Waiting For Someone Else to Donate
All of our fundraising problems can be traced back to a very simple mindset, waiting for someone else to donate. It the most common approach and the least successful.
In our entire history we have never received a single dollar of funding from “someone else.” All of our funding has always come from the same source: You.
Donate, please.
Marc Ash
Founder, Reader Supported News
If you would prefer to send a check:
Reader Supported News
PO Box 2043
Citrus Hts, CA 95611
It's Live on the HomePage Now:
Reader Supported News
FOCUS: Rep. Ro Khanna | Overrule the Parliamentarian. Or End the Filibuster. Americans Need a $15 Minimum Wage.
Rep. Ro Khanna, The Washington Post
Khanna writes:
hree years ago, Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) and I introduced the Stop Bezos Act, which would have forced large companies such as Amazon to repay the federal government for subsidizing their inadequate wages. (Amazon founder and chief executive Jeff Bezos owns The Post.) Establishment fearmongers insisted that if these companies paid a higher wage, they’d have to eliminate thousands of jobs. Instead, when Amazon raised its minimum wage to $15 in response to our legislation, competitors raised their wages as well, while Amazon saw record job growth, doubled its number of employees and pushed their market cap past $1 trillion.
The country as a whole would similarly benefit if we raise the minimum wage to $15. Thirty-two million Americans make less than $15 an hour, with millions making either $7.25 or are tipped workers with only a $2.13 cash wage guaranteed. Sixty-seven percent of Americans support raising the minimum wage to $15. Sadly, because the unelected Senate parliamentarian has blocked a minimum-wage increase from the president’s covid relief package, millions of workers, disproportionately Black and Brown, may not receive a raise.
But the Senate can still pass this wage increase, notwithstanding the parliamentarian ruling. That’s why I led a letter with 22 of my colleagues urging the Biden administration to support overruling the parliamentarian. This step would not break with precedent. The vice president, acting as the Senate’s presiding officer, disregarded the parliamentarian’s ruling three times in the 1960s and 1970s. Any senator could appeal the decision, but 60 votes would be required to overrule the chair. Given this high bar, the vice president’s decision is the final say on the matter.
If the parliamentarian is not overruled, we should end the filibuster, an arcane procedural tool that President Barack Obama recently called “a Jim Crow relic.” Another path forward is for the administration to support attaching the provision to the must-pass defense bill and ensure it’s not diluted during conference. Otherwise, we could be stuck with Sen. Mitt Romney’s $10 proposal, which is both grossly inadequate and imposes a costly burden on small businesses to prove they don’t hire undocumented workers. (Ironically, Romney’s bill would push undocumented workers into the shadows and decrease their bargaining ability, further depressing wages.)
As a progressive capitalist, I believe that paying workers a higher wage is pro-growth and pro-business. With higher wages, fewer employees will work multiple jobs to pay the bills. They’ll be less exhausted at work, happier and more productive. Employee retention rates will rise. With additional money in their pockets, Americans will spend and stimulate economic growth. And Americans have more than earned this raise. If the minimum wage kept pace with productivity, those 32 million workers would make $24. Yet, employee wages have stagnated since the 1970s, while the earnings of executives skyrocketed.
Despite the experience of Amazon and others, some argue that increased wages will destroy jobs because businesses won’t be able to afford to pay their workers. The most recent studies show no evidence of this, and the few studies that have found loss of employment often relied on flawed or incomplete methods. Economist Arindrajit Dube of the University of Massachusetts at Amherst finds that even when minimum wages are at 80 percent of the median wage ($19.33 in 2019), there haven’t been negative job impacts. This was confirmed by research from University of California at Berkeley economists Anna Godoey and Michael Reich, who studied minimum wages in states that were raised to 82 percent of the country’s median wage. Finally, this proposal gives businesses five years to adjust to this change. The federal government should provide small businesses tax credits to ensure they can afford paying workers a raise.
Free-marketeers also argue we are interrupting a contract between American workers and a business by forcing this wage floor. But in many cases, monopsonies — where one employer can dominate the labor market — are at play. Workers lose their bargaining power, with few jobs to choose from, plunging their wages below the competitive market price. With the decline of unions, workers’ bargaining power is further undercut, and workers have low-wage jobs.
It’s time to reverse these trends. Nationally, we should pay everyone at least $15 an hour. This is barely enough to scrape by, regardless of your Zip code. I encourage those arguing otherwise to try to afford rent, utilities, food, child care, eldercare, car expenses, health care, school supplies and clothes on $2,400 a month before tax. It’s still not a living wage for many, especially families with children, but it is a huge lift over the terrible status quo. A $15 minimum wage is more than good politics and smart economics. We have a moral obligation to 32 million Americans to act.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.