Showing posts with label ALL RISE NEWS. Show all posts
Showing posts with label ALL RISE NEWS. Show all posts

Monday, April 6, 2026

Trump Lawyer NEXT AT DOJ?!?!

                                                                                                                                   

 LOTS OF POSTS IGNORED BY BLOGGER.....

OR REMOVED ON THEIR WHIM!

ALL POSTS ARE AVAILABLE ON

MIDDLEBORO REVIEW AND SO ON 

BLOGGER DOESN'T LIKE TRUTH OR FACTS!

BLOGGER DOESN'T LIKE FUND RAISERS AND DELETES 

POSTS THAT INCLUDE FUNDRAISING THAT 'VIOLATES THEIR 

UNDEFINED COMMUNITY STANDARDS SO ALL 'FUND RAISING' 

IS DELETED - CONTRIBUTE AS YOU ARE INCLINED TO SUPPORT 

IMPORTANT ISSUES! THESE ARE NOT SOLICITATIONS


BRAIN DEAD PARKING LOT ATTORNEY ALINA HABBA WHO'S PRETTY 

IMPRESSIVE CUTTING UP VEGETABLES...CLAIMED SHE'D RATHER BE 

PRETTY THAN SMART BECAUSE SHE COULD FAKE BEING SMART.... 

SHE FLINKED THAT PART....




Apr 6, 2026
One day after Pam Bondi's firing, Alina Habba posted a cryptic message on social media, showing her in the Oval Office with Donald Trump and J.D. Vance. "Always an honor," Habba wrote, next to an American flag emoji. Here's how The Daily Beast read the subtext: "Trump Goon Launches Wild Public Lobbying Campaign for AG Job." If she were nominated, Habba would face confirmation at the time that a reminder of her humiliating defeat is coming to a head. Adam Klasfeld of All Rise News breaks it down. Subscribe to All Rise News to support this work: www.allrisenews.com Subscribe:    / @legalafmtn   Become a member of Legal AF YouTube community:    / @legalafmtn   Become a member of the Legal AF Substack: https://michaelpopok.substack.com/20off Follow Legal AF on Bluesky: https://bsky.app/profile/legalafmtn.b... Follow Michael Popok on Bluesky: https://bsky.app/profile/mspopok.bsky... Subscribe to the Legal AF podcast feed here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast... Subscribe to the Intersection with Michael Popok podcast feed here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast... Subscribe to Unprecedented with Michael Popok and Dina Doll podcast feed here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast... Subscribe to Court of History with Sidney Blumenthal and Sean Wilentz podcast feed here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast...



Sunday, March 1, 2026

Saturday Rewind: Pluck against tyranny

                                                                                                                                                     

  LOTS OF POSTS IGNORED BY BLOGGER.....

ALL POSTS ARE AVAILABLE ON

MIDDLEBORO REVIEW AND SO ON


Saturday Rewind: Pluck against tyranny

The Portland Chicken is due in court again next week in a civil rights battle that has a federal judge thinking about authoritarianism.


Jack Dickinson, a.k.a. The Portland Chicken, on Nov. 5, 2025 (Photo by Maxine Wallace/The Washington Post via Getty Images)

The man known as the Portland Chicken faces off in federal court again against Donald TrumpKristi Noem, and the Department of Homeland Security on Monday, seeking to extend a temporary restraining order that he won weeks ago to protect the rights of protesters and journalists.

Activist Jack Dickinson, a.k.a. the Portland Chicken, is the lead plaintiff in a lawsuit that produced this blistering warning about the threat of authoritarianism in the United States last month.

“In a well-functioning constitutional democratic republic, free speech, courageous newsgathering, and nonviolent protest are all permitted, respected, and even celebrated,” U.S. District Judge Michael H. Simon wrote in a 22-page opinion and order. “In an authoritarian regime, that is not the case. Our nation is now at a crossroads. We have been here before and have previously returned to the right path, notwithstanding an occasional detour. In helping our nation find its constitutional compass, an impartial and independent judiciary operating under the rule of law has a responsibility that it may not shirk.”

In a video interview, Dickinson told All Rise News about the inspiration for the costume, and his American Civil Liberties Union attorney Kelly Simon shed light on the state of the litigation.

“I think the goal was to meet fascism with a sense of absurdity and with a sense of kind of poking fun at this regime that was trying to instill a lot of terror in people,” Dickinson said. “The chicken— I’ve talked about this before — was kind of a reference to the TACO acronym that arose for Trump with his tariff policies. And so I just kind of figured it would be a topical fitting costume. And then it turns out that fluorescent yellow works well as a visual tool, regardless of the context.”

The goal, he said, isn’t to make light about the threat to U.S. democracy.

“What it is meant to represent is kind of punching back at the power that they think they are displaying in this moment and kind of cutting through that with a little bit of whimsy or tactical frivolity, as some people will call it,” Dickinson said.

Filed as a class action, Dickinson v. Trump lists an elderly couple among its co-plaintiffs. Laurie Eckman, 84, joined the action after a federal agent shot her in the head with a pepper ball, causing her to bleed profusely. Her 83-year-old husband Richard Eckman, a retired Navy veteran, had his walker struck with chemical munitions, according to the lawsuit.

“They have no idea why the federal government and its agents decided to come out of the Portland ICE Building and release all manner of munitions, pepper balls, tear gas on the crowd that day,” Kelly Simon said in the interview. “And that's the pattern that we're seeing.”

An evidentiary hearing begins on Monday to determine whether to extend a ruling restricting the use of “chemical or projectile munitions” against protesters and press.

Watch my full interview with Dickinson and Simon on the All Rise News playlist on Legal AF. Paid subscribers can watch that video — and others that ran this week — ad-free below.

Below the paywall:

  • An attorney discusses his fight to release the second volume of Jack Smith’s report.

  • A lawyer who helped beat Trump’s tariffs explains why the next wave are dead letters.

  • A British historian explains why the Epstein files caught fire in the U.K.



Wednesday, January 28, 2026

'Simply murders': Relatives of men killed in boat strikes sue U.S.

                                                                                                                                         

LOTS OF POSTS IGNORED BY BLOGGER.....


ALL POSTS ARE AVAILABLE ON

MIDDLEBORO REVIEW AND SO ON


'Simply murders': Relatives of men killed in boat strikes sue U.S.

The mother of Chad Joseph and sister of Rishi Samaroo, slain in the strikes, say the attacks "lack any plausible legal justification."


Images of a boat strike and its victims from the lawsuit

The family members of two Trinidadian men killed in one of the 36 U.S. strikes on civilian boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific Ocean sued the federal government in Massachusetts.

“These premeditated and intentional killings lack any plausible legal justification,” the 23-page complaint states. ‘Thus, they were simply murders, ordered by individuals at the highest levels of government and obeyed by military officers in the chain of command.”

On Oct. 14, a U.S. strike launched a missile on a boat carrying six people, including Trinidadians Chad Joseph and Rishi Samaroo. All six passengers died, and an estimated 135 people have died in three dozen attacks like it.

Represented by the American Civil Liberties Union and the Center for Constitutional Rights, Joseph’s mother and Samaroo’s sister filed a lawsuit for wrongful death and extrajudicial killing.

“Chad was a loving and caring son who was always there for me, for his wife and children, and for our whole family. I miss him terribly. We all do,” Joseph’s mother Lenore Burnley, the lead plaintiff, wrote in a statement released by the ACLU of Massachusetts. “We know this lawsuit won’t bring Chad back to us, but we’re trusting God to carry us through this, and we hope that speaking out will help get us some truth and closure.”

Both families base their claims on two federal statutes: the Death on the High Seas Act and the Alien Tort Statutes.

“Rishi used to call our family almost every day, and then one day he disappeared, and we never heard from him again,” Samaroo’s sister Sallycar Korasingh said.

The ACLU said that Samaroo was released early on parole from a 15-year sentence two years ago for his participation in a homicide unrelated to the boat strike.

“Rishi was a hardworking man who paid his debt to society and was just trying to get back on his feet again and to make a decent living in Venezuela to help provide for his family,” said Korasingh, who is a co-plaintiff in the lawsuit. “If the U.S. government believed Rishi had done anything wrong, it should have arrested, charged, and detained him, not murdered him. They must be held accountable.”

Donald Trump and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth attempted to justify the strikes, without evidence, on fighting cartel-linked drug trafficking.

The Trinidadian government and the men’s relatives reject those claims.

“Mr. Joseph and Mr. Samaroo were not members of, or affiliated with, drug cartels,” the complaint states. “The Trinidadian government has publicly stated that ‘the government has no information linking Joseph or Samaroo to illegal activities,’ and that it had ‘no information of the victims of U.S. strikes being in possession of illegal drugs, guns, or small arms.’”

Trump’s government has refused to disclose a still-secret Office of Legal Counsel memorandum purporting to justify the strikes.

“Whatever that secret memorandum states, it cannot render the patently illegal killings lawful,” the lawsuit says.

“First, because there is, in fact, no non-international armed conflict with the drug cartels purportedly targeted in the strikes (and no evidence that the boats targeted are associated with cartels), the killings violate the bedrock prohibition against extrajudicial killing and are simply murders on the high seas,” the complaint states. “And second, even if there were a non-international armed conflict between the United States and drug cartels (and even if there were evidence that the boats targeted were associated with the cartels), the strikes would constitute war crimes under the laws of war and federal law.”

Baher Azmy, legal director of the Center for Constitutional Rights, called the government’s justification “absurd and dangerous.”

“These are lawless killings in cold blood; killings for sport and killings for theater, which is why we need a court of law to proclaim what is true and constrain what is lawless,” Azmy said in a statement. “This is a critical step in ensuring accountability, while the individuals responsible may ultimately be answerable criminally for murder and war crimes.”

Read the complaint in full here.



Tuesday, January 20, 2026

Lindsey Halligan's 'masquerade' as U.S. Attorney must end, judges warn

                                                                          

LOTS OF POSTS IGNORED BY BLOGGER.....


ALL POSTS ARE AVAILABLE ON

MIDDLEBORO REVIEW AND SO ON



Lindsey Halligan's 'masquerade' as U.S. Attorney must end, judges warn

Halligan isn't a U.S. Attorney, and she will be referred for discipline if she keeps calling herself one, federal judges warn.


Lindsey Halligan in the Oval Office on March 31. (Photo by Al Drago/Getty Images)

Federal judges aren’t sugarcoating what the Trump DOJ has done to the rule of law.

Journalists must not, either.

Lindsey Halligan is not a U.S. Attorney and must stop referring to herself as one or face possible disciplinary proceedings, a federal judge ruled on Tuesday.

“At the end of the day, Ms. Halligan's response asserts that she is free to act in an unlawful capacity, because she disagrees that she does so unlawfully. But that's not how our legal system works,” U.S. District Judge David Novak, a Trump appointee, ruled. “By having continued to exercise a position to which she was unconstitutionally appointed, including by signing the indictment in this case as ‘United States Attorney,’ Ms. Halligan exercised ‘power that [she] did not lawfully possess.’”

Hours before Novak’s ruling, the Chief Judge of the Eastern District of Virginia separately posted a job listing for her replacement.


‘Undermine the very essence of the Rule of Law’

Shortly before Thanksgiving, U.S. District Judge Cameron McGowan Currie disqualified Halligan and dismissed her cases against James Comey and Letitia James on the grounds that she was unlawfully and unconstitutionally appointed.

Halligan, a Trump White House aide with no prosecutorial experience, remained in the job and continued to sign her name on indictments and legal pleadings.

Judge Novak ordered Halligan to explain why he should not strike the “United States Attorney” affiliation from her signature line and refer her for disciplinary proceedings.

With the Justice Department’s full backing, Halligan defiantly signed a brief ridiculing Novak’s inquiry as an “inquisition” and accusing the judge of making “rudimentary” and “elementary” legal errors. Pam Bondi and Todd Blanche co-signed the brief.

Novak noticed.

The judge wrote that Blanche, Bondi and Halligan’s filing “contains a level of vitriol more appropriate for a cable news talk show and falls far beneath the level of advocacy expected from litigants in this Court, particularly the Department of Justice.”

Judge Novak found it “inconceivable” that the Justice Department “would repeatedly ignore court orders, while simultaneously prosecuting citizens for breaking the law.”

“The Court cannot tolerate such obstinance, because doing so would undermine the very essence of the Rule of Law,” he wrote. “If the Court were to allow Ms. Halligan and the Department of Justice to pick and choose which orders that they will follow, the same would have to be true for other litigants and our system of justice would crumble.”


‘This charade of Ms. Halligan’

Halligan, backed by the Justice Department, tarnished the legacy of her office, the judge wrote.

“The Eastern District of Virginia has long enjoyed the service of experienced prosecutors with unquestioned integrity from both political parties serving as the United States Attorney,” his order states. “Despite coming from different political backgrounds and holding very different ideological views, they all shared an unwavering commitment to the Rule of Law, putting the interests of the citizens of the District before their own personal ambitions, as true public servants do. Unfortunately, it appears that this ethos has come to an end.”

Novak ended his ruling in a similarly scathing fashion.

"In short, this charade of Ms. Halligan masquerading as the United States Attorney for this District in direct defiance of binding court orders must come to an end," he wrote.

For now, Novak stopped short of initiating disciplinary proceedings, but he fired a warning shot.

“The Court recognizes that Ms. Halligan lacks the prosecutorial experience that has long been the norm for those nominated to the position of United States Attorney in this District,” he wrote. “Consequently, and in light of her inexperience, the Court grants Ms. Halligan the benefit of the doubt and refrains from referring her for further investigation and disciplinary action regarding her misrepresentations to this Court at this time.”

Read Judge Novak’s full ruling here.

This Substack is reader-supported. To receive new posts and support this work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.



Wednesday, December 31, 2025

NEW: UNSEALED order in the Abrego Case and the DoJ coverup of the pipe bomber motives

LOTS OF POSTS IGNORED BY BLOGGER.....


ALL POSTS ARE AVAILABLE ON

MIDDLEBORO REVIEW AND SO ON


 
 

NEW: UNSEALED order in the Abrego Case and the DoJ coverup of the pipe bomber motives

A recording from Allison Gill's live video

Get more from Allison Gill in the Substack app
Available for iOS and Android


Important Friday Updates: 9/11/2026

           LOTS OF POSTS IGNORED BY BLOGGER..... OR REMOVED ON THEIR WHIM! ALL POSTS ARE AVAILABLE ON MIDDLEBORO REVIEW AND SO ON BLOGGER DO...