BURIED IN SPAM FOLDER! I ENCOURAGE OTHERS TO SUBCRIBE TO THIS DAILY RECAP OF MASSACHUSETTS INFORMATION TO RECEIVE TIMELY POSTS!
|
|
UNDER CONSTRUCTION - MOVED TO MIDDLEBORO REVIEW AND SO ON https://middlebororeviewandsoon.blogspot.com/
BURIED IN SPAM FOLDER! I ENCOURAGE OTHERS TO SUBCRIBE TO THIS DAILY RECAP OF MASSACHUSETTS INFORMATION TO RECEIVE TIMELY POSTS!
|
|
Chris Lisinski State House News Service
Published Jun 2, 2021
Massachusetts regulators may need to expand PFAS monitoring into waste disposal, landfill and the atmosphere amid concerns about potential health risks from the chemicals, the head of the state Department of Environmental Protection said Tuesday.
The most recent regulatory updates for per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances, or PFAS, targeted drinking water because it is already a "well-understood exposure pathway and an area where we could make an important, immediate impact," DEP Commissioner Martin Suuberg told lawmakers and other officials.
Other states have broadened their focus, Suuberg said, adding that DEP is watching those efforts closely as it plans next steps to tackle the so-called "forever chemicals."

"We're mindful of the fact that waste disposal facilities, landfills are areas we might need to be looking at," Suuberg said in response to a question about expanding monitoring efforts. "The list of areas that we could look at is daunting, but I would say probably you're right – air is an area that all of us are going to need to take a look at."
Amid what Suuberg called "growing attention" about the presence of PFAS chemicals, a new intergovernmental task force kicked off its work Tuesday to analyze their impact in Massachusetts and craft recommended steps to limit contamination.
State Sen. Julian Cyr, one of the group's co-chairs, said Tuesday that members have "a lot of work to do."
"Increasingly, we're concerned that PFAS may affect most every town in the Cape and Islands District," Cyr, a Truro Democrat, said. "We all recognize that these forever chemicals, particularly their presence in the groundwater in a place like Cape Cod or on Martha's Vineyard or Nantucket – we only have a sole-source aquifer. There's not another option."
The man-made chemicals do not decompose entirely in the environment, and they are found in a range of products, from firefighting foams to nonstick cookware to food packaging. They have also been found to leach from packaging into Anvil 10+10, a pesticide the state has used to combat mosquito-borne illnesses, creating thorny problems for some communities.
Experts caution that exposure to PFAS chemicals can cause health problems, particularly in those who are immunocompromised, pregnant women and infants, Suuberg said.
During the task force's first meeting, Suuberg recounted recent developments in government efforts to rein in PFAS contamination. A "turning point" came in May 2016, Suuberg said, when the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency updated its health advisory with a lower PFAS concentration threshold of 70 parts per trillion.
Massachusetts went even further than federal guidelines. Late last year, DEP issued final rules for soil and groundwater cleanup and implemented final regulations setting the maximum contaminant level in drinking water for six PFAS compounds at 20 parts per trillion.
Since implementation of that new standard, a growing number of water systems have detected concentration of the compounds at levels requiring notification and response.
Fifty-one public water systems, which range in scope from covering entire towns to serving individual housing developments, have found PFAS chemicals at a concentration above the maximum contaminant level in at least one test, according to a DEP online map.
In North Attleboro, for example, one well tested above the PFAS threshold and has since been taken out of service by the town's water department, which is "investigating treatment options for possible future use of the well," according to DEP's website.
Suuberg said 600 public water systems, including 25 of the largest ones, have been sampled to test for PFAS. Most reported no issues, but the department is working with 23 of the community water systems with excessive PFAS levels, he said.
"Each one requires an individualized approach to figure out what the short-term answers will be to minimize PFAS exposure as well as developing long-term plans," Suuberg said.
Coletta, the DEP spokesperson, said Tuesday afternoon that the Abington/Rockland Water System had implemented sufficient PFAS treatment and then tested below the concentration threshold, pushing the list that Suuberg referenced down to 22.
The Legislature and Gov. Charlie Baker included funding in two supplemental budget bills to support sampling for PFAS contamination. Suuberg said the state has made $180 million available for 16 projects, mostly through the Clean Water Trust.
Over the coming months, members of the task force plan to dive into how PFAS chemicals affect the environment, who is responsible for contamination and remediation, and what steps Beacon Hill can take to address the growing concern.
The PFAS Interagency Task Force, created in the fiscal 2021 state budget via a Rep. Kate Hogan amendment, must complete its work and file a report by Dec. 31.
State legislators are now mulling over Gov. Charlie Baker’s amendments to their climate change bill that he returned to them over the weekend.
Baker did not sign the original bill that landed on his desk at the tail end of the legislative session last month, and lawmakers refiled the bill at the end of January with no changes.
“This reflects the great work we’ve done with the Legislature working in a collaborative environment over the last three weeks to strengthen our efforts to tackle climate change while protecting families,” said state Secretary of Energy and the Environment Kathleen Theoharides, who called the collaboration a “very productive conversation.”
State Sen. Julian Cyr, D-Truro, however, was not pleased with amendments that he felt weakened accountability.
"(T)he Legislature established benchmarks to hold the Commonwealth's executive branch accountable to reaching net-zero carbon emissions by 2050. We set these standards high to fend off the existential threat that climate change poses to communities like ours," Cyr said.
Initially, Baker complained he was rushed into signing the bill without time to make his own amendments. His administration both lauded the intent of the bill while criticizing it for potentially causing too much economic pain for too little gain over what was proposed in its own plan.
In his letter to legislators Sunday, Baker thanked them for their work and for giving him the opportunity to make amendments. His administration had initially been critical of the climate change bill for increasing the emissions reduction benchmark to 50% by 2030 instead of the 45% they had recommended.
In a prior interview, Theoharides said the additional 5% required a lot more effort, including hundreds of thousands more electric vehicles, a new low-carbon fuel standard that was far tougher than any in the U.S., and completely eliminated petroleum-based heating fuels.
In his amendments, Baker proposed a compromise of between 45% and 50% emissions reductions by 2030, with the exact amount set by the administration, depending on the level of technological advances that could provide for greater emissions reductions. The 2040 target was amended to a goal of between 65% and 75%.
“It is a legally binding target that sets you up for net-zero carbon emissions by 2050, but makes it not overly costly for the Commonwealth,” Theoharides said.
Other amendments included a compromise on the goal for the procurement of offshore wind. Baker proposed the state authorize up to 4,000 megawatts of power from offshore wind farms, 800 more than the 3,200 megawatts proposed by the Global Warming Solutions Act of 2008. Legislators had proposed adding 2,400 megawatts.
Baker also proposed an amendment to imposing emissions limits on sectors of the economy like transportation and building. Instead of a strict limit, his amendment makes the emissions reduction a target to be used for planning, provided the overall emission reduction goal is met. Theoharides said this will give some flexibility to the process if some sectors can achieve greater emissions reductions due to technological advances while others find it harder to comply.
Worried about the impact on affordable housing of a so-called “stretch” building code in the original bill that required new homes to have net-zero emissions on affordable housing, Baker’s amendments stressed energy-efficiency. Transition to a new code would be overseen by the state Department of Energy Resources and would not be mandatory until 2028.
Theoharides said the administration agreed with much of what the legislators proposed on environmental justice and decided to strengthen it by adding that the Department of Environmental Protection, when permitting certain projects, take into account the cumulative environmental impacts on the community of other projects.
“If you are permitting projects in areas with existing pollution, and you are adding to that, it is unlikely to be able to be permitted,” Theoharides said.
“We believe the administration went in good faith and was really thoughtful about how they prepared the amendments,” said Caitlin Peale Sloane, senior attorney and interim director of the Massachusetts Conservation Law Foundation.
But Sloane was concerned about the language in the proposed amendments, particularly in making emissions reductions “limits” instead of a minimum. She believed that industry should be shooting for a target that will deal with the emissions and climate change problem, not one that is believed to be technologically feasible. Hard goals inspire innovation, she believes.
“Industry will step up and adapt to meet them,” Sloane said.
Sloane worried about delaying the implementation of a new building code until 2028.
“The Governor’s own clean energy climate plan makes it clear that you are at a cost parity to build a net-zero house vs. a new house that uses fossil fuels,” she said. It’s more expensive to retrofit a home with fossil fuel heating systems than to build a clean energy home, Sloane said.
“The technology is out there for both market-value and affordable homes,” she said.
"I hope a compromise can be reached that reconciles the concerns of the administration, but the bill is actionable as written and urgently needs to become law," Cyr said.
LOTS OF POSTS IGNORED BY BLOGGER..... OR REMOVED ON THEIR WHIM! ALL POSTS ARE AVAILABLE ON MI...