Showing posts with label SAM CARTER. Show all posts
Showing posts with label SAM CARTER. Show all posts

Friday, July 17, 2026

We Paid $800.000 For The Food Then $100.000 To Burn It

            

  LOTS OF POSTS IGNORED BY BLOGGER.....

OR REMOVED ON THEIR WHIM!

ALL POSTS ARE AVAILABLE ON

MIDDLEBORO REVIEW AND SO ON

BLOGGER DOESN'T LIKE TRUTH OR FACTS!

BLOGGER DOESN'T LIKE FUND RAISERS AND DELETES

POSTS THAT INCLUDE FUNDRAISING THAT 'VIOLATES THEIR

UNDEFINED COMMUNITY STANDARDS SO ALL 'FUND RAISING'

IS DELETED - CONTRIBUTE AS YOU ARE INCLINED TO SUPPORT

IMPORTANT ISSUES! THESE ARE NOT SOLICITATIONS





Sam Carter

2.18K subscribers


Jul 14, 2026
In May 2025, Sen. Patty Murray (D-WA) told Secretary of State Marco Rubio that 500 tons of emergency food — high-energy biscuits bought with American tax dollars — were sitting in a warehouse in Dubai, set to expire in July. Bought. Shipped. Stored. And condemned to waste. Rubio's response: "I disagree with like 99% of it. It's just not true. We've done nothing that's illegal." Two months later, the biscuits were incinerated. Here are the confirmed numbers. 496 metric tons — roughly $800,000 worth — expired in that Dubai warehouse and were destroyed. The State Department confirmed it. The food was meant for starving children in Afghanistan and Pakistan; it would have fed approximately 1.5 million children for a week. Burning it cost the American taxpayer roughly another $100,000 on top of what had already been spent. And here's the part that's hardest to get past: in June, aid officials managed to save 622 tons of the very same biscuits and shipped them to Syria, Bangladesh, and Myanmar. So it could be done. It just wasn't done for these. Rubio also told Congress there were "no State Department delays" in getting food aid out. The Washington Post's Fact Checker later awarded him four Pinocchios over a related claim about USAID cuts. Now — I'm not going to tell you Murray was right about everything, because she wasn't, and I'd rather be straight with you. On the legal question, it's messier than her speech suggested. She was right that in March 2025 the Supreme Court forced the administration to pay for work already completed. But in September 2025, the Supreme Court went the other way and allowed the administration to withhold $4 billion in foreign aid. Justice Kagan wrote a scathing dissent calling it a presidential usurpation of Congress's power — but the majority sided with the administration. So "outright illegal"? That was not the courts' final word. The State Department's defense on the food is also on the record: they say the expired lot was over-purchased under the previous administration, and that USAID has had to destroy expired commodities before, under other presidents. Weigh that for yourself. But you can argue about the Impoundment Control Act all day. You can't argue with an incinerator. That's why this channel goes back and checks. Anybody can win an argument in a hearing room. The receipts show up later. 👉 If you believe in accountability, SUBSCRIBE and turn on notifications. 👍 LIKE if this breakdown was useful. 💬 What's your take? Drop it in the comments — I read them. I'm Sam Carter. A Democrat, and proud of it. — Source footage: U.S. Senate Foreign Relations Committee hearing (public domain). Facts on the destroyed food aid as reported by CNN, Reuters, The Atlantic, and Al Jazeera, and confirmed by the U.S. State Department. Supreme Court rulings via SCOTUSblog and NBC News. This video is commentary for educational purposes.


Thursday, July 9, 2026

Larson Just Wanted A Straight Answer - Bessent Wouldn't Give One

                                                                    

LOTS OF POSTS IGNORED BY BLOGGER.....

OR REMOVED ON THEIR WHIM!

ALL POSTS ARE AVAILABLE ON

MIDDLEBORO REVIEW AND SO ON

BLOGGER DOESN'T LIKE TRUTH OR FACTS!

BLOGGER DOESN'T LIKE FUND RAISERS AND DELETES

POSTS THAT INCLUDE FUNDRAISING THAT 'VIOLATES THEIR

UNDEFINED COMMUNITY STANDARDS SO ALL 'FUND RAISING'

IS DELETED - CONTRIBUTE AS YOU ARE INCLINED TO SUPPORT

IMPORTANT ISSUES! THESE ARE NOT SOLICITATIONS



NEW POSTER: SIMPLE QUESTION SCOTT BESSENT REFUSED TO ANSWER!


Sam Carter

172 subscribers


Jul 9, 2026
It should have been a simple question. Rep. John Larson (D-CT) asked Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent a version of it five different ways: is the United States at war — and is that why Americans are paying more at the pump? What he got back was a word swap and a stack of talking points. Here's the context, and it's all on the record. Since February 2026, the U.S. has been militarily involved in a conflict with Iran. Iran shut down the Strait of Hormuz — the route for roughly a fifth of the world's oil — triggering the largest oil supply shock since the 1970s. Oil topped $100 a barrel, gas passed $5 a gallon in parts of the country, and by one estimate the cost to U.S. taxpayers has run past $113 billion. When Larson asked point-blank, "Are we at war?", Bessent reached for softer words — "the conflict has been halted" — and even offered to call the Secretary of War to check. To be fair, a ceasefire was in place, so "halted" isn't false. But Larson's frustration was about candor: when U.S. forces carry out strikes, a member of Congress asking a yes-or-no question deserves a yes or a no. I'll give you both sides here. Bessent made his case: core inflation down half a percent since Trump took office, food prices rising slower than under Biden, the gas spike "temporary," and the White House pushing to cut the gas tax — which Larson said he'd actually work on across the aisle. But Larson's counter was just as real: people in his district aren't "doing cartwheels," and rhetoric doesn't pay the grocery bill, the heating bill, or the gas tank. Two different realities — the spreadsheet and the kitchen table. Watch it and decide which one matches yours. This channel breaks down the hearings the news cycle moves past too fast. Ask the plain question. Follow the record. Hold power accountable — whoever's holding it. 👉 If you believe in accountability, SUBSCRIBE and turn on notifications. 👍 LIKE if this breakdown was useful. 💬 What's your take? Drop it in the comments — I read them. I'm Sam Carter. A Democrat, and proud of it. — Source footage: U.S. House Ways and Means Committee hearing (public domain). Facts on the Iran conflict and oil markets as reported by the IEA, the Congressional Research Service, Reuters, and CNBC. This video is commentary for educational purposes.




Wednesday Update: Camp Mar-a-David – 10/7/26

                            LOTS OF POSTS IGNORED BY BLOGGER..... OR REMOVED ON THEIR WHIM! ALL POSTS ARE AVAILABLE ON MIDDLEBORO REVIEW AND...