Sunday, February 8, 2026

Susan Tincher public testimony about ICE brutality

                             

LOTS OF POSTS IGNORED BY BLOGGER.....


ALL POSTS ARE AVAILABLE ON

MIDDLEBORO REVIEW AND SO ON



Democracy Labs

686 subscribers


Jan 26, 2026

“I feel afraid. Only hours have passed since they shot a man right in front of me, and I don’t feel like I can go home because I heard agents were looking for me. I don’t know what the agents will do when they find me. I do know that they’re not telling the truth about what happened.” Read those words again. “I feel afraid… I don’t feel like I can go home… they’re not telling the truth.” These are the words of the woman in the pink jacket. Yesterday, she stood feet away as ICE agents assaulted, then murdered, Alex Pretti. She’s afraid. She may be in hiding. Hers is not the lone voice of truth shouting in the darkness. In the file that contained her testimony about yesterday’s events are dozens of others, dating back to December 17, 2025. They are a part of a lawsuit, Tincher v. Noem, challenging ICE violence and misconduct towards Minnesotans. They recount stories of cruelty, abuse of power, and terror. In their own words, people describe being yanked from their cars, cuffed, threatened, and shoved. Vehicles are weaponized. Guns are brandished. One shares the words an ICE agent spoke to them: “You don’t look like you could be more than 18 years old. Is this how you want to die? With a fucking bullet in your skull?” In another, a bystander tells of a pregnant woman being harmed. “Suddenly, the agent kneeling on the woman’s back decided to drag her by the hand to his car.” Yesterday, a physician described their interaction with ICE at the scene of Alex Pretti’s murder. They offered to render aid to him as he lay on the street. They wrote, “At first, the ICE agents wouldn’t let me through… none of the ICE agents who were near the victim were performing CPR.” Instead of letting them through, the healthcare professional alleges that agents repeatedly demanded their physician’s license. When at last they were permitted to approach him, they asked whether he had a pulse. The agents didn’t know. Rather than perform CPR or check for signs of life, ICE appeared to count the bullet holes. The words of this physician mirror the care, or lack thereof, given to Renee Good. A video shot from the house directly next to the site of the crash tells a story of neglect. In it, you can catch a glimpse of Renee. The wound to her head is visible. There is no dressing, no attempt to stop the bleeding. While a physician begs to treat her, Renee sits alone, unattended, for over two minutes. Two minutes without potentially lifesaving care. While a swarm of agents barricade a doctor, she sat alone. If this is not neglect, what is? After reading through a few dozen affidavits, patterns emerge. Several witnesses wrote that ICE appeared to be “egging the crowd on.” They spoke of threats, verbal and physical. Guns drawn in the absence of hostility—used as a tactic to instill compliance. Physical aggression toward observers was common. The rhetoric is that the protesters are violent. The record dissents. Standing isn’t assault. Filming isn’t a threat. Defiance is not harm. The people are not the violent ones. However… shoving is assault. A barrel of a weapon aimed at bodes is a threat. Bruising from cuffs is harm. They claim they are there to protect. They don’t. They pretend to deliver safety. Since when did safety look like abuse? “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” George Orwell wrote these words in his novel 1984. It ought to have been titled 2026. Silence is compliance. We must listen. We must watch. We must read. We must speak. Noise is dissent. It’s time to get loud. Get loud at home, at protests, at council meetings, at work. Get loud everywhere.



How Boston – of all places – offers lessons for the NFL on hiring diversity

                            

LOTS OF POSTS IGNORED BY BLOGGER.....


ALL POSTS ARE AVAILABLE ON

MIDDLEBORO REVIEW AND SO ON


ADVERTISEMENT

Cover Page (4)
Email Header_CWV

Sponsored by The Boston Foundation

Bill Russell and Red Auerbach on a mural of Boston sports legends at the Sports Museum at the TD Garden. (Photo via Creative Commons/Flickr by Lorianne DiSabato)
Bill Russell and Red Auerbach on a mural of Boston sports legends at the Sports Museum at the TD Garden. (Photo via Creative Commons/Flickr by Lorianne DiSabato)

Over the past week, much of the sports focus nationally—and nearly all of it in New England—has been on the Super Bowl. But while excitement was building and we were busy planning our best 7-layer dips and other watch-party staples, the NFL found itself confronting a familiar and uncomfortable reality: Another head coach hiring cycle came and went, and only a single vacancy was filled by a person of color.

The ensuing media coverage and handwringing was predictable. What may be surprising to many is that Boston—a city hardly seen as a leading light on matters of race in recent decades—turns out to offer some sound lessons in how the NFL, or any organization grappling with these issues, can effectively address hiring diversity.

To its credit, the NFL – where a majority of players are Black -- has tried. Since 2003, the league has championed what’s come to be known as the Rooney Rule, which requires teams to interview at least two minority candidates for vacant head coach positions.

This year had a surprisingly large number of vacancies – 10 teams parted ways with their coaches at the end of the season. After a flurry of activity to fill all the positions, however, no Black candidates were hired and only one candidate of color, Robert Saleh, the son of Lebanese immigrants, was tapped to lead a team.

The question now, as always, is whether the Rooney Rule’s mandated interviews with candidates of color are real or merely performative “check-the-box” exercises?

After 23 years, it’s clear that most head coach hiring decisions are effectively made before interviews ever begin, with the Rooney Rule simply regulating the most visible part of the process: interviews. What the rule, however well-intentioned, doesn’t address is the invisible part, where real trust is formed and decisions are shaped long before anyone sits down across a table. Boston has long grappled with this same challenge – but with some surprisingly positive outcomes.

The Boston Foundation is deeply committed to civic leadership, and essential to our work is the exchange of informed opinions. We are proud to partner on a platform that engages such a broad range of demographic and ideological viewpoints.

We welcome informed commentary about local, state and national public policy.

 

Have a scoop you want to share? Click below to get in touch with the CommonWealth Beacon team.








SLOW ZONE SHORTSLEEVE IS DESPERATE! 
THE MBTA WAS LEFT IN A DISASTER THAT IS WELL KNOWN & WIDESPREAD - THIS GUY WAS IN CHARGE OF THE MESS! 
AND THAT NO BID BATHROOM/LUNCHROOM - THAT'S JUST BASIC COMMON SENSE! 
FIRST SLOW ZONE SHORTSLEEVE COMES OUT WITH A FAKE AI AD - 
HOW PATHETIC! 
NOW PRETENDING HE'S THE WHIZZ KID OF ECONOMICS! 
IF HE CAUSED SO MUCH DESTRUCTION AT THE MBTA, JUST 
IMAGINE WHAT HE CAN DO ON BEACON HILL!
LET'S REMEMBER THAT UNDER THE LEADERSHIP OF SLOW ZONE SHORTSLEEVE, OUT OF STATE "EXPERTS" WERE HIRED WHO NEVER TRAVELED TO THE COMMONWEALTH! THEY WERE GENEROUSLY PAID! GOV. HEALEY QUICKLY ADDRESSED THAT IDIOCY!


 
 
 
CommonWealth Beacon Logo

Published by MassINC




Susan Tincher public testimony about ICE brutality

                              LOTS OF POSTS IGNORED BY BLOGGER..... ALL POSTS ARE AVAILABLE ON MIDDLEBORO  REVIEW AND SO ON Democracy Labs 6...