Showing posts with label RUTH BADER GINSBERG. Show all posts
Showing posts with label RUTH BADER GINSBERG. Show all posts

Saturday, June 19, 2021

RSN: FOCUS: Bess Levin | Surprise: Mitch Mcconnell Vows to Never Let Democrats Add a Justice to the Supreme Court Again

 

 

Reader Supported News
18 June 21


Come On Folks, Help the People Who Help

Yes, Reader Supported News really is supported entirely by the community it serves. Entirely. That is really how we do it. It’s people like you who just step up and say, “Okay, I’ll make a donation.”

Thank you!

Marc Ash
Founder, Reader Supported News

Sure, I'll make a donation!


Update My Monthly Donation


If you would prefer to send a check:
Reader Supported News
PO Box 2043
Citrus Hts, CA 95611

 

Reader Supported News
18 June 21

It's Live on the HomePage Now:
Reader Supported News


WITH THE MONEY YOU DONATE WE PAY PEOPLE: When you donate to RSN, we use that money to pay people for their work. Having a budget allows us to pass along to the contributors and those who work to make the project stronger fair wages. It’s not optional. Having a budget is required. Think of it as “fair-trade” publishing. This is the publication that the Readers built. Never forget that. / Marc Ash • Founder, Reader Supported News

Sure, I'll make a donation!



FOCUS: Bess Levin | Surprise: Mitch McConnell Vows to Never Let Democrats Add a Justice to the Supreme Court Again
Sen. Mitch McConnell. (photo: Carolyn Kaster/AP)
Bess Levin, Vanity Fair
Levin writes: "At least the world's most shameless hack is honest?"
 

hy do people run for office? For some, it’s to make a better world for their children. For others, it’s a passion for government. For Mitch McConnell, it’s to fuck over Democrats at every possible opportunity, his neck pouch quivering with joy as he shreds small “d” democracy over and over and over again.

Obviously, one of McConnell’s favorite ways to screw not just his colleagues on the other side of the aisle but the millions of Americans who voted for them is by denying the other party the ability to add justices to the Supreme Court, based on made-up logic he literally pulls out of his ass as it suits him. In 2016, of course, he spent nearly an entire year blocking Barack Obama’s Supreme Court nominee, Merrick Garland, claiming that presidents aren’t allowed to put someone on the court in an election year and that he had to delay the confirmation so the voters could decide. (They did, and it was in 2012 when they decided they wanted Obama to be president again.)

Fast-forward four years later, though, and with just weeks to go until the 2020 election, McConnell didn’t just ram through Amy Coney Barrett‘s confirmation, he announced he would do so basically before Ruth Bader Ginsburg‘s body was cold. The night RBG died, McConnell, the most shameless man to ever live, released a statement saying that he would move quickly to confirm Trump’s nominee, rewriting the completely arbitrary rule he invented to block Obama’s replacement for Antonin Scalia. And to lay the hackery on extra thick, he cast his absurd reversal as a fulfillment of a promise to the American people. “In the last midterm election before Justice Scalia’s death in 2016,” McConnell said, “Americans elected a Republican Senate majority because we pledged to check and balance the last days of a lame-duck president’s term. We kept our promise. Since the 1880s, no Senate has confirmed an opposite-party president’s Supreme Court nominee in a presidential election year. By contrast, Americans reelected our majority in 2016 and expanded it in 2018 because we pledged to work with President Trump and support his agenda, particularly his outstanding appointments to the federal judiciary. Once again, we will keep our promise.” Then he went on to clear the way for a woman who thinks there are some instances when abortion should be punishable by death to be confirmed to a lifetime appointment on the highest court in the land with the election less than 2 months away.

At this point, you could reasonably assume that with Joe Biden in power, McConnell would once again revert to his position that presidents can’t seat someone on the court within an election year. And of course, he has. But he’s also amended the policy to basically state that he’ll never let a Democratic president get a justice on the Supreme Court again so long as he’s in power, even if said president has nearly two years left on his term.

McConnell wasn’t asked about confirming a Democratic nominee in 2021 or 2022 because he is not actually the majority leader at the moment, but it’s pretty clear if he was he’d come up with—and implement—some kind of rule saying that only Republicans can add justices to court. Which is obviously insane and corrupt and shameless but hey, that’s Mitch, the guy who said last month that he is “100%” focused on blocking Biden‘s agenda, up to and including all the parts that might actually help Americans. Which would explain why many people are openly begging for Justice Stephen Breyer, 81, to retire. Asked about the situation on Sunday, Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez told CNN, “You know, it’s something I think about, but I would probably lean towards yes.… I would give more thought to it, but I’m inclined to say yes.” She did not add, “Because Biden needs to get a liberal on the court before that old crone from Kentucky can snatch the seat out of Democrats’ fingers,” but presumably she was thinking it.

P.S. Trump’s Justice Department spied on White House employees too

It wasn’t just his congressional nemeses and enemies in the press. Per The New York Times:

The Justice Department subpoenaed Apple for information in February 2018 about an account that belonged to Donald F. McGahn II, President Donald J. Trump’s White House counsel at the time, and barred the company from telling him about it, according to two people briefed on the matter. Apple told Mr. McGahn about the subpoena last month, said one of the people, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss the matter. Mr. McGahn’s wife also received a similar notice from Apple, the person said.

It is not clear what FBI agents were investigating, whether Mr. McGahn was their specific focus, or whether he was swept up in a larger net because he had communicated with someone who was under scrutiny. As the top lawyer for the 2016 Trump campaign and then the White House counsel, Mr. McGahn was in contact with numerous people who may have drawn attention either as part of the Russia investigation or a later leak inquiry. Still, the disclosure that agents had collected data of a sitting White House counsel, which they kept secret for years, is extraordinary.

While we don’t know exactly what the DOJ was looking for, as the Times notes, we do know things were tense between Trump and McGahn around the time the department went after the White House counsel’s records. A month prior, per the Times, Trump had “tried to persuade Mr. McGahn to make a statement falsely denying” that he’d been asked to fire special counsel Robert Mueller, as press reports had indicated. Trump is said to have told aides that McGahn was a “liar” and a “leaker,” according to former Trump administration officials. And it seems he decided to use the power of the DOJ to go after him!

Area senator temporarily blocked from spreading bullshit medical advice

Ron Johnson knows what we’re talking about:

YouTube suspended GOP senator Ron Johnson’s account on Friday after he posted comments regarding dubious treatments for COVID-19. “We removed the video in accordance with our COVID-19 medical misinformation policies, which don’t allow content that encourages people to use hydroxychloroquine or ivermectin to treat or prevent the virus,” a YouTube spokesperson said in a statement to CNN.... For months Johnson—who tested positive for coronavirus last fall—has spread anti-vaccine misinformation and downplayed the urgency of vaccinating all Americans against COVID-19, putting the controversial Wisconsin Republican at odds with public health guidance aimed at easing the ongoing pandemic. The two-term senator, who’s facing reelection next year, has also downplayed the seriousness of the insurrection at the U.S. Capitol on January 6.

YouTube doesn’t allow medical misinformation about COVID-19, including anything that recommends use of ivermectin or hydroxychloroquine for the treatment or prevention of COVID-19, according to the company. In July of 2020, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration revoked an emergency use authorization for hydroxychloroquine and chloroquine to treat COVID-19. The agency now says hydroxychloroquine and chloroquine have not been shown to be safe and effective for treating or preventing COVID-19.

Hydroxychloroquine, of course, was one of Dr. Donald Trump’s big recommendations to the public, second only to his suggestion that they shoot up household cleaner, leading the manufacturer of Lysol to issue a statement saying that “under no circumstance” should disinfectant be injected into one’s body.

In an extremely huffy statement, Johnson told CNN that YouTube has “decided there is only one medical viewpoint allowed and it is the viewpoint dictated by government agencies. YouTube’s ongoing COVID censorship proves they have accumulated too much unaccountable power. Big Tech and mainstream media believe they are smarter than medical doctors who have devoted their lives to science and use their skills to save lives.”

Marjorie Taylor Greene is sorry about that stuff she said about Jews

Just kidding, she’s sorry she’s getting backlash over it, and is hoping this stunt field trip to the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum helps:

Freshman Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene paid a visit to the Holocaust museum on Monday in a bid to defuse the controversy over her comments comparing vaccine and mask requirements to Nazi Germany.... Greene’s museum visit comes as one Jewish House Democrat, Illinois rep. Brad Schneider, prepares to introduce a censure resolution condemning Greene’s latest comments on the Holocaust. Some Democrats are already privately discussing censure as a potential response to a group of Republican lawmakers pushing a censure resolution against one of their caucus members, Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.), for her recent remarks on Israel.

Last month Greene claimed that “any rational Jewish person” thinks mask mandates are as bad as the Holocaust. She’s also previously blamed California wildfires on Jewish space lasers.

READ MORE



Contribute to RSN

Update My Monthly Donation





Thursday, April 1, 2021

RSN: FOCUS: Ruth Bader Ginsburg | May the Spirit of Liberty Be Your Beacon

 

 

Reader Supported News
31 March 21

It's Live on the HomePage Now:
Reader Supported News


“TODAY” REALLY MATTERS FOR DONATIONS — We are not making the kind of progress in terms of finishing the fundraising drive that we normally do. Still only a small fraction of you have responded. Today is a critical day for donations. Very important now. / Marc Ash, Founder Reader Supported News

Sure, I'll make a donation!


FOCUS: Ruth Bader Ginsburg | May the Spirit of Liberty Be Your Beacon
Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, in her chambers at the Supreme Court in Washington. (photo: Todd Heisler/NYT)
Ruth Bader Ginsburg, The Daily Beast

May the Spirit of Liberty Be Your Beacon 

As a new U.S. citizen, you couldn't ask for a more thoughtful welcome than this speech by the late Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg at a 2018 naturalization ceremony in Washington, D.C.

n December 18, 2018, the late Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg welcomed new U.S. citizens at a naturalization ceremony at the National Archives in Washington, D.C.

My fellow Americans, it is my great privilege to welcome you to citizenship in the democracy that is the USA. You number 31 and came here from 26 countries, alphabetically, from China to Venezuela. Today, you join more than 20 million current citizens, born in other lands, who chose, as you have, to make the United States of America their home. We are a nation made strong by people like you who traveled long distances, overcame great obstacles, and made tremendous sacrifices—all to provide a better life for themselves and their families.

My own father arrived in this land at age 13, with no fortune and speaking no English. My mother was born four months after her parents, with several children in tow, came by ship to Ellis Island. My father and grandparents reached, as you do, for the American dream. As testament to our nation’s promise, the daughter and granddaughter of immigrants sits on the highest Court in the land. In America, land of opportunity, that prospect is within the realm of the achievable. What is the difference between a bookkeeper in New York City’s garment district and a Supreme Court Justice? One generation, my life bears witness, the difference between opportunities available to my mother and those afforded me.

You have studied our system of government and know of its twin pillars. First, our government has limited powers; it can exercise only the authority expressly given to it by the Constitution. And second, citizens of this country enjoy certain fundamental rights. Those rights are our nation’s hallmark. They are set forth in the Bill of Rights, and other provisions of, or amendments to, the Constitution. They are inalienable, yielding to no governmental decree. Our Constitution opens with the words: “We the People of the United States.” By limiting government, specifying rights, and empowering the people, the founders of the United States proclaimed that the heart of America would be its citizens, not its rulers.

After the words “We the People of the United States,” the Constitution sets out the aspiration “to form a more perfect Union.” At the start, it is true, the union very much needed perfection. The original Constitution permitted slavery and severely limited who counted among “We the People.” When the nation was new, only white, property-owning men had the right to vote, the most basic right of citizenship. But over the course of our history, people left out at the beginning—people held in human bondage, Native Americans, and half the population, women, came to be embraced as full citizens. A French observer of early America, Alexis de Tocqueville, wrote that “[t]he greatness of America lies not in being more enlightened than… other nation[s], but rather in her ability to repair her faults.” Through amendments to our Constitution, and court decisions applying those amendments, we abolished slavery, prohibited racial discrimination, and made men and women people of equal citizenship stature. In the vanguard of those perfections were people just like you—new Americans of every race and creed, making ever more vibrant our national motto: e pluribus unum—out of many, one.

Though we have made huge progress, the work of perfection is scarcely done. Many stains remain. In this rich land, nearly a quarter of our children live in poverty, nearly half of our citizens do not vote, and we still struggle to achieve greater understanding and appreciation of each other across racial, religious, and socioeconomic lines. Yet we strive to realize the ideal—to become a more perfect union. As well informed new citizens, you will play a vital part in that endeavor by, first and foremost, voting in elections, also serving on juries, and engaging in civic discourse.

We sing of America, “sweet land of liberty.” Newcomers to our shores, people like you, came here, from the earliest days of our nation to today, “[seeking] liberty—freedom from oppression, freedom from want, freedom to be [you and me].” I would like to convey to you, finally, how a great American jurist—Judge Learned Hand—understood liberty. He explained in 1944 what liberty meant to him when he greeted a large assemblage of new Americans gathered in New York City’s Central Park to swear allegiance to the United States. These are Judge Hand’s words: Just what is this sacred liberty that “must lie in the hearts of men and women? It is not the ruthless, the unbridled will; it is not freedom to do as one likes.”

I cannot define [the spirit of liberty]; I can only tell you my own faith. The spirit of liberty is the spirit which is not too sure that it is right; the spirit of liberty is the spirit which seeks to understand the minds of other men and women; the spirit of liberty is the spirit which weighs their interest alongside its own without bias.

May the spirit of liberty, as Judge Hand explained it, be your beacon. May you have the conscience and courage to act in accord with that high ideal as you play your part in helping to achieve a more perfect Union.

Excerpt from Justice, Justice Thou Shalt Pursue: A Life’s Work Fighting for a More Perfect Union, by Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Amanda Tyler. Copyright Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Amanda Tyler and the University of California Press.


READ MORE


Contribute to RSN

Update My Monthly Donation




Sunday, September 20, 2020

Bob Woodward Induced A Confession Of The Greatest Lie In American History Says Steve Schmidt | MSNBC



Steve Schmidt: Trump Is A ‘Dime Store Slurring Mussolini’ | The 11th Hour | MSNBC

Steve Schmidt reacts to Trump's Constitution Day speech, criticized as one of the darkest of his presidency, where Trump leveled political broadsides at 'the Left' and talked about 'patriotic education' all while inside the National Archives steps from the Bill of Rights. Aired on 09/17/2020.



Founder of the Lincoln Project Steve Schmidt reacts to the number of taped interviews released by journalist Bob Woodward showing just how much the president downplayed the coronavirus while knowing how deadly it really was. Aired on 09/16/2020.



Republicans Face Test Of Honor, Integrity In Handling Of Ginsburg Seat: Sen. Booker | MSNBC

Senator Cory Booker talks with Rachel Maddow about whether Democrats can win a principled political fight with Republicans who have shifted to raw power grab tactics, and what that means for the future of the Supreme Court




Coupon-Cutting Congresswoman Stumps Big Bank CEO | The Last Word | MSNBC

Freshman Democratic Congresswoman Katie Porter asked JP Morgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon a simple arithmetic question about his employee's pay. Rep. Katie Porter join's Lawrence to explain why he couldn't answer.



Saturday, September 19, 2020

My Statement on the Passing of Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg


The Remarkable RBG ...
It is difficult to add much to the tributes being shared on social media right now. The trail-blazing life of Ruth Bader Ginsburg left an indelible mark on this nation. She was the living embodiment of gender equality. She fought her way through the door and into the room where it happens.
She was a consistent voice of reason on the Supreme Court. She understood the importance of civil rights and the value of our democracy. She never wavered in her belief that the Constitution of the United States was meant to protect freedom, not oppress it. She held firm to that sacred conviction even as cancer kept trying to silence her voice.
This diminutive giant finally passed away at 87 yesterday, but her voice will never be silenced. It will echo throughout this country for a long, long time. Every women who has felt objectified in the workplace owes her a debt of gratitude. Every little girl who dares to dream big dreams will remember her name. Her life was proof that a woman can be brilliant, kind and determined all at the same time.
Even if Ruth Bader Ginsburg had never sat on the Supreme Court her work as a lawyer would have left a lasting legacy. If you have not seen the film "On The Basis Of Sex" you should. It is a profile in courage about a woman who simply refused to allow discrimination to stand.
We knew her death would launch a political firestorm. We didn't expect Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell to step on her memory the day she died. His announcement to immediately replace her may have been the most callous moment in the history of American politics. People were just absorbing the news when McConnell turned it political. Never has the difference between integrity and dishonor been more clear. The Republicans did not allow the country to mourn the loss of an American icon. They made it about them.
It is doubtful that Senate Republicans can get a confirmation hearing done before the Nov. 3 election. Beyond the mere logistical challenge many Republican senators in tight races don't want that kind of circus right before the election. They don't want McConnell's hypocrisy of blocking Merrick Garland's appointment in 2016 to take center stage. They would prefer to proceed during the lame duck session after the election. But that's no slam dunk. Three Republican senators have already indicated their preference to allow Joe Biden to make the pick if he wins the election. If one more GOP senator joins them McConnell's ploy will fail.
That is why it is so crucial to defeat Donald Trump on Nov. 3. If he wins the Supreme Court will have a 6-3 conservative split. The progressive dream will die in court for decades. Everything RBG fought for her entire life could be lost.
So vote. Get your friends to vote. Donate money to a candidate. Carry a sign. Work at a phone bank. Write a letter to the editor. Do whatever you can to preserve a life's work that's worth preserving. Do it for her. She earned it.




I couldn't resist!
"Stolen Satire:
DEAR RED STATES... WE'VE DECIDED WE'RE LEAVING.
Dear Red States...
We've decided we're leaving. We intend to form our own country, and we're taking the other Blue States with us. In case you aren't aware, that includes Hawaii, Oregon, California, New Mexico, Washington, Minnesota, Wisconsin, Michigan, Illinois and all the Northeast.
We believe this split will be beneficial to the nation, and especially to the people of the new country of New Puerto Rico, U.S. Virgin Islands, Guam and Washington D.C. We also get Costco and Boeing.
To sum up briefly: You get Texas, Oklahoma and all the slave states. We get stem cell research and the best beaches.
We get the Statue of Liberty. You get Branson, Missouri.
We get Intel and Microsoft. You get WorldCom. We get 85 percent of America's venture capital and entrepreneurs. You get Alabama. We get two-thirds of the tax revenue, you get to make the red states pay their fair share. Since our aggregate divorce rate is 22 percent lower than the Christian Coalition's, we get a bunch of happy families.
Please be aware that Nuevo California will be pro-choice and
anti-war, and we're going to want all our citizens back from Iraq at once. If you need people to fight, ask your evangelicals. They have kids they're apparently willing to send to their deaths for no purpose, and they don't care if you don't show pictures of their children's caskets coming home.
With the Blue States in hand, we will have firm control of 80 percent of the country's fresh water, more than 90 percent of the pineapple and lettuce, 92 percent of the nation's fresh fruit, 95 percent of America's quality wines (you can serve French wines at state dinners) 90 percent of all cheese, 90 percent of the high tech industry, most of the U.S. low-sulfur coal, all living redwoods, sequoias and condors, all the Ivy and Seven Sister schools, plus Harvard, Yale, Stanford, Cal Tech and MIT.
With the Red States, on the other hand, you will have to cope with 88 percent of all obese Americans (and their projected health care costs), 92 percent of all U.S. mosquitoes, nearly 100 percent of the tornadoes, 90 percent of the hurricanes, 99 percent of all Southern Baptists, virtually 100 percent of all televangelists, Rush Limbaugh, Alex Jones and Rand Paul.
We get Hollywood and Yo*se*mi*te, thank you.
Additionally, 62 percent of you believe life is sacred unless we're discussing the death penalty or gun laws, 44 percent say that evolution is only a theory, 53 percent that Saddam was involved in 9/11 and 61 percent of you crazy bastards believe you are people with higher morals then we lefties.
Oh, and you can have all The new Corona cases since you're too dumb and self- centered to wear a mask.
Peace out, we are the people!
Blue States
Thank you Angelica Kefalas




“Sixty years ago, Ruth Bader Ginsburg applied to be a Supreme Court clerk. She’d studied at two of our finest law schools and had ringing recommendations. But because she was a woman, she was rejected. Ten years later, she sent her first brief to the Supreme Court — which led it to strike down a state law based on gender discrimination for the first time. And then, for nearly three decades, as the second woman ever to sit on the highest court in the land, she was a warrior for gender equality — someone who believed that equal justice under law only had meaning if it applied to every single American.
Over a long career on both sides of the bench — as a relentless litigator and an incisive jurist — Justice Ginsburg helped us see that discrimination on the basis of sex isn’t about an abstract ideal of equality; that it doesn’t only harm women; that it has real consequences for all of us. It’s about who we are — and who we can be.
Justice Ginsburg inspired the generations who followed her, from the tiniest trick-or-treaters to law students burning the midnight oil to the most powerful leaders in the land. Michelle and I admired her greatly, we’re profoundly thankful for the legacy she left this country, and we offer our gratitude and our condolences to her children and grandchildren tonight.
Ruth Bader Ginsburg fought to the end, through her cancer, with unwavering faith in our democracy and its ideals. That’s how we remember her. But she also left instructions for how she wanted her legacy to be honored.
Four and a half years ago, when Republicans refused to hold a hearing or an up-or-down vote on Merrick Garland, they invented the principle that the Senate shouldn’t fill an open seat on the Supreme Court before a new president was sworn in.
A basic principle of the law — and of everyday fairness — is that we apply rules with consistency, and not based on what’s convenient or advantageous in the moment. The rule of law, the legitimacy of our courts, the fundamental workings of our democracy all depend on that basic principle. As votes are already being cast in this election, Republican Senators are now called to apply that standard. The questions before the Court now and in the coming years — with decisions that will determine whether or not our economy is fair, our society is just, women are treated equally, our planet survives, and our democracy endures — are too consequential to future generations for courts to be filled through anything less than an unimpeachable process.”
Link: https://obama.medium.com/my-statement-on-the-passing-of-justice-ruth-bader-ginsburg-5a925b627457

My Statement on the Passing of Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg


Sixty years ago, Ruth Bader Ginsburg applied to be a Supreme Court clerk. She’d studied at two of our finest law schools and had ringing recommendations. But because she was a woman, she was rejected. Ten years later, she sent her first brief to the Supreme Court — which led it to strike down a state law based on gender discrimination for the first time. And then, for nearly three decades, as the second woman ever to sit on the highest court in the land, she was a warrior for gender equality — someone who believed that equal justice under law only had meaning if it applied to every single American.

Over a long career on both sides of the bench — as a relentless litigator and an incisive jurist — Justice Ginsburg helped us see that discrimination on the basis of sex isn’t about an abstract ideal of equality; that it doesn’t only harm women; that it has real consequences for all of us. It’s about who we are — and who we can be.

Justice Ginsburg inspired the generations who followed her, from the tiniest trick-or-treaters to law students burning the midnight oil to the most powerful leaders in the land. Michelle and I admired her greatly, we’re profoundly thankful for the legacy she left this country, and we offer our gratitude and our condolences to her children and grandchildren tonight.

Ruth Bader Ginsburg fought to the end, through her cancer, with unwavering faith in our democracy and its ideals. That’s how we remember her. But she also left instructions for how she wanted her legacy to be honored.

Four and a half years ago, when Republicans refused to hold a hearing or an up-or-down vote on Merrick Garland, they invented the principle that the Senate shouldn’t fill an open seat on the Supreme Court before a new president was sworn in.

A basic principle of the law — and of everyday fairness — is that we apply rules with consistency, and not based on what’s convenient or advantageous in the moment. The rule of law, the legitimacy of our courts, the fundamental workings of our democracy all depend on that basic principle. As votes are already being cast in this election, Republican Senators are now called to apply that standard. The questions before the Court now and in the coming years — with decisions that will determine whether or not our economy is fair, our society is just, women are treated equally, our planet survives, and our democracy endures — are too consequential to future generations for courts to be filled through anything less than an unimpeachable process. 









I hope there is still time to undo the damage.


LINK










This Weekend in Politics, Bulletin 441.

                                                                               LOTS OF POSTS IGNORED BY BLOGGER..... OR REMOVED ON THEIR WHI...