Tuesday, February 2, 2021

RSN: FOCUS: AOC's Powerful Plea for Republican Accountability Cannot Be Ignored

 

Reader Supported News
02 February 21

It's Live on the HomePage Now:
Reader Supported News


FOCUS: AOC's Powerful Plea for Republican Accountability Cannot Be Ignored
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez. (photo: Brittany Greeson/Getty Images)
Moira Donegan, Guardian UK
Donegan writes: "AOC is correct in her observation that the rhetorical strategies used by Republicans - to deny their own wrongdoing, attack the victims seeking accountability, and to pretend that the true wrongdoing has been committed against them - are the same strategies deployed by other tyrants."

The congresswoman knows impunity for those who incited the Capitol attack just allows them to do the same, or worse, again

lexandria Ocasio-Cortez uses social media with a fluency that is still uncommon in politicians. She is at ease online; neither thoughtless nor noticeably self-conscious. She regularly answers questions from voters on Instagram Live while cooking dinner; she peppers her language with millennial slang. AOC is a savvy media figure, but the effects of the live broadcasts are to make her seem less like a polished public persona and more like a plausible person, someone you could imagine speaking to in real life. She is in proximity to power but does not appear to have decided that her power comes at the cost of her personality. This part of her – her humanity and frankness, her familiarity and sympathy – make her seem to achieve, on the broadcasts, something that is impossible for politicians, and especially impossible for female ones: she is in power, but she also reminds you of people you know.

On Monday night, after making several public allusions to the gravity of her experience, AOC used Instagram Live to describe her experience of the Capitol attack on 6 January. She spoke of hiding in her office as the mob breached the Capitol; she hid behind the door in a bathroom as she heard people ransacking the rooms outside. Someone came into the bathroom where she was hiding, their face on the other side of the door that she hid behind. At one point, a voice yelled, “Where is she? Where is she?” That turned out to be a Capitol police officer, but he did not identify himself; Ocasio-Cortez describes feeling ambivalent and uncertain about who he was and why he was really there.

Eventually, she escaped, and wound up barricaded in the office of Representative Katie Porter, of California, and later she moved to the office of Representative Ayanna Pressley, of Massachusetts. She spoke several times of how she feared the marauders could attack, with the intelligence she was receiving from security personnel mixing with her own anxious imagination. If she turned that corner down the hall, would an insurrectionist mob appear with guns? If bombs were found a block away, did that mean the building she was sitting in could explode? It’s clear from her account that at several points throughout the day, she thought she was going to die.

The description of these events on the broadcast – the terror and trauma AOC recounted, the frankness with which she detailed her mounting fears of bombs and guns – would already have been remarkable. But early in the broadcast, as she described her frustration over Republican calls to move on from the insurrection, she revealed something else: “I’m a survivor of sexual assault,” she said, the first time she has made that disclosure publicly. “The reason I say this and the reason I’m getting emotional in this moment is because these folks who tell us to move on, that it’s not a big deal, that we should forget what’s happened, or even telling us to apologize,” she said. “These are the tactics that abusers use.”

In recognizing the common rhetorical strategies used by both Republicans eager to minimize the attack and perpetrators of gender violence eager to avoid accountability for their treatment of women, AOC was echoing feminists who compared Donald Trump’s increasingly hostile and reckless behavior in the last two months of his term to a pattern common to domestic abusers, who are known to escalate their violence in the weeks immediately following their victim’s severing of the relationship.

The comparisons have come under fire for creating what is seen as a false equivalence, or for supposedly trivializing political instability and constitutional crises with the language of domestic strife. But to recognize a pattern is not the same thing as drawing an equivalence, and AOC is correct in her observation that the rhetorical strategies used by Republicans – to deny their own wrongdoing, attack the victims seeking accountability, and to pretend that the true wrongdoing has been committed against them – are the same strategies deployed by other tyrants, be they political or domestic, seeking to uphold other unjust and dangerous systems of power. She went on to explain that she knew she would be ridiculed and disbelieved for her revelations, and that this, too, was part of the harm that the Republicans were doing to her – denying, and minimizing her experience. The disbelief and dismissal of those who have experienced trauma, she says, is its own, additional injustice.

The revelation that she had experienced sexual assault, and that she feared for her life at the Capitol, were the most powerful and personally dangerous way that AOC has brought a female perspective to her position as one of the most visible and controversial members of Congress. And this, too, is remarkable: AOC’s willingness to describe moments in which she felt vulnerable and afraid – like when she was assaulted, or when she hid from the insurrectionary mob – even from her place of power as a politician. Perhaps the most striking thing about AOC’s broadcast was her willingness to admit that she had been frightened, that she had been hurt, without allowing the idea that this somehow undermined her claim to power.

Vulnerability and power do not often go together, and certainly not in female politicians. Sure, “Vulnerability is strength” has become the kind of kitschy post-feminist catch phrase, the kind of thing one is likely to see embroidered on a throw pillow or printed on the tag for a bag of herbal tea. But it’s not something many people actually act like they believe. Traditionally, the picture of power, and particularly of female power, has been of the forced and strictly disciplined erasure of any evidence of vulnerability; the steely stare, the emotionless resolve, the stiff chin. In admitting to fear, in admitting to vulnerability, in admitting to hiding for her life and to having been a survivor of assault, AOC demonstrated that she was unwilling to concede that female vulnerability is incompatible with the dignity of power. Refusing to separate those two was a demonstration of her feminist vision, a gesture at what an authentic kind of power might look like.

While her disclosure of sexual assault with doubtless garner much of the media attention, the real purpose of AOC’s broadcast was to call for accountability for the Republican members of Congress who incited and may have aided the Capitol attack. “Accountability is about creating safety,” she said. It was their actions that caused the trauma inflicted on her and others; their actions that had incited the violence and ultimately, indirectly, led to several deaths. “The violence needed someone to tell the lie,” AOC said, referring to the false claims, made by Trump and stoked by Republicans. “They knew that these violent people needed the lie. Because it would be advantageous to them, they chose to tell the lie.”

That lie – the malicious, opportunistic, spiteful lie that hurt her and so many others directly, and hurt the nation irreparably, could not, she argued, go unpunished. Because impunity for the people who told the lie would amount to complicity in their conduct, to a grant of permission for them to do the same thing, or worse, again.

READ MORE


Contribute to RSN

Update My Monthly Donation





RSN: Harvey Wasserman | Will a Hitlerian Impeachment Performance Ignite Trump's Paramilitary Death Squads?

 

 

Reader Supported News
02 February 21


Not An Easy Road, But a Fighting Chance

January fundraising was a struggle. On the very last day of the month we managed to just cover our expenses.

We are always torn. We have great, dedicated donors but so many who come but will not help. It’s frustrating because can see what would be possible with slightly better participation.

So a huge thank you to those who sustain RSN and a New Year’s Resolution to do better in 2021.

With sincere thanks, onward.

Marc Ash
Founder, Reader Supported News


Update My Monthly Donation


If you would prefer to send a check:
Reader Supported News
PO Box 2043
Citrus Hts, CA 95611



Reader Supported News
02 February 21

It's Live on the HomePage Now:
Reader Supported News


RSN: Harvey Wasserman | Will a Hitlerian Impeachment Performance Ignite Trump's Paramilitary Death Squads?
Armed right-wing militia members. (photo: Reuters)
Harvey Wasserman, Reader Supported News
Wasserman writes: "Lawyers galore have fled the prospect of representing Donald Trump at his upcoming Impeachment Trial (the sequel). So his pardoned consigliere Steve Bannon (who knows his Nazi history) wants The Donald to testify in person. It's a serious Hitlerian scenario."

So his pardoned consigliere Steve Bannon (who knows his Nazi history) wants The Donald to testify in person. It’s a serious Hitlerian scenario.

In 1923, Adolf tried to overthrow Bavaria’s state government. His violent rant at a Munich beerhall sparked an armed conflict that killed eight (Adolf dislocated his shoulder, then hid at a friend’s house).

His high-profile trial jump-started Hitler’s quest for fascist power.

Trump’s own “beerhall putsch” left five dead, plus two police suicides. He pledged to “be there with you” but hid like Hitler.

Trump’s paramilitary Death Squad meant to murder the likes of Mike Pence, Nancy Pelosi, AOC, Bernie Sanders. They crushed the skull of one cop and gleefully assaulted others. Many were professionally trained and heavily armed.

Trump is currently hiding in a Floridian Elba, barely seen or heard.

For his neo-Nazi cult, Trump’s return to the global spotlight would likely trigger waves of armed assault.

A brain-numbing tsunami of bloviating blather would swamp the global media. The wonky details of Biden’s bid to stop the pandemic, revive the economy, and save the planet would pale before the moronic bombast of the former Orange führer.

No matter how badly Trump comports himself in the eyes of his haters, his cultist legions will lap up every drop of insane blather. Once back in the spotlight, Donald Trump need merely open his mouth and the madness will march.

That’s what paved Hitler’s road to power. After his riveting post-putsch courtroom performance, Adolf spent eight months in a posh prison compiling his ghastly blueprint for global conquest. Mein Kampf was his very own Art of the Deal.

No matter what Trump might say at his impeachment, he’ll emerge unconvicted and unscathed. Chuck Schumer’s Senate Dems are simply too dull to compete for airtime with this media master of the Big Lie.

Mitch McConnell’s knot of GOP toadies will embrace his every addled word. They will pompously blast the loser libtards he so recently sent his minions to murder.

But even if Trump doesn’t testify, the Republican road to power is clear. Hitler built his entire career around the false narrative that Germany had actually won World War One, only to have that sacred victory stolen by traitors and Jews.

Trump will forever bleat how he really won two presidential landslides. The traitorous back-stabbers who denied his 2020 dictatorship are not only the liberal Democrats … but also Pence’s fake Republicans, who certified those fake electoral votes even as Trump’s Christian soldiers came so close to killing him.

The GOP blitzkrieg against any future fair election is already underway. That so many citizens who were young and of color could cast hand-marked paper ballots and have them counted was the core of Trump’s defeat. Should it happen again, he says, no Republican will ever win another election.

So gerrymandered GOP state legislators in Wisconsin, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Georgia, Florida, Texas, and Arizona want it made clear that only the reliably rich and the white may register to vote, get a ballot, return a ballot, or have one reliably counted.

And after gerrymandering the districting maps to their permanent advantage during the infamous 2010 REDMAP Coup, the ultimate GOP vision is that only a Red US House and super-majority GOP state legislatures may continue to exist.

(The Democrats’ parallel vision is to lock down their own safe districts, preventing progressives like Bernie Sanders or AOC from ever winning a presidential primary.)

With 6-3 control of the US Supreme Court, Trump’s GOP is positioned to win bans on paper balloting and competitive representational districts while protecting the Electoral College and the power of Big Money.

Trump’s January 6 Capitol killers’ costumes advertised RWDS (“Right Wing Death Squad”) along with“Camp Auschwitz” and 6MWE (“6 Million Weren’t Enough”). They laud Pinochet’s Chile and Putin’s Russia … and want them here.

But grassroots campaigns have won epic victories for paper ballots and against gerrymandering in places like Iowa, California, and Michigan.

Diverse turnouts shifted the US Senate in places like Georgia.

About half the states have the initiative and referendum and could win Constitutional amendments that could well hold up in the long term.

Democracy advocates must now learn how to protect free and fair elections while facing an armed fascist cult that hates them.

However it happens, the impeachment circus will be bigly ugly.

But it’ll be a fleeting prelude to the Great Democracy War of the 2020s, which we must win.



Harvey Wasserman’s People’s Spiral of US History is at www.solartopia.org. He co-convenes the Grassroots Emergency Election Protection Coalition’s Monday 5 p.m. EST zooms via www.electionprotection2024.org.

Reader Supported News is the Publication of Origin for this work. Permission to republish is freely granted with credit and a link back to Reader Supported News.

READ MORE


House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Senate Democratic leader Chuck Schumer. (photo: AP)
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Senate Democratic leader Chuck Schumer. (photo: AP)


Democrats Introduce Budget Resolution, Kicking Off Fast-Track Process to Pass COVID Package
Melissa Quinn and Jack Turman, CBS News
Excerpt: "Democratic leaders in Congress filed a joint budget resolution Monday that kicks off the process for passing President Biden's sweeping coronavirus relief plan without Republican support."

emocratic leaders in Congress filed a joint budget resolution Monday that kicks off the process for passing President Biden's sweeping coronavirus relief plan without Republican support, announcing the measure just before a group of 10 Republican senators are set to meet with the president at the White House about their own framework.

The budget resolution filed by House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer is the first step in the budget reconciliation process, which would allow Congress to swiftly approve Mr. Biden's $1.9 trillion coronavirus package with a simple majority. The resolution contains reconciliation instructions that lay out which congressional committees are responsible for drafting the legislation and how much they can spend. Once both the House and Senate pass the resolutions, the committees can get to work on the reconciliation bill.

"Congress has a responsibility to quickly deliver immediate comprehensive relief to the American people hurting from COVID-19," Schumer and Pelosi said in a statement. "The cost of inaction is high and growing, and the time for decisive action is now."

The instructions direct the relevant House and Senate panels to come up with language that addresses several of the key provisions in Mr. Biden's plan, including $1,400 direct payments to individuals and an extension of the unemployment insurance program through September with a $400 per week enhancement. The legislation would also include $350 billion for state and local governments, funding to reopen schools and more money for vaccines, testing and public health programs. The budget resolution calls for federal aid to support the use of the Defense Production Act to boost manufacturing of supplies needed to combat the coronavirus, as well as money for small businesses.

Absent from a summary provided by the Democrats is a provision raising the federal minimum wage to $15 an hour, which was in Mr. Biden's package but criticized by Republicans.

"The only thing we cannot accept is a package that is too small or too narrow to pull our country out of this emergency," Schumer said in remarks on the Senate floor. "We cannot repeat the mistake of 2009, and we must act very soon to get this assistance to those so desperately in need."

The New York Democrat said input from Republicans is "welcome."

"COVID relief, too, should be the work of both Democrats and Republicans," Schumer said.

Approval of an emergency relief plan is Mr. Biden's first legislative priority, as the coronavirus pandemic continues to wreak havoc on the U.S. economy. While the president has stressed he wants bipartisan support for a coronavirus package, Republican senators have balked at the $1.9 trillion cost of Mr. Biden's plan.

On Sunday, a group of 10 Republicans sent the president a letter asking to meet and discuss their own framework, which they said would have backing from both Democrats and Republicans. At $618 billion, the plan is significantly smaller than Mr. Biden's and does not include money for state and local governments, which has been a sticking point in past negotiations on relief measures.

Nine of the Republicans met with Mr. Biden for two hours on Monday. Senator Susan Collins, the leader of the group, called the meeting "productive," saying she believed there was still hope for a bipartisan deal.

The White House, however, said in a readout of the meeting that Mr. Biden "will not settle for a package that fails to meet the moment."

READ MORE


Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez disclosed the sexual assault as she recounted her experiences during the U.S. Capitol riot. (photo: Pete Marovich/NYT)
Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez disclosed the sexual assault as she recounted her experiences during the U.S. Capitol riot. (photo: Pete Marovich/NYT)


AOC Reveals She Is a Sexual Assault Survivor in Recount of Capitol Attack
Guardian UK
Excerpt: "The Democratic congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez on Monday spoke in an emotional video about the insurrection at the US Capitol, and how what she went through was affected by her experience as a survivor of sexual assault."

In an account remarkably candid for an American lawmaker, Ocasio-Cortez recounted going into hiding as rioters scaled the Capitol on 6 January, hiding in a bathroom in her office while hearing banging on the walls and a man yelling: “Where is she? Where is she?” She had feared for her life, she told an Instagram Live audience of more than 150,000 people.

“I thought I was going to die,” she said. “And I had a lot of thoughts. I was thinking if this is the plan for me, then people will be able to take it from here.”

In the video, Ocasio-Cortez expressed frustration at being asked to “move on” after the attack, likening it to the refrain heard by many survivors of sexual assault. “These folks like to tell us to move on, that it’s not a big deal, that we should forget what happened, even telling us that we should apologize – these are the same tactics of abusers,” Ocasio-Cortez said.

“I’m a survivor of sexual assault,” she added. “And I haven’t told many people that in my life. But when we go through trauma, trauma compounds on each other.”

Ocasio-Cortez, who won re-election in November in New York’s 14th congressional district, had said in a video last month that she feared for her life during the Capitol attack.

On Monday, she said she had been worried about the security situation for days, having been cautioned about possible violence by several people, including other lawmakers.

The incident at her office had occurred after she returned from receiving her Covid-19 vaccine, she said.

“I immediately realized I shouldn’t have gone into the bathroom. I should have gone in the closet,” she said. “Then I hear whoever was trying to get inside got into my office. I realize it’s too late.”

She said she had then heard yelling. “This was the moment I thought everything was over. I thought I was going to die.”

The congresswoman wiped away tears as she continued. “I start to look through the door hinge to see if I can see anything. I see this white man in a black beanie and yell again,” she said. “I have never been quieter in my entire life.”

A staffer had eventually told her it was safe to emerge from the bathroom where she was hiding, and a Capitol police officer had been present in her office. She and her team had left the office, she recalled, and had eventually found shelter in the offices of the California representative Katie Porter.

Ocasio-Cortez, who is Latina, had previously said that her fears were heightened because there were white supremacists and other extremists taking part in the mostly white mob.

The second-term representative, whose New York district covers part of Queens and the Bronx, is among the most high-profile elected officials on the political left and a lightning rod for the right and extreme right.

She has strongly condemned Donald Trump for inciting the riots, as well as members of his administration who did not invoke the 25th amendment to remove him from office, and lawmakers who voted to overturn the election results.


READ MORE


Pedestrians duck under a downed power line in Santa Isabel, Puerto Rico. (photo: Angel Valentin/Vox)
Pedestrians duck under a downed power line in Santa Isabel, Puerto Rico. (photo: Angel Valentin/Vox)


Biden Administration Moves to Release Billions in Maria Relief for Puerto Rico
Alex Roarty and Syra Ortiz-Blanes, McClatchy DC
Excerpt: "The Biden administration approved releasing $1.3 billion in funding for Puerto Rico Monday as part of a Hurricane Maria disaster relief package."

he Biden administration approved releasing $1.3 billion in funding for Puerto Rico Monday as part of a Hurricane Maria disaster relief package, a federal official confirmed to El Nuevo Herald and the Miami Herald, the first such distribution from a new president who has promised to speed delivery of the long-delayed funds.

Department of Housing and Urban Development spokesman Michael Burns also said the department took a step Monday toward loosening restrictions on $4.9 billion in relief funds previously approved by the former President Donald Trump’s administration in the hours before he left office.

According to January 2020 data, HUD has only disbursed around $138.5 million, less than 1% of the roughly $20 billion Congress allocated for Hurricane María relief through its programs, according to figures from the Central Office of Recovery, Reconstruction and Resiliency (COR3,) which oversees federally funded reconstruction projects in Puerto Rico.

The Trump administration delayed and placed restrictions on funds allocated for the American territory to help the island recover from the devastation of Hurricane Maria, partly citing concerns of government mishandling of funds and corruption. The hurricane killed thousands and devastated critical infrastructure, causing as much as $90 billion in damages.

As the island struggles to bounce back from the aftermath of María, it has also dealt with thousands of earthquakes and the coronavirus pandemic.

Earlier Monday, White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki said it was a “priority” of the president to release the outstanding relief funds for Puerto Rico.

“We are working to do so,” she told reporters during a press briefing.

Of the roughly $66 billion in total aid Congress approved for Puerto Rico after the 2017 storm, only about $17.3 billion — less than a third of the total amount — has been distributed to the American territory. Federal agencies have promised to distribute around $41.7 billion, per COR3 data.

READ MORE


Images and videos of the riot show individuals associated with a range of extreme and far-right groups and supporters of fringe online conspiracy theories. (photo: Getty Images)
Images and videos of the riot show individuals associated with a range of extreme and far-right groups and supporters of fringe online conspiracy theories. (photo: Getty Images)


'He Invited Us': Accused Capitol Rioters Blame Trump in Novel Legal Defense
Jan Wolfe, Reuters
Wolfe writes: "Emanuel Jackson, awaiting trial in federal court on assault charges, is now adopting a novel legal defense: seeking to pin the blame on Donald Trump, citing the former president's remarks at a 'Stop the Steal' rally shortly before the Capitol siege."

manuel Jackson, a 20-year-old Washington area man, was caught on video using a metal bat to strike the protective shields wielded by police officers as they tried to fend off rioters storming the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6.

Trump told the crowd to “fight like hell,” said “we will not take it anymore” and repeated his false claims that the election was stolen from him through widespread voting fraud. Trump exhorted his followers to go to the Capitol. The ensuing rampage interrupted the congressional certification of President Joe Biden’s election victory, sent lawmakers into hiding and left five people dead including a police officer.

Jackson’s lawyer, Brandi Harden, wrote in a Jan. 22 court filing that “the nature and circumstances of this offense must be viewed through the lens of an event inspired by the President of the United States.”

The Capitol siege, Harden added, “appears to have been spontaneous and sparked by the statements made during the ‘Stop the Steal’ rally.” Harden argued that Jackson should be released while awaiting trial. A judge on Jan. 22 denied the request.

At least six of the 170 people charged in connection with the Capitol siege have tried to shift at least some of the blame onto Trump as they defend themselves in court or in the court of public opinion.

Other defendants to take this route include Jacob Chansley, who donned a horned headdress and face paint during the attack, and Dominic Pezzola, a member of the Proud Boys right-wing extremist group who is accused of shattering a window in the Capitol with a stolen police shield so rioters could enter.

“The boss of the country said, ‘People of the country, come on down, let people know what you think,’” Pezzola’s defense lawyer, Michael Scibetta, told Reuters. “The logical thinking was, ‘He invited us down.’”

Lawyers have not yet sought dismissal of charges or acquittal during a trial based on the idea that Trump incited their clients, instead making the claim as part of efforts to spare them from pretrial detention.

No defendant will be able to avoid criminal culpability by saying they were incited by Trump, said Jay Town, who served as the top federal prosecutor in Birmingham, Alabama, during the Trump administration.

“If anything, it is an admission to criminal conduct,” said Town, now the general counsel of cybersecurity firm Gray Analytics. “While this ineffective tactic may help with headlines, it will not help the fate of any defendant.”

Trump took to a stage near the White House and exhorted supporters to “fight” - using the word more than 20 times. Trump told the crowd that “everyone here will soon be marching over to the Capitol.” About 50 minutes into the speech, many of them did.

Trump adviser Jason Miller did not immediately respond to a request for comment on the legal strategy of blaming the former president. Trump has called his speech “totally appropriate.”

IMPEACHMENT TRIAL

The Democratic-led House of Representatives voted to impeach Trump on a charge of “incitement of insurrection” stemming from his Jan. 6 speech. He faces an impeachment trial next week in the Senate.

Enough of his fellow Republicans in the Senate have signaled opposition to impeachment to indicate that the chamber almost certainly will fall short of the two-thirds majority needed to convict him. Democrats hope to use the trial to disqualify him from future public office.

Lori Ulrich, a defense lawyer in Pennsylvania, said that her client Riley June Williams was motivated by Trump’s remarks. Williams, 22, is accused of stealing a laptop from House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s office during the siege.

It is “regrettable that Ms. Williams took the president’s bait and went inside the Capitol,” Ulrich told a judge at a Jan. 21 court hearing as she argued against Williams being detained while her case proceeds. The judge released Williams to home confinement.

Some legal experts said the “blame Trump” defense could complicate matters for defendants if they eventually plead guilty in hopes of getting a lesser sentence. Town noted that federal judges require defendants who plead guilty to accept full responsibility for their conduct.

Scibetta acknowledged the limits of the effectiveness of blaming Trump.

“It would be reckless to put all your eggs in that basket,” Scibetta said.

But Scibetta said Trump’s speech helps explain how people got swept away in the riot.

“These were people acting in a way they have never acted before,” Scibetta said, “and it begs the question, ‘Who lit the fuse?”

READ MORE


A protest against the jailing of opposition leader Alexei Navalny in Russia. (photo: AP)
A protest against the jailing of opposition leader Alexei Navalny in Russia. (photo: AP)

ALSO SEE: Severe Punishment Awaits Protesters in Russia, Kremlin Says


More Protests Called in Moscow to Demand Navalny's Release
Daria Litvinova, Associated Press
Litvinova writes: "Moscow braced for more protests seeking the release of jailed opposition leader Alexei Navalny, who faces a court hearing Tuesday after two weekends of nationwide rallies and thousands of arrests in the largest outpouring of discontent in Russia in years."
READ MORE



Activists protest the Dakota Access Pipeline outside the Army Corps of Engineers Office. (photo: Alex Wong/Getty Images)
Activists protest the Dakota Access Pipeline outside the Army Corps of Engineers Office. (photo: Alex Wong/Getty Images)


Once United in Support of Biden, Environmentalists and Unions Clash Over Pipelines
Laura Sanicola and Nia Williams, Reuters
Excerpt: "Environmentalists and labor unions that threw their support behind U.S. President Joseph Biden now find themselves on the opposite sides of a battle over the construction of big pipeline projects between Canada and the United States."

The United States is the world’s largest producer of oil and gas. Biden’s administration aims to transition the U.S. economy towards net-zero carbon emissions by 2050, and his initial moves towards that goal included cancelling a permit for the Keystone XL crude oil pipeline (KXL) and reducing oil-and-gas leasing.

The reaction from Biden’s supporters, however, illustrates the challenge of managing the impact of the energy transition on different communities.

While climate activists celebrated KXL’s demise, labor unions, reeling from the global oil downturn, have mobilized to keep ongoing projects from being derailed.

Mike Knisely, secretary and treasurer of the Ohio State Building and Construction Trades Council, which endorsed Biden, said he has been leaning on state officials to talk to the president about how his rapid-fire climate announcements are affecting his union membership’s support.

“I tell them they need to get back with Biden and ask if this all really has to happen on Day Two of the new administration,” Knisely said. “I just get so frustrated that there’s almost no common ground (on pipelines) with the environmental community.”

Climate groups have had successes in recent years, persuading large investors to reduce holdings in fossil fuel industries, as well as lobbying banks to shun investment in Arctic drilling.

But Biden was endorsed by a number of key labor unions that work on pipelines, refineries and other energy installations, including the International Teamsters and North America’s Building Trades. Those unions celebrated the victory of a pro-labor president, but opposed the Keystone move, and are lining up against threats to the other pipelines.

Environmentalists see Biden as an ally in the battle to wean the United States off fossil fuels and stymie imports of carbon-intensive heavy crude from Canada’s vast oil sands. They are intensifying efforts to shut three other pipelines: Enbridge Inc’s Line 3 and Line 5, and Energy Transfer’s Dakota Access Pipeline (DAPL).

Unlike KXL, these three lines are all currently in service. The Enbridge lines deliver crude oil and fuels from Canada, while DAPL sends crude from North Dakota to the Midwest and Gulf Coast.

Legal and regulatory battles threaten all three pipelines.

A White House spokesman said the Biden administration is reviewing a court decision last week that upheld orders for a lengthy environmental review for DAPL. He declined to comment on the two Enbridge pipelines.

Enbridge is more than doubling Line 3’s capacity to 760,000 barrels per day (bpd), a project supported by Minnesota’s Governor Tim Walz, a Democrat.

To be sure, not all unions backed Biden. Phillip Wallace, business representative for Pipeliners Union 798 in Minnesota, said his union, which supported former President Donald Trump, was concerned the new administration may try to stop the project.

“We have got full construction going right now in Minnesota and I am worried that this new administration could throw a monkey wrench in our gears,” Wallace said. His union is planning on rallies to support construction once COVID-19 restrictions ease.

On Friday, environmental protesters halted construction on a Line 3 work site in Minnesota by locking themselves to each other between barrels of concrete, one of several disruptions so far this year that has resulted in dozens of arrests.

“If KXL can’t pass the climate test for Biden, Line 3 certainly can’t,” said Winona LaDuke, executive director of Honor the Earth, an indigenous environmental group.

Unions are also ramping up support for Enbridge’s Line 5 pipeline, which runs under the Straits of Mackinac, where Lakes Huron and Michigan meet, and ships 540,000 bpd of light crude and propane. Activists want to decommission the 68-year-old line, while Enbridge is trying to upgrade it to protect the straits.

Enbridge last week received a state permit to build a tunnel to house the line; it still needs permission from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.

In November, Michigan Governor Gretchen Whitmer revoked the pipeline’s easement in the straits and ordered the pipeline shut. The United Steelworkers, who endorsed Biden, have been trying to drum up support with legislators to keep the line running.

“The USW strongly supports both the Line 5 replacement segment project and the continued operation of the existing pipeline,” it told Reuters in a statement. “Hundreds of USW members and their communities depend on the good, family-sustaining jobs Line 5 supports.”

READ MORE


Contribute to RSN

Update My Monthly Donation





America’s billionaires could pay for most of Biden’s coronavirus response plan with just their pandemic profits

 





This is rich: America’s billionaires have earned enough money during the pandemic to pay for all of the working family relief in President Joe Biden’s coronavirus response plan.

That’s according to the latest analysis by the Americans for Tax Fairness and the Institute for Policy Studies, which drew on Forbes data to determine that the nation’s 660 billionaires saw their fortunes balloon by a collective $1.1 trillion over the past 10 months.

That windfall covers more than half of Biden’s proposed $1.9 trillion coronavirus relief package, which some Republican lawmakers are calling too expensive as Congress works to negotiate a deal. But it’s enough to fully fund the proposed $1,400 in direct payments to individuals, $400-a-week supplements to unemployment benefits and the expanded child tax credit contained in the relief for working families included in Biden’s stimulus plan, the new report claims.

In fact, the analysis argues that the collective $1.1 trillion gain in wealth that these billionaires have enjoyed since March 18, 2020 could pay out a $3,400 stimulus check for every one of the roughly 331 million people in the United States, or more than $13,000 for a family of four.

The report names a number of tech CEOs in particular, including Amazon’s AMZN, 1.40%  Jeff Bezos, Tesla’s TSLA, 4.68%  Elon Musk and Facebook’s FB, 2.42%  Mark Zuckerberg, for enjoying “astonishing increases” in wealth since March 18, 2020 — the date when most federal and state economic restrictions were put in place to prevent the spread of COVID-19, marking the unofficial start to the pandemic in the U.S. That’s also the date when Forbes released its annual billionaires report for 2020, providing a baseline for financial gain over the subsequent months. So on March 18, 2020, the collective net worth of the billionaires in the U.S. was just under $3 trillion dollars; it rose almost 40% to hit $4.1 trillion by Jan. 18, 2021.

Musk’s meteoric rise briefly made him the world’s richest person earlier this month. A year ago, Musk was worth about $27 billion, and barely cracked Bloomberg’s list of the 50 richest people. But Tesla saw its shares spike more than 700% last year, and the company joined the S&P 500 in December following five quarters of positive earnings.


LINK




57 House Dems Call On Biden to Prevent Israeli Assault on Rafah

  57 House Dems Call On Biden to Prevent Israeli Assault on Rafah "An offensive invasion into Rafah by Israel in the upcoming days is w...