Friday, August 15, 2025

The redistricting war of 2025

 

What we do know for sure is that the redistricting chaos won’t stop with Texas. Democracy Docket reporter Jim Saksa put together a helpful guide to everything we’ve heard about blue states that could redistrict in response to Texas and red states facing pressure from the White House to redraw their maps, as well. 

 

Republicans have defended their redistricting plan by arguing blue states are just as gerrymandered as Texas. (Jim’s story provides the numbers so you can decide for yourself, by the way.) Harmeet Dhillon, head of the DOJ’s Civil Rights Division, is using the same talking points. She warned in a weekend interview that “there will be consequences” for California and New York should they redistrict because they are already “gerrymandered to the hilt.” 

 

As Jim wrote: “Democrats may be abandoning the moral high ground in the gerrymandering wars, but Republicans have long enjoyed control of the strategic high ground.”

 

For now, we’re keeping an eye on Florida, Missouri and Ohio, as well as California, New York, Illinois and Maryland. Read more about the redistricting war here.

Democracy Docket reporter Yunior Rivas took a closer look this week at how Latino voters could be particularly impacted by Texas redistricting.  

 

The GOP’s proposed congressional map targets districts represented by Latino Democrats – so even as Republicans are courting Latino voters symbolically, they’re cutting off their actual electoral power.

 

And Republicans are making no secret about their strategy.

 

“We have three Hispanic-predominated districts in South Texas that we believe we can carve out for Republican leadership,” State Rep. Mitch Little (R) admitted on CNN. “It’s good for our party. It’s good for our state. And we need to ensure that Donald Trump’s agenda continues to be enacted.”

 

The bottom line is, if Republicans enact their new map in Texas, the number of districts where Latino voters can effectively elect their preferred candidates is projected to shrink. Read more here.

Rep. Trey Martinez Fischer left Texas to deny Republicans a quorum and block their gerrymandered map. He sat down with Marc to discuss the threats to him and his colleagues, Abbott and Attorney General Ken Paxton's internal battle, and what’s next in the redistricting fight. Watch it on YouTube here.

I am DIGGING IN my DAMN HEELS!!!


Ramble On: Colossal Wreck (video)


Trump's Essential Weakness

 


Dispatches of alarm and hope, on politics and society, democracy and justice. Because silence is not an option. We may read and write alone, but we drive change together.


Trump's Essential Weakness

We must hold onto our ability to recognize that Trump's despotism is built on a throne of lies—and it will not endure

The American Eagle knows the truth. (A video screenshot)

He called his social media platform Truth Social. He said Haitian immigrants were eating cats and dogs. He said his mass deportation operation would target only dangerous criminals. He rejected the weak job data and fired the labor statistics chief responsible for reporting it. He signed an executive order called “Restoring Truth and Sanity in American History” with a plan to take over the Smithsonian Institution and rewrite history. He deployed the military in Washington, D.C., claiming it was an emergency driven by bloodshed and bedlam, while the city’s actual crime rates are declining. He plans a meeting on American soil with Russian dictator Vladimir Putin, claiming he wants to bring peace, yet doesn’t invite Ukraine’s President Volodymyr Zelensky. He says his tariffs are raising not billions but trillions of dollars. He boasts that he doesn’t take a presidential salary, yet exploits his public office to rake in billions to stuff his own pockets. He asks why shouldn’t he accept Qatar’s “gift” of a 747 jet, but doesn’t mention that it will cost upwards of a billion dollars to make it usable as Air Force One. He said he wanted to cut government costs, yet pushed the passage of a bill that adds over three trillion dollars to the national debt and hands his rich buddies over two trillion in tax cuts. He whines that the voting system is rigged, then pushes Texas to rig its system. He demands a “new and highly accurate CENSUS based on modern day facts and figures” because he doesn’t like the numbers, even though the last one happened in 2020 and the Constitution decrees census-taking every ten years. He says he won in 2024 by a landslide and earned a mandate, even though he only won by one-and-a-half percentage points. He still says he won in 2020, even though he lost by three-and-a-half percentage points. He still says Russian interference in the 2016 election was a hoax and climate change is a hoax. He wants to destroy NASA satellites that track climate change data. Any time a reporter asks a question that he doesn’t like, he calls them fake news. He calls his regime “a perfect administration.” He says America is the world’s “hottest country,” even though layoffs are rising, costs are soaring and global opinion toward America is cratering. He called the Jeffrey Epstein story a hoax and “total bullshit,” while the FBI deployed a thousand agents to dig through all the files to identify references to Trump. He calls himself the President of the United States, even though he says he vehemently hates Democrats, who comprise nearly half of the country. He calls himself the President of the United States, yet he despises the Constitution and is turning the country into a gangster state led by a mafia boss.


I’ve surely skipped plenty of other examples. But this is not about providing a comprehensive list of all the ways in which Donald J. Trump ignores or openly rejects the truth and pushes lies to elevate himself and his ill-informed opinions. This is about looking squarely at his effort to advance a dictatorship in which facts, data and knowable reality are replaced by his desperate need to look strong and be a winner.

Our beloved country is being held hostage by this malignant narcissist who stokes fear, hate and division and who relies on his sycophantic operatives to repeat his lies and degrade the public’s capacity to know what is true or false. Note the comments in recent days made by his bloodless Deputy Chief of Staff, Stephen Miller, after Trump pushed lies about crime in D.C. and reporters questioned them. “Crime stats in big blue cities are fake,” Miller declared. “The real rates of crime, chaos and dysfunction are orders of magnitude higher.”

It’s no wonder that the guy Trump wants to insert as commissioner of the Bureau of Labor Statistics, E.J. Antoni, is a hack economist who kowtows to Trump, despises the bureau, rejects its work and has already said he would drop the monthly jobs report and go quarterly. Of course, Trump is all for a guy who is not committed to informing the citizenry but instead to doing his bidding: “Our Economy is booming, and E.J. will ensure that the Numbers released are HONEST and ACCURATE,” Trump said in announcing this selection. This follows his previous comments rejecting the jobs data earlier this month: “In my opinion, today's Jobs Numbers were RIGGED in order to make the Republicans, and ME, look bad.”

I share these points not to discourage you. Quite the contrary. The more untethered Trump is from reality and the more obvious are his lies, the more his weakness is revealed, his decline will be hastened and his end assured. Do you doubt that the allies of America—and I don’t mean Trump’s America—can see through the obvious bullshit? Do you doubt that most of our fellow Americans can grasp that he’s trying to rule on his throne of lies? It’s up to us to hold onto our capacity to know what’s true and to maintain our capacity for independent thought.

Yes, we are undermined by cowards who have chosen to capitulate to this bloviating con artist—and it’s demoralizing that many of them represent once-respected schools, law firms, businesses and legacy media organizations. But every day the lies mount, I take strength from the knowledge that they can’t sustain this house of cards. The regime may succeed in adding to their list of surrender monkeys. But as our economy continues to decline, our body politic becomes more fractured and their hostility toward our democratic system and basic humanity becomes more vivid and unavoidable, I expect public outrage and public protest to grow. That means all of us recognizing our collective power and remembering that we are participants—not just spectators—in this 249-year-old democratic experiment and its survival.


One last note: California Gov. Gavin Newsom made a powerful case today for putting redistricting on California’s ballot in November to fight back against Trump’s push through Texas to grab five additional Republican House seats. His forceful speech represented his vivid commitment to fight “fire with fire,” recognizing that California is the nation’s fourth largest economy and can provide outsized influence.

“California will not sit idle as Trump and his Republican lapdogs shred our country’s democracy before our very eyes,” Newsom said. “In just six months, Trump’s unchecked power has cost Americans billions and taken an ax to the greatest democracy we’ve ever known. This moment calls for urgency and action: That is what we are putting before voters this November, a chance to fight back against his anti-American ways.”

And more: Trump “doesn’t play by a different set of rules—he doesn’t believe in the rules. And as a consequence, we need to disabuse ourselves of the way things have been done. It’s not good enough to just hold hands, have a candlelight vigil and talk about the way the world should be. We have got to recognize the cards that have been dealt, and we have got to meet fire with fire.”

This is the kind of urgency that I have missed from too many of our Democratic leaders who have seemed stuck in the old ways of doing things. Newsom’s push is a promising sign that—out in America, at the state level, among the laboratories of democracy—we just might find the necessary firepower to overcome Trump and his hostile takeover.

Please consider becoming a paid subscriber for $50 a year or just $5 a month, if you’re not already. This helps sustain and expand the work of America, America, keeps nearly all the content free for everyone and gives you full access to the comment sections. Building our community has never been more important.

Democrats finally bring a gun to the gun fight

 


Democrats finally bring a gun to the gun fight


It’s a serious moment; we all get that. But sometimes we just need to breathe a little life into it. That’s why California Governor Gavin Newsom’s Press Office account imitating Donald Trump on X felt pretty life-giving.

Here at Civil Discourse, we’ve built a community that understands the stakes for our democracy. Subscribers make that possible—come be part of it.”


Newsom has asked state legislators to put proposed new congressional maps on the ballot in a special election this November, as a counter to Republican redistricting efforts in Texas, which were presented as an attempt to obtain more safe seats in the House ahead of Democrats’ expected gains in the midterm elections. Republicans didn’t even try to disguise it, with President Trump leading the charge and saying he believed they could get five more seats out of Texas. Newsom’s press office account tweeted, “Donald Trump does not play fair! So California will fight back — to make it fair for voters all across this country.”

So many times in the Trump era, Democrats—trying to take the high ground—end up bringing a knife to a gun fight. Sometimes they are accused of showing up with nothing more than a glass of lemonade. It’s challenging to be the adults in the room, the ones who try to live by the Constitution and follow the law, when the other side has abandoned any pretense of fair play.

Take, for example, the fight for voting rights. Ahead of the 2016 election, Governor Pat McCrory of North Carolina, who was up for reelection, tried to change his state’s rules for his own benefit. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals rejected his blatant efforts at voter suppression, writing, “The asserted justifications cannot and do not conceal the State’s true motivation. ‘In essence, … the State took away [minority voters’] opportunity because [they] were about to exercise it. … This bears the mark of intentional discrimination.’” The court overruled the new laws McCrory had signed in an effort to restrict access to the right to vote, holding that they targeted African-Americans with “almost surgical precision” and “discriminatory intent.”

Despite the Justice Department’s successful challenge—decided months ahead of the election—McCrory and the Republican party still made it more difficult for many Democrats to vote. And when McCrory lost by more than ten thousand votes, instead of conceding, he made false claims of voter fraud to try to hold on to the office. Rather than giving his successor, Roy Cooper, a smooth transition, McCrory signed two bills designed to strip Cooper of powers the governor has traditionally held over state election boards. By all accounts, McCrory played dirty politics.

Texas Democrat Greg Casar recently accused his party of bringing a butter knife to a gunfight when Trump called for redistricting, which Texas’s Republican Governor Greg Abbott seemed eager to deliver. Then Casar got a pleasant surprise. Texas Democrats decided to fight back in an unorthodox manner by leaving the state to deprive Texas House Republicans of the quorum they would need to vote on the measure to redraw the state’s congressional maps.

Not everyone was sure it was the right thing to do at first. Democrats, as a party, believe in following the rules. But there was a higher rule at work here: the principle that every American citizen should be able to exercise their right to vote. Texas legislators realized the only way to do the job their constituents had elected them to do was to use fresh tactics to combat yet another effort by Republicans to deprive them of their rights.

The first time I had a serious conversation about the need for Democrats to respond in kind was with Marc Elias. It was something of a gut punch, because while I hated the idea of Democrats responding to Texas by offering their own plans to redistrict and gerrymander in California, I understood it was a practical necessity. If Republicans are able to rearrange the maps so they have perpetual control of Congress, democracy would be lost.

We are now at a crossroads where Democrats understand we cannot sit back and let democracy be unraveled. And that is a good thing. It is the fight so many of us have been hoping for. It’s not a happy moment, but it’s a necessary one. And as long as we do it with an understanding of why we are doing it—that it is, and must always be, about protecting voting rights—I believe we will come out okay.

Today, former President Barack Obama and former Attorney General Eric Holder held a call with Texas Democrats, who are still in absentia. In a statement, an Obama spokesperson said the former president “lauded their fight against the Republican efforts to enact an even more egregious gerrymander in Texas ahead of the midterms.” The spokesperson continued that Obama “made clear that they are part of a bigger effort to protect free and fair elections and commended them for inspiring others with their actions.”

We cannot let MAGA take away our ability to determine the outcome of American elections. Voters must be free to choose their elected officials; it is not the job of politicians to select their voters. Democrats are finally fighting to win, not just to enter the fray. The Supreme Court has said it will not interfere with political gerrymanders, no matter how offensive it is to democracy—a decision of questionable wisdom. But when Republicans engage in blatant efforts to suppress the vote, as they are in Texas and they are preparing to do elsewhere ahead of 2026, Democrats must stand up for democracy. They’re doing that now.

You’ve just read today’s column without a paywall because of the support of paid subscribers. If you want to help keep this work available for everyone—and get extra benefits like Friday night’s Five Questions columns along the way—please subscribe.

We’re in this together,

Joyce


Preorder my book


Top News | 'He’s Not Going to Run Unopposed': Sanders Rejects Schumer for Majority Leader

                                                               LOTS OF POSTS IGNORED BY BLOGGER..... OR REMOVED ON THEIR WHIM! ALL POSTS ARE...