Saturday, August 6, 2022

“If I didn’t have a primary, I wouldn’t care”


Justice Democrats

Do you remember Eliot Engel?

During the 2020 primary election, he was caught on tape saying “If I didn’t have a primary, I wouldn’t care in regards to a call for peaceful protests in New York.

Jamaal Bowman defeated Eliot Engel despite being endorsed by Nancy Pelosi, and having massive amounts of money from corporate PACs. The people chose Jamaal because they knew he would actually fight for their interests.

Well, Eliot Engel just endorsed Jamaal’s primary opponent. It seems like old-guard Democrats like Eliot Engel are more focused on settling old scores and defeating progressive principals like Jamaal than using their resources to hold the Democratic majority ahead of a tough midterm fight.

Early voting starts in just eight days and the election is in just over two weeks. Will you split a contribution right now between Justice Democrats and Jamaal Bowman right now to help us fight back against the political establishment and Eliot Engel? 


We can’t let the establishment political machine oust Jamaal Bowman from Congress. Thank you for your support today.

In solidarity,

Team JD







Do not worry if you cannot afford to make a contribution — we understand that this is a difficult time. If you’re struggling, you can find a food bank here. We appreciate everything you do to keep our movement strong.

Please stay informed and follow the most up-to-date recommendations from the Centers for Disease Control and your state public health department.






 

Donate

Paid for by Justice Democrats

Not authorized by any candidate or candidate’s committee.
JusticeDemocrats.com
10629 Hardin Valley Rd, #226, Knoxville, TN 37932
Email us: us@justicedemocrats.com





This needs to be a national story.

 

Real Justice

This needs to be a national story.

In the Deep South, voters in Memphis, Tennessee showed up in a MAJOR way to oust conservative DA Amy Weirich and elect Steve Mulroy — a progressive reformer and civil rights attorney. 

It's a HUGE deal. THANK YOU to everyone who worked hard for this victory.⁠

We contacted thousands of voters to help elect Steve, a fighter for civil rights, justice, and accountability. Steve will be “tough on crime” by introducing real public safety solutions that actually invest in our communities instead of criminalizing them. ⁠

FORMER DA Amy Weirich said she was "tough on crime" but what she actually meant was sending as many Black people to jail as possible. 

Amy regularly committed prosecutorial misconduct, including withholding evidence before trial to send innocent Black people to jail — including her attempt to send Pamela Moses to prison for six years for registering to vote.⁠

She prosecuted more kids as adults than the rest of Tennessee combined and nearly all of them are Black.⁠ Racial discrimination was so rampant that multiple County Commissioners endorsed a racial equity audit of her office⁠.

Meanwhile, Memphis is number one in the nation for violent crime per capita and it’s gone up every year that Amy has been in office. More proof that over-policing our communities doesn’t keep us safe. 

Black and brown bodies had been suffering in Memphis for too long under her reign and last night, voters made it clear that they’ve had enough and elected Steve Mulroy to replace her. 

Amy even tried to bring Steve’s campaign down by directly mentioning us and our work in a dishonest radio ad that featured some of the same fear-mongering we’ve seen in San Francisco, Philadelphia, Los Angeles, and other cities where we’ve elected pro-civil rights DAs. 

But it didn’t work. After Chesa was recalled, the national media claimed that our movement was on the decline. But now, in a city bigger than San Francisco, we’ve elected a champion for justice and civil rights in Steve Mulroy. 

Police unions and conservative mega-donors can continue working to oppose our movement, but together we will keep fighting to elect pro-civil rights and pro-justice DAs like Steve all across America.⁠

Let's keep pushing forward.

— Real Justice

P.S. We have a BIG FIGHT coming up in Texas in just two months, and it’s going to take ALL OF US to make sure that our justice champions in Dallas and San Antonio are re-elected. Can you split a donation right now, between the candidates and Real Justice, so that we can build on our victories and continue this important work in Texas?




 
DonateLike on FacebookFollow on Twitter

Pol. Adv. paid for by Real Justice PAC, realjusticepac.org. Authorized by John Creuzot Campaign, and Joe Gonzales Campaign. Not authorized by any other federal, state, or local candidate or candidate’s committee.

Email us: info@realjusticepac.org





Maxwell Frost needs our help

 

I’m thrilled to announce my endorsement of Maxwell Frost in his historic race for Congress.

Young people are demanding change. They will face the harshest consequences if Congress fails to act on climate change, gun violence, and an economic system that increasingly serves only the wealthy.

If elected, Maxwell would be the first member of Gen Z in Congress. His experience working at the ACLU to restore the right to vote for 1.6 million Floridians and at March for Our Lives leading thousands of young people across the country in the effort to pass gun reform legislation, is what we need in Congress.

But the GOP is determined to have a conservative pro-Trump Republican be the first Gen Z member. Conservative extremists like Ted Cruz are lining up to pour money into their campaigns.

We have an unprecedented chance to send Maxwell to Congress to fight for a future young people are excited about. But he is relying on grassroots support from people like you. Can I count on you to join me in supporting Maxwell by splitting a contribution between his campaign and our efforts organizing the progressive movement?


Young people are overwhelmingly progressive, but the GOP is resorting to hate and conspiracy theories to cling to power and appease their wealthy donors.

I’ve never been afraid to disrupt the status quo in my career-long fight to protect and advance the rights of workers, women, immigrants, communities of color, and our LGBTQ+ community.

I’m proud to have introduced the Green New Deal and know progress is possible. But only if we elect the next generation of leaders like Maxwell.

So I’m asking you to make a choice:

We can let the GOP elect the first Gen Z member of Congress and shape the future trajectory of Congress for decades to come, or we can band together and step up to help Maxwell win in just 18 days.

If you are ready to stand for change, I’m asking you to join our team and build this movement with us. Will you split $10, or any amount you can? Every dollar counts.

In solidarity,

Ed Markey

CONTRIBUTE




 


Paid for by The Markey Committee

The Markey Committee
PO Box 120029
Boston, MA 02112
United States









150 kittens and cats took an airline flight from Florida to New Bedford. Here's why.



150 kittens and cats took an airline flight from Florida to New Bedford. Here's why.


Matthew Ferreira Standard Times
Published Aug 5, 2022 

NEW BEDFORD — If you think there are a lot of stray and "outside" cats in your SouthCoast neighborhood, Mike Keiley, director of adoption centers and programs for MSPCA Angell, says you should see Florida, where tourist season doubles as peak cat breeding season. 

"The warm climate there means optimal breeding seasons for outdoor cats, so Florida's cat population is much higher than Massachusetts," Keiley said. "And one of the best things about Massachusetts is that it's one of the states with the highest cat ownership."

That's why on Wednesday, MSPCA flew in roughly 150 cats and kittens from the Sunshine State to New Bedford Regional Airport via jet funded by Greater Good Charities' Good Flights program to be adopted out through several shelters that have the space to accommodate them. The landing signified the start of the "Southern Hub" project, which MSPCA looks to spin into an ongoing effort to help relieve the strain caused by Florida's overpopulation of cats.

On Tuesday, Aug. 3, about 150 cats from Florida were flown to New Bedford Regional Airport to be adopted out of Southeastern Massachusetts shelters as part of a new ASPCA program.


"We’d been working continuously to build out an entire flight, and it came down to literally last night when we finalized the roster," Keiley said on Wednesday shortly after the cats' Whaling City arrival around 11:30 a.m. "The flight was at 6 a.m. It's very hot in Florida so we wanted to make sure these animals weren't exposed to too much heat."

After landing, the cats were transported to several ASPCA shelters and affiliates — including locations in Cape Cod,Salem, Boston and Methuen — where they would undergo a 48-hour isolation period as per Massachusetts state regulation, as well as veterinary check-ups before they could be considered adoptable in time for a weekend adoption event at all said locations.

MSPCA and Northeast Animal Shelter vans arrive at New Bedford Regional Airport on Wednesday, Aug. 3 to transport the 150 cats from Florida to Southeastern Massachusetts shelters to be adopted.

COVID inflated, then deflated, pet adoption

But while Florida's climate makes the state especially susceptible to cat overpopulation, there's yet another factor impacting animal welfare nationwide, Keiley said.

"We're doing this during a really difficult time in animal welfare, where, over the last couple of years of the COVID pandemic, we saw an incredible lift in adoption which has been hugely helpful during a really unstable time in our nation. However now we're finding the same number of animals are coming into shelter, but the adoption interest has dropped," Keiley said. "According to Shelter Animals Count, which is a trusted database that tracks data surrounding animal sheltering, there's a 6% Surplus of dogs and cats throughout the country and animals coming in at the same pace as 2019, but they're not getting adopted at the same rate as they were even last year."

This plane carrying about 150 cats and kittens from Florida to be adopted out through Southeastern Massachusetts shelters touched down at New Bedford Regional Airport Wednesday.

Implications of cat overpopulation

According to the U.S. Humane Society, "Predation by outdoor cats on birds and other wildlife is a real and legitimate concern. While The HSUS believes that outdoor cats are entitled to protection, it also believes that wildlife populations need to be protected from cats." In addition, Keiley says there are nuisance issues to consider. "I think, in a broad statement, anytime there’s an overpopulation of outdoor cats, there’s an impact on complaints from neighbors if they’re spraying or fighting, and it’s in everybody’s best interest to deal with the overpopulation issue with cats and other animals," he said.

On Wednesday, Aug. 3, about 150 cats from Florida were flown to New Bedford Regional Airport to be adopted out of Southeastern Massachusetts shelters as part of a new ASPCA program.

Lessons from Katrina

While relocation of animals as a means to mitigate those impacts is not a new concept, Keiley says Wednesday's efforts were reflective of a stepped-up approach first "mainstreamed" within the animal welfare field as result of Hurricane Katrina in 2005, when thousands of animals throughout Louisiana and the Gulf Coast were suddenly displaced. The benefit of this approach is multifold, Keiley said.

"It’s very common to relocate animals from one shelter to another for adoption, but I think what you’re seeing is one more step beyond that here, where the Florida shelters that the cats are coming from are refilling those cages with cats from other shelters around them that just don’t have the same level of resources or are really overburdened with the number of cats coming in," Keiley said. "They’re getting that relief more directly in a way that’s more achievable for them than it would be it they were trying to get them to Massachusetts on their own."

On Wednesday, Aug. 3, about 150 cats from Florida were flown to New Bedford Regional Airport to be adopted out of Southeastern Massachusetts shelters as part of a new ASPCA program.

Keeping it going

Keiley says Wednesday's flight was hopefully only the first of many more to come. "The hope is to continue doing this on a regular basis because the need is really continuous in Florida," he said. "Maybe in the winter the need isn't as great, but by the time we get to June, July and August, the number of cats coming into shelters throughout Florida outpaces the ability to rehome them.

"We know that Massachusetts residents love cats, and we need those adopters now more than ever."

In addition to permanent adoptive homes, Keiley also noted that there is also great demand for temporary animal foster homes and donations. To get involved, visit www.mcpca.org.

On Wednesday, Aug. 3, about 150 cats from Florida were flown to New Bedford Regional Airport to be adopted out of Southeastern Massachusetts shelters as part of a new ASPCA program.

If you go

WHAT: Southern Hub adoption event for newly arrived cats and kittens

WHERE: Northeast Animal Shelter, 347 Highland Ave., Salem; MSPCA Cape Cod, 1577 Falmouth Rd., Centerville; MSPCA Boston, 350 S. Huntington Ave., Boston; and MSPCA Methuen, 400 Broadway, Methuen.

WHEN: Saturday, Aug. 6; Sunday, Aug 7

HOW: Interested adopters can register for the event at www.mspca.org/events/kitten-adoption-event. Advance appointments are required. To register, visit www.mspca.org/events/kitten-adoption-event.



 LINK





The 57th anniversary of the 1965 Voting Rights Act

 


Roy Cooper for North Carolina

On this day 57 years ago, President Lyndon B. Johnson signed the Voting Rights Act into law — but the fight for access to the ballot box is not over!

Roy Cooper is working hard to make sure EVERY North Carolinian is able to have their voice heard in our elections.

Chip in to support the fight >>>

DONATE

Generations of activists fought to ensure all Americans had the right to vote. Much of that fight took place right here in North Carolina.

But now, Republicans are doing everything possible to prevent some voters from having access to the ballot box. Restrictive voting measures all too often target voters of color, which makes it impossible for communities of color to exercise their full political power.

If NC Republicans gain legislative supermajorities after the November midterms, it’s likely they’ll continue to pass limitations on voting rights for our state, and Roy WOULDN’T be able to block them.

Help prevent GOP supermajorities in Raleigh! Donate today so Roy can protect our voting rights in North Carolina >>>

Thank you!

Team Cooper



SEND DONATIONS VIA CHECK TO:
COOPER FOR NORTH CAROLINA
PO BOX 1190
RALEIGH, NC 27602
THANK YOU!


INFO@ROYCOOPER.COM | PRIVACY POLICY

Cooper for North Carolina
PO Box 1190
Raleigh, NC 27602
United States

PAID FOR BY COOPER FOR NORTH CAROLINA





RSN: FOCUS: Jeremy Stahl | Hear Me Out: Trump Won't Run Again

 

 

Reader Supported News
06 August 22

Live on the homepage now!
Reader Supported News

PLEASE DON’T WAIT FOR, “CONDITION DIRE” — The single biggest factor extending the length of these fundraising drives: Waiting until the situation is dire to chip in. If you can afford a donation, put it in the hat early. Sincere thanks to all.
Marc Ash • Founder, Reader Supported News

Sure, I'll make a donation!

 

Donald Trump. (photo: Erin Schaff/NYT/Redux)
FOCUS: Jeremy Stahl | Hear Me Out: Trump Won't Run Again
Jeremy Stahl, Slate
Stahl writes: "I don't think he'd win the 2024 Republican nomination, and I think he knows it."


I don’t think he’d win the 2024 Republican nomination, and I think he knows it.

After the 2016 election, I was hanging out with a group of friends discussing how badly the press had screwed up its predictions about Donald Trump’s chances at victory—seeing as how he had just won the presidency, despite the apparent odds.

One attendee, a fellow political journalist, came up with a particularly evocative metaphor for the situation. “It’s like we were weather reporters who told viewers that it was a sunny day to go to the beach, and instead there was a Category 4 hurricane,” he said.

To a certain extent, members of the national media have been trying to make up for this mistake for more than five years, seemingly vowing to themselves to never again underestimate this era’s “Teflon Don.” The notion among the media that Trump was bulletproof only grew as he seemed to escape accountability following a series of presidential scandals that included a calamitous initial version of his Muslim ban, the illegal and monstrous family separation policy, an obstruction of justice criminal probe, an impeachment over his blackmailing of Ukraine, and ultimately a second impeachment for inciting an insurrection on Jan. 6, 2021.

At every seemingly disastrous turn of his candidacy—and then his presidency—the media would speculate breathlessly on whether this was it, the breaking point of Trump’s political career, and then, it never was.

Famously, this dynamic—Trump seeming to have finally crossed some horrifying line to the point where he had to be held accountable, but ultimately facing no real consequences—was encapsulated on Twitter in October 2016, by the writer Jesse Farrar:

Well, I’d like to see ol Donny Trump wriggle his way out of THIS jam!

*Trump wriggles his way out of the jam easily*

Ah! Well. Nevertheless,

These days, it seems, no national reporter wants to be seen, once again, predicting ol’ Donny won’t be able to wriggle his way out of THIS jam. Those jams currently include continued unpopularity among the general electorate, falling support in the Republican Party, rising potential rivals in that party, public hearings that have exposed his extraordinary level of responsibility for the mob violence on Jan. 6, a civil case set to go to trial next year over an allegation that Trump committed rape, a civil investigation in New York that is pursuing allegations of fraudulent business practices against the Trump Organization, and a series of state and federal criminal investigations over Trump’s actions surrounding Jan. 6.

The point is that it should be easy to view Trump as an incredibly weakened figure who has better odds of ending up in an orange jumpsuit or losing his fortune in a lawsuit than returning to the White House. However, almost nobody in the national media seems to report it that way.

As a whole, I think the press corps is overcompensating for the trauma of our admittedly terrible 2016 prognostications by defaulting to what I call “ah, well, nevertheless” syndrome. Under the logic of “ah, well, nevertheless” syndrome, Trump’s wriggled out of so many prior jams that one would look foolish to predict he won’t wriggle out of his current ones. No political reporter wants that, especially when it comes to Trump.

I would argue, though, that Trump’s invincibility should have been viewed as broken once and for all following the 2020 election, which he lost decisively enough. It’s true Trump came close to winning in a handful of states—Georgia, Pennsylvania, Arizona, Wisconsin, and Michigan—three or four of which would have secured him the Electoral College and the presidency. He lost all five, though, and Hillary Clinton actually came closer than Trump to flipping the three states she needed to capture the presidency in 2016, by more than 25,000 votes.* (She too lost the presidency by a fairly decisive margin, which is why she conceded, like a sane person.)

More to the point, Trump became only the fourth elected incumbent in more than 125 years to lose the presidency, joining such illustrious company as George H.W. Bush, Jimmy Carter, and Herbert Hoover. Indeed, Trump’s 4.4 percent margin of defeat was up there with men whom political watchers still consider to be historic failures. Trump lost the popular vote by a greater margin than Hubert Humphrey, Mitt Romney, Gerald Ford, and John Kerry. In terms of the share of the popular vote won, Trump did just 1.2 points better than Michael Dukakis, a man whose political career is synonymous with “loser.”

While, after the election, Trump mounted a weekslong attempt to remain in power through false claims of fraud, that effort was laughed out of court in nearly every single case he and his allies brought. In the end, he sparked an insurrection that (admittedly, only briefly) turned the nation against him further, and then became the first president in history to be impeached twice by the House of Representatives. While Trump was not convicted, with the Senate falling short by 10 votes after he had already been removed from office by the voters, more senators from his own party voted to convict him in that second impeachment than any other president in history. Now he faces a series of state and federal criminal probes for his actions that led to that impeachment, which are by all reported accounts heating up dramatically.

Still, reports that Trump says he has “decided” to run again in 2024 are treated as breaking news, even as he’s been saying the same thing for more than a year. Indeed, he’s been telling this to anyone who will listen—and has been since he was dragged out of office literally thrashing and screaming 18 months ago. (That includes, ghoulishly, a group of first responders at an event commemorating the 20th anniversary of 9/11, where he said, “For me, it’s an easy question. … I know what I’m going to do. … I think you’re going to be happy, let me put it that way. I think you’re going to be very happy.”)

Personally, I don’t think Donald Trump is going to win the presidency in 2024. I don’t even think he’s going to win the Republican nomination. In fact, I don’t think he’s going to run for president, not really. Maybe I’ll deeply regret writing this once Trump returns to power and locks up members of the press in defamation gulags at Gitmo, or maybe this will just be the kind of embarrassing headline that haunts me the rest of my professional life. But—as far as I see it—Donald Trump’s career as a realistic candidate for major office is over.

There are a several reasons I’m willing to break free from my own severe bout of “ah, well, nevertheless” syndrome to say this.

First, I take seriously the civil and criminal probes Trump is facing between now and the time our next president is elected. Two weeks ago, it was revealed that Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis sent “target letters” to people involved in Trump’s efforts to overturn the election, signaling to the recipients that they are potentially facing indictment. Last week, there was news that a DOJ grand jury is looking at Trump’s actions related to a scheme to use “false electors” to overturn the election on Jan. 6. This week, we learned Trump’s own former White House counsel Pat A. Cipollone has been subpoenaed by a federal grand jury investigating Trump’s actions surrounding Jan. 6.

Even if Trump doesn’t go on trial for crimes related to Jan. 6, his associates are facing possible criminal culpability and direct scrutiny that could land them in jail or cause them to testify against the former president in other forums, keeping the president’s misdeeds in the news indefinitely. Trump and his children are also facing depositions in a civil probe in New York that will drag them further into the legal morass. Last month, meanwhile, a February date was set for a likely explosive defamation trial involving E. Jean Carroll’s allegation that Trump raped her, an event that could make the coverage around the Depp-Heard trial look like a small story.

Of course, it’s been reported that one reason Trump is considering running is to help escape his legal woes. A wise lawyer would tell him that won’t work. It also has the potential to backfire: Trials are strictly run things with rules enforced by judges with the power to hold people in contempt of court, lock them up, and fine them almost infinitely. If Trump uses a presidential campaign as a way to attack prosecutors or judges involved in criminal or civil cases against him, there’s nothing stopping a judge from placing a firm gag order around what the candidate can say publicly about the trial so as not to taint the jury pool—or even revoking bail if Trump faces criminal charges and disobeys such a gag order. This should be a major motivation against running.

But my second reason for thinking Trump won’t run is that there are numerous financial incentives in the other direction—including one big one tied to Trump’s legal woes. That is: The Republican National Committee continues to pay his sizable legal fees and has said it will only do so if he is not a candidate for president, as it “has to stay neutral” in any contested Republican primary. You see, paying for a candidate’s legal bills would break that neutrality. And there’s another financial incentive for Trump to hold off on declaring his candidacy, which is that if he becomes an official candidate for president, he loses control of all but $5,000 of the more than $100 million war chest he has stockpiled in the Save America PAC.

The third reason I doubt a Trump candidacy will actually materialize is that even as he remains the most popular figure in the Republican Party, there are many, many signs GOP voters are already starting to want something different in 2024. According to a recent NYT-Siena poll, Trump’s national polling share of the total vote in a widely contested primary is under 50 percent, with his closest rival, Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis, rising up to 25 percent. Another recent Suffolk University–USA Today poll found DeSantis actually leads Trump when GOP voters’ first and second choices are combined. So, if the Republican field were to narrow quickly enough—unlike what happened during the 2016 Republican primary—DeSantis would currently have the advantage over Trump. Perhaps more importantly, there have been a number of state polls showing DeSantis ahead of Trump, including in the home state of both men—the critical early primary state Florida—as well as in the first-in-the-nation-primary state of New Hampshire.

Further signals that GOP primary voters—and the party elites—will crave something new in 2024 abound. They include: a recent set of focus group surveys published in the Atlantic showing Trump voters cooling to a 2024 candidacy; editorials by the very conservative editorial boards of two Rupert Murdoch–controlled newspapers in recent days beseeching the party to move on from Trump in the wake of continued Jan. 6 revelations; numerous reports that GOP megadonors have stopped giving money to Trump and are turning to other candidates, with a focus on DeSantis; and a set of embarrassing primary defeats for Trump-endorsed candidates in key swing states.

My final reason for not believing Trump will mount a serious candidacy for the presidency in 2024? I think that deep down Trump knows he lost in 2020 and that there are decent odds he will lose again in 2024. Being tarnished as a two-time loser would be too devastating to his psyche to risk it.

Admittedly, I do not have any personal insight into Trump World. I’m not the only one, though, who has made this argument. In November, former Trump national security adviser John Bolton made a firm prediction that Trump would not run in 2024. “He knows deep inside, although he will never admit it, he did lose in 2020 and very much fears losing in 2024, because if he hates anything in the world, he hates being called a loser,” Bolton said. “He will talk about running incessantly until the very last moment because if he were ever to say he was not going to be a candidate, it would turn the spotlight off, and he doesn’t like that either.”

Another Trump adviser, former White House chief of staff John Kelly, also gave a rendition of this calculus last year, predicting, “He’ll continue talking about it. He may even declare, but he will not run. And the reason is he simply cannot be seen as a loser.”

This is my view as well. He may say out loud, “I am a candidate for president,” at some point, but if he does I bet he will find an excuse to pull the plug on such a “candidacy” before the start of the primaries in early 2024 because of his fear of being branded a loser. As the Washington Post’s Philip Bump cleverly put it, Trump does not want to be seen as “the Buffalo Bills of the presidential popular vote.”

The rebuttal to this from others who watch politics for a living is pretty straightforward and compelling: Trump denied the reality that he lost the last election; won’t he just declare himself the winner of the next one no matter what happens and say he was cheated because of “fraud” even if he loses? Yes, Trump can do that—and, if I’m proved wrong and he runs and loses, he certainly will. But such claims will be a lot harder to make if he runs in the Republican primary and loses a GOP nomination. If that were to happen, yes, Trump would claim fraud and likely tear the GOP apart at the seams. But doing so would utterly wreck his cherished place as a hero of Republican voters, and is that something he really wants to risk as a cherry on top of the label of becoming the first former president in modern primary history to seek and lose his party’s nomination for the White House?

To me, Trump will be a politically crippled figure heading into the 2024 primary. At his most dangerous, he will be a political albatross hanging around the neck of the Republican Party, tearing it apart.

Perhaps history will repeat itself. Trump will run again, crush a split Republican field as he did in 2016, and claim the White House, or maybe lose but still bring us to the brink of another coup. Maybe, though, others in the media will also begin to shed their “ah, well, nevertheless” syndromes as Trump continues to look weaker and weaker and his legal woes mount and mount. We should have our answers soon enough.



READ MORE

Special Coverage: Ukraine, A Historic Resistance
READ MORE

 

Contribute to RSN

Follow us on facebook and twitter!

Update My Monthly Donation

PO Box 2043 / Citrus Heights, CA 95611







Kyrsten Sinema won a big victory for hedge funds

 



Kyrsten Sinema, a Senator who took a paid internship at a billionaire hedge fund manager’s winery while in office, threw a tantrum over the possibility that hedge fund managers might have to pay just a tiny bit more taxes.

According to her statement, she made a deal last night because Democratic leadership agreed not to close a tax loophole for her hedge fund donors.

While she does the rounds on TV congratulating herself, don’t lose sight of what happened here.

She was willing to tank a plan to lower drug prices, invest in clean energy, and more — all because a few billionaires told her to.

Is that the best we can expect from our democracy?

We refuse to accept that as our fate.

Pitch in now to help Our Revolution elect progressives who care about Americans more than they do about lining their own pockets! If we keep electing corrupt corporate Dems like Sinema, we will never get real change.

In solidarity,

Paco








Support Our Revolution →

        
Our Revolution is a national grassroots network of local groups dedicated to organizing a political revolution powerful enough to challenge the structural forces that threaten our survival as a society. From city halls to the halls of Congress, our movement is fighting to win progressive issue fights, elect progressive champions, transform the Democratic party and get big money out of politics. Help us achieve these goals by donating today.

Join our movement by following us on Facebook and signing up here.


PAID FOR BY OUR REVOLUTION
PO Box 66208
WASHINGTON, DC, 20035

Not authorized by any candidate or candidate committee. Our Revolution is a 501(c)(4) organization. Donations to Our Revolution are not deductible as charitable contributions for Federal income tax purposes. All donations are made to support Our Revolution’s general mission and are not designated for any specific activity.





The GOP just tried to kick hundreds of students off the voter rolls

    This year, MAGA GOP activists in Georgia attempted to disenfranchise hundreds of students by trying to kick them off the voter rolls. De...