Showing posts with label VICE PRESIDENT. Show all posts
Showing posts with label VICE PRESIDENT. Show all posts

Saturday, October 3, 2020

POLITICO NIGHTLY: What we still don't know



 
POLITICO Nightly: Coronavirus Special Edition

BY RYAN HEATH AND RENUKA RAYASAM

With help from Myah Ward

UNANSWERED QUESTIONS — Covid infiltrated one of the world’s most secure bubbles this week. President’s Donald Trump’s positive diagnosis wasn’t the first infection in the White House, a workplace that’s been notoriously lax about Covid protocols. But his admission to Walter Reed shows just how sneaky a threat the virus can be.

Almost 20 hours after the most notable tweet of Trump’s presidency, we still have a lot of questions. Among them:

Who infected Trump? There’s no evidence that Hope Hicks infected the president. Based on the timing of his symptoms, Howard Forman, who directs the health care management program at the Yale School of Public Health, said: “It does seem more than likely that the Supreme Court nomination event on Saturday was at least part of a super-spreading event. But it wasn’t the event itself until you can start there and try to work backwards from that.” It’s possible the exposure could have happened earlier this week, when the president campaigned in Pennsylvania, or even before then.

How severe are his symptoms? Trump disclosed his condition early this morning. The CDC does not define mild symptoms, but the World Health Organization classifies the most serious symptoms as “difficulty breathing or shortness of breath, chest pain or pressure, loss of speech or movement.”

What were the White House safety protocols and were they violated? Trump has been known to denigrate masks and those who wear them. What’s not clear is who has been within six feet of the president for more than brief interactions. Trump and Joe Biden were eight feet apart during the debate — more than the usual required six feet — but the length of time they were together and arguing could affect transmission.

How many more people close to Trump will test positive? Forman is critical of the White House procedures so far. “This is not a complicated contact trace,” given official event logs, Forman said, adding, “This is what goes on in South Korea every day.” Time matters: At Saturday’s Supreme Court nomination event, “a good number of people were older in age, and it really could have significant health consequences and safety effects to identify those people sooner than later.”

Campaign officials and Trump aides who were contacted by the White House Medical Unit as part of contact tracing measures were asked to report for testing early this afternoon, but others at risk of exposure were left to procure coronavirus tests on their own.

Will the Bidens get sick? The Bidens tested negative today but that’s not the end of the story: “As we now well know, #COVID19 tests can be negative today, positive tomorrow,” tweeted Eric Feigl-Ding, epidemiologist and health economist at Federation of American Scientists. “I want to see at least 3, preferably 5 negative tests over the next week to be honestly sure.”

How many Republican senators will get the virus? And what will it mean for Amy Coney Barrett’s Supreme Court nomination? Utah’s Sen. Mike Lee has already tested positive. Mitch McConnell has promised it’s “full steam ahead” with the nomination process, but he may not control that.

How does this change next week’s vice presidential debate, assuming it happens? Trump’s diagnosis and Biden’s age underscore the importance of the No. 2 in the line of succession. If Trump were to get sicker and invoke the 25th Amendment, Kamala Harris could end up debating Acting President Mike Pence.

The Biden campaign has raised a health and safety objection with the Commission on Presidential Debates: It wants 12 feet space between Harris and the vice president. The Pence team wants seven feet.

Welcome to POLITICO Nightly: Coronavirus Special Edition. Reach out rrayasam@politico.com or on Twitter at @renurayasam.

White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows exits the West Wing on his way to speak to reporters about President Trump's positive coronavirus test outside the West Wing of the White House on Oct. 2, 2020 in Washington, DC.

White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows exits the West Wing today on his way to speak to reporters about Trump's positive coronavirus test. | Drew Angerer/Getty Images

PALACE INTRIGUE

A SICK PENCE WOULD BE REALLY COMPLICATED — A Covid-19 outbreak inside the White House brings into sharp relief the literal nightmare scenarios that constitutional and presidential scholars have warned about for decades. What happens if Trump is sick or incapacitated and unable to fulfill the duties of the presidency? And what happens if both Trump and Pence get sick? Who takes over then?

There are two major problems with U.S. executive succession rules that inject enormous uncertainty: First, while the 25th Amendment neatly covers what happens if the president resigns, dies or falls sick in office, it says nothing about a sick or incapacitated vice president — a problem that led Dick Cheney to write a secret resignation letter and have his White House lawyer hide it away in case his heart problems ever left him unable to function as vice president, Garrett M. Graff writes in POLITICO Magazine.

Second — and more problematic for a scenario where Nancy Pelosi is second in line to the presidency — the presidential succession plan laid out by Congress is legally murky and might actually be unconstitutional. Today, it remains an open debate whether the House speaker is actually eligible to succeed to the presidency.

All this is to say that, while the news that Trump has tested positive and is showing symptoms of Covid-19 is worrisome, true fear about the future of the Republic shouldn’t settle in until either the vice president falls ill or the vice president takes over. Both these scenarios could lead to potential power struggles and fraught questions about who military and government officials should be listening to.

 

GET THE SCOOP FROM THE MILKEN INSTITUTE GLOBAL CONFERENCE: POLITICO's Ryan Heath and Ben White are teaming up to write a special "Global Translations" newsletter and bring you exclusive coverage and the top takeaways from the 23rd annual Milken Institute Global Conference, featuring 4,000+ participants and 500 speakers representing more than 70 countries. Don't miss out on insights from the most influential minds and thought leaders reinventing health, technology, philanthropy, industry, and media. This year's conference will center on the theme "Meeting the Moment," and will address the dual crises of a global pandemic and social injustice. Sign up today for everything you need to know direct from #MIGlobal.

 
 

WILL THE DISEASE CHANGE TRUMP? Trump’s Covid diagnosis is the most serious known health threat to any sitting president in decades. In the latest edition of 2020 Check-In, Video reporter Eugene Daniels talks to Ryan Lizza about the implications of the president’s Covid case.

Courtesy of POLITICO.

‘WEAKNESS WAS THE GREATEST SIN OF ALL’ — The wee-hours shockwave of his diagnosis has exposed the fragility of Trump’s bravado, senior staff writer Michael Kruse writes. The man who’s trumpeted his genes and his blood and his virility while deriding his foes for low energy is now stricken and sequestered, cut off from the adoring supporters who stoke not just his political prospects but his needy psyche. He is 74 and obese, and already was facing a pending public reckoning — and the fear of being seen as anything other than strong in the end is precisely what has made him so weak.

ON THE ECONOMY

WALL STREET SHRUGS — Trump’s Covid-19 diagnosis rocked the political world but ultimately caused only a ripple on Wall Street. Stocks opened sharply lower but mostly bounced back after Biden said he’d tested negative.

The market moves suggest that one of Trump’s signature rally riffs — that a Biden win would crush the market and evaporate 401(k) accounts — is a fantasy, chief economic correspondent Ben White emails us. Markets also performed just fine after online betting markets and snap polls suggested Biden won the first debate. It’s hard to find a single serious Wall Street trader or executive who thinks markets couldn’t handle a Biden victory. A long, bitter fight over the results is a much bigger concern.

The relatively muted reaction to news that the president of the United States is suffering from a potentially deadly virus also came on renewed hopes that Washington might finally produce a deal on new fiscal stimulus for a flagging economic recovery that clearly needs it. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi called on airlines to stop their recent wave of layoffs because economic aid from Congress would come in one form or another, either in a large deal or a stand-alone bill.

The repeated collapse of stimulus talks pressed markets lower in the last couple weeks, alongside evidence that the recovery is in danger of tanking. Most of the nearly $4 trillion already spent in fiscal stimulus trickled out of the system at the end of the summer. Today’s jobs report showing a gain of only 661,000 (ordinarily a great number but not after we lost 22 million in two months) highlighted the need for another cash injection from Washington.

Wall Street tends to worry about chaotic situations like this depressing consumer confidence and driving down spending. But increased consumer uncertainty is no certainty. Morning Consult’s index of consumer sentiment in the U.K. and Brazil showed little deterioration after each of those country’s leaders tested positive for Covid-19. And analysts noted today that Trump’s diagnosis could (possibly) lead to increased mask-wearing and social distancing among Covid skeptics, possibly limiting spikes in new cases.

 

NEW EPISODES: LISTEN TO POLITICO'S GLOBAL TRANSLATIONS PODCAST: The world has always been beset by big problems that defy political boundaries, but in 2020 many of those issues have exploded. Are world leaders and political actors up to the task of solving them? Is the private sector? Our Global Translations podcast, presented by Citi, unpacks the roadblocks to smart policy decisions, and examines the long-term costs of the short-term thinking that drives many political and business decisions. Subscribe now for Season Two, launching Oct. 21.

 
 
AROUND THE NATION

LEFT BEHIND — New Jersey authorities, already facing alarming spikes in coronavirus cases after a months-long lull, are now dealing with a possible super-spreader event — and Trump may be the source, Matt Friedman reports.

“He looked 100 percent normal,” John Sette, the former Republican chair of Morris County, said of Trump’s appearance at a high-dollar fundraiser at his golf club in Bedminster, N.J., on Thursday that was attended by about 100 people after Hope Hicks tested positive. “He spoke 100 percent normal. He spoke for about 15 minutes and he took questions for an hour.” Other media accounts have cited anonymous attendees who said the president appeared “lethargic” and “not himself” during the event.

New Jersey Gov. Phil Murphy, a Democrat, said “the contact-tracing process is underway.”

“We urge everyone who was in and around the Bedminster event or events yesterday to take full precautions, including self-quarantining and ultimately getting tested,” Murphy said at a press briefing today.

ASK THE AUDIENCE

Nightly asked you: Have you adopted a new pet during the pandemic? Below are some of the photos you sent us.

Nightly collage of pets readers got during the coronavirus pandemic

THE GLOBAL FIGHT

BAD HEALTH HASN’T BEEN GOOD POLITICS — If you’re a national leader contracting Covid-19, don’t bet on a political boost. Seven leaders have acknowledged positive tests, and only the U.K.’s Boris Johnson got a temporary approval boost.

Johnson was diagnosed in March when less was known about the coronavirus and before his government was definitively panned for its ham-fisted pandemic response. Johnson himself was expecting a child with new wife Carrie Symonds, and was hospitalized — including in intensive care — for a week, all of which helped attract sympathy and support.

While Johnson achieved a 19 percent approval boost from mid-March to mid-April as the pandemic intensified, according to Morning Consult’s tracker poll, most of that boost (14 points) came before his March 27 diagnosis. Johnson would go on to hit 65 percent approval by mid-April, but the 5 point boost he achieved while hospitalized disappeared by April 24, less than two weeks after he was discharged from hospital. Johnson’s approval then steadily dropped to 38 percent by the end of September.

Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro received multiple positive coronavirus tests in July, with virtually no effect on his support levels. Both his approval and disapproval ratings remained static in the 45 to 48 percent range throughout his convalescence.

In Europe’s last dictatorship, Belarus, opinion polls don’t mean much. But since President Alexander Lukashenko contracted coronavirus in July — in the lead up to a widely discredited presidential election — his regime only faced increasing political condemnation. A months-long protest movement — the biggest in Belarus’ post-Soviet era — is calling for fresh elections and had prompted U.S. and EU sanctions. Lukashenko dismissed mask-wearing, and claimed vodka drinking and sauna use could stave off the virus.

Guatemalan President Alejandro Giammattei achieved skyrocketing approval ratings of 87 percent in April — a 31 percent jump from February — after introducing strict Covid-19 control measures. Those numbers didn’t leave much room for improvement when he was diagnosed with Covid-19 two weeks ago. Giammattei lives with multiple sclerosis.

Leaders from Honduras, Bolivia, and Prince Albert of Monaco have also contracted the virus. The first ladies of Honduras and Spain have also tested positive.

NIGHTLY INTERVIEW

SEE YOU NEXT TIME — Given today’s news, we’re postponing Part 2 of executive health editor Joanne Kenen’s interview with Howard Frumkin, a leading expert on environmental health and the former dean of the University of Washington School of Public Health, until Monday.

PUNCHLINES

THAT’S A WRAP — Brooke Minters takes us through the week that was in political cartooning and satire in the latest Punchlines, featuring the first presidential debate and the ultimate October surprise: Trump’s Covid diagnosis.

Courtesy of POLITICO.

NIGHTLY NUMBER

11

The number of Covid-19 cases reported in Cleveland stemming from the presidential debate on Tuesday, according to the city government.

PARTING WORDS

WHAT A YEAR — People who find something amusing in news that the President of the United States has coronavirus — or that any citizen of any land has contracted the potentially deadly virus — must in their own way be pretty sick, writes founding editor John F. Harris. And yet:

Does it not seem a little like the cosmos is toying with the U.S. of A, like a cat’s paw swatting a frightened mouse? At a minimum, a tragic year is taking on slapstick dimensions. The natural human reaction to slapstick is to laugh.

So, is it OK to laugh at Trump’s news? My recommendation: Nope, not OK.

Once done with the wisecracks and punch-drunk delirium of this year of warped national destiny, decent-minded people should hope he gets better soon — and that a troubled country does so, too.

Did someone forward this email to you? Sign up here.

 

Follow us on Twitter

Renuka Rayasam @renurayasam

 

FOLLOW US





 

 POLITICO, LLC 1000 Wilson Blvd. Arlington, VA, 22209, USA






Monday, August 3, 2020

RSN: Karen Bernal and Christian Shaughnessy | The Case for Who Should Not Be Vice President: Joe Biden, Are You Listening?






Reader Supported News
02 August 20
It's Live on the HomePage Now:
Reader Supported News


RSN: Karen Bernal and Christian Shaughnessy | The Case for Who Should Not Be Vice President: Joe Biden, Are You Listening?
Bernie Sanders, left, and Joe Biden chat before a Democratic presidential debate in Charleston, S.C. (photo: AP)
Karen Bernal and Christian Shaughnessy, Reader Supported News
Excerpt: "On July 20, the California Bernie delegates to this year’s Democratic National Convention issued a press release along with an open letter to presumptive Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden, calling on him to choose from a short list of three vice-presidential candidates they had arrived at through a democratic vote: Representative Barbara Lee (D-Calif.), former State Senator Nina Turner (D-Ohio), and Representative Karen Bass (D-Calif.)."
 News of the letter was greeted with national interest; several publications quoted from its contents and mentioned that over 90 percent of those voting (most of the delegation) strongly agreed on the three women. Mainstream media were quick to point out that California senator Kamala Harris was not among those preferred by progressives – a stinging point noticed by many.
Since then, the profile of Congresswoman Bass has been elevated and promoted in the national press. But whether Biden should decide to go with Bass, Harris, or any other on his reported short list, the conversation on the vice-presidential pick is incomplete without the flip-side of what have so far been positive appeals for a strong progressive. Indeed, in a time of COVID, Black Lives Matter protests, and police-state repression, the records of both Senator Harris and Representative Val Demings (another on Biden’s short list) warrant greater scrutiny.
There can be no denying that in the era of Black Lives Matter, public awareness regarding the conduct of law enforcement is such that the spoken truth of our nation’s criminal justice system being fundamentally biased against people of color and the poor is without question. And yet, the records of both Harris and Demings indicate their careers were built and advanced on upholding wrongful convictions, backing police accused of excessive force, and a general “get tough on crime” approach that disproportionally targeted people of color, immigrants, and the poor – who had no power, financially or politically, to alter their conditions.
This included Cheree Peoples, a mother who was arrested under Harris’s signature truancy program, a project that targeted parents. Cheree’s daughter Kayla missed school often because of chronic and painful sickle cell anemia, a condition known to her school’s administrators. Unsurprisingly, Black and Latino parents were disproportionately singled out for punitive actions. This also includes Kevin Cooper, who came within four hours of being executed in 2004 and who, according to five judges at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit, is likely innocent. As attorney general from 2011 to 2017, and with evidence in her custody that could have been tested to prove his innocence, Harris opposed DNA testing. It was not until a much-read New York Times article on the case went viral that she reversed her position.
As San Francisco’s district attorney, Harris supported a 2008 San Francisco policy that forced police to notify ICE when undocumented children committed felonies. Despite San Francisco officially being a sanctuary city, police leveled felony charges against a 13-year-old Australian boy of color who took 46 cents from a classmate he was in a fight with. The boy was detained by ICE for a few days as they prepared to deport him and his family. Good legal work and media glare ultimately prevented the deportation, but over 100 other youths fell victim to the policy she supported; many were handed over before innocence or guilt could be established.
And then there is Harris’s open and sustained defiance – to the point of nearly causing a constitutional crisis – of the U.S. Supreme Court’s 2011 ruling that required the state to reduce the overcrowding of its prison system, which, according to a just-published American Prospect article, “was stuffed to some 200 percent of its designed capacity.” The article goes on to highlight the case of Daniel Larsen, wrongfully convicted and serving 27-years-to-life under California’s “three strikes” law. Harris argued that “even if Danny was innocent, his conviction should not be reversed, because he waited too long to file his petition.” Thankfully, the U.S. Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals denied Harris’s appeal.
While the scrutiny of upholding wrongful convictions resides with Harris, criticism over a lack of accountability for cases involving police brutality follows Florida representative Val Demings. A recent Politico article found that “Demings routinely sided with police over community complainants and operated cautiously within the system, despite longstanding complaints that the department was prone to excessive force.” Even as juries decided against the Orlando Police Department in several high-profile cases, Demings’s view that police actions were within the scope of allowable practices has remained unchanged. Her op-ed in the Washington Post written four days after the death of George Floyd, in which she asked former fellow officers, “What in the hell are you doing?” seemed to indicate that finally, a line had been crossed. Still, coming just over two years after she co-sponsored the 2018 Protect and Serve Act (which would have made assaulting a police officer a federal hate crime) – a bill that was opposed by the NAACP, ACLU, and other groups – the conversion hardly inspires faith that her newfound “wokeness” is genuine.
All of which goes to the heart of the reason so many progressives oppose both Harris and Demings as contenders for vice president: in neither candidate is a compelling case with a sense of authenticity being made for why they are the right choice for the job at this historically significant moment. Progressives are looking for the kind of exceptional leadership that can help usher in the transformational changes so urgently needed. And as progressive delegates to the convention, we are calling for a VP candidate with a history of demonstrated fortitude in the face of entrenched power, not someone skilled at just-found-religion rhetoric.
The records of the congresswomen here are otherwise: Harris succumbed to the worst sort of transactional politics when she chose not to prosecute Senate campaign donor Steven Mnuchin for foreclosure violations. Demings lacked the courage to defy the Orlando Police Union and stand up for 84-year-old Daniel Daley. At a time of increased awakening to the problems in law enforcement and politics, they both chose the side of corrupt power over those who were its victims.
Donald Trump will not be defeated without the votes of the progressive base, which now skews toward younger people of color, for whom issues of social injustice are paramount. Without their votes, Democrats will lose. California progressive delegates chose their own short list to send to Joe Biden. Did he hear them? We cannot be sure. But again, we make the case for who should – and should not – be vice president. And as with other prominent demands, come the beginning of August we will find out if the Democratic Party remains a party of outdated conventional wisdom or has become a party that listens to a future calling for it to be better.

Karen Bernal is a former chair of the California Democratic Party’s Progressive Caucus and was co-chair of California’s Bernie Sanders delegation to the 2016 DNC Convention in Philadelphia. She is also a Sanders delegate to the 2020 DNC after working for the campaign as Northern California Regional Field Director. She lives in Sacramento.
Christian T. Shaughnessy is a multiracial activist from San Bernardino, California. He is a member of MEChA and the Inland Empire Democratic Socialists of America. He was an organizer in Iowa and Nevada for the 2020 Bernie Sanders campaign and is now an at-large Bernie Sanders delegate from the state of California.
Reader Supported News is the Publication of Origin for this work. Permission to republish is freely granted with credit and a link back to Reader Supported News.














Tuesday, July 28, 2020

POLITICO NIGHTLY: How the pandemic changed the veepstakes








POLITICO Nightly: Coronavirus Special Edition
Presented by
BIDEN’S COVID CALCULUS — There’s been a lot of attention on how the coronavirus pandemic has altered the 2020 presidential campaign. The conventions will be mostly virtual. The debates will be different, too. The first debate was moved today, from Notre Dame to Cleveland’s Case Western Reserve University, and the hosts announced that the event may not include an audience.
But the ongoing Covid crisis has also changed the calculus for Joe Biden’s next decision: his running mate.
In conversations about the process with plugged-in Democrats, four big issues came up for how the virus changed the veepstakes.
First, the pandemic could make it easier for Biden to choose someone who doesn’t have traditional campaign experience. Susan Rice, Barack Obama’s ambassador to the United Nations and then national security adviser, has emerged as a serious possibility. She has never run for office before, and some Democrats argue that a more seasoned political communicator is necessary.
But that major drawback might be less detrimental this year, some Democrats argue, when a virtual campaign will demand political skills that are more like a film actor’s than a stage actor’s.
As one former government official who worked with Rice in the Obama administration said, “She has no campaign experience but there’s no campaign!”
Second, the virus has raised the profile of a number of Democratic governors. Being a governor was once seen as the best stepping stone to the presidency, but they haven’t been faring as well since George W. Bush left the Oval Office. The pandemic has offered Biden a chance to observe a real-time test of the leadership skills of several governors, including Gretchen Whitmer of Michigan, Gina Raimondo of Rhode Island, and Michelle Luján Grisham of New Mexico.
All three women have been praised for their response. One adviser to the Biden campaign who has been consulted about several potential candidates told me, “Gretchen Whitmer may be more of a possibility than people think.”
The risk, several Democrats noted, is that these governors are still battling the virus. “They have all been pressure-tested in real time,” said a Democratic strategist who was previously involved in the vice presidential selection process. “But is it an advantage or disadvantage to be a governor? What if something goes wrong in the next few months?”
Third, it’s harder for Biden to get to know the contenders. As Biden whittles down his list and conducts one-on-one interviews, the pandemic means he will have to decide whether he can afford the health risk of conducting the sessions in person or if they will have to be conducted via video. This is no small concern for someone like Biden, who doesn’t have deep relationships with most of the candidates, and who prizes personal relationships that are forged in one-on-one settings. “He’s a guy for whom his instincts and chemistry will matter more than most,” said the Democratic strategist. But it’s hard to bond over Zoom.
Finally, and perhaps most important, Biden knows that if he’s elected president the pandemic will consume his transition and first months in office. This means that he’ll want someone that he knows is prepared to meet that specific challenge with him. He is said to want someone who is loyal and willing to own politically fraught decisions, not someone preparing her presidential campaign.
The Biden adviser noted that when it comes to confronting the pandemic, as well as the multiple other crises that will be swirling around a Biden presidency, trust will be the key issue: “When the tough decisions are made, would she be too preoccupied with 2024?”
Welcome to POLITICO Nightly: Coronavirus Special Edition. Renu is on the move, but her inbox is still right here. She’ll be back Wednesday. Reach out rrayasam@politico.com or on Twitter at @renurayasam.
A message from AARP:
More than 59,000 residents and staff of nursing homes and long-term care facilities have died from COVID-19. With cases continuing to spike across the country, desperate families are demanding Congress take immediate action. More lives can be saved if Congress makes sure necessary precautions are put in place. Take action

FIRST IN NIGHTLY
OBJECTION — Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell warns that businesses need protection against “an epidemic of lawsuits” that will arise as workers and customers sue employers over exposure to Covid-19. Yet data suggests that coronavirus-related litigation isn't very contagious, Eleanor Mueller writes.
Of the 3,727 coronavirus-related cases that have been filed since March, just 185, or less than 5 percent, fall into the personal injury category that McConnell describes — plaintiffs claiming fear of exposure, potential exposure or exposure to Covid-19, according to an analysis by the American Association for Justice of a litigation tracker run by law firm Hunton Andrews Kurth. Instead, the bulk of the legal actions deal with insurance claims and civil rights, including people challenging stay-at-home orders.
The association represents plaintiffs' lawyers; Hunton Andrews Kurth represents more than one-third of Fortune 100 companies, according to its website. That rate of filings is relatively low, labor law experts and advocates say, considering that more than 4 million cases of coronavirus have been reported in the U.S., and some 145,000 people have died.

HAPPENING 7/29 @ 12 p.m. EDT – A DEEP DIVE INTO 2020 CAMPAIGN POLLING : With less than 100 days remaining until Election Day, it’s time for a deep dive into campaign polling with POLITICO senior campaign and elections editor Steven Shepard and national political reporter Laura Barrón-López. Hear from expert pollsters Margie Omero and Jon McHenry on how the polls look today and what they portend for the future, how the industry corrected mistakes made in 2016, and the impact of Covid-19 on their work. REGISTER HERE.


ON THE HILL
THE COUNTEROFFER — While the first three major coronavirus relief packages passed Congress with large bipartisan majorities — despite some intense partisan wrangling — this round of discussions is going to be much more challenging, Marianne LeVine, John Bresnahan and Sarah Ferris write. Democrats want to spend at least $2 trillion more than Republicans will propose, while GOP hardliners don't want to do a package at all.
Senate Republicans began to release their coronavirus relief proposal this afternoon. McConnell outlined the pillars of the proposal, which would include another round of $1,200 in direct payments, more money for the Paycheck Protection Program, a reduction in boosted federal unemployment benefits, liability protection and more than $100 billion for reopening schools and colleges.
The Senate GOP proposal calls for the reduction in increased federal unemployment benefits from $600 to $200 per week for a 60-day period, or until states are able to provide a 70 percent wage replacement, according to sources on a call with GOP staff Monday. This prospective change had been floated by the White House last week, although there have been concerns whether state unemployment agencies could handle the revisions.
A federal $600 boost in unemployment benefits from the March CARES package began to expire over the weekend. Democrats are pushing to extend those benefits into next year.
PALACE INTRIGUE
O’BRIEN TESTS POSITIVE — President Donald Trump socially distanced himself from his own national security adviser today after he tested positive for Covid-19, Daniel Lippman writes.
"I haven't seen him lately," the president said of Robert O’Brien during a brief exchange with reporters on the South Lawn of the White House. "I heard he tested, yeah. I have not seen him."
The president's remarks come days after a Thursday phone call between Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin — the kind of high-level meeting that would typically demand the national security adviser's close involvement. The White House released a spartan readout of the call that did not list the participants, and administration officials declined to answer questions about whether O'Brien was in the Oval Office at the time.
According to a White House statement, O’Brien “has mild symptoms and has been self-isolating and working from a secure location off site. There is no risk of exposure to the president or the vice president. The work of the National Security Council continues uninterrupted.”

Advertisement Image 

FROM THE HEALTH DESK
RAYS OF LIGHT — “Deep cleaning” is, as Derek Thompson wrote in the Atlantic today, a bit of “hygiene theater” that’s not all that effective in preventing the spread of Covid-19. But there’s a different technology, Nightly’s Myah Ward writes, that some scientists think has real promise to kill the coronavirus: ultraviolet light.
Not just any ultraviolet light: It needs to be UVC, also known as germicidal UVC, which contains shorter wavelengths of radiant energy that can destroy a pathogen’s ability to multiply and cause disease. While ultraviolet rays from the sun can cause skin cancer, UVC is only mildly irritating to the skin and eyes, said Salmaan Keshavjee, a professor of global health and social medicine at Harvard Medical School.
The technology has been used in hospitals and prisons for decades to ward off the spread of viruses, Keshavjee said. After the drug-resistant tuberculosis 1980s outbreak in the U.S., UVC lighting was installed in homeless shelters and emergency rooms in cities like New York City, Miami and Boston. Very few countries use this technology widely, though there was an uptick in interest with the H1N1, SARS and Mers outbreaks, he said.
The idea is to put the device high up in a room where it’s not in the direct sight of people, Keshavjee said. Ceiling fans and air currents circulate the contaminated air to the top and the light kills pathogens before the air cycles back down. “These are like $100 fixtures,” Keshavjee said. “This isn’t a million-dollar intervention. They run on 110 volts of electricity, the same as the regular fixture up there.”
There’s a lot of misinformation about germicidal UV, said Edward Nardell, a professor at Harvard Medical School. People often assume all UV light is dangerous. But now there’s a wavelength of ultraviolet light that should eliminate those concerns, he said.
Far-UVC — an even shorter wavelength than UVC — was effective in killing more than 99.9 percent of seasonal coronaviruses present in airborne droplets, according to a study published in June by Columbia researchers.
Because far-UVC’s smaller wavelength won’t penetrate a person’s skin or eyes, it can be used in occupied rooms to disinfect the air and surfaces, said David Brenner, director of the center for radiological research at Columbia University’s Irving Medical Center.
The researchers are studying the effect of far-UVC on SARS-CoV-2, and preliminary data suggests it’s just as effective in killing the pathogens.
The technology isn’t a cure for the spread of Covid-19, Brenner said. “We don’t see it as replacing the weapons that we have: masks and social distancing,” he said. “But we do see it as another weapon in the battle.”
IN MEMORIAM
LEWIS HONORED IN ROTUNDA — Rep. John Lewis arrived at the Capitol a final time this afternoon, where he will lie in state for two days, one of the last stops for the civil rights icon who long ago transcended politics to become an American hero. Lewis, who died July 17 at age 80 after being diagnosed with cancer, will lie in state in the Georgia Capitol on Wednesday before being buried in a private funeral in Atlanta Thursday.
Lewis, the son of tenant farmers from rural Alabama who was nearly beaten to death by state troopers while marching for voting rights across the Edmund Pettus Bridge in 1965, went on to serve more than three decades in Congress and never tired of engaging in the “good trouble” he so often urged Americans to find. Lewis is only the second Black lawmaker to lie in state at the Capitol, following the late Rep. Elijah Cummings of Maryland, who was honored in Statuary Hall last year.
Nightly video player of Rep. John Lewis lying in state in the U.S. Capitol
ASK THE AUDIENCE
Nightly asks you: Have you taken up a new hobby or activity because of the pandemic? Send a picture capturing it to nightly@politico.com and we'll include some of our favorites in our Friday edition.

EVERYTHING HAS CHANGED: Policy professionals' work has drastically changed since the outbreak of Covid-19. Read what 700+ policy professionals had to say about this “new normal” in POLITICO Pro’s 2020 Policy Insider’s Report: Policymaking during a Pandemic .


NIGHTLY NUMBER
14
The number of Miami Marlins baseball players and staff members who have tested positive for Covid-19. Two major league games scheduled for tonight were postponed after the positive tests in an outbreak that stranded the team in Philadelphia.
THE GLOBAL FIGHT
NINE LIVES — A pet cat in England has tested positive for Covid-19, the first confirmed case in an animal in the U.K. and one of very few worldwide. The U.K.'s Chief Veterinary Officer Christine Middlemiss said that it was “a very rare event” and there was no evidence to suggest that pets transmit the coronavirus to humans. The cat is thought to have contracted the virus from its owners, who had tested positive and since made a full recovery — as has the cat, chief U.K. correspondent Charlie Cooper writes.
British authorities referred the case to the World Organisation for Animal Health, which is monitoring incidents of the coronavirus in animals. Public Health England's Medical Director Yvonne Doyle said the case should “not be a cause for alarm.”
“The investigation into this case suggests that the infection was spread from humans to animal, and not the other way round,” she said.
There was no evidence that the cat had passed on the virus to other animals, the U.K.’s Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs said.
Visitors watch a sea lion performance at Central Park Zoo as New York City zoos reopen during Phase 4 of re-opening.
Visitors watch a sea lion performance at Central Park Zoo as New York City zoos reopen during Phase 4 of reopening. | Getty Images
PARTING WORDS
HIDING IN PLAIN SIGHT — The face mask, something that seemed entirely foreign to most of us until a few months ago, has become an unavoidable part of our daily lives; so much so that our social media feeds are filling with “maskies,” those same sultry sun-lounger selfies as every summer, this time with face-coverings.
Hannah Roberts admits she wasn’t an early adopter: When she saw air travelers in masks in early January, she assumed they were overreacting. When wearing a mask became compulsory in shops in Italy in April, she huffed and whined.
But these days, Hannah is a convert and an evangelist — not just because she could potentially prevent someone from getting sick and dying of COVID-19, but because it voids the need for numerous social niceties.
Social distancing has already killed the kiss on each cheek and the handshake. The logical next casualty, thanks to the mask, is the fake smile. Throw on some sunglasses with your face mask, and you can legitimately pretend not to recognize acquaintances you’d rather avoid.
Hannah writes: “As we inch back to office life, the mask has given us license to drop courtesy greetings and chit-chat with coworkers too. My natural resting face is moody-to-serial killer, but it no longer matters. I’m spared from water-cooler chat and small talk, as no one can really understand each other — or bear the discomfort of trying to chat through a mask for very long. Behind the façade, I freely frown, scowl or chuckle to myself, without fear of appearing impolite.”
A message from AARP:
SENIORS DEMAND ACTION

It is an outrage that more than 59,000 residents and staff of nursing homes and other long-term care facilities have died from COVID-19. Cases are continuing to spike across the country and Congress must act now to help save lives in these facilities.

Protect nursing home residents with AARP’s five-point plan calling for:
1. Regular, ongoing testing and adequate personal protective equipment (PPE)
2. Transparency focused on daily, public reporting of cases and deaths in facilities; communication with families about discharges and transfers; and, funding accountability.
3. Access to facilitated virtual visitation.
4. Better care for residents through adequate staffing, oversight, and access to in-person formal advocates (called long-term care ombudsmen)
5. No blanket immunity to long-term care facilities related to COVID-19.

Tell Congress to act now to protect the residents and staff of nursing homes and other long-term care facilities. Take action

Did someone forward this email to you? Sign up here.

Follow us on Twitter
Renuka Rayasam @renurayasam

FOLLOW US
 POLITICO, LLC 1000 Wilson Blvd. Arlington, VA, 22209, USA











I just drove a tractor-sized hole in MAGA's Senate majority hopes

                                          LOTS OF POSTS IGNORED BY BLOGGER..... OR REMOVED ON THEIR WHIM! ALL POSTS ARE AVAILABLE ON MIDDLEB...