LOTS OF POSTS IGNORED BY BLOGGER.....
ALL POSTS ARE AVAILABLE ON
MIDDLEBORO REVIEW AND SO ON
 |
America the Dangerous
How violence at home and belligerence abroad is defining Trump’s second term.
There is a temptation, when living through political decay, to believe that the worst moment has already passed. That instinct has repeatedly failed during Donald Trump’s second term. What is happening now—on American streets and on the international stage—suggests not a peak of chaos but a normalization of menace. The United States is no longer merely polarized or dysfunctional. It is increasingly violent, unaccountable, and reckless, and it is behaving like a country that has lost both moral authority and self-control.
Start at home. In 2026, Immigration and Customs Enforcement has become something closer to a roaming domestic security force than a civilian law enforcement agency. Eight people have died in encounters with ICE this year alone. Among them were Alex Pretti and Renee Nicole Good, both Minneapolis residents, killed in separate incidents less than three weeks apart. These were not secretive or ambiguous events. They happened in public, were recorded, and were followed by a state-sponsored smear campaign against the dead.
Video evidence showed Pretti holding a phone when he was shot. That did not stop senior administration figures from labeling him a terrorist, an assassin, a mortal threat to law enforcement. The implication was clear: the killing required no justification beyond the assertion of federal authority. Reality was optional. Only after public outrage and polling data began to turn did the White House soften its tone, quietly retreating from the most inflammatory claims while refusing to accept responsibility.
This is now the pattern. First, violence. Then, denial. Then, a minor rhetorical adjustment designed not to change policy, but to stabilize public opinion. Trump himself offered a masterclass in this approach, calling Pretti’s killing “unfortunate” while simultaneously implying that he was at fault simply for possessing a gun—an astonishing claim in a country whose political right has spent decades insisting that gun ownership is an inviolable liberty. Apparently, that liberty evaporates the moment the wrong federal agency takes interest in you.
The hypocrisy would be almost impressive if it weren’t lethal. MAGA Republicans who still celebrate Kyle Rittenhouse as a folk hero now argue that a registered nurse holding a phone deserved to die because agents felt threatened. This is not a legal argument. It is an assertion of power: the state decides who is entitled to rights, and who is entitled to a bullet.
Public patience is wearing thin. Polls show a majority of Americans believe ICE has gone too far, and even Republican lawmakers have begun to express unease. When Fox News runs headlines about slipping support for immigration enforcement, the problem is no longer partisan optics—it is legitimacy. The administration’s response has been cosmetic. One aggressive official is removed, another even more explicit hardliner takes his place. The deportation machine remains the point.
If this sounds familiar, it should. The logic governing domestic policy now mirrors the logic driving U.S. foreign policy: escalate, threaten, dominate, deny. Nowhere is this clearer than in the administration’s posture toward Iran. At a moment when domestic outrage is mounting over federal agents killing civilians, Trump has chosen to brandish aircraft carriers and issue public ultimatums, promising “speed and violence” if Tehran does not submit.
This is not diplomacy. It is extortion performed on a global stage.
The danger is not hypothetical. Tens of thousands of U.S. troops are stationed within range of Iranian missiles. Regional allies are terrified of reprisals. European diplomats are bracing for a crisis that could ignite with a single miscalculation. Iran, weakened but not powerless, has made clear that any American strike would be treated as the beginning of a war, not a limited action.
The administration appears undeterred by history. Iran’s reminders of America’s catastrophic wars in Afghanistan and Iraq—trillions wasted, thousands of American lives lost, entire regions destabilized—are dismissed as background noise. Once again, Washington seems convinced that overwhelming force will produce submission rather than chaos, despite decades of evidence to the contrary.
It is hard to ignore the timing. As criticism grows at home over ICE shootings and unchecked federal power, the White House suddenly discovers an urgent foreign threat. This is an old maneuver: when legitimacy erodes domestically, manufacture confrontation abroad. Rally the flag. Change the subject. The problem, as always, is that wars are not press releases. They do not stay contained within the narrative that launched them.
What ties all of this together—Minneapolis and Tehran, ICE raids and carrier strike groups—is a governing philosophy that treats force as the primary language of politics. Immigration becomes a war zone. Protest becomes terrorism. Negotiation becomes capitulation. In this worldview, accountability is weakness, restraint is betrayal, and cruelty is rebranded as strength.
The result is a country that is increasingly feared rather than respected, both by its own citizens and by the rest of the world. Once seen, however naively, as a stabilizing partner, the United States is now widely distrusted by former allies and increasingly regarded as a pariah state—unpredictable, volatile, and dangerous to global stability. At home, federal agents kill with impunity. Abroad, the president threatens annihilation through social media posts.
This is not what strength looks like. It is what decay looks like when it acquires weapons, uniforms, and a sense of righteousness. And unless it is confronted, it will not stop with a handful of shootings or another “near miss” war. It will continue until the cost—human, political, and moral—becomes impossible to ignore.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.