Sunday, May 10, 2026

Norwood Hospital was done in by inadequate state regulations. Here is the fix.

                                                      

 LOTS OF POSTS IGNORED BY BLOGGER.....

OR REMOVED ON THEIR WHIM!

ALL POSTS ARE AVAILABLE ON

MIDDLEBORO REVIEW AND SO ON

BLOGGER DOESN'T LIKE TRUTH OR FACTS!

BLOGGER DOESN'T LIKE FUND RAISERS AND DELETES

POSTS THAT INCLUDE FUNDRAISING THAT 'VIOLATES THEIR

UNDEFINED COMMUNITY STANDARDS SO ALL 'FUND RAISING'

IS DELETED - CONTRIBUTE AS YOU ARE INCLINED TO SUPPORT

IMPORTANT ISSUES! THESE ARE NOT SOLICITATIONS 


Email Header_CWV

Sponsored by The Boston Foundation

Medical Personnel, a nurse, Pushing Stretcher in Hospital Corridor
(Photo via Canva)

For the second time in two years, Massachusetts is considering whether it needs to seize hospital land by force just to get a community its health care back. In February, state legislators held a hearing on taking the Norwood Hospital property by eminent domain, the same tool the state used at St. Elizabeth’s Medical Center in Brighton at a cost of $66 million to taxpayers. For Norwood, six years into a flood-related closure that never had to happen, it remains the only option available.

That fact alone should tell us something is broken. Not because eminent domain is the wrong call for Norwood, but because a state that regulates its utilities, its transit systems, and its energy grid with layers of intermediate oversight has no equivalent tools for hospital infrastructure. When a community loses its hospital, the state can wait or it can seize. There is nothing in between. And that is the problem, because eminent domain is not a health care policy. It is what a state resorts to when it has no other tools left.

There’s a way to fill that gap. A bill before the Legislature would create receivership authority for hospitals, modeled on what Massachusetts already uses when a utility fails its customers, and would give the state a middle option between waiting and seizing.

Before the floodwaters rushed in, Norwood Hospital was a profitable community hospital serving roughly 126,000 patients a year, generating $25 million in profit, and running at 81 percent bed occupancy, well above the statewide average.

Its emergency department handled nearly 40,000 visits a year, funneling patients to a catheterization lab that anchored cardiac care for the surrounding region. Its psychiatric unit was the only inpatient behavioral health facility in the area, treating patients from more than a dozen communities with nowhere else to be admitted.

Norwood Hospital did not fail. It was failed.

The Boston Foundation is deeply committed to civic leadership, and essential to our work is the exchange of informed opinions. We are proud to partner on a platform that engages such a broad range of demographic and ideological viewpoints.

We welcome informed commentary about local, state and national public policy.

 

Have a scoop you want to share? Click below to get in touch with the CommonWealth Beacon team.

 
 
 
https://commonwealthbeacon.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/cropped-30-Year-CWB-New.png

Published by MassINC




No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.

Norwood Hospital was done in by inadequate state regulations. Here is the fix.

                                                         LOTS OF POSTS IGNORED BY BLOGGER..... OR REMOVED ON THEIR WHIM! ALL POSTS ARE AVAIL...