Saturday, December 21, 2024

Watchdog Says Dr. Oz Push for 'Medicare Advantage for All' Is Disqualifying CORPORATE MEDIA IS NOT REPORTING MEDICAL FACTS!


MEDICARE ADVANTAGE IS A FOR PROFIT SCAM KNOWN FOR DENYING CARE! 
DR. OZ OWNS STOCK & IS PROMOTING THIS SCAM! 

THE SOLUTION IS MEDICARE FOR ALL! 
IT WOULD REDUCE PROFITS! IT WOULD PROVIDE UNIVERSAL COVERAGE! 

LOOK AROUND! 

THE US IS THE ONLY INDUSTRIALIZED NATION THAT FAILS TO PROVIDE 
UNIVERSAL HEALTH CARE - WE PAID THE PRICE WITH SHORTENED LIFE 
EXPECTANCY & PEOPLE DYING FROM TREATABLE CONDITION....
INCLUDING DIABETES BECAUSE IT ISN'T DIAGNOSED PROMPTLY & INSULIN 
HAS BEEN TOO EXPENSIVE UNTIL PRESIDENT BIDEN & DEMOCRATS 
MANDATED LOWER COSTS.






Fact-checking ‘Wizard of Lies’ attack on Mehmet Oz over ‘miracle’ claims, immigration, his residency



POLITIFACT FACT CHECKING






DR. OZ SPENDS THANKSGIVING SHILLING SUPPLEMENTS FROM COMPANY HE INVESTS IN

Nominated by Trump to oversee Medicare and Medicaid, the celebrity doctor continues to peddle dubious health products








Lies, fraud, conflicts of interest, and bogus science: The real Dr. Oz effect

SCIENCE BASED MEDICINE




The 'Dr. Oz Effect': Senators Scold Mehmet Oz For Diet Scams

Dr. Mehmet Oz, a celebrity doctor who extols weight loss products on his syndicated TV show, got a harsh scolding from several senators Tuesday.
excerpt: 

Oz was held up as the power driving many of the fraudulent ads, even as he argued he was himself the victim of the scammers. The hearing is a follow-up to the Federal Trade Commission’s crackdown last January against fake diet products.

“I don’t get why you need to say this stuff because you know it’s not true,” Missouri Sen. Claire McCaskill, a Democrat who chairs a Senate subcommittee on consumer protection, said at the hearing. “So why, when you have this amazing megaphone…why would you cheapen your show by saying things like that?”




5 Not-So-Miraculous Dr. Oz Claims

 

New Reporting Exposes Dr. Oz as 'Malicious Scam Artist,' 

Says Fetterman




Watchdog Says Dr. Oz Push for 'Medicare Advantage for All' Is Disqualifying

"Oz's deep ties to the private healthcare industry make his nomination to lead our nation's current healthcare system totally egregious," said Public Citizen healthcare advocate Eagan Kemp.

By Jake Johnson


The watchdog group Public Citizen said Thursday that lawmakers should reject President-elect Donald Trump's nomination of Medicare privatization advocate Mehmet Oz to lead a key health agency and instead move toward a publicly run single-payer system that would cover all Americans at a lower cost than the status quo.

In a new brief, Public Citizen warned that Medicare privatization efforts—particularly via an expansion of Medicare Advantage plans run by for-profit insurance companies—would likely "move into overdrive" if the Senate confirms Oz as administrator of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS).

Ahead of his 2022 Senate bid, Oz backed a plan he described as "Medicare Advantage for All," under which privately run plans would cover non-seniors and "all Americans who are not on Medicaid"—effectively eliminating traditional Medicare.

Public Citizen warned such a plan "would mean huge corporate profits while patients continue to struggle to get the healthcare they need," noting that Medicare Advantage plans are notorious for denying necessary care and overbilling the federal government to the tune of tens of billions of dollars per year.

"Policymakers should pass Medicare for All to guarantee care for everyone in the U.S., bring down costs for working families, and generate savings for the country as a whole."

"Further privatizing Medicare would increase healthcare costs systemwide by adding further administrative bloat to our healthcare system," the new brief argues. "Our healthcare system is already made up of thousands of health insurance plans offered by numerous insurers as well as state and federal programs that all play some role in paying for healthcare."

"By spending healthcare resources on corporate profit or administrative waste, privatized Medicare would mean Americans pay even more for healthcare than they already do," the brief adds. "We already spend far more than comparably wealthy countries, over $12,500 per capita, compared with peer nations that are spending around half, per capita."

Oz's plan would also benefit companies in which he has invested tens of millions of dollars, according to financial disclosures.

"Dr. Oz owned between $280,000 and $600,000 in shares in UnitedHealth Group, a major Medicare Advantage insurer, and between $50,000 and $100,000 in shares of CVS Health," Public Citizen noted Thursday, citing the filings.

Eagan Kemp, a healthcare advocate at Public Citizen, said in a statement that Oz's "Medicare Advantage for All" proposal "is dangerous to all patients, especially seniors and people with disabilities, many of whom have not received the care they need under Medicare Advantage."

"Healthcare is a right, not a commodity," said Kemp. "Oz's deep ties to the private healthcare industry make his nomination to lead our nation's current healthcare system totally egregious. Congress should reject Oz's nomination and any proposal to further privatize Medicare."

"Instead," he added, "policymakers should pass Medicare for All to guarantee care for everyone in the U.S., bring down costs for working families, and generate savings for the country as a whole."

Public Citizen's brief came as Oz's nomination faced increasingly close scrutiny from congressional Democrats, who have raised similar concerns about the former television personality's promotion of Medicare Advantage and ties to the private insurance industry.

"As CMS administrator, you would be tasked with overseeing Medicare and ensuring that the tens of millions of seniors that rely on the program receive the care they deserve, including cracking down on abuses by private insurers in Medicare Advantage," a group of Democratic lawmakers led by Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) wrote in a letter to Oz last week. "The consequences of failure on your part would be grave. Billions of federal healthcare dollars—and millions of lives—are at stake."

"Given your financial ties to private insurers, combined with your view that the traditional Medicare program is 'highly dysfunctional' and your advocacy for eliminating it entirely," the lawmakers added, "it is not clear that you are qualified for this critical job."


COMMON DREAMS


No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.

The Smile: 5/15

  Hi friend, Happy Thursday! We're celebrating a major victory in North Carolina, where Justice Allison Riggs was finally sworn in to th...