Tuesday, October 20, 2026

ICYMI: My first debate against John Sununu

                                                                                                                                                       

LOTS OF POSTS IGNORED BY BLOGGER.....

OR REMOVED ON THEIR WHIM!

ALL POSTS ARE AVAILABLE ON

MIDDLEBORO REVIEW AND SO ON

BLOGGER DOESN'T LIKE TRUTH OR FACTS!

BLOGGER DOESN'T LIKE FUND RAISERS AND DELETES

POSTS THAT INCLUDE FUNDRAISING THAT 'VIOLATES THEIR

UNDEFINED COMMUNITY STANDARDS SO ALL 'FUND RAISING'

IS DELETED - CONTRIBUTE AS YOU ARE INCLINED TO SUPPORT

IMPORTANT ISSUES! THESE ARE NOT SOLICITATIONS 



ICYMI: My first debate against John Sununu

What he won’t say on stage vs. what he says behind closed doors.


It’s Chris.

At our first debate on Tuesday, the moderator asked John Sununu a simple question: What is your specific proposal for saving Social Security? Here’s what he said:


He won’t say what his plan is because he knows how deeply unpopular it is. But Granite Staters know the truth: John Sununu was a leading architect of the scheme to privatize Social Security. Then at an AARP forum with Granite Staters, he would only say his old plan doesn’t fit today’s needs.

My answer is simple. People pay into Social Security their whole working lives, and they deserve to know it’ll be there when they retire. I’ll oppose any cuts to benefits, and I won’t tell anyone they have to work longer to get what they’ve already earned.

That wasn’t the only question Sununu dodged. When he was asked whether he would have voted to confirm Pete Hegseth, RFK Jr., and Kristi Noem, he said:

“I wouldn’t have voted for all three of those, and I’m not going to litigate each one of them.”

So he would have confirmed at least some of them, and he won’t tell you which ones. Hegseth was confirmed by a single tie-breaking vote. In the Senate one vote can decide who runs the Pentagon. Now the so-called Secretary of War almost livestreamed an execution. That madness could have been stopped by one Senator. But Sununu won’t tell us whether or not it would have been him.

This is the same John Sununu who cheered on Trump’s war in Iran, calling it a success. That war has sent New Hampshire’s energy prices to record highs. I’ve voted to end it, and I’ll keep fighting to rein it in.

And behind closed doors, John Sununu was caught on camera saying the quiet part out loud. He said this race “is important to President Trump’s agenda and to the successes that have been made in Washington.”

That’s who he’d be working for. He has Donald Trump’s endorsement and tens of millions of dollars in outside Republican money behind him. With 15 days until Election Day, they’re betting New Hampshire voters won’t notice what he refuses to say in public.

We’re going to make sure they do. But I need your help to keep our message on the air.


Thank you for being in this with me,

Chris

Before you go!

John Sununu’s megadonors have funneled over $60 million to flood the New Hampshire airwaves and drown out our message.

We can’t let Republicans buy this seat — our shot at a Democratic Senate majority depends on keeping the Granite State blue.

Will you chip in whatever you’re able to today to ensure we have the resources to fight back, elect Chris, and flip the Senate in just 15 days?

DONATE



Pakistan TB Deaths will Increase as USAID Funding Ends by Phil Pasquini 19 Mar 2025

                                                                                                                                                      

LOTS OF POSTS IGNORED BY BLOGGER.....

OR REMOVED ON THEIR WHIM!

ALL POSTS ARE AVAILABLE ON

MIDDLEBORO REVIEW AND SO ON

BLOGGER DOESN'T LIKE TRUTH OR FACTS!

BLOGGER DOESN'T LIKE FUND RAISERS AND DELETES

POSTS THAT INCLUDE FUNDRAISING THAT 'VIOLATES THEIR

UNDEFINED COMMUNITY STANDARDS SO ALL 'FUND RAISING'

IS DELETED - CONTRIBUTE AS YOU ARE INCLINED TO SUPPORT

IMPORTANT ISSUES! THESE ARE NOT SOLICITATIONS 



ARTICLE BELOW FROM COUNTERCURRENTS...NOTE THAT CURRENT 

ARTICLES ARE POSTED ON THE RIGHT SIDE OF THE ARTICLE.


Pakistan TB Deaths will Increase as USAID Funding Ends


On Friday, March 7 all tuberculosis (TB) related health activities were terminated in Pakistan and elsewhere as a result of President Trump’s January 20 executive order ending the $44 billion funding of United States Agency for International Development (USAID) and State Department projects for 90 days. The proclamation also called for all foreign service officers (FSO) in Pakistan to be placed on administrative leave.

According to the order, the administration will review each of the funded programs to decide how to move forward in considering whether to make changes, cancel or better “align” them with “Trump’s priorities.” The operative term being “priorities” that in Trump world change frequently and often.

Worldwide, the highest rates of new TB cases occur in India, Indonesia, China, the Philippines, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Nigeria, and South Africa. TB is considered to be the top cause of death worldwide by the World Health Organization (WHO).

The necessity of maintaining vital medical programs such as the USAID Tuberculosis Local Organization Network (TB-LON) are unlike a faucet that can simply be turned on or off. Patients who depend on and are unable to get their daily prescribed medications in order to fight the easily transmittable bacterial disease will, in turn, infect others around them resulting in further spread of the deadly contagion in the country of 241 million. Combined with terminated TB-LON programs in other countries, controlling the spread of TB, this will now contribute to its spread around the world.

The urgent medical necessity of continuing to diagnose, treat and cure TB infections by keeping it contained and managed was simply wiped away with by the simple use of a Sharpie. While the act of signing the order may make for a dramatic TV moment without aforethought of the repercussions of doing so, it will in the end result in the unnecessary and tragic consequences of further deaths.

Even if a pause of 90 days is a viable reality considering the thousands of such projects that have been terminated and would be subject to review, it will take many months before any will be restarted, preventing early diagnosis through chest x-rays and in restarting medication for those whose treatment had been disrupted in an all-out effort to contain and control the disease.

One ongoing challenge for physicians and staff in treating TB patients is monitoring the taking of their daily medications which is so critical to their recovery. Continuity of taking medication is a crucial factor in the control and cure of the disease. There is also the concern in the spreading of several thousand cases of drug-resistant TB that will go unmonitored and untreated.

According to the World Health Organization, in 2021 there were 611,000 TB cases in Pakistan and 50,000 deaths anually. Treatment through the use of daily prescribed medications of those patients under the pre-DOGE program realized a cure rate of around 94 percent.

Along with TB, the incident of HIV/AIDS is another area of concern in the country where it is estimated that in 2023 there were around 290,000 adults and children living with HIV according to the United Nation AIDS (UNAIDS) Project, accounting for 11,000 deaths annually. Medication for patients distributed by USAID to treat the disease have also been discontinued and like TB, will result in additional new cases and an increase in preventable deaths.

Defunded overall health programs in Pakistan will affect millions of people and, according to Global Voices, a Dutch human rights activist group, “In Pakistan, suspending US-funded health programs endanger 1.7 million people, including 1.2 million Afghan refugees who have been stuck in limbo in Pakistan since the US pulled out of Afghanistan in August 2021.”  Many patients will lose considerable momentum in their recovery and die as a result, but not before spreading diseases further.

These are just some of the health programs terminated by the Musk/Doge “Government Efficiency” program that has and will affect additional programs and services. And Pakistan is just one country out of many that receive critical lifesaving assistance through health-related programs whose cessation will impact global health and endanger the national security of the US and other nations.

Pakistan is also grievously afflicted by childhood malnourishment. In 2023, The Guardian newspaper reported that Pakistan has “recorded its highest-ever rates of malnutrition. According to the National Nutrition Survey, 33% of children are underweight, nearly 44% are stunted, 15% are wasted, and 50% suffer from anemia, with 33% specifically experiencing iron deficiency.” The salvation for babies and children who suffer from severe acute malnutrition is the USAID distributed Plumpy’Nut™ a peanut butter-based nutritional paste fortified with powdered milk and enriched with vitamins and minerals. The ready-to-use therapeutic food (RTUF) can revive a malnourished child in just three weeks at home without medical supervision or refrigeration and be administered easily in aiding a child’s recovery.

After initially canceling the USAID contract for the product in early March, the government changed direction the following day by reinstating its contract with Rhode Island manufacturer, Edsia (named for the goddess of food, associated with child development) but required that the company change all packaging to remove any USAID identification. The net effect in the disruption of the life-saving product is uncertainty, and moving forward no one can determine how long the contract may stay in force to maintain a steady supply of the life-saving product.

This fiasco echoes the sentiment of a sign held by a protester here in Washington that read “Why is the World’s richest man starving the World’s poorest children?”

Report and photo by Phil Pasquini

© 2025 nuzeink all rights reserved worldwide


Subscribe to Countercurrents

Countercurrents is answerable only to our readers. Support honest journalism because we have no PLANET B.

Join our newsletter

Get the CounterCurrents daily newsletter straight to your inbox.

Follow Countercurrents

Get our updates on WhatsApp, Telegram and Google News, or add us as a preferred source on Google Search.



CC Newsletter 19 Oct - Beyond the Headlines: The Struggle for Justice, Dignity and a Democratic World

                                                                                                                                                     

LOTS OF POSTS IGNORED BY BLOGGER.....

OR REMOVED ON THEIR WHIM!

ALL POSTS ARE AVAILABLE ON

MIDDLEBORO REVIEW AND SO ON

BLOGGER DOESN'T LIKE TRUTH OR FACTS!

BLOGGER DOESN'T LIKE FUND RAISERS AND DELETES

POSTS THAT INCLUDE FUNDRAISING THAT 'VIOLATES THEIR

UNDEFINED COMMUNITY STANDARDS SO ALL 'FUND RAISING'

IS DELETED - CONTRIBUTE AS YOU ARE INCLINED TO SUPPORT

IMPORTANT ISSUES! THESE ARE NOT SOLICITATIONS 


COUNTERCURRENTS NEWSLETTER POSTED IN ITS ENTIRETY DUE TO 

SIGNIFICANT GLOBAL ISSUES....


Dear Friend,

The common thread running through today’s issue of Countercurrents is the struggle to defend human dignity against systems of power that normalise injustice, silence dissent and place political interests above human lives.

From Gaza to Yemen, from the streets of France to the democratic movements of young people in India, our contributors examine how power operates, how resistance emerges and how societies are shaped by the choices of governments, institutions and citizens. The destruction of Palestinian lives and historical memory, the selective morality of Western political establishments, and the use of empathy to justify or challenge exclusion reveal the deep contradictions between professed values and political practice.

Other articles explore the connections between war and fossil fuels, the historical lessons of Bangladesh, the criminalisation of activists defending land and community rights, and the urgent need to make education and knowledge accessible to all. Reflections on Goethe, humanitarian disarmament and long-term land stewardship remind us that peace and justice require more than opposition to immediate wrongs. They demand a transformation in how we understand our responsibilities to one another and to the generations that will follow us.

The struggles documented in this issue may appear geographically and thematically diverse, but they share a fundamental question: Who bears the cost of power, and whose lives, voices and histories are considered expendable? Whether the subject is war, ecological destruction, communal division, economic inequality or democratic exclusion, the challenge is to resist the normalisation of suffering and create space for more humane alternatives.

We also continue our Silver Jubilee reflections with T T Sreekumar’s examination of journalism as a democratic commons. His contribution speaks directly to the purpose of Countercurrents: to bring scholarship into conversation with lived struggles, amplify voices marginalised by dominant media, and sustain a space for independent thought and collective imagination.

Countercurrents exists because readers believe that journalism must do more than reproduce the narratives of the powerful. It must question authority, preserve memory, defend the vulnerable and help people understand the structures that shape their lives.

This work depends entirely on reader support. We invite you to stand with us, share our articles and help sustain this independent space for critical journalism.

FUNDRAISING APPEAL

The work we publish each day—connecting wars, ecological crises, democratic struggles and social movements to their deeper causes, amplifying critical voices, and sustaining spaces for independent thought—depends entirely on reader support. If you find value in this kind of journalism, we invite you to help sustain it. Your contribution enables us to continue documenting, analysing, and resisting the forces that shape our world.

Support us:https://countercurrents.org/subscription/.



If you find value in the work we publish, please forward this newsletter to friends and colleagues and help strengthen independent, reader-supported journalism. Your support and sharing help us continue providing a space for critical voices and thoughtful analysis. You can subscribe to our newsletter here http://www.countercurrents.org/news-letter/.

In Solidarity

Binu Mathew
Editor
Countercurrents.org



PALESTINE


Trump, Epstein, and the Netanyahu Endorsement: The Strange Standards of Western Shame
by Junaid S Ahmad


In “Trump, Epstein, and the Netanyahu Endorsement: The Strange Standards of Western Shame,” Junaid S Ahmad examines the contrasting reactions to Donald Trump’s association with Jeffrey Epstein and his endorsement of Benjamin Netanyahu. The article argues that Western political establishments condemn scandals that threaten their moral reputation while accommodating mass violence committed by strategic allies. It situates this double standard within the racialised narratives of Western civilisation and the history of colonial conquest and imperial power. Trump’s open celebration of Netanyahu, Ahmad argues, exposes the contradictions between humanitarian rhetoric and the political support extended to Israel’s devastating campaign in Gaza.


For History’s Sake: Guarding The Palestinian Narrative  From Israeli Distortion
by Dr Naela Al Waari


The destruction of Palestinian history extends beyond the loss of homes and lives to the archives, libraries, documents and cultural institutions that preserve collective memory. Dr Naela Al Waari examines how Palestinian records were seized, scattered or made inaccessible following the Nakba of 1948 and the occupation of East Jerusalem in 1967. The destruction of universities, libraries, museums and heritage sites in Gaza since October 2023 has further threatened the sources needed to reconstruct Palestinian history. Al Waari argues that historians must preserve surviving records, investigate missing documents and ensure that historical narratives are not left solely to the victors.


Stealing Palestine, Stealing Enlightenment
by David Swanson


David Swanson reviews "Wired to Steal" by Yoav Litvin and Ilan Pappé, examining the historical roots of Zionism, its relationship with European anti-Semitism, white supremacy, nationalism and settler colonialism. He reflects on how Zionist propaganda has shaped public perceptions of Israel and framed violence as self-defence, while Western governments continue to support Israeli policies. Swanson explores the contradictions between commitments to equality, civil liberties and international law and the defence of a state that discriminates against non-Jews. He recommends the book while questioning its treatment of political motivations and its reliance on contested psychological research.


‘Deck of Shame’: Using Art to Remember Gaza and Demand Accountability
by Romi Mahajan


In this interview, Paras Shah discusses "Deck of Shame: Gaza Genocide Edition", a deck of playing cards naming 52 individuals he considers most directly responsible for the genocide in Gaza. Inspired by the “Most Wanted” cards distributed to U.S. troops during the 2003 invasion of Iraq, the project uses art to confront power, preserve memory and demand accountability. Shah reflects on how euphemistic language obscures the scale of violence and how art can resist the dehumanisation of Palestinians. He also describes a grant programme supporting student groups, community organisations and advocacy initiatives working for justice for Palestinians.


TRUMP - SAUDI ARABIA

Saudis Reject Trump Offer For Israeli Help in War
by Abdel Bari Atwan


Abdel Bari Atwan examines Donald Trump’s reported attempt to persuade Saudi Arabia to accept Israeli military assistance against Yemen’s Houthi movement and join the Abraham Accords. He argues that the proposal is intended to draw Riyadh back into a conflict that diplomacy had helped contain, while using military pressure to advance normalization with Israel. Atwan maintains that Israeli intervention would undermine Saudi Arabia’s standing among its own population and the wider Islamic world. He calls for renewed negotiations between Saudi Arabia and Yemen, arguing that dialogue, rather than foreign military intervention, offers the only viable path to peace.



FRANCE PROTESTS

France is Burning: Fire on the Streets, State Crisis, and the Future of French Democracy
by Asish Gupta


France’s recent street protests reflect a deepening crisis of social trust, economic security and democratic accountability. Demonstrations that began over deteriorating school conditions have expanded to encompass the rising cost of living, inadequate public services, education inequalities and uncertainty about the future. The clashes between protesters and police have intensified debates over state authority, the right to peaceful protest and police accountability. Drawing on France’s recent history of mass movements, Asish Gupta examines how austerity, political instability and unequal access to opportunities have fuelled public anger. The article argues that restoring democratic trust requires tangible improvements in education and public services, not repression alone.


CLIMATE CHANGE


Are the peace movement and the climate movement the same thing?
by Bill McKibben


Bill McKibben argues that the peace movement and the climate movement must work together to confront the central role of fossil fuels in modern warfare. From conflicts over oil reserves to fuel blockades and attacks on energy infrastructure, oil has become a cause, weapon and vulnerability in international conflicts. McKibben sees the transition to renewable energy as a way to reduce both greenhouse gas emissions and the economic incentives driving wars. Solar and wind power, electric vehicles and heat pumps can weaken dependence on fossil fuels while strengthening energy security. He presents the solar panel as a new symbol of peace.



COUNTER SOLUTIONS


Designing land access with deep time in mind: Moving toward a timeless ethic of land stewardship
by Darby Weaver


In “Designing Land Access with Deep Time in Mind,” Darby Weaver argues for a shift from treating land as private property and a financial asset to understanding it as a living inheritance. Drawing on Indigenous traditions, ecological stewardship, and the experiences of farmers, Weaver examines how speculative real estate markets threaten farmland, food production, and generations of accumulated knowledge. The article explores community-centred land trusts as a way to protect regenerative farms and preserve their work beyond individual lifetimes. It calls for a long-term ethic of care in which people become stewards of the land for generations yet to come.



DISARMAMENT


Goethe and the Moral Roots of Peace and Humanitarian Disarmament
by Ghassan Shahrour


In "Goethe and the Moral Roots of Peace and Humanitarian Disarmament", Ghassan Shahrour explores how Johann Wolfgang von Goethe’s ideas on human development, education, cultural exchange and moral responsibility can inform contemporary efforts to prevent violence. While Goethe did not formulate a modern disarmament programme, his reflections offer insights into the cultural foundations of peace. Shahrour connects Goethe’s concept of world literature with international solidarity and examines how education can strengthen empathy, critical thought and respect for human dignity. The article argues that lasting humanitarian disarmament requires more than laws and treaties; it demands a culture that refuses to accept human suffering as inevitable.



BANGLADESH


Learnings from Bangladesh History on how the life of over one million people and top leaders could have been saved
by Bharat Dogra


Bharat Dogra examines the lessons of Bangladesh’s history, focusing on how principled diplomacy could have prevented mass suffering and saved over a million lives during the 1971 genocide. He highlights the warnings issued by US diplomats Archer Blood and Kenneth Keating, whose appeals for a change in Washington’s policy were ignored by President Richard Nixon and Henry Kissinger. The article also examines the assassination of Sheikh Mujibur Rahman in 1975, the subsequent erosion of democracy and secularism, and the international dimensions of political upheaval. It calls for historical accountability, ethical diplomacy, and greater vigilance against foreign interference.



INDIAN DEMOCRACY


Gen Z protests in India are so peaceful and democratic; look at the violence in France
by Vidyadhar Date


In his article, Vidyadhar Date contrasts the peaceful and democratic character of recent Gen Z protests in India with the violent unrest in France and other European countries. Despite the injustices faced by Indians, young protesters have demonstrated restraint, while authorities have responded with barricades, disruption and hostility. Date criticises university professors and public intellectuals for blaming protesters while remaining silent about police brutality and the erosion of democratic norms. Drawing on Julian Benda’s The Treason of the Intellectuals, Thomas Docherty’s critique of universities and Shakespeare’s Macbeth, he questions the complicity of intellectuals with power and defends youthful dissent.


Fear Blinked First
by Nihar Nalini Sarangi


In "Fear Blinked First", Nihar Nalini Sarangi examines the psychological shift behind the rise of the Cockroach Janata Party (CJP). Beginning with a judge’s remark comparing unemployed young people to cockroaches, the article traces how satire transformed private humiliation into collective expression. The movement challenged learned helplessness, broke the isolation that sustains silence, and drew political parties into a growing debate over unemployment, democratic institutions and public dissent. Yet its future remains uncertain. With no settled programme or formal organisation, the CJP faces questions of leadership, democratic accountability and political direction. Its immediate legacy is a generation no longer silent.


The Maturity of Abhijeet Dipake and the CJP: Beyond the Pro-BJP Label
by Nagesh Chaudhari


Abhijeet Dipake and the Cockroach Janata Party (CJP) have been accused of functioning as a B-team of the BJP. This article challenges that characterisation by examining Dipake’s positions on caste, reservations, Ambedkar and communal politics. It highlights his criticism of the Hindu-Muslim narrative, his support for reservations and his call for the annihilation of caste. It also examines the historical record of the Congress and Communist parties on reservations and social justice. The article argues that confronting the RSS and BJP requires multiple protest movements and a broader democratic mobilisation rather than dismissing emerging groups through political labels.



EDUCATION


Proposing a Public Interest Endowment University Model for Keralam
by Deva Prasad M and Silpa Satheesh


India’s endowment universities offer greater academic flexibility, research funding and faculty mobility, but high fees often place them beyond the reach of ordinary families. In this article, Deva Prasad M and Silpa Satheesh propose a public interest endowment university model for Keralam that combines academic excellence with equitable access. They examine the limitations of the state’s existing higher education system, including bureaucratic delays, politicised appointments and inadequate research infrastructure. The proposed model would draw on philanthropic, CSR, alumni and institutional endowments, supported by public accountability, stakeholder participation and scholarships to ensure that quality education remains accessible to socially marginalised students.



One Nation, One Subscription, But Not for Everyone
by Dr Anu M Varghese


India’s One Nation One Subscription (ONOS) scheme allocates nearly ?6,000 crore over three years to provide access to scholarly journals across more than 6,300 institutions. Dr Anu M Varghese examines the promise and limitations of this initiative. While the scheme could expand research access for students and faculty in government institutions, private colleges, independent researchers, journalists and others remain outside its coverage. The article also highlights the uncertainty of subscription-based access beyond 2027 and the financial barriers researchers face in publishing open-access work. It argues for a more inclusive and lasting approach to making knowledge accessible.



HUMAN RIGHTS


Two Anti-Mining Activists Arrested in Kantamal Case, Raising Due Process Concerns
by Prakash Kumar Samantsinghar


The arrests of anti-mining activists Dr. Randall Sequeira and Laxman Naik in Odisha have raised serious concerns over due process and the treatment of those defending community rights. Arrested in connection with the April 6–7 incidents in Kantamal village, both men were reportedly detained overnight without access to lawyers or family members. Neither was named in the FIR relating to the case, according to the report. Questions have also emerged over the seizure of their mobile phones and allegations of police misconduct. The arrests have renewed scrutiny of criminal cases against activists opposing mining projects and defending Adivasi and Dalit communities’ land, forests and livelihoods.



COMMUNAL HARMONY


FORUM National Convention Calls for Justice, Peace and Solidarity Amid Threats to India’s Democracy
Press Release


The XIX National Convention of the Forum of Religious for Justice and Peace (FORUM), held in Pune from 10 to 12 October 2026, called for renewed action against systemic injustice, communal violence, corruption, discrimination and threats to India’s secular and democratic fabric. Bringing together members from 14 states and 27 congregations, the convention emphasised solidarity with the poor, protection of constitutional rights, ecological justice and engagement with young people. Its unanimously adopted statement pledged to listen to marginalised communities, accompany vulnerable groups, build partnerships across civil society and translate convictions into concrete programmes for justice, peace, reconciliation and democratic participation.



PHILOSOPHY


The Use and Misuse of Empathy, From Gaza to Ireland
by Hugh Curran


In "The Use and Misuse of Empathy, From Gaza to Ireland", Hugh J. Curran examines how empathy, a foundation of moral life, can be restricted by political loyalties and used to justify injustice. Drawing on Adam Smith and David Hume, he explores the relationship between shared suffering and moral judgment. The article criticises Western governments’ military support for Israel amid the destruction of Gaza, arguing that this complicity undermines the credibility of Western liberal values. Connecting the histories of Ireland and Palestine, Curran calls for an empathy that crosses national boundaries and extends to all living beings.



RELIGION


The Politics of “Suicidal Empathy”: A Critical Examination of Anti-Muslim Narratives, Civilisational Decline, and the Misuse of Science
by V A Mohamad Ashrof


In his critical examination of a review of Gad Saad’s "Suicidal Empathy: Dying to Be Kind", V A Mohamad Ashrof challenges the use of evolutionary psychology to legitimise anti-Muslim narratives and claims of civilisational decline. The article examines how anecdotes, dehumanising metaphors and sweeping generalisations are used to portray Muslim migrants as threats, question humanitarian obligations towards Gaza, and frame compassion as societal weakness. It also scrutinises claims about refugee hosting and the scientific authority invoked to support political arguments. Ashrof distinguishes legitimate debates about empathy and public policy from narratives that turn religious and ethnic minorities into civilisational enemies.



NOVEL


Chapter 5 – Rumors That Abu Yusuf al-Tahhan Has Returned
by Dr Salim Nazzal


In the fifth chapter of "The Latest News of Abu Yusuf al-Tahhan", Dr Salim Nazzal weaves village folklore, historical memory and human longing into an evocative narrative. Rumours, whispered conversations and mysterious signs shape the villagers’ understanding of events, revealing how uncertainty can nourish both fear and hope. The story moves between intimate personal relationships and the wider currents of history, with the Battle of Ayn Jalut providing a significant historical backdrop. Nazzal’s restrained prose captures the rhythms of village life and its collective imagination, creating an atmosphere of anticipation that sustains the reader’s curiosity without sacrificing the novel’s reflective depth.



COUNTERCURRENTS SILVER JUBILEE SYMPOSIUM


Countercurrents at Twenty-Five: Journalism as a Democratic Commons
by T T Sreekumar


As part of Countercurrents Silver Jubilee Symposium, T T Sreekumar writes on journalism as a democratic commons. Reflecting on the publication’s twenty-five-year journey, he examines its role in sustaining an independent space for dissent, critical inquiry and solidarity. He argues that journalism must make visible the experiences of communities excluded from dominant accounts of social reality. Countercurrents brings scholarship into dialogue with lived struggles, enabling activists, movement participants and writers to contribute to public knowledge. Sustained by reader support and collective participation, this democratic commons challenges concentrated media power and keeps alternative visions of social transformation alive.





“This Is Not What the Founders Envisioned”

                                                                                                                                                    

LOTS OF POSTS IGNORED BY BLOGGER.....

OR REMOVED ON THEIR WHIM!

ALL POSTS ARE AVAILABLE ON

MIDDLEBORO REVIEW AND SO ON

BLOGGER DOESN'T LIKE TRUTH OR FACTS!

BLOGGER DOESN'T LIKE FUND RAISERS AND DELETES

POSTS THAT INCLUDE FUNDRAISING THAT 'VIOLATES THEIR

UNDEFINED COMMUNITY STANDARDS SO ALL 'FUND RAISING'

IS DELETED - CONTRIBUTE AS YOU ARE INCLINED TO SUPPORT

IMPORTANT ISSUES! THESE ARE NOT SOLICITATIONS 


As his lawyers prepared to return to court this morning in the legal battle over the East Potomac links, Donald Trump was up early, posting on Truth Social about U.S. District Judge Ana Reyes. He called her a “crazed lunatic” and suggested she “may be insane.” In other words, more of the behavior we’ve come to expect from this president on days that end in “Y.” That’s not to minimize what he does, because it’s dangerous, and it’s serious. But he’s also predictable—predictably unpresidential, whether he’s currying favor with Putin or pretend-campaigning for Republicans who wish he wasn’t on the stage with him just weeks away from the midterm elections.

This is how the president—who told the Judge in the BBC case, a case he himself brought, and that we discussed in The Week Ahead, that he’s too busy to be deposed in that case—is spending his time. Not happy to let his lawyers represent him in court, the president took to social media to attack a federal judge.

It’s easy to lose sight of how commonplace that has become. And how devastating it is. It used to be that threats against federal judges came from unhappy litigants, as with three of the four federal judges who have been murdered in the last 50 years. The fourth, Judge John Roll, was killed in the shooting involving Congresswoman Gabby Giffords. In 2020, Judge Esther Salas faced an attack in her own home that led to the murder of her son, by a lawyer in a case in front of her who was a self-described “anti-feminist” and “men's rights” lawyer. But those events didn’t come from inside of the house.

PBS reported that “Hundreds of federal judges have received threats against themselves and their families this year [2026], according to the U.S. Marshals Service. It comes amid a litany of verbal and written attacks by President Trump and his administration on judges who have ruled against them.” There is no reason for the president of the United States to put federal judges, public servants, in harm’s way. And yet, that was where his attention was focused as the lawyers returned to court in the East Potomac Park case today.

Overnight, Judge Reyes denied the government’s motion to disqualify her from the case. In their motion, they portrayed her as overly emotional and argued she demonstrated bias against the government. What they left out was that the Judge only became angry with the government after it misled her and betrayed her trust. If you’ve been reading along here, you know that’s the case, as we parsed through the Judge’s early willingness to trust the government to follow court orders and not do what it ended up doing, cutting down hundreds of trees despite the existence of an injunction that prohibited them from doing that. “It is easy to weaponize selective quotations to bring a baseless recusal motion,” she wrote in the order refusing to recuse herself. “But it is much harder to meet the demanding legal standard against a full record.”

That meant the government’s lawyers were back in front of her this morning.

The Judge did not rule from the bench on whether she would grant a preliminary injunction. Likely that will come in the next few days. And she did not punish the government’s lawyers in court. But during the hearing, while talking about the government’s shifting positions, Judge Reyes said she was not playing whack-a-mole game and that somebody “is going to take responsibility for what happens in this courtroom.” We’ll wait to see what her decision is and what she says in the opinion when it comes down.

Last Tuesday, as it became apparent the government was trying to lay //word check?// the Judge, I wrote to you: “Trump supporters characterized Judge Reyes as angry, unprofessional, and worse in the hearing on Monday. It’s easy to play the woman judge as overly emotional. But here’s a different interpretation: she was righteously angry. She understands the stakes. And she knows she can’t blink, as others have before her. Because if she does, this administration keeps taking it further, until there’s nothing left of the rule of law.” Today’s hearing offers hope that this is the correct interpretation of where the Judge stands.

But today’s hearing seemed to end where the day started, with the president posting on social media. At the end of the hearing, Judge Reyes said that her family was seeing media reports that she was receiving death threats and they were “freaking out.” “Over a golf course,” she emphasized. This is how she ended the hearing: “I really don’t think that’s what the founders envisioned.”

Nothing that Donald Trump is doing is what the Founders envisioned. Tonight, with serious issues facing us, he posted this on Truth Social: “The Dumocrat Agenda is a plan to extinguish Western Civilization.”

We need federal judges who are willing to speak truth to power. Now more than ever.

One of the worst things that could happen right now is to become accustomed to things that should shock us. Like a president attacking a judge or a judge’s family fearing for her safety. Or government lawyers who act like the rules don’t apply to them. None of this is normal, and we can’t afford to start treating it like it is. So I’m grateful to belong to this community of people who pay attention and ask hard questions. If you’re a regular Civil Discourse reader but you haven’t become a paid subscriber yet, I hope you’ll decide to join in today. Your subscription supports the newsletter. It also helps keep the facts from getting lost in a flooded zone and keeps abuses of power under scrutiny. Most importantly, it means that none of us has to figure out what comes next alone.

We’re in this together,

Joyce




Weekend Edition | Despite Midterm Win, Will Dems Help GOP Pass 'Massive Giveaway' to Big Oil and Big Tech?

                                                              LOTS OF POSTS IGNORED BY BLOGGER..... OR REMOVED ON THEIR WHIM! ALL POSTS ARE ...