“We Got Him”: Inside the Fast Arrest of Alleged Kirk Killer Tyler Robinson—and the Spin That FollowedA gripping, fact‑driven narrative of the alleged Charlie Kirk shooter: the family tip, the evidence trail, the profile—and why rushing to blame “the radical left” outruns facts.September 12, 2025 Content note: violence, legal process, political rhetoric. The suspect is presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty.
The ArrestThe governor stepped to a podium and said the line every shaken community waits to hear: “We got him.” Less than two days after a single shot killed Charlie Kirk during a daytime campus event, a 22‑year‑old named Tyler Robinson was in custody. At a press conference this morning, Utah’s Governor Cox said, “We got him.”:  That couldn’t be farther from the truth. Tyler Robinson’s dad, a youth pastor, turned him into the FBI.
It began when a parent recognized a face and a gait in the still frames released by investigators—grainy rooftop images of a figure in motion, leaping down and vanishing. Instead of stonewalling, the family picked up the phone. They reached out not to a political operative but to someone they knew personally: a youth pastor who also serves on a U.S. Marshals task force. Within hours, that network routed the information to the right hands. A young man was quietly detained. The scramble and fear gave way—for the first time in a day and a half—to a breath. No victory laps. No televised perp walk. Just a family who did the right thing, and a governor’s grandstanding, and a brief sentence: “We got him.” 2) Reconstructing the Evidence Trail(What each piece can—and can’t—prove right now.) Rooftop video. The clip that galvanized the search shows a figure moving along a roofline, then jumping down and fleeing. It places a person at the scene, moving away from the firing position, close in time to the shot. It does not, on its own, prove identity; that requires corroboration—comparative clothing, gait analysis, or device data that ties a specific individual to those exact steps.  Prints and impressions. Investigators described shoe impressions and palm/forearm prints along the route to and from the rooftop. If matched to Robinson, prints do two things: they locate him on a path to the firing position and they timeline his presence. They don’t, by themselves, establish motive. And like all forensics, they’ll be tested by defense experts.
Discord messages. A roommate presented messages that referenced acquiring and ditching a rifle, an outfit change, and even engraving bullets. If authenticated (device in hand, chain of custody intact), these logs can be powerful. But screenshots aren’t evidence until they’re forensically tied to the suspect and to a verified account. The content, tone, and timing will all matter. The rifle. Search teams recovered an older bolt‑action rifle—described as a Mauser‑pattern .30‑06—wrapped in a towel in a wooded area off campus. The chamber reportedly held a spent casing. If ballistics match the projectile that killed Kirk, and if unique tool marks tie the casing to that rifle, prosecutors gain a critical link: means. Defense will scrutinize where it was found, who had access, and whether any DNA or prints connect Robinson to the weapon. Engraved casings and bullets. Investigators said they found a fired casing and several unfired rounds marked with phrases—some political, some meme‑y, one a crude anti‑gay taunt. That matters for state of mind, but it does not prove a clean ideological motive. People engrave everything from song lyrics to inside jokes. Until prosecutors pair these artifacts with long‑form writings, search histories, or posts, interpretation is speculative. The path from stills to a name. Put together, the video, prints, messages, and rifle don’t yet tell a complete story—but they narrow the field. Add the family tip and the pastor‑to‑Marshals connection, and you get a credible route from pixels to a person in cuffs. 3) Who Is Tyler Robinson?
Age & status. 22 years old. Not a Utah Valley University student. He reportedly attended Utah State University for one semester in 2021 and did not return. There’s no public record of military service or formal firearms training. Ideology: Information about Tyler being terminally online has revealed that he is a Nick Fuentes/Groyper, yet to be confirmed, but Groypers are an army created by Nick Fuentes, and Fuentes has encouraged violence against Trump acolytes over the Epstein Files. Groypers are violent white nationalists who categorically hate Trump, Shapiro, and Kirk, et al.
Where arrested. Southern Utah, in the St. George/Washington County area, far from the campus where the shooting occurred. Voter registration. Public voter files list Robinson as unaffiliated/non‑partisan. That is a data point—not a worldview. Registration does not equal motive. Family dynamics. What we can say without doxxing: a parent recognized the imagery investigators released and contacted a trusted faith‑community leader who also happens to work with federal law enforcement. That call became the hinge in the case. Family members also told investigators that Robinson had grown “more political” recently and had spoken disparagingly about Kirk before the event.
What’s not known. There is no public confirmation of a manifesto, a diary, a screed, or membership in a named group. There’s no official word on substance use, past arrests, or mental‑health history. If any of that exists, it will surface—first in probable‑cause affidavits, later in discovery. Presumption of innocence. Robinson is alleged to be the shooter. He is in custody. Charges are pending. He is presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty. 4) The Narrative Vacuum—and How It Got FilledWhile investigators stuck to facts, the nation’s microphone snapped to the loudest voice. The president blamed “radical left lunatics” and said “we just have to beat the hell out of them.” He also called for nonviolence in other remarks, but the vivid line is the one that stuck. It’s what lines like that do: they burn into the timeline. Here’s the problem. At the time of arrest, authorities had not announced a motive. The ballistics weren’t public. The Discord logs awaited full authentication. The engravings on the shells were suggestive but ambiguous. The voter file said “unaffiliated.” And the family—not a leftist cell or a right‑wing militia—was the key actor that brought a suspect in. That doesn’t mean the shooter wasn’t ideologically motivated. It means we don’t know yet. And when we pretend we know—when leaders hurl an entire bloc of Americans into the suspect box—we prime the next act of retaliation. We grow the very climate we claim to fear. 5) What the Evidence Can—and Can’t—Tell Us Right Now
Investigations translate maybes into evidence. They also surface the messy middle—the parts that don’t fit anyone’s script. 6) Standards That Keep Us SaferDue process isn’t a courtesy; it’s a safety measure. It slows the stampede. It forces facts to carry more weight than slogans. It protects the innocent and strengthens the prosecution of the guilty. The opposite of Trump’s rhetoric. Accurate attribution is a civic duty. If the motive is ideological, say it—with proof. If it isn’t, say that too. But resist the reflex to slap a brand on a tragedy before the lab work is dry and the phone records are read. Refuse violence—including in rhetoric. When leaders promise to “beat the hell” out of entire categories of people, they don’t deter violence; they license it. They also hand extremists on all sides exactly what they crave: the feeling of righteous permission. 7) The Work AheadIn the coming days, expect the probable‑cause affidavit to sketch a motive theory. Expect a charging decision—possibly with capital‑eligible counts. Expect device forensics to clarify whether the Discord chatter lines up with a longer diary of intent. Expect defense counsel to challenge every link in the chain. Our job is simple, if not easy: Stay with the facts as they harden. Correct what we get wrong. Condemn violence without turning millions of neighbors into suspects. Hold leaders—including presidents—to a standard of language that cools the country down. Because the only thing worse than a murder on a college campus is what comes next if we let anger become policy and rumor and a desire for more blood to become proof. |
Friday, September 12, 2025
“We Got Him”: Inside the Fast Arrest of Alleged Kirk Killer Tyler Robinson—and the Spin That Followed
Monday, January 16, 2023
FOCUS: Tim Dickinson | 'Stop the Steal' Founder Tipped Off Paul Gosar to Brewing Violence on Jan. 6
15 January 23
Live on the homepage now!
Reader Supported News
In a text message to the right-winger's top aide, Ali Alexander warned: “I think you and your staff should leave”
Ali Alexander is a far-right agitator who was one of the key mobilizers of the protest that morphed into the insurgency of Jan. 6, 2021. After making an early exit from the Ellipse rally he’d helped organize — at which Donald Trump demanded his backers march on the Capitol — Alexander became an eyewitness to the chaos unfolding as insurrectionists breached the Capitol perimeter.
“People were scaling the wall like Spiderman,” Alexander testified to the Jan. 6 committee. “I’ve never seen anything like that.”
But Alexander didn’t just stop and gawk. He took time to sound the alarm to Gosar, one of his top House allies. “I think you and your staff should maybe leave,” Alexander texted Gosar’s chief of staff, Thomas Van Flein. “This is hell out here.”
This partisan early warning is cited in the Jan. 6 committee’s 236-page deposition of Alexander, and has not previously been reported. That message, and other details from Alexander’s and related depositions, offer new clarity into the Stop the Steal movement’s links to both far-right paramilitary groups and far-right MAGA lawmakers, including Gosar, Lauren Boebert, and Marjorie Taylor Greene.
The committee questioners pressed Alexander about his relationship to the Arizona congressman/dentist. “Dr. Paul Gosar and I share political beliefs about election irregularities,” Alexander responded, citing the baseless conspiracy theory that the 2020 election was stolen from Donald Trump. Alexander then added that Gosar is “a friend to the movement” and “a stellar dude.”
A questioner for the committee sought to clarify Alexander’s warning text: “So you thought Mr. Gosar and Mr. Gosar’s staff was in danger?” Alexander responded: “I thought that they could potentially be in danger … if this escalated.” He added, “I knew a lot of people in Congress. I wouldn’t want them hurt. So I said ‘I think you and your staff should maybe leave.’ Now in retrospect,” Alexander conceded, “that’s stupid because where were they going to go?” There was, of course, no safe exit from the Capitol on Jan. 6. — as it was soon overwhelmed on all sides by the dead-end Trump supporters Alexander had summoned to the Capitol.
The timestamp of the text Alexander sent is 1:10 p.m., according to additional evidence released by the committee. The warning was delivered just two minutes before Gosar rose on the floor of the House to object to the certification of the Electoral College votes from his home state of Arizona. “I rise up for myself and 60 of my colleagues to object,” Gosar said with an American flag Covid mask pulled down under his chin, “to the counting of the electoral ballots from Arizona.”
Ali Alexander is a protégé of Roger Stone, the Trump-pardoned felon who has been a dirty trickster in American politics for decades. Stone coined the phrase “Stop the Steal” in 2016, but Alexander testified that the two have a “gentleman’s agreement” for him to use it politically. Alexander is a top ally of the conspiracy theorist Alex Jones, as well, whom he accompanied during the chaos of Jan. 6.
Alexander, who bears a passing resemblance to Sammy Davis Jr.. is also known to Trump, who always greets him, Alexander testified, by pretending to mistake him for the member of the Rat Pack: “Whenever we see each other, he makes the comment to say, ‘Sammy?’”
In the aftermath of the 2020 election, Alexander organized a roving series of Stop the Steal rallies that brought together far-right extremists, toughs, and militants — including the Oath Keepers, Proud Boys, and “Groypers” (or followers of the white-supremacist Nick Fuentes). Oath Keepers former general counsel Kellye SoRelle testified to the Jan. 6 committee that Alexander, Jones, and Stone were “the center point for everything” having to do with the Stop the Steal movement.
In addition to his connections with extremist groups, Alexander also had forged connections with far-right members on Capitol Hill. Alexander’s relationship with Gosar appears the most extensive. Alexander testified that in the runup to Jan. 6, Gosar would share messages from Trump with him. “Representative Gosar, if he would talk to the President or meet with the President, might relay some good news back to me,” Alexander told the committee.
When specific plans for Jan. 6 were in development, Alexander testified, he initially sought to hold a morning rally in the shadow of the Capitol — at which Gosar was confirmed to be a speaker.
But planning for the events surrounding Jan. 6 fluctuated as the date neared. The original time slot for Alexander’s Capitol event was pushed back to the afternoon, when Congress would be in session, making Gosar’s participation impossible. Alexander, in turn, got roped into planning for the primary event at the Ellipse, where Trump would address the day’s rabid throng.
Alexander’s participation in that Ellipse rally was not fully welcome. Kylie Kremer, a lead organizer of the Ellipse rally, told the Jan. 6 committee that “Ali is a shady character.” But she said she chose to keep him in the loop because he was “the devil that you know,” and she “would rather keep him close” than risk having him turn on her.
Caroline Wren was another key organizer and fundraiser for the Jan. 6 rally. Alexander testified that Wren was “my main point of contact with what I’m calling Trump world.” Wren testified that Alexander’s participation was needed because he was a better organizer than Kremer and her mother, Amy, who ran the group Women For America First.
“His website, at the end, had 50,000-plus RSVPs,” Wren testified to the committee. “The Kremers had somewhere around 20,000, and that was after the President of the United States had tweeted it multiple times, the Kremers had promoted it. They had less than half the number of RSVPs that Ali Alexander did.”
As part of his planning for the Ellipse event, according to text messages cited by the Jan 6. committee, Alexander hosted a Jan. 3 conference call about logistics for the event. On the call and afterward, Alexander touted that it was joined by several, high-profile right-wing members of Congress.
Wren, who had to drop off the call early, texted Alexander soon after with the query: “Who are the Members of Congress that were on…?” Alexander responded: “Gosar, Lance Goodman, Lauren B, Marjorie, and maybe Congressman Kelley at a minimum were on.” In his testimony Alexander said he could not recall the specifics of the call but that “Lauren B” referred to Lauren Boebert and “Marjorie” meant Marjorie Taylor Greene, of whom Alexander said, “she’s awesome.”
If Alexander anticipated a peaceful day on Jan. 6, it’s hard to square with his rhetoric leading up to the event. At a rally in D.C. on Jan. 5 he led a crowd in a chant of “Victory or death!” And in the predawn hours of Jan. 6 he tweeted that it was the “first official day of the rebellion.”
Alexander was originally slated to be a speaker at the Ellipse rally, but was ultimately boxed out from a turn at the mic. He was, instead, given VIP access for the president’s speech, which Alexander attended along with Alex Jones.
Alexander testified that he did not stay for the duration of Trump’s speech. Instead, he and Jones were tapped (by either Wren or her aide, he said) to lead protesters from the overflow area listening to Trump’s speech in a march toward the Capitol.
Alexander recalled that he traveled with Jones, accompanied by Jones’ security detail, and that they walked toward the Capitol after Jones first made an impromptu speech. Alexander insisted that he and Jones had the intention of reaching the staging area on the north side of the Capitol where Alexander’s separate Stop the Steal event was permitted to begin that afternoon.
But the agitator told the committee that as chaos began to unfold, he quickly realized that his event wasn’t going to happen. He claimed that he tried to “deescalate” the crowd, but the committee questioner was incredulous. “Can you help me understand that assertion with the fact that you were walking to the Capitol, chanting things such as ‘Stop the Steal’?” (Alexander claimed that by chanting he was “gathering people to us … so that we can then move people where they belong.”)
Alexander wasn’t the only one offering text-message warnings to flee the scene that day. As the violence began to unfold, Wren texted Alexander, warning him that this outcome spelled trouble for him. “I think you should leave,” Wren wrote in a text cited by the committee. “This will come down on you hard.”
Alexander has not been charged for any crime in relation to Jan. 6, nor was he referred for prosecution by the Jan. 6 committee. He did reveal that he’s communicated with the FBI through an attorney. In an opening statement, Alexander told the committee: “I had nothing to do with any violence or law breaking that happened on January 6th. I had nothing to do with the planning of violence. I had nothing to do with the preparation of violence. I had nothing to do with the execution of violence. Any suggestion to the contrary is factually false.”
Neither Alexander, Thomas Van Flein (on behalf of Gosar), nor Wren replied to requests for comment for this story.
Alexander is in the news this week because Elon Musk overturned the permanent Twitter ban he received in the immediate aftermath of Jan. 6. Alexander has shown no signs of being chastened by his close encounter with the insurrection, or of reforming his inflammatory rhetoric. In fact, his reinstatement to Twitter came just hours after he’d cheered on the insurrection by far right Brazialians who stormed key government buildings in Brasilia on Sunday.
For his part, Alexander made clear to the Jan. 6 committee that one social media platform was more important than all others as a tool he’d used to whip up the crowds who stormed the Capitol. “Which social media platforms did you use to promote the events on Jan. 6?” a committee questioner asked. Alexander responded: “Primarily Twitter.”
Indeed, Twitter was not just the platform Stop the Steal used to publicize its rallies. It also used the platform’s group chat funcion to organize and communicate internally, and with key allies, including at least one member of Congress.
According to two committee depositions, as the situation calmed after 5 p.m. on the day of Jan. 6, Rep. Gosar sent a Twitter DM message to a Stop the Steal Twitter group chat of which he was a member. “We’re still on lockdown in the congressional office,” he wrote.
Follow us on facebook and twitter!
PO Box 2043 / Citrus Heights, CA 95611
Top News | 'He’s Not Going to Run Unopposed': Sanders Rejects Schumer for Majority Leader
LOTS OF POSTS IGNORED BY BLOGGER..... OR REMOVED ON THEIR WHIM! ALL POSTS ARE...
-
LOTS OF POSTS IGNORED BY BLOGGER..... OR REMOVED ON THEIR WHIM! ALL PO...
-
LOTS OF POSTS IGNORED BY BLOGGER..... OR REMOVED ON THEIR WHIM! ...
-
LOTS OF POSTS IGNORED BY BLOGGER..... OR REMOVED ON THEIR WHIM! A...
