Heather Cox Richardson
UNDER CONSTRUCTION - MOVED TO MIDDLEBORO REVIEW AND SO ON https://middlebororeviewandsoon.blogspot.com/
Heather Cox Richardson
Waving Hands for Donations — Help
No movement at all at this point on donations. “Someone else,” is not the answer. We cannot serve a million readers a month with 350 donating. Not fair, not possible.
What does it take?
Marc Ash
Founder, Reader Supported News
If you would prefer to send a check:
Reader Supported News
PO Box 2043
Citrus Hts, CA 95611
It's Live on the HomePage Now:
Reader Supported News
Police Officers Shouldn't Be the Ones to Enforce Traffic Laws
Sarah A. Seo, The New York Times
Seo writes:
Automated technology and unarmed monitors could do most of the job more efficiently and more safely.
hen Daunte Wright was fatally shot by an officer during a traffic stop near Minneapolis this week, he joined a long list of people who have died at the hands of the police after being pulled over for a traffic violation. Traffic stops should not be harrowing or dangerous experiences, but too often they are for people of color.
One way to address this problem is to reduce the number of encounters that drivers have with police officers. At the same time, any responsible reform must account for the fact that accidents involving motor vehicles are a leading cause of death for Americans under the age of 54. Road safety is itself a serious problem, one that requires laws and regulations that must be enforced.
How can we reduce traffic stops without undermining public safety? The solution is to decrease our reliance on human enforcement. Having police officers implement traffic laws is not the only way to promote road safety. Indeed, the evidence suggests that it is not even the optimal way to do so.

Protesters in Chicago during a peaceful protest in response to the video release of the fatal police shooting of 13-year-old Adam Toledo. (photo: Shafkat Anowar/AP)
Protests Erupt in US Cities Over Police Violence as Riot Declared in Portland
Oliver Laughland, Guardian UK
Laughland writes: "After a heated week of police violence, protests erupted in several US cities on Friday, at times turning tense."
Thousands marched in Chicago where 13-year-old Adam Toledo was killed while about 100 arrested in Brooklyn Center
fter a heated week of police violence, protests erupted in several US cities on Friday, at times turning tense.
In the wake of the killings of Daunte Wright, a 20-year-old shot by police after being pulled over, and unarmed 13-year-old Adam Toledo, thousands took to the streets to demonstrate, sometimes into the night.
In Chicago, where Adam was killed, thousands marched in Logan Square after the video of the 13-year-old being shot with his arms raised was released this week. The protesters planned to march to Mayor Lori Lightfoot’s home, some of them calling for her resignation.
The event was largely peaceful, though some police and protesters scuffled as the night drew to a close.
In the Minneapolis, Minnesota suburb of Brooklyn Center, protesters staged the sixth straight night of demonstrations outside the police headquarters. Smaller demonstrations also occurred in downtown Minneapolis.
Authorities had initially declined to declare an evening curfew, after quieter protests on the previous two nights. But after clashes between protesters and police in Brooklyn Center, during which authorities claimed a fence around the heavily fortified police headquarters was breached, an unlawful assembly was declared and 100 arrests were made.
Earlier in the evening, a US district judge ruled that Minnesota state patrol could not arrest, threaten or target journalists after an ACLU complaint that law enforcement was unfairly cracking down on working reporters.
But on Friday night a number of reporters documented being detained by police and released only after being photographed by officers with their press identification badges.
Meanwhile, a protest that began peacefully in California ended with multiple fires set, several cars damaged and numerous windows shattered.
The protest against police brutality in Oakland began calmly Friday night, news outlets reported. A subsequent march drew about 300 people.
People in the crowd threw bottles and other objects at officers during the march, Oakland police said in a statement. One officer suffered an injury from being struck in the head. A community member was also assaulted, police said.
But later, authorities declared an unlawful assembly and instructed demonstrators to leave. Police said the protesters dispersed peacefully. There were no arrests or citations issued.
In Portland, Oregon, police declared a riot on Friday night after demonstrations that followed police fatally shooting a local man while responding to reports of a person with a gun.
Some witnesses said the man was mentally ill, but Portland’s new street response team – created after last year’s protests to respond to mental crises without armed police – was not called.
Chris Davis, deputy police chief, told reporters earlier in the day that a white man in his 30s was shot and killed by police officer Zachary Delong, who opened fire with a gun and weapons that fire non-lethal projectiles. The man was pronounced dead at the scene in Lents Park, which is in a leafy, residential neighborhood of the city.
Two officers fired a 40mm device that shoots non-lethal projectiles, and one officer – an eight-year veteran – fired a gun, police said in a statement. The officer is on paid administrative leave, and his or her name will be released Saturday, authorities said.
As investigators scoured the scene and documented evidence, nearly 100 yards (91 meters) away, a crowd of more than 150 people – many dressed in all black and some carrying helmets, goggles and gas masks – gathered behind crime scene tape, chanting and yelling at the officers standing in front of them.
As police began to finish on-scene investigation around 3pm the crowd marched through the park, ripped down police tape and stood face to face with officers dressed in riot gear. Police left the park around 3.30pm, and the crowd remained and eventually stood in a nearby intersection, blocking traffic and chanting.
Police said later Friday they had used pepper spray on protesters in order to disengage. Some people hit officers with sticks and chased officers as they were leaving, police said in a news release. Officers deployed smoke canisters and then used a rubber ball distraction device, police said.
The Portland mayor, Ted Wheeler, has decried what he described as a segment of violent agitators who detract from the message of police accountability and should be subject to more severe punishment.
“We’ve had to summon just about every police officer in Multnomah county to keep this group far enough away to preserve what we refer to in our business as the integrity of the scene, so that nobody who shouldn’t be in there goes in there,” Davis said, adding that deputies with county sheriff’s office were also helping.

A migrant mother and her baby. (photo: AP)
White House Walks Back Order on Refugee Limits After Backlash
Barbara Sprunt, NPR
Sprunt writes: "The White House has walked back its announcement that it will keep this year's historically low refugee ceiling of 15,000 set by the Trump administration, saying its earlier statement Friday, which was panned by fellow Democrats, was meant only to ease restrictions from countries from which refugees are currently banned."
READ MORE

Immigrant children in a detention center. (photo: Ross D. Franklin)
'Nobody Would Tell Me Anything': Immigrant Parents Struggle to Find Children in US Custody
Dasha Burns and Julia Ainsley, NBC News
Excerpt: "Every night for the past three weeks, after finishing a long day of work, a Guatemalan father of two living in Kansas dials the same number, hoping to find his two daughters."
READ MORE

A rally for LGBT rights. (photo: Manuel Balce Ceneta/AP)
The Science Behind Those Anti-Trans Healthcare Bills Is Bullsh*t, According to Experts
Aviva Stahl, BuzzFeed
Stahl writes: "In late March, before Arkansas lawmakers officially blocked minors from obtaining gender-affirming medical care, Willow Breshears, an 18-year-old trans woman in Little Rock, spoke of her fears to a local news outlet: 'The people who are legislating [against] these trans kids have no grasp of what a trans experience is.'"
READ MORE

Medical staff attend to a patient infected with COVID-19. (photo: Thomas Samson/AP)
Covid-19 Deaths Pass Three Million Worldwide
BBC
Excerpt: "The milestone comes the day after the head of the World Health Organization (WHO) warned the world was 'approaching the highest rate of infection' so far."
READ MORE

Secretary of the Interior Deb Haaland. (photo: Tom Williams/CQ-Roll Call/Getty Images)
Secretary Deb Haaland Creates Climate Task Force With Interior Department; Orders Tribal Consultation
Native News Online
Excerpt: "U.S. Dept. of the Interior Secretary Deb Haaland on Friday issued two Secretarial Orders that will prioritize action on climate change throughout the Department."
The first Secretarial Order, SO 3399, establishes a Climate Task Force to coordinate work across the Interior Department, including accelerating renewable energy development and identifying actions to foster investments in energy communities. The Order also provides guidance on how science should be used in the decision-making process and improves transparency and public engagement in the Department’s decision-making process.
One key component of SO 3399 is the directive for the Interior Department to engage with tribes to seek their input through tribal consultation. The Order says, “Tribal consultation is a means to rectify this by recognizing the government-to-government relationship and considering Tribal interests in decision making.”
The Order additionally provides policy instruction to ensure that the level of National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) analysis across DOI bureaus is not diminished, that climate change is appropriately analyzed, and that Tribes and environmental justice communities are appropriately engaged.
"From day one, President Biden was clear that we must take a whole-of-government approach to tackle the climate crisis, strengthen the economy, and address environmental justice,” Interior Secretary Deb Haaland said. “At the Department of the Interior, I believe we have a unique opportunity to make our communities more resilient to climate change and to help lead the transition to a clean energy economy. These steps will align the Interior Department with the President’s priorities and better position the team to be a part of the climate solution.”
The second Secretarial Order, SO 3398, seeks to rectify the reckless Secretarial Orders issued during the Trump administration. SO 3398 revokes a series of Secretarial Orders issued in recent years that are inconsistent with the Department’s commitment to protect public health; conserve land, water, and wildlife; and elevate science. Collectively, those Orders tilted the balance of public land and ocean management without regard for climate change, equity, or community engagement. The new Order does not impact the Interior Department’s ongoing review of proposals for oil, gas, coal, and renewable energy development on public lands and waters.
“I know that signing Secretarial Orders alone won’t address the urgency of the climate crisis. But I’m hopeful that these steps will help make clear that we, as a Department, have a mandate to act,” added Secretary Haaland. “With the vast experience, talent, and ingenuity of our public servants at the Department of the Interior, I’m optimistic about what we can accomplish together to care for our natural resources for the benefit of current and future generations.”
The Injustice of Refusing to Contribute We Challenge Injustice All Day Long and we’ll challenge you too. We have a great site that many people come to but we are facing – serious adversity – because 1% of the readers will not contribute? That is wrong. It’s not that hard to donate. We need your help. Marc Ash If you would prefer to send a check: |
It's Live on the HomePage Now:
Reader Supported News
FOCUS: The Kafkaesque Nightmare of Attorney Steven Donziger, a Literal Prisoner of the Chevron Corporation
Steven Donziger and Luke Savage, Jacobin
Excerpt: "When human rights lawyer Steven Donziger won a multibillion-dollar lawsuit against the oil giant Chevron, the company retaliated by setting out to destroy Donziger's life. Now in his twentieth month of house arrest on the orders of a Chevron-linked judge, his Kafkaesque story is a window into the corrupt and corporate-captured US legal system."
uman rights lawyer Steven Donziger can rightly be called America’s first corporate political prisoner. Currently living through his twentieth month under house arrest, Donziger was part of a legal team that in 2011 won a historic, multibillion dollar lawsuit against oil giant Chevron over its activities in the Ecuadorian Amazon.
Donziger, however, was afforded little time to savor this victory — soon finding himself on the receiving end of an unprecedented smear campaign and legal offensive undertaken by the company, which has ultimately seen him languish in house arrest in his New York City home for over six hundred days without a trial. This state of affairs comes after an extremely dubious ruling by a judge with tobacco-industry ties who has repeatedly praised Chevron.
Donziger’s case has attracted support from around the world, with some fifty-five Nobel Laureates, hundreds of attorneys and legal organizations, and celebrities including Sting, Danny Glover, and Roger Waters condemning the corporate campaign against him. On May 10, he’ll be facing a misdemeanor contempt charge in a New York City court, the trial overseen by a judge who belongs to the Federalist Society — a right-wing group that quite literally counts Chevron among its donors.
Jacobin spoke with Donziger about his work exposing Chevron’s crimes against the people of Ecuador, his case, and the dangerous precedent it sets in allowing corporations to persecute, and prosecute, their critics.
LS: All of this began because you were part of a legal team that took action — successfully, I might add — against Chevron over its activities in Ecuador. Can you tell us about that lawsuit?
SD: I got involved in the case in April of 1993 when I was invited to join a delegation of lawyers and scientists to investigate what we had been told was maybe the world’s worst oil-related catastrophe in an area of the Ecuadorian Amazon — just south of the Columbia border.
So we went there and I discovered what was really an apocalyptic scene: huge, Olympic-size pools of oil that had been left in the jungle; hundreds and hundreds of these open air, toxic waste pits that Chevron had built to dispose of waste. They would put pipes into the sides of these pits so they could easily run the cancer-causing contents into nearby rivers and streams that the local indigenous peoples and other rural farming communities relied on for their drinking water and for bathing and fishing.
It was very clear that this was deliberately designed to lower production costs by polluting. So the catastrophe that we witnessed was really disturbing on a number of levels, but I think the thing that maybe most disturbed me was that it was designed to do this. It wasn’t an accident. Over time, experts began to call this the Amazon Chernobyl, and I think that by any objective metric it’s probably the worst oil-related contamination on earth. Chevron owns it. They’re refusing to take responsibility for it, and they’re refusing to pay the people they harmed compensation for the damage, even though that has been ordered by multiple courts.
So I got involved in 1993 and then became part of a team that pursued a legal case which culminated in a successful outcome for the people of Ecuador in 2011, when the Ecuadorian court ruled that Chevron was liable and owed $9.5 billion US dollars to the affected communities for cleanup. They have not paid a dollar and have since been pursuing an attack strategy against me and other lawyers, designed to help them evade complying with the law.
Rather than pay the judgment of the Ecuadorian court, which has been affirmed on appeal by multiple appellate courts, including the Supreme courts of Ecuador and Canada, Chevron has just flat out refused to comply with the law. Chevron executives have told the indigenous peoples of Ecuador that, and they’ve threatened them with what they call a lifetime of litigation unless they drop the case. They have threatened me with a demonization strategy in various lawsuits that have crippled me financially and have led to the removal of my law license without a hearing based on false evidence put forth by a paid Chevron witness.
So, ultimately, in my view, there’s a scheme led by Chevron and its law firm, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher, supported by Judge Kaplan to weaponize the law in the United States to undermine the judgment of the Ecuadorian court that held Chevron liable. And they’re doing that by trying to destroy and target me, and try to criminalize my work. They’re doing that through the US justice system in a way that I believe is an egregious violation of human rights and basic decency.
It’s very important that people understand that these attacks on me are based, almost completely, on false evidence that Chevron put forth in the US court through Alberto Guerra — who’s a man that Chevron has paid $2 million to in cash and benefits — to testify against me with no corroborating evidence that I bribed the trial judge. That didn’t happen.
Guerra later admitted to lying repeatedly in Judge Kaplan’s court. He admits he’s corrupt. He admits he’s been paid massive sums of money by Chevron in a way that violates the ethical rules of the legal profession. Yet Judge Kaplan, who’s a former tobacco industry lawyer, has credited his testimony and leveraged it against me to lock me up without a jury trial on the theory that I have violated court orders that Chevron designed to cripple my advocacy.
One of them is that I turn over my computer and cell phone to Chevron, and I’ve appealed that. And while that was on appeal, Judge Kaplan charged me with criminal contempt and had me locked up in my home where I’ve been now for over six hundred days without trial on a misdemeanor case — where the maximum sentence ever imposed is ninety days of home confinement.
LS: You’ve been under house arrest for nearly twenty months and are set to go to trial for a misdemeanor contempt charge on May 10. As I understand it, the judge in that case has just announced she’ll be shutting down Zoom access — meaning people won’t be able to see what’s taking place. Where do things stand right now?
SD: This is a trial in name only. It’s actually an exercise by Chevron and Judge Kaplan to weaponize the law and try to criminalize me without a jury and without a neutral fact finder. So this is not a real trial to us. It’s more of an attempt by Kaplan at farce. Think about it: I’m being charged by a judge, not by a prosecutor; the prosecutor’s office refused to take the case; Kaplan appointed a private Chevron law firm — Seward & Kissel — to prosecute me in the name of the people, and my judge is a major member of the Federalist Society, which is a pro-corporate group to which Chevron itself is a major donor.
So my prosecutor has financial links to Chevron, my judge has financial links to Chevron, the charging judge, Judge Kaplan has investments in Chevron, and they’re denying me jury. So my fact finder is a judge who already locked me up for almost two years on a misdemeanor without hearing any of the evidence. She has totally prejudged the case. So the technical result of the trial on May 10 is pretty much preordained. And, if this trial happens, Judge Preska will convict me and then I’ll have an appeal, but it’s not going to trial as people understand it. There’s no real fact finder.
LS: What can people concerned about your case and the extremely dangerous precedent it sets do to help you ahead of May 10 and beyond?
SD: This is how people can help: you need to bear witness. So go to our website, FreeDonziger.org and sign up. If you’re in New York or can get to New York, try to come to the trial in person. If you can’t, we’re going to continue a pressure campaign to convince the court or have the appellate court order the trial judge to open the trial up at least to audio so that people can bear witness.
There’s a huge amount of interest around the world in attending the trial but because of COVID people can’t travel, and the courthouse is really restricted right now. They won’t open more than maybe 20-25 percent of the capacity of a courtroom to have people attend. So Judge Preska, in my mind, is using COVID to limit public scrutiny of this very embarrassing situation.
LS: You also have a petition to the Department of Justice.
SD: There are several human rights groups and lawyers who are asking the US Department of Justice (that is, the Biden administration) to basically take the case out of the hands of the private Chevron law firm, because it’s illegal to be prosecuted by a private law firm that has a conflict of interest being run by the judge who charged you. It’s basically Judge Kaplan who’s my judge, jury, and prosecutor. That’s never happened before, and it’s very dangerous and violates the rule of law. No country does it that way.
People can also help by making a donation to the legal defense firm, which is being kept in trust by a law firm in Seattle. We’ve had a lot of support, a lot of small donations, so people can give a dollar, $5, $10, $50, $100, or whatever you can. Please help us because it does take resources to deal with this: a monster fossil fuel company that is attacking me and stopping at nothing to do it. They’re using sixty law firms and two thousand lawyers.
LOTS OF POSTS IGNORED BY BLOGGER..... OR REMOVED ON THEIR WHIM! ALL POSTS ARE...