Showing posts with label TED YOHO. Show all posts
Showing posts with label TED YOHO. Show all posts

Sunday, July 26, 2020

RSN: FOCUS | AOC Represents the Future of America: Women Who Refuse to Be Silenced









Reader Supported News
25 July 20

If we are to have any chance of finishing the July funding-drive we need to press now and pick up the pace.
For the entire month we have fewer than 400 donations. That’s horrible.
I know we can do better than that.
Can you help?
Marc Ash
Founder, Reader Supported News


If you would prefer to send a check:
Reader Supported News
PO Box 2043
Citrus Hts, CA 95611



Reader Supported News
25 July 20
It's Live on the HomePage Now:
Reader Supported News


FOCUS | AOC Represents the Future of America: Women Who Refuse to Be Silenced
Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez. (photo: Brittainy Newman/NYT)
Area Mahdawi, Guardian UK
Mahdawi writes: "Hello? Police? I’d like to report a murder. On Thursday Republican congressman Ted Yoho was elegantly eviscerated by Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez on the House floor."

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez elegantly eviscerated Republican congressman Ted Yoho on the House floor this week

itches get things done
Hello? Police? I’d like to report a murder. On Thursday Republican congressman Ted Yoho was elegantly eviscerated by Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez on the House floor. In just under 10 minutes, the New York congresswoman made Yoho look like the yahoo he is, and delivered a searing indictment of structural sexism. Do watch the full speech if you haven’t already – it’s a masterclass in responding to misogyny.
Some quick context: on Monday Yoho confronted AOC on the steps of the US Capitol, calling the congresswoman “disgusting” for talking about how poverty can drive crime. As the pair parted, Yoho called Ocasio-Cortez a “fucking bitch”.
While Yoho’s insults were overheard by a reporter, he insists he never made them. On Wednesday, Yoho told the House that he apologized for the abruptness of the conversation he’d had with his “colleague from New York” (he didn’t even give Ocasio-Cortez the courtesy of addressing her by name) but that the words attributed to him had been misconstrued. Yoho also noted that he has been “married for 45 years” and has two daughters so was “cognizant” of his language. As we all know, it is impossible for married men with daughters to be sexist. Just look at Harvey Weinstein and Brett Kavanaugh. Just look at Donald Trump!
Some media reports characterized Yoho’s sneering speech as an “apology”. It very clearly wasn’t: it was an assertion of power that followed a familiar pattern. First came the gaslighting, the insistence his behaviour had been “misconstrued.” Then came the self-righteous justification. “I cannot apologize for my passion,” he declared with a smirk on his face. The subtext to his little speech: What are you going to do?
As Ocasio-Cortez noted on Thursday, at first she wasn’t going to do anything. After wryly tweeting “b*tches get stuff done” on Tuesday, she was ready to be done with the situation. You get used to dehumanizing behaviour when you’re a woman, you get desensitized to it. You don’t report abuse or harassment because nobody is going to take you seriously. You ignore the guy shouting obscenities at you on the street because you’re afraid for your personal safety. You ignore sexist comments from a colleague because you’re worried about your professional security. This is one of the most insidious things about patriarchy – it takes the fight out of you. You let things go.
But, after Yoho’s non-apology, Ocasio-Cortez decided not to let this go. As she explained in her speech, she’s encountered language like Yoho’s a million times before. “[T]his is not new, and that is the problem. This issue is not about one incident. It is cultural. It is a culture … accepting of violence and violent language against women, and an entire structure of power that supports that.” She went on to criticize Yoho for using his daughters as a shield; “I am someone’s daughter too.”
It wasn’t just the content of Ocasio-Cortez’s speech that was powerful, it was the way she delivered it. There was a carefully controlled fury in her voice that every woman will be familiar with. “I cannot apologize for my passion,” Yoho declared; as a man he doesn’t have to. When Brett Kavanaugh threw a temper tantrum in front of the Senate judiciary committee, Donald Trump Jr praised his “tone.” Men like Kavanaugh and Yoho are not penalized for their “passion”; they’re not penalized for showing their emotion. Women are. Show too much emotion and you’re “hysterical”, you’re “crazy”, you’re a “nasty woman”. And so you learn to control your fury, to modulate your emotion. You learn to apologize for your passion.
But no matter how measured you are, no matter how reasonable, it’s never enough. A New York Times article about Ocasio-Cortez’s speech cynically noted the congresswoman “excels at using her detractors to amplify her own political brand”. Instead of analyzing the cultural norms that allow men like Yoho to belittle women with impunity, it cast Ocasio-Cortez as a disruptive opportunist. A woman standing up for her dignity is reduced to “brand-building”. The article is a perfect example of what Ocasio-Cortez was referring to when she talked about Yoho’s actions being supported by an “entire structure of power”.
That structure of power, it’s important to note, encompasses race and gender. The only thing that irritates men like Yoho more than an outspoken woman is an outspoken woman who also has the temerity not to be white. “I cannot apologize for my passion or for loving my God, my family and my country,” Yoho told the House. The subtext of that, of course, is that women like Ocasio-Cortez do not belong in “his” country. As Ocasio-Cortez pointed out in her speech, it’s a sentiment she hears a lot: “The president of the United States last year told me to go home to another country, with the implication that I don’t even belong in America.”
Guess what? Ocasio-Cortez isn’t going anywhere. She represents the future of America: women who refuse to be silenced, refuse to “know their place”, and refuse to apologize for their passion.









Friday, July 24, 2020

Systemic sexism




Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez for Congress


On Monday, Rep. Yoho called Alexandria a “f**cking b*tch” on the steps of the Capitol. Then, on the House floor, he invoked the names of his wife and daughter to offer a non-apology – refusing to acknowledge his complicity in a system that has allowed sexist rhetoric to remain an everyday occurrence for women in the 21st century.
We’re not looking for an apology from Rep. Yoho. Alexandria doesn’t want one, he doesn’t want to give one, and it’s clear that in his heart, he’s not sorry for what he did. But here’s what we won’t accept: Yesterday, media outlets referred to Rep. Yoho’s non-apology as legitimate remorse. We won’t let that record stand.
Women and girls across the country should not be told what Rep. Yoho offered is a legitimate apology. They should not be given the message that in the halls of power, dutifully elected women can be victims of verbal abuse, and the harm levied towards them can be waived off as “passion, loving my God, my family or my country.” That’s called an excuse.
Things must change. That’s why our movement is fighting so hard to uplift progressive, working-class voices – particularly the voices of women – so we can correct the systemically broken nature of our halls of power. Will you chip in to help us build this progressive movement?
This harm that Rep. Yoho tried to levy on Alexandria is about more than one incident. When men in power brazenly display sexist behavior and disrespect, they embolden other men to act in the same disgusting ways. Rep. Yoho’s defense applies to anyone who would call even his own daughters misogynist and dehumanizing slurs.
Across the United States, sexism is far too common in the workplace. Places of power like Congress aren’t immune to that reality, and the fact that change has not yet happened is no accident. It’s emblematic of overwhelmingly white, disproportionately male spaces that protect misogynistic, exclusionary behavior.
It’s not a coincidence that leaders like Alexandria, Rashida Tlaib, Ayanna Pressley, Ilhan Omar, Maxine Waters, Barbara Lee, and so many others face disproportionate backlash when they stand up for their principles. Deep down, many old-school figures lash out at them because they can’t verbalize what they feel inside: “People like that shouldn’t be here.”
This is why we need voices like AOC’s in Congress – to take on, call out, and ultimately dismantle the power structures that benefit and protect the privileged. We need representatives who will reshape the halls of power in our image. That’s what our movement is working hard to do every day, and why we need you to stand with us now.
Together, we can correct the systematic injustice that emboldens people like Rep. Yoho, and replace people like him with leaders who truly represent the people of this country.
In solidarity,
Team AOC
Contribute $15





 
Donate
Like on FacebookFollow on TwitterFollow on Instagram
Paid for by Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez for Congress
 To contribute via check, please address to Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez for Congress, PO Box 680080, Corona, NY 11368.
Email us: us@ocasiocortez.com





Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez






Ayanna Pressley


On Monday evening, Rep. Ted Yoho accosted Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez on the steps of the Capitol. He called her “disgusting” and a "b*tch" simply because she had the audacity to talk about the unprecedented challenges facing so many of our communities.
Unfortunately — this is not one moment. What brings us to this place are the structural and cultural conditions and, yes, the very men who have normalized the marginalization of women and specifically women of color since this nation's very inception.
Rep. Yoho’s actions are yet another reminder that the patriarchy is a tool of oppression. And U.S. Congresswomen, too, are subject to the harassment and marginalization that countless women across this country face when they dare speak truth to power.
These tactics are all too familiar and yet, still, we rise. Our foremothers — trailblazing women elected to Congress before us — equipped us to take on a world built on contradictions and injustice. Because of them, we have learned how to walk with our heads held high.
And now, it is incumbent upon us to organize, advocate, and legislate for justice, so that we create space for the next generation.
Will you split a $5 contribution with Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez right now so we can both keep fighting for justice and equity?
Contribute $5
I first stepped foot in the halls of Congress at the age of 19. My mother poured into me a sense of reverence for this institution. I walked through hallways — and I still do today — flanked by statues of men who enslaved my ancestors, in a building built by my enslaved ancestors.
While there might still be specters in these hallways set on upholding oppression and misogyny, I know that when my daughter Cora walks through these hallways today that she sees my name embossed on a plaque outside our office and lit up on the voting board above the House floor. And she sees the names Tlaib, Omar, Chu, Jayapal, Escobar, Trahan, Underwood and more.
Our very existence in Congress is proof that progress has been made, but there is still much to be achieved — we are not yet who we can be.
I speak to our daughters: you are powerful. You are limitless. Your contributions to this world are brilliant, needed, and uniquely yours. Your ideas are substantive, your lived experiences, your kind heart, and your critical eye belong at every single table where decisions are being made.
We affirm these truths to be self-evident, that women are the backbone of every family, of our communities, and we are nation builders. To Cora and all our daughters: we believe in you fully, without reservation, you have a right to show up in the world exactly as you are, and who you are is always enough.
Alexandria, myself, and our colleagues — we’re committed to building that world for all of our daughters. Join us by splitting a $5 contribution between Alexandria and our movement now.
Contribute $5
Thank you for your support.
In solidarity,
Ayanna Pressley





 
Donate
Paid for by the Committee to Elect Ayanna Pressley
To contribute via check, please address to Committee to Elect Ayanna Pressley, PO Box 240912, 554 Washington Street, Dorchester Center, MA 02124.
Email us: info@ayannapressley.com








Thursday, July 23, 2020

RSN: Bob Fitrakis and Harvey Wasserman | Bribed Ohio's $60 Million Radioactive Uproar Rocks the 2020 Vote




Reader Supported News
23 July 20

At this point no one is donating at all. This won’t work, period. We need serious attention to the funding drive now please.
In earnest.
Marc Ash
Founder, Reader Supported News


If you would prefer to send a check:
Reader Supported News
PO Box 2043
Citrus Hts
CA 95611




Reader Supported News
23 July 20
It's Live on the HomePage Now:
Reader Supported News


RSN: Bob Fitrakis and Harvey Wasserman | Bribed Ohio's $60 Million Radioactive Uproar Rocks the 2020 Vote
The FBI has charged Republican speaker of the Ohio house of representatives Larry Householder with taking  million in bribes. (photo: Columbus Dispatch)
Bob Fitrakis and Harvey Wasserman, Reader Supported News
Excerpt: "Ohio's biggest-ever bribery case is rocking America's reactor industry ... and the fall election."
Full details of the shocking arrest of Ohio’s powerful Speaker of the House are still unfolding.
But on Monday, the FBI charged Larry Householder and four associates with taking $60 million (that’s NOT a typo) in bribes from “Company A,” suspected to be the Akron-based nuke utility FirstEnergy. The company has not been formally named as the source of the bribe, but FE’s stock has since plummetted.
Householder is suspected of buying votes for the widely hated $1.5 billion bailout of two decrepit nuke reactors on Lake Erie. Donald Trump lobbied at least five legislators to support the cash giveaway. Ohio’s moderate Republican governor, Mike DeWine, has asked Householder to resign. 
Without the bailout, Perry and Davis-Besse would already be dead in the rising tsunami of US reactor shutdowns. 
The handout also supported two ancient coal burners (one in Indiana), and ten small solar plants. It killed a big, highly successful state-wide efficiency program and crippled further Ohio development of wind and solar. 
Facing the imminent shutdown of FE’s dying Perry and Davis-Besse nukes, Householder rammed the bailout through a gerrymandered Ohio legislature with just a few votes to spare. In recent primaries, the company assaulted a score of free-market Republicans and hesitant Democrats, replacing them with compliant corporatists. The HB6 bailout could not have passed without those hand-picked Republicans and a few Democrats now suspected of pocketing some of Householder’s FE cash. 
The indictments have Ohio burning. 



Mayor Ted Wheeler reacting to tear gas at a protest in Portland, Ore., early Thursday. (photo: Mike Baker/The New York Times)
Mayor Ted Wheeler reacting to tear gas at a protest in Portland, Ore., early Thursday. (photo: Mike Baker/The New York Times)


Portland Mayor Tear-Gassed by Federal Officers, Warns 'Somebody's Going to Die' During Chaotic Protests
Trevor Hughes, USA Today
Hughes writes: "Mayor Ted Wheeler was tear-gassed by federal officers along with a large crowd of protesters late Wednesday night after he tried for hours to calm down angry activists demanding police reform from City Hall and calling for federal authorities to withdraw from this mostly liberal, mostly white city."



Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez. (photo: Alex Brandon/AP)
Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez. (photo: Alex Brandon/AP)


Republican Congressman Ted Yoho Issues Non-Apology to AOC After Allegedly Calling Her a 'f*cking B*tch'
Griffin Connolly, The Independent
Connolly writes: "Congressman Ted Yoho issued a partial apology for 'the abrupt manner of the conversation' he had with Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez on the Capitol steps on Tuesday, where a reporter allegedly heard him call her a 'f***ing bitch.'"

Ms Ocasio-Cortez says the statement was 'not an apology' and that he 'didn't even say my name'
Mr Yoho did not apologise for that particular comment, however, claiming he did not say it to Ms Ocasio-Cortez during their brief confrontation, which he initiated.
"The offensive name-calling — words attributed to me by the press — were never spoken to my colleague, and if they were construed that way I apologise for their misunderstanding," he said in a speech on the House floor on Wednesday.
"It is true that we disagree on policies and visions for America, but that does not mean we should be disrespectful. Having been married for 45 years with two daughters, I'm very cognizant of the language I use," Mr Yoho said.
Ms Ocasio-Cortez wrote on Twitter that Mr Yoho's statement was "not an apology," and that "he didn’t even say my name."
"I will not teach my nieces and young people watching that this an apology, and what they should learn to accept. Yoho is refusing responsibility," she said. 
Mr Yoho, one of two veterinarians in Congress, is retiring at the end of this term, his fourth representing North Central Florida's 3rd District.
While he is a member of the conservative House Freedom Caucus, Mr Yoho has had a mostly quiet career in Congress, working behind the scenes on animal-rights initiatives and on bills related to his work in the Agriculture and Foreign Affairs Committees.
That made his sudden brush with Ms Ocasio-Cortez even more perplexing.
Ms Ocasio-Cortez recently claimed that a rise in gun violence in New York, which includes a spike in the number of people critically injured and killed, was the result of dire economic conditions that have left people the option to either "shoplift some bread or go hungry that night."
Mr Yoho said she was "disgusting" for making the claim, and told her, "You are out of your freaking mind," The Hill reported,
After the progressive Democrat responded that he was "rude" and the pair parted ways, Mr Yoho reportedly muttered aloud the phrase "f***ing bitch."
In a response on Tuesday, Ms Ocasio-Cortez tweeted that she had never spoken to Mr Yoho before he accosted her on the steps of the nation's Capitol building.
"Believe it or not, I usually get along fine w/ my GOP colleagues. We know how to check our legislative sparring at the committee door. But hey, “b*tches” get stuff done," the congresswoman wrote.



Nancy Pelosi wore a somber suit on Wednesday for the House debate on the votes to officially impeach President Donald Trump on two charges. (photo: Jim Lo Scalzo/EPA)
Nancy Pelosi wore a somber suit on Wednesday for the House debate on the votes to officially impeach President Donald Trump on two charges. (photo: Jim Lo Scalzo/EPA)

House Democrats to Attempt to Check Trump's Pardon Power
Mary Clare Jalonick, Associated Press
Jalonick writes: "House Democrats will try to rein in President Donald Trump's clemency powers on Thursday as they advance legislation that would discourage pardons for friends and family and prevent presidents from pardoning themselves."
READ MORE


NYPD officers arrest a protestor during a 'Black Lives Matter' demonstration on May 28, in New York City. (photo: Johannes Eisele/Getty)
NYPD officers arrest a protestor during a 'Black Lives Matter' demonstration on May 28, in New York City. (photo: Johannes Eisele/Getty)

NYPD Disappeared Black Lives Matter Protesters Into Detention for Days at a Time. Lawmakers Want to End the Practice.
Daniel A. Medina, The Intercept
Medina writes: "In early June, hundreds of Black Lives Matter protesters languished for days in cramped New York City jail cells. Stuck in holding pens without masks and exposed to soiled conditions amid the coronavirus pandemic, they were unable to reach loved ones or lawyers. The protesters were effectively disappeared into New York City's detention system."
READ MORE


A family from Haiti walk to the border to cross into Canada from Champlain, US. (photo: Christinne Muschi/Reuters)
A family from Haiti walk to the border to cross into Canada from Champlain, US. (photo: Christinne Muschi/Reuters)

Canada Court Rules Asylum Pact With US Is Invalid Due to Trump Administration's Violations of Refugee's Rights
Al Jazeera
Excerpt: "A Canadian court threw out the country's asylum pact with the United States on Wednesday, ruling that the 2004 agreement was invalid because Washington violates the rights of refugees and asylum seekers."
READ MORE


Yosemite National Park. (photo: iStock)
Yosemite National Park. (photo: iStock)

National Parks Are Getting Trashed During COVID-19, Endangering Surrounding Communities
Andrew R. Chow, TIME
Excerpt: "'I can't tell you how much pee and feces were littered along the trail,' Mora said. 'It's disgusting.'"

llie Mora has been running down the Santa Paula Canyon in Ventura County, Calif. on a weekly basis for years. She likes the serenity of the desert: the waterfalls that mist into placid green pools and the burnt orange wildflowers that bloom in the spring. For many like her, the park serves as a calming escape from the stresses and smog that can accompany everyday life in Southern California. 
But this spring, following the onset of coronavirus, the park’s condition started to drastically worsen. Litter accumulated on the sides of trails and at watering holes. Graffiti materialized on rocks. Parked cars stretched for more than a mile near the bottom of the trail, and hundreds of people splashed maskless in the canyon’s pools. 
The situation got so bad that the U.S. Forest Service shut down the trail in mid-May, citing the crowds and the trash. Since then, Mora and a team of volunteers have been working long days to clear out the litter and paint over the graffiti. 
“It’s been decimated by people who have never hiked before, coming back there with no morals,” she says. “It’s insane to see people acting the way they have, like the end of the world.” 
During the pandemic, Mora is far from the only one to witness worrying changes in national and state parks. Many of these spaces, supposed to be untouched swaths of time-proof wilderness, have been overrun by first-time visitors seeking refuge from quarantine, joblessness, or the inability to take far-flung vacations. And as people have flooded into the parks, new crises have arisen for rangers and nearby communities, including indigenous populations who were already particularly susceptible to the virus. 
“A lot of tourists who come through here, they think it’s unfair that we’re trying to have a lockdown and that we’re trying to keep outsiders out,” says Alberta Henry, a member of Navajo Nation who operates a camping rental business outside the Grand Canyon. “A caucasian man from Tennessee came onto the reservation and told my nephews, ‘Get those effing masks off! What’s wrong with you?’ People are openly racist, even in front of my children.”
“It’s completely packed”
Before the pandemic, national parks were already exploding in popularity. In 2019, the National Park Service tallied 327 million visits—9 million more than the previous year, and the third-highest total since record-keeping began in 1904. 
Many of these parks briefly shut down once the pandemic hit a crisis point in March and April. But as states began to reopen, so did parks, albeit with some restrictions. At Rocky Mountain National Park—the third most-visited national park in the country—rangers implemented a timed entry system in May, with the goal of keeping the park at 60% capacity. 
But eager backpackers have found a loophole around the restrictions: arriving early in the morning before the regulations are enforced. Paulina Arcuri, a Boulder resident who climbs and hikes regularly at the park, was accustomed to arriving before 6 a.m. to avoid the thunderstorms that roll through in the afternoon. Recently, she’s been arriving before the sunrise to a full parking lot. “It’s completely packed,” she says. “And before, it would usually be mostly Colorado license plates. Now, I’m seeing maybe 75% from out of state. There are so many Texas plates it’s insane.” 
Inside the park, Arcuri says the timed system isn’t preventing crowds from swelling at particular points like at lookout points or summits. “Even through a mask, it smells like you’re at Disneyland,” she says. She says she’s seen discarded masks strewn about the park, and that these newfound visitors aren’t paying heed to trail etiquette or environmental guidelines. “To step off the trail is to endanger 100-year-old moss,” she says.
Wendy Koenig, the mayor of Estes Park— the town that sits at the park’s entrance—says that campgrounds are full. Her downtown is full of visitors every weekend. Local businesses have enforced strict social distancing measures, and so far the number of cases in the town has been low. “It’s really in the hands of the visitors,” she says. “If they will cooperate and wear their masks, they can keep all of us safe and keep their vacation destinations open.” 
In interviews, rangers at Big Bend National Park in Texas, Great Falls Park in Maryland, and Glen Canyon National Recreation Area in Utah and Arizona said they have all seen increases in visitation following COVID-19, particularly from first-timers. RV and camper sales have surged; so have campground reservations across the country. With travelers still leery of airplanes, and most indoor entertainment options closed, many families seem to be embracing a relatively cheap getaway option where the risk of catching the virus is much lower than it is indoors. 
“We don’t want to take any chances” 
But this enthusiasm is sewing chaos and anxiety in communities connected to national parks—particularly indigenous communities who have been hit disproportionately hard by the virus. Limited health services, shaky infrastructure, and high rates of immunocompromising diseases have all increased the vulnerability of indigenous populations during the outbreak. 
In Montana, Glacier National Park borders the Blackfeet Nation. In past years, a good chunk of Glacier’s three million annual visitors entered the park through the Blackfeet reservation, providing a major boost to the local economy. But the Blackfeet decided to remain closed this summer, especially given a recent study that showed that in Montana, Native Americans made up more than a third of the state’s COVID-19 deaths despite making up less than 7 percent of its population. 
“Our elders are the keepers of our culture and history—they’re one of the most vulnerable,” Robert DesRosier, who leads the tribe’s COVID-19 response team, says. “We don’t want to take any chances of losing anybody.” 
The closure of one edge of the park has created a bottleneck on the other side, with harried rangers dealing with traffic congestion. Meanwhile, DesRosier says that visitors are still entering the reservation unwittingly. “We have people that still show up that are uninformed, who don’t even realize they’re on an Indian reservation,” he says. “We’ve had people that establish a private campground and invite guests in, or jump on a Side-by-Side or a four wheeler and drive it all over the country without permission.”
“We’ve been focusing on educating,” he says. “We’re trying hard not to take a punitive approach.” 
At the Grand Canyon, parks officials have worked with nearby tribes, including the Navajo Nation, to close off certain entrances to the park. But trash is still accumulating in the park, according to Alberta Henry, whose camping rental business is located outside the canyon. Emergency medical workers are short-staffed. And visitors are still coming into Navajo towns and wreaking havoc.
“The businesses here in Cameron [Ariz.] get negative feedback because tourists get mad about having to wear masks and use hand sanitizer before they come in stores,” Henry says.
Henry and three other members of her family contracted COVID-19 earlier in the year; she’s had to cancel hundreds of reservations, and her income has all but disappeared. Despite the economic hardship, Henry is deeply concerned about the rising cases in Arizona and says she is willing to stay closed until next season. “I’m really nervous,” she says. “I want it to be safe before I open again.” 
Big Bend National Park in Southwest Texas also shut down in early July after an employee contracted the virus and as cases in the region started to mount. “We’re 100 miles away from the nearest hospital, which is quite small,” ranger Adam Prato says. “If someone here is positive, that would be a real strain on the community.”
“Back to how it was”
Then there’s the impact on the parks themselves. Virginia State Parks rangers have reported “illegal all-terrain vehicle use, trash dumping,” and “boulders thrown from landmarks,” according to the Bay Journal. At Arizona lakes, visitors have left behind dirty diapers, shoes, broken glass and entire grills, AZ Central reported. 
Back at the aforementioned Santa Paula Canyon in the Los Padres National Forest, which is a convenient 90-minute drive from central Los Angeles and has long had a history with litter and graffiti, scenic photos shared by social media “influencers” from the canyon this spring spurred a copycat rush and an astonishing level of overcrowding. “I’d describe it as folks celebrating the 4th a couple months early,” says Andrew Madsen, a spokesperson for the forest. “You had too many people, and there was not a lot of practicing of social distancing or trail stewardship.” 
After the park’s closure, Mora and other volunteers have contributed hundreds of hours of cleanup work. Volunteers like these across the country are becoming increasingly crucial to the U.S. Forest Service and the National Park Service due to their already existing economic frailties. Many areas are understaffed and many repair work proposals have yet to be fulfilled; President Trump, during his tenure, has repeatedly proposed budget cuts to the organization. Since coronavirus, local budget shortfalls have led to the scaling back of some parks jobs—including a bear whisperer in Mammoth Lakes, Calif., who was in charge of keeping hikers safe from bears. 
Mora worries that when the Santa Paula Canyon opens back up on July 31, people will go right back to trashing it, and that she and other volunteers could be fighting an uphill battle for months or years to come. “This area was a beautiful, sacred place to the Native Americans who used to live here,” Mora says. “I hope we can turn it back to how it was before graffiti and trash were even in the canyon.”










Tuesday, July 21, 2020

+ 140,000 DEAD AMERICANS






Julian Borger at the Guardian on the unjustifiable meeting the indefensible in person -- i.e. John Yoo, of all people, consulting on presidential power for The Donald. Be anxious, very anxious! Tom
"The Trump administration has been consulting the former government lawyer who wrote the legal justification for waterboarding on how the president might try to rule by decree.
John Yoo told the Guardian he has been talking to White House officials about his view that a recent supreme court ruling on immigration would allow Trump to issue executive orders on whether to apply existing federal laws.
“If the court really believes what it just did, then it just handed President Trump a great deal of power, too,” Yoo, a professor at Berkeley Law, said.
“The supreme court has said President Obama could [choose not to] enforce immigration laws for about 2 million cases. And why can’t the Trump administration do something similar with immigration – create its own … program, but it could do it in areas beyond that, like healthcare, tax policy, criminal justice, inner city policy. I talked to them a fair amount about cities, because of the disorder.”
In a Fox News Sunday interview, Trump declared he would try to use that interpretation to try to force through decrees on healthcare, immigration and “various other plans” over the coming month. The White House consultations with Yoo were first reported by the Axios news website.
Constitutional scholars and human rights activists have also pointed to the deployment of paramilitary federal forces against protesters in Portland as a sign that Trump is ready to use this broad interpretation of presidential powers as a means to suppress basic constitutional rights.
“This is how it begins,” Laurence Tribe, a Harvard constitutional law professor, wrote on Twitter. “The dictatorial hunger for power is insatiable. If ever there was a time for peaceful civil disobedience, that time is upon us.”
Yoo became notorious for a legal memo he drafted in August 2002, when he was deputy assistant attorney general in the justice department’s office of legal counsel.
It stated: “Necessity or self-defense may justify interrogation methods that might violate” the criminal prohibition on torture.
Memos drafted by Yoo were used for justifying waterboarding and other forms of torture on terrorism suspects at CIA “black sites” around the world.
Asked if he now regretted his memos, Yoo replied: “I’m still not exactly sure about how far the CIA took its interrogation methods but I think if they stayed within the outlines of the legal memos, I think they weren’t violating American law.”
In a book titled Defender in Chief, due to be published next week, Yoo argues that Trump was fighting to restore the powers of the presidency, in a way that would have been approved by the framers of the US constitution.
“They wanted each branch to have certain constitutional weapons and then they wanted them to fight. And so they wanted the president to try to expand his powers but they expected also Congress to keep fighting with the President,” he said.
In a June article in the National Review, he wrote that a supreme court decision that blocked Trump’s attempt to repeal Barack Obama’s Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals programme, known as Daca and established by executive order, meant Trump could do the same thing to achieve his policy goals.
Daca suspended deportations of undocumented migrants who arrived in the US as children. As an example of what Trump might achieve in the same way, Yoo suggested the president could declare a national right to carry firearms openly, in conflict with many state laws.
“He could declare that he would not enforce federal firearms laws,” Yoo wrote, “and that a new ‘Trump permit’ would free any holder of state and local gun-control restrictions.
“Even if Trump knew that his scheme lacked legal authority, he could get away with it for the length of his presidency,” he said. In a telephone interview, he added: “According to the supreme court, the president can now choose to under-enforce the law in certain areas and it can’t be undone by his successor unless that successor goes through this onerous thing called the Administrative Procedure Act, which usually takes one to two years.”
Constitutional scholars have rejected Yoo’s arguments as ignoring limits on the executive powers of the president imposed by the founders, who were determined to prevent the rise of a tyrant.
Tribe called Yoo’s interpretation of the Daca ruling “indefensible”.
He added: “I fear that this lawless administration will take full advantage of the fact that judicial wheels grind slowly and that it will be difficult to keep up with the many ways Trump, aided and abetted by Bill Barr as attorney general and Chad Wolf as acting head of homeland security, can usurp congressional powers and abridge fundamental rights in the immigration space in particular but also in matters of public health and safety.”
On the deployment of federal paramilitary units against Portland, Yoo said he did not know enough of the facts to deem whether it was an abuse of executive power.
“It has to be really reasonably related to protecting federal buildings,” he said. “If it’s just graffiti, that’s not enough. It really depends on what the facts are.”
Alka Pradhan, a defence counsel in the 9/11 terrorism cases against inmates in the Guantánamo Bay prison camp, said: “John Yoo’s so-called reasoning has always been based on ‘What can the president get away with?’ rather than ‘What is the purpose and letter of the law?’
“That is not legal reasoning, it’s inherently tyrannical and anti-democratic.”
Pradhan and other defence lawyers in the pre-trial hearings at the Guantánamo Bay military tribunal have argued that the use of torture against their clients, made possible by Yoo’s 2002 memo, invalidated much of the case against them.
“The fact that John Yoo is employed and free to opine on legal matters is an example of the culture of impunity in the United States,” she said."








Image may contain: 1 person, text that says '"This is about more than just Portland. President Trump's secret police are kidnapping and holding citizens without charges for exercising their constitutionally-guaranteed rights. This is totalitarianism, and if it can happen in Portland, it can happen anywhere.' RON WYDEN, OREGON SENATOR RIDIN' WITH BIDEN'



Donald Trump on Tuesday signed a memo that aims to bar undocumented immigrants living in the country from being counted in the 2020 census.
It was not immediately clear how undocumented immigrants would be identified in order to omit them from the census count.The census questionnaire, which was distributed in March, did not require respondents to indicate whether they or others in their household are citizens.
The administration attempted last year to add a citizenship question on the 2020 census for the first time in 60 years, but the Supreme Court blocked the Department of Commerce, which oversees the census. In that decision, Chief Justice John Roberts joined the four-member liberal wing of the court and said the administration’s rationale for adding it was “contrived.”
The census results are used to determine the number of seats in the House of Representatives each state is allocated and impacts the dispersal of billions of federal dollars. Omitting undocumented immigrants has been criticized as an effort to reduce aid to states with large immigrant populations and to reduce the political clout of those areas, which are heavily represented by Democrats.
Trump's order is likely to prompt legal challenges from Democratic-controlled states that brought the previous lawsuit challenging the citizenship question as unconstitutional. In that case, the opponents argued that a citizenship question would discourage all immigrants from responding and jeopardize the constitutionally-mandated count.
The Constitution directs Congress to conduct a census count of "persons” living in the U.S., and does not distinguish between citizens and non-citizens. The Supreme Court has not directly ruled on whether "persons" includes immigrants, but lower courts have said undocumented immigrants should be counted.
"The resident population counts include all people (citizens and non-citizens) who are living in the United States at the time of the census,” according to the Census Bureau's website. “People are counted at their usual residence, which is the place where they live and sleep most of the time."
Trump railed against the Supreme Court decision, but the bureau printed and mailed questionnaires with only the standard questions about race, age, sex, and household size. However, soon after the court defeat last year, the administration was viewed as attempting to circumvent the decision and began asking states for drivers' license records that often include citizenship data, according to the Associated Press.
While the census count began in March, since the COVID-19 outbreak the timeline for completion has been delayed and updated and a final count is now expected to be delivered the presidents and states next year. People could respond to the census online for the first time this year.
This week, the census bureau began sending staff to households that have not responded. The bureau reported as of July 16th, 62 percent of U.S. households had completed their census form.





Image may contain: text that says 'Middle Age Riot @middleageriot We shouldn't blame Donald Trump for the 140,000 American deaths from COVID-19 He was impeached before the virus reached our shores. He shouldn't even have been president. Blame Mitch McConnell, Lindsey Graham, Ted Cruz, Marco Rubio, Rand Paul, Susan Collins, Rick Scott...'




Image may contain: one or more people and people standing



So yes, this guy is retiring, but this is completely unacceptable. Discussions about repercussions happening.
Her reaction:
"That kind of confrontation hasn't ever happened to me — ever," she said. "I've never had that kind of abrupt, disgusting kind of disrespect levied at me."
What happened:
Rep. Ted Yoho (R-Fla.) was coming down the steps on the east side of the Capitol on Monday, having just voted, when he approached Ocasio-Cortez, who was ascending into the building to cast a vote of her own.
In a brief but heated exchange, which was overheard by a reporter, Yoho told Ocasio-Cortez she was "disgusting" for recently suggesting that poverty and unemployment are driving a spike in crime in New York City during the coronavirus pandemic.
"You are out of your freaking mind," Yoho told her.
Ocasio-Cortez shot back, telling Yoho he was being "rude."
The two then parted ways. Ocasio-Cortez headed into the building, while Yoho, joined by Rep. Roger Williams (R-Texas), began descending toward the House office buildings. A few steps down, Yoho offered a parting thought to no one in particular.
"Fucking bitch," he said.





Image may contain: text that says 'Strong Women Scare Weak Men.'


The FEAR is worse when they're STUPID.
And if you look around, some of these REPUBLICANS are BRAIN DEAD and would not have been elected were it not for the GOP RIGGED ELECTIONS.




Trump RIDICULED as DOJ tells Appeals Court Trump is allowed to sell Presidential Records on EBAY!!

                                                                                                                                            ...