Sunday, August 30, 2026

SETH MOULTON CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTIONS

           

LOTS OF POSTS IGNORED BY BLOGGER.....

OR REMOVED ON THEIR WHIM!

ALL POSTS ARE AVAILABLE ON

MIDDLEBORO REVIEW AND SO ON

BLOGGER DOESN'T LIKE TRUTH OR FACTS!

BLOGGER DOESN'T LIKE FUND RAISERS AND DELETES

POSTS THAT INCLUDE FUNDRAISING THAT 'VIOLATES THEIR

UNDEFINED COMMUNITY STANDARDS SO ALL 'FUND RAISING'

IS DELETED - CONTRIBUTE AS YOU ARE INCLINED TO SUPPORT

IMPORTANT ISSUES! THESE ARE NOT SOLICITATIONS



SETH MOULTON IS FOR SALE TO HIGHEST BIDDER! 

WIDESPREAD PUBLIC OPPOSITION AGAINST ISRAEL'S GENOCIDE 

AND ETHNIC CLEANSING IS GROWING. 

100 CONGRESS MEMBERS RECENTLY VOTED AGAINST PROVIDING 

WEAPONS TO ISRAEL!  NOT SETH MOULTON!


Seth Moulton

Democrat · Massachusetts · MA-06 · House

 

Seth Moulton

Israel Lobby Total

$93,572

Combined direct contributions, earmarked donations, and independent expenditures from tracked pro-Israel PACs, across all available cycles.

On the 2026 ballot — House seat, MA-06, November 3, 2026 · 65 days away

All 2026 seats →

Seth Moulton AIPAC and pro-Israel lobby record

  • AIPAC PAC and United Democracy Project$49,967
  • Other pro-Israel lobby PACs (J Street, DMFI, RJC and others tracked)$43,605
  • Direct and earmarked contributions$93,572
  • Independent expenditures in support$0
  • Latest filing on record2025-11-19

2026 candidates on file with the FEC — MA-06

Total receipts this cycle per FEC filings, candidates with at least $25,000 on file, as of 2026-08-25. The FEC does not record primary results, so candidates who lost or left a primary may still appear. Pro-Israel PAC totals on this site cover members of Congress only.

Direct & Earmarked

$93,572

Schedule B + earmarked Schedule A

Independent Expenditures

$0

$0 support · $0 oppose

Transactions

148

Itemized FEC filings

Committees

3

Distinct PACs with activity

Spending by Election Cycle

201620182020202220242026$0k$15k$30k$45k$60k

Breakdown by Committee

CommitteeTransactionsTotal
AIPAC PAC78$49,967
J Street PAC69$42,105
JACPAC1$1,500

All Transactions

DateTypeAmountCommitteeDescription
Nov 18, 2025
Direct
-$1,500AIPAC PACVOID: REFUNDED EARMARK OF STEVEN SEGAL
Nov 15, 2025
Direct
-$1AIPAC PACVOID: REFUNDED EARMARK OF ALAN BERLINBERG
Nov 15, 2025
Direct
-$3AIPAC PACVOID: REFUNDED EARMARK OF LOREN BRAUNER
Nov 15, 2025
Direct
-$9AIPAC PACVOID: REFUNDED EARMARK OF BRETT MARZ
Nov 15, 2025
Direct
-$36AIPAC PACVOID: REFUNDED EARMARK OF LANCE KAWESCH
Nov 15, 2025
Direct
-$2AIPAC PACVOID: REFUNDED EARMARK OF MICHAEL ZEMAN
Nov 15, 2025
Direct
-$1,000AIPAC PACVOID: REFUNDED EARMARK OF DAVID GOODTREE
Nov 15, 2025
Direct
-$7,000AIPAC PACVOID: REFUNDED EARMARK OF DIANE EXTER
Nov 15, 2025
Direct
-$1,650AIPAC PACVOID: REFUNDED EARMARK OF MICHAEL GARDNER
Nov 15, 2025
Direct
-$750AIPAC PACVOID: REFUNDED EARMARK OF JEREMY BURTON
Nov 15, 2025
Direct
-$1AIPAC PACVOID: REFUNDED EARMARK OF MARY JANE WANG
Nov 15, 2025
Direct
-$1,800AIPAC PACVOID: REFUNDED EARMARK OF OMRI DAHAN
Nov 15, 2025
Direct
-$3,300AIPAC PACVOID: REFUNDED EARMARK OF MARK RUBIN
Nov 15, 2025
Direct
-$1,650AIPAC PACVOID: REFUNDED EARMARK OF FARDAD MONEMPOUR
Nov 15, 2025
Direct
-$7,000AIPAC PACVOID: REFUNDED EARMARK OF NEIL EXTER
Nov 15, 2025
Direct
-$1,650AIPAC PACVOID: REFUNDED EARMARK OF OREN HIRSCH
Nov 15, 2025
Direct
-$1,650AIPAC PACVOID: REFUNDED EARMARK OF STEVEN KUPFERMAN
Nov 15, 2025
Direct
-$1,650AIPAC PACVOID: REFUNDED EARMARK OF JOSHUA KATZIN
Nov 15, 2025
Direct
-$1,650AIPAC PACVOID: REFUNDED EARMARK OF JONATHAN KAGAN
Oct 28, 2025
Earmarked
-$1,650AIPAC PACVOID: REFUNDED EARMARK OF ARYEH GOLDBERG
Oct 26, 2025
Earmarked
-$1,000AIPAC PACVOID: REFUNDED EARMARK OF CHARLES MYERS
Oct 14, 2025
Earmarked
$3AIPAC PACEARMARK OF LOREN BRAUNER
Oct 7, 2025
Earmarked
$750AIPAC PACEARMARK OF JEREMY BURTON
Oct 7, 2025
Earmarked
$1AIPAC PACEARMARK OF ALAN BERLINBERG
Aug 26, 2025
Earmarked
$36AIPAC PACEARMARK OF LANCE KAWESCH

Source: FEC filings (Schedules A, B & E). Negative amounts reflect amended or refunded filings. Independent expenditures are spent for or against a candidate by super PACs, not given to the campaign.

Frequently asked

Does Seth Moulton take AIPAC money?

Yes. Seth Moulton (Democrat, MA-06) has received $49,967 from AIPAC PAC and its super PAC, United Democracy Project, and $93,572 in total from the pro-Israel committees tracked here, based on Federal Election Commission filings. That figure combines direct campaign contributions, earmarked individual contributions, and independent expenditures spent in support of Seth Moulton.

How much pro-Israel PAC money has Seth Moulton received?

$93,572 in total across every election cycle we track, net of refunds and amended filings. Amounts spent against a candidate by super PACs are excluded from this total.

Where does this funding data come from?

All figures come from public Federal Election Commission filings — direct contributions (Schedule B), earmarked individual contributions (Schedule A), and independent expenditures (Schedule E) — across more than 50 tracked pro-Israel committees including AIPAC PAC, United Democracy Project, DMFI PAC, NORPAC, and Pro-Israel America PAC. The database syncs weekly.

Did AIPAC or its super PACs spend money in Seth Moulton's races?

Not through independent expenditures. Seth Moulton's $93,572 total comes from direct and earmarked contributions; we have no super PAC independent-expenditure spending on record in Seth Moulton's races.

Is Seth Moulton up for re-election in 2026?

Seth Moulton's House seat (MA-06) is on the ballot in the November 3, 2026 general election. Every House seat and 35 Senate seats are decided in 2026. Pro-Israel PACs have $93,572 on record in support of Seth Moulton across all tracked cycles.

WHOFUNDSMYREP.COM 

 

OPEN SECRETS HAS PROVIDED A DETAILED REPORT WORTH REVIEWING:

 OPEN SECRETS: SETH MOULTON


Industries

Industries that have contributed to this member

Top 5 Contributing Industries

 

Campaign Committee Contribution Sources, 2025-2026



  • Large Individual Contributions$5,267,80985.38%
  • Small Individual Contributions (< $200)$585,7159.49%
  • PAC Contributions$225,2003.65%
  • Other$91,4681.48%
  • Candidate Self-financing$00.00%

 JUST THE 1ST PAGE: 


PACs, 2025-2026

PAC contributors to the candidate are listed below. Click the arrows to sort the list by alphabetical order or by total amount of contributions.






SETH MOULTON BETRAYED THE PUBLIC TRUST! INSIDER TRADING AND CONCEALED REPORTING! ATTACKED TRANS PEOPLE!

          

LOTS OF POSTS IGNORED BY BLOGGER.....

OR REMOVED ON THEIR WHIM!

ALL POSTS ARE AVAILABLE ON

MIDDLEBORO REVIEW AND SO ON

BLOGGER DOESN'T LIKE TRUTH OR FACTS!

BLOGGER DOESN'T LIKE FUND RAISERS AND DELETES

POSTS THAT INCLUDE FUNDRAISING THAT 'VIOLATES THEIR

UNDEFINED COMMUNITY STANDARDS SO ALL 'FUND RAISING'

IS DELETED - CONTRIBUTE AS YOU ARE INCLINED TO SUPPORT

IMPORTANT ISSUES! THESE ARE NOT SOLICITATIONS




A new WBUR report published today sheds troubling new light on Congressman Seth Moulton's financial interests and raises serious questions about why he has spent months delaying the release of information Massachusetts voters deserve to see before they cast their ballots.


The report details how Moulton accumulated private stakes worth between $1 million - $5 million in companies tied to the defense sector while serving on the House Armed Services Committee – the very committee responsible for overseeing the industry and approving policies and spending that directly affect it. These were not ordinary investments available to the public. They were exclusive private deals that generated extraordinary returns while Moulton sat in a position of public trust.



Just as striking is Moulton's sudden reversal.


Congressman Moulton began investing in these companies in 2021 and continued doing so for years while serving on the committee responsible for overseeing the industry in which they operate. During that time, he showed little interest in addressing the obvious questions these investments raised. It wasn't until he began gearing up for a Senate campaign that he publicly commented on them, and even then his response was to defend the practice. In a September 2025 statement, he declared that he “cannot recuse myself from my constitutional duty to vote on matters coming before the House.”


Only now, after reporters began asking questions and voters began paying attention, has Moulton reversed course. His campaign says he will place the assets in a blind trust and recuse himself from votes affecting those companies. After years of deflecting and then defending these investments, it's fair to ask why now?



The investments didn't change. The committee didn't change. The only thing that changed is that Seth Moulton is now running for Senate.

That is what makes this episode so troubling. A member of Congress charged with overseeing the defense industry participated in exclusive private investment opportunities tied to that same industry, defended those arrangements for years, and only moved to address the issue after it became a public controversy.


Yet voters still do not know the full extent of Moulton's financial interests. He has delayed filing both his financial disclosure report and tax returns, leaving Massachusetts voters without information they should have before they begin casting ballots.


Public trust is built on transparency and accountability. It requires leaders to confront potential conflicts of interests before they become public controversies, not scramble to address them after they've been uncovered. Better yet, it requires the judgment to avoid those conflicts altogether and the integrity to hold oneself to the highest standards the public deserves.


At every step, Congressman Moulton's response has followed the same pattern: deny there is a problem, delay transparency, and change course only when public pressure becomes impossible to ignore. That may be a political strategy, but it is not the standard Massachusetts voters should expect from someone seeking a seat in the United States Senate.


The people of Massachusetts deserve better.


FROM THE DOWNBALLOT:

Morning Digest: Centrist congressman launches primary challenge against prominent liberal senator

Seth Moulton says Ed Markey is "too old" to run again, but will primary voters prioritize generational change over ideology?



Massachusetts Rep. Seth Moulton (D), at left (credit: Seth Moulton Facebook)

Leading Off

MA-Sen

Democratic Rep. Seth Moulton kicked off a primary challenge to Sen. Ed Markey on Wednesday, explicitly painting the long-time incumbent as “too old” in comments to the Washington Post.

Markey, 79, has served in Congress since winning a House seat in 1976, though it wasn’t until 2013 that he earned a promotion to the upper chamber in a special election to replace John Kerry, who resigned to become Barack Obama’s secretary of state.

During his long career, Markey has established himself as an outspoken liberal and has focused heavily on combating climate change. While he’s seldom faced difficult reelection campaigns, he turned back another primary challenger five years ago when he defeated Rep. Joseph P. Kennedy by a 55-45 margin.

Like Moulton, who is 46, the much younger Kennedy (at the time 39) presented himself as an agent of generational change. But despite his famous name, Kennedy struggled to match Markey’s liberal bona fides and his support from figures like New York Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and a host of the best-known progressive organizations.

It’s a problem the centrist Moulton will face as well. Moulton, a Marine veteran, first won Massachusetts’ 6th Congressional District by knocking off a tarnished Democratic incumbent, John Tierney. His subsequent attempts to take on much bigger targets, however, have fallen well short.

After Democrats regained the House in 2018, Moulton led an ill-fated plot to stop Nancy Pelosi from once again becoming speaker. After that gambit failed (Moulton even wound up voting for Pelosi to reclaim her old job), he then sought to run for president. After a desultory few months in which he didn’t qualify for any debates, he abandoned ship.

In announcing his latest bid, Moulton leaned heavily into the age gap between the two candidates in his launch video.

“We’re in a crisis, and with everything we learned last election, I just don’t believe Sen. Markey should be running for another six-year term at 80 years old,” he said. “Even more, I don’t think someone who’s been in Congress for half a century is the right person to meet this moment and win the future.” (Markey will turn 80 next year.)

But Moulton’s more moderate record may not appeal to primary voters. In particular, he generated a firestorm of criticism from fellow Democrats shortly after last year’s presidential election when he expressed his opposition to allowing transgender kids to play in girls’ sports—and hostility toward his party for allegedly suppressing such views.

“Democrats spend way too much time trying not to offend anyone rather than being brutally honest about the challenges many Americans face,” he told the New York Times. “I have two little girls, I don’t want them getting run over on a playing field by a male or formerly male athlete, but as a Democrat I’m supposed to be afraid to say that.”

Despite the hostile response, which included the resignation of a top aide, Moulton remained defiant, declaring, “The backlash proves my point.” He also dared his critics to challenge him at the ballot box, saying, “Good luck, I mean, run against me if you want.”

Now, before a much larger electorate, those critics will get the chance to unite against him.


SETH MOULTON:

Pride-goers boo Democrat who tried to blame 2024 election loss on trans kids in sports

Rep. Seth Moulton says he stands by comments on trans athletes, calls Democrats "out of touch"

excerpt: 

BOSTON - Rep. Seth Moulton is defending controversial remarks that he made about transgender athletes in the wake of the presidential election.

President-elect Donald Trump's campaign spent millions on anti-trans political ads this fall. The Massachusetts Congressman told The New York Times after Trump's win that "Democrats spend way too much time trying not to offend anyone" and called for a new approach from the party on the transgender issues.

"I have two little girls, I don't want them getting run over on a playing field by a male or formerly male athlete, but as a Democrat I'm supposed to be afraid to say that," Moulton told The Times.

The Boston Globe reported that a top aide to Moulton resigned after his comments appeared in The Times, and there were protests outside his Salem office. 

CBS NEWS




Fetterman texts appear to show lack of interest in duties as senator

                                                                              LOTS OF POSTS IGNORED BY BLOGGER..... OR REMOVED ON THEIR WHIM...