![]() | |
| |
UNDER CONSTRUCTION - MOVED TO MIDDLEBORO REVIEW AND SO ON https://middlebororeviewandsoon.blogspot.com/
![]() | |
| |
|
BOSTON – Legislators will vote Thursday to approve the same sweeping climate change bill that was vetoed by Gov. Charlie Baker two weeks ago.
Baker refused to sign the bill Jan. 15, citing concerns over the economic hardship higher emissions reductions could cause state residents and businesses. He was also skeptical that some renewable energy goals could be achieved, and said building-code changes in the bill would depress the industry and hamper efforts to build affordable housing.
“There is strong agreement from the governor with the Legislature’s goals to address climate change as aggressively as we can and maintain the leadership role we have had in Massachusetts,” Kathleen Theoharides, Secretary of Energy and Environmental Affairs, told the Times Tuesday.
Gov. Baker’s plan released on Dec. 30 was based on two years of analysis, she said, and set emissions goals based on science and cost-effectiveness.
Two weeks ago, Baker said the bill landed on his desk at the close of the last legislative session and left him no time to make amendments. It’s likely there will be amendments this time, but the House and Senate passed the climate bill by overwhelming majorities, enough to override amendments or the governor’s veto, should he use it.
“I am expecting a unanimous or near-unanimous vote again this week,” said State Rep. Sarah Peake, D-Provincetown, who thinks Baker will return the bill with amendments to the Legislature.
“At this time, I certainly have no appetite to take up any of his amendments that may slow down the implementation of this bill and slow us down in getting to net-zero (greenhouse gas emissions by 2050),” Peake said. “All of us who live here on the Cape see the realities of climate change happening before our very eyes. …There is a clear cost to not addressing climate change as quickly as possible.”
While there has been pointed criticism of Gov. Baker from legislators and environmentalists for not signing the climate change bill, it’s not like he’s a climate change denier.
Last month, his administration released its own plan to reach climate change goals that included a 45% reduction in greenhouse gas emissions by 2030 and net-zero emissions by 2050. This included retrofitting one million of the state’s 3 million homes to use electricity for heating and cooling, and electrifying the transportation sector, including the state fleet of 750,000 electric vehicles, by 2030. The state would also add 2,000 additional megawatts of renewable energy beyond what is already in the pipeline to power that change.
The Legislature’s bill, known as the Next-Generation Roadmap for Massachusetts Climate Policy, set more ambitious goals, including a target of 50% emissions reductions from 1990 levels and 75% by 2040, with status checks at five-year intervals.
It also boosted goals for offshore wind by 2,400 megawatts to a total of 5,600 megawatts. For context, the 800 megawatt Vineyard Wind utility-scale wind farm will generate enough electricity to power 400,000 homes and businesses.
The climate bill sets safety and accountability measures for the natural gas industry, including leaks and infrastructure, and environmental justice provisions for low- to middle-income communities that have suffered inequitably from climate change impacts and solutions.
One of the main points of contention is the 5% of additional emission reductions by 2030 in the Legislature’s bill, which is beyond what Baker proposed.
Theoharides said that while it seemed like a small amount, it actually required heavy lifting, including an additional 400,000 electric vehicles, a new low-carbon fuel standard 50% tougher than any in the U.S., completely eliminating petroleum-based fuel oil for heating and adding 2,000 megawatts in clean energy.
She said the Legislature’s higher emission reduction goal didn’t allow for homeowners and businesses to take advantage of stock rollover, naturally retiring old equipment. She estimated the higher emission target would cost $6 billion and would be borne by taxpayers, businesses, vehicle owners and homeowners.
Theoharides was also critical of the new building codes that require new structures to meet net-zero for emissions, while the governor’s proposal worked on making existing and new buildings as energy efficient as possible while preparing to switch to clean energy.
“It’s disappointing that the governor is nitpicking at the margins of legislation,” state Sen. Julian Cyr, D-Truro said. “It will cost the commonwealth, businesses (and) families money, but prior generations have kicked the can down the road and left us with the clearest of choices: We either take action or sentence my generation, my children’s generation, or our grandchildren to a future that is unlivable.”



David Correia
ASSOCIATED PRESSATTLEBORO — A former city man has apologized for conspiring with associates of Rudy Giuliani to bilk investors through a purported fraud-busting company and for lying to federal election officials.
“I regret what I did and I am sorry for it,” David Correia, 45, wrote in the letter to a federal judge in Manhattan that was among court papers filed Monday.
Correia pleaded guilty Oct. 29 to making false statements to the Federal Elections Commission about political contributions and conspiracy to commit wire fraud. He is scheduled to be sentenced Feb. 8 and faces about three years in prison, according to sentencing guidelines, which are not binding.
His lawyer, William Harrington of New York, is asking the judge to spare Correia from going to prison and said his client had no prior criminal history.
Federal prosecutors have not yet filed their sentencing memorandum to Judge J. Paul Oetken, but a prison sentence of 33 months to 41 months was stipulated in the plea agreement.
Correia, a 1993 graduate of Attleboro High School, now lives in West Palm Beach, Fla. with his wife and two children, ages 6 and 9.
In his sentencing memorandum, Harrington depicted Correia as a hard-working businessman and devoted husband and father who placed his trust in the wrong person.
Correia was in a business called Fraud Guarantee, headed by Giuliani associate Lev Parnas. The company was supposed to protect investors against fraud. But prosecutors say it had no clients and ripped off investors of $2.3 million.
While prosecutors said the company was a fraud, Harrington said Correia believed in it and trusted Parnas because he had a luxurious lifestyle and appeared to be successful.
“Mr. Correia was enamored by Mr. Parnas’s success,” Harrington wrote.
In his letter, Correia said he ignored “red flags” and advice to be wary of Parnas. However, he said he only blamed himself “for giving in on many subjects.”
As part of a plea agreement with prosecutors, Correia has agreed to pay $2.3 million in restitution to investors and forfeit $43,650.
Harrington said Corriea believed the company could have been successful and the $43,650 represents the all the money he received for his work in seven years.
In arguing that his client should be spared a prison sentence, Harrington said Corriea’s wife is the primary breadwinner as a physician’s assistant and he is the primary caretaker of the children.
“A period of incarceration will fracture his family and disrupt his children’s lives,” Harrington wrote.
The defense lawyer said Correia overcame a difficult childhood and his parents’ divorce to become a successful restaurant owner before going into business with Parnas.
A gifted golfer from the age of 12, Correia abandoned efforts to become a professional in order to help a friend who experienced some hard times, Harrington said.
Portions of the documents were redacted at Harrington’s request.
The cases against Parnas and the other defendants are still pending.
![]() |
|
LOTS OF POSTS IGNORED BY BLOGGER..... OR REMOVED ON THEIR WHIM! ALL POSTS ARE...