LOTS OF POSTS IGNORED BY BLOGGER.....

OR REMOVED ON THEIR WHIM!

ALL POSTS ARE AVAILABLE ON

MIDDLEBORO REVIEW AND SO ON

BLOGGER DOESN'T LIKE TRUTH OR FACTS!

BLOGGER DOESN'T LIKE FUND RAISERS AND DELETES

POSTS THAT INCLUDE FUNDRAISING THAT 'VIOLATES THEIR

UNDEFINED COMMUNITY STANDARDS SO ALL 'FUND RAISING'

IS DELETED - CONTRIBUTE AS YOU ARE INCLINED TO SUPPORT

IMPORTANT ISSUES! THESE ARE NOT SOLICITATIONS

Watch now

Did Al-Qaeda Win? Graeme Wood on 25 Years of American Foreign Policy Errors

Meidas Defense: Graeme Wood on Al-Qaeda’s Grand Fallacy, Iran’s Calculus, and Washington’s National Security Blunders

Joe Plenzler, MeidasTouch Network, and Valor Media Network Sep 11

By Joe Plenzler, Meidas Defense

Host: Joe Plenzler

Guest: Graeme Wood (The Atlantic)

EPISODE OVERVIEW

For nearly twenty-five years, American foreign policy has operated under a single foundational premise: that Osama bin Laden deliberately drew the United States into a prolonged ground war in Afghanistan to bleed our military and economy dry on an “anvil” of endless occupation.

What if our fundamental premise about Al-Qaeda’s grand strategy was wrong from day one?

In this episode of Meidas Defense, host Joe Plenzler sits down with Graeme Wood, staff writer at The Atlantic and author of Way of the Strangers: Encounters with the Islamic State, to re-examine the true legacy of 9/11. Drawing from captured documents in Abbottabad and decades of boots-on-the-ground reporting, Graeme reveals how bin Laden actually expected the American public to rise up and withdraw from the Middle East—not stay and occupy it.

Joe and Graeme unpack how Washington repeatedly mistook its own institutional blunders for the tactical genius of its enemies, the stark operational contrast between Al-Qaeda and Iran’s IRGC, and whether “Al-Qaeda Core” is effectively a defunct podcast operating out of Iranian safe houses—or still a lethal threat to the West.

KEY TAKEAWAYS & TIMESTAMPS

• [00:00] – Intro & The 9/11 Myth
  Joe Plenzler sets the stage: Did bin Laden actually plan to trap America in Afghanistan, or did Washington rewrite history after its own strategic missteps?

• [02:15] – The Abbottabad Revelations: Bin Laden’s Actual Intent
  Graeme Wood breaks down the captured bin Laden papers, explaining why bin Laden expected an anti-war movement to collapse the U.S. government—and how he pivoted only after the invasion occurred.

• [05:03] – “Bozo Cutouts” vs. Real Threat: Why Iran Exercises Restraint
  Comparing terrorist networks to state actors: How the IRGC demonstrates a sophisticated understanding of American public opinion by avoiding high-visibility homeland strikes that would trigger full-scale war.

• [08:12] – “Strategic Morons” & The Bureaucratic Mismatch
  Why bin Laden ruined his own greatest asset (Taliban-controlled Afghanistan) and how the U.S. military attempted to impose hyper-bureaucratic warfare on tribal societies.

• [10:45] – Defunct Has-Beens vs. Peripheral Threat
  Is Al-Qaeda Core dead? Analyzing scholars Thomas Hegghammer and Cole Bunzel’s theory that Al-Qaeda’s central leadership is reduced to issuing podcasts from safehouses, while regional affiliates like Al-Shabaab and JNAM hold real power.

• [13:20] – The Jihadist Split: Governance vs. Apocalyptic Terror
  Comparing Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi’s self-destructive ISIS model with former Al-Qaeda commander Ahmad al-Sharaa in Syria, who renounced global jihadism to seek political power and Western diplomatic recognition.

• [16:40] – Bearing Responsibility: Stop Making the Enemy 12 Feet Tall
  Graeme’s final message on the anniversary of 9/11: Why Americans must take responsibility for their own policy mistakes rather than building adversaries up into diabolical geniuses.

  
  

NOTABLE QUOTES FROM GRAEME WOOD

“What bin Laden was actually hoping would happen was a popular uprising in the United States against the government that would cause America to leave the Middle East—not go to Southwest Asia and get bogged down.”

“One of the analytical failings we’ve had is succumbing to the temptation to see our errors as evidence of their genius. It’s more like they were strategic morons, and we often were, too.”

“If you wanted to join Al-Qaeda Core right now, you wouldn’t even know where to go. You wouldn’t know who to write to... There’s just not a lot of evidence right now that they are still a going operation, as opposed to just a defunct podcast.”

“We persuaded ourselves that we were fighting diabolical geniuses when in fact we ended up fighting a bunch of nincompoops... Which means that the many missteps that we had were really our own.”

RESOURCES & ARTICLES MENTIONED

• Graeme Wood’s Article: “Did al-Qaeda Succeed?” (The Atlantic)

• Book Recommendation: The Bin Laden Papers by Nellie Lahoud

• Scholarly Perspectives: Works by Thomas Hegghammer (Oxford) and Cole Bunzel (University of Texas at Austin)

• Book Mention: Armed Humanitarians by Nathan Hodge

JOIN THE CONVERSATION

What do you think of Graeme Wood’s analysis? Did America’s strategic errors in the War on Terror stem from overestimating Al-Qaeda’s genius? Drop your thoughts in the comments below!

Meidas+ is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support our work, and to support initiatives like Meidas Defense, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.

A guest post by Joe Plenzler Unapologetic Patriot. 🇺🇸 Loyal to America, always, & to our leaders when they deserve it. 🪖Decorated Marine Corps combat veteran. 🦅Eagle Scout. Mountaineer. Trekker. ☠️GenX punk☠️. World's Ok-est guitar player. Sic Semper Tyrannis. 🏴‍☠️

A guest post by Valor Media Network