Obliterated or Overstated? Trump claims Iran’s nuclear program was "obliterated"—yet no proof, no oversight, and no allies confirm it. If he's wrong, the consequences could be catastrophic. Michael Cohen and MeidasTouch Network Jun 24 Guest article by Michael Cohen BERK CAN / Shutterstock.com On the world stage, words have consequences. So when the President of the United States announces that Iran’s nuclear program has been “obliterated,” the international community should pause, pay attention, and most importantly, ask for proof. What we’ve seen instead is silence. No confirmation from our allies. No independent verification from the International Atomic Energy Agency. Not a single statement from Israeli defense officials—who, let’s be honest, have never missed an opportunity to celebrate a blow to Tehran’s nuclear capabilities. What we’re left with is a bold, consequential claim made by Donald Trump and his inner circle, offered without evidence, without congressional briefing, and without collaboration with the very nations that have the most at stake. Now this isn’t about party politics. This isn’t a partisan question. This is about transparency, accountability, and national security. I know what it looks like when Trump operates behind a smokescreen. I know how often facts are bent, massaged, or completely invented to serve a political objective or satisfy an impulse for attention. But this? This is not a real estate deal or a ratings play. This is nuclear diplomacy. And if the obliteration claim is accurate, the consequences are enormous. If it’s not, the repercussions are even greater. Let’s assume for a moment that the claim is true. That Iran’s nuclear program has been effectively dismantled; rendered inoperable, incapable of being revived. If that’s the case, then this would be one of the most significant strategic wins for the United States in a generation. And yet, where is the oversight? Why hasn’t Congress been briefed? Why hasn’t the intelligence community offered corroboration? And why has no ally—certainly not Israel—validated the results? If this was a legitimate, successful operation, the American people should know what it means. We should be talking about next steps, about shifts in regional power dynamics, about the future of sanctions and diplomacy. We should be working with our allies to prevent resurgence, to ensure the work done—if it was done—is permanent. That’s not a Democrat or Republican position. That’s what governance looks like in a functioning democracy. And yet, there’s been no indication of movement in that direction. That’s not just suspicious; it’s dangerous. Now let’s look at the other possibility: that the information is inflated, misleading, or outright false. That would mean that the U.S. government—our commander-in-chief—has just declared a strategic victory where none exists. And in doing so, may have provoked one of the most dangerous regimes on the planet without preparation, verification, or a plan for the fallout. Iran has long been deliberate in its nuclear ambitions. It has learned from North Korea, from Iraq, from Libya. It conceals, it delays, it builds redundancy into every part of its program. That’s not speculation; that’s historical fact, confirmed by intelligence agencies across multiple administrations, both Democrat and Republican. If we’re going to claim we’ve obliterated that infrastructure, we better be ready to prove it. Because if the claim is untrue, Iran doesn’t back down. It doubles down. And make no mistake: retaliation is not just possible; it’s likely. Maybe not with a mushroom cloud, but through asymmetrical warfare, cyberattacks, or proxy engagements. Our troops in the region, our allies, even our homeland become targets. And all based on a political headline. If the obliteration never happened, we haven’t stopped anything. We’ve lit a fuse. There’s another layer to this: what message are we sending to our own people? That strategic military action can be claimed by press release? By a social media post? That nuclear diplomacy is a matter of belief, not evidence? The risk here isn’t just retaliation from Iran; it’s erosion of trust at home. Americans don’t want to be lied to about war. About nuclear threats. About whether they and their families are safe. And yet, right now, they’re being asked to take the president’s word for it—again, without any transparency or oversight. That’s not leadership. That’s not national security. That’s propaganda masquerading as policy. We, the American people, deserve clarity. If this mission was real and successful, the facts must be shared—at least with congressional leadership and appropriate intelligence committees. If it was not, then we need to be honest about that, too. Because there’s no room for ego or exaggeration when it comes to nuclear weapons. There’s no margin for error. And there’s no political win that’s worth stumbling blindly into war. It doesn’t matter what party you belong to, or who you support. What matters is truth. Because in this game, the cost of being wrong isn’t just embarrassment; it’s lives. And history will not forgive a country that chose optics over evidence when the stakes are this high. Meidas+ is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support our work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. PLEASE… THIS IS A CRITICAL PERSONAL APPEAL! JOIN ME. STAND WITH THIS COMMUNITY. WE CANNOT DO THIS ALONE. If you’re reading this, you’re already part of the resistance. You believe in truth. In justice. In dragging the roaches of corruption into the light. But let me be brutally honest: I can’t do this without you. This isn't just another newsletter; it's a war cry. A movement. A battering ram aimed at the liars, the grifters, and the authoritarian wannabes hijacking our democracy. And we need to grow this platform into a voice so loud, so relentless, that they can’t spin it, silence it, or shut it down. I’m calling on you—not passively asking, but urgently demanding—to fuel this fight. We are the last line of defense between democracy and dictatorship. And yes, as a small token of my appreciation, the first 240 Founding Members will receive a signed, numbered, limited Substack edition of my New York Times bestseller, Revenge: How Donald Trump Weaponized the U.S. Department of Justice Against His Critics. It’s not just a collector’s item. It’s a declaration of where you stood when history came calling. Michael Cohen Principal of Crisis-X #1 and #8 NYT Bestseller Author Host of The Mea Culpa Podcast Co-Host of The Political Beatdown Former Personal Attorney To President Donald J. Trump Discharged Felon But this isn’t about a book. This is about defiance. About refusing to be gaslit. About locking arms and shouting back at the madness. Here’s how you can raise your voice: Become a supporter today. Forward this post to people who won’t sit on the sidelines. Bring your crew. Grow this community. Be the megaphone. You want to make a difference? This is your moment. Rise up. Speak out. Show up. Because if we don’t fight for truth, no one will. And if we do it together? They’ll never drown us out. Let’s be impossible to ignore. Let’s be un-fucking-breakable. Join now. Share widely. Let’s go. Meidas+ is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support our work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.