Tuesday, October 18, 2022

Meet the candidates for Barnstable County Commission

 

Meet the candidates for Barnstable County Commission

Heather McCarron
Cape Cod Times

October 18, 2022


In the race for Barnstable County Commissioner, incumbent Democrat Ronald Bergstrom is challenged by Republican and former commissioner Ronald Beaty Jr.

The three-member commission oversees Cape Cod's county government, which comprises all 15 towns. According to the 2020 U.S. Census, Barnstable County is the ninth most populated county in the state out of 14 counties, with 228,996 residents.

County commissioners serve four-year terms, which are staggered so that all three positions don't come up for election at the same time.

Below find more information about each of the candidates in this race, and their answers to questions posed to them by the Times about their campaigns. The candidates' responses are listed in the order the candidates appear on the ballot.

Incumbent Barnstable County Commissioner Ronald Bergstrom is seeking re-election to his seat on the commission.

RONALD BERGSTROM is the current vice chairman of the commission.

Age: 73

Town of residence: Chatham

Education: New York City Catholic schools. Some college.

Employment: Commercial shellfishing

Political Experience: County Commissioner 2019-present, Assembly of Delegates 2007-2019, Chatham Selectman 1998-2010, Cape Cod Commission 2020-Present,   past chairman of Cape Cod Regional Transit Authority

Other Civic/Community Service Experience: President: Cape Cod Selectmen and Councilors Association 2004-2005, Friends Of Chatham Waterways 2010-present

Why are you running for Barnstable County Commissioner?

I am running for another term as Barnstable County commissioner to build on the work I have already done, making our regional government a force for improving the well-being of all Cape Codders. 

I want the county to continue providing efficient, cost-effective regional services that save our towns money, limiting the tax burden on our residents.

I want to continue the spirit of nonpartisanship that Cape Codders expect from their public officials, bringing together all segments of our population to meet the challenges we face going forward: lack of affordable housing, threats to our water quality, sea level rise threatening our shoreline and inappropriate development at odds with the Cape's rural character. 

I am extremely fortunate to have landed here almost a half-century ago and I am asking voters to extend to me the privilege of continuing the work of keeping Cape Cod the welcoming and attractive place that we all appreciate.

What, are the most pressing issue the county is facing and how would you address it?

The most pressing issue Barnstable County is facing is the overall threat to the quality of the Cape’s environment. Wastewater management is at the forefront of the challenges due to increased density affecting our saltwater estuaries and freshwater ponds and lakes.

As someone who has made his living around the shore, I am determined to have the county government take a leadership role in protecting our waters from chemical pollution and nutrient overloading. In my role as both county commissioner and a member of the Cape Cod Commission, I will oversee the progress of our $2.5 million initiative to monitor the health of the Cape’s freshwater bodies and support the continued distribution of federal ARPA funds to local and regional wastewater mitigation projects.

What differentiates you from your opponent? Why should people vote for Ronald Bergstrom? 

Unlike my opponent, I am not looking for a platform to expound on hot-button national issues that divide people. I am not seeking a soapbox or a megaphone. Although I certainly have strong opinions on the issues facing our country, as county commissioner I have a laser focus on bringing together our town governments, civic organizations and nonprofits to find local solutions to local problems.

My long and varied experience in municipal government has taught me not just what must be done, but how to get it done. And that calls for collaboration with, and respect for, all participants in our society, here on Cape Cod and as a nation.

What are the main responsibilities of the commission? 

I am running for the position of Barnstable County commissioner to do the job of Barnstable County commissioner, a role that includes paying attention to the details as well as setting overall policy.

Financial oversight is a primary responsibility and I can say with pride that, despite charges to the contrary, the county has been fiscally conservative with pubic funds and has ended each budget cycle in the black without even a hint of raising the deeds tax or the towns' assessments.

My role also includes oversight of county administration and our staff of full- and part-time employees, as well as hundreds of volunteers. They work tirelessly for all of us and they deserve our support and respect.

What other information about yourself would you like to share?

My approach to local issues is founded on the belief that we are all fortunate to live on this peninsula, and that will always be my guiding principle. At the same time, we should recognize that there are some among us who need assistance just to meet their daily needs. 

County government has an important role in addressing chronic issues such as homelessness, substance abuse and mental health and so, if elected to another term as county commissioner, I will both work to preserve the heritage passed down to us and also help all our residents share in the enjoyment of living on Cape Cod.

WEBSITE: https://www.electronbergstrom.org/

EMAIL:  ron@electronbergstrom.org

Ronald Beaty is running for Barnstable County Commissioner.

RONALD BEATY, JR.

Age: 61

Town of residence: West Barnstable

Education: B.A. in American Studies, M.S. in Administrative Studies from Boston College; M.Ed. in Educational Technology from Lesley University; Current Master of Arts Degree Candidate in Political Science (with a Concentration in Public Administration and Public Policy) completed 24 credits thus far with a 4.0 GPA

Employment: 28 years of experience in real estate management 

Political Experience: Former Barnstable County Commissioner (2017-2021); longtime prominent regional community activist on numerous issues of importance; longtime open meeting law advocate dedicated to maintaining the public transparency and accountability of state, county and local governmental bodies.

Other Civic/Community Service Experience: Board of Directors, Cape & Vineyard Electric Cooperative; Governing Board, Cape Cod Water Protection Collaborative; Board of Directors (Chief Elected Officer), Cape & Islands Workforce Investment Board; Executive Board, Barnstable County Economic Development Council; AmeriCorps Advisory Board; Barnstable County Health and Human Services Advisory Council

Why are you running for Barnstable County Commissioner?

I have decided to run for county commissioner in order to restore some semblance of balance, transparency, and fiscal sanity to our Cape Cod regional government.

 Additionally, for the past year, the current 100% progressive Democrat-controlled Board of County Commissioners has been waging a self-destructive political war with the legislative branch of our county government, the Assembly of Delegates.

 During the past year, the county commissioners and the Assembly of Delegates have been completely at odds on how to spend $41 million in the federal COVID relief funds, as well as coming to a sensible agreement on the Fiscal Year 2023 county operating budget. They have made threats against one another about filing lawsuits over these issues. This is not how a regional government should be acting. It should be acting in the best interests of the taxpayers, voters, and citizens of Cape Cod, not as a dysfunctional entity at war with itself.

 As a former county commissioner, I have the requisite experience and qualifications to help set things right with Barnstable County government as well as reign in the excessive out-of-control spending of the past year, along with putting the brakes on the unnecessary bureaucratic expansion it has undergone.

Cape Cod voters who believe in limited government, fiscal responsibility, lower taxes, transparency and accountability, as well as protecting the public interest, and want to help restore these key principles to our Cape Cod regional government should know I represent the best opportunity to achieve these objectives.

What is the most pressing issue the county is facing and how would you address it?

Surging housing prices have grown to be a shocking dilemma throughout Massachusetts; however, on Cape Cod in particular, the crunch is even more critical. While the peninsula’s profound attractiveness and shorelines make it an appealing venue for the wealthy to indulge in holiday residences, it has also forced up home costs so dramatically that the year-round population is battling to survive.

Barnstable County continues to suffer from a dearth of affordable housing in general, and a shortage of affordable rental housing specifically. Affordable, diverse, smaller-scale rental housing is needed throughout the county. The gap between the median annual income and the cost of housing continues to widen at the same time as average household size declines on Cape Cod generally, creating a demand for smaller units affordable to the county's population.

One approach to expand Cape Cod's housing supply and boost the quantity of small units is by forthrightly enhancing the present housing stock with accessory dwelling units (ADUs). The American Planning Association depicts ADUs as smaller, autonomous residential dwelling units situated on the same lot as a single-family home.

ADUs can be a significant means to strengthen housing affordability here, where a profusion of seasonal housing units sit vacant for a great deal of the year. In those areas of the county with reduced infrastructure and vulnerable habitats, particularly in the more rural portions, ADUs will be an ongoing and important component of meeting Barnstable County's housing affordability question.

What would he say differentiates you from your opponent? Why should people vote for Ronald Beaty? 

For the position in question, I am the only sensible conservative candidate who values limited government, fiscal responsibility, individual liberty and adherence to the Massachusetts and U. S. constitutions.

Unlike my opponent, I am a knowledgeable open meeting law advocate, and Cape area community and political activist relating to a range of issues, such as county government fiscal matters, restructuring, county-level recall election provision issues, the Cape Cod Commission and its land use planning activities, wastewater and water quality policy, housing and zoning legislation, as well as illegal immigration, to name but a few of the important issues I have confronted. 

I am a lifelong resident of the Cape who possesses the graduate-level education, and professional real estate experience to make well-informed decisions.

Also unlike my opponent, if elected, I will work hard to reduce taxes at all levels, downsize and help remove the regulatory burden of government, and reduce the unnecessarily high cost of living for Cape Cod residents wherever and whenever possible. Moreover, I am a loyal ally of Cape Cod taxpayers who staunchly defends our free enterprise system and will actively seek to create a positive and friendly business environment within the 15 towns of the Cape. Pursuing a sensible approach to economic development on Cape Cod will be one of my top priorities because that is the key to halting the continuing outflow of the Cape’s younger generation. 

What are the main responsibilities of the commission? 

The Barnstable County Board Regional Commissioners is the executive branch of our Cape Cod regional government. In accordance with the county charter, their main responsibilities are: direction of county agencies, preparation of budgets for submittal to the Assembly of Delegates (the county legislature), care of county property, supervision of revenue collection and fund disbursement, reporting on the financial and administrative condition of the county, proposal of measures for assembly action, power to veto ordinances, and appointment and removal of the county administrator and all county employees. These are their main responsibilities.

What other information about yourself would you like to share?

Unlike the present Board of County Commissioners, I strongly support our police departments, and firmly believe that the Cape Cod Police Training Academy should be fully supported and responsibly funded to help ensure public safety in our respective Cape communities!

When elected, I will immediately begin to excise the bureaucratic cancer that apparently infests our Barnstable County government as well as remove the rampant waste and abuse that has unquestionably become the hallmark of the progressive Democrats currently in control.

Furthermore, as a consumer advocate, I believe that Cape Codders have the right to be free from outrageous food, housing, and gasoline prices! They also have the right to be protected from unfair and deceptive practices, including those perpetuated by the Biden administration!

 As an advocate for parental rights in education, I believe that parents have the right to know what their children are being taught. Parents have the right to be heard, protect their kid’s privacy, and keep them safe. I suggest that the mission of public schools is supposed to be the education of children, not indoctrination and controlling what they think! Teaching children right from wrong is the parent's responsibility, not the public school system's.

WEBSITE: https://www.ronbeaty.com/

EMAIL: ronbeaty@gmail.com


COMMENTS: 

They left out, "Convicted Felon" from Beaty profile.

Beaty, Oath Keeper, Cape Cod Nazi and overall sick candidate. Anybody including my dog over Beaty.

Your DOG should run as a write in! LOL! You left out: didn't pay his taxes, filed for bankruptcy, threw temper tantrum when someone parked briefly in his parking space, drew out of state contributions to his opponent when the Dim Wit attacked victims of a school shooting - thought he could run for state office - THINK AGAIN! attacked office holders who are GAY.... The Dim Wit misquoted a proposed bill, used the wrong bill #, misrepresented what it said. When I tracked down the legislation & made him aware, his incoherent response was filled with mispelling and incorrect information. BEATY counts on his blind followers to not FACT CHECK his misinformation. Don't be fooled and lazy like Daniel S. DO YOUR HOMEWORK! UNFIT TO SERVE IN ANY PUBLIC OFFICE!

I support Mr. Bergstrom's advocacy for improving water quality on Cape Cod. To me, that is the primary issue facing the region - clean water drives our economy and quality of life.

I don't want Mr. Beatty anywhere near a decision-making seat. His past is littered with incredibly poor choices - I vote for reasonable people, regardless of political persuasion.

Daniel S quoted BEATY'S nonsense...
excerpt:
Also, how do you square the exponential increase in fentanyl addiction with your support of an open southern border given that 95% of fentanyl comes into US via Mexico from China?


Imagine not reading the article and simply parroting more of Bloviant Ron's drivel.

If you HAD read the article, this might have caught your eye:


Unlike my opponent, I am not looking for a platform to expound on hot-button national issues that divide people. I am not seeking a soapbox or a megaphone. Although I certainly have strong opinions on the issues facing our country, as county commissioner I have a laser focus on bringing together our town governments, civic organizations and nonprofits to find local solutions to local problems.

Local Solutions for Local Problems. Meaning things he can help remedy for ALL residents of Barnstable County. Unlike Bloviant Ron, who's just going to continue blaming everyone else...


BEATY attacked school shooting victims and as a consequence drew out of state contributions that supported his opponent for state office and defeated him! 






RSN: How Liberals Should Confront a Right-Wing Supreme Court

 

 

Reader Supported News
18 October 22

Live on the homepage now!
Reader Supported News

FUNDRAISING: HATE IT, BUT DON’T IGNORE IT. — Everyone Hates Fundraising. You hate it and we hate it too. But if you ignore it the organization rapidly becomes destabilized and everything we all value is jeopardized. The pain and agony related to fundraising are always a result of the appeals being totally ignored. The answer is reasonable support. When we say we’re in trouble, we are.
Marc Ash • Founder, Reader Supported News

Sure, I'll make a donation!

 

Justice Brett Kavanaugh and Chief Justice John Roberts. (photo: Getty Images)
How Liberals Should Confront a Right-Wing Supreme Court
Joseph Fishkin and William E. Forbath, The New York Times
Excerpt: "For American progressives, the Supreme Court has become a maddening institution. The comforting notion of the court as umpire lies in tatters."

READ MORE


Secret Service Met With Oath Keepers Before January 6, Official ConfirmsMembers of the United States Secret Service stand guard as Marine One carrying President Donald Trump lifts off from the South Lawn of the White House on Sept. 12, 2019, in Washington. (photo: Jabin Botsford/WP)

Secret Service Met With Oath Keepers Before January 6, Official Confirms
Graeme Massie, The Independent
Massie writes: "Secret Service agents met with members of the right-wing extremist Oath Keepers group prior to the violent January 6 insurrection, according to a report."

Secret Service agents met with members of the right-wing extremist Oath Keepers group prior to the violent January 6 insurrection, according to a report.

A Secret Service spokesperson told CNN that the agency had contact with the extremist group, whose founder and other members are currently on trial, as part of its standard intelligence-gathering duties.

The official told CNN that members of the extremist group had occasionally reached out to the agency regarding items that they were allowed to bring to rallies.

“We are aware that individuals from the Oath Keepers have contacted us in the past to make inquiries,” Secret Service spokesman Anthony Guglielmi told the news organisation.

The official stated that it was commonplace for agents to also reach out and contact the group when they found out they would be attending events and demonstrations.

The Secret Service’s relationship with the group has been brought up in the trial of the group’s leader Stewart Rhodes.

A court heard that Mr Rhodes had claimed he was in contact with a Secret Service agent in the months leading up to the January 6 attack on the US Capitol by Donald Trump’s supporters.

John Zimmerman, a former member of the group, testified in the trial of Mr Rhodes and four other Oath Keepers who are charged with seditious conspiracy in what prosecutors have described as a plot to use force to stop the transfer of presidential power from Mr Trump to Democrat Joe Biden, who won the election.

Mr Zimmerman told a jury that he witnessed a phone call between Mr Rhodes and a purported Secret Service agent in September 20202 at a Trump rally in Fayetteville, North Carolina.

Mr Zimmerman could not say for sure that Mr Rhodes was speaking to someone with the Secret Service — only that Rhodes told him he was — and it was not clear what they were discussing.

Mr Zimmerman said Mr Rhodes wanted to find out the “parameters” that the Oath Keepers could operate under during the election-year rally.

Rhodes, from Granbury Texas, and four associates are being tried on a Civil War-era charge punishable by a maximum of 20 years in prison.

The others are Thomas Caldwell of Berryville, Virginia; Kenneth Harrelson of Titusville, Florida; Jessica Watkins of Woodstock, Ohio; and Kelly Meggs of Dunnellon, Florida.

Hours after Mr Guglielmi’s comments to CNN, the Secret Service was thrust into the spotlight at the latest January 6 committee hearing.

Emails released at the hearing showed that the Secret Service was aware of plans for violence on 6 January 2021.


READ MORE

CDC Officials Describe Intense Pressure, Job Threats From Trump White House
Dan Diamond, The Washington Post
Diamond writes: "Trump appointees oversaw a concerted effort to restrict immigration at the U.S.-Mexico border during the pandemic, change scientific reports and muzzle top officials at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, according to emails, text messages and interviews gathered by a congressional panel probing the pandemic response."
READ MORE

Missiles, Exploding Drones Again Hit Ukraine's Power, Water
Hanna Arhirova, Associated Press
Arhirova writes: "Airstrikes cut power and water supplies to hundreds of thousands of Ukrainians on Tuesday, part of what the country's president called an expanding Russian campaign to drive the nation into the cold and dark and make peace talks impossible."
READ MORE

Supreme Court Declines to Consider Challenge to Racist Citizenship Laws
Jess Zalph and Nina Totenberg, NPR
Excerpt: "The Supreme Court on Monday refused to reconsider the so-called 'Insular Cases,' a series of cases decided in the early 1900s that are infamous today for their racist foundation."
READ MORE

Oakland Cops Hope to Arm Robots With Lethal Shotguns
Sam Biddle, The Intercept
Biddle writes: "In a series of little noted Zoom meetings this fall, the city of Oakland, California, grappled with a question whose consequences could shape the future of American policing: Should cops be able to kill people with shotgun-armed robots?"
READ MORE


Study: Climate Anxiety Is Spreading All Over the Planet"New research reveals that these anxieties are not just Western concerns - they're common among young people on nearly every continent." (photo: K.M. Chaudary/AP)

Study: Climate Anxiety Is Spreading All Over the Planet
Kate Yoder, Grist
Yoder writes: "If you're feeling anxious about climate change, the common wisdom goes, there's an antidote: Take action."


The broadest look yet shows it's not just a Western worry.


If you’re feeling anxious about climate change, the common wisdom goes, there’s an antidote: Take action. Maybe you can alleviate your worries by doing something positive, like going to a protest, becoming an advocate for mass transit, or trying to get an environmental champion elected.

New research reveals that these anxieties are not just Western concerns — they’re common among young people on nearly every continent — but that the ability to do something about them depends on where you live. “The question is whether you have the opportunity or not to engage in those behaviors,” said Charles Ogunbode, a psychologist at the University of Nottingham in the United Kingdom.

The study, recently published in the Journal of Environmental Psychology, takes the broadest look yet at climate anxiety around the globe. Ogunbode and researchers all over the world surveyed more than 10,000 university students in 32 countries, asking how climate change made them feel. They found that it was hurting people’s mental health virtually everywhere, from Brazil to Uganda, Portugal to the Philippines.

Almost half of the young people surveyed said they were “very” or “extremely” worried about climate change. Nearly a quarter felt “terrified,” and even more felt either “very” or “extremely” anxious. Previous research has suggested that climate anxiety is widespread: Last year, a survey in 11 countries around the world found that 45 percent of teens and young adults said that climate anxiety was affecting their daily lives and ability to function.

“Climate anxiety” has become a catch-all for how worries about our overheating planet affect people’s mental health. Experts say that feeling grief, fear, and anxiety is a logical response to the catastrophic situation. But some researchers have argued that the phrase “climate anxiety” is ambiguous — a buzzword, not a clinical diagnosis — and that it tends to resonate more with white and wealthy people than those experiencing the most severe effects of climate disasters.

While the study didn’t look at how people respond to the phrase itself, the results show that it’s not just those in wealthier countries like the United States who are wrestling with tough emotions as a result of climate change. Ogunbode thinks developing countries should play a bigger part in the conversation, since the link between emotions and mental health is “just as strong” as it is in rich countries.

“We very rarely find anyone talking about how people in Ghana or the Philippines feel about climate change,” he said. “It’s almost like, ‘Look, as long as we can provide the basic stuff — people can eat, they have a place to sleep, they have water — that’s it. That’s fine.’”

The new study found that across the board, people’s concerns about climate change motivated them to want to take action. But anxiety played a role in motivating people to adopt environmentally-friendly behaviors, especially in richer, more individualistic countries — places where people are more likely to fly carbon-guzzling planes or drive large cars for small trips.

The most apparent barriers to direct action were political. It’s not as easy to protest climate change in a country that doesn’t protect the right to free speech or demonstrations. People worrying about the climate were more likely to engage in demonstrations in just under half of the countries studied, most of them in Europe. The connection was the strongest in Finland, one of the world’s most democratic countries, and the weakest in China, among the world’s least.

In three-quarters of the countries studied, climate anxiety appears to lead to eco-friendly behaviors — avoiding food waste, for instance, or walking and biking instead of driving. The exceptions were Egypt, Iran, Japan, Malaysia, Oman, Pakistan, and Tanzania.

In some places, people don’t have access to much information about what kind of actions are effective, Ogunbode said. Looking at open-ended responses to the survey, people in countries like the Philippines and Malaysia indicated that the survey questions themselves — about saving energy and reducing waste — had provided them with new information, Ogunbode said. “I got the sense that a lot of people only realized when they were reading through the questions, ‘Oh, maybe there’s something I can be doing.’”


READ MORE

 

Contribute to RSN

Follow us on facebook and twitter!

Update My Monthly Donation

PO Box 2043 / Citrus Heights, CA 95611







THIS IS A REMINDER: 80 Ways Nuke Power Is a Catastrophic Failure

 

A worker at the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant. (photo: James Martin/CNET)
A worker at the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant. (photo: James Martin/CNET

80 Ways Nuke Power Is a Catastrophic Failure

By Harvey Wasserman, Reader Supported News

27 April 21

his year’s Earth Day summit (April 22) and Joe Biden’s pledge to halve American carbon emissions by 2030 come with the 35th commemoration (April 26) of the Chernobyl catastrophe.

Together they evoke atomic power’s epic failure in at least 80 different ways: 


  • Atomic reactors are radioactive fires directly heating the Earth at 571 degrees Fahrenheit.

  • So far they’ve delivered five super-hot apocalyptic explosions (one at Chernobyl, four at Fukushima) with innumerable other close calls … past, present & future ...

  • At Chalk River, SR-1, Three Mile Island, Church Rock, Davis-Besse, Chernobyl, Fukushima, and all other nuke “incidents,” the only absolute certainty is that government and industry officials are lying.

  • According to Mikhail Gorbachev, such lies about Chernobyl – and its devastating impacts – were the primary cause of the demise of the Soviet Union. (To get a sense of the accident, watch the devastating 5-part HBO series at https://www.hbo.com/chernobyl.)

  • It is impossible to meaningfully calculate the human, climate, political, or financial costs of the next major reactor disaster in the US or anywhere else on this planet.

  • As they badly age, more atomic reactors will explode.

  • In 1952, Harry Truman’s Blue Ribbon Paley Commission Report on the future of energy predicted that the US would be powered by renewables, and that there would be 15,000,000 solar-heated homes in the US by 1975.

  • But in December, 1953, Dwight Eisenhower announced a “Peaceful Atom” program that would come through the bomb-producing Atomic Energy Commission, which proceeded to squander the hundreds of billions of dollars that might otherwise have given us a green-powered economy, avoiding much of the climate crisis.

  • The 1957 promise of the Price-Anderson Act that commercial reactors would get private disaster insurance remains unfulfilled.

  • No nuclear proponent (including Bill Gates) has volunteered to personally insure the reactors they advocate.

  • You are personally liable for the loss of your family, health, and home (check your homeowner’s policy) should they be destroyed by reactor fallout.

  • In a true free-market energy economy with zero subsidies to fossil, nuclear, or renewable energy, renewables would quickly prevail.

  • The most meaningful nuke power debate now centers not on future construction, but on the deteriorating safety of each individual aging reactor, any one of which could be melting as you read this.

  • The gargantuan radioactive, heat, and toxic chemical emissions at (with the April 30th shutdown of Indian Point) 93 US reactors and some 440 reactors worldwide directly devastate our oceans, lakes, rivers, and air whenever they operate.

  • The billions of gallons of radioactive liquids accumulated and still being leaked at Fukushima directly threaten the Pacific Ocean.

  • Fukushima emitted more than 100 times more radioactive cesium than did the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

  • The nuclear industry cannot account for the climate impacts of the heat generated by the explosions at Chernobyl and Fukushima.

  • All atomic reactors directly emit radioactive carbon 14, a devastating global warmer.

  • All atomic reactors cause massive carbon emissions in fuel production.

  • Reactor wastes stay hot and deadly for a quarter-billion years.

  • Since nobody knows how to deal with reactor wastes, nobody can firmly estimate their future climate impacts.

  • The ultimate financial costs of managing those reactor wastes cannot be meaningfully calculated.

  • Decommissioning funds, allegedly set aside to dismantle shutting reactors, have been looted throughout the world, leaving reactor corpses to smolder for centuries to come. The certain climate impacts of operating reactors far exceed those of wind, solar, batteries, and increased efficiency.

  • The combined deployment of wind, solar, batteries, and efficiency can provide all of humankind’s electricity long before any new reactor buildup.

  • Renewables and efficiency are far cheaper, cleaner, safer, more reliable, quicker to deploy, and create more jobs per dollar than atomic power.

  • There are no proven prototypes of fusion, thorium, or small modular reactors indicating any chance they could solve the climate emergency as quickly, cheaply, or reliably as renewables.

  • The accident at Three Mile Island turned a $900 million asset into a $2 billion liability within minutes.

  • The cost of the Chernobyl catastrophe exceeded $1 trillion.

  • The disaster at Fukushima immediately destroyed some $60 billion in net present value (6 reactors x $10 billion each).

  • The disaster at Fukushima represents the biggest single immediate destruction of tangible invested capital in human history.

  • Heightened energy costs due to post-Fukushima nuke shutdowns and Japan’s failure to convert to renewables are in the trillions and rising.

  • After years of construction, having generated not a single electron of electricity, South Carolina’s two V.C. Summer reactors have been abandoned at a cost of more than $10 billion.

  • At least one top South Carolina utility executive involved with the V.C. Summer fiasco will go to prison for misleading the public on construction progress.

  • After years of construction, Georgia’s two new Vogtle reactors are still not operating, despite more than $28 billion in sunk capital, more than double the original cost estimate.

  • There are no other new large atomic reactors credibly proposed or under construction in the US.

  • No new reactor built in the US could compete with renewables and efficiency.

  • Despite full amortization, all the 93 US reactors currently licensed to operate produce power that costs more than wind and solar when decommissioning, waste storage, and likely future accidents are factored in.

  • Building enough large new reactors in the US to theoretically combat global warming would take decades and cost trillions.

  • But trying to do so would come with no guarantee that those reactors would actually reduce global warming, because of the heat, carbon, toxic wastes, radiation, and periodic explosions they would create.

  • No effective mass evacuation is possible from an explosion at any American reactor.

  • New York governor Andrew Cuomo shut two Indian Point reactors near New York City by characterizing their evacuation plan as “swim to New Jersey.”

  • New York governor Andrew Cuomo has kept four ancient, dangerous, money-losing reactors operating with a $7 billion bailout.

  • One of the bailed-out NY reactors, Nine Mile Point, opened in 1969, and, like many other old US reactors, was designed pre-digitally.

  • The average age of a licensed US reactor is now over forty.

  • A $1 billion bailout for two ancient, deteriorated reactors in Ohio was bought with a $61 million bribe to the speaker of the Ohio House of Representatives, who then spread around much of the cash to buy the votes he needed for the bailout.

  • Nuclear industry thugs physically assaulted signature gatherers circulating a petition to repeal Ohio’s nuke bailout with a public referendum, which polls showed Ohio voters would have overwhelmingly approved.

  • Money-losing, climate-killing reactors are being kept open throughout the US with similar bribes to corrupt state legislatures.

  • Reactors throughout the US are dangerously embrittled, meaning key internal components will shatter when a melt-down requires pouring in cooling water, leading (at least!) to massive hydrogen explosions, as at Fukushima.

  • The exploding reactors at Fukushima were designed by General Electric, with many duplicate models now operating in the US.

  • Among the most embrittled US reactors is California’s Diablo Canyon Unit One, which is surrounded by a dozen earthquake faults, including the San Andreas, just 45 miles away.

  • Diablo Canyon is half the distance from the San Andreas fault Fukushima was from the epicenter of the earthquake that destroyed it.

  • The concrete is crumbling at New Hampshire’s Seabrook reactor, among others.

  • The shield wall at Ohio’s Davis-Besse is crumbling and could collapse onto critical safety components, leading to a catastrophic disaster.

  • Boric acid ate almost entirely through a critical safety component of the Davis-Besse reactor before workers discovered the problem by accident.

  • When atomic reactors open, nearby infant death rates rise.

  • When atomic reactors shut, nearby infant death rates drop.

  • The 1979 meltdown at Pennsylvania’s Three Mile Island Unit Two killed downwind humans, animals, and plants.

  • The nuke industry compares TMI’s emissions to a single x-ray imposed on all area residents, thus admitting that pregnant women were exposed to doses definitively linked to childhood cancers as early as the 1950s.

  • Epidemiological studies conducted by central Pennsylvania residents involving more than 500 households showed definitive human health impacts from the accident.

  • A three-person Baltimore News-American team reported mass deaths and malformations among farm and wild animals downwind from TMI.

  • Central Pennsylvania farmers reported crop and tree die-offs after the TMI accident.

  • Chernobyl killed more than a million humans.

  • Chernobyl’s fallout caused an apocalyptic wave of aborted pregnancies, infant still-births, childhood cancers, birth defects, malformations, and mutations.

  • Fukushima’s emissions are harming humans throughout Japan, as shown in particular by studies of widespread thyroid problems.

  • Radioactive hot spots caused by Fukushima’s fallout are being confirmed throughout Japan, making it criminally irresponsible to proceed with the summer Olympics there.

  • All atomic reactors kill billions of fish and other marine creatures with heat, radiation, and toxic chemical emissions.

  • Construction at Diablo Canyon destroyed the abalone population at Avila Beach before the reactors ever operated.

  • No wind turbine or solar panel ever killed a fish (not even the ones that fly).

  • Fossil/nuclear cooling towers, automobiles, and high-rise buildings kill millions of birds; feral cats have killed billions.

  • The global average for bird kills at wind farms dropped radically when old-style turbines at Altamont Pass, California, were replaced with bigger, monopole designs.

  • Bird kills at modern wind farms plummet when one of two or three blades is painted black, making them more visible.

  • Solar panels installed atop reservoirs and aqueducts, such as the water supply network in California, can radically curtail evaporation, saving billions of critical gallons over time (solar panels also operate more efficiently when they are cooled).

  • Cooling water shortages threaten reactor operations all over the world.

  • Reactors in France and elsewhere have been forced shut due to riverine water becoming too hot to cool them.

  • Feedwater pumps at the South Texas Nuclear Plant recently froze, threatening a major disaster.

  • The wind turbines that recently froze in Texas were not up to the specifications of other wind turbines worldwide (as in Wisconsin and Colorado) that could easily have withstood that cold wave.

  • Energy losses in Texas from frozen nuke and fossil fuel facilities far exceeded those from the frozen wind turbines.

  • Solar panels installed on rooftops avoid transmission losses suffered by all central generating stations, making them far more efficient than those installed in deserts and other remote locations.

  • The National Renewable Energy Lab estimates there are more than 4.9 million square meters of rooftop space suitable for photovoltaic panels in the US.

  • Constant breakthroughs in solar, wind, battery, and efficiency technologies continue to steadily drive down their costs.

  • Inherent technological problems and continuing fuel supply challenges constantly escalate the costs for fossil/nuclear generators.

  • Atomic reactors were originally meant to put a happy face on the nuke weapons industry and to expand the domain of the Atomic Energy Commission, which both promoted and regulated them.

  • Despite treaties and denials, nations around the world now buying new reactors will use them to generate fissionable material for nuke weapons, as have India, Pakistan, etc.

  • Nuke reactors are de facto pre-deployed nuke weapons of mass destruction for rogue nations and terrorists.

  • No terrorist ever threatened to blow up a city by bombing a windmill or solar panel.

  • The Green New Deal and Solartopian Revolution will ultimately put the fossil/nuclear industry out of business, avoiding incalculable costs in climate-killing heat, radiation, toxic pollution, and more.

  • Retraining the fossil/nuke workforce will provide millions of safe, secure jobs for decades to come.
  • The Solartopian workforce needs to be unionized!

    … and that’s just for starters!!

    No Nukes!!! … and we’ll see you in Solartopia.



    Harvey Wasserman’s Solartopia! Our Green-Powered Earth is at www.solartopia.org, along with his new People’s Spiral of US History: From Jigonsaseh to Solartopia. In 1974 he helped coin the phrase “No Nukes!” With Joel Segal, he co-convenes the weekly Grassroots Emergency Election Protection Zooms, Mondays, at 5 p.m. Eastern Time (www.electionprotection2024.org).

    Reader Supported News is the Publication of Origin for this work. Permission to republish is freely granted with credit and a link back to Reader Supported News.


    LINK

    Top News | 'He’s Not Going to Run Unopposed': Sanders Rejects Schumer for Majority Leader

                                                                   LOTS OF POSTS IGNORED BY BLOGGER..... OR REMOVED ON THEIR WHIM! ALL POSTS ARE...