Showing posts with label DISCRIMINATION. Show all posts
Showing posts with label DISCRIMINATION. Show all posts

Friday, October 6, 2023

Informed Comment daily updates (10/06/2023)

In Historic Announcement, Biden Bans Anti-Muslim, Anti-Jewish Discrimination under Title VI for Federal Agencies

In Historic Announcement, Biden Bans Anti-Muslim, Anti-Jewish Discrimination under Title VI for Federal Agencies

Ann Arbor (Informed Comment) – It is a truism that there are some ethnic groups in the United States toward whom it is still permitted to show bigotry. Whereas public figures can be cancelled for racism against African Americans, Hispanics, and other groups, ragging on Muslim Americans is a blood sport in American politics. Trump […]

Top 6 Reasons why Global Temperatures are Breaking all the Records

Top 6 Reasons why Global Temperatures are Breaking all the Records

By Andrew King, The University of Melbourne | – The world is very warm right now. We’re not only seeing record temperatures, but the records are being broken by record-wide margins. Take the preliminary September global-average temperature anomaly of 1.7°C above pre-industrial levels, for example. It’s an incredible 0.5°C above the previous record. So why […]

The Guantánamo Prison Camp may someday be Closed, but it Will leave a Permanent Scar on America’s Conscience

The Guantánamo Prison Camp may someday be Closed, but it Will leave a Permanent Scar on America’s Conscience

( Tomdispatch.com) – For 18 years, I’ve been writing articles for TomDispatch on the never-ending story of the Guantánamo Bay Detention Facility. And here’s my ultimate takeaway (for the moment): 21 years after that grim offshore prison of injustice was set up in Cuba in response to the 9/11 attacks and the capture of figures […]

Old posts you may have missed

Extremist Minister Ben-Gvir opposes Jailing Ultra-Orthodox who spit on Christians in Jerusalem, as Pope Francis Fumes

Palestinian Americans are Now Tourists in their own Land; Millions remain Exiled or Stateless

Made in America: How Biden’s Climate Package is Fuelling the Global Drive to Net Zero

Frankenstein’s Monster of a Climate Emergency: Dangerous Global September Heat Spike

Trump’s Anti-War Stance is a Sham; But his real War is on America

The Death of the Armenian Dream in Nagorno-Karabakh was Predictable but not Inevitable

AI Goes to War: Will the Pentagon’s Techno-Fantasies Pave the Way for War with China?

 





Friday, December 2, 2022

“From Junkie to Judge: One Woman’s Triumph Over Trauma and Addiction.”

 


I first shot methamphetamine when I was 17. As an abused child seeking relief from trauma and stress, I’d turned to alcohol at age 12 and had used numerous drugs to excess before sticking that needle in my arm. In 1979, at age 18, I was arrested for possession of meth and syringes.
Knowing I was a good student headed to college, without a criminal record, the judge reduced the charges to disorderly person, which was below a misdemeanor. As a result, I was not incarcerated. And when he sentenced me, the judge ordered that my record be expunged if I did not get convicted for the next few years. I also was allowed to leave New Jersey to attend college in California, after a one-year delay, even though I still was on probation. The criminal justice system showed me mercy and allowed me to build a life.
I regained a bit of control over my drug use in college, until I succumbed to a severe meth addiction that lasted from my senior year until I was 32. During that decade, I carried meth with me every day. I was pulled over for tickets multiple times and was in car accidents that involved police response. But the police never searched me. Not even when I had been awake for days and looked like a tweaker, with a scabby face and twitchy hands.
While I had to work hard to build a robust recovery foundation, as everyone does, my University of California, Berkeley, education allowed me to reenter the workforce with relative ease.
I then graduated from Berkeley Law at nine years sober, at the age of 42. When I applied to obtain my law license, due to the expungement, I had a clean criminal record. It was the same years later when I had to pass a security screening to become a federal administrative law judge. Had I had an extensive arrest record, I likely would not have been appointed a judge, despite my 20 years of sobriety at that point.
My drug addiction story has been a humbling series of breaks, granting me second and third chances.
That wasn’t luck. Based on the data, I am confident I benefited from the white color of my skin.
People of color experience discrimination at every stage of the criminal legal system. They are more likely to be stopped, searched, arrested, convicted, harshly sentenced and saddled with a lifelong criminal record. This is particularly the case for drug law violations.
The Public Policy Institute of California has found that Black drivers are stopped at night at twice the rate of white drivers. In addition, police search Black and Latino drivers at a much higher frequency even though the discovery rates of contraband are lower than for white people. Similarly, Black and Latino drivers are overrepresented in being detained and handcuffed.
Black men in California are 42% more likely, and Latino men 32.5% more likely, to be sentenced to prison than white men with similar criminal records and convictions.
I do not mean to suggest that the most significant impact from these racial disparities is that I was able to become a judge and those with notable criminal records cannot. The consequences of racial discrimination and white privilege in my life are trivial compared with the effects for victims, which include limited job opportunities, the breakup of families, lost years spent in jail or prison and the trauma associated with knowing your community does not receive equal or fair treatment.
I am proud of my accomplishments and appreciate that my hard work, on my recovery and professionally, was a prerequisite to my judicial appointment. Still, I also am aware that this success almost certainly would not have been possible had I been a different color.
Mary Beth O’Connor, a retired federal administrative law judge, is the author of the forthcoming “From Junkie to Judge: One Woman’s Triumph Over Trauma and Addiction.”
© 2022 Los Angeles Times





Thursday, October 22, 2020

DISABILITY AWARENESS MONTH, INTOLERANCE & BIGOTRY & HATE, LGBTQ RIGHTS




FROM A FACEBOOK POSTER:

The other night I made a post asking people who intended on voting for Trump in this election to unfriend me on Facebook. This post created some backlash and I’ve been accused of being unpatriotic, not having respect for other opinions, not believing or understanding how Democracy works and even not allowing other people to have an opinion different from mine.
I’d like to say something.
I grew up hiding who I was. I walked the halls of EVERY SINGLE educational establishment in fear. In MeadowBrook Junior High it could have been a swift punch on the shoulder while “Fucking faggot” was whispered just loud enough that everyone but the teachers would hear.
One night outside my dorm room in the Christian college of OVC a few guys banged on my door and threatened “There’s no room for fucking faggots here. You should go home where you belong."
In the relative safety of progressive Athens, I once had a professor at Ohio University openly mock my homosexuality in front of the entire class. No one stood up for me, no one reprimanded the professor.
My partner Bruno and I would never dream of holding hands in many places in Athens. The other week we stopped at Walmart for window blinds and we subconsciously kept a distance from each other. It would have been foolish to invite trouble after having walked by all the pickup trucks with Trump stickers on our way in.
So. Here we are. I’m 40 years old and very likely will never feel completely safe in this country that I love. It’s an election year. And the party that Trump is representing would like to:
1. Take marriage back to only between a man and a woman.
2. Support adoption agencies that refuse same-sex couples
3. Affirm conversion therapy
4. Ban transgender people from their appropriate bathrooms
5. Support “Religious Freedom” for businesses to refuse service to LGBTQ customers
So, when I ask that you remove me from your “friends” list on Facebook and it upsets you? Let me tell you something.
1. Not being able to marry upsets me.
2. Not being able to adopt upsets me.
3. Being told I can “pray the gay away” by a therapist upsets me.
4. Having friends harassed for going to the bathroom upsets me.
5. Being turned away from the grocery store because I’m gay upsets me.
And you're upset because I don’t want to be friends with someone who supports this discrimination?
CRY ME A FUCKING RIVER.
I understand completely how Democracy works. Whoever is elected president will be my president. I’ll be glad I voted either way.
You are more than in your right to vote proudly for who you want. And I’m more than in my right to decide we aren’t going to be friends because of it.
I can respect your opinion but when your opinion is that I don’t have the human right to marry, well, how much respect do you think would be adequate? Should I gleefully drive you to the polls so you can vote to strip away my human rights? Should I pour a glass of champagne for you when I’m told I can’t buy bread from the bakery because the owner doesn’t agree with my lifestyle? Oh, I guess you’ll have to buy the champagne since that wine shop has a “NO GAYS SERVED” sign in the window. My bad!
So how about this: If it bothers you that I don’t want to be your BFF after you proudly stake that Trump/Pence sign in your yard then I suggest you get over it.
Because trust me, I already have.



Wednesday, June 17, 2020

RSN: FOCUS: Supreme Court's Landmark LGBTQ Employment Decision Is Even Bigger Than Marriage Equality






Reader Supported News
16 June 20

Bad enough to allow your privacy to bought and sold on Wall Street?
Bad enough to be led to vote for policies that subvert social justice?
Bad enough to empower individuals and interests who profit from human suffering on an immense scale?
Notice the difference at Reader Supported News?
Help us pay the bills. It’s not so much.
Marc Ash
Founder, Reader Supported News

If you would prefer to send a check:
Reader Supported News
PO Box 2043
Citrus Hts, CA 95611



Reader Supported News
16 June 20
It's Live on the HomePage Now:
Reader Supported News


FOCUS: Supreme Court's Landmark LGBTQ Employment Decision Is Even Bigger Than Marriage Equality
Joseph Fons holding a Pride Flag, stands in front of the U.S. Supreme Court building after the court ruled that LGBTQ people can not be disciplined or fired based on their sexual orientation. (photo: Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)
David S. Cohen, Rolling Stone
Cohen writes: "Even in the middle of a resurging pandemic, it's important to remember that good things still exist. Today, the Supreme Court gave us that reminder in the form of a 6-3 decision that LGBTQ people are protected against employment discrimination."

EXCERPT:
To get colloquial for a second here — this is huge. When the Supreme Court ruled in 2015 that states could not ban same-sex marriage, it was a momentous step for equality. However, that ruling only applied to those gay and lesbian people who wanted to marry. For countless reasons, many LGBTQ folks will not want to marry over the course of their lives, so the 2015 decision, while symbolically important to all LGBTQ people, was only practically relevant to a subset.
Not today’s decision. Why? Because virtually every LGBTQ person will work over the course of their lifetime. And after today, every one of those people will work knowing that they are protected under federal law against being treated differently because of their sexual orientation or gender identity. Today’s decision is an unequivocal GOOD THING because it is a sea change for equality.
The ruling today was a combined ruling in three cases — two about discrimination against gay people and one about discrimination against a transgender person. Justice Neil Gorsuch, President Trump’s first appointee to the Supreme Court, wrote the opinion that covered all three cases. Chief Justice John Roberts and the Court’s four liberals joined Justice Gorsuch in the opinion.
The central dispute in the cases is over whether the term “sex” in Title VII (the federal anti-discrimination law that applies to workforces of 15 people or more) includes sexual orientation and gender identity. The law doesn’t mention “sexual orientation” or “gender identity” at all, but Justice Gorsuch said that doesn’t matter. He concluded that “it is impossible to discriminate against a person for being homosexual or transgender without discriminating against that individual based on sex.”
He then reasoned very simply to explain his conclusion. I don’t normally like big long quotes like this, but his explanation is very straightforward and instructive, so it’s worth reading:
“Consider, for example, an employer with two employees, both of whom are attracted to men. The two individuals are, to the employer’s mind, materially identical in all respects, except that one is a man and the other a woman. If the employer fires the male employee for no reason other than the fact he is attracted to men, the employer discriminates against him for traits or actions it tolerates in his female colleague. Put differently, the employer intentionally singles out an employee to fire based in part on the employee’s sex, and the affected employee’s sex is a but-for cause of his discharge. Or take an employer who fires a transgender person who was identified as a male at birth but who now identifies as a female. If the employer retains an otherwise identical employee who was identified as female at birth, the employer intentionally penalizes a person identified as male at birth for traits or actions that it tolerates in an employee identified as female at birth. Again, the individual employee’s sex plays an unmistakable and impermissible role in the discharge decision.”














Wednesday, May 6, 2020

RSN: FOCUS: Jesse Jackson | We Must Protect the Right to Vote in the November Elections








 

Reader Supported News
06 May 20

It's Live on the HomePage Now:
Reader Supported News


"I'LL ONLY DONATE IF I THINK YOU'RE GOING OUT OF BUSINESS" A reader wrote in the other day saying, "I'll only donate if I think you are going out of business." Therein lies the problem clearly stated, no? What this funding drive and all funding drives are about is moving away from that way of thinking. Time to think. / Marc Ash, Founder Reader Supported News

Sure, I'll make a donation!


FOCUS: Jesse Jackson | We Must Protect the Right to Vote in the November Elections
Reverend Jesse Jackson. (photo: Getty)
Jesse Jackson, The Chicago Sun-Times
Jackson writes: "The coronavirus does not discriminate, but people do. The coronavirus is not partisan, but politicians are. When we should be coming together to address a shared crisis, some are intent on driving us apart and exacting partisan advantage in the midst of the crisis."

The Republican Party is doing everything it can to suppress the vote in November. Why? They fear higher turnout, especially among people of color, will cost them the election.


Across the country, Republicans are intensifying their efforts to make it harder to vote, with particular focus on suppressing the votes of African Americans and other minorities.

With the pandemic making in-person voting dangerous, Congress should move rapidly to provide resources to help every state create systems for voting by mail. The first rescue package, the CARES Act, included some money for vote-by-mail programs, but far short of what is needed.

Why not provide it? Republicans are worried that voting by mail may increase turnout, particularly among low-income and minority voters. Donald Trump voiced the fear, saying “They had things, levels of voting, that if you’d ever agreed to it, you’d never have a Republican elected in this country again.” Trump said this in March, dismissing Democratic efforts to expand mail-in voting, make registration easier, and extend voting days.

Republican voters in states that already have widespread vote by mail support the program overwhelmingly. Some sensibly argue that vote by mail might actually help Republicans this fall, because older voters — who tend to be more conservative — are more likely to be reluctant to expose themselves to the virus by going to crowded voting places. But Republican history, grounded in the Southern party base that has always sought to suppress the black vote, makes them fear efforts to make voting easier for all.

In Wisconsin, we saw the deadly effects of that. Wisconsin Republicans in control of the state legislature blocked the Democratic governor’s effort to allow widespread vote by mail in the primary. When state election officials were swamped by a staggering demand for absentee ballots, they refused to extend the time for voting, ensuring that thousands never received a response to their request for a ballot. 

At the same time, officials were slashing the number of voting precincts, worried they’d lack volunteers to staff them. In Milwaukee, the home of two-thirds of the black population in Wisconsin, the number of polling places was reduced from 180 to five. That guaranteed long lines that surely made it impossible for many still at work to vote and put those who did vote at risk. Dozens who went to vote have since contracted the coronavirus.

Simultaneously, conservatives in Wisconsin have joined with Republicans to push purging of voter lists. From 2016 to 2018, Wisconsin purged 14 percent of voters on its rolls (the national average is about 7.6 percent). In the most recent round, election officials sent letters to 232,000 voters who would be removed if they did not respond. One in eight voters in Milwaukee were at risk. Voters in black neighborhoods were nearly twice as likely to be flagged as those in white neighborhoods.

In Georgia in 2018, the Republican candidate for governor, Brian Kemp, was serving as the secretary of state. He sought to purge 300,000 voters, and 53,000 voter registrations were put on hold; 80 percent were people of color. Two hundred voting precincts were closed, most in areas with large black populations. The Democratic candidate, Stacy Abrams, lost the race by a margin far less than the votes that were suppressed.

As she noted, “Especially in states like Georgia, where diversifying demographics have us on the precipice of transformative political change, we are seeing Republicans employ voter suppression to limit who has access to the polls. Disproportionately, under GOP secretaries of state, this process affects Democrats, particularly in communities of color. The clear intention is to strip people of their right to vote.”

In state after state, conservative groups are suing to force purges. The Trump Justice Department has piled on: a June 2017 letter went to 44 states saying it would review how the states were planning to “remove the names of ineligible voters.”

Purging voters, blocking vote by mail, requiring official voter ID, closing precincts, limiting early voting, limiting the hours that voting booths are open, blocking same day or automatic voter registration, gerrymandering to segregate the minority vote — the list goes on.

Voting is the fundamental basis of democracy. Particularly in times of crisis, it is vital that the people’s voice be heard. The president and the modern-day Republican Party are convinced that if everyone votes, they will not fare well. Think about that.

Our last presidential election was marred by foreign intervention and WikiLeaks. We couldn’t stop that. But we should not steal from ourselves. We cannot allow the coming election to be scarred by homegrown intervention and TrickiLeaks.


 
READ MORE


Contribute to RSN

Become a Fan of RSN on Facebook and Twitter

Update My Monthly Donation










Saturday, April 25, 2020

RSN: Bill McKibben | Stuck in the Past on the Climate






Reader Supported News
25 April 20



Super important to get these few donations in. The dollar figures are by no means daunting. Your donation has made the difference in building RSN from day one. Invest in freedom support RSN with a donation.

Thank you sincerely.

Marc Ash
Founder, Reader Supported News







If you would prefer to send a check:
Reader Supported News
PO Box 2043
Citrus Hts, CA 95611




Reader Supported News
25 April 20

It's Live on the HomePage Now:
Reader Supported News





Bill McKibben | Stuck in the Past on the Climate
Bill McKibben. (photo: Wolfgang Schmidt)
Bill McKibben, The New York Times
McKibben writes: "If you want to know why young people increasingly despair that the rest of us will leave them without a habitable world, consider the case of Lee Raymond."

EXCERPT:

Shareholders at JP Morgan Chase should block a former Exxon chief from another term on the bank’s board.

f you want to know why young people increasingly despair that the rest of us will leave them without a habitable world, consider the case of Lee Raymond.
At a time when millions are losing their jobs, JP Morgan Chase said this month that 81-year-old Mr. Raymond would be up for re-election to his post as the bank’s lead independent director when its shareholders meet in May, despite the fact that he led a company that has helped cause chaos on a scale hard to even imagine.
The bank said that Mr. Raymond had offered not to stand for re-election, given his age, but that the bank’s board wanted him to retain his seat because “his broad experience” both within and outside JP Morgan was “in the best interests” of shareholders.




A healthcare worker and a patient. (photo: ABC News)
A healthcare worker and a patient. (photo: ABC News)


Coronavirus Has Killed Nearly 52,000 People in the US, Over a Quarter of the World's Deaths
Christina Maxouris, CNN
Maxouris writes: "Less than three months since the first known coronavirus death in the US, the country's fatalities make up more than quarter of the global death toll."
READ MORE


'A spokesman for Gov. Larry Hogan's administration said the agency received more than 100 calls about disinfectant and COVID-19.' (photo: istock)
'A spokesman for Gov. Larry Hogan's administration said the agency received more than 100 calls about disinfectant and COVID-19.' (photo: istock)




Maryland Emergency Hotline Receives More Than 100 Calls About Consuming Disinfectant After Trump Comments
Joseph Guzman, The Hill
Guzman writes: "Maryland emergency officials are warning state residents not to inject or ingest disinfectant after more than 100 people called the state's emergency hotline regarding questions about disinfectant use and COVID-19."
READ MORE


Thelma Edwards, 88, the oldest living relative of Emmett Till, poses for a portrait at the Marion County Black History Museum on 12, March 2020, in Ocala, Florida. (photo: Zack Wittman/Guardian UK)
Thelma Edwards, 88, the oldest living relative of Emmett Till, poses for a portrait at the Marion County Black History Museum on 12, March 2020, in Ocala, Florida. (photo: Zack Wittman/Guardian UK)


Will Justice Finally Be Done for Emmett Till? Family Hope a 65-Year Wait May Soon Be Over
Ed Pilkington, Guardian UK
Pilkington writes: "Not a day has been spent in jail nor a penny paid in compensation for the brutal murder of a 14-year-old boy in Mississippi that helped spark the civil rights movement."
READ MORE


Protesters block the street in front of the Supreme Court as it hears arguments on whether gay and transgender people are covered by a federal law barring employment discrimination on the basis of sex on October 8, 2019. (photo: Bill Clark/CQ-Roll Call/Getty Images)
Protesters block the street in front of the Supreme Court as it hears arguments on whether gay and transgender people are covered by a federal law barring employment discrimination on the basis of sex on October 8, 2019. (photo: Bill Clark/CQ-Roll Call/Getty Images)


The Trump Administration Could Soon Allow Doctors to Discriminate Against LGBTQ People
Katelyn Burns, Vox
Burns writes: "The Trump administration is expected to soon finalize a Department of Health and Human Services administrative rule to roll back health care discrimination protections for LGBTQ people, according to a Politico report."
READ MORE


Jair Bolsonaro. (photo: Evaristo SA/Getty Images)
Jair Bolsonaro. (photo: Evaristo SA/Getty Images)


Brazil Justice Minister Resigns Over Bolsonaro's Interference in Investigations - and Impeachment Talk Ramps Up
Andrew Fishman and Cecilia Olliveira, The Intercept
Excerpt: "As the country slept Friday morning, far-right Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro fired the Federal Police Director Maurício Valeixo, bringing to a head a long-simmering battle with Justice Minister Sergio Moro. Moro, in turn, promptly resigned - in a new, major episode of deepening chaos in Brazilian politics."
READ MORE


A winter sanctuary for monarch butterflies, in Sierra Chincua, Mexico. (photo: Joel Sartore/CBS)
A winter sanctuary for monarch butterflies, in Sierra Chincua, Mexico. (photo: Joel Sartore/CBS)


Insect Populations on Land Are Down 25%, Study Shows
Jordan Davidson, EcoWatch
Davidson writes: "If you haven't noticed as many bees, butterflies and fireflies as you used to, there's a good reason for that."
READ MORE














Top News | 'He’s Not Going to Run Unopposed': Sanders Rejects Schumer for Majority Leader

                                                               LOTS OF POSTS IGNORED BY BLOGGER..... OR REMOVED ON THEIR WHIM! ALL POSTS ARE...