Seth Moulton: Defense Investments. Congressional Oversight. Serious Questions.

                                                                                                     

 LOTS OF POSTS IGNORED BY BLOGGER.....

OR REMOVED ON THEIR WHIM!

ALL POSTS ARE AVAILABLE ON

MIDDLEBORO REVIEW AND SO ON

BLOGGER DOESN'T LIKE TRUTH OR FACTS!

BLOGGER DOESN'T LIKE FUND RAISERS AND DELETES

POSTS THAT INCLUDE FUNDRAISING THAT 'VIOLATES THEIR

UNDEFINED COMMUNITY STANDARDS SO ALL 'FUND RAISING'

IS DELETED - CONTRIBUTE AS YOU ARE INCLINED TO SUPPORT

IMPORTANT ISSUES! THESE ARE NOT SOLICITATIONS

NAZIS (FASCISTS) TARGET 'GROUPS' FOR THEIR DIVISIVE INTENTIONS.

SETH MOULTON POSTED ENDLESSLY ABOUT TRANS FOLKS. 

A FRIEND WAS A CONSTITUENT OF SETH MOULTON AND CONSTANTLY 

CRITICIZED HIM - MAYBE I SHOULD HAVE PAID CLOSER ATTENTION, 

BUT NOW YOU CAN! 

FROM WHAT WE SEE, SENATOR ED MARKEY HAS 2 BOZOS RUNNING 

AGAINST HIM ....SCRUTINIZE BOTH CANDIDATES BEFORE MAKING A 

DECISION! 

The other LOSER running against SENATOR MARKEY is ....

NONE OTHER THAN LOSER, CARPETBAGGER, CRYPTO SCAMMER 

JOHN DEATON WHO NEVER SEEMS TO FIND THE TRUTH OR FACTS! 

NOTICE IN THE FOOD FIGHT WITH SETH MOULTON - NO SUBSTANCE! 

MASS GOP LOVES TO SUPPORT LIARS AND HAS A LONG HISTORY OF 

DOING SO....NEVER ANY SUBSTANCE! 

DO YOUR RESEARCH AND MAKE AN INFORMED VOTE!

A new WBUR report published today sheds troubling new light on Congressman Seth Moulton's financial interests and raises serious questions about why he has spent months delaying the release of information Massachusetts voters deserve to see before they cast their ballots. The report details how Moulton accumulated private stakes worth between $1 million - $5 million in companies tied to the defense sector while serving on the House Armed Services Committee – the very committee responsible for overseeing the industry and approving policies and spending that directly affect it. These were not ordinary investments available to the public. They were exclusive private deals that generated extraordinary returns while Moulton sat in a position of public trust. READ MORE Just as striking is Moulton's sudden reversal. Congressman Moulton began investing in these companies in 2021 and continued doing so for years while serving on the committee responsible for overseeing the industry in which they operate. During that time, he showed little interest in addressing the obvious questions these investments raised. It wasn't until he began gearing up for a Senate campaign that he publicly commented on them, and even then his response was to defend the practice. In a September 2025 statement, he declared that he “cannot recuse myself from my constitutional duty to vote on matters coming before the House.” Only now, after reporters began asking questions and voters began paying attention, has Moulton reversed course. His campaign says he will place the assets in a blind trust and recuse himself from votes affecting those companies. After years of deflecting and then defending these investments, it's fair to ask why now? The investments didn't change. The committee didn't change. The only thing that changed is that Seth Moulton is now running for Senate. That is what makes this episode so troubling. A member of Congress charged with overseeing the defense industry participated in exclusive private investment opportunities tied to that same industry, defended those arrangements for years, and only moved to address the issue after it became a public controversy. Yet voters still do not know the full extent of Moulton's financial interests. He has delayed filing both his financial disclosure report and tax returns, leaving Massachusetts voters without information they should have before they begin casting ballots. Public trust is built on transparency and accountability. It requires leaders to confront potential conflicts of interests before they become public controversies, not scramble to address them after they've been uncovered. Better yet, it requires the judgment to avoid those conflicts altogether and the integrity to hold oneself to the highest standards the public deserves. At every step, Congressman Moulton's response has followed the same pattern: deny there is a problem, delay transparency, and change course only when public pressure becomes impossible to ignore. That may be a political strategy, but it is not the standard Massachusetts voters should expect from someone seeking a seat in the United States Senate. The people of Massachusetts deserve better. Sincerely, Cam Charbonnier Campaign Manager Markey for Senate Share This Email   Share This Email   Share This Email   Share This Email DONATE TODAY TO SUPPORT ED

How did you like this email? Ed Markey for Senate | 124 Washington St Suite 101 | Foxboro, MA 02035 US

 FROM THE DOWNBALLOT:

Morning Digest: Centrist congressman launches primary challenge against prominent liberal senator

Seth Moulton says Ed Markey is "too old" to run again, but will primary voters prioritize generational change over ideology?

David Nir Oct 16

Massachusetts Rep. Seth Moulton (D), at left (credit: Seth Moulton Facebook)

Leading Off

MA-Sen

Democratic Rep. Seth Moulton kicked off a primary challenge to Sen. Ed Markey on Wednesday, explicitly painting the long-time incumbent as “too old” in comments to the Washington Post.

Markey, 79, has served in Congress since winning a House seat in 1976, though it wasn’t until 2013 that he earned a promotion to the upper chamber in a special election to replace John Kerry, who resigned to become Barack Obama’s secretary of state.

During his long career, Markey has established himself as an outspoken liberal and has focused heavily on combating climate change. While he’s seldom faced difficult reelection campaigns, he turned back another primary challenger five years ago when he defeated Rep. Joseph P. Kennedy by a 55-45 margin.

Like Moulton, who is 46, the much younger Kennedy (at the time 39) presented himself as an agent of generational change. But despite his famous name, Kennedy struggled to match Markey’s liberal bona fides and his support from figures like New York Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and a host of the best-known progressive organizations.

It’s a problem the centrist Moulton will face as well. Moulton, a Marine veteran, first won Massachusetts’ 6th Congressional District by knocking off a tarnished Democratic incumbent, John Tierney. His subsequent attempts to take on much bigger targets, however, have fallen well short.

After Democrats regained the House in 2018, Moulton led an ill-fated plot to stop Nancy Pelosi from once again becoming speaker. After that gambit failed (Moulton even wound up voting for Pelosi to reclaim her old job), he then sought to run for president. After a desultory few months in which he didn’t qualify for any debates, he abandoned ship.

In announcing his latest bid, Moulton leaned heavily into the age gap between the two candidates in his launch video.

“We’re in a crisis, and with everything we learned last election, I just don’t believe Sen. Markey should be running for another six-year term at 80 years old,” he said. “Even more, I don’t think someone who’s been in Congress for half a century is the right person to meet this moment and win the future.” (Markey will turn 80 next year.)

But Moulton’s more moderate record may not appeal to primary voters. In particular, he generated a firestorm of criticism from fellow Democrats shortly after last year’s presidential election when he expressed his opposition to allowing transgender kids to play in girls’ sports—and hostility toward his party for allegedly suppressing such views.

“Democrats spend way too much time trying not to offend anyone rather than being brutally honest about the challenges many Americans face,” he told the New York Times. “I have two little girls, I don’t want them getting run over on a playing field by a male or formerly male athlete, but as a Democrat I’m supposed to be afraid to say that.”

Despite the hostile response, which included the resignation of a top aide, Moulton remained defiant, declaring, “The backlash proves my point.” He also dared his critics to challenge him at the ballot box, saying, “Good luck, I mean, run against me if you want.”

Now, before a much larger electorate, those critics will get the chance to unite against him.