Showing posts with label INFANT MORTALITY. Show all posts
Showing posts with label INFANT MORTALITY. Show all posts

Friday, June 28, 2024

Infant mortality spiked in Texas after abortion ban, study reveals

 


PBS NewsHour

4.08M subscribers


A new study focused on Texas looks at the year after its law banning all abortions after six weeks with no exceptions for rape, incest or fetal abnormalities. The research found a significant increase in infant deaths, much higher than the rest of the country. Amna Nawaz discussed more with one of the authors of the study, Suzanne Bell of the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health. Stream your PBS favorites with the PBS app: https://to.pbs.org/2Jb8twG Find more from PBS NewsHour at https://www.pbs.org/newshour Subscribe to our YouTube channel: https://bit.ly/2HfsCD6 Follow us: TikTok:   / pbsnews   Twitter:   / newshour   Instagram:   / newshour   Facebook: http://www.pbs.org/newshour Subscribe: PBS NewsHour podcasts: https://www.pbs.org/newshour/podcasts Newsletters: https://www.pbs.org/newshour/subscribe

Thursday, November 9, 2023

March of Dimes: Infant mortality rate on the rise

 
March of Dimes.


Four news headlines about infant mortality rates
 


Last week, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) released provisional data showing the largest percentage increase in infant mortality in more than two decades, revealing 20,538 infant deaths reported in 2022, an increase of 3% from the previous year. This is noteworthy as infant mortality has steadily decreased over the last several years.

While infant mortality rates significantly increased overall to 5.6 per 1,000 live births, rates among American Indian/Alaskan Native and Black babies are 2.3 times higher than rates among White and Hispanic babies, underscoring the persistent disparities that continue to the widen the health equity gap.
 
 
March of Dimes President and CEO Dr. Elizabeth Cherot shares, “It’s disappointing to see such a significant increase in infant deaths after the country has witnessed a steady decline over the last 10 years. As we look ahead to the release of our 2023 March of Dimes Report Card on the state of maternal and infant health later this month, we had been encouraged by the fact that more babies were surviving in the U.S. With today's news, we're disheartened to see that we're now trending in the wrong direction.”

She continued, “What's more, the data shows some of the causes of infant death are attributed to preterm birth as well as maternal complications and bacterial sepsis, which accounted for 9% and 14% of deaths respectively. March of Dimes believes maternal and infant health is fundamental to the health of our society and calls on all those affected and concerned by this crisis—including advocates and corporate partners—to join us to ensure every mom and baby get the best possible start.” Read the full statement here.

 
Together, we can bridge the health equity gap, support families, and improve health outcomes for moms and babies.

Sincerely,

March of Dimes

P.S. On November 16, we’ll release our 2023 March of Dimes Report Card for more information about the state of maternal and infant health at www.marchofdimes.org/report-card.
 
 
March of DImes
 
 
Facebook   Twitter   LinkedIn   YouTube  












Instagram
   Tik Tok   Threads
 
March of Dimes
1550 Crystal Dr., Ste. 1300
Arlington, VA 22202

Thursday, February 17, 2022

RSN: FOCUS: Robert Reich | Could You Possibly Invent a More Expensive and Less Effective Healthcare System Than What We Have in the US?

 


 

Reader Supported News
17 February 22

Live on the homepage now!
Reader Supported News

URGENT AND IMMEDIATE APPEAL FOR DONATIONS — It is — very — important to get moving on donations, right here right now. Yes we do need the money. Yes some people have helped. But we have to have a good month, whatever it takes. As of right now it’s not happening. With urgency.
Marc Ash • Founder, Reader Supported News

Sure, I'll make a donation!

 

Professor Robert Reich is testifying today before a House committee that's considering the future of healthcare in America. (photo: Getty)
FOCUS: Robert Reich | Could You Possibly Invent a More Expensive and Less Effective Healthcare System Than What We Have in the US?
Robert Reich, Robert Reich's Blog
Reich writes: "American spending on healthcare per person is more than twice the average in the world's other thirty-five advanced nations. Yet the United States ranks near the bottom among advanced nations for life span and infant mortality."

No. Which is what I'm telling Congress today.

For many years, my right ankle has been losing cartilage that keeps my ankle bones from scraping up against each other. The result: increasing inflammation and pain. An orthopedic surgeon suggested replacing the ankle with an artificial one, but the procedure is costly, takes months to heal, and requires lots of physical therapy. So I’ve taken a different route. I cut way back on sugar, began an exercise program aimed at strengthening the muscles around my ankle, and lost twenty pounds. Now, six months later, the ankle pain is almost gone.

I share this with you because I’m testifying today before a House committee that’s considering the future of healthcare in America.

The fact is, we have too many high-priced specialists who know how to do a few complicated and costly things such as replacing a bum ankle, and too few generalists who know enough about the whole body that they’re able to avoid the complicated and costly things. The big money is in the complicated things, so that’s where the talent goes and what hospitals aim for. And if you can pay for it, great. The complicated stuff is what America excels at.

But we’re terrible at the uncomplicated things — not just my cutting back on sugar, exercising, and keeping the weight down, but making sure everyone gets regular checkups from general practitioners who are trained to prevent serious illnesses. The terrible tolls of diabetes, heart disease, and some cancers, for example, are preventable if caught in time.

Even before the pandemic, the typical American family was spending more than $6,000 a year on health insurance premiums. Add in copayments and deductibles that doctors, hospitals, and drug companies also charge, and that sum rises to $6,400. Add in typical out-of-pocket expenses for pharmaceuticals, and it’s at least $6,800. That’s not all, because some of the taxes the typical family pays are for health insurance, too — for Medicare and Medicaid and the Affordable Care Act. Add them in, and the typical household pays $8,975 a year for health insurance. This number doesn’t include what typical workers’ employers spend on their health insurance – which might otherwise go to their wages.

American spending on healthcare per person is more than twice the average in the world’s other thirty-five advanced nations. Yet the United States ranks near the bottom among advanced nations for life span and infant mortality. Americans are sicker, our lives are shorter, and we have more chronic illnesses. Canadians, for example, can expect to live on average almost four and a half years longer than Americans, even though health care spending per person is only about half as high as in the U.S.

Healthcare is so expensive that many Americans put off seeing a doctor until their health has seriously deteriorated. Even with the Affordable Care Act, some 30 million Americans have no health insurance coverage at all.

Not only do too many dollars go to super-specialists and too few to preventive generalists, but the administrative costs involved in private for-profit insurance are humongous. About a third of what the typical American pays for health insurance goes to the people who oversee billing and collections. And then of course there are marketing and advertising expenses, and the profits that go to shareholders or private-equity managers.

Finally, if the pandemic taught us anything, it’s that we need to decouple health insurance from employment. Losing a job shouldn’t mean the loss of a family’s lifeline to healthcare.

The Affordable Care Act was a good start at reform, but today I’m urging Congress to replace private for-profit health insurance with Medicare for all. This would lead to far lower total costs — including premiums, co-payments, deductibles, and taxes — and it would cover all Americans. People could keep their same doctor or other health-care provider, and could buy private insurance to supplement it — just as some people now buy private insurance to supplement Medicare and Social Security. But as Medicare and Social Security have demonstrated, we shouldn’t need to pay private for-profit insurers boatloads of money to get the insurance we need.

I have no illusions this will happen soon. But the road we’re now on is unsustainable — economically, politically, and socially. Eventually, we’re going to have some version of Medicare for All (and hats off to members of Congress who are leading the way, such as Representatives Pramila Jayapal, Debbie Dingel, and Ro Khanna). The question is how much unnecessary cost and hardship must we bear before we do?

In the meantime, I hope you’ll join me for tomorrow’s second class on Wealth and Poverty — right here on this page.


READ MORE

 

Contribute to RSN

Follow us on facebook and twitter!

Update My Monthly Donation

PO Box 2043 / Citrus Heights, CA 95611






Cultural capital of the world

                                                                                                                                            ...