Saturday, December 23, 2023

Informed Comment daily updates (12/23/2023)

 

Israelis have killed the same Percentage of Gazans in 11 Weeks as Allies did Italians in all of WW II

Israelis have killed the same Percentage of Gazans in 11 Weeks as Allies did Italians in all of WW II

Ann Arbor (Informed Comment) – The UN reports figures from the Gaza Ministry of Health as of Friday: “between 7 October and 7:00 on 22 December, at least 20,057 Palestinians were killed in Gaza. About 70 per cent of those killed are said to be women and children. As of then, 53,320 Palestinians have been […]

Meta (Facebook and Instagram) is Systemically Censoring Palestine Content

Meta (Facebook and Instagram) is Systemically Censoring Palestine Content

Human Rights Watch – (New York) – Meta’s content moderation policies and systems have increasingly silenced voices in support of Palestine on Instagram and Facebook in the wake of the hostilities between Israeli forces and Palestinian armed groups, Human Rights Watch said in a report released today. The 51-page report, “Meta’s Broken Promises: Systemic Censorship of […]

A “Delicate Matter”: Clarence Thomas’ Private Complaints About Money Sparked Fears among Rich that He Would Resign

A “Delicate Matter”: Clarence Thomas’ Private Complaints About Money Sparked Fears among Rich that He Would Resign

By Justin Elliott, Joshua Kaplan, Alex Mierjeski and Brett Murphy | – ( ProPublica ) – Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas’ decadeslong friendship with real estate tycoon Harlan Crow and Samuel Alito’s luxury travel with billionaire Paul Singer have raised questions about influence and ethics at the nation’s highest court. In early January 2000, Supreme […]

Old posts you may have missed

Just Say No: Biden Must Create Peace out of the Gaza Crisis and Rein in the Israeli Right

Gaza Crisis: US-Led Taskforce deploys in Red Sea and Considers Strikes on Yemen

The US and China at Year’s End: Still Treading on the Precipice

If you Prick us, do We not Bleed? – Shakespeare in Gaza

Hamtramck, Michigan, City Council Votes to rename Street in Support of Palestine

2023’s extreme Storms, Heat and Wildfires broke Records, and Burning Fossil Fuels Played a big Part

How Big Oil is Taking us for a Fossil-Fuelized Ride: With the World the Hottest in 125,000 Years, we’re being Gaslighted




BLACKMAIL: Rep. Tim Burchett raises new accusations of sex and bribery scandals in Congress

 

BLACKMAIL: Rep. Tim Burchett raises new accusations of sex and bribery scandals in Congress

Representative Tim Burchett (R-TN) had a conversation on Thursday, one that he will likely regret, with MAGA influencer and all-around slimeball Benny Johnson.

We cannot tell whether Burchett was into the eggnog a little early or whether he just went straight to crack, but he complained to Benny that Republicans could be a lot more reliable in their voting if they could just stay out of honey pots when they travel and maybe show some discipline?

Burchett noted that a lot of powerful people had no trouble blackmailing conservatives to vote a certain way.

Now, perhaps we’re reading a little too much into this, but if one looks at the votes they are most mad about, the continuing resolutions, doesn’t that mean that maybe Speaker Mike Johnson is, you know, a little hypocritical?

Benny had asked about why so many people were mad at Marsha Blackburn for pushing to get the Jeffrey Epstein client list unsealed. And then Benny alluded to the fact that it seemed as though Burchett had been a Blackburn opponent in the situation over in the House. (Video Below)

There is one obvious possible answer, but Burchett didn’t want to talk about himself. So, instead, he talked about his friends. The Congressman answered by throwing his party over the bus, across the road, and down the cliff, with enough momentum to hit a dozen trees before landing in the creek 500 feet below, hoping the helicopter can lift 222 people up.

(I took the meaningless portions out and just kept the “pertinent stuff” in paragraphs that are readable):

“Well, let’s be honest, in powerful people in this country (sic). They write the big checks, and they, you know, they’re the ones out on the tarmac when the president comes…”

Ummm, mostly, we see local officials. Big business people do their stuff over the phone or in closed-door meetings. That is how they become big business folks. Most don’t have much trouble with this because people are throwing themselves at big money all the time.

“They protect the people that do that. And by doing so, you know, the old honey pot — the Russians do that — and I’m sure members of Congress have been caught up.”

Hold up, hold up. Given that you come from a party that is single-handedly holding up money to help Ukraine, you must be talking about a lot of Republicans falling into honey pot traps.

Additionally, Congressman, please do not act like we’re babes in the woods. A lot of the time, the “honey” is nothing more than “money,” and y’all drown yourselves in whatever is your thing.

Speaking of which:

“Why in the world would good conservatives vote for crazy stuff like what we’ve been seeing out of Congress? Here’s how it works. You’re visiting, you’re out of the country or out of town or you’re in a motel or at a bar in DC and, whatever you’re into – women, men, whatever — comes up and they’re very attractive and they’re laughing at your jokes. And you’re buying them a drink. Next thing you know, you’re in the motel room with them naked.”

You do know that you’re describing a frat party and not mature, disciplined people who are aware of the “traps” that surround them day to day, right, Congressman?

“And next thing you know, you know you’re about to make a key vote. And what happens? Some well-dressed person comes out and whispers in your ear, “Hey, man, there’s tapes out on you.” Or, “Were you in a motel room or whatever with whoever?” And then you’re like, “Oh,” and [they] said, “you really ought not be voting for this thing.”

 And then you are looking up whether anyone has a reliable time machine, right, Congressman? 

“You know? And what do they do? It’s human nature.”

HOLD UP AGAIN: Burchett is apparently unaware that it is also human nature to keep themselves from these thorny issues by standing back and thinking, “My wife and daughter would be pretty disgusted with me if I… and I love them so much anyway… I think it’s best to just walk away.” As if this part of being a mature human  is beyond the grasp of powerful people like Burchett’s friends.

“And, you know, no man or no woman actually is an island.”

Interesting metaphor in this context because no one cares about “being” an island. We are more concerned about who was “on” a particular island. But do go on

“And they know what to get at. You know, if it’s women, drugs, booze, it’ll find you. And they say, and in most elected offices, and that’s what people of power and influence do. And it’s just, you know, I’ve been in this game my whole life. I spent 16 years in the state legislature in Tennessee and eight years as county mayor. And now I’m in my fifth year Congress. But it’s just — the stakes are higher. But the game is still the same.”

Rep. Burchett seems quite conversant in this game. We should all go back and check his votes and see if we find any that seem a little out of character for the old boy. Emphasis on “boy.” Then check “motel” registries.

There is an easy way to avoid all this; it is called having a grasp on how to “adult this world” when needed.

Because it is not a game, we had a president who was subservient to Russia for some reason, and the damages coming from that particular event haven’t even been tallied up yet.

Jesus, these people. 


Hat tip to Mediaite for the transcript

I can be reached at jasonmiciak@gmail.com and on “X” @JasonMiciak

Editor’s Note: This is an opinion piece reflecting the opinion of the author alone

https://washingtonpress.com/2023/12/22/blackmail-rep-tim-burchett-raises-new-accusations-of-sex-and-bribery-scandals-in-congress/




BOMBSHELL: Trump was recorded pressuring Michigan election officials

 

BOMBSHELL: Trump was recorded pressuring Michigan election officials




Donald Trump has been caught on an audio recording contacting two election canvassers in Michigan, and directing them to refuse to sign documents certifying the 2020 election outcome. The recording took place only days after the election, but is only now being revealed publicly.

Trump, along with RNC Chair Ronna McDaniel, had contacted Monica Palmer and William Hartmann, both of whom were Republicans and serving as canvassers for Wayne County, Michigan.

Wayne County, which encompasses Detroit, Dearborn, Westland, and other cities, has a total population around 1.8 million, and while the state chose Joe Biden by only about 150k votes, that county alone preferred Biden by over 330k votes, voting more than 2 to 1 for him over Trump.

Preventing certification of the Wayne County votes would have disenfranchised nearly 900k voters, and given the state’s electors to Trump, effectively silencing the state’s majority.

Even throwing out a fraction of the county’s votes could have flipped the outcome. Detroit News reports:

“We’ve got to fight for our country,” said Trump on the recordings, made by a person who was present for the call with Palmer and Hartmann. “We can’t let these people take our country away from us.”

The two Republicans had initially voted to reject certification of the votes, and Trump reportedly told them they would look “terrible” if they signed certification documents after rejecting them.

McDaniel told the canvassers that they should refuse to sign and that if they wnt [sic] home that night without completing the process, attorneys would be provided for them.

Trump backed the offer up, saying he would “take care of that.”

Afterwards, Palmer admitted publicly that Trump had contacted her, but the pressure she complained of was pressure to complete her task and certify the election — not pressure from Trump, according to Bridge Michigan.

In fact, she later told the January 6th Committee that she couldn’t remember what Trump had said on that call, and wasn’t even sure if he had discussed matters relating to the election outcome, Politico reported last year.

Hartmann passed away after a battle with COVID-19 in 2021, according to the New York Times.

Trump’s spokesperson, Steven Cheung, responded with a statement about the recorded call. NBC News reports:

“All of President Trump’s actions were taken in furtherance of his duty as President of the United States to faithfully take care of the laws and ensure election integrity, including investigating the rigged and stolen 2020 Presidential Election,: Steven Cheung, a spokesman for Trump’s 2024 presidential campaign, said in a statement.


The reported audio recording of Trump’s conversation is expected to be of particular interest to Special Counsel Jack Smith in his Washington DC election interference prosecution of the former president.

Steph Bazzle covers politics and theocracy, always aiming for a world free from extremism and authoritarianism. Follow Steph on Twitter @imjustasteph.

Trump calling Michigan





https://washingtonpress.com/2023/12/22/bombshell-trump-was-recorded-pressuring-michigan-election-officials/ 




JOYCE VANCE: Let's Debunk This

 

This afternoon, the Supreme Court declined Jack Smith’s request to hear Trump’s appeal on presidential immunity, bypassing the court of appeals. Trump’s immunity motion is important because if he wins, it’s game over. The entire indictment would get dismissed if he were immune from prosecution. And while my assessment is in line with Judge Chutkan’s—she denied Trump’s motion—we don’t know for certain what the Supreme Court will do.

Logically, Trump’s motion lacks merit.

  • To grant it, the Court would have to hold that presidents are above the law. All presidents, not just Trump. Anything they do while they’re president is protected. We’ve seen that same argument rejected repeatedly in a civil context: E. Jean Carroll’s case and the civil suit over January 6 in Washington, D.C., for instance. There’s no analytical reason to believe criminal conduct is any more deserving of protection than civil violations are, once a president is out of office.

  • Trump claims that even absent total immunity for presidential conduct, the conduct he’s been charged with falls within the “outer perimeter” of a president’s duties, so he’s entitled to immunity. To credit that, the courts would have to believe that the steps Trump took to interfere with multiple states’ votes, elections a president has no role in, are somehow a part of his job. Elections are run by secretaries of state and county officials. The president has no say in the final vote count and no duties, core or outer perimeter, to interfere in those counts or the final report of the Electoral College.

  • If the Supreme Court granted Trump’s motion, what would prevent Joe Biden or any future president from doing precisely what Trump did in 2020, but with more skill—and succeeding? Nothing. The Supreme Court would have ruled they could do no wrong. And that’s why the Supreme Court has to deny Trump’s motion to dismiss the charges, unless it wants to end democracy by giving a license to the next president to do whatever it takes to stay in power.

It didn’t take long for Trump to weigh in after the Supreme Court’s decision today. He got it badly wrong. Let’s count the ways and debunk the falsehoods.

First, Trump claims the Supreme Court has “unanimously rejected Deranged Jack Smith’s desperate attempt to short circuit our Great Constitution.” Leaving the persistent errors in capitalization to the side, Smith isn’t trying to “short circuit” the Constitution—he asked for an established writ that has been used in other cases of similar magnitude to send an appeal directly to the Supreme Court. Nor has the Court unanimously rejected the underlying issue, Judge Chutkan’s denial of Trump presidential immunity motion. That substantive issue is still to be decided.

Trump then claims, “Crooked Joe Biden and his henchmen waited three years to bring this sham case.” How can such a short sentence be wrong in so many ways? There is nothing—no evidence, and four years where Trump controlled the Justice Department and presumably would have found any if it existed, to support the assertion Joe Biden is “crooked.” Nor does DOJ function as “henchmen” for President Biden. Perhaps that is what Trump would like his relationship with the Department to look like, but Jack Smith is independent and doesn’t take orders from Merrick Garland, let alone the President. And as for “waiting” three years to indict, to the contrary, from what we know, while there may have been some initial reluctance to investigate, by at least 2022, investigation was underway and the case, a very complicated one with lots of moving parts, was indicted on August 1, 2023. In other words, less than three years out from January 6, 2021.

It continues. Trump claims, “I was President, it was my right and duty to investigate, and speak on, the rigged and stolen 2020 Presidential election.” As we noted above, elections are run by states. They certify their results on the basis of the results in each county. So, Trump had no right to get involved in the vote count in Wayne County, Michigan, but we now know that he tried to cajole Republican vote canvassers there into refusing to certify the lawful vote. Just like he called Georgia’s Secretary of State and threatened he was committing a crime if he didn’t “find” Trump more votes. That’s not the president’s job. He had no more right than anyone else to interfere with state and county election officials’ tallies of their votes. If Trump suspected fraud he could report that to DOJ, which he of course did, and they told him in no uncertain terms they couldn’t find any evidence of it. So no, the election wasn’t rigged or stolen. And Trump had neither right nor duty to investigate. It’s just more red meat he throws at his base, hoping they won’t notice that it’s spoiled.

But at end, there’s something we can agree on. Trump says he’s “looking forward to the very important arguments on Presidential Immunity in front of the DC Circuit Court of Appeals.” So am I. But I expect him to lose, and then how long will it be before we hear from him about the corrupt Democrat judges on that court who are part of the witch hunt against him?

When we got its decision today, the Supreme Court did not explain why it denied Smith’s request to hear the appeal now. All we got was one sentence.


So, what does this do to Judge Chutkan’s scheduled March trial date? It probably blows it up. Although there’s a fantasy scenario that I’d like to cling to that could keep the case almost on track, it’s more likely that this spells delay, maybe significant delay. There are too many variables here for a reliable prediction about how long of one, but given that all proceedings before Judge Chutkan are stayed at least for now, delay seems inevitable.

First off, there is the timeline set by the rules of court to consider. As the Special Counsel noted in his reply brief, even if he were to win with a quick decision before the court of appeals, the default rules give Trump 45 days to seek en banc review before the full D.C. Circuit and 90 days to file for certiorari with the Supreme Court. That’s a good sized chunk of time. Although that schedule can be altered (either direction) by the courts, there’s the prospect for considerable delay.

The fantasy scenario where trial doesn’t get pushed back more than a month would have to look something like this:

  • The court of appeals moves quickly, deciding the appeal within a few days of oral argument.

  • The Supreme Court steps in immediately to hear the case—Jack Smith asked them to do this, but didn’t get a ruling in the one-liner above. It’s perhaps possible for the Court to decide to do this at a later date.

  • The Supreme Court moves quickly, with an expedited briefing schedule and a fast decision.

  • Voila, we only lose something like 60 days off the clock and trial starts in early May.

The fantasy scenario obviously depends on a lot of things going right, and it’s too early to have any sense about whether this is even a possibility. Although the court of appeals is on a fast track, we don’t know how long it will take them to issue a decision. Trump will presumably play out the time to ask for rehearing to the full extent possible. The court could, perhaps, decide a stay was no longer warranted and permit Judge Chutkan to restart her pretrial proceedings, which could incentivize Trump to move more quickly, but again, there are a lot of different considerations involved and no certainties. The most honest conclusion I can give you tonight is that we just don’t know for sure how the schedule will shape up.

One possible bright spot: There were no dissents from denial of certiorari in advance of judgment. If this decision had signaled some sort of move by a majority of the Court to prevent any of the Trump cases from going to trial before the election, we could have expected to see one or more of the liberal Justices dissent from the denial. The fact that none of them did may suggest that there isn’t dissatisfaction about the path forward and its likely speed. Or so we can hope.

More questions tonight than answers.

I plan to spend the next few days with friends and family, doing a lot of cooking and baking. I’ll jump back in if we get any additional developments, but plan to skip the usual Week Ahead edition on Sunday night. I promise that if Tofu manages to knock over the Christmas tree, you’ll get pictures! See you next week, ahead of the new year. Thanks for being a part of Civil Discourse!

We’re in this together,

Joyce



The Eye-Popping Details of Rudy Giuliani’s Bankruptcy Filing

 

POLITICS
The Eye-Popping Details of Rudy Giuliani’s Bankruptcy Filing
Trump’s former lawyer may be liable for up to $500 million in unpaid debts.
excerpt:
The man once known as “America’s mayor” has now become arguably the country’s best-known debtor. Among the debts cited in Giuliani’s filing today are legal bills going back to his role as Donald Trump’s personal lawyer, in the former president’s first impeachment, along with mounting legal fees from his involvement in Trump’s effort to use election fraud lies to steal the 2020 election. Obviously, Giuliani is unable to pay Moss and Freeman $148 million. His personal lawyer and friend, Robert Costello, is suing Giuliani for $1.4 million in unpaid legal fees. Giuliani also reports about $3.5 million in additional debts to lawyers.
Giuliani faces substantial additional expenses from his Georgia indictment for trying to interfere in the counting of votes during the 2020 election. He’s also an unindicted co-conspirator in Special Counsel Jack Smith’s prosecution of Trump for his attempts to overturn the 2020 election. Despite Trump’s assurance in August that he would help his former lawyer pay off additional legal debts, Trump’s Save America PAC only has helped Giuliani pay some $340,000 in legal expenses.
The IRS in August filed a $549,435 tax lien against Giuliani for the 2021 tax year, and his bankruptcy petition says he now owes a total of about $989,000 in unpaid taxes. He also cites “unknown potential obligations” to Dominion and Smartmatic voting machine companies who have sued him for defamation, and to Hunter Biden, who has sued Giuliani for violating his privacy by “hacking into, tampering with, manipulating, copying, disseminating, and generally obsessing over” material on Hunter’s laptop. He also cites potential obligations to Noelle Dunphy, a former employee who has sued Giuliani for “sexual assault and harassment, wage theft,” and “rape.”He denies those allegations and well as claims in other suits against him.
Giuliani’s overall liabilities? An estimated $100 million to $500 million. He says his assets total between $1 million and $10 million.
The bankruptcy proceedings will allow Giuliani to avoid paying most of what he owes. That means Freeman and Moss, though they won a symbolic victory, likely will get only a small fraction of what jurors said Giuliani owes them. The former mayor has been trying to sell his Upper East apartment in Manhattan to raise funds. He’s seeking $6.1 million.




NUCLEAR? DON'T BET ON IT!

 

NUCLEAR - Don't bet on it!
The capital industry will not fund nuclear because of its widely known cost overruns.
In the US, legislation was passed to mandate that rate payers fund nuclear.
There have been several nuclear industry scandals....
Nearly 47 years after construction began on the Bellefonte Nuclear Power Plant in Northeast Alabama, the Tennessee Valley Authority is giving up its construction permit for America's biggest unfinished nuclear plant and abandoning any plans to complete the twin-reactor facility.
In OHIO, nuclear was surrounded by bribery, corruption & a RICO trial.
Former chair of Ohio’s utility regulator indicted in nuclear bailout law scandal
Three years later: The fallout from SC's $9B nuclear fiasco continues
https://energycentral.com/.../three-years-later-fallout... FROM: Eyre Peninsula Renewable Energy Initiatives
'A Cost of building Australia's future energy needs
Source: CSIRO
A surge in the cost of small nuclear reactors has forced the national science agency to change its calculations for Australia.
The latest modelling of all energy sources, released by CSIRO on Thursday, includes data from a recently scrapped project in the US that was showcasing nuclear small modular reactors (SMRs) as a way to fight climate change.
The latest modelling of all energy sources, released by CSIRO on Thursday, includes data from a recently scrapped project in the US that was showcasing nuclear small modular reactors (SMRs) as a way to fight climate change.
The draft GenCost 2023-24 report, out for consultation over summer, shows that while inflation pressures are easing there has been a recalculation on SMRs that puts them out of reach.
Real data on a high-profile six-reactor power plant in the US has confirmed that the contentious technology costs more than any energy consumer wants to pay.
Project costs for the Utah project were estimated at $18,200 per kilowatt, but the company has since disclosed a whopping capital cost of $31,100/kW, prompting its cancellation in November.
In contrast, under existing policies the cost of new offshore wind in Australia in 2023 would be $5545/kW (fixed) and $6856/kW (floating), while rooftop solar panels are calculated at a modest $1505/kW.
The GenCost report is an annual update of the costs of electricity generation, energy storage and hydrogen production, which attempts to build in the transmission and integration costs.
As a benchmark, the final report for 2024 will guide government and investor decisions about how to meet climate pledges and create the lowest-cost electricity grid for Australians.'



The GOP just tried to kick hundreds of students off the voter rolls

    This year, MAGA GOP activists in Georgia attempted to disenfranchise hundreds of students by trying to kick them off the voter rolls. De...