – more than one in five ballots – never get counted.
As the study concludes:
“If 20%, or even 10%, of voters who stood in line on Election Day were turned away, there would be national outrage. The estimates provided by this paper suggest that the equivalent may be happening among voters who seek to cast their ballots by mail, and yet there is nary a comment.”
Just because I point out this inconvenient truth doesn’t mean I’m against mail-in balloting. Just the opposite: I want to make sure we get through the mail-in minefield alive: fix the system so everyone who wants an absentee ballot gets one—or, at the minimum, we train Americans to vote absentee so that we are not defeated by the Jim Crow bias endemic to absentee voting.
In my new book, How Trump Stole 2020, my chapter “Mail-In Madness,” begs you to fix the broken mail-in system. I’ve been, weirdly, accused of joining Donald Trump in opposing mail-in voting. That’s insane. There is nothing orange-stained about my analysis. Let me be blunt: unless we get the Jim Crow alligators out of our mailbox, and protect our postal votes, Trump has won—not with the voters but with the vote-challenging tricksters.
Jim Crow in the mail-box? Yep. Because not just anyone’s ballot is deep-sixed. Of the 3.3 million absentee ballots lost in 2016, it’s not random, voters of color and young voters find their absentee ballots—if they ever receive them—are the overwhelming targets of the vote vanishing operation.
A Caltech/MIT study, “Whose Absentee Votes Are Counted?” shows rejection rates higher for Democrats than Republicans, higher for younger than older voters, and higher for non-English ballots. Surprised?
Thousands of Korean-Americans, per their rights under federal law, filled in Korean-language ballots which ask, in Korean, for the voter’s signature. Not surprisingly, the voters signed in Korean. All these ballots went straight into the garbage.
If you don’t get a ballot you can’t mail it in. Well, d’oh, Homer! According to the MIT study, most of the millions of absentee ballot lost are because one in nine voters never receive their ballot or it is received too late. Again, the “late” ballots are overwhelmingly slow-mailed to voters of color.
I spoke to an African-American voter who requested ballots for her family 45 days before the Georgia primary—and her husband’s ballot arrived on June 10. The Georgia Primary was June 9. Unsophisticated voter who screwed up? Hardly, this is Andrea Young, voting rights attorney and Executive Director of the ACLU of Georgia.
If they can shaft voting rights attorneys out of their vote, others don’t stand a chance.
One of the main reasons voters don’t get their ballots is that, in the past two years, 16.7 million voters have been purged, erased from the voter rolls and most don’t know it. It could be you. I can tell you it was me: I looked up Greg Palast on my Secretary of State’s website (you should all do that) and it said, “No such voter.”
And that’s how Trump Stole 2020—and 2016. The big swing state of Ohio, from 2012 to 2016, swung from a big Obama victory …to Trump. WTF?
One secret of the Ohio's flip to red is that the Republican Secretary of State in the month before the 2016 presidential election, simply refused to send absentee ballot application cards to 1,035,795 voters, those on the absurdly, inaccurately named “inactive” or “mover” lists. Voters lost their rights—without notice. The purge list was 2-to-1 Democrat.
With 16.7 million voters erased from the registration rolls in the past two years, millions will say, Where the hell is my ballot? Sorry: they’ll be S.O.L. (Google that.)
The Palast Investigations team went through several purge lists and we found that one in seven African-Americans and one in eight LatinX and Asian-American voters in these states were on the hit lists.
You can call it a “flawed” system, but it’s a fraud system, American Apartheid.
What can we do?
Plenty, Jackson. First check your registration. Second, check your registration – again. Third, if you don’t get your mail-in vote, contact your county registrar and demand it. One month before the election, Jackson, not November 2.
Now’s the hard part: filling out and mailing in your ballot. If you’re in Wisconsin, Michigan and many other states, don’t forget the witness signature. And make sure your witness is a verified voter – and verified virus free.
If you’re in swing state Missouri or in Alabama, where Sen. Doug Jones is in a fight for his life, you’ll need to find a notary to notarize your ballot. You may say that’s a poll tax—and just plain dangerous during a pandemic. But three weeks ago, the Supreme Court said that Alabama’s crazy notarization law was just fine.
And in 34 states, if you’re a first time voter, don’t forget to include a copy of your ID. If you’re in the ultimate swing state of Wisconsin and a student—you can only use a student ID if you also enclose a letter of proof of your enrollment in good standing at your school. Huh? You flunk algebra and lose your vote? I can’t make this up.
And if you include that extra paperwork, don’t forget to add a stamp for the extra weight: the US Elections Assistance Commission reports 100,000 ballots in 2016 were rejected for postage due.
Let me be blunt. Mail-in voting sucks – but if you don’t mail in your ballot, you could die. That sucks, too.
So, it’s all about protecting your mail-in ballot. Just know that’s not as simple as “pick and lick” – pick a president and lick the stamp.
There just ain’t enough white guys to re-elect Trump. So the GOP has to get rid of the non-white guys. And they are enlisting your friendly postman to Jim Crow your vote.












FAIR: How NOT to Resist Trump: Kayleigh McEnany’s Anti-Science Comments







FAIR
View article on FAIR's website

How NOT to Resist Trump: Kayleigh McEnany’s Anti-Science Comments


WaPo: McEnany on school reopenings: ‘The science should not stand in the way of this’
Washington Post (7/16/20)
Media, particularly those who have made a habit of rhetorically opposing Donald Trump for the past four years, were awash last week with White House press secretary Kayleigh McEnany’s controversial statements on reopening public schools in the middle of a pandemic. For example:
  • “McEnany on School Reopenings: ‘The Science Should Not Stand in the Way of This’” (Washington Post7/16/20)
  • “‘The Science Should Not Stand in the Way,’ McEnany Says of Reopening Schools” (New York Times7/16/20)
  • “White House: 'The Science Should Not Stand in the Way' of Reopening Schools – as It Happened” (Guardian7/16/20)
  • “'Science Should Not Stand in the Way' of Schools Reopening, White House Press Secretary Kayleigh McEnany Says” (USA Today7/16/20)
  • “White House Press Secretary: 'The Science Should Not Stand in the Way of' Schools Fully Reopening” (NBC News7/16/20)
  • “White House: ‘Science Should Not Stand in the Way’ of School Openings. Another Day, Another Astonishing Utterance From the Trump Administration on the Coronavirus” (Rolling Stone7/16/20)
The myriad of viral headlines suggested that this was another Orwellian outburst from the administration, along the lines of when George H. W. Bush said: “I’ll never apologize for the United States of America. Ever! I don’t care what the facts are.” But reading her full answer, or watching the video embedded in many of the reports, it becomes clear that the headlines are misrepresenting McEnany’s words. What she actually said was:
The president has said unmistakably that he wants schools to open. And I was just in the Oval [Office] talking to him about that. And when he says open, he means open in full — kids being able to attend each and every day at their school. The science should not stand in the way of this.
And as Dr. Scott Atlas said — I thought this was a good quote — Of course, we can [do it].  Everyone else in the…Western world, our peer nations are doing it. We are the outlier here.
The science is very clear on this, that — you know, for instance, you look at the JAMA Pediatrics study of 46 pediatric hospitals in North America that said the risk of critical illness from COVID is far less for children than that of seasonal flu. The science is on our side here, and we encourage for localities and states to just simply follow the science, open our schools.
It’s very damaging to our children: There is a lack of reporting of abuse, there’s mental depressions that are not addressed, suicidal ideations that are not addressed when students are not in school. Our schools are extremely important, they’re essential, and they must reopen.
In other words, the White House is arguing that the science shouldn’t be a problem because it doesn’t stand in their way. But this is certainly not how it was presented to the public by many journalistic outlets.
Some outlets did give a fuller explanation of McEnany’s comments. MSNBC (7/17/20), for example, noted that, “To many, that made it sound as if the White House press secretary was arguing that science was an impediment to Donald Trump's preference,” before explaining that the true context “casts McEnany's controversial quote in a less embarrassing light.” Yet the headline for the article explaining the confusion was “White House: ‘Science Should Not Stand in the Way’ of School Openings,’” which only served to double the muddle.
Around 59% of people do not read past the headline before sharing an article, making it especially important that they convey accurate information. A majority of people seeing these headlines will have been given a misleading picture of events.
Daily Wire: Left-Wing Journalists Misleadingly Quote Kayleigh McEnany On Opening Schools, Science
The Daily Wire (7/17/20) used the McEnany quote as an opportunity to go after "left-wing journalists."
The media mishandling of McEnany’s remarks led to a field day for the right-wing press, portraying the Trump administration as unfairly under attack from the leftist establishment (e.g., Daily Caller7/17/20; Daily Wire7/17/20National Review7/17/20). “The shameless charlatans in the liberal media were at it again on Thursday, engaging in fake news,” wrote Newsbusters (7/16/20). “The entire corporate media complex have conspired to deliberately lie and mislead the public,” Breitbart (7/17/20) told its readers.
McEnany herself (Twitter7/16/20) described it as a “case study in media bias”:
I said: “The science is very clear on this...the science is on our side here. We encourage our localities & states to just simply follow the science. Open our schools.” But leave it to the media to deceptively suggest I was making the opposite point!
The problem with this narrative, of course, is that her comments were anti-science. A huge new study from the Center for Disease Control (CDC) itself, released the same day as McEnany’s comments, found that children aged 10–19 (i.e., kids in elementary, middle and high school) spread the disease at least as well as adults do, meaning any reopening will certainly worsen the situation, leading to deaths, not necessarily of students, but of teachers, grandparents, other public transport users, or anyone else coming into contact with them.
Pretending that opening schools has no consequences for adults is itself deeply misleading. While some other Western nations have reopened schools, they have done so in a context of drastically reduced new cases; in many instances, virtually zero. On July 16, the day of McEnany’s comments, the United States set a worldwide all-time high for new daily cases, 73,388. Comparing the US to the likes of Germany or New Zealand (July 16 cases: 560 and one, respectively) is scientific malpractice.
Not only did other Western countries wait until their infection rates were much lower before reopening schools, they also took great care to reduce the chances that schoolchildren would transmit the virus to themselves or others. Time (7/20/20) described how Denmark reopened schools on April 15, when the country was averaging 30 new cases per million people per day (compared to the US’s current 202 cases per million per day):
When children ages 2–12 returned to school, they were sectioned off into “micro groups” of 12. These groups—also known as “protective bubbles”—arrive to school at staggered times, eat lunch separately and have their own zones in the playground. All students are required to wash their hands every two hours but do not have to wear face masks. Desks are divided two meters apart, all education material must be cleaned twice a day and when possible, classes are held outside. Parents are not allowed on school property.
91-DIVOC: Israel average new cases per million per day
Transmission in reopened schools is blamed for a dramatic resurgence of Covid-19 in Israel (chart: 91-DIVOC).
Some countries that reopened schools with less stringent protocols have come to regret it. “Israelis Fear Schools Reopened Too Soon as Covid-19 Cases Climb” was a July 14 headline in the Wall Street Journal, with the subhead, “Outbreaks in Schools Had Infected at Least 1,335 Students and 691 Staff by Monday Since the Reopening in Early May.”
Just as the pandemic began, the Trump administration attempted to slash the CDC’s budget, the president in February brushing off the idea that Covid-19 would be worse than the flu as a liberal “hoax” intended to unseat him. After accepting its validity, he touted ineffective drugs as miracle cures and even suggested that injecting bleach into the body could cure the sick. This is in keeping with the administration’s general contempt for sciences, such as its grossly downplaying the threat of climate change, with Trump himself labeling it a Chinese invention, while claiming the noise from wind farms causes cancer.
Unfortunately, this latest scandal perfectly encapsulates much of corporate media’s apparent resistance to Trump, in that it avoids a substantive critique in favor of catching the administration out on technical grounds. Resisting the reopening of schools on the basis that the White House press secretary misspoke represents a lost opportunity to actually oppose the administration’s scandalously poor handling of the coronavirus, and the dangerous, genuinely anti-science decision to force through reopening in the height of a pandemic.
Most US adults, including more than nine in ten Republicans, say they have lost trust in the media in recent years. This sort of sloppy faux-adversarial journalism in the pursuit of clicks will do nothing to reverse this trend. Is further eroding your industry’s credibility worth a few more eyeballs? Apparently, the answer is yes.











Judges are failing to disclose luxury trips, too

  May 4, 2024 Through a  series of shocking investigations  last year, we learned that sitting Supreme Court justices had made a habit of ac...