Showing posts with label PAM BONDI ELECTION DENIER. Show all posts
Showing posts with label PAM BONDI ELECTION DENIER. Show all posts

Thursday, November 28, 2024

Who Will Be the Heroes Now?

 

Forwarded this email? Subscribe here for more

Why subscribe? Note the kind words of one new paid subscriber, Lori: We all need to hear the truth and the corporate media is not delivering.” And this from Susanna: "I need another Substack sub like a hole in the head, but yours is good.”



Who Will Be the Heroes Now?

It's not enough to worry about the coming danger. We need to pay attention to and support the opposition

(Photo by Ted Horowitz Photography via Getty Images)

This is a strange, in-between moment, rippling with uncertainty stirred by a deeply vengeful man bent on destruction who will soon retake the ultimate levers of power. His hasty dumping of unqualified nominees—each one providing a different version of reckless endangerment to our nation’s safety and security—underscores the serious questions about how bad the coming months and years will be.

Will they mete out punishments to serve their boss’ whims, ending justice as we know it? Will we be able to rely on the safety of our food and water and drugs? Will diseases long abated by vaccines re-emerge as new and unnecessary dangers to our children and ourselves? Can we trust that our military will serve the American people rather than be transformed into a weapon against us? Will we face new attacks by foreign adversaries because our allies can no longer safely share intelligence with us? Will we suffer serious economic decline fueled by billionaires and reckless ideologues focused on expanding their own fortunes while demanding sacrifices from everyone else? Can we be sure that in 2026 there will be another election?

In turn, who will be the heroes of this time? Who will stand up and speak out, refusing to be cowed or ruled by fear? Who will take action to stop the demolition of our democracy? Who with power will demand that the practices and principles that have successfully driven the American system of government be recognized and followed?

There are some early signs: Matt Gaetz was a road too far for Attorney General. The Senate chose South Dakota’s John Thune as its new majority leader, not Trump-backed lickspittle Rick Scott from Florida. Jerome Powell, chairman of the Federal Reserve, said categorically that he would not leave his post if Trump asked or tried to fire him. Alaska’s Republican Sen. Lisa Murkowski announced she would oppose Trump’s nominees if they are not properly vetted by the FBI. “This isn’t about partisanship," she reportedly told close allies, "it’s about ensuring we don’t compromise the standards of public office." South Dakota’s other GOP senator, Mike Rounds, said this when asked about anti-vaxxer Robert F. Kennedy Jr.: “Look, I believe in vaccines. I think they’ve saved millions of lives.”

Will there be other GOP senators who find their spine in the coming months to confront Trump’s reckless decisions? Will we see Democrats oppose the coming onslaught with all the vigor and virulence they can muster? These would be leaders to notice and encourage.

Let’s also pay attention to the critical role of state and local officials to protect their citizens and push back against the Trump-inspired federal efforts to deport millions of undocumented migrants and pursue myriad other actions that will cause damage to real people. Illinois Gov. J.B. Pritzker best summarized this commitment: “You come for my people, you come through me.”

In this period, we will need fearless truth-tellers to remind us of the differences between right and wrong, true and false. They will be critical in asserting factual reality as the anti-government propaganda intensifies to justify extreme attacks on the agencies, procedures and resources established to create safety and security, particularly for at-risk people. Trump lackey and election denier Pam Bondi, nominated for Attorney General, has already pledged to prosecute the prosecutors.

Trump chose Russell Vought, a chief architect of Project 2025, to lead the Office of Management and Budget, even though Trump said he knew nothing about the project’s policy agenda. Vought has already pledged to help impound any funds approved by Congress if the next president disapproves of their intended purpose—demonstrating utter disregard for the legislative body’s power of the purse enshrined in the first article of the Constitution.

Let’s rewind for a moment: Since FDR’s New Deal and LBJ’s Great Society, liberal government has sought to minimize suffering—indeed to provide a bulwark against decline, destitution and death—with programs like Social Security and Medicare for the elderly, Medicaid and food stamps for the poor, Head Start for low-income children. As much as these efforts represented a belief that government can make lives better, they also recognized that the capitalist system’s turbulence and inequality can and must be tempered.

Now, as Trump is inserting an increasingly power-mad billionaire like Elon Musk along with Vivek Ramaswamy to manage a made-up Department of Government Efficiencywith their promise to slash $2 trillion from the federal budget of just over $6 trillion—do we have any reason to believe their cuts (whatever the eventual scale) will serve the same people that FDR and LBJ recognized needed support? Or will Musk, one of the largest private government contractors and the world’s richest man, make decisions that serve his own interests? Tragically, we will soon get an answer to this not-rhetorical question.

We should not doubt that there are plenty of fellow billionaires—aided by a corrupt Supreme Court—who are cheering on additional tax cuts to increase their wealth, consolidate power among private interests and move the country toward oligarchy. The Republican nominee who conned voters into believing he cares about working people is now seeking to surround himself with billionaires, including Doug Burgum (Interior), Linda McMahon (Education) and Howard Lutnick (Commerce), along with Musk and Ramaswamy.

Who will be the heroes? Let’s pay attention to the government professionals who push back against the reckless savaging of their departments, the elected officials who speak out on behalf of working people, the judges and prosecutors and lawyers who resist the ravaging of our election systems and constitutional processes, the scientists and medical professionals who resist the measures that will endanger the nation’s health, the everyday people who refuse to be lied to or let their neighbors and friends be endangered. This is where we’ll find not just hope, but the makings of a positive future once this hostile takeover reaches its eventual dead end.

Saturday, November 23, 2024

Kamala winning 2028 primary, Trump victory margin shrinks

 

Forwarded this email? Subscribe here for more

Kamala winning 2028 primary, Trump victory margin shrinks

The David Pakman Show - November 22, 2024

Nov 22

Listen to today's show

This installment of The David Pakman Show newsletter is free for everyone. I send these daily. If you’d like to receive it, join the newsletter today.
Note: This is totally separate from website Membership and does not affect your website Membership in any way.


Matt Gaetz bails on attorney general nomination

Matt Gaetz’s nomination for Attorney General collapsed following allegations of a second sexual encounter with a 17-year-old, forcing him to step down. Trump issued a vague statement praising Gaetz but quickly pivoted to nominate Pam Bondi as his replacement. Gaetz’s resignation has sparked confusion, with questions about whether he might still serve in Congress since he was recently reelected. This turmoil reflects broader issues within the Republican Party which can’t get on the same page ahead of Trump’s second administration.

SHRINKAGE: Trump's victory shrivels into a tiny embarrassment

Donald Trump’s 2024 victory, touted as a landslide, is far from a true mandate. His margin has shrunk to 1.6 percentage points and 2.5 million votes, smaller than Hillary Clinton’s 2016 popular vote win. Despite lacking a majority, Republicans use this narrative to justify controversial policies and appointments. Critics note the hypocrisy, as Republicans dismissed Barack Obama’s much larger victories while demanding deference to Trump’s narrow win. This lack of a clear majority highlights the need to resist an agenda unsupported by most Americans.

From yesterday’s show:

OOPS: JD Vance PANIC DELETES disastrous tweet

J.D. Vance faced backlash after accidentally revealing that Donald Trump was considering firing FBI Director Christopher Wray, a detail that hadn't been made public. Vance's tweet, which criticized Grace Chong for calling him out over his absence during a vote, also hinted at Trump's plans to hire a new FBI director who would dismantle the "Deep State." The tweet caused immediate blowback, leading Vance to delete it. This incident, along with other transition-related chaos, suggests that Trump's second term could be even more tumultuous than his first.

From yesterday’s show:

Nikki Haley SLAMS Trump's Tulsi pick, but SHE'S TO BLAME

Nikki Haley criticized Donald Trump’s nomination of Tulsi Gabbard as Director of National Intelligence, citing Gabbard’s controversial stances, such as siding with adversaries like Russia and Iran and her defense of Bashar al-Assad. While Haley’s critique is fact-based, it ignores her own role in enabling Trump by endorsing him despite previously calling him unfit. Critics argue Haley and other Republicans share blame for Trump’s controversial decisions, including this nomination. Her failure to acknowledge this complicity undermines her otherwise strong analysis of Gabbard’s flaws.

More on the show:

-- Polls show Kamala Harris leading the pack for possible Democratic presidential candidates in 2028

-- Defense Secretary nominee Pete Hegseth gets confronted by a reporter about whether he committed sexual assault

-- Nancy Mace introduces a bathroom bill in response to Sarah McBride’s election as the first transgender member of Congress

-- House Speaker Mike Johnson won't answer if Sarah McBride is a man or a woman

-- Donald Trump appoints Dr. Oz to lead Medicare and Medicaid

-- Trump appoints Linda McMahon for Secretary of Education

-- The Friday Feedback segment

-- On the Bonus Show: Pam Bondi chosen for Attorney General, and much more...

-- Become a Member: https://www.davidpakman.com/membership

Which Trump Cabinet Pick Alarms You the Most?

 

Forwarded this email? Subscribe here for more

Why subscribe? Note the kind words of one new paid subscriber, Lori: We all need to hear the truth and the corporate media is not delivering.” And this from Susanna: "I need another Substack sub like a hole in the head, but yours is good.”



Three of Trump’s dangerous picks: RFK Jr., Pete Hegseth and Tulsi Gabbard (Photos via Getty Images)

It’s hard to overstate the recklessness of the selections made by Donald Trump to “lead” his administration. One after another, his nominations don’t represent a genuine desire to govern, but a plan to dismantle the institutions and the agencies of government that have built America’s modern democratic system and way of life. They look like the result of an angry child’s desire to break things at all cost, no matter the extent or the nature of the damage to a country of nearly 350 million people. Or, maybe worse, they represent the potential for destruction from inside that even Russian president Vladimir Putin couldn’t expect was possible. Talk about “the enemy within”—it’s always projection with Trump. Soon we’ll see whether there are enough U.S. Senators who still believe in their constitutional obligation to provide advice and consent and will reject some of the most egregious cases quickly and carelessly thrust upon us.

In some respects, though, these choices don’t appear mindlessly chosen. It’s hard to miss the awful message that sexual misconduct—be it sex trafficking of minors, assaulting women or otherwise exploiting children—is not only not a reason for disqualification. Rather, given the number of nominees with accusations of abuse in their backgrounds, such allegations seem more like a desired attribute for the man found liable of sexual abuse and defamation, indeed rape. We can see with these picks that Trump, a longtime friend of Jeffrey Epstein and who self-confessed to assaulting women in the Access Hollywood recording, prefers to surround himself with people accused of sexual violence and to tell the country that this toxicity is acceptable.

These include: Matt Gaetz, who thankfully withdrew his nomination for Attorney General on Thursday; Pete Hegseth, Defense nominee, accused of sexually assaulting a woman in his hotel room in 2017 which was detailed in a released police report; Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., Health and Human Services nominee, accused of groping his teenaged babysitter; Linda McMahon, Education nominee, sued recently for knowingly enabling the sexual abuse and exploitation of children in the 1980s; as well as Elon Musk, who has been sued by former employees who were fired after complaining of sexual harassment and is charged by Trump to oversee a new entity focused on “government efficiency.”

Of course, the disqualifying issues range far wider. Let’s briefly consider just some of these selections that would endanger national security, undermine the reliable operations of needed bureaucracies and put the nation’s health at risk.

  • Pete Hegseth, the extremist Fox News host with zero experience managing a large organization, has said that he wants to remove women from combat and start firing some generals. Just this week, he appeared on a right-wing podcast asserting his desire for an “educational insurgency” to “build your army underground” and advance a Christian nationalist agenda. Not exactly the kind of careful talk one would expect from someone who wants to lead the Pentagon and serve a diverse military population of millions and their families.

  • Tulsi Gabbard, who has no experience serving in intelligence but Trump nominated her as Director of National Intelligence. What she does have is a track record of pushing pro-Russia propaganda, earning her the accolade of “our girlfriend” on Russian state television. While a congresswoman in 2017, Gabbard went to Syria, met with its authoritarian president, Bashar al-Assad, and later accused the U.S. of supporting terrorists there. The day after Putin invaded Ukraine in 2022, she blamed the U.S. and NATO for provoking the war—precisely the murderous Russian president’s talking points. Her ascendancy would put the life of every U.S. intelligence operative in danger and ensure that America’s democratic allies will resist sharing intelligence with America.

  • Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. is a notorious ani-vaxxer (dressed up as “skepticism”) and a conspiracy theorist who lacks any scientific or medical training, but Trump nominated him to be the Director of Health and Human Services (HHS). His skepticism toward vaccines and vaccination, his stated plan to cut fluoride in drinking water, his desire to shift away from the study of infectious diseases, his promise to cut funding and purge HHS staff—these are just some of the actions that will endanger the health and lives of millions of Americans.

There are many others to consider, including Trump sycophant and election denier Pam Biondi, who was quickly announced to replace Matt Gaetz for Attorney General; South Dakota governor and dog killer Kristi Noem as Homeland Security secretary; Dr. Mehmet Oz, the TV personality who has pushed misinformation about Covid treatments and weight-loss supplements, to run the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, which has a budget of over $1 trillion; and Russell Vought, a principal author of Project 2025 who is bent on dismantling “the woke and weaponized bureaucracy,” to direct the Office of Management and Budget.

Will there be sufficient outcry that some of these dangerous choices will either withdraw or be rejected by a small number of Republican senators who recognize their duty? That effort would be aided by the Biden-Harris administration if it does the work that Trump and his enablers won’t do: perform FBI background checks and properly vet these selections to inform the public.

What do you think? Which Trump cabinet pick alarms you the most? What dangers that lie ahead concern you the most? Do you have any optimism that there will be enough Republican senators who do the right thing? (Several have derided the failure to do FBI background checks.) And have you reached out to your own state’s senators?

As always, I look forward to reading your observations and the opportunity of this community to learn from each other. Please do be respectful in your remarks. Trolling will not be tolerated.


How Trump could use recess appointments

 


Friday, November 22

For $120/year, upgrade to our premium membership and support a pro-democracy news outlet dedicated to keeping you up to date on voting, elections and democracy in the courts.

How Trump could use recess appointments to undermine democracy

  • As some of President-elect Donald Trump's cabinet nominees provoke ire, Trump is considering using recess appointments to skirt Senate confirmation votes. How do recess appointments work? And is it a threat to democracy? Read here to learn the answers to these questions.

Casey concedes to McCormick in Pennsylvania Senate race

  • Pennsylvania ended its U.S. Senate recount after Sen. Bob Casey (D) conceded to David McCormick (R). A handful of lawsuits regarding ballot rejections in the race remain open as of Friday but may be withdrawn following Casey's concession.


  • “This race was one of the closest in our Commonwealth’s history, decided by less than a quarter of a point,” Casey said. “I am grateful to the thousands of people who worked to make sure every eligible vote cast could be counted, including election officials in all 67 counties.”

RNC dismisses challenge to Michigan’s expanded voter registration sites

  • The Republican National Committee voluntarily dismissed its lawsuit alleging that Michigan violated federal law by offering voter registration at Small Business Administration and Veterans Affairs offices.

Trump announces election denier Pam Bondi as new AG pick

  • Who is Pam Bondi, Trump's new pick for U.S. attorney general? The former Florida state AG defended the President-elect during his first impeachment trial, spread lies about the 2020 election and led a multi-state effort to overturn pro-voting policies. Read here to learn more.


  • Since 2021, Bondi has been the chair of the America First Policy Institute’s center for litigation and co-chair of its center for law and justice. Bondi has spearheaded the group’s efforts to disenfranchise voters around the country.


  • Trump announced Bondi just one day after his previous pick for attorney general, Matt Gaetz, withdrew his name from consideration, saying his nomination had become a “distraction.”

Bondi could lead Trump’s DOJ — here’s how it could affect voting rights

  • How will a Trump DOJ run by loyalists and possibly purged of career attorneys impact voting rights? Looking at its record during Trump’s first term could provide an indication of what’s to come.

Trump rips his own party in wild Memorial Day screed

  BLOGGER DIDN'T LIKE THIS POST -DON'T MISSS IT!     LOTS OF POSTS IGNORED BY BLOGGER..... OR REMOVED ON THEIR WHIM! ALL POSTS ARE A...