Showing posts with label FINES. Show all posts
Showing posts with label FINES. Show all posts

Thursday, February 22, 2024

Marjorie Taylor Greene Forced To Pay HUGE Fines After Supreme Court Smackdown

 



Marjorie Taylor Greene, along with several other Republican lawmakers, received devastating news from the Supreme Court this week when they were told that they had to pay the fines they had racked up for violating the House's mask mandate policy. Greene herself had received more than $100,000 in fines for violating the rules, and she begged the Supreme Court to reverse the penalties, but this week they refused. Farron Cousins explains what happened.


Friday, February 19, 2021

California investor who donated nearly $1M to Trump inauguration sentenced to 12 years in prison


California investor who donated nearly $1M to Trump inauguration

sentenced to 12 years in prison

 

A Federal Judge in California on Thursday sentenced a venture capitalist who donated nearly $1 million to former President Donald Trump's inaugural committee to 12 years in prison for falsifying records to hide his work as a foreign agent while lobbying high-level U.S. officials.

Imaad Zuberi was also fined $1.75 million and ordered to pay $15.7 million in restitution.

Zuberi, 50, agreed to plead guilty in 2019 to tax evasion, filing false foreign agent registration records and providing almost $1 million in illegal campaign contributions to various presidential election campaigns and other candidates for elected office, according to the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Central District of California.

​He previously donated to a host of Republican and Democratic politicians, including former Democratic presidential contender Hillary Clinton in 2015, Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., in 2014, then-California Attorney General Kamala Harris in 2015, and former President Barack Obama's presidential re-election campaign in 2011.

"The violations were part of a larger surreptitious effort to route foreign money into U.S. elections and to use it to corrupt U.S.policy-making processes," Federal prosecutors said in a court filing. They added "the court should reject Zuberi's characterization that illegal foreign interference and by funneling money to influence US policymaking and elections was the 'way America works."

​Prosecutors say Zuberi solicited foreign nationals and representatives of foreign governments, claiming he could use his influence in Washington to alter U.S. foreign policy and open up business opportunities for his clients.

Zuberi went to great lengths to pull off his scheme — hiring lobbyists, retaining public relations professionals and making campaign contributions — and in the process gained access to high-level U.S. officials, according to federal prosecutors.

​Illegal money was funneled from foreign entities over five years between 2012 and 2016, prosecutors said. Officials have not reveal the source of the $900,000 that Zuberi donated to the Trump inaugural committee in December 2016.

Zuberi not only solicited help from members of the House of Representatives, but members of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee and other powerful politicians as well, prosecutors said.

Download the NBC News app for breaking news and politics

​In one instance, using money supplied by a person described in the court filing as "Person J," Zuberi paid a former high-ranking U.S. military official over $150,000 to travel twice to Bahrain, meet with Bahraini officials to demonstrate Person J’s influence in the United States, and participate in an April 29, 2013, publicity stunt in which Avenue Ventures supposedly acquired a 35 percent stake in Al Areen. The stunt consisted of an event in Los Angeles at which Person J and a representative of Avenue Ventures purportedly attended.

​In addition, to the other schemes, prosecutors say that Zuberi received a $1 million payment from indicted Ukrainian oligarch Dmytro Firtash in March of 2015.

“Mr. Zuberi flouted federal laws that restrict foreign influences upon our government and prohibit injecting foreign money into our political campaigns. He enriched himself by defrauding his clients and evading the payment of taxes,” said Tracy Wilkinson, acting U.S. attorney for the Central District of California. “Today’s sentence, which also accounts for Mr. Zuberi’s attempt to obstruct an investigation into his felonious conduct, underscores the importance of our ongoing efforts to maintain transparency in U.S. elections and policy-making processes.”

Zuberi's lawyers declined to comment on Thursday's sentencing.



LINK


Image: Imaad Zuberi,Thomas O'Brien
Imaad Zuberi, from left, leaves the federal courthouse with his attorney Thomas O'Brien, from right, in Los Angeles on Nov. 22, 2019.Brian Melley / AP file



Monday, August 31, 2020

Eight groups at casino fined for gatherings

 


Eight groups at casino fined for gatherings




At least eight groups have been evicted from Encore Boston Harbor and fined for violating prohibitions on large gatherings in hotel rooms and other guests have opted to cancel their reservations when told at the front desk that the casino would strictly enforce rules of its own that are more strict than the state limits, gaming regulators said Thursday.

The Massachusetts Gaming Commission got a full rundown of the events at the Everett resort casino late on Saturday, Aug. 16 and into the early hours of Sunday, Aug. 17, when more than 110 mostly-unmasked people were kicked out of a suite at 3 a.m., triggering a disorderly conduct charge for the man who booked the suite and a notice of non-compliance for the casino.

Under Gov. Charlie Baker’s limit, no indoor gathering can exceed 25 people. Encore is now enforcing its own limit on gathering limits for guests in its hotel -- no more than four people to a hotel room and no more than 10 people allowed in a suite -- by making violators subject to a fine in the range of $3,000, commission officials said.

“In light of recent events at Encore Boston Harbor, I wish to remind all that the MGC’s jurisdiction and regulatory responsibilities extend to the entire gaming establishment, beyond the gaming floor. It’s imperative that we take all necessary steps to enforce social distancing and all other COVID-19-related measures as outlined in the reopening safety guidelines approved by the Gaming Commission,” Chairwoman Cathy Judd-Stein said.

She added, “To put it plainly, the stakes are too high for anything but full compliance with those safety standards.” Commissioners did not take action against Encore on Thursday, but regulatory staff explained the timeline of the well-publicized incident and the steps that the commission and casino have taken since then.

Interim Executive Director Karen Wells said a man who booked the suite on Aug. 16 and another person began “frequently” escorting small groups of people from the lobby up to the suite beginning at around 6:30 p.m. By midnight, hotel management had received a call from a person who said they saw a post on Instagram that showed more than 100 people in an Encore Boston Harbor suite, she said.

About 15 minutes later, a hotel butler told the front desk that he had just delivered something to the suite and saw more than 30 people inside. The butler told the desk “to clear up the party for violating the maximum hotel occupancy,” Wells said. At 12:30 a.m., the front desk called the suite to notify the guests of the occupancy limit and to give them 15 minutes to clear out the suite. At that time, Wells said, 36 people left the suite.

There was a reported disturbance at about 3 a.m., Wells said, which got Encore security and the Massachusetts State Police Gaming Enforcement Unit to respond. That’s when more than 110 people, most of them not wearing a mask or facecovering, were kicked out of the suite, Wells said. The 3 a.m. disturbance was the first time the casino’s security team became aware of the situation that the front desk dealt with.

An investigation into the situation led to a notice of non-compliance with required changes to Encore last week, Wells said. Judd-Stein highlighted that while commissioners and regulators generally agreed that Encore was taking the situation seriously and handling it appropriately, “this is a very serious step.”

“What was most egregious in this instance was not simply the actions of the public ... but what was egregious here for me was that that happened and our licensee got notice over three hours and at least one employee, the butler, did exactly the right thing and went and notified his fellow employees to have action taken,” she said. The chairwoman added that Encore and the state’s other gaming licensees need to “make sure they are hearing their employees when they hear reports of instances that put others at harm.”

Among the commission’s requirements for Encore was that the casino clearly communicates the state limits and the casino’s own restrictions to guests, that the company train employees to identify red flags like frequent entries or exits from a room and raise those to higher-ups, and that security staff more closely monitor hotel floors and the elevator lobbies to make sure only registered guests are accessing hotel rooms.

“This kind of flouting of these safety measures is unacceptable to the property and they have put significant action and resources behind it,” Investigations and Enforcement Bureau Deputy Director Loretta Lillios said, adding that the casino had already begun to implement many of the commission’s requirements by the time the commission sent the notice of non-compliance.

The more explicit communication of the rules and fines, as well as increased monitoring of social media for chatter about parties at the casino, has deterred others, Lillios and IEB Assistant Director Bruce Band.

“There was a big change at Encore over this past weekend. They were extremely vigilant in their duties. What we saw is not only guests change their mind about their weekend registration at the desk when they found out the new rules, but through their vigilance, eight different rooms were evicted for breaking those rules and fined as well,” Band said. “So Encore seems to be holding fast to their new rules and really sticking to their guns as far as to what they are trying to get the guests to abide by. I was impressed with this because that’s not easy to do with your loyal guests, per se.”



Thursday, July 23, 2020

Bob’s Tire Company in New Bedford fined over $58,000 for health and safety violations




Bob’s Tire Company in New Bedford fined over $58,000 for health and safety violations


By Kiernan Dunlap
Posted Jul 22, 2020


NEW BEDFORD - Last month, Bob’s Tire Company in the near North End was cited by the Occupational Health and Safety Administration for four serious safety violations and one repeat and two serious health violations, resulting in proposed penalties of over $58,000.
The company was opened for two inspections, one safety and one health, on Feb. 6 of this year, according to Ted Fitzgerald, the regional director for public affairs for the U.S. Department of Labor, and was cited for the violations on June 22.
The safety inspection resulted in $35,624 in proposed penalties and the health inspection resulted in $22,554 in proposed penalties, according to Fitzgerald.
Fitzgerald said Bob’s Tire Company participated in an informal conference with OSHA last week to discuss the citation and penalties and seek to resolve the matter, but the matter was not resolved and Bob’s Tire Company had until close of business on July 22 to settle or contest the citation and penalties.
Bob’s Tire Company said they had no comment about the OSHA citations and penalties.
The safety violations included multiple instances where employees were at risk of being struck by something; piles of shredded rubber being stacked in piles greater than 20 feet without protection to prevent collapse into the employee work area; a tractor being used to move trailers without an audible back-up alarm; employees walking and working in an area where dump trucks, tractor trailers, wheel loaders, and other heavy equipment was being operated without a traffic control plan; and wheel loaders being used with snow plow attachments that were not authorized by the manufacturer for pushing used tires around the yard where employees were walking and working.
Employees were also exposed to getting caught in a conveyor while they received used tires from the ground since it had a gap of greater than three inches between the roller and the wall, according to OSHA’s citations.
The health violations included an oxygen gas cylinder that was not secured and subject to being knocked over, a broken air dryer in the employee’s toilet facility with no other means to dry hands being provided, and directions of travel to the exits were not apparent in the sections of the second floor such as the tire painting and drying area, rack area, and welding area, and adjacent tire conveyor belt area.
Councilor-at-large Ian Abreu submitted the citation and penalties documents related to the health violations to the City Council last Thursday to be received and placed on file.
Abreu said on the phone Tuesday that he wanted the documents to be placed on file so constituents in abutting neighborhoods and city residents in general are made aware of what the federal findings on the property were and what the recommended course of action was to address those issues.
“Hopefully the management company will take heed to the recommendations and address those concerns that were set by federal laws and guidelines and I hope that we won’t have any issues going forward,” Abreu said.
This isn’t the first time City Council has called attention to Bob’s Tire Company, in February Councilor-at-large Brian Gomes and Ward 3 Councilor Hugh Dunn requested that the Committee on Public Safety and Neighborhoods meet with officials from local city departments to discuss local residents’ complaints of a foul odor and runoff water from the site where the shredding of tires is occurring.
The councilors also requested the committee look into the permissions the company had to shred tires at its location on Brook Street and asked that if the company had any code violations that the tire shredding be halted immediately.
According to Gomes, those motions are still in committee.
On June 11, Ward 5 Councilor Scott Lima, along with Abreu and Council President Joseph Lopes, also bought a motion before the City Council requesting that the Inspectional Services Commissioner, Environmental Stewardship Director, and Health Director appear before the Special Committee on Environmental Affairs, to provide a written report detailing the business name and location of all tire storage and tire recycling facilities within the city with a determination as to whether or not each tire facility is in compliance with the city’s planning and zoning regulations and environmental protocols. 
The motion was referred to the Special Committee on Environmental Affairs.
Gomes said on Wednesday that he brought safety and environmental concerns at the company to light after visiting the facility.
“I expected them to be in violation,” Gomes said in reaction to the OSHA violations. “There was no way that would be permitted in a residential neighborhood, that’s no surprise to me.”
Gomes said as soon as the committee is able, they are still going to call in Bob’s Tire Company because he doesn’t believe it belongs in a thickly settled residential area and said the committee will be looking into the company’s permitting and how they established themselves in that location to begin with.
Ward 2 Councilor Maria Giesta said she has received calls from her constituents about the property, which abuts her ward, and said she was glad that OSHA has gone after them and imposed these fines.
“We really have to keep an eye on Bob’s Tire Company and companies like it to make sure they don’t continue to abuse environmental laws and keep an eye out for our residents across the city, not just in Ward 3” Giesta said.
Giesta referenced a specific incident over the winter when the Department of Public Infrastructure and New Bedford Fire Department were at Bob’s Tire Company on what she said was a consistent basis to take care of a fire that was burning.
Gomes also referenced the fire saying that it resulted in “water and everything running down the streets it was just a total mess.”
OSHA did look into the fire, according to the records Abreu put on file with the City Council, and found that there was not sufficient evidence found for the company to be cited with respect to employee exposure to toxic combustion products from burning rubber by responding to a fire that occurred on Jan. 13.
However, OSHA did recognize the potential hazards associated with responding to fires and sent Bob’s Tire Company recommendations on voluntary protective measures they can take to protect their employees who respond to fires.
This is not Bob’s Tire Company’s first run-in with OSHA, in September 2004 the company was fined more than $45,000 after an investigation revealed 34 “serious violations”of workplace health and safety standards and in 2017 union organizers that had formed a picket line were handing out fliers detailing then-recent OSHA violations that totaled a proposed fine of $100,000.











🚨Susan Collins JUST GOT BURIED…

                 LOTS OF POSTS IGNORED BY BLOGGER..... OR REMOVED ON THEIR WHIM! ALL POSTS ARE AVAILABLE ON MIDDLEBORO REVIEW AND SO ON BLOG...