Showing posts with label #METOO. Show all posts
Showing posts with label #METOO. Show all posts

Saturday, April 29, 2023

FOCUS: Elizabeth Bruenig | Why Won't Powerful Men Learn?

 

 

Reader Supported News
29 April 23

Live on the homepage now!
Reader Supported News

IF YOU CAN DONATE, WE REALLY NEED YOU NOW: We know that not everyone can donate, but if you can we need you now. Many of you are quite well aware of what we do and how hard it is to do it the way we do it. Get behind us, the time is now. Thanks to all.
Marc Ash • Founder, Reader Supported News

Sure, I'll make a donation!

 


FOCUS: Elizabeth Bruenig | Why Won't Powerful Men Learn?
Elizabeth Bruenig, The Atlantic
Bruenig writes: "It was a black Monday for media titans: Tucker Carlson split from Fox amid allegations from a former producer, Abby Grossberg, that the set of Tucker Carlson Tonight was a hostile workplace for women; Don Lemon was fired by CNN just weeks after declaring that the Republican primary candidate Nikki Haley was out of her 'prime' at age 51."    



No law and no regulation yet has been ambitious enough to solve the problem of rich and unaccountable men.

It was a black Monday for media titans: Tucker Carlson split from Fox amid allegations from a former producer, Abby Grossberg, that the set of Tucker Carlson Tonight was a hostile workplace for women; Don Lemon was fired by CNN just weeks after declaring that the Republican primary candidate Nikki Haley was out of her “prime” at age 51; and Jeff Shell, the CEO of NBC Universal, was ousted because of what he characterized as an “inappropriate relationship with a woman in the company” and what Hadley Gamble, the woman in question, described as sexual harassment in a complaint filed with NBC prior to Shell’s dismissal. The housecleaning may not have been entirely prompted by matters related to women and sex, but the overall effect was nevertheless redolent of the high #MeToo era, when consequences for offenders first began to materialize.

Nevertheless, a cynical observer might ask why, years after the advent of the #MeToo movement and the collapse of so many illustrious careers on ignoble grounds—even in this same industry—incidents like these keep revealing darkly retro workplace cultures. Is it bona fide #MeToo backlash, as commentators have worried in recent months, or a failure, as one friend worriedly confided in me on Monday, of the movement to radically transform that much at all? Neither, I would say: #MeToo is, and always has been, a power struggle; in many places throughout this industry and many others, it isn’t yet won. But episodes like these—daunting as their revelations are—nevertheless suggest that progress is still being made.

It’s worth conceiving of #MeToo as a struggle for power because this frame places appropriate emphasis on who is actually in control of workplace cultures and environments, versus a more limited view that imagines #MeToo as a collection of many different conflicts between many different individuals. Each of these instances matter—the personalities and experiences matter—but the systems of corporate hierarchy that allow high-ranking company players to victimize other employees are much more crucial to ongoing workplace toxicity than any one individual, or even all of the individuals combined. The pioneers of the #MeToo movement found their greatest success in looking beyond their immediate resources for justice—in going outside the systems that had disempowered them—to vindicate their rights.

For Harvey Weinstein’s victims, that meant taking their stories out of Hollywood and into the court of public opinion—and then the courts proper, as Weinstein was criminally prosecuted and convicted. For one of Roger Ailes’s many targets at Fox News, Gretchen Carlson, it meant escaping the forced-arbitration scheme that had kept Ailes’s egregious sexual harassment a networkwide secret by filing a lawsuit in open court, which Fox later settled. In each of these cases, the right to a better workplace was fought for and won through an exercise of greater power—typically in the courts, and often in full public view.

And those victories did come with lasting endowments. Last year, the Pew Research Center found that most Americans feel that #MeToo has made accountability for workplace sex discrimination likelier; when so much of a victim’s outcry is calculated on the likelihood of a favorable outcome, that kind of terrain-changing win is precious. And then there were the people all over the country who, inspired by the movement, organized under its auspices to take power: According to researchers at Georgetown University and the University of Oregon, “between 2017 and 2021, states introduced 2,324 #MeToo-related bills and passed 286.” There was less activity on the federal level, with the exception of the Ending Forced Arbitration of Sexual Assault and Sexual Harrassment Act and the Speak Out Act, both championed by Gretchen Carlson and signed by President Joe Biden (the former bill guarantees that a victim of sexual harassment or abuse can seek relief in court rather than through a secret arbitration process; the latter limits the use of nondisclosure agreements and nondisparagement clauses to silence victims).

I was at the House Judiciary Committee’s hearing on November 16, 2021, the day that several women testified about their experiences with sexual harassment and forced arbitration in support of the then-pending Ending Forced Arbitration Act. I had the sense that something momentous was happening for American workers. An employer’s ability to trap an employee in a private court of their choosing with a mere contractual clause is—and was even more so, before the bill became law—a ready aid to exploitation. The women who testified that day all said as much, under oath and on the record. The result of the bill is that employees who are sexually harassed now have access to that much more power.

But the #MeToo tale has continued long after the initial success: No law and no regulation yet has been ambitious enough to solve the problem of rich and unaccountable men. Instead the struggle to work and to live like dignified people in a civilized society has been won by smaller shifts in power in lesser victories that are still being decided, even now.



READ MORE

 

Contribute to RSN

Follow us on facebook and twitter!

Update My Monthly Donation

PO Box 2043 / Citrus Heights, CA 95611





Sunday, April 19, 2020

RSN: FOCUS: Jessica Valenti | I Can't Believe I Have to Vote for Joe Biden







Reader Supported News
18 April 20



Bad enough to allow your privacy to bought and sold on Wall Street?

Bad enough to be led to vote for policies that subvert social justice?

Bad enough to empower individuals and interests who profit from human suffering on an immense scale?

Notice the difference at Reader Supported News?

Help us pay the bills. It’s not so much.

Marc Ash
Founder, Reader Supported News







If you would prefer to send a check:
Reader Supported News
PO Box 2043
Citrus Hts, CA 95611






Reader Supported News
18 April 20

It's Live on the HomePage Now:
Reader Supported News





FOCUS: Jessica Valenti | I Can't Believe I Have to Vote for Joe Biden
Joe Biden. (photo: Frank Franklin II/AP)
Jessica Valenti, Medium
Valenti writes: "On election night in 2016, my six-year-old daughter and I wore matching 'feminist' T-shirts, ordered a pizza, and sat glued in front of the television with my mother. Assuming three generations of women were about to watch the first female president be elected, I bought a bottle of champagne. (It's still sitting in a dusty corner of my bar.)"


This November, there won’t be buzzy excitement or matching T-shirts with my daughter. On election day, my choice will be between Donald Trump, a dangerous bigot who has been credibly accused of rape, sexual assault, and harassment by more than two dozen women over a more than four-decade period, and Joe Biden, a man recently accused of sexually assaulting a Senate aide in the 1990s, and who has made fun of the women who complained about his penchant for unwanted shoulder rubs.
Biden is the better choice by a mile, and I’ll do what’s right for the country and vote for him. But I’m still furious: I can’t believe that when faced with the most dangerous president of our lifetime, Democrats are moving ahead with a nearly 80-year-old moderate who has shown himself time and again not up for the fight. I am livid that Democratic women will be called on, once again, to cast our vote in the name of reducing harm to the country rather than moving it forward.
Most of all, I’m angry that people who want Trump out are expected to just vote without airing our concerns about the man who stands between him and another four years. I understand the deep worry so many Democrats share about fighting Trump with anything less than full-throated enthusiasm for our candidate. The consequences of losing another election — more far-right Supreme Court justices appointed, more children separated from their parents at the border, more hate crimes, and more lives and jobs lost amid this mismanaged pandemic — are real and terrifying. But the idea that we can no longer speak the truth aloud for fear of losing is a dangerous one.
And the truth is that this election is going to be terrible for women, no matter what we do. Feminists have long warned about Biden’s treatment of Anita Hill (along with his decades-late non-apology), his nastiness toward women he doesn’t find sufficiently deferential and sweet, and the former vice president’s trademark handsiness — but we’re still going to see these new allegations weaponized against us should we vote for him.
The cultural progress of #MeToo will be sidelined by Democrats in favor of the goal of unseating Trump.
Democratic women know that another four years of Trump will mean disaster for our country. But over the next few months, we will watch as men on the left and right who have never cared about sexual assault, harassment, or gender equality tar and feather women who are terrified of losing their fundamental human rights — and possibly even their democracy — as hypocrites for supporting Biden. (Pro tip: If the only time you have spoken out against our country’s culture of sexual violence is to play some sort of perverse “gotcha” game with Democratic women, you do not actually care about this issue.)
At the same time, those of us who dare to question Biden’s feminist bonafides or who believe his accuser will be called Trump enablers. As if saying anything negative about Biden, no matter how important, means we are somehow less serious about beating Trump in November.
No matter what we do, women stand to lose. The cultural progress of #MeToo will be sidelined by Democrats in favor of the goal of unseating Trump. Meanwhile Republicans will continue to ignore Trump’s misogyny and long history of sexual predation while casting themselves as pro-woman and mocking “creepy uncle Joe.” Those on the left will be left insisting that Biden’s behavior has not been nearly as bad as that of the president.
Even if that’s true — that the current allegations against Biden pale in comparison to the many against our president — I can’t fucking believe that this is what it’s come to. After a primary season that featured more strong female presidential candidates than ever in history, women will get a general election season of watching sexual assault used as a political cudgel by those who don’t actually care about women at all. It’s all a farce, and I’m exhausted by it already. (Especially when I think about how easily this could have been avoided by nominating Elizabeth Warren.)
However perilous this moment is, we need to do the right thing: We cannot continue one of the most powerful movements against sexual harassment and assault by playing down sexism within our own party. We can beat Trump while still being honest about who Biden is. It’s what we have to do.
So like a lot of American women, if I pop any corks on election night, it won’t be because Joe Biden won — but because Donald Trump lost. I can live with that. But I won’t forget that Democrats put American women in this position. And I won’t ever forgive it.
















Tuesday, February 25, 2020

Paul Krugman | Bernie Sanders Isn't the Left's Trump




Reader Supported News
25 February 20

You are here. We love that you are. Stop and Donate. This site is news funded by the Readers, it’s what we do.
With you.
Marc Ash
Founder, Reader Supported News



If you would prefer to send a check:
Reader Supported News
PO Box 2043
Citrus Hts
CA 95611






Reader Supported News
24 February 20

It's Live on the HomePage Now:
Reader Supported News





Paul Krugman | Bernie Sanders Isn't the Left's Trump
Paul Krugman. (photo: MasterClass)
Paul Krugman, The New York Times
Krugman writes: "Look, I know the primaries aren't over, and it's still possible that Democratic centrists will get their act together. But Bernie Sanders is now the clear favorite for the Democratic nomination."
READ MORE


Harvey Weinstein being led away in handcuffs in May 2018, after he turned himself in on charges of rape and criminal sexual act. (photo: Todd Heisler/NYT)
Harvey Weinstein being led away in handcuffs in May 2018, after he turned himself in on charges of rape and criminal sexual act. (photo: Todd Heisler/NYT)


Weinstein Has Been Convicted. But That Won't Put an End to #MeToo.
Suzanne B. Goldberg, The Washington Post
Goldberg writes: "In the swirl surrounding Harvey Weinstein's mixed conviction and acquittal on rape and related charges, it can be easy to overlook what hasn't changed in the wake of #MeToo."
READ MORE


Bernie Sanders. (photo: Getty Images)
Bernie Sanders. (photo: Getty Images)


Sanders Unveils Plan for Government-Funded Child Care, Pre-K
Rebecca Klar, The Hill
Klar writes: "Sen. Bernie Sanders is proposing a government-funded universal child care and pre-K program that he said would be financed by his proposed wealth tax, his presidential campaign announced on Monday."
READ MORE


WikiLeaks' founder Julian Assange leaves Westminster magistrates court in London after a previous hearing last month. (photo: Simon Dawson/Reuters)
WikiLeaks' founder Julian Assange leaves Westminster magistrates court in London after a previous hearing last month. (photo: Simon Dawson/Reuters)


Assange's Trial for US Extradition Begins in London
teleSUR
Excerpt: "The first day of WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange's legal battle to prevent his extradition to the United States began on Monday amid strong social protests in support of the Australian journalist."
READ MORE


Katherine G. Johnson. (photo: Jordan Strauss/AP)
Katherine G. Johnson. (photo: Jordan Strauss/AP)


Katherine G. Johnson, the Groundbreaking NASA Mathematician Featured in Hidden Figures, Has Died at 101
Britni Danielle, The Root
Danielle writes: "Katherine G. Johnson, the NASA mathematician who played a key role in helping America win the space race and whose story was featured in the 2016 film Hidden Figures, died Monday. She was 101 years old."
READ MORE


Workers spray disinfectant at the National Assembly in Seoul after it was discovered that a person who took part in a discussion session on 19 February at the Assembly has tested positive for the novel coronavirus. Parliament said that disinfection will be carried out in stages until 26 February. (photo: Yonhap/EPA-EFE/REX/Shutterstock)
Workers spray disinfectant at the National Assembly in Seoul after it was discovered that a person who took part in a discussion session on 19 February at the Assembly has tested positive for the novel coronavirus. Parliament said that disinfection will be carried out in stages until 26 February. (photo: Yonhap/EPA-EFE/REX/Shutterstock)


US and Global Markets Plunge as Coronavirus Cases Spike Outside China
Rachel Siegel and Thomas Heath, The Washington Post
Excerpt: "The Dow plunged more than 1,000 points and global markets reeled as coronavirus cases spiked outside China, intensifying fears that the outbreak was barreling toward a pandemic, with devastating and potentially lasting consequences for the world's economy."
READ MORE


A pronghorn in Yellowstone national park, Wyoming. (photo: VW Pics/Universal Images Group/Getty Images)
A pronghorn in Yellowstone national park, Wyoming. (photo: VW Pics/Universal Images Group/Getty Images)


'They Won't Survive': Trump Gas Wells Would Block Pronghorn Migration Route
Cassidy Randall, Guardian UK
Randall writes: "The Path of the Pronghorn is a 170-mile migration route that the antelope-like creatures have traveled annually for 6,000 years. It is one of North America's last remaining long-distance terrestrial migration corridors."
READ MORE





















Trump’s Senate Pick Is Losing. Look Who’s Paying For Him.

       LOTS OF POSTS IGNORED BY BLOGGER..... OR REMOVED ON THEIR WHIM! ALL POSTS ARE AVAILABLE ON MIDDLEBORO REVIEW AND SO ON BLOGGER DOESN...