Showing posts with label PRESIDENTIAL ELECTIONS. Show all posts
Showing posts with label PRESIDENTIAL ELECTIONS. Show all posts

Saturday, November 7, 2020

RSN: Robert Reich | Thanking You

 

 

Reader Supported News
07 November 20


Waving Hands for Donations

Super important to get these few donations in. The dollar figures are by no means daunting. Your donation has made the difference in building RSN from day one. Invest in freedom support RSN with a donation.

Thank you sincerely,

Marc Ash
Founder, Reader Supported News

Sure, I'll make a donation!


Update My Monthly Donation

If you would prefer to send a check:
Reader Supported News
PO Box 2043
Citrus Hts, CA 95611


 

Reader Supported News
07 November 20

It's Live on the HomePage Now:
Reader Supported News


WE’RE GOING TO GET KILLED UNLESS WE FIGHT - In fundraising as in political life it is a struggle out there. RSN gets nothing in terms of funding we do not fight for. We would much rather be putting the time and attention into research and publishing, but we must have a budget. Your contribution matters. Bring it on please. / Marc Ash, Founder Reader Supported News

Sure, I'll make a donation!


Robert Reich | Thanking You
Former Clinton labor secretary Robert Reich. (photo: Steve Russell/Toronto Star)
Robert Reich, Robert Reich's Blog
Reich writes: "The only good thing Trump has done is to awaken many of us to injustices that have plagued our country for centuries."

Over the past four years, we’ve taken to the streets to raise our voices – from protecting the sovereignty of Indigenous land and water, to demanding an end to systemic racism and police brutality, to fighting back against nonstop attacks on reproductive freedom, and so much more.

This unprecedented wave of activism has made one thing clear: The American people are fired up.

And now we are taking that momentum to the ballot box. We are voting not only for ourselves and our family’s future, but for our community, for those whose votes have been suppressed, and for the survival of American democracy itself.

We’ve made millions of phone calls, sent thousands of letters, and knocked on who knows how many doors. We’ve mobilized our families, friends, and neighbors to head to the polls.

We are a multi-racial, multi-class coalition that’s come together in unprecedented solidarity to send this racist, narcissistic man packing.

READ MORE



Joe Biden. (photo: Mike Blake/Reuters)
Joe Biden. (photo: Mike Blake/Reuters)


Biden Inches Closer to Victory as Trump's Chances Fade
Alana Wise, NPR
Wise writes: "Four days after Americans cast the final ballots in the 2020 White House race, votes are still being counted but Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden has maintained his lead in electoral votes."
READ MORE


A healthcare worker and a patient. (photo: ABC News)
A healthcare worker and a patient. (photo: ABC News)



US Tops 125,000 Daily Coronavirus Infections - a Record High
Christina Maxouris, Jay Croft and Harmeet Kaur, CNN
Excerpt: "The United States set a new record on Friday when it surpassed 125,000 daily coronavirus infections, while Covid-19 hospitalizations continued to climb, prompting health experts to issue dire predictions."
READ MORE



Scott Walden was placed on leave following a Facebook post in which he threatened supporters of Joe Biden. (photo: Flowmeton Police Department)
Scott Walden was placed on leave following a Facebook post in which he threatened supporters of Joe Biden. (photo: Flowmeton Police Department)


Police Captain Who Said Biden Voters Should Get a 'Bullet in Their Skull' Has Been Put on Leave
Trone Dowd, VICE
Dowd writes: "An Alabama police captain who said Joe Biden voters should get 'a bullet in their skull' has been placed on administrative leave."


The Alabama officer only made it worse when he tried to explain his Facebook comment later.

Capt. Scott Walden of the Flomaton Police Department could face termination for writing the graphic comment under a fellow Trump supporter’s post on Facebook.

“Idiots that voted for Biden hated Trump enough to throw the country away,” the person commented, to which Walden replied, “they need to line up ev1 of them and put a bullet in their skull for treason.”

The comment was screen-shotted and began circulating on social media Wednesday. Walden later deleted the post, but the damage was done. After receiving an undisclosed number of complaints about the captain’s words, the Flomaton Police Department launched an internal investigation and placed the captain on leave.

“The Flomaton Police Department treasures the community’s trust, and this is achieved through transparency regarding public information,” the department said in a statement Thursday evening. “The Flomaton Police Department holds officer’s conduct to the highest standard and will continue to do so. Copies of the comments and complaints have been acquired and retained for Internal Investigations.

Walden later argued online that his comments had been misconstrued, saying he didn’t mean that all Democrats need to be executed, just the ones who commit treason, according to screenshots taken by CBS affiliate WHNT.

“The comment even says TREASON but someone has run rampant saying I was meaning liberal n Democrats,” he wrote. “Well #1 I don’t care who you vote for, #2 the comment was about treason and what should happen to the ones who are charged for committing treason. So either you trying to stir the pot or you are ok with someone committing treason but not ok with someone who says they should be shot. This is the world we live in.”

While Walden can ask for a fair hearing in order to save his job, it may be a bit of a battle. Flomaton Mayor Dewey Bondurant told local media that Walden has had a history of making controversial comments on social media, something he’s warned him about before, and that he personally wants to see him removed from his post.

“That’s what I wanted to do to start with, but by law, I can’t,” the mayor said Thursday.

It’s been a tough few days for some of the president’s most passionate supporters around the country. After a promising start on Election Night, the president’s chances for reelection have dwindled significantly. Supporters in Michigan, Arizona, Georgia and Pennsylvania have protested outside of counting locations demanding that officials count the ballots properly and fairly, despite there being no evidence of illicit activity in the tallying process.

That hasn’t stopped President Trump from fomenting conspiracy. Thursday evening, Trump took to the White House Briefing Room and spewed lies attempting to delegitimize mail-in ballots as illegal and tried to claim victory in states he continues to lose traction in. As it stands now, Biden is set to officially win the election before the end of the day Friday.


READ MORE



Democratic House candidate Sharice Davids at a victory party in Olathe, Kansas, on Nov. 6, 2018. Davids defeated Republican incumbent Kevin Yoder to win the 3rd Congressional District seat in Kansas. (photo: Colin E. Braley/AP)
Democratic House candidate Sharice Davids at a victory party in Olathe, Kansas, on Nov. 6, 2018. Davids defeated Republican incumbent Kevin Yoder to win the 3rd Congressional District seat in Kansas. (photo: Colin E. Braley/AP)


A Record-Breaking 6 Native Americans Were Elected to Congress on Tuesday
Caitlin O'Kane, CBS News
O'Kane writes: "Six Native American and Native Hawaiian were elected to the House of Representatives on Tuesday - a record-breaking number."

ix Native American and Native Hawaiian were elected to the House of Representatives on Tuesday — a record-breaking number.

Democratic Representative Sharice Davids won reelection in Kansas, CBS News projects. She defeated Amanda Adkins, becoming the only Democrat representing Kansas in the House.

In Hawaii, Democratic candidate Kaiali'i Kahele defeated his Republican challenger Joe Akana, CBS News projects. Kahele will be only the second Native Hawaiian to represent the state in Congress.

In Oklahoma, CBS News projects both Representative Tom Cole and Representative Markwayne Mullin, two Republicans, won reelection.

Democratic Congresswoman Debra Haaland of New Mexico also won reelection. Republican Yvette Herrell also won in New Mexico.

According to Indian Country Today, a total of 13 Native American candidates were competing for House seats this year. The six winners have set a record. The group is split evenly by party — three Democrats and three Republicans.

In 2019, Cole and Haaland became co-chairs of the bipartisan Congressional Native American Caucus, which "seeks to educate members of Congress and encourage an open dialogue about issues affecting Native Americans," according to a press release from Cole's office.

"As part of this mission, the caucus regularly convenes briefings, considers the impact of legislation on tribal nations and provides a forum for members of Congress to exchange information, ideas and research." In 2016 only four member of Congress were Native American, according to the release.

Cole is a member of the Chickasaw Nation of Oklahoma. Haaland is a member of the Pueblo of Laguna who also has Jemez Pueblo heritage.

Davids, who in 2018 became the first Native American congresswoman, is also one of the few openly gay women in Congress. She is a member of the Ho-Chunk Nation.

Herrell is a member of the Cherokee Nation, according to the Albuquerque Journal. Representative Markwayne Mullin is a member of the Cherokee Nation as well.

Kahele, who served as a state senator in Hawaii, is of Native Hawaiian ancestry; his family comes from the small fishing village of Miloli'i in South Kona.


READ MORE


People gather and light up their smartphones or lanterns to form an inscription saying WYBÓR ('choice'), along with a lightning bolt, to show solidarity with the protests against the Constitutional Court ruling on tightening the abortion law at Blonia Park on November 03, 2020, in Krakow, Poland. (photo: Omar Marques/Getty Images)
People gather and light up their smartphones or lanterns to form an inscription saying WYBÓR ('choice'), along with a lightning bolt, to show solidarity with the protests against the Constitutional Court ruling on tightening the abortion law at Blonia Park on November 03, 2020, in Krakow, Poland. (photo: Omar Marques/Getty Images)


Poland's Historic Fight for Abortion Rights
Kinga Stanczuk, Jacobin
Stanczuk writes: "Last week, Poland banned abortion after its government stacked the courts with right-wing ideologues. But they didn't count on women fighting back - and now they face a historic wave of protest."
READ MORE



The gray wolf once numbered in the tens of thousands in the U.S., but was pushed to the brink of extinction. (photo: National Geographic)
The gray wolf once numbered in the tens of thousands in the U.S., but was pushed to the brink of extinction. (photo: National Geographic)

ALSO SEE: Wolves Win in Colorado After Vote for
Reintroduction by 2023

Gray Wolves to Be Removed From Endangered Species List
Nathan Rott, NPR
Rott writes: "Gray wolves, a species that has long been vilified and admired, will no longer receive federal protections under the Endangered Species Act in the Lower 48 U.S. states, the Trump administration announced Thursday."

The long-anticipated move is drawing praise from those who want to see the iconic species managed by state and tribal governments, and harsh criticism from those who believe federal protections should remain in place until wolves inhabit more of their historical range. Gray wolves used to exist across most of North America.

"After more than 45 years as a listed species, the gray wolf has exceeded all conservation goals for recovery," said Interior Secretary David Bernhardt, announcing the delisting, which will revert management of wolf populations to local wildlife agencies.

Federal wildlife officials are hailing the move as a success story, similar to endangered species recovery stories such as the bald eagle and American alligator.

After being nearly wiped clean from the contiguous U.S. by the mid-20th century, there are now more than 6,000 gray wolves in the Lower 48 states, largely clustered in the Northern Rocky Mountains and the Western Great Lakes region.

Critics are calling the move premature, though, and are already promising to sue.

"This is no 'Mission Accomplished' moment for wolf recovery," said Kristen Boyles, an attorney for Earthjustice. "Wolves are only starting to get a toehold in places like Northern California and the Pacific Northwest, and wolves need federal protection to explore habitat in the Southern Rockies and the Northeast."

Some critics are portraying the move as another environmental attack by the Trump administration, which has rolled back dozens of environmental regulations, including protections for endangered species and migratory birds. But wolves have a complicated history that doesn't fit cleanly into the bipartisan rancor that now dominates U.S. environmental policies.

After being hunted, trapped, poisoned and harassed to the point of near extirpation in the contiguous U.S., all gray wolves south of Canada were given federal protections under the Endangered Species Act in 1978.

Under that protection, their numbers slowly recovered in the Great Lakes region, and in 1995 federal wildlife officials reintroduced gray wolves to central Idaho and Yellowstone National Park, where their population has since flourished.

In 2013, the Obama administration also proposed to delist gray wolves, saying that the species had rebounded to the point where they were no longer at risk of extinction and should be managed by state and tribal governments.

A couple of years earlier, wolf populations in Montana and Idaho were delisted by a congressional budget rider, authored by a Democrat and Republican senator in each of those states who were pressured by agricultural and sportsmen groups. Wolves are an apex predator that, at times, kill livestock. Subsequent lawsuits saw gray wolves get delisted, relisted and delisted again in Wyoming.

Today, state wildlife agencies manage wolf populations in Montana, Idaho and Wyoming, and hunting of the species is permitted.

Similar hunting seasons are expected in some Midwestern states if the national delisting survives the anticipated court challenges, and wildlife groups contend that hunting seasons will limit wolves' ability to repopulate other parts of the country.

Randy Johnson, a large carnivore specialist for Wisconsin's Department of Natural Resources, told Wisconsin Public Radio this month that if wolf management fell back to the state, it would use all of the tools available to find a balance "between a healthy and sustainable wolf population, but also addressing those social concerns and livestock concerns when and where needed."

READ MORE


Contribute to RSN

Update My Monthly Donation







Friday, October 30, 2020

RSN: Stephen Eric Bronner | A Short History of the Lesser Evil

 






 

Reader Supported News
30 October 20


48 Hours to Go, Help With This Fundraiser!

We have 48 hours to go in October and we are really hurting for basic funding. Slow down, pull over and help out.

It really matters.

Marc Ash
Founder, Reader Supported News

Sure, I'll make a donation!


Update My Monthly Donation

If you would prefer to send a check:
Reader Supported News
PO Box 2043
Citrus Hts, CA 95611




 

Reader Supported News
29 October 20

It's Live on the HomePage Now:
Reader Supported News


AT THIS POINT A DISASTER ON FUNDING FOR OCTOBER - Regardless of what we want, what we have is a funding disaster. This is the worst fundraiser of the year so far, and one of the worst ever. As always the number of people visiting the site is exponentially greater than the number of people donating. The financial distress caused by that is easy to forecast. If we are to continue we must have the support of those we serve. / Marc Ash, Founder Reader Supported News

Sure, I'll make a donation!

RSN: Stephen Eric Bronner | A Short History of the Lesser Evil
Attendees await former vice president Joe Biden at a campaign event at Texas Southern University in Houston, March 2, 2020. (photo: Tamir Kalifa/The New York Times)
Stephen Eric Bronner, Reader Supported News
Bronner writes: "Trump: first against Hillary Clinton in 2016, and now against Joseph Biden - another bitter pill for the left to swallow. There are enough who throw up their hands in frustration."

 There are enough who throw up their hands in frustration. Trump the neo-fascist vs. Biden the slightly-left-of-mainstream Democrat. The former vice president epitomizes the lesser of the evils. Biden’s domestic policies are not exactly robust, though they’re radically more egalitarian than those of the president, and he is indeed taking the left wing of the party for granted; the “undecided” voter is his target; and explicit calls for class politics are off-limits. Trump’s xenophobic vision of “America First” has offended Western allies and withdrawn the United States from international treaties pertaining to climate change and Iran, while sabotaging the UN and its agencies such as UNWRA, UNESCO, and others. As for Biden, his foreign policy mistakes were egregious even before he offered support for the invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq. Many will have their doubts when they cast their ballots.

Whether Trump beats Biden or not, moreover, the president’s semi-fascist base, between 35 and 40% of the country, is not going away. Rank careerists, cynical wise guys, and identity politicians in the Democratic Party who took industrial workers and the left for granted in 2016 paved the way for Trump’s electoral triumph – and the trauma is still with us. But those who did not vote or threw away their vote on a third party, rather than vote for Hillary Clinton, the “lesser evil,” didn’t help matters either.

Our “genius” president, as Trump calls himself, won the decisive states in the 2016 election by fewer votes than those given to the Green Party candidate, Jill Stein. Of course, she never stood a chance of winning anything except admiration from the pure of heart, the self-righteous, and the self-centered, who could not possibly vote for the lesser of the two evils – as if elections were somehow created for those listening to the Sermon on the Mount.

There has never been an American election not based on the “lesser of the two evils.” Even the presidential campaigns of Franklin Delano Roosevelt were not for the pure of heart. Comparing him with either Hillary or Biden (let alone Eleanor with Melania) would be absurd. But FDR’s politics was not without flaws. He left Jim Crow basically untouched, tempered the more radical demands of strikers in Flint and elsewhere, and twisted traditional norms by running for four terms and trying to “pack” a reactionary Supreme Court (which might yet prove necessary should the Democrats win the presidency and the Senate in 2020). Regarding foreign policy, moreover, he privileged dictators over popular movements in Latin America, created an Office of Naval Intelligence, provoked Hitler with his lend-lease policies, placed a stultifying embargo on Japan, supported secret attacks on Japanese forces, and provoked Pearl Harbor.

All of this occurred while much of the pacifist and radical left embraced the slogan “Never Again War!” Roosevelt was also blamed for failing to end the Great Depression of 1929 by communists and other radicals who demanded “more” government intervention in the economy. Other than the fringes, however, those further to the left had the sense to vote for him. Had Roosevelt lost those elections, the New Deal would never have been passed, and the welfare state would have remained an object of opprobrium. What’s more, while the result might not have been as bad as the Nazi takeover envisioned in Phillip Roth’s Plot Against America, it would have been bad enough; Roosevelt’s defeat would surely have cost England the war.

There were far louder cries on the far left of “sell-out” during the presidential campaign between two former vice-presidents in 1968: Richard Nixon vs. Hubert Humphrey. That remains a particularly sensitive topic for my generation. Everyone despised Nixon, including his former boss, President Dwight D. Eisenhower. That was perhaps even more the case with Nixon’s now-disgraced and forgotten vice president, Spiro Agnew, the former Governor of Maryland, whose gangster-like greed and sheer stupidity somehow anticipate Trump. In any event, Nixon was completely upfront about his agenda. He called for increased military intervention with respect to the Vietnam War, which later resulted in the genocidal bombing of Cambodia. Nixon also employed the “Southern Strategy” to full effect by using racist tropes and opposing the civil rights movement. With the staunch assistance of Agnew, moreover, Nixon appealed to the “silent majority” and supported attacks on intellectuals and experts (let alone anti-war critics) as “nattering nabobs of negativity.” Indeed, this should all sound very familiar.

Vice President Hubert Humphrey was considered a war criminal by most of the left. He couldn’t rid himself of the stench emanating from his boss’s genocidal Vietnam policies. But he was clearly a better man than Nixon, who engaged in the crudest form of red-baiting in his defeat of Helen Gahagan Douglas – calling her “pink right down to her underwear” – in the California senatorial campaign of 1950. Humphrey bravely opposed the segregationist “Dixiecrats” at the Democratic Convention of 1948. A staunch supporter of civil liberties and civil rights, he was a critic of McCarthyism and an intrepid advocate of the “great society” programs, which today mark the flip side of President Lyndon B. Johnson’s legacy.

Humphrey was a reasonable and intelligent man who lacked the anti-intellectual biases and bigotry of his opponent. The great majority of the black community was behind him. Supporting Humphrey should have created no problem at all. And yet…. A leader in the fight for nuclear disarmament, there was simply no excusing his complicity in the Vietnam debacle, whatever his campaign promises to get the US out, just as there was no excuse for Hillary or Biden’s support of the Iraq war. Then too, the excitement created by Bobby Kennedy’s primary campaign against Johnson for the Democratic presidential nomination in 1968 was matched by the profound grief generated by his assassination, and this was only enhanced by memories of his brother, JFK, and Martin Luther King, Jr. There were also the massive demonstrations in Washington DC, and the “days of rage” when “the whole world was watching” and Senator Abe Ribicoff angrily accused the Democratic mayor Richard Daley of using “Gestapo tactics in the streets of Chicago.”

In short, it was understandable why so many radicals and young people chose not to vote for Humphrey and the Democrats; I was one of them. But I was wrong. Nixon defeated Humphrey by less than 1% (though the crook comfortably won the electoral college) – and the Cambodian and Vietnamese people paid the price. Would it have been different had Humphrey won? I don’t know. Perhaps it would have been – but that “perhaps” was good enough reason to roll the dice and vote for the lesser evil. It would not have cost me a thing except my sense of moral superiority.

Sectarianism has always had a blind spot when it comes to drawing distinctions between political opponents and policies; it has always been either my way, my politics straight down the line, or the highway. The judgment is always self-referential: how do candidates relate to my needs? Never is it a matter of how one candidate or the other might make a difference for the disenfranchised and exploited. Once policy differences are taken into account, of course, the stakes change. Judgments are no longer simply subjective or narrowly moral. There is a practical responsibility to the polity at stake.

That is especially true in the United States with its “exceptional” electoral system. Even the briefest glance at The Federalist Papers (especially numbers #10 and #51) shows that the system has been rigged against “the great beast” of the poor from the start. Its insistence on coalitions of self-interested “factions” rather than ideological parties, its winner-take-all elections, its undemocratic electoral college, and its voting restrictions create obvious disincentives for any third party. Yet, it can disrupt: Governor George W. Bush won the presidential election of 2000 by taking Florida with less than 600 votes while Ralph Nader, the third party candidate, convinced just under 100,000 (mostly leftists) to cast their ballots for him. Might this have made a difference for the 37 million refugees generated by the Iraq War? Perhaps. Anyway, the lesson is clear: vote for the lesser of the two evils while working for the aims of a radical social movement.

The old slogan from the 1960s – “Don’t vote! It only encourages them!” – was silly even then. “They” need no further encouragement, and Republican strategy is again one of suppressing the vote. In addition, radical social movements tend to benefit from having a more liberal regime in power, while the opposite is true for reactionary movements and more conservative administrations. Each mass-based social movement can exert pressure on its ideologically more acceptable political party. That was brilliantly shown by the Tea Party and, to a somewhat lesser extent, by Occupy Wall Street, and boldly by the followers of Bernie Sanders.

Everyone surely knows the damage Trump has done: to the courts, to the state department, to the intelligence agencies, to the welfare state, to foreign policy from the Levant to Iran, to US relations with Western Europe, to environmental politics, to civil liberties and voting rights, to immigrants, to enlightened political discourse, to race relations, to respect for science and intellectuals, to the quest for economic equality, to civic decency, and to ... Everyone also knows that Joe Biden, whatever his faults, is not “really” the same as Donald Trump. He is not a pathological liar, and he knows the difference between legitimate reporting and “fake news.”

Differences vanish only with the belief that elections are made for saints: Forget the casuistry, and the anger, and the disappointment, and the frustration, and the pseudo-dialectical convolutions. Kant was right in insisting that “he who wills the end wills the means thereto.” If you want Trump out, you need to vote for Biden. It’s as simple as that. And such is the case even in the states that Democrats are sure to win: the size of the electoral victory or defeat can carry symbolic value, especially when the threat of contesting the election is real.

Again, there is no need to surrender the fight for transformative political goals. That is what social movements are for. They can bring to bear the need for greater economic equality, and “more” welfare programs than what Biden might have in mind. They can also raise the demand for radical political change: abolishing the electoral college, setting term limits for judges, expanding voting rights, altering the tax code, taxing the church, and the like. Obviously many such demands are “unrealistic,” but they deserve being raised. None of this has anything to do with voting for the lesser of the two evils, and if this seems contradictory to dogmatists and sectarians, it isn’t. That approach is still the only meaningful path forward.



Stephen Eric Bronner is Board of Governors Distinguished Professor Emeritus of Political Science at Rutgers University and Co-Director of the International Council for Diplomacy and Dialogue. His most recent work is The Sovereign (Routledge).

Reader Supported News is the Publication of Origin for this work. Permission to republish is freely granted with credit and a link back to Reader Supported News.

READ MORE


Contribute to RSN

Update My Monthly Donation









This Weekend in Politics, Bulletin 441.

                                                                               LOTS OF POSTS IGNORED BY BLOGGER..... OR REMOVED ON THEIR WHI...