Monday, June 16, 2025

The man suspected of shooting 2 Minnesota lawmakers is in custody after surrendering to the police

 

The man suspected of shooting 2 Minnesota lawmakers is in custody after surrendering to the police


VIDEO & PHOTOS ON AP


1 of 8 |  

The man suspected of killing a Minnesota lawmaker and wounding another has been taken into custody, bringing an end to a massive, nearly two-day search that put the entire state on edge. Vance Boelter was arrested Sunday evening.


Updated 6:52 AM EDT, June 16, 2025

BELLE PLAINE, Minn. (AP) — The man suspected of killing a Minnesota lawmaker and wounding another crawled to officers in surrender Sunday after they located him in the woods near his home, bringing an end to a massive, nearly two-day search that put the entire state on edge.

Vance Boelter was arrested and charged with two counts of murder and two of attempted murder. He is accused of posing as a police officer and fatally shooting former Democratic House Speaker Melissa Hortman and her husband, Mark, in their home early Saturday in the northern Minneapolis suburbs.

Authorities say he also shot Sen. John Hoffman, a Democrat, and his wife, Yvette. They were injured at their residence about 9 miles (about 15 kilometers) away.

“One man’s unthinkable actions have altered the state of Minnesota,” Democratic Gov. Tim Walz said at a news conference after Boelter’s arrest.

The search for Boelter was the “largest manhunt in the state’s history,” Brooklyn Park Police Chief Mark Bruley said. It began when Brooklyn Park officers went to check on Hortman’s home and saw her husband gunned down before the shooter fled.

The search for Boelter was the “largest manhunt in the state’s history,” Brooklyn Park Police Chief Mark Bruley said. It began when Brooklyn Park officers went to check on Hortman’s home and saw her husband gunned down before the shooter fled.

A targeted attack

Drew Evans, superintendent of the state Bureau of Criminal Apprehension, said the violence likely would’ve continued had Brooklyn Park offices not checked on Hortman’s home, causing Boelter to flee.

The Hoffmans were attacked first at their home in Champin early Saturday. A criminal complaint unsealed after Boelter’s arrest indicated their adult daughter called 911 just after 2 a.m. to say a masked person had come to the door and shot her parents.

After police in nearby Brooklyn Park learned that a lawmaker had been shot, they sent patrol officers to check on the Hortmans’ home.

Brooklyn Park police officers arrived just in time to see Boelter shoot Mark Hortman through the open door of the home, the complaint says. It says they exchanged gunfire with Boelter, who fled inside the home before escaping the scene. Melissa Hortman was found dead inside, the complaint said.

Authorities said Boelter posed as a police officer, even allegedly altering a vehicle to make it look like a police car.

No details on motive

Authorities did not give a motive as they announced Boelter’s arrest.

A list of about 70 names was found in writings recovered from the fake police vehicle that was left at the crime scene, said two law enforcement officials who spoke to The Associated Press on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to discuss details of the ongoing investigation. The writings and list of names included prominent state and federal lawmakers and community leaders, along with abortion rights advocates and information about health care facilities, according to the officials.

A Minnesota official told AP lawmakers who had been outspoken in favor of abortion rights were on the list. The official spoke on the condition of anonymity because the investigation was ongoing.

Boelter is a former political appointee who served on the same state workforce development board as Hoffman, records show, though it was not clear if or how well they knew each other.

Around 6 a.m. Saturday, Boelter texted friends to apologize for his actions, though he didn’t say what he had done.

“I’m going to be gone for a while. May be dead shortly, so I just want to let you know I love you guys both and I wish it hadn’t gone this way,” he wrote in messages viewed by AP.

The Week Ahead

 


The Week Ahead

June 15, 2025


I didn’t get a response. On Thursday, after California Senator Alex Padilla was all-but-arrested for asking a question at a cabinet secretary’s press conference and after Washington Senator Patty Murray’s moving speech on the floor of that Senate (that I reprinted for you that night), after the video emerged, after it was clear Padilla identified himself as a United States senator before law-enforcement hustled him to the ground and handcuffed him with his arms tight behind him, I reached out to my senators. I wanted to know what they thought.

We really shouldn’t have to detail the reasons senators should be appalled and outraged by this administration’s treatment of members of a coequal branch of government. But we probably have to. We have to because people like Glenn Beck called the incident “political theater” by the Democrats. On Reddit, a popular thread, although informational, recited that “Mr. Padilla was told repeatedly to back away and did not comply with officers’ repeated commands. u/SecretService thought he was an attacker and officers acted appropriately.” Of course, someone identifying himself as the United States senator for the state the secretary is in and saying he has a question for her is only a threat in a mindset where all brown-skinned people have become a threat. What happened to Senator Padilla was shocking, and the absence of outrage from Republican senators, let alone the call for Padilla to be censured, only underlines how far the country is sliding into Trumpism.

So, I reached out to my senators that night. I had press contact info for Tommy Tuberville and used that, explaining I’m a constituent and I also write this newsletter. For Katie Britt, I used the contact form for constituents, explaining that I was also looking for responses that couldn’t be printed.

I’m sure you’ll be shocked to learn I didn’t hear back and still haven’t. Maybe it’s in the works. Maybe they’re too busy to get to me just yet. And of course I’ll try again. I’ll try a couple more times.

But there’s a rule that applies to the discovery phase of a civil lawsuit—in federal cases, it’s found in Rule 37 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure—that needs to be used here as well. In civil cases, there is a robust “discovery” stage, where parties ask for and receive information from the other side. We’re familiar with this from the many cases where Trump has delayed, complained, and flat-out refused to comply during this process. Rule 37 provides that when a party fails to respond, the court can take the “designated facts … as established for purposes of the action.” I can’t think of any reason that rule doesn’t apply here as well. If a senator, or any elected representative, has the opportunity to explain their side of a matter to constituents and they fail to do so, ignoring them, then it seems like it’s fair game to assume it’s because they don’t have a good response to make, one we couldn’t rip to shreds. Because, after all, who can really defend what was done to Senator Padilla last week?

When I don’t hear from a United States senator, and specifically my United States senators, on an issue of this level of importance, I think I’m entitled to draw the inference that their answer would be a big zero. Nothing. No outrage, no willingness to stand up to Donald Trump and his administration on this incident, or frankly on any other, and call him out. Because they’re scared, because they’re toadies, because they want to keep their jobs and not have primary opposition stirred up by the leader of their party. Accountability still has to mean something in this country, and we have to hold these people accountable.

So yes, I’ll try again. I hope you’re trying too. But let’s make sure our senators know—I plan to tell mine explicitly the next time I write that I will be drawing an inference against them if I don’t get a response. Because enough is enough. And actually, they work for me. Not the other way around. They aren’t entitled to those jobs. It’s time to remind them of that fact.

Senators stand for reelection once every six years. A third of them will be up in 2026. It’s never too early to get a good candidate in the works, either a primary opponent or an opponent from the other party. Maybe they do their jobs better if they’re afraid of opposition. Right now, they’re afraid of Trump. But they don’t work for him or at his pleasure. Senate races, unlike the ones for seats in the House, aren’t vulnerable to gerrymandering because senators are elected statewide. It’s time to make sure our senators understand that, and if they lack the courage to speak up for the institution in which they serve, it’s time for their tenure there to come to an end.

California protester

In addition to keeping an eye on our employees in Washington, D.C., we have several legal matters to attend to in the week ahead. First, in California, where understanding the future of Judge Breyer’s decision requires us to do a little arcane civil procedure work. You will recall that the Trump administration immediately appealed Judge Breyer’s decision that Trump exceeded his authority when he federalized the National Guard. Normally, an appeal terminates the district judge’s jurisdiction to continue to work on the case until the appeal is over. But not here, says Judge Breyer.

His reasoning, which is quite sound, is that the Trump administration filed an emergency motion, asking the Ninth Circuit to keep Judge Breyer’s order that the Guard be restored to the Governor from becoming effective while they appealed him. There is a hearing set on that matter for Tuesday. The Trump administration has asked the Judge to wait and see what they do before moving forward in the case, a reference to his scheduled hearing on Friday to consider whether he should convert the temporary restraining order (TRO) he’s issued, which Trump is annoyed about, into a preliminary injunction that would stay in effect for the entire pendency of the case in front of Judge Breyer—in other words, keeping the guard out of Trump’s control, at least on this basis, for however long the case takes. “Delay would be counterproductive,” Judge Breyer wrote in an order on Saturday.

He pointed out that having the parties file briefs will expand the evidence available to the court and will allow them to update the facts before the court, since the situation is in flux right now. “A more fulsome record would aid both this Court in assessing the proprietary [sic] and scope of any preliminary injunctive relief, as well as the Court of Appeals, if and when it undertakes review of this Court’s findings.”

The “if and when” is included because the Trump administration has appealed the temporary restraining order to the Ninth Circuit, and TROs are not typically appealable. In normal times, one might have expected a quick dismissal of the matter noting that, but these are not normal times. Trump wants the court to treat Judge Breyer’s decision like it is already a preliminary injunction (the matter he is considering on Friday); in other words, he wants special rules to apply to him, again. The practical impact of the Ninth Circuit’s administrative stay while they consider the matter is that Trump remains in control of the National Guard troops he federalized until that court says otherwise.

If you’ve stuck with me through the legal arcana, you’ve made it through the most difficult part, but there is more:

  • This is also a week when we can expect to see multiple decisions from the Supreme Court. The Court should have been the primary focus of the week as they begin to wind down for this term, but it seems to have become almost an afterthought in the middle of everything else. We are still waiting on some highly significant cases, including the birthright citizenship case, which involves the validity of nationwide injunctions, and Skremetti, the case about medical care for transgender minors, among others. There are also cases pending on the Court’s shadow docket that will impact Trump’s ability to accumulate more power.

  • As of Sunday evening when I’m writing, there is still a manhunt on for the murderer of Minnesota lawmaker Melissa Hortman and her husband Mark. He also shot lawmaker John Hoffman and his wife, Yvette. We will undoubtedly be following that situation this week. In addition to the importance of arresting him so he is no longer a threat, it will be especially important to learn more about his motives. Is he a lone wolf or is this a movement?

We enter the week ahead with a renewed understanding of the importance of being a citizen in this country and our power. Remember when “they” said democracy wasn’t an issue and that Democrats should run on kitchen table issues? It turns out, democracy actually is an issue. And the protests yesterday proved that. Almost 2% of Americans turned out for the No Kings protests.

G Elliott Morris @gelliottmorris.com
Based on crowd-sourced records of No Kings Day event turnout, and extrapolating for the cities where we don't have data yet, it looks like roughly 4-6 million people protested Trump across the U.S. yesterday. That's nearly 2% of the U.S. pop! Mobilized anti-Trump resistance is exceeding 2017 levels
Sun, 15 Jun 2025 11:10:18 GMT
View on Bluesky

We need to keep that energy going. Don’t normalize this moment. None of it. A senator, handcuffed for asking questions. A congresswoman indicted. Marines detaining citizens on American streets. A cabinet secretary calling for the liberation of Americans from their duly elected leaders. A judge indicted in a highly speculative case that looks more like a threat than justice. Other judges condemned for making decisions in cases that are in front of them. And all of it, all of it, designed to intimidate us so we will be afraid to exercise our rights.

On Saturday, two million of us protested in the streets. We aren’t done. Yesterday was the beginning. There are elections coming, and yes, I’m going to tell you yet again that the next election will be the most important one of your life. This time, we all get that. But it is a long time before we get there, and in the meantime, we have to stay alert and focused on protecting democracy like we were yesterday. If we normalize what’s happening today, Trump will move on and do more tomorrow.

We’re in this together,

Joyce

Did you see last night’s rally?

 




Nine days.

That’s all we have left to send Andrew Cuomo back to the suburbs and elect a mayor who will finally put working people first.

And last night, 3,000 New Yorkers came together in the pouring rain to say loud and clear: This city is not for sale. Join them in the final stretch of this campaign today.

Terminal 5 was packed to capacity as Zohran took the stage with Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, state Senator John Liu, TWU President John Samuelson, Councilmember Alexa Avilés, and the Working Families Party to launch the final sprint of this campaign.

Watch the full City We Can Win rally HERE.

This wasn’t just a rally – it was a battle cry. But none of it matters if it doesn’t translate to votes.

That’s where you come in.

With 9 days left, every day counts. Every conversation is a chance to take back this city from the ultra-wealthy few who think they own it.

Let’s win this.

In solidarity,
Team Zohran

Paid for by Zohran for NYC

Why Standing Up Against Trump is Good for Business


Top News | 'He’s Not Going to Run Unopposed': Sanders Rejects Schumer for Majority Leader

                                                               LOTS OF POSTS IGNORED BY BLOGGER..... OR REMOVED ON THEIR WHIM! ALL POSTS ARE...