LOTS OF POSTS IGNORED BY BLOGGER.....
ALL POSTS ARE AVAILABLE ON
MIDDLEBORO REVIEW AND SO ON
 |
This one’s open, so feel free to share it anywhere. Quick boost that really helps: ♥ + Restack + a short comment.
BREAKING: Six Storage Units Belonging To Jeffrey Epstein Have Been Discovered, Completely Untouched By ANYONE, Including The FBI
Multiple Epstein storage units—possibly containing computers, photos, and discs—were never searched. In a “transparency” era, the missing evidence is the story.
The Storage Units the FBI Never Opened
There are two kinds of “bombshell” stories.
The first kind is flashy. Names. Photos. A headline engineered to hit your brain like a jump scare.
The second kind is worse: a procedural failure so enormous it tells you exactly how the system works — and who it works for.
This is the second kind.
Because new reporting is raising a question that should make everyone sit up straight:
Why were multiple Jeffrey Epstein storage units—allegedly holding computers, photographs, CDs, and other materials—never searched by authorities?
Yup…
 |
If those lockers exist (and records indicate they do), and if investigators never touched them, then the Epstein case isn’t just a story about what was done.
It’s also a story about what was left behind, and we now might finally know what happened to ALL of that disappearing evidence from the estate and LSJ Island:
 |
The “Transparency” Dump That Didn’t Answer the Only Questions That Matter
On January 30, 2026, the U.S. Department of Justice announced it had published over 3 million additional pages in response to the Epstein Files Transparency Act, signed into law on November 19, 2025. The DOJ said the production included more than 2,000 videos and 180,000 images, and claimed the rolling release was necessary due to redactions intended to protect victims.
That’s the official story.
The other story — the one survivors, watchdogs, and lawmakers keep pointing to — is that this “transparency” operation looks more like information management: heavy redactions, delayed timelines, and constant friction around who gets to see what.
And now we have a new piece of the puzzle:
 |
While millions of pages are being pushed into the public sphere, some of the most potentially important physical evidence may never have been collected in the first place.
And Trump is ryng desperately to drag you away from this news by threatening Iran this morning:
 |
The Storage Units: What’s Alleged, and Why It Matters
According to investigative reporting cited widely in the last 48 hours, Epstein maintained at least six storage units across the U.S. — rentals that reportedly continued up until his death in 2019. The reporting describes items in those units like computers, discs, and photographs, including materials moved from Epstein properties (including his island and residences).
 |
Here’s the part that matters:
Authorities searched certain Epstein properties.
But this reporting suggests these lockers were never searched — raising the possibility that evidence exists outside the universe of what the public has been told investigators “reviewed.”
 |
That’s not “internet theory.” That’s basic investigative reality:
Evidence you don’t seize can’t be authenticated.
Can’t be analyzed.
Can’t be connected.
Can’t be used to charge anyone else.
And the Epstein case — more than almost any case in modern history — has always revolved around a single haunting possibility:
He didn’t do this alone.
This Doesn’t Look Like a Government Trying to Get Answers
Let’s be blunt: when governments are serious about justice, they act like it.
They don’t slow-walk releases, hide evidence, or ignore victims, and 6 storage lockers with pictures, videos, hard drives, and personal notebooks.
They don’t hide behind duplicative document dumps.
They don’t make survivors worry their identities will be exposed while powerful adults remain behind black bars of redaction.
And they sure as hell don’t leave alleged evidence lockers sitting out there like a forgotten footnote.
Which is why this moment feels less like “accountability” and more like a desperate containment strategy.
Not necessarily because there’s a single mastermind in a smoky room — but because the incentives all point one direction:
Limit exposure
Control narratives
Protect institutions
Avoid naming names unless forced
And, conveniently, keep the most damaging material out of public view
The result? A “transparency” regime that looks like it’s curating the truth instead of uncovering it.
The Part Everyone’s Thinking (And Why It’s Not Crazy to Ask)
You’re asking: “Are they hiding hundreds of millions of lines of data, videos, pictures… to protect you-know-who and his friends?”
Here’s what we can responsibly say:
We do have documented, ongoing political conflict over what is being released, what is being redacted, and who gets to view unredacted materials — including reporting that members of Congress were set to view unredacted files in a controlled setting.
We also have the DOJ’s own acknowledgement that its production includes massive volumes of videos and images — which implies the government is sitting on an enormous digital archive that can be selectively released, withheld, or redacted.
And now we have reporting that additional physical caches may exist that were allegedly never searched.
Put that together and you don’t need a tinfoil hat to see why people are furious:
If you genuinely wanted the full story for victims, you’d be moving heaven and earth to secure every possible evidence source.
So when a story breaks about untouched lockers… it doesn’t read like “oops.”
It reads like the same old Epstein pattern:
Power gets protected. Pain gets processed. And the public gets a document dump.
What Needs to Happen Next (If This Is Not a Cover-Up)
If the DOJ/FBI want to end the suspicion — not by PR, but by action — the path is pretty clear:
Confirm whether the storage units exist, where they are, and whether they were searched.
If they weren’t searched, explain why.
If they still exist, secure them immediately and document chain-of-custody.
Allow independent oversight (Congress, inspectors general, courts) rather than forcing “view-only” access behind closed doors.
Center survivors in every decision about privacy and release — because “protecting victims” should never mean “protecting the powerful.”
That’s how you prove you’re seeking truth.
Not with a rolling PDF avalanche.
With warrants, evidence logs, and sunlight.
If They Wanted Answers, They’d Open the Lockers, Talk to Victims.
The Epstein case is already the most infuriating kind of modern scandal: one where the harm is undeniable, the network is implied, and the consequences feel… selectively applied.
Now add this:
There may be rooms no one opened.
Boxes no one inventoried.
Drives no one documented.
Discs no one watched and victims no one has spoken to.
My 20-year-old son asked me a question about the Trump/Epstein Files coverup yeserday:
“Dad, where does this Epstein Files scandal and cover-up rank as far as the worst scandals in your 53 years?”
“There’s no comparison - this is the worst. Several governments, world leaders, and the richest people and families in the world, from the Rothschilds to the Royal Family to Bill Gates to Trump and Clinton. This is the kind of scandal that rearranges history’s deck chairs.” I replied.
If you’re looking for help from either party in getting transparency or a full-throated investigation into the victims, people, and evidence, you’re not going to get it. The Trump Epstein Files Scandal threatens the two most powerful and influential institutions on the planet.
The GOP and The Dems.
Neither party wants the truth because that truth would destroy whatever is left of the influence both parties have, and the reckoning would be permanent for the parties and the people who have institutionalized red and blue as your identity.
And that coordinated cover-up is absolutely part of the strategy to continue to defraud the American people by forcing victims to sit by and watch as both parties feign interest in doing the right thing for the victims by failing to search 6 Epstein storage lockers that we know about, and they didn’t?
PFFFT.
Enjoyed this? Quick ways to help:
• Tap the ♥
• Leave a comment (even a quick “reading!”)
• Restack to Notes
• Forward to a friend who’d like it
• Consider upgrading to paid to support the work
—Dean
| |
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.