Showing posts with label PRIMARY VOTING. Show all posts
Showing posts with label PRIMARY VOTING. Show all posts

Saturday, August 10, 2024

NEMASKET NEWS -- MIDDLEBORO, LAKEVILLE PRIMARY VOTING AND MORE...

CHECK OUT NEMASKET NEWS ON LINE

Virtual candidates forum for state senate race to be held

Aug 6, 2024

Event Date: 

Thursday, August 29, 2024 - 8:30am

A virtual forum to meet the candidates in a local race for state senate will be held at the end of August.

The forum for candidates running for the 3rd Bristol & Plymouth District state senate seat will be Thursday, Aug. 29 at 8:30 a.m. via Zoom.

Candidates Jim Dupont (independent), Joseph Pacheco (Democrat), Barry Sanders (Democrat) and Kelly Dooner (Republican) will participate.

Marc Pacheco currently holds the seat but announced earlier this year he would not run for re-election, after serving as state senator for more than three decades.

The forum is presented by the Cranberry Country Chamber of Commerce, Cape Cod Canal Region Chamber of Commerce and Taunton Area Chamber of Commerce.

Register at cranberrycountry.org/events.

Event Date: 

Thursday, August 29, 2024 - 8:30am





Everything you need to know about state primaries in Middleboro, Lakeville

Aug 9, 2024

Middleboro voters will see two contested races in the upcoming primary election on Tuesday, Sept. 3. 

Two candidates will compete in the Democratic primary for the 3rd Bristol and Plymouth Senate Seat. The seat is currently held by long-time Senator Marc Pacheco, who decided in February not to run for re-election

Meanwhile, Representative Susan Williams Gifford will face a challenger in the Republican primary for the 2nd Plymouth seat in the House of Representatives. 

Senate. Sen. Marc Pacheco served four years in the House of Representatives and 32 in the Senate, which has earned him the title of the Massachusetts Senate’s longest continuously serving member. 

He said he reevaluates every year whether he wants to run again, and felt that with this being a national election year, it was the right time to make a change. 

As the long-time senator takes his exit, a hotly contested race to replace him has begun. 

Joe Pacheco, of no relation to Marc Pacheco, and Barry Sanders are both seeking the Democratic nomination for the race. Kelly Dooner is running on the Republican line, and Jim DuPont is running as an Independent. 

Joe Pacheco has experience in multiple levels of government. He served as a Raynham Select Board member for 17 years, spent five years working in the state legislature, including one working for Senator Marc Pacheco and five years working in the state executive branch. 

As a result of his legislative experience, he said, “on day one, I can be filing legislation and advocating for the interests of the district.” 

Sanders, who describes himself as “a dad, social worker and Taunton City councilor,” said he got in the race to stand for transparency and accountability in state government and to put his constituents over politics. 

He points to his 35 years of experience as a social worker as a key part of what will make him an effective senator. 

While Senator Marc Pacheco and Joe Pacheco are not related, the former has endorsed the latter as his replacement. 

House of Representatives. Representative Susan Williams Gifford, the incumbent in the 2nd Plymouth District, will face a Republican challenger, John Gaskey, in the race to retain her seat. No Democratic or Independent candidates have entered the race. 

Gifford was elected to the House in 2002. 

“People want a representative who will spend tax dollars wisely and make sure government lives within its means just like you or I have to,” said Gifford. 

“Over the years, I have made one promise to the people of the second Plymouth district: I will represent you to the best of my ability.”

Gaskey is a 23-year veteran of the Coast Guard who has worked since his retirement in the medical field. 

“I’ve been very upset with a lot of the legislation that has come out in the last cycle,” said Gaskey, explaining his decision to run. Specifically, he opposes the state’s latest gun control bill and the funding of shelter for “illegal” immigrants ahead of veterans and the Commonwealth’s citizens. 

A virtual forum to meet the candidates in the Senate race will be held on Thursday, Aug. 29 with Joe Pacheco, Sanders, Dooner and DuPont all participating. 

It will take place over zoom at 8:30 a.m. Visit cranberrycountry.org/events to register. 

First Bristol and Plymouth district Senator Michael Rodrigues (D), who represents Lakeville, Freetown, Rochester, Somerset, Swansea, Westport and Fall River is running unopposed in the 2024 state primary. Rodrigues has held a senate seat since 2010 and serves as the Chair of the Senate Committee on Ways and Means. 

Incumbent Norman Orrall (R) is running opposed to retain his seat as the 12th Bristol district representative, which includes Middleboro and Lakeville. Orrall has occupied the seat since 2018. A lifelong resident of Lakeville, Orrall previously served as Lakeville’s town moderator and member of the Finance Committee before being elected into the House of Representatives. 

Early voter registration deadline for both Middleboro and Lakeville voters is Saturday, Aug. 24. 

Lakeville early voting will take place at the Lakeville Public Library, 4 Precinct St, Lakeville. Dates and times are as follows:

Saturday, Aug. 24      9 a.m. to 3 p.m.

Sunday, Aug. 25        No Early Voting

Monday, Aug. 26       8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.

Tuesday, Aug. 27       8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.

Wednesday, Aug. 28  8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.

Thursday, Aug. 29     8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.

Friday, Aug. 30         8 a.m. to 12 p.m. (last day)

Middleboro early voting will take place at the Middleboro Town Hall, 10 Nickerson Ave. Dates and times are as follows:

Saturday, August 24 9:00 AM - 3:00 PM

Monday, August 26 8:00 AM - 6:00 PM

Tuesday, August 27 8:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Wednesday, August 28 8:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Thursday, August 29 8:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Friday, August 30 8:00 AM - 12:00 PM

Election day voting locations for Middleboro and Lakeville are as follows. Polls will be open from 8 a.m. to 7 p.m. 

Middleboro. Precinct 1 Oak Point Club House, 202 Oak Point Drive. Precincts 2, 4, 6 Middleboro High School, 71 East Grove Street. Precinct 3 South Middleboro Fire Station, 566 Wareham Street. Precinct 5, 5A Council on Aging, 558 Plymouth Street. Precinct 7, 7A John T. Nichols, Jr. Middle School, 112 Tiger Drive. 

Lakeville: Precincts 1, 2 and 3 at Ted Williams Camp, Loon Pond Lodge, 28 Precinct Street, Lakeville, MA 02347


 NEMASKET NEWS




Middleboro lobbies for new skate park

Aug 8, 2024

MIDDLEBORO — As evidenced by the vegetation-filled cracks in its surface, the portions of collapsed fencing and its rusted ramps, Middleboro’s skate park is due for an upgrade – and the town is well aware. 

Middleboro has applied for the Commonwealth of Massachusetts Parkland Acquisition and Renovation for Communities grant to renovate the skate park located next to the recently refurbished Peirce Playground.

The grant, which the town applied for in July, would fund a two-year project to design and construct a new skate park at its existing location, according to Grant Writer Stephanie Hall.  

Since 2020, a group of residents whose parents were involved in the development of the existing skatepark, has been pushing to renovate the skatepark, Hall said. 

The skatepark was built on old tennis courts over 20 years ago with components borrowed from another town facility and hasn’t been renovated since, said Hall. 

The proposal for the new facility features a fully-integrated design with concrete components that would mirror what other towns in the region have constructed in recent years. 

This design would make the park accessible not only to skateboarders but also skaters or bikers, Hall said.

Thirteen-year-old Sam America, who has come to the skatepark since she was four years old, would like to have a not-so-bumpy surface to cruise around with her scooter on. 

Her other wishes for the project are safer jumps and the installation of a no-smoking sign, she said. 

Safety is a top priority for Sam’s father, Donald McLellan, who described the conditions of the current facility as “very dangerous.”

The number of kids “flying through” the park on electric bikes makes it even more unsafe, he said. “I’ve almost seen multiple accidents and many kids get hurt.” 

McLellan recommended the new park have one-way lanes to avoid collisions. 

Kason Curry, who frequents the skate park, remembered when he almost went home with a chipped tooth after the wheel of his scooter got stuck in a crack and he ended up face down on the ground. 

Fixing the cracks, new ramps and a bigger facility were his recommendations for the upgrade. 

The grant would provide $495,000 in funding towards the project, but the renovation would cost an estimated $750,000 in total, according to Hall. 

The hope is to cover the remaining $255,000 through additional grants as the project is not within this year’s budget, said Town Manager Jay McGrail.

The town will likely find out whether it has been approved for the grant by the fall, said Hall, who noted “it’s a very competitive process.” 

If the town’s application is denied, “we’ll try and get creative with funding options,” said McGrail. 

“We’re really excited about the project and the town is invested in trying to see it through,” he said.  

His goal is to make the recreational complex that includes the skate park and updated playground “a destination for all ages and residents of the town,” he said. 

McLellan is also an advocate for a facility accessible to all ages. “If they had a skate park with a little kids section and a big kids section, I think that would be great.” 


NEMASKET NEWS


Tax financing agreement on $33 million project may go to voters

Aug 5, 2024

MIDDLEBORO — Voters at the Special Fall Town Meeting on Oct. 7 will likely be asked to approve a tax agreement with a manufacturing company looking to relocate to Middleboro and construct a $33 million facility on West Grove Street.

Representatives from Rexa, a manufacturer of electrohydraulic actuators now based in West Bridgewater, appeared before the select board Monday, Aug. 5 to discuss their plans for the site. The company has clients throughout the country and internationally, Director of Finance Kenneth Garron said. Electrohydraulic actuators are a type of hydraulic system that includes their own pumps. 

Company officials also discussed their request for a TIF, which stands for Tax Increment Financing, that would provide a discount on future taxes for a period from five to 20 years.

The details of the agreement have not yet been finalized, but Town Manager James McGrail said after the meeting that the town is “ninety percent there’’ in making a determination on how much tax in incentives to offer. The amount can range from 1 to 100 percent, according to state regulations.

The company hopes to build an estimated 110,000 square foot building for corporate headquarters and manufacturing operations. The project cost is estimated at $33 million, including $7 million for land purchase, $20 million for hard and soft construction costs and $6 million for personal property costs.

Due to increased customer demand, the company needed to increase its real estate footprint, according to material presented by Rexa officials.

“This is a big project for us,’’ Garron said. “We’re looking at how to make the opportunity viable for us.’’

The company plans to create 25 new, permanent full-time jobs at the new location, in addition to the 100 full-time positions that will be retained. The company plans to give priority to qualified Middleboro residents for new jobs, Garron said.

Select Board Member Thomas White said he supported the preference to town residents and would make sure the company adhered to that commitment.

Rexa officials estimated that the company and its employees would spend about $1 million in town on various providers, including restaurants and catering, retail establishments, hotels, recreation and corporate and industrial services.

Garron said the company has a track record of supporting community non-profit organizations.

In response to a resident’s question, Garron said the truck traffic generated by the business would be “minimal,’’ which he estimated at about five to ten trucks a day, because the facility is used for manufacturing and is not a distribution site.

Select Board Member Brian Giovanoni described the project as “smart growth,’’ noting that, unlike with residential developments, a manufacturing facility would not add students to the town’s school system, which can be costly for taxpayers.

Select Board Chair Mark Germain said he planned to support the project.

NEMASKET NEWS


Planning board ‘unenthusiastically’ proposes zoning to comply with MBTA mandate

Aug 6, 2024

MIDDLEBORO – Planning board chair Allin Frawley supported a new zoning overlay that would comply with Massachusetts Bay Transit Authority multi-family housing guidelines “as unenthusiastically” as he possibly could in a Tuesday, Aug. 6 meeting of the Middleboro Planning Board.

Frawley, along with other members of the Planning Board and Director of Planning and Community Development Leeann Bradley, voiced their strong opposition to the MBTA housing guidelines while also presenting a plan to comply with the mandate.

The state has mandated that towns designated as “MBTA communities,” like Middleboro, should have at least one zoning district that allows multi-family housing as a right, which gives the town little say about potential requirements.

The mandate requires housing developments consisting of at least 15 units per acre to be allowed within a half mile of the MBTA station at 161 South Main St.

According to Bradley, the town is “creating an overlay to comply with the mandate that will be zoned for 1,471 units of multi-family [and] family-friendly [housing].”

The overlay will include parcels that have existing multi-family complexes along Route 28 as well as the town’s already existing 40R housing districts.

Chapter 40R districts are special zoning areas that allow for the construction of high-density housing while giving town officials more say in how it’s done.

Bradley explained that this type of zoning overlay is what other MBTA Communities are calling “paper compliance.”

“It’s already developed land, it’s already multi-family” she said.

Bradley added that the town “wouldn’t be changing our zoning if we weren’t mandated to do so.”

Bradley said she has “the fear” that if the town complies with this state mandate, other mandates could be coming down the pipeline.

“As a premise, I don’t like having to change our zoning because the state is telling us to,” said Bradley. “But if we don’t [comply] we lose funding to three major types of grants … and 13 other discretionary grants.”

One example of a discretionary grant, said Bradley, is the state’s Municipal Vulnerability Preparedness Program grant. This year, the town received $170,000 from that grant to help with the design of downtown Middleboro’s School Street parking lot, she said.

“We’ll be losing a lot of money if we don’t comply with the mandate,” she said. “It’s not my favorite thing.”

“I’m absolutely opposed to the mandate,” said Frawley.

Bradley also said she worries that MBTA multi-family housing guidelines – which are based on a percentage of a town’s population – may change over time as Middleboro’s population naturally increases.

“It seems like in maybe 20 years, 30 years, the whole town [could] be zoned as by-right multi-family,” she said.

“This is all based on a train station nobody asked us about,” added Frawley.

According to Bradley, the town is already “doing a great job with housing” with affordable housing levels “far above” most towns.

This new proposed zoning overlay will be put in front of voters at Middleboro’s next Town Meeting.

If the zoning overlay does not pass through Town Meeting, then Middleboro will be non-compliant with the state mandate, explained Bradley.

“We have to bring it back to Town Meeting … until it passes,” she said. “We’re not responsible for how individuals vote at Town Meeting.”

The Planning Board will hold a public hearing on Tuesday, Sept. 17, said Bradley. “I’d like to do some more outreach to try and spark some interest with the public.”


NEWMASKET NEWS

Wednesday, December 7, 2022

FOCUS: Faiz Shakir | Biden Is Putting South Carolina First. I Won't Vote for That.

 

 

Reader Supported News
06 December 22

Live on the homepage now!
Reader Supported News

OFF TO A BAD START ON FUNDRAISING — So far for the month 28 people have stepped up and made contributions. We sincerely appreciate the effort of those donors but is a very slow start. The magic number is about 700 (total donations for the drive) to complete it. We are a long way from that. Please take funding seriously, we can’t accomplish anything without it.
Marc Ash • Founder, Reader Supported News

Sure, I'll make a donation!

 

Voting was held at a high school in Charleston, S.C., during the 2020 Democratic primary. (photo: Hilary Swift/The New York Times)
FOCUS: Faiz Shakir | Biden Is Putting South Carolina First. I Won't Vote for That.
Faiz Shakir, The New York Times
Shakir writes: "President Biden's three-part plan to reform the Democratic presidential primary calendar was almost a home run - save for one flaw that dooms it entirely."


President Biden’s three-part plan to reform the Democratic presidential primary calendar was almost a home run — save for one flaw that dooms it entirely.


Our party’s lineup of states that nominate our presidential candidates every four years needs to change badly. The 2020 caucuses in Iowa — the state that has been first on the calendar for decades — were a disaster. But even more so, the sequencing of states must be transformed if we’re going to achieve the most important goal of the nominating process: to pick the strongest possible candidate to put before a national audience and to do so strategically in states that we must win in the general election.

The process should also mirror the democratic ideals underpinning our political system and the Democratic Party — grass-roots civic engagement through representative democracy. Candidates should be compelled to talk to ordinary Americans in conversational settings and persuasively earn their support. And the process needs to reflect the reality of the calendar, which exerts enormous influence on the kinds of candidates that parties select and on where they spend staggering resources.

Mr. Biden and the Democrats tasked with changing the calendar have made three central decisions in their proposal, which party officials unveiled last week and will move through a series of procedural steps and votes this winter and would require the cooperation of states chosen to go early. The first is that the Iowa caucus would no longer begin the process. This is the correct decision.

Being first is a special privilege, and Iowa must be held accountable. Accountability can be a tough pill to swallow; by definition, accountability requires a penalty for wrongdoing.

Since the 1970s, Iowa, the state famous for its unique town-meeting-style caucuses, has had the honor of being the first to register its recommendation for the Democratic nominee for president. Yet on Feb. 3, 2020, as the campaign manager for Bernie Sanders, I witnessed a historic travesty of election justice as Iowa’s Democratic Party-led caucus failed to do the one thing it absolutely had to do: count votes and declare an outcome. The state party was unable to report a winner on caucus night (and for many nights thereafter), overrelying on a faulty mobile app and subsequently pointing fingers at others for its own faults.

In Iowa alone, the Sanders campaign spent millions of dollars on ads and office rentals and hired the largest field staff of any campaign. We made a huge investment in trying to ensure Mr. Sanders would win the state, but its process failed us on election night — and the other Democratic candidates. Iowa failed the country; because it couldn’t make elemental democracy work, it embarrassed a party that was trying to defeat Donald Trump by appealing to democratic foundations and principles. And most unfortunately, Iowa failed its own residents, who cycle after cycle had shown an incredible seriousness of purpose in fulfilling their unique role to choose a president. Iowans, more than people in any other state, were comfortable attending numerous campaign events, fielding door knocks and phone calls from strangers day after day and being immersed in a highly charged political atmosphere for what seemed like an eternity.

Iowans have had a proud caucus history of supporting upstart challengers who took on the status quo establishment, igniting the campaigns of outsider candidates like Mr. Sanders, Barack Obama and Jimmy Carter. Progressives performed well in the state, in part because Iowans engaged deeply in getting to know the candidates and the arguments that they were making. Iowans seem almost intrinsically averse to having elite opinion instruct them on the way to vote. For their part, the good people of Iowa did nothing to earn this sanction, and I mourn for them. We should only hope that their model of civic engagement will be heeded by the voters in the states that now have the opportunity to lead the nation.

But there’s another reason moving on from Iowa is the correct decision, and it dovetails with the second major, correct change Mr. Biden has proposed. The calendar makes the brilliant and important reform of elevating general election battleground states.

Nevada, New Hampshire, Georgia and then Michigan would all hold early February elections to help narrow and winnow the Democratic field. All four of these states have the distinction of being among the 10 closest states in the 2020 presidential election.

Why does it matter that general election battlegrounds are placed so early in the process? This is a Democratic team effort to invest in voter outreach, voter contact and voter enthusiasm at a much earlier stage, for a longer period, with more resources. The icing on the cake just happens to be that those battleground primary voters also get to select the nominee they think could best win their critical state in November.

The ultimate goal of this process is to win; the Biden reform proposal honors that by moving these four key states, from different regions of the country with their collectively diverse electorates, to the front of the line. And if that’s all it did, we could wrap up this essay here and declare victory.

But the Biden nomination calendar contains a fundamental, dooming flaw: the replacement of Iowa with South Carolina as the first state. The change would be comical if it weren’t tragic.

We all know why South Carolina got the nod. President Biden, Representative Jim Clyburn and many of his top supporters were buoyed by their campaign’s comeback in February 2020 when the state delivered Mr. Biden his first victory of the season — and a big one at that. The media attention from that victory, and the consolidation of the Democratic field that it yielded, helped catapult him to winning a majority of the following Super Tuesday states. And when Covid spread through the nation shortly after, the rest of the primary contests were effectively quarantined, and Mr. Biden iced his victory. None of that story is a reason to put South Carolina first, however.

South Carolina is not a battleground state: Mr. Trump carried it by double digits in 2020. It is way more ideologically and culturally conservative than our party and our nation. And the state is not trending in any way toward the Democratic Party. Just two years ago, we witnessed Jaime Harrison — now the chair of the Democratic National Committee — spend the eye-popping sum of $130 million to try to defeat Senator Lindsey Graham. After outraising and outspending Mr. Graham, Mr. Harrison still lost the 2020 Senate race decisively. Let’s not compel all other Democratic campaigns to waste more money that could be better spent elsewhere. If we really want to pick a diverse primary electorate, look to South Carolina’s neighbor to the north — an actual battleground state.

It bears repeating: Being first is a special honor. The state chosen for the task is rewarded in myriad ways. Iowa’s economy has benefited greatly over the years from the high level of campaign spending and travel. Aware of the process’s economic power, many of our Democratic campaigns employed union-friendly hotels, restaurants and vendors when we were active in Iowa. Good luck finding that in South Carolina, one of the fiercest anti-union, anti-labor states in the country. In fact, South Carolina is already first in the nation at something that it shouldn’t be proud of; it is the lowest-density union state in America. It should thus never be in contention to be first on our calendar.

As a D.N.C. delegate, I get to vote on the reform plan. As long as South Carolina remains first, I will vote no. I will urge other delegates to do the same. Let’s honor the principal goal of the primary calendar: to pick strong Democratic nominees who best represent our values and our principles. We’re so close to getting this right; let’s fix it.


READ MORE

 

Contribute to RSN

Follow us on facebook and twitter!

Update My Monthly Donation

PO Box 2043 / Citrus Heights, CA 95611






Trump gives DISASTER SPEECH before SILENT CROWD…in PHOENIX!!

                                      LOTS OF POSTS IGNORED BY BLOGGER..... OR REMOVED ON THEIR WHIM! ALL POSTS ARE AVAILABLE ON MIDDLEBORO ...