Showing posts with label PUTIN'S HEALTH. Show all posts
Showing posts with label PUTIN'S HEALTH. Show all posts

Wednesday, December 14, 2022

POLITICO NIGHTLY: Learning to live with a lame-duck session



View in browser
 
POLITICO Nightly logo

BY ELANA SCHOR

Presented by

Chamber of Progress

A woman holding a sign that reads

The organization MomsRising asks Congress to get to work on family-oriented benefits during the lame-duck session. | Larry French/Getty Images for MomsRising

I’LL SLEEP WHEN I’M ADJOURNED — Capitol Hill’s most memorable lame-duck sessions are always imbued with the fatalistic joy of the holiday season. The energy in the halls is part euphoria — as lawmakers and aides push toward a year-end break from the grind — and part doom, as both parties remember that legislative power has a post-election expiration date.

So, how should the current Congress make sense of its weighty lame duck agenda , which is topped by a $1.7 trillion spending deal and the issue of presidential election certification reform? A line from a noted expert in the comedy of life’s chaos comes to mind: “Enjoy every sandwich.”

It might seem paradoxical to apply the words of quirky, hard-edged rocker Warren Zevon to 435 staid practitioners of parliamentary procedure. But Zevon’s advice, delivered in an introspective turn two decades ago as he confronted a terminal lung-cancer diagnosis, is particularly relevant to politicians whose parties are preparing to cede total control over Washington.

His full quote, delivered in an interview with television host David Letterman, encouraged viewers to amplify their appreciation of all life’s moments, given the inevitability of death. And there’s something politically morbid about the time-limited nature of a lame-duck session, challenging its participants to make the most of the minutes they have left to make laws.

Indeed, lame ducks of the past are littered with examples of high-flying figures reduced to scrapping and saving face as the waning days of a Congress forced hasty decisions or bitter compromises. Days after losing to Joe Biden, Donald Trump faced another lame-duck indignity two years ago this month when Congress overrode his veto of a must-pass defense bill.

And 10 years ago this month, lawmakers experienced the epitome of a manically merry lame duck when party leaders traded profanities on the way to a multi-billion-dollar “fiscal cliff”-averting agreement. Then-House Speaker John Boehner hung on as House GOP leader for more than two years after that, but the seeds of the conservative rebellion that removed him were planted during a frantic post-election session that churned past New Year’s Eve.

It’s easy for members of Congress to miss the sandwich-enjoying opportunities of lame-duck sessions, when exhausted members and staff want nothing more than a pause in the action to be with their families. That goes double for this year’s Democratic majorities, who have gotten a surprising amount of bipartisan work done given their threadbare margins in both the House and Senate.

But there’s no time like the lame-duck present to savor the last throes of your own control over the levers of U.S. policy — after all, as Zevon might put it, divided government is just trouble waiting to happen. If Democrats want their complete power to go out with a bang, they’ll have to stick together on the last big votes of the year and try to remember that the alternative to a deal they don’t like, on government funding or any other topic, may be no deal at all. And that internecine squabbles only hurt your ability to enjoy a good sandwich.

Welcome to POLITICO Nightly. Reach out with news, tips and ideas at nightly@politico.com . Or contact tonight’s author at eschor@politico.com or on Twitter at @eschor .

 

A message from Chamber of Progress:

If passed, the Open App Markets Act S. 2710 (OAMA) would undermine content moderation on app platforms, furthering the spread of hate speech, disinformation, and violent rhetoric. Some Democrats have questioned the disastrous impact of OAMA, raising concerns about the bill creating cybersecurity risks, hamstringing content moderation, and targeting specific tech companies. So why are Democratic lawmakers still supporting MAGA Republicans in spreading harmful content online? Learn more about the dangers of OAMA here.

 
THE NEW CONGRESS

MCCARTHY’S MIGRAINE  Rep. Nancy Mace (R-S.C.) said today that she wouldn’t support removing Democrats from committees , a step GOP Leader Kevin McCarthy has vowed to take next year if he wields the speaker’s gavel, writes Jordain Carney .

The speaker — whether it is McCarthy or someone else — can unilaterally keep Reps. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.) and Eric Swalwell (D-Calif.) off the Intelligence Committee next term, a congressional aide told POLITICO, due to the specific rules governing that panel.

But the future is less certain when it comes to the other lawmakers GOP leadership has vowed to bench. That includes Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.), as Democrats make the initial call within their caucus about Omar’s committee assignments and are expected to give her a seat on the panel.

Republicans will then need to figure out how to either prevent her from getting a seat or remove her from the panel. And if it comes to a floor vote, McCarthy will need near unanimity from House Republicans given the tight margins and likely unified Democratic opposition. Removing her under that path would require a majority to support stripping her of the committee assignment — putting members on the record as part of an up-or-down vote.

Another path could be to contest a resolution that ratifies Democrats’ picks for all the committees that will come to the floor at the start of the next Congress. A member from each party offers a resolution on the House floor to ratify the picks for committee membership from their respective parties.

They are typically very low drama — the resolutions for both Republican and Democratic committee membership passed by unanimous consent in January 2021. But they could provide another leverage point for McCarthy as he seeks support to become speaker.

 

A NEW POLITICO PODCAST: POLITICO Tech is an authoritative insider briefing on the politics and policy of technology. From crypto and the metaverse to cybersecurity and AI, we explore the who, what and how of policy shaping future industries. We’re kicking off with a series exploring darknet marketplaces, the virtual platforms that enable actors from all corners of the online world to traffic illicit goods. As malware and cybercrime attacks become increasingly frequent, regulators and law enforcement agencies work different angles to shut these platforms down, but new, often more unassailable marketplaces pop up. SUBSCRIBE AND START LISTENING TODAY .

 
 
WHAT'D I MISS?

National Nuclear Security Administration Deputy Administrator for Defense Programs Dr. Marvin Adams holds up a cylinder he says is similar to one used by the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratories for a breakthrough in fusion research during a news conference today.

National Nuclear Security Administration Deputy Administrator for Defense Programs Dr. Marvin Adams holds up a cylinder he says is similar to one used by the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratories for a breakthrough in fusion research during a news conference today. | Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images

— ‘Tremendous scientific breakthrough’ in fusion energy: U.S. scientists have scored a breakthrough in fusion technology, showing for the first time that humans can wield the technology in a controlled reaction that combines atoms to create a net increase in energy, a major breakthrough that could eventually lead to a new source of clean, inexpensive power , Energy Secretary Jennifer Granholm said today. The achievement at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory came when 192 high-energy lasers converged on a diamond capsule containing a cylinder about the size of a peppercorn and filled with deuterium and tritium. The lasers entered either end of the cylinder and heated the contents to over 3 million degrees Celsius.

— Federal prosecutors charge Bankman-Fried with massive, yearslong fraud: Federal prosecutors today charged FTX founder Sam Bankman-Fried with multiple counts of fraud, money laundering and campaign finance violations , setting the stage for an explosive court battle following the collapse of the former crypto kingpin’s company. The 14-page criminal indictment and civil charges filed earlier allege that Bankman-Fried oversaw a massive corporate fraud at FTX and its affiliates that cost customers and investors billions of dollars in losses. Bankman-Fried’s attorney Mark Cohen said in a statement that the defendant is “reviewing the charges with his legal team and considering all of his legal options.”

— Advocacy groups warn of harassment on Twitter after Musk kills safety board: The morning after Elon Musk abruptly eliminated a six-year-old Twitter advisory council, children’s safety and civil rights groups warned the move will make it harder to police harassment and hate speech on the platform. GLAAD, an LGBTQ advocacy group, said that absent the council or best practices on hate speech, “the platform clearly remains unsafe not only for LGBTQ users but for brands and advertisers.” Musk has spent the weeks since he bought the platform systematically dismantling much of the company’s previous content moderation apparatus as he’s embraced demands for unfettered speech.

 GOP operative who allegedly kicked a dog hired as top aide to new congressman: A veteran Georgia Republican operative who is slated to be chief of staff for incoming Rep. Mike Collins was arrested last month for allegedly kicking a dog . Brandon Phillips was arrested on Nov. 17 on a misdemeanor charge of animal cruelty and held on a $1,200 bond, which he posted to get released, according to a booking report. In 2016, Phillips resigned as Trump’s Georgia state director after his prior criminal history was revealed.

— Democracy for America on track to shut down: Democracy for America, a liberal group founded by former presidential candidate Howard Dean, is planning to shut down unless a last-minute savior comes through, according to three people familiar with the plans. The organization notified remaining employees that their last day will be Thursday, the people said. A number of the 13 to 15 employees on the organization’s payroll in early November had already been laid off in recent works.

 

A message from Chamber of Progress:

Advertisement Image 

 
AROUND THE WORLD

CAMERA-SHY KREMLIN — Russian President Vladimir Putin won’t hold his traditional year-end press conference for the first time in at least a decade as Russian troops continue to lose ground in Ukraine, writes Wilhelmine Preussen .

The annual event has in the past run on for hours, offering Putin the opportunity to display his mastery of policy and his grip on power on live national TV. The event often had a festive atmosphere, with regional journalists holding up signs to catch Putin’s attention. Surprise questions were, however, a rarity.

Putin, who turned 70 in November, is also at the center of intense speculation over his health — and was seen swaying on camera in a public appearance earlier this week. Aides have repeatedly denied that he is unwell.

Russian troops continue to experience setbacks in Ukraine nearly 10 months after invading the country. The U.K. Ministry of Defense said today that Ukraine has liberated around 54 percent of the territory captured by Russian forces since February 24.

“As for the annual news conference, yes, there won’t be one before the New Year,” Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said on Monday. No date has yet been set for Putin’s New Year address to the nation, Peskov added.

 

JOIN THURSDAY FOR A CONVERSATION ON FAMILY CARE IN AMERICA: Family caregivers are among our most overlooked and under-supported groups in the United States. The Biden Administration’s new national strategy for supporting family caregivers outlines nearly 350 actions the federal government is committed to taking. Who will deliver this strategy? How should different stakeholders divide the work? Join POLITICO on Dec. 15 to explore how federal action can improve the lives of those giving and receiving family care across America. REGISTER HERE .

 
 
NIGHTLY NUMBER

7.1 percent

The amount consumer prices rose year over year in November, a sign that price increases are gradually cooling despite the pressures they continue to inflict on American households. That figure is down from 7.7 percent in October from last year and down from a peak of 9.1 percent in June. It was the fifth straight slowdown and beat economists’ expectations for a 7.3 percent year over year rise in prices.

RADAR SWEEP

CLANDESTINE CORNERS — Outside of London, there’s a real life school for spies, where officers of the British Secret Intelligence Service called SIS learn everything that they know. For the first time, the school is being run largely by women working in some of the most important positions in the country. And now, some of these women have agreed to speak on the record (with names changed) to journalist Helen Warrell for the Financial Times. Given that it’s only the head of MI6 who’s named and allowed to speak in public — and that all heads of MI6 have been men — it’s the first time that female spies in Britain have spoken on the record to a reporter. Read the fascinating account .

PARTING WORDS

Sen. Ted Cruz surrounded by media.

Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas), here surrounded by media, said in September, “the whole world will change depending on what Donald Trump decides.” He's now biding his time on either endorsing or jumping into the presidential race himself, and his decision on whether to run may be the best barometer for Trump’s invincibility. | Kevin Dietsch/Getty Images

THE SOUND OF SILENCE — Sometimes, the loudest noise in politics is silence.

Just under a month since Trump announced his third consecutive White House bid, some of his loudest advocates are nowhere to be found , writes Jonathan Martin .

Only one GOP senator — the former football coach last heard claiming Democrats support reparations for “people that do the crime” — is endorsing the former president, ostensible frontrunner and heretofore leader of the Republican Party. Trump defenders like Sens. Rick Scott, Josh Hawley and Lindsey Graham are silent. Sen. Ted Cruz, who in September said “the whole world will change depending on what Donald Trump decides,” is now biding his time, and his decision on whether to run may be the best barometer for Trump’s invincibility.

In the House, Kevin McCarthy, whose hopes to become speaker depend on a far-right faction of Trumpists, also won’t endorse the man he once placated at every turn. Rep. Steve Scalise, McCarthy’s deputy and the most likely fallback speaker, is similarly mute about Trump 2024.

And in the ranks of governors, the one who handed him a likeness of his image on Mount Rushmore, Gov. Kristi Noem of South Dakota, and another who was vaulted to Fox News stardom by serving in his White House, Gov.-elect Sarah Huckabee Sanders of Arkansas, are withholding their support.

Why are Trump’s loyalists staying on the sidelines while much of the Democratic Party lines up behind Biden? Some of it has to do with midterm results that bolstered Biden and hurt Trump. But there’s more than that at play. Read the entire column here .

Did someone forward this email to you?  Sign up here .

 

A message from Chamber of Progress:

Disinformation, hate speech, and violent rhetoric are threatening the stability of our democracy and the safety of many communities around the country. Even in the face of that reality, Democratic lawmakers are supporting legislation that would strip online platforms of their ability to remove harmful content—the Open App Markets Act S. 2710 (OAMA).

Some Democrats have continued to question the disastrous impact of OAMA, warning that “extremist outlets and disinformation sites could sue app platforms for blocking them,” forcing platforms to provide soapboxes to outlets like Infowars and Parler.

Democrats shouldn’t help MAGA Republicans spread harmful content online.

Learn more about lawmakers' concerns with OAMA here.

 
 

Follow us on Twitter

Charlie Mahtesian @PoliticoCharlie

Calder McHugh @calder_mchugh

Katherine Long @katherinealong

Ari Hawkins @_AriHawkins

 

FOLLOW US

Follow us on FacebookFollow us on TwitterFollow us on InstagramListen on Apple Podcast
 


 POLITICO, LLC 1000 Wilson Blvd. Arlington, VA, 22209, USA

 





Thursday, June 2, 2022

RSN: FOCUS | Exclusive: Putin Treated for Cancer in April, US Intelligence Report Says

 


 

Reader Supported News
02 June 22

Live on the homepage now!
Reader Supported News

 

Russian president Vladimir Putin was treated for cancer in April, according to U.S. intelligence. (photo: Getty)
FOCUS | Exclusive: Putin Treated for Cancer in April, US Intelligence Report Says
William M. Arkin, Newsweek
Arkin writes: "Vladimir Putin's health is a subject of intense conversation inside the Biden administration after the intelligence community produced its fourth comprehensive assessment at the end of May."

Vladimir Putin's health is a subject of intense conversation inside the Biden administration after the intelligence community produced its fourth comprehensive assessment at the end of May. The classified U.S. report says Putin seems to have re-emerged after undergoing treatment in April for advanced cancer, three U.S. intelligence leaders who have read the reports tell Newsweek.

The assessments also confirm that there was an assassination attempt on Putin's life in March, the officials say.

The high-ranking officials, who represent three separate intelligence agencies, are concerned that Putin is increasingly paranoid about his hold on power, a status that makes for a rocky and unpredictable course in Ukraine. But it is one, they say, that also makes the prospects of nuclear war less likely.

"Putin's grip is strong but no longer absolute," says one of the senior intelligence officers with direct access to the reports. "The jockeying inside the Kremlin has never been more intense during his rule, everyone sensing that the end is near."

All three officials—one from the office of the Director of National Intelligence, one a retired Air Force senior officer, and one from the Defense Intelligence Agency—caution that the Russian leader's isolation makes it more difficult for U.S. intelligence to precisely assess Putin's status and health.

"What we know is that there is an iceberg out there, albeit one covered in fog," says the DNI leader, who communicated with Newsweek via email and requested anonymity to discuss sensitive matters.

"One source of our best intelligence, which is contact with outsiders, largely dried up as a result of the Ukraine war," says the DIA senior official. "Putin has had few meetings with foreign leaders," the official says, cutting off the insights that can sometimes be gained in face-to-face encounters. "Putin's isolation has thus increased levels of speculation."

"We need to be mindful of the influence of wishful thinking," cautions the retired Air Force leader. "We learned—or didn't learn—that lesson the hard way with Osama bin Laden and Saddam Hussein."

A picture of manhood

Horseback-riding, hockey-playing Vladimir Putin has been the image of masculinity and vitality for years, a persona carefully curated by official Moscow and one often used by Kremlin propagandists to contrast the Russian leader with his American counterparts.

Then came the very long table that Putin used in the Kremlin to record the photo ops of his important meetings, one that came to symbolize his paranoia and physical fear.

The table most recently was the venue for Putin's meeting with French President Emmanuel Macron on February 7, just two weeks before the Ukraine invasion. For the intelligence community, the long table and Putin's behavior with Macron became a baseline against which to measure the Russian president's decline.

"There was no shaking of hands, no warm embrace, and we noticed that," says the DNI leader. He said that French intelligence had many observations from the meeting and the trip to Moscow, declining to elaborate on what was reported back to the U.S. government.

Then came Putin's April 21 meeting with Russian Defense Minister Sergey Shoigu, this time at a small table, the hue all green and peaceful. Many focused on Shoigu, who had been missing from the public eye. But it was Putin who had largely been absent for much of the month, and he was far from a picture of health, slouching in his chair and gripping the table with his right hand.

Some observers inferred that the Russian leader had Parkinson's disease. Others insisted it was just his KGB weapons training, referring to his rigid stance and walk, always with the right arm ready to reach inside a jacket for a gun. The video was closely scrutinized by intelligence community analysts, some trained in remote diagnosis and others in psychiatry. Many pieces of intelligence were analyzed for the White House: the consensus was that Putin was ill and probably dying. He seemed to be putting on a good show. But perhaps the isolation of COVID had masked a decline that was only now more vividly being exposed.

The May 9 "Victory Day" appearance was next, where a noticeably bloated Russian leader sat slumped. Putin's health, and his inability (or reluctance) to declare victory in Ukraine went together. The U.S. intelligence community agreed that his situation was graver than previously thought, and his physical exhaustion was matched by Russia's own exhaustion.

Three days later, Ukraine's head of intelligence Maj. Gen. Kyrylo Budanov told U.K. Sky News that Putin was in a "very bad psychological and physical condition and he is very sick," adding that there were plans inside the Kremlin to overthrow the Russian leader.

A rumor that Kremlin security people had uncovered a Russian plot to assassinate Putin was confirmed at this time. The CIA and foreign intelligence services were picking up consistent stories of discord at the top of the national security ministries, as well as the desire on the part of Russian diplomats to defect to the west.

"Someone once seen as omnipotent was now mostly seen as struggling with the future, his own in particular," says the DNI leader.

The Saddam and bin Laden effect

When serious intelligence started to circulate about Putin's illness, U.S. leaders were cautioned not to jump to conclusions too quickly, reminded of examples of hot "intelligence" about Osama bin Laden and Saddam Hussein that shaped U.S. policy and then proved questionable.

In Saddam's case, the question was whether he was psychologically disturbed and what he would do next with his weapons of mass destruction. In Osama bin Laden's case, before and after 9/11, it was whether he was dying, probably from kidney disease, and how that might influence his decisions.

Though U.S. intelligence knew little about the al Qaeda leader (and paid insufficient attention to what it did know before the World Trade Center and Pentagon attacks), the state of his health was a constant part of reporting during the late 1990's. The most persistent rumor was that bin Laden was weak and fragile, requiring regular dialysis that was unlikely to be available in a cave. Pakistani President Pervez Musharraf affirmed that bin Laden was dying; other Pakistani officials—the source of much bin Laden intelligence—agreed.

Throughout those years the Saudi government was always ready with some gossip about their native son, tidbits that were always negative, questioning his achievements and his piety. A young Bin Laden whored and partied in Beirut and on the Riviera, the rumors said. Bin Laden didn't graduate from university, dropping out. Bin Laden didn't really go to Afghanistan after the Soviets invaded. Bin Laden didn't fight once he did go. The news media picked up all of these rumors, as did U.S. leaders, failing to take into account that the Pakistanis were reporting what they thought would dissuade the U.S. from focusing too much on bin Laden, while the Saudis thought that deprecating his honor and religious devotion would dissuade more young men from following the renegade son.

Lost in the wishful thinking was the key to bin Laden's power over his fiercely loyal disciples: his grievances with the West were their grievances, too.

"What Musharraf has to say carries more weight [with U.S. policymakers] than anything the CIA might say," the senior Air Force leader tells Newsweek. "What the Saudis tell their American counterparts can be incredibly influential. Thus many wanted to believe that he was sick and couldn't believe that he was the charismatic leader that he was.

"Is Putin sick? Absolutely. But we shouldn't let waiting for his death drive proactive actions on our part. A power vacuum after Putin could be very dangerous for the world."

Saddam Hussein was considered one of the most dangerous men in the world, with CIA psychological assessments that portrayed him as a madman, a man who would never give up his WMD, a man so hated and vulnerable he had to sleep in a different bed every night. The evidence that Saddam did not have WMDs was ignored by Bush administration leaders who thought they knew better.

But the CIA wasn't solely to blame for the false belief that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction. High-level assessments offered by foreign leaders had an enormous impact.

"Hosni Mubarak [of Egypt], Abdullah [of Jordan], the Kuwaiti ruler himself—they all told Bush administration leaders that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction," says the retired Air Force leader. Where did the foreign leaders get their intelligence? From Saddam Hussein himself: it was an intentional deception on the part of the Iraqi leader to persuade the Bush administration not to invade and seek regime change, an implicit threat that he would use WMD if they did.

In some cases, experts now agree, some of that intelligence from foreign leaders, shared face-to-face with Bush counterparts, didn't circulate widely in the Agency. There was a clash between technical analysis that often doubted the existence of WMDs versus the Bush leadership's conviction that the U.S. intelligence community was a victim of group-think and that Saddam's public denials about WMDs were lies. (In fact it was his confidential whispers that were the lies.) That cognitive gap helped lead to war.

An expiration date?

The U.S. intelligence community's latest assessment for President Biden and other senior leaders saw a turnaround for the Russian leader after the previous report, compiled about two weeks earlier, portrayed him as gravely ill. On one day—May 26—he made his first public visit to a Moscow military hospital. He had a phone call with Italian Prime Minister Mario Draghi. And he spoke to a Russian business conference via video. Each appearance was closely scrutinized. This Monday, Putin had a phone call with Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan where the two discussed the possibility of a face-to-face meeting with Ukrainian President Zelensky.

Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov dismissed any notion of Putin being sick in an interview on French TV last weekend. "I don't think that a sane person can suspect any signs of an illness or ailment in this man," Lavrov said, citing Putin's recent public appearances.

"Lavrov's insistence that everything is normal is as much a declaration of allegiance to Putin as it is any kind of diagnosis to be listened to," says the DIA official. The official says that Putin continues to be "challenged" both health-wise and in his leadership.

Are the lessons of bin Laden and Saddam being applied to Vladimir Putin? Is he fighting off Kremlin opponents and warring with his own intelligence agencies? Is he indeed dying? What—or who—comes next? These are the issues that the Biden administration is grappling with even as they publicly insist that rumors of Putin dying are just rumors.

"Even if they agree that the intelligence [that Putin is dying] is reliable," the senior DNI leader says, "they can't bank on an expiration date nor signal their support for a Russia without Putin." Both President Biden and Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin have let slip their desire not only for regime change but also the fall of Russia, and both have since walked back their indelicate statements.

"A nuclear-armed Russia is still a nuclear-armed Russia, whether Putin is strong or weak, in or out, and not wanting to provoke him or his potential successor into thinking we are hell bent on their destruction is an important part of continued strategic stability," says the DNI official.

The DIA leader argues that in some ways, "Putin being sick or dying is good for the world, not just because of the future of Russia or ending the Ukraine war, but in diminishing the mad man threat of nuclear war.

"A weakened Putin—an obviously declining leader, not one at the top of his game—has less influence over his advisors and subordinates, say, if he orders the use of nukes."

As the official explains it, a strong Putin could bully his way through, overcoming objections from ministers and commanders. But a damaged Putin (and here the official mentions Donald Trump as a similar example), "one who might not be in control of all of his faculties, just doesn't have that kind of sway."

"Putin is definitely sick ... whether he's going to die soon is mere speculation," the DIA official says. "Still, we shouldn't rest assured. We shouldn't answer our own mail, if you will, believing only the intelligence that affirms our own desired outcome. He's still dangerous, and chaos does lie ahead if he does die. We need to focus on that. Be ready."



READ MORE

Special Coverage: Ukraine, A Historic Resistance
READ MORE

 

Contribute to RSN

Follow us on facebook and twitter!

Update My Monthly Donation

PO Box 2043 / Citrus Heights, CA 95611





Save 50% on TNR | How Did Trump Do on His Labor Day Report Card?

                                                                                                 LOTS OF POSTS IGNORED BY BLOGGER..... OR RE...