Showing posts with label WATERGATE. Show all posts
Showing posts with label WATERGATE. Show all posts

Tuesday, May 26, 2026

Trump’s Scandals Have No Precedent

                                                                                                                                                                  

   LOTS OF POSTS IGNORED BY BLOGGER.....

OR REMOVED ON THEIR WHIM!

ALL POSTS ARE AVAILABLE ON

MIDDLEBORO REVIEW AND SO ON

BLOGGER DOESN'T LIKE TRUTH OR FACTS!

BLOGGER DOESN'T LIKE FUND RAISERS AND DELETES

POSTS THAT INCLUDE FUNDRAISING THAT 'VIOLATES THEIR

UNDEFINED COMMUNITY STANDARDS SO ALL 'FUND RAISING'

IS DELETED - CONTRIBUTE AS YOU ARE INCLINED TO SUPPORT

IMPORTANT ISSUES! THESE ARE NOT SOLICITATIONS 


Trump’s Scandals Have No Precedent

The Trump administration corruption is breathtaking in scale and volume


By Max from UNFTR.com

U.S. President Donald Trump and his son Donald Trump Jr. arrive at the White House in Washington, D.C., U.S., May 3, 2026. REUTERS/Annabelle Gordon

In just the past couple of weeks, there have been three separate instances of such unfathomable corruption that any other normal presidency wouldn’t have survived a single one of them. Let alone all three.

Confirmed insider trading — not by someone in the administration, but by the sitting president of the United States. A literal slush fund to help criminals who are allied with the administration. And a finance scheme so monumental it has the potential to set up Donald Trump and his family as one of the wealthiest dynasties in the world.

The level of corruption on display right now is so profound that historians will spend decades writing books about this period. The problem is we’re living in it in real time, which means we’ve lost our sense of scale. Thus, I think it’s helpful to remind ourselves what a real scandal looks like. What it used to take to bring down an administration. And how far we have fallen from that standard.


Teapot Dome

It’s the 1920s. Warren G. Harding is president and is about to be hit by a scandal so significant that for the better part of a century it was considered the single greatest act of government corruption in American history. Here’s how it went down.

The U.S. government had set aside oil reserves in California and Wyoming specifically for the U.S. Navy — strategic petroleum holdings that were not for sale, not for lease, not for the private market. In Wyoming, one of those reserves sat beneath a rock formation that looked vaguely like a teapot.

A man named Albert Fall was Harding’s Secretary of the Interior and in 1921 he maneuvered to have oversight of those naval reserves transferred from the Navy Department to his own Interior Department. Then he quietly leased the Teapot Dome reserve to oil tycoon Harry Sinclair and the Elk Hills reserve in California to Edward Doheny — without competitive bidding, public disclosure or congressional approval. In exchange, Fall received up to $400,000 in bribes — cash delivered in a black bag, Liberty bonds, livestock for his New Mexico ranch.

When Senate investigators started pulling threads in 1924, the whole thing unraveled. Fall resigned. The leases were canceled by the Supreme Court, which declared them fraudulent and called Fall a “faithless public officer.” Criminal trials followed and Fall was convicted of bribery — becoming the first sitting cabinet member in American history to go to prison for crimes committed in office.

Harding died before the full scope of the scandal was known, spared the final reckoning.

The legacy: Teapot Dome produced a landmark Supreme Court ruling affirming Congress’s subpoena power in investigations. It defined the outer boundary of executive corruption for a generation. Its name became shorthand for what a cabinet official selling public assets for private gain looked like.

Watergate

Fifty years later, we got something even bigger and this time the guy at the top caught the heat.

June 17, 1972. Five men are arrested inside the Democratic National Committee headquarters at the Watergate complex in Washington, D.C. They’re there to photograph documents and plant listening devices. They work — directly or indirectly — for the Committee to Re-Elect the President. Richard Nixon’s committee.

The burglary itself was comically unnecessary. Nixon was ahead in the polls and likely to win in a landslide. But paranoia is its own logic and the cover-up that followed the arrest was where Nixon destroyed himself.

Hush money was paid to the burglars. FBI investigations were obstructed. Nixon’s own White House counsel John Dean told him directly that there was a “cancer on the presidency.” And all of it was recorded — on Nixon’s own secret taping system — including the smoking gun conversation in which Nixon ordered the CIA to obstruct the FBI’s investigation. That tape, revealed two years after the break-in, ended his presidency.

Photo: Demonstrators in front of the White House calling for Nixon’s impeachment.

Nixon resigned on August 9, 1974. The only American president in history to do so, prompting Gerald Ford to declare, “Our long national nightmare is over.”

But here’s the corollary to our current situation. Nixon didn’t just authorize a break-in. His administration was a catalogue of abuses: illegal use of military force, domestic spying, outright bribery, campaign contributions laundered through shell companies, the weaponization of the IRS against political enemies. And in one specific act of executive overreach — withholding congressionally appropriated funds for programs he opposed, a practice called impoundment — Nixon forced Congress to pass a law specifically to stop him.

The Congressional Budget and Impoundment Control Act of 1974. It passed with overwhelming bipartisan support, over Nixon’s veto. It established the Congressional Budget Office and required congressional approval before any president could rescind appropriated funds. This matters greatly today because Russell Vought—perhaps the most capable and dangerous person in this entire administration—is the one who orchestrated the theft of government funding to almost every agency in 2025, essentially flouting the Impoundment Act.

This is a very, very big deal. In fact, before we move on to another huge scandal in our little history lesson, let’s hang here for a second

Vought has testified that Congress can set the appropriations amount but cannot direct funds. That’s one interpretation, but it’s completely false. But because we live with the Roberts Supreme Court, this isn’t going to be considered. This is Russell Vought’s modus operandi and why he’s so dangerous. He knows with control of all three branches he can just break norms, protocols and laws to fuel his white Christian nationalist agenda. This is clearly the guy in the president’s ear because Donald Trump is too inept and distracted to pull this stuff off. And Vought is moving quickly and deliberately to tear as much down as he can. USAID, the departments of Education, Interior, Energy, EPA… all of these cuts and kneecapping of authority is this guy’s design and in the first year he did it all by ignoring the biggest thing that came out of the Nixon administration scandals.

Back to Nixon. In the end Watergate produced more good-government reforms than any single event in American history. The War Powers Act. The Foreign Corrupt Practices Act. The Inspector General Act. Civil service protections. Campaign finance reform. And Impoundment. And of course, it gave us the suffix. Every scandal since has been appended with “-gate” to signal the depth of the wrongdoing. Monicagate. Deflategate. The suffix is so ubiquitous we’ve almost forgotten why it exists.

Iran-Contra

Let’s move ahead to the go-go 1980s and a scandal that revealed something even more troubling than personal corruption: a secret government operating inside the official one. Also chillingly familiar in today’s world.

In the early to mid-1980s, Congress passed a series of amendments referred to as the Boland Amendments to curtail US involvement in Nicaragua. They were specifically designed to prohibit U.S. government funding of the Contras, the anti-Sandinista rebels in Nicaragua. The Reagan administration disagreed with this law. So rather than work through democratic channels to change it, senior officials decided to simply ignore it.

Photo: Oliver North testifying on the Iran Contra affair

Under the scheme, U.S. officials would sell arms to Iran — which was under an arms embargo, and which had taken American hostages — and use the proceeds to secretly fund the Contras. The operation was run out of the National Security Council by a Marine lieutenant colonel named Oliver North, who kept meticulous notebooks documenting every step of the scheme. When the Lebanese magazine Ash-Shiraa broke the story in November 1986, the whole covert architecture collapsed into public view.

Reagan went on national television and insisted the U.S. did not trade arms for hostages. (Just like Bill Clinton did not have sexual relations with that woman. Like Trump barely knew Jeffrey Epstein). Anyway, four months later, he went back on national television and said that yes, in fact, it did. “What began as a strategic opening to Iran deteriorated, in its implementation, into trading arms for hostages.” His approval rating suffered the largest single-month drop of any American president in history — from 67% to 46%.

This was back when presidents cared about approval ratings.

The fallout: Reagan appointed the Tower Commission to investigate. Independent counsel Lawrence Walsh spent nearly seven years on the case. He secured a dozen indictments, eight convictions or guilty pleas. Among the convictions were Oliver North and National Security Advisor John Poindexter. Secretary of Defense Caspar Weinberger was indicted. Most convictions were later vacated on appeal, or pardoned by George H.W. Bush in his final days in office — a pardon Walsh suggested was partly designed to prevent Bush himself from being implicated.

In the end, no one went to prison. But the scandal cracked something open about how American foreign policy actually worked — covert operations, off-the-books funding, a shadow government running foreign wars without congressional knowledge. The public’s trust in the presidency, already damaged by Vietnam and Watergate, dropped another floor.

The legacy: Iran-Contra revealed that the guardrails of democratic oversight could be routed around if the executive was determined enough.


Insider Trading

The aforementioned scandals were legitimately a big deal. Historic ones we study in school. Now let’s talk about what has happened in a matter of weeks in the Trump administration to give you an idea of the speed, the scale, and the brazenness of what is unfolding.

In mid-May, Trump filed a mandatory ethics disclosure covering his stock trades for the first quarter of 2026 — January through March. What was in it is extraordinary. Over 3,700 individual stock transactions with a total value of somewhere between $220 million and $750 million. More than 30 individual purchases worth $1 million or more apiece in a single quarter.

The companies: Nvidia, Microsoft, Apple, Amazon, Broadcom, Goldman Sachs, Alphabet, AMD, Intel, Micron. And here’s where it gets interesting. The executives of nearly all those companies accompanied Trump on his trip to Beijing the week before the disclosures came out. The president was on Air Force One with the CEOs of the companies he had just bought millions of dollars of stock in.

It gets worse. Trump toured a Thermo Fisher Scientific manufacturing facility and on the same day he purchased tens of thousands of dollars in Thermo Fisher stock. Trump gave a speech calling Apple “a great company” and praising Tim Cook by name. Same day: he purchased hundreds of thousands of dollars in Apple stock. Trump gave a Fox News interview in which he described Micron Technology as “one of the hottest companies.” One day later: he purchased Micron stock. Trump gave a speech in Georgia and told the audience — directly, on camera — to “go out and buy a Dell computer.” Nine days later: he purchased millions of dollars in Dell stock.

Let’s be precise about the structure here: the president of the United States has a trust that holds his assets. That trust is managed not by an independent blind trustee — as every ethics norm and presidential tradition requires — but by his son, Donald Trump Jr. There is no legal or practical barrier preventing Trump from communicating with Trump Jr. about what to buy and when.

Now layer in the prediction markets. Bubblemaps, a data analytics firm, identified nine anonymous accounts on Polymarket and Kalshi — the betting platforms — that placed more than 80 bets on U.S. military actions: the timing of bombardments, ceasefire announcements, geopolitical events. Their win rate was 98%. Total winnings: over $2.4 million. One account called “Magamyman” made $553,000 betting on the death of Iranian Supreme Leader Khamenei. An active duty Army Master Sergeant was indicted in April for using a VPN to place a $34,000 bet on the capture of Nicolas Maduro — a bet that paid out $400,000. The White House itself sent a memo to staff in March reminding them that using nonpublic government information to bet on prediction markets is a federal crime. They sent the memo because it was already happening.

Unsurprisingly, Donald Trump Jr. is an investor in Polymarket through his venture capital firm, 1789 Capital.

No charges have (yet) been filed. Nothing has been proven in a court of law. But remember, in the Teapot Dome scandal it took two years of Senate investigation just to establish that Albert Fall had accepted a bribe. The mechanics of accountability move slowly. But the pattern here is not subtle. The president buys stock. The president makes a public statement that moves that stock. The president profits. Over and over and over again, more than 3,700 times in ninety days.

But wait, there’s more.

Slush Fund

On the same day that the stock trading disclosures were generating headlines, the Trump Justice Department quietly announced something else. Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche — who, before taking that job, was Donald Trump’s personal defense attorney — unveiled what they called the Anti-Weaponization Fund totaling $1.776 billion to be drawn from the Treasury Department’s Judgment Fund and for the stated purpose of compensating people who claim they were unfairly targeted by the Biden administration’s Justice Department.

Let’s walk through how this money was created, because the mechanism is as important as the amount.

Trump filed a $10 billion lawsuit against the IRS — his own IRS, the one that reports to his own Treasury Secretary — over the leak of his personal tax returns. A federal judge had already cast doubt on the basic legality of a sitting president suing a department he controls. But before any ruling came down, the Justice Department settled the case. Against itself. The $10 billion suit became a $1.776 billion fund — controlled entirely by Blanche, Trump’s former personal attorney — to pay out Trump’s allies. Payable by the Treasury. Also his.”

Rep. Jamie Raskin did not mince words: “No president can concoct a fake case for $10 billion in damages against the government so he can be plaintiff and defendant and then ‘settle’ his bogus case against himself as a judge. This case is nothing but a racket.”

Senator Ron Wyden called it “the most brazen theft and abuse of taxpayer dollars by any president in American history.”

But here’s where it gets worse. The money doesn’t go to Trump directly — at least not yet. It goes into a fund controlled by a five-member commission. Those five members are hand-picked by Todd Blanche. The recipients of the payouts will not be made public nor will the amounts apparently. The process is entirely internal to an administration that has already demonstrated it will use every lever of government for political purposes.

And who are the beneficiaries? The roughly 1,600 people charged over the January 6 attack on the Capitol. Proud Boys. Militia members. Trump allies who claim they were “weaponized” against. Trump’s inner circle. Actually, we don’t really know, do we?

And what happened when this was announced? The Treasury’s own general counsel Brian Morrissey, a former clerk for Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas, resigned. A man who worked for Clarence Thomas decided even this was a bridge too far.

Crypto Grift

Last year we connected the dots on the Trump Family’s World Liberty Financial stablecoin gambit that sets the family up to be one of the wealthiest families on the planet. For this to happen, three distinct bills would have to clear Congress. The GENIUS Act, The CLARITY Act and the Anti-CBDC Surveillance Act. Together these bills would allow the Trump family to possess one of the only authorized mechanisms to buy U.S. Treasuries on the blockchain.

The GENIUS Act, which in and of itself is not a bad piece of legislation, is already law. But it’s the next two that in tandem weaponize the GENIUS Act and set the family up for life.

Last week the CLARITY Act cleared the an important milestone being passed by the Senate Banking Committee on May 14th in a 15-9 vote. Every Republican voted yes. Two Democrats crossed over. No Democratic amendments were adopted — not on ethics, not on anti-money laundering, not on consumer protection. All rejected or ruled out of order by Senator Tim Scott who chairs the committee.

Here is what this bill does and who it benefits. The Trump family, through an entity called World Liberty Financial, issues a stablecoin called USD1. They reportedly pocketed $57 million on the launch alone and have secured over $2 billion in institutional deals, including one with an Abu Dhabi sovereign wealth fund. The CLARITY Act creates the regulatory framework that legitimizes their coin, protects their market position, and hands oversight of the entire crypto industry to the CFTC — a smaller, more industry-friendly regulator — rather than the SEC.

Meanwhile, a companion bill called the Anti-CBDC Surveillance Act permanently prohibits the Federal Reserve from issuing a digital dollar. A government-issued digital currency would be the Trump family’s primary competitor. Congress is in the process of banning it. Forever.

Tether, the largest stablecoin issuer, earned over $10 billion in profit last year from reserve income alone. Circle, the second largest, is on pace for nearly $3 billion. Those numbers will look small in a decade. And the Trump family’s USD1 is positioned — through legislation their allies are writing, with amendments from their opponents blocked — to capture an ever-growing share of that market in perpetuity. Since the Trump USD1 was launched it has already doubled in market cap and currently sits as the world’s fourth largest stablecoin by issuance volume.

The most vocal and righteous opponent of this bill is Elizabeth Warren, but despite her objections, she doesn’t represent all Democrats. One of two Democrats on the Senate Banking Committee to cross over to advance this bill is Ruben Gallego of Arizona who received approximately $10 million in crypto industry support in his 2024 Senate race. He was subsequently named Ranking Democrat on the Digital Assets subcommittee — the subcommittee that oversees this exact legislation.

Earlier this year he held a fundraising retreat at a luxury Sedona resort alongside Marc Andreessen, whose firm has invested in over 100 crypto startups and contributed more than $44 million to the same PAC that spent millions electing Gallego. So there’s blame to go around.


Teapot Dome was one transaction. One bribed official. One cabinet secretary. This is a sitting president using the legislative process to build a private financial empire — with no ethics provisions, no guardrails on his personal conflicts, and seemingly only one senator fighting it.

Three scandals. Three weeks. Any one of them, in any previous era of American governance, would have ended a presidency. Together, they represent something we don’t yet have adequate language for — not because the words don’t exist, but because we’ve never needed them at this scale before.

The historians will have plenty to write about. Our job is to make sure the story doesn’t get lost in the noise while it’s still happening.

Meidas+ is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support our work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.


For deeper dives into economic and socioeconomic stories, visit UNFTR.com or @UNFTR on YouTube. Make sure to sign up for the FREE weekly UNFTR newsletter here.


SOURCES

Yahoo News / Daily Beast: Trump’s Own Handpicked Lawyer Quits Treasury in Disgust at Massive $1.8B Grift https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/trump-own-handpicked-lawyer-quits-080655433.html

The Intercept: Trump’s “Anti-Weaponization” Fund Is a Handout to His Hardcore Supporters https://theintercept.com/2026/05/19/trump-anti-weaponization-fund-jan-6/

The Daily Beast: Trump Insiders Face Wild Allegations After ‘Insane Pattern’ Spotted on Polymarket and Kalshi

https://www.thedailybeast.com/trump-insiders-face-wild-allegations-after-insane-pattern-spotted-on-polymarket-and-kalshi/

Euronews - Stock Trades Reveal Trump Made Massive Gains on Big Tech Bets

https://www.euronews.com/business/2026/05/15/trump-discloses-stock-trades-revealing-massive-gains-in-2026-with-bets-on-big-tech

Britannica: Teapot Dome Scandal

https://www.britannica.com/event/Teapot-Dome-Scandal

Britannica: Watergate Scandal

https://www.britannica.com/event/Watergate-Scandal

Wikipedia: Congressional Budget and Impoundment Control Act of 1974 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Congressional_Budget_and_Impoundment_Control_Act_of_1974

Bill of Rights Institute - The Iran-Contra Affair - https://billofrightsinstitute.org/essays/the-iran-contra-affair/

CNBC: Senate Banking Committee Advances CLARITY Act in 15-9 Vote https://www.cnbc.com/2026/05/14/clarity-act-congress-crypto-senate.html

UNFTR: The Heist, Part Two: The CLARITY Completes It (Video)

Teapot Dome

https://www.history.com/articles/teapot-dome-scandal

Teapot Dome Photo credits: US Senate Historical Archive

Iran Contra Photo Credits: Britannica and National Security Archive

Watergate Photo Credits: History.com and FBI





Sunday, March 10, 2024

Room erupts in laughter as Watergate witness humiliates Matt Gaetz

 
REMINDER....



BREAKING: Republican Congressman Matt Gaetz just tried to embarrass Watergate prosecutor John Dean and got humiliated instead.








BREAKING: Matt Gaetz just hit Hunter Biden for his substance abuse issues, and was immediately called out for his OWN DUI as the crowd laughed during today’s impeachment hearing.

Sunday, October 23, 2022

January 6 committee subpoenas Trump. Will he successfully use the courts to run out the clock?








The January 6 House select committee investigating the insurrection has now formally subpoenaed former President Donald Trump to testify. This congressional subpoena raises questions of both form and substance.  

This video looks to the subpoena of Richard Nixon's tapes from the Watergate affair to discuss the issues of form, and looks to a law enforcement practice referred to as "tickling the wire" to discuss matters of substance.  




Wednesday, March 31, 2021

RSN: Matt Gaetz Under Investigation for Sexual Relationship With 17-Year-Old

 

 

Reader Supported News


"Please Help Ensure That RSN Will Be Around"

Reader Supported News: For the 99%.

Most of us know that the mainstream media, primarily owned by the right, rigidly controls information and the message. It’s become increasingly difficult to get the truth, backed by scientific thinking, logic and common sense.

Reader Supported News provides reliable, factual information and informed opinion – and offers a forum to intelligently discuss the major issues that affect our lives.

Please help ensure that RSN will be around for a long, long time to do its job for us. Please consistently support RSN to the best of your ability, at whatever level you can afford.

Carol, RSN Reader-Supporter

Sure, I'll make a donation!


Update My Monthly Donation


If you would prefer to send a check:
Reader Supported News
PO Box 2043
Citrus Hts, CA 95611


Reader Supported News
31 March 21

It's Live on the HomePage Now:
Reader Supported News


FINAL DAY OF MARCH: FUNDING BADLY NEEDED — We don’t have enough funding. There’s really no other way to say it. Every fundraising step we take is an attempt to address that one central problem. Please take a moment to make a donation. / Marc Ash, Founder Reader Supported News

Sure, I'll make a donation!


Matt Gaetz Under Investigation for Sexual Relationship With 17-Year-Old
Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-FL). (photo: Alex Wong/Getty)
David Knowles, Yahoo! News
Knowles writes: 

ep. Matt Gaetz, R-Fla., is under investigation by the Department of Justice for a sexual relationship he allegedly had with a 17-year-old girl, the New York Times reported Tuesday.

The investigation was started in the final months of the Trump administration under then-Attorney General William Barr, the Times reported. The agency is looking into whether Gaetz, a close ally of the former president, violated federal sex trafficking laws by paying for the young woman to travel with him outside of Florida.

Gaetz has yet to be charged with a crime.

Earlier Tuesday, Axios reported that Gaetz, who is 38, had told associates he was considering not seeking reelection so that he could pursue a job opportunity with the staunchly conservative network Newsmax. As other outlets picked up on that story, Gaetz chided one for incorrectly identifying him as a congressman from South Florida.

At a February speech he delivered at this year's Conservative Political Action Conference in Orlando, Fla., Gaetz declared, “Many days I’m a marked man in Congress, a wanted man by the deep state, but every day I’m a Florida man.”

Gaetz told the Times that while his lawyers have been in contact with the Justice Department, he had been told he is not the target of an investigation.

“I only know that it has to do with women,” Gaetz told the paper. “I have a suspicion that someone is trying to recategorize my generosity to ex-girlfriends as something more untoward.”

In a telephone interview Tuesday evening with Axios reporter Johnathan Swan, Gaetz clarified that he was innocent.

"The allegations against me are as searing as they are false," Gaetz said. "I believe that there are people at the Department of Justice who are trying to criminalize my sexual conduct, you know when I was a single guy."

"I have definitely, in my single days, provided for women I've dated," Gaetz added. "You know, I've paid for flights, for hotel rooms. I’ve been, you know, generous as a partner. I think someone is trying to make that look criminal when it is not."

As the story continued to gain traction Tuesday night, Gaetz tweeted that he and his family have been the target of an extortion plot under investigation by the FBI and that the story of his relationship with a minor was intended to "thwart that investigation."

Gaetz then appeared on Tucker Carlson's Fox News program to repeat his denials that the story in the Times was true.

"It is a horrible allegation and it is a lie," Gaetz said. "The New York Times is running a story that I have traveled with a 17-year-old woman and that is verifiably false. People can look at my travel records and see that that is not the case."

Yet Carlson maintained a measure of skepticism about Gaetz's claims that the allegations against him were part of an elaborate extortion plot.

"If you just saw our Matt Gaetz interview... that was one of the weirdest interviews I've ever conducted," Carlson said, adding, "I don't think that clarified much."

The fast-moving developments left more questions than answers about one of the most high-profile Republican politicians in the country. Not lost in the fray is the fact that, in December, Gaetz announced his engagement to 26-year-old Ginger Luckey.

READ MORE


Capitol police patrol Capitol Hill. (photo: Alex Wroblewski/Getty Images)
Capitol police patrol Capitol Hill. (photo: Alex Wroblewski/Getty Images)


Two Capitol Police Officers Sue Trump for Injuries Sustained During January 6 Riot
Kyle Cheney, POLITICO
Cheney writes: "Two Capitol Police officers injured in hand-to-hand combat during the Jan. 6 insurrection are suing former President Donald Trump for inciting his supporters, many of whom later stormed Congress and formed a mob that assaulted more than 100 officers protecting lawmakers."

Officers James Blassingame and Sidney Hemby described a severe physical and emotional toll from the riot that continues to haunt them.

Officers James Blassingame and Sidney Hemby described a severe physical and emotional toll from the riot that continues to haunt them. And in a 40-page lawsuit, they said Trump bears direct responsibility for unleashing violent followers upon the Capitol. Both officers are seeking unspecified compensation and damages greater than $75,000 apiece.

The lawsuit leans heavily on Trump’s own words to rioters on Jan. 6 — a public record that already resulted in his impeachment for incitement and public condemnations by lawmakers of both parties, as well as separate lawsuits by Rep. Bennie Thompson (D-Miss.) and Eric Swalwell (D-Calif.).

But it’s the officer’s harrowing personal accounts that add new chapters to the growing collection of horrors unleashed that day. Blassingame said he was slammed into a stone column while rioters hurled the N-word at him. Hemby sayid he suffered hand and knee injuries that require continued medical care. Both said they suffer from ongoing emotional trauma that has upended their lives.

The officers’ description of the mob also serves as a stark counterpoint to Trump, who this week falsely portrayed the riot as a peaceful gathering, where his supporters posed “zero threat” and were “hugging and kissing” police. More than 100 officers were injured that day and one, Brian Sicknick, later died of as-yet-undetermined causes — though video footage shows he was maced by a rioter hours before he collapsed. Two other officers have since died by suicide, which their families attribute to the trauma of the attack and the toll it took in the aftermath.

In the suit, Blassingame described watching helplessly as the mob overtook officers pinned to the Capitol’s west front. Then, he watched as a “sea of people” charged toward him and a small band of officers inside the Capitol Crypt.

“The insurrectionists were throwing items, and striking Officer Blassingame and the other USCP officers with their fists and weapons,” according to the suit, led by D.C.-based attorney Patrick Malone. “Among the weapons Officer Blassingame could see were flagpoles like those he had seen on D Street early in the morning; water bottles; bottles of other unknown liquids; parts of signs they were ripping from the walls of the Crypt and hallway; and flags, flagpoles, and rope-line posts that had been taken from the Crypt and other parts of the Capitol building.”

“Then a forceful surge of insurrectionists pushed forward and slammed Officer Blassingame against a stone column. He struck his spine and the back of his head and was unable to move,” the suit continues. “For the first time in his life, people were yelling into his face, calling him a [n——] repeatedly and throughout the attack in the Crypt. He lost count of the many times the racial slur was hurled at him.”

After breaking free of the mob, Blassingame relocated to aid the evacuation of House members to a committee room where they could remain protected until the riot was dispersed. He noted that many in the room remained maskless despite the threat of Covid but that “he had no option but to remain in place” until 7:30 p.m. that night.

Blassingame was guarding lawmakers when he heard the officer’s gunshot that fatally wounded rioter Ashli Babbitt. In the moment, he said it was unclear whether it was the start of a new surge of violence that would require him to draw his gun.

“The weight on Officer Blassingame has been heavy and pervasive,” the suit continues. “He was not able to sleep and he could not talk about what happened, even with his wife and friends. He suffered from depression that he could not address because he was too consumed with a sense of obligation to continue on with his professional responsibilities.”

Hemby, stationed on the Capitol’s East Front, was positioned at the top of the steps outside the rotunda when the mob approached and challenged officers to join them or stand down.

“Officer Hemby was attacked relentlessly. He was bleeding from a cut located less than an inch from his eye. He had cuts and abrasions on his face and hands and his body was pinned against a large metal door, fending off attacks,” according to the suit. “His primary focus was to survive and simply get home.”

Hemby, per the suit, couldn’t get medical attention until 9 p.m. that night.

“As a result of the attack, Officer Hemby’s left hand and left knee became swollen and painful. He was sprayed in the face and body with chemical sprays. His back and neck ached, and his skin burned,” he alleges. “Officer Hemby is under the care or an orthopedic medical specialist and receives physical therapy two to three days per week for his neck and back. He continues to sleep poorly and feels hyper-aware and on high alert during his waking hours.”

In arguing for damages, Malone points to comments by lawmakers — including Republicans like Rep. Liz Cheney and Senate GOP Leader Mitch McConnell — that squarely place the blame for the Jan. 6 insurrection upon Trump. McConnell in particular said in a floor speech that Trump could be held legally liable for inciting the riot.

“President Trump is still liable for everything he did while he was in office, as an ordinary citizen, unless the statute of limitations has run, still liable for everything he did while in office, didn't get away with anything yet — yet,” McConnell said at the time. “We have a criminal justice system in this country. We have civil litigation. And former presidents are not immune from being held accountable by either one.”

READ MORE


G. Gordon Liddy in 1997. (photo: AP)
G. Gordon Liddy in 1997. (photo: AP)


G. Gordon Liddy, Watergate Mastermind, Dead at 90
Will Lester, Associated Press
Lester writes: "G. Gordon Liddy, a mastermind of the Watergate burglary and a radio talk show host after emerging from prison, died Tuesday at age 90 at his daughter's home in Virginia."

His son, Thomas Liddy, confirmed the death but did not reveal the cause, other than to say it was not related to COVID-19.

Liddy, a former FBI agent and Army veteran, was convicted of conspiracy, burglary and illegal wiretapping for his role in the Watergate burglary, which led to the resignation of President Richard Nixon. He spent four years and four months in prison, including more than 100 days in solitary confinement.

“I’d do it again for my president,” he said years later.

Liddy was outspoken and controversial as a political operative under Nixon. He recommended assassinating political enemies, bombing a left-leaning think tank and kidnapping war protesters. His White House colleagues ignored such suggestions.

One of his ventures — the break-in at Democratic headquarters at the Watergate building in June 1972 — was approved. The burglary went awry, which led to an investigation, a cover-up and Nixon’s resignation in 1974.

Liddy also was convicted of conspiracy in the September 1971 burglary of the office of the psychiatrist of Daniel Ellsberg, the defense analyst who leaked the secret history of the Vietnam War known as the Pentagon Papers.

After his release from prison, Liddy became a popular, provocative and controversial radio talk show host. He also worked as a security consultant, writer and actor. His appearance — piercing dark eyes, bushy moustache and shaved head — made him a recognizable spokesman for products and TV guest.

On air, he offered tips on how to kill federal firearms agents, rode around with car tags saying “H20GATE” (Watergate) and scorned people who cooperated with prosecutors.

Born in Hoboken, New Jersey, George Gordon Battle Liddy was a frail boy who grew up in a neighborhood populated mostly by German-Americans. From friends and a maid who was a German national, Liddy developed a curiosity about German leader Adolf Hitler and was inspired by listening to Hitler’s radio speeches in the 1930s.

“If an entire nation could be changed, lifted out of weakness to extraordinary strength, so could one person,” Liddy wrote in “Will,” his autobiography. His personal story was intriguing enough that “Will” was the basis of a TV movie in 1982 starring Robert Conrad.

As a boy Liddy decided it was critical to face his fears and overcome them. At age 11, he roasted a rat and ate it to overcome his fear of rats. “From now on, rats could fear me as they feared cats,” he wrote.

After attending Fordham University and serving a stint in the Army, Liddy graduated from the Fordham University Law School and then joined the FBI. He ran unsuccessfully for Congress from New York in 1968 and helped organize Nixon’s presidential campaign in the state.

When Nixon took office, Liddy was named a special assistant to Treasury and served under Treasury Secretary David M. Kennedy. He later moved to the White House, then to Nixon’s reelection campaign, where his official title was general counsel.

Liddy was head of a team of Republican operatives known as “the plumbers,” whose mission was to find leakers of information embarrassing to the Nixon administration. Among Liddy’s specialties were gathering political intelligence and organizing activities to disrupt or discredit Nixon’s Democratic opponents.

While recruiting a woman to help carry out one of his schemes, Liddy tried to convince her that no one could force him to reveal her identity or anything else against his will. To convince her, He held his hand over a flaming cigarette lighter. His hand was badly burned. The woman turned down the job.

Liddy became known for such offbeat suggestions as kidnapping war protest organizers and taking them to Mexico during the Republican National Convention; assassinating investigative journalist Jack Anderson; and firebombing the Brookings Institution, a left-leaning think tank in Washington where classified documents leaked by Ellsberg were being stored.

Liddy and fellow operative Howard Hunt, along with the five arrested at Watergate, were indicted on federal charges three months after the June 1972 break-in. Hunt and his recruits pleaded guilty in January 1973, and James McCord and Liddy were found guilty. Nixon resigned on Aug. 9, 1974.

After the failed break-in attempt, Liddy recalled telling White House counsel John Dean, “If someone wants to shoot me, just tell me what corner to stand on, and I’ll be there, OK?” Dean reportedly responded, “I don’t think we’ve gotten there yet, Gordon.”

Liddy claimed in an interview with CBS’ “60 Minutes” that Nixon was “insufficiently ruthless” and should have destroyed tape recordings of his conversations with top aides.

Liddy learned to market his reputation as a fearless, if sometimes overzealous, advocate of conservative causes. His syndicated radio talk show, broadcast from Virginia-based WJFK, was long one of the most popular in the country. He wrote best-selling books, acted in TV shows like “Miami Vice,” was a frequent guest lecturer on college campuses, started a private-eye franchise and worked as a security consultant. For a time, he teamed on the lecture circuit with an unlikely partner, 1960s LSD guru Timothy Leary.

In the mid-1990s, Liddy told gun-toting radio listeners to aim for the head when encountered by agents of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms. “Head shots, head shots,” he stressed, explaining that most agents wear bullet-resistant vests under their jackets. Liddy said later he wasn’t encouraging people to hunt agents, but added that if an agent comes at someone with deadly force, “you should defend yourself and your rights with deadly force.”

Liddy always took pride in his role in Watergate. He once said: “I am proud of the fact that I am the guy who did not talk.”

READ MORE


College library. (photo: Manchan/Getty Images)
College library. (photo: Manchan/Getty Images)


Michelle Goldberg | The Social Justice Purge at Idaho Colleges
Michelle Goldberg, The New York Times
Goldberg writes: "What's happening in Idaho is not unique. All over the country, state legislators are trying to curtail teaching about racism and sexism, in universities as well as elementary schools."

Republican lawmakers try to cancel diversity programs.


ast month, I wrote that right-wing legislatures trying to ban critical race theory from public schools and institutions were a far more direct threat to free speech than what’s often called cancel culture.

Some opponents of critical race theory responded that these bans aren’t meant to prohibit teaching about critical race theory; that they are, rather, meant to protect individuals, especially children, from coerced speech and indoctrination.

“C.R.T.’s critics aren’t arguing that no one has the right to talk and write about C.R.T. (particularly among adults on college campuses); they are resisting the implication that C.R.T. is a settled and acceptable dogma,” Christine Rosen wrote in Commentary. “They also take issue with the way this theory is being imposed on schoolchildren, many of whom have been forced to denounce immutable parts of themselves, such as their skin color and sex, in C.R.T. struggle sessions.”

READ MORE


Javier Ambler. (photo: Facebook)
Javier Ambler. (photo: Facebook)


Two Ex-Texas Sheriff Deputies Indicted in Javier Ambler's Death
Paul J. Weber and Jake Bleiberg, Yahoo! News
Excerpt: "Two former Texas sheriff's deputies were arrested Tuesday on manslaughter charges in the 2019 death of a man whom they shocked with stun guns after a police chase that was filmed by real-time police TV series 'Live PD,' authorities said."

The charges are the first directly tied to the death of Javier Ambler, a Black man whose car deputies chased for 22 minutes after trying to pull him over for allegedly failing to dim his headlights to oncoming traffic. Ambler, a former postal worker, died after deputies repeatedly used stun guns on him, despite his pleas that he was sick and couldn’t breathe. The stop in suburban Austin was caught on camera by “Live PD,” which was canceled by the A&E Network in June.

The indictments were announced as a former Minneapolis police officer is being tried in the death of George Floyd, a case that has again brought police brutality and racial injustice to the forefront in the U.S.

Former Williamson County Sheriff's Deputies James Johnson, 36, and Zachary Camden, 26, were both charged Monday with second-degree manslaughter, Travis County District Attorney Jose Garza said. They were booked into a Travis County jail on Tuesday and released on $150,000 bond each within an hour, according to a spokeswoman for the Travis County Sheriff's Office.

“We are very pleased to see that the Travis County District Attorney is serious about seeking justice for our family. Our goal has always been to hold these officers accountable so that there are no more families who have to suffer like ours has," said Javier Ambler Sr., Ambler's father, in a statement provided by attorneys for the family.

Defense attorneys for the former deputies dismissed the indictments as political and said Ambler's death was the result of heart disease and his “physical exertion in resisting” the deputies.

“Mr. Johnson and Mr. Camden are neither morally nor legally responsible for his death,” said attorneys Ken Ervin and Doug O’Connell. “We are requesting a trial as soon possible where we can ensure politics, campaign promises, and sensationalized media portrayals will not distort the truth of what occurred.”

Garza, a Democrat who was elected by a wide margin in November, said during his campaign for district attorney that he planned to prioritize Ambler's case.

Former Williamson County Sheriff Robert Chody was also indicted last year on charges of destroying or concealing video in an investigation into Ambler's death.

Johnson, who initiated the traffic stop, is Black. Camden is white. Both deputies had “Live PD” crews with them at the time.

Police body camera video of Ambler’s death shows the gasping 400-pound (180-kilogram) man telling the deputies that he wants to comply with their demands but can’t because he has congestive heart failure.

“I am not resisting,” Ambler cries. “Sir, I can’t breathe. ... Please. ... Please.”

The body camera video was published by the Austin American-Statesman and KVUE-TV last year. A&E has said its video never aired because of a policy against showing a death.

The indictments accuse the deputies of acting "recklessly" by "continuing all described restraint and actions when (Ambler) stated on multiple occasions he could not breathe and had a health condition.”

A&E did not respond to a request for comment on the indictments.

READ MORE


Luis Cresencio Sandoval. (photo: newsbeezer.com)
Luis Cresencio Sandoval. (photo: newsbeezer.com)


Mexican Soldiers Detained by Angry Villagers After Shooting of Guatemalan Migrant
Reuters
Excerpt: "Fifteen Mexican soldiers were detained for hours by angry villagers at a remote stretch of Mexico's southern border with Guatemala after a soldier shot dead a Guatemalan migrant, Mexico's defense ministry said on Tuesday."

Defense Minister Luis Cresencio Sandoval said a soldier on Monday afternoon had opened fire on a car that fled in reverse to avoid a military checkpoint in the Motozintla municipality of the state of Chiapas, near the Guatemalan border.

The shots killed a man described by the Chiapas Attorney General’s office as a 30-year-old migrant from Guatemala. Guatemala’s Foreign Ministry identified him as Elvin Mazariegos.

Shortly after the shooting, about 300 people from the local border area, including Guatemalans, arrived at the checkpoint armed with sticks and stones and shouting insults, Sandoval said, speaking at a regular government news conference.

“Obviously, they demanded justice,” Sandoval said.

At about 3 p.m. the group detained 15 soldiers, three vehicles and 17 guns, saying they would take them to Guatemala. About three hours later, amid dialogue with government officials, the group let nine soldiers go, Sandoval said.

They released the remaining soldiers, cars and weapons around 3 a.m. on Tuesday, he added.

Sandoval said the group, which was still on Mexican soil, reached a deal with officials for “economic reparation” over the killing, which occurred two days after the death of a Salvadoran woman while in police custody in the Mexican city of Tulum.

Sandoval did not say how much was paid. The protesters also demanded the soldier responsible face justice.

Describing the soldier’s actions as “erroneous,” Sandoval said the man had not faced any kind of aggression and had been taken into custody for questioning.

The Chiapas Attorney General’s Office said Mazariegos suffered gunshot wounds to the neck and chest, and that it had opened an investigation into the killing.

Mexico’s foreign ministry offered condolences and said there would be a deal for reparations.

READ MORE


Jim Vaughn became concerned about the water in Pittsboro after testing found PFAS in the supply. (photo: Jeremy M Lange/Guardian UK)
Jim Vaughn became concerned about the water in Pittsboro after testing found PFAS in the supply. (photo: Jeremy M Lange/Guardian UK)


We Sampled Tap Water Across the US - and Found Arsenic, Lead and Toxic Chemicals
Ryan Felton, Lisa Gill and Lewis Kendall, Guardian UK and Consumer Reports
Excerpt: "A nine-month investigation by the Guardian and Consumer Reports found forever chemicals, arsenic and lead in samples taken across the US."


n Connecticut, a condo had lead in its drinking water at levels more than double what the federal government deems acceptable. At a church in North Carolina, the water was contaminated with extremely high levels of potentially toxic PFAS chemicals ( a group of compounds found in hundreds of household products). The water flowing into a Texas home had both – and concerning amounts of arsenic too.

All three were among locations that had water tested as part of a nine-month investigation by Consumer Reports (CR) and the Guardian into the US’s drinking water.

Since the passage of the Clean Water Act in 1972, access to safe water for all Americans has been a US government goal. Yet millions of people continue to face serious water quality problems because of contamination, deteriorating infrastructure, and inadequate treatment at water plants.

CR and the Guardian selected 120 people from around the US, out of a pool of more than 6,000 volunteers, to test for arsenic, lead, PFAS (per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances), and other contaminants. The samples came from water systems that together service more than 19 million people.

A total of 118 of the 120 samples had concerning levels of PFAS or arsenic above CR’s recommended maximum, or detectable amounts of lead. Testing of the samples showed:

  • More than 35% of the samples had PFAS, potentially toxic “forever chemicals”, at levels above CR’s recommended maximum.

  • About 8% of samples had arsenic, at levels above CR’s recommended maximum.

  • In total, 118 out of 120 samples had detectable levels of lead.

The study has some limitations: the quality of the water at one location on a single day doesn’t necessarily reflect the quality of the water supplied by an entire system or at other times. But the ambitious undertaking, with community water systems chosen by CR’s statisticians from a representative mix of systems across the country, provides a unique view into some of the most significant challenges in America’s ongoing drinking water crisis.

Almost every sample tested had measurable levels of PFAS, a group of compounds found in hundreds of household products. These chemicals are linked to learning delays in children, cancer, and other health problems. More than 35 percent exceeded a safety threshold that CR scientists and other health experts believe should be the maximum.

Yet many consumers have never heard of PFAS.

Hung Ng, a resident of Florida, New York, says he has long used home water filters, in part to remove lead. But the 69-year-old says he didn’t know anything about PFAS until he had his water tested as part of this investigation, which found comparatively high levels of the chemicals in his water. “Now I’ve got to find something to filter out the PFAS,” Ng says.

The tests revealed other problems as well. About 8% of samples had levels of arsenic – which gets into drinking water through natural deposits or industrial or agricultural pollution – above CR’s recommended maximum for drinking water. And almost every sample had measurable amounts of lead, a heavy metal that leaches from corroding water lines and home plumbing fixtures. It is unsafe at any level.

In response to the findings, Environmental Protection Agency spokesperson Andrea Drinkard says that 93% of the population supplied by community water systems gets water that meets “all health-based standards all of the time” and that the agency has set standards for more than 90 contaminants. That includes arsenic and lead but does not include PFAS.

America’s water crisis, while widespread, affects some communities more than others, according to an analysis of more than 140,000 public water systems published by the Guardian in February. It found that access to clean drinking water is highly unequal in the US, with water systems that service poorer and rural counties far more likely to have violations than those that provide water to wealthier or urban ones. Water systems in counties with large Latino populations were particularly likely to have violations, the Guardian found.

PFAS: the ‘forever chemical’ problem

The PFAS results from CR’s tests are particularly troubling.

Manufacturers use PFAS to make stain-resistant fabrics and carpets, water-repellent clothing, nonstick cookware, and hundreds of other common products. The compounds can seep into water from factories, landfills, and other sources. And because they don’t easily break down in the environment, they’re often called “forever chemicals”.

Investigation into the health effects of PFAS exposure is ongoing, but some of the strongest evidence about their potential risks comes from research of about 69,000 people in and around Parkersburg, W Va. The research – part of a settlement between DuPont, which makes some PFAS, and residents of the community – was depicted in the 2019 movie Dark Waters.

It found a “probable link” between exposure to a type of PFAS and six health problems: high cholesterol, ulcerative colitis, thyroid disease, pregnancy-induced hypertension, and testicular and kidney cancers. Research has also linked some PFAS to learning delays in children.

At least 2,337 communities in 49 states have drinking water known to be contaminated with PFAS, according to a January analysis by the Environmental Working Group (EWG), an advocacy organization.

CR’s tests results confirm the ubiquity of the chemicals: We found PFAS in 117 of the 120 samples we tested, from locations across the country.

Despite mounting evidence of widespread contamination and health risks, the EPA has still not set an enforceable legal limit for PFAS in drinking water. Instead, it has established only voluntary limits, which apply to just two of the better-studied forever chemicals–PFOA, or perfluorooctanoic acid, and PFOS, or perfluorooctanesulfonic acid–at 70 parts per trillion combined.

Harvard environmental health professor Philippe Grandjean has suggested that the limit should be just 1 ppt for PFOA and PFOS, citing his 2013 research– partly funded by the EPA – showing decreased vaccine response in children exposed to the chemicals.

CR’s scientists say the maximum allowed amount should be 5 ppt for a single PFAS chemical and 10 ppt for two or more.Among the 120 samples CR tested, more than a third had PFAS levels above 10 ppt, and more than a quarter exceeded 5 ppt for a single PFAS chemical.

Two samples had PFAS levels above the federal advisory level of 70 ppt, with the highest amount – 80.2 ppt–coming from a sample that Jim Vaughn, a 76-year-old retired electrical equipment salesman, collected at his church in Pittsboro, NC.

Vaughn wasn’t particularly surprised, he says. Places such as Pittsboro–a community of about 6,700 on the fringes of North Carolina’s Research Triangle, which is anchored by three universities and filled with industry and high-tech business – are used to getting “dumped on,” he says. “It’s that little feeling of helplessness. Is there something that the town will do about it? Or will we let it ride?”

Indeed, residents of Pittsboro have reason to worry, beyond the results of CR’s tests. In 2007, an EPA study found PFAS contamination in the Cape Fear River Basin, a major source of drinking water for the eastern half of North Carolina. Some of the highest levels came from the Haw River in the basin’s north end – where Pittsboro gets its water.

Ongoing research out of Duke University, in nearby Durham, has also raised concerns. It found that levels of PFAS in a study of 49 Pittsboro residents’ blood are two to four times higher than that of the general US population. Heather Stapleton, the project’s lead investigator, says Vaughn’s test results align with her team’s findings.

“If you think about the number of communities that could be impacted, it’s close to a million people,” she says.

Chris Kennedy, town manager for Pittsboro, says the town was not a source of PFAS but that it was “diligently working towards removing PFAS from our potable water supply”. He adds that the town is installing filters at the water treatment plant to remove at least 90% of PFAS by the end of 2021 and is taking steps “to reduce contamination into the Haw River, which will provide the best results long term”.

Arsenic: a toxin in the water

More than 1,200 miles away from Pittsboro, Sandy and Scott Phillips sat around their kitchen table in Texas on a weekday in February reflecting on the test results for their water samples.

Last year, looking to downsize, they built the custom home of their dreams in a new development in Round Rock, 20 miles north of Austin.

But soon after moving in, they began to notice the water had an unusual odor, prompting them to invest thousands in a water softening and reverse osmosis water filtration system.

Not long after, the couple got their water tested as part of CR’s project, taking samples from water before it was filtered. The results were concerning: high not just in PFAS (32.8 ppt) but also in arsenic, at 3.3 parts per billion. “We get this gorgeous house,” Sandy Phillips says, “and then the water is terrible.”

Bill Brown, general manager of the Jonah Water Special Utility District, the couple’s water supplier, says it “has complied with all federal and state minimum contaminant level standards for arsenic and lead for many years”. He says that while CR’s results conflicted with its records, the water district will investigate. He did not comment on the PFAS found in the Phillipses’ water.

In the early 2000s, the EPA considered a drinking water limit for arsenic of 3 ppb, before settling on 10 ppb as an amount that balances the costs for water system operators while reducing health risks. CR scientists have long said the EPA should set a limit of 3 ppb or lower, in line with what other health experts and environmental advocacy groups, such as the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC), have called for.

Almost every sample CR tested had measurable levels of arsenic, including 10–or about 8 percent–with levels between 3 and 10 ppb. Previous tests from CR and others have shown elevated levels in juices and baby foods.

Research suggests that exposure to even low levels of arsenic can pose health risks over the long term. A 2014 study in the journal Environmental Health found an association between water with arsenic of 5 ppb or greater and a five- to six-point IQ reduction in children.

Two states–New Hampshire and New Jersey–have lowered their arsenic limit to 5 ppb, citing warnings from studies. The EPA itself even sets its “maximum contaminant level goal”–the level below which there is no known or expected risk to health–at zero for arsenic.

Lead: no safe amount

The Phillipses, in Texas, were especially fortunate to have installed a filtration system because the results of their unfiltered tap test showed high levels of not only arsenic but also lead, at 5.8 ppb. (CR’s follow-up tests of the couple’s filtered water showed trace amounts of lead and levels of arsenic and PFAS well within CR’s recommended limits.)

The risks of lead, and problems with how water utilities test for it, became a national concern when news of the water crisis in Flint, Mich., exploded in 2015. Scientists and the EPA agree that there’s no safe exposure level of lead. But taking into consideration the feasibility of achieving lower levels, the EPA says utilities have to take significant steps to lower lead levels – including replacing lead service lines – only when 10% of samples from homes in their service areas exceed 15 ppb.

Consumer advocates say those EPA regulations are problematic – a reality underscored by the testing results of water being piped into a condo owned by Stephen and Robin Newberg in New Britain, Connecticut.

Lead typically works its way into drinking water through lead pipes that feed people’s homes or in the home’s plumbing itself.

While New Britain’s annual water quality report for customers indicates that its average lead level is 6 ppb, the Newbergs’ results showed a concentration of 31.2 ppb, more than double the EPA’s action level of 15 ppb.

Stephen Newberg, a former postal worker, says he drinks filtered water and his wife drinks bottled water, so he’s not personally worried. But the 66-year-old sits on the board of his condo, and he’s concerned about the possibility of the heavy metal being in his neighbors’ water.

Ramon Esponda, New Britain’s deputy director of public works, says that the city complies with the EPA’s lead regulations, based on its 2020 tests, which found an average lead level of 2 ppb. Esponda says that results of a single sample may be thrown off by new fixtures, recent plumbing work, or other factors.

The installation of new lead service lines – pipes that connect a water main in a street to individual buildings – was banned in 1986. But an estimated 3 million to 6 million homes and businesses nationwide still get water through older lines that contain lead, according to EPA estimates. An untold number of homes have plumbing fixtures made of the heavy metal. Exposure can especially pose risks in children, such as reduced IQ and behavioral problems.

The Newbergs’ results were the only ones in CR’s tests to be above the EPA action level. But almost every sample had measurable levels of lead, and health experts emphasize that no amount of lead is safe.

Erik Olson, senior strategic director of health and food at the NRDC, says the Newbergs’ results illustrate several problems with how the EPA regulates lead. One is that water systems typically test for lead only once every three years, and larger systems can get waivers to test every nine years. Another is that the sample sizes are generally small.

“There’s very little oversight, and they may not be testing the highest-risk homes,” Olson says.

The EPA, in the waning days of the Trump administration, finalized changes to the lead regulation that would require testing in elementary schools and established new rules regarding the steps water systems must take when lead is detected.

But the NRDC, the NAACP, and other groups recently sued the EPA, saying those steps didn’t go far enough, and urged the Biden administration to improve on them.

Solutions

People seeking cleaner drinking water do have some options for reducing their exposure to dangerous contaminants. But consumer advocates say that fixing the problem shouldn’t be up to consumers.

“Americans shouldn’t have to navigate bureaucracy and be forced to make significant investments in order to access clean tap water,” says Brian Ronholm, CR’s director of food policy.

Legislation passed last year by the House of Representatives would have authorized $22.5bn to replace lead service lines across the US, according to the NRDC, but the bill died in the Senate. The NRDC called for the Biden administration and Congress to enact legislation requiring the expeditious removal and replacement of lead lines.

Congress is also focusing on PFAS. In January, a congressional taskforce urged the Biden administration to take immediate steps to address PFAS contamination by, among other things, directing the EPA to phase out any uses for the chemicals deemed “non-essential,” to finalize a standard for PFOA and PFOS, and to accelerate cleanup.

Democratic congresswoman Debbie Dingell, a member of the taskforce, responded to the findings from CR’s tests, saying they show that “we do not have any time to waste as we battle these toxic chemicals.” She renewed her call for PFAS to be banned and designated as hazardous.

Pittsboro’s Jim Vaughn says that while government and industry debate, residents of his town are left with unsafe water. “The town that has the polluters in it, they’re getting their water from upstream, so what’s their impetus” to fix the problem, he says. “The ones downstream have no power over the ones upstream to force them to do that. I just don’t think it’s fair.”

Methodology: how consumers helped us test America’s tap water

Consumer Reports and the Guardian teamed up to ask our readers if they could help us investigate the nation’s drinking water. The response was overwhelming: more than 6,000 said “Yes!” From that pool, CR statisticians winnowed the group down to 120 volunteers representing a cross-section of the country and the water systems that service it. That included 12 samples from each of the Environmental Protection Agency’s 10 jursidictional regions. Within each region, testers were chosen to provide a mix of urban and rural locations as well as small and large water systems.

We were particularly interested in PFAS (per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances), chemicals notorious as much for their potential health risks as for their perseverance in the environment. Municipalities often don’t test PFAS, and when they do, only on a small scale. Each participant received test kits for PFAS as well as arsenic, lead, and other contaminants of concern, plus a detailed video showing how to collect the samples – precision really matters here!

When tests were complete, we sent the volunteers advice tailored to their specific results. While we can’t draw conclusions about any of the specific water systems, since only one sample came from each, together they provide powerful insights into problems faced by the nation as a whole. “While much of CR’s testing is done in our labs with our scientists, projects like these, need real-people,” says James Dickerson, CR’s chief scientific officer. “We are so grateful to the readers who made this possible, particularly those who shared their stories with us.”

READ MORE


Contribute to RSN

Update My Monthly Donation





Trump's Friday Meltdown: Begging Iran, Ditching Ukraine, and Blaming Everybody But Himself – 7/31/26

                                               LOTS OF POSTS IGNORED BY BLOGGER..... OR REMOVED ON THEIR WHIM! ALL POSTS ARE AVAILABLE ON MI...