Thursday, February 12, 2026

Top News | In Gift to Big Oil, Trump Halts EPA Fight Against ‘Most Terrible Environmental Threat in Human History’

                                                    

 LOTS OF POSTS IGNORED BY BLOGGER.....


ALL POSTS ARE AVAILABLE ON

MIDDLEBORO REVIEW AND SO ON




Thursday, February 12, 2026

■ Today's Top News 


In Gift to Big Oil Donors, Trump Stops EPA From Combating 'Most Terrible Environmental Threat in Human History'

Repealing the EPA's endangerment finding "isn’t about saving taxpayers’ money, it’s about saving an industry that has already been exposed as a permanent danger to American families," said the head of 350.org.

By Stephen Prager

In what the Sierra Club described as an act to “formalize climate denialism as official government policy,” the Trump administration announced Thursday that it has revoked the long-standing “endangerment finding” that allowed the Environmental Protection Agency to pass regulations fighting the climate crisis.

The 2009 endangerment finding determined that the emissions of carbon dioxide, methane, and other greenhouse gases posed a hazard to public health and welfare by causing the planet to warm dramatically, citing overwhelming scientific evidence, which has only grown more indisputable in the nearly two decades since.

With the US Supreme Court having ruled in 2007 that the EPA could make regulations on climate change if it were deemed a health risk, this finding served as the basis for virtually every climate-related EPA regulation under the 1970 Clean Air Act, including those limiting emissions from motor vehicles, power plants, oil and gas facilities, and other sources of pollution.

The finding has been a target of the fossil fuel industry since it was reached. Under President Donald Trump, who has boasted openly of serving the fossil fuel industry in exchange for hundreds of millions of dollars of financial support during his last election, they have found their hero.

EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin, who has enthusiastically backed Trump’s initiatives to expand oil drilling and coal mining, called the repeal of the finding “the largest deregulatory action in the history of America.”

Indeed, it is expected to immediately eviscerate fuel-efficiency standards and electric vehicle requirements for cars and trucks, which are already the largest single source of carbon dioxide emissions in the US, contributing about 1.8 billion metric tons in 2022.

While the White House has said the reduced efficiency standards will “save the American people $1.3 trillion in crushing regulations,” this is a drop in the ocean compared to the $87 trillion in economic disruption that a study by researchers at the University of Chicago and the University of Pennsylvania estimated will come over the next 25 years as a result of increased natural disasters and sea-level rise caused by American corporations’ fossil fuel outputs.

In the United States, weather disasters—exacerbated by global warming—caused $115 billion in total damages last year, the third most since tracking began in 1980, behind only 2023 and 2024. Last year had more billion-dollar disasters than any other year on record.

Anne Jellema, the executive director of the environmental group 350.org, said repealing the endangerment finding “isn’t about saving taxpayers’ money, it’s about saving an industry that has already been exposed as a permanent danger to American families.”

“While the Trump administration can manipulate scientific agencies, it can never suppress the truth that ordinary people in the US and around the world are paying the real price for Big Oil’s profits: Lives are being lost, homes are being destroyed, and costs are soaring,” she said.

The Trump administration does not have the last word on the endangerment finding. Climate groups, including Earthjustice, have already stated their intention to challenge the legality of the decision.

“The courts have repeatedly affirmed EPA’s obligation to clean up climate pollution,” said Earthjustice president Abigail Dillen. “There is no way to reconcile EPA’s decision with the law, the science, and the reality of disasters that are hitting us harder every year.”

Dillen said, “Earthjustice and our partners will see the Trump administration in court.” But it may face an uphill battle.

Though the Supreme Court laid the groundwork for the finding’s creation, the current right-wing majority has rolled back its authority in recent years, most notably in 2022, when the justices limited the EPA’s authority to impose emissions standards on power plants.

David Arkush, the director of Public Citizen’s climate program, said that “if left to stand,” the rollback of the endangerment finding “will hamstring the government’s ability to combat the most terrible environmental threat in human history, harming Americans and the world for decades to come.”

“Abundant scientific evidence supports the EPA’s prior conclusion that greenhouse gases threaten public health and welfare,” he added. “Americans feel the effects of climate change constantly, as we experience more dangerous hurricanes, furnace-like heat domes, walls of water slamming into our children’s summer camps, raging wildfires, and other extreme weather driven by greenhouse gases.”



‘What a Surprise’: Sanders Undeterred by Bezos-Owned Washington Post's Dismissal of AI Data Center Pause

“Jeff Bezos is spending $200 billion on AI and robotics. Jeff Bezos is replacing hundreds of thousands of his workers at Amazon with robots. Jeff Bezos owns the Washington Post.”

By Julia Conley

The Washington Post editorial board went to the trouble of marking what it called “Bernie Sanders’ worst idea yet” on Wednesday, but the progressive US senator shrugged at the label and didn’t appear likely to end his push for a moratorium on the construction of new artificial intelligence data centers.

The conservative-leaning editors wrote glowingly of the “mind-blowing amounts of information” that AI data centers can process and dismissively said that businesses that have invested billions of dollars in AI have erroneously been cast as the “villain in the socialist imagination.”

They decried “AI doomerism” by politicians and accused lawmakers like Sanders (I-Vt.) of “fearmongering” about the data centers’ water consumption and environmental harms—but neglected to mention that the rapid expansion of the massive centers has sparked grassroots outrage, with communities in states including Michigan and Wisconsin demanding that tech giants stay out of their towns, fearing skyrocketing electricity bills among other impacts.

Sanders emphasized that the Post and its owner, Amazon founder Jeff Bezos, have a vested interest in dismissing efforts to stop the AI build-out that President Donald Trump has demanded with his executive order aimed at stopping states from regulating the industry.

Bezos, one of the richest people on the planet, created an AI startup last year with $6.2 billion in funding, some of it from his personal fortune, and Amazon—where Bezos is still the primary shareholder—has announced plans to invest $200 billion in AI and robotics.

“What a surprise,” said Sanders sardonically. “The Washington Post doesn’t want a moratorium on AI data centers.”

Ben Inskeep, a program director for Citizens Action Coalition in Indiana, suggested the editorial board couldn’t express its opposition to Sanders’ proposal for a moratorium without including “an admission that it is a paid attack dog for Jeff Bezos,” pointing to its required disclosure that Bezos’ company is in fact investing billions of dollars in AI.

On social media, Sanders followed his response to the Post‘s attack with a video in which he doubled down on his objections to AI, despite the editorial board’s accusation that he and others “grandstand” on the issue and its insistence that he should “be ecstatic about how much AI can help workers.”

Sanders said in the video that “AI and robotics are a huge threat to the working class of this country.”

“We have got to be prepared to say as loud and clear as we can that this technology is not just going to benefit the billionaires who own it,” he said, “but it’s going to work for the working families of our country.”



Judge Blasts Hegseth Over Effort to 'Shrink the First Amendment Liberties' of Sen. Mark Kelly

"This court has all it needs to conclude that defendants have trampled on Senator Kelly's First Amendment freedoms."

By Brad Reed


A federal judge delivered a scathing ruling against Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth’s effort to punish a Democratic US senator for warning members of the military against following unlawful orders.

US District Judge Richard Leon on Thursday granted a preliminary injunction that at least temporarily blocked Hegseth from punishing Sen. Mark Kelly (D-Ariz.), a retired US Navy captain who was one of several Democratic lawmakers to take part in a video that advised military service members that they had a duty to disobey President Donald Trump if he gave them unlawful orders.

In his ruling, Leon eviscerated Hegseth’s efforts to reduce Kelly’s retirement rank and pay simply for exercising his First Amendment rights.

While Leon acknowledged that active US service members do have certain restrictions on their freedom of speech, he said that these restrictions have never been applied to retired members of the US armed services.

“This court has all it needs to conclude that defendants have trampled on Senator Kelly’s First Amendment freedoms and threatened the constitutional liberties of millions of military retirees,” wrote Leon. “To say the least, our retired veterans deserve more respect from their government, and our constitution demands they receive it!”

The judge said he would be granting Kelly’s request for an injunction because claims that his First Amendment rights were being violated were “likely to succeed on the merits,” further noting that the senator has shown “irreparable harm” being done by Hegseth’s efforts to censure him.

Leon concluded his ruling by imploring Hegseth to stop “trying to shrink the First Amendment liberties of retired service members,” and instead “reflect and be grateful for the wisdom and expertise that retired service members have brought to public discussions and debate on military matters in our nation over the past 250 years.”

Shortly after Leon’s ruling, Kelly posted a video on social media in which he highlighted the threats posed by the Trump administration’s efforts to silence dissent.

“Today, a federal court made clear that Pete Hegseth violated the Constitution when he tried to punish me for something I said,” Kelly remarked. “But this case was never just about me. This administration was sending a message to millions of retired veterans that they too can be censured or demoted just for speaking out. That’s why I couldn’t let this stand.”

Kelly went on to accuse the Trump administration of “cracking down on our rights and trying to make examples out of everyone they can.”

Leon’s ruling came less than two days after it was reported that Jeanine Pirro, a former Fox News host who is now serving as US attorney for the District of Columbia, tried to get Kelly and five other Democratic lawmakers criminally indicted on undisclosed charges before getting rejected by a DC grand jury.

According to a Wednesday report from NBC News, none of the grand jurors who heard evidence against the Democrats believed prosecutors had done enough to establish probable cause that the Democrats had committed a crime, leading to a rare unanimous rejection of an attempted federal prosecution.



‘Pure Corruption Reigns’ at Trump DOJ as Top Antitrust Official Gail Slater Ousted

"Congress needs to pass legislation in 2029 that will automatically undo all major mergers occurring under this corrupt regime," said one antitrust advocate.

By Jake Johnson


Gail Slater, once heralded as the leader of the “surging MAGA antitrust movement,” announced Thursday that she is leaving her role as the top antitrust official at the US Justice Department after repeatedly clashing with Trump administration leadership over corporate merger enforcement.

Slater said in a statement that “it is with great sadness and abiding hope that I leave my role as [assistant attorney general] for antitrust today,” but reporting indicates she was forced out. According to The Guardian, Slater was “given the option to resign or be let go.” CBS News reported that “top Trump administration officials had decided to oust” Slater and “had discussions with her shortly before she announced on social media that she was leaving the department.”

Matt Stoller, research director at the American Economic Liberties Project, said in a statement that Congress must “aggressively investigate” the circumstances surrounding Slater’s departure, noting that it came shortly before the closely watched Live Nation-Ticketmaster antitrust trial is set to begin next month.

Live Nation’s stock price jumped following Slater’s announcement, and at least one lobbyist openly celebrated the news.

Days before Slater’s apparent removal, Semafor reported that Live Nation executives and lobbyists “have been negotiating with senior DOJ officials outside the antitrust division to avert a trial over whether the company is operating an illegal monopoly that has driven up concert prices.”

“ Wall Street expects there will be a settlement to block this trial at the behest of the lobbyists who engineered this ouster,” said Stoller. “Congress needs to pass legislation in 2029 that will automatically undo all major mergers occurring under this corrupt regime, as well as breaking up companies who have their monopolization cases settled. In addition, the next Justice Department needs to organize an aggressive white-collar criminal law section to jail the lawyers, bankers, and lobbyists enabling this seeming crime spree.”

Slater’s tenure at the head of the DOJ’s antitrust division was marked by a power struggle with pro-corporate officials within—and at the top of—the department, including Attorney General Pam Bondi, a former corporate lobbyist.

Last summer, top Justice Department officials reportedly bypassed Slater and cut a sweetheart merger settlement deal with Hewlett Packard Enterprise and Juniper Networks. Weeks later, DOJ leadership removed two of Slater’s deputies for “insubordination.”

Stacy Mitchell, co-director of the Institute for Local Self-Reliance, said Thursday that Slater’s departure “is very bad news for small businesses who had hoped for some faithful enforcement of the antitrust laws against monopolies like Ticketmaster.”

“Instead, it looks like pure corruption reigns at the DOJ—pay the right people and you can freely crush your small rivals,” Mitchell added.



'What Did These Cuban Children Do to Trump?': US Embargo Blamed as Infant Mortality Soars

"Is there anything worse than a child dying of cancer when it was preventable?" asked one observer.

By Brett Wilkins

Infant mortality is on the rise in Cuba as the Trump administration tightens a decadeslong economic embargo on the island nation in hopes of toppling a socialist government that’s outlasted a dozen US presidents.

According to the United Nations Inter-Agency Group for Child Mortality Estimation, infant mortality in Cuba—which plummeted dramatically in the decades after the 1959 triumph of the Cuban Revolution—has increased from 4 to 7.4 per 1,000 live births since 2018, an 85% increase.

The rise in infant mortality comes amid a deadly surge in mosquito-borne illness, including dengue and chikungunya, that has inundated already struggling hospitals suffering shortages of staff and even basic supplies. Hospitals in Cuba—which in 2015 became the first country in the world to eliminate mother-to-child transmission of HIV and congenital syphilis—are now reliant upon donations and the black market for their needs.

The crisis is particularly dire among children with cancer. Cuba’s free healthcare system—which prioritizes the health of the people instead of industry profits, as in the United States—once boasted a pediatric cancer survival rate of 80%, on par with the world’s wealthy nations. Now that’s down to around 65% as the blockade has forced healthcare providers to modify treatment protocols and medications.

“The situation is very serious at the moment. It was already in terms of acquiring supplies and medicines. But now it is intensifying and complicated with other aspects,” Dr. Forteza Saéz, an oncologist at Havana’s University of Medical Sciences, told La Jornada in an interview on Wednesday.

Dr. Luis Curbelo Alonso, former longtime director of the National Institute of Oncology and Radiology in Havana, told La Jornada: “You have the knowledge, the expertise, the team to face something that can be curable or can be controllable and yet not have the drug. It’s a very lacerating thing as a professional, very cruel.”

The situation is also driving Cubans to extreme measures to find treatment. Two-year-old Mía Rey Jiménez and her family left their home in Cardenas, Matanzas last May weeks after the child was diagnosed with metastatic stage 4 neuroblastoma, an extremely aggressive childhood cancer requiring complex treatment.

The family left Cuba to seek treatment in Nicaragua and then Costa Rica, where Jiménez underwent chemotherapy and high-risk surgery. Still left with a tumor in her lung and cancer in her bone marrow, Jiménez’s family sought help from Nicklaus Children’s Hospital in Miami, one of the world’s leading specialized facilities.

The hospital agreed to evaluate Jiménez and estimated her chances of survival with proper care at up to 80%—more than double her prognosis in Costa Rica. However, the humanitarian visa for which Jiménez’s family applied was denied by US authorities due to what they claimed was “lack of evidence,” even though the girl’s father resides legally in the United States.

The family successfully appealed their denial and Jiménez and her mother Liudmila Jiménez Matos arrived in Miami in January.

“I can’t be happier,” Jiménez Matos told Cuba Noticias 360 last month. “My daughter will be treated by doctors who have been waiting for her for a long time. That’s a love for the profession and for saving another life.”

As President Donald Trump tightens the blockade on Cuba following a similar strangulation of Venezuela that ended with last month’s US invasion and kidnapping of Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro to face dubious “narco-terrorism” charges in the United States, critics are renewing calls to end Washington’s embargo.

Imposed in the early 1960s after a successful revolution that overthrew a brutal US-backed dictatorship and replaced it with a socialist government, the blockade—which accompanied a decadeslong campaign of terrorism by US-based Cuban exiles—has claimed thousands of Cuban lives and cost the country’s economy more than $1 trillion, according to official estimates.

The United Nations General Assembly has overwhelmingly condemned the blockade 33 times.

UN Secretary-General António Guterres warned Wednesday of a potential “collapse” of Cuba’s economy if the US keeps blocking oil from entering the country.

On Thursday, Congresswoman Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.), who visited Cuba in 2024 as part of a delegation of progressive US lawmakers, called the ramped-up embargo, which is now targeting fuel imports, as “cruel and despotic.”

Back in Havana, Cuban doctors vowed to do the best they can for their patients under the harrowing circumstances.

“We will continue to resist,” Dr. Carlos Alberto Martínez, head of the Ministry of Health’s cancer control section, told La Jornada. “We will continue to look for alternatives that allow the sustainability of what has been achieved.”



'Not an Anomaly... A Blueprint': Homan Says Minnesota ICE Surge Ending—But Mass Deportations Aren't

"Just as Minnesotans fought back, Congress must now follow suit and refuse to fund DHS agencies that enable such reckless and dangerous acts that, in some cases, have killed people in broad daylight," said one watchdog leader.

By Jessica Corbett

While people across Minnesota and beyond welcomed “border czar” Tom Homan’s Thursday announcement that “Operation Metro Surge is ending,” he also made clear that the administration’s deadly immigration operations still threaten other US communities, declaring that President Donald Trump “made a promise of mass deportation, and that’s what this country’s gonna get.”

Homan said last week that 700 agents were leaving the state, but around 2,000 would remain. However, as outrage from the public and local officials persisted, he announced Thursday that “I have proposed, and President Trump has concurred, that this surge operation conclude. A significant drawdown has already been underway this week and will continue through the next week.”

The administration’s “tactical withdrawal” came just a day after a car crash involving federal agents led Democratic Saint Paul Mayor Kaohly Her to renew her call for an immediate end to the US Department of Homeland Security (DHS) operation, which has involved officers with Customs and Border Protection (CBP) and Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) terrorizing Twin Cities residents for over two months—and even fatally shooting Renee Good and Alex Pretti in Minneapolis.

“Today’s announcement reflects what happens when communities organize, speak out, and refuse to accept fear as public policy,” said Jaylani Hussein, executive director of the Council on American-Islamic Relations’ Minnesota chapter. “This is a hard-fought community victory. But it comes after real trauma, real harm, and the loss of life. That cannot be ignored.”

“This moment belongs to the community,” Hussein added. “Faith leaders, organizers, tenants, youth, and everyday residents stood together and demanded dignity. That collective action forced change. And we will remain vigilant.”

After ICE officer Jonathan Ross killed Good, Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey told the agency to “get the fuck out” of his city. After Homan confirmed the operation is ending, the Democrat acknowledged the strong local pushback to the invasion, saying on social media that “they thought they could break us, but a love for our neighbors and a resolve to endure can outlast an occupation.”

“These patriots of Minneapolis are showing that it’s not just about resistance—standing with our neighbors is deeply American,” Frey said. “This operation has been catastrophic for our neighbors and businesses, and now it’s time for a great comeback. We will show the same commitment to our immigrant residents and endurance in this reopening, and I’m hopeful the whole country will stand with us as we move forward.”

Outgoing Democratic Gov. Tim Walz similarly said that “the long road to recovery starts now. The impact on our economy, our schools, and people’s lives won’t be reversed overnight. That work starts today.”

Minneapolis Community Safety Commissioner Todd Barnette, Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison, Congresswoman Angie Craig (D-Minn.), and US Sen. Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.) were also among the Minnesotans welcoming the development. The senator, who is running to replace Walz, said that “Minnesotans stood together, stared down ICE, and never blinked.”

Not everyone critical of the operation has been satisfied by local Democrats’ response. Progressive organizer and lawyer Aaron Regunberg said Thursday that it is “important to remember that this victory belongs 100%—literally one hundred percent—to the people of Minneapolis. Elected Dems did essentially nothing to bring this about. Our political leadership is dogshit. Everyday Americans, on the other hand, can really do amazing things.”

Maurice Mitchell, national director of the Working Families Party, said that “Minneapolis residents’ heroic resistance has resulted in this retreat. We hope the people of Minneapolis can start to heal from the monthslong siege of their city, the murder of their neighbors, and the tragedy of families ripped apart by the Trump administration.”

Mitchell pointed out that the end of the Minnesota operation comes on the eve of a likely DHS shutdown due to a funding fight in Congress, which is narrowly controlled by Republicans. Because of their slim margins and Senate rules, most bills need some Democratic support to get through the upper chamber to Trump’s desk.

“Donald Trump is trying to distract us and turn our attention away from the growing resistance in Congress to funding his campaign of cruelty and retribution,” Mitchell said, taking aim at not only the president but also his deputy chief of staff for policy, Stephen Miller, Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem, “and their cronies” who “refuse to make this agency and its criminal activities accountable to anyone.”

“Democrats are using their power by voting NO as a bloc and pledging not one dollar more in DHS funding until demands for accountability are met,” he highlighted. Various Democratic leaders have made demands for reforming the department, and specifically its immigration operations, and growing shares of the party’s caucus and the public have even called for abolishing ICE.

Progressive Democratic Congresswoman Ilhan Omar, whose district includes Minneapolis, said on social media that “ending this operation is not enough. We need justice and accountability. That starts with independent investigations into the murders of Renee Good and Alex Pretti, economic restitution for businesses impacted, abolishing ICE, and the impeachment of Kristi Noem.”

Lisa Gilbert, co-president of the watchdog group Public Citizen, said in a statement that “the people of Minnesota set the example of bravery, compassion, and strength against masked, lawless federal agents who vastly underestimated the power of community and peaceful protest.”

While calling Homan’s announcement “a crucial win,” Gilbert also noted that congressional Republicans and the president gave ICE an extra $75 billion in their so-called One Big Beautiful Bill Act last year. She stressed that Trump’s federal government “is still stripping families from their homes and throwing them into unlivable conditions in detention centers across the country in a militarized mass detention campaign. And there is no sign from the Trump administration that it plans on doing anything—including arresting and persecuting small children—differently.”

Recent reporting—including by Wired, which obtained related federal records—has revealed ICE’s ongoing expansion efforts across the country. As Wired executive editor Brian Barrett wrote Wednesday:

Its occupation of Minneapolis is not an anomaly; it’s a blueprint. Communities deserve to know that they might be next. People have a right to know who their neighbors are, especially when they amount to an invading force.

What we’ve reported so far fills in only part of the puzzle. It shows what ICE had planned as of January, not beyond. More than 100 addresses remain unknown, some of them in high-concentration states like New York and New Jersey. The specific nature of the work being done in some of these offices remains unclear, as is how long ICE plans to be there.

The need to resolve these questions is urgent as ICE continues to metastasize. At the same time, the Department of Justice has become increasingly aggressive in its dealings with journalists, and has repeatedly claimed that revealing any identifying information about ICE agents or their activities is “doxing.” In Minnesota and beyond, ICE and CBP agents have treated observers as enemies, arresting and reportedly harassing them with increased frequency. The DOJ has been quick to label any perceived interference with ICE activity as a crime.

While Barrett pledged that Wired “will continue to report on this story until we have the answers,” Gilbert argued to the public that “the victory in Minnesota should galvanize our efforts to fight these atrocities.”

“Just as Minnesotans fought back, Congress must now follow suit and refuse to fund DHS agencies that enable such reckless and dangerous acts that, in some cases, have killed people in broad daylight,” Gilbert added. “We need drastic reforms now.”


JOIN THE MOVEMENT


As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will.

Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future.

■ Opinion


Trump's ICE Goons Are Targeting Hard Workers, Our Friends, Neighbors, and Families—Not the 'Worst of the Worst'




Tributes And Anger Continue In Minneapolis
Minneapolis residents continue to pay tribute to Renee Good and Alex Pretti, both victims of fatal shootings by federal agents, and show their anger and demand that ICE leave their city. On February 9, 2026, in Minneapolis, Minnesota, protests continue calling for an end to immigration raids in the Twin Cities. 
(Photo by Jerome Gilles/NurPhoto via Getty Images)

Showing that only 14% of 400,000 people arrested by federal agents have violent criminal records, leaked figures from the Department of Homeland Security have not received the news coverage they deserve.

By Robert Reich


Trump is lying about ICE arrests. He said his deportation machine would go after only the “worst of the worst.”

According to newly leaked data from the Department of Homeland Security, less than 14 percent of the 400,000 immigrants arrested by ICE in the past year have either been charged with or convicted of violent crimes.

The vast majority of immigrants jailed by ICE have no criminal record at all. A few have previously been charged with or convicted of nonviolent offenses, such as overstaying their visas or permission to be in the country.

(In the past, alleged violations of U.S.immigration laws were normally adjudicated by Justice Department immigration judges in civil — not criminal — proceedings.)

A large proportion of the people ICE has arrested are now in jail — some 73,000 — and being held without bail. They’re in what the Department of Homeland Security calls “detention facilities.”

Many lack adequate medical attention.

The Times reported this morning that a New Jersey woman, Leqaa Kordia, who has been held at the Prairieland Detention Facility in Alvarado, Texas, for nearly a year, suffered a seizure after she fell and hit her head. She was involved in an pro-Palestinian demonstration at Columbia University in 2024 and detained for overstaying her visa, but has never been charged with a crime. A judge has twice ruled that she is not a threat to the United States.

Meanwhile, a federal judge has ordered an external monitor to oversee California’s largest immigration detention center, California City Detention Facility, citing “shockingly deficient” medical care, including cases where detainees were denied medication for serious conditions.

A 2025 U.S. Senate investigation uncovered dozens of cases of medical neglect, with instances of detainees left without care for days and others being forced to compete for clean water.

Reports from early 2026 indicate that even children in family detention centers face poor conditions, including being returned to custody after hospitalization for severe illness without receiving necessary medication.

People held in detention facilities are deprived of the most basic means of communication to connect with their lawyers and the rest of the outside world, including phones, mail, and email. Some have been split off from the rest of their families, held hundreds if not thousands of miles away from their loved ones. Some of them are children.

Many are in the United States legally, awaiting determinations about their status as refugees fleeing violence or retribution in their home countries. Or they have green cards that would normally allow them to remain in the United States. Others have been in the United States for decades as law-abiding members of their communities.

They are hardly the “worst of the worst.” Many are like our parents or grandparents or great-grandparents who came to the United States seeking better lives. We are a nation of immigrants. While this doesn’t excuse being here without proper documentation, it doesn’t justify the draconian and inhumane measures being utilized by the Trump regime.

These leaked data from the Department of Homeland Security have not received the news coverage they deserve.

Moreover, these data pertain only to ICE. They don’t include arrests by Border Patrol agents deployed by the Trump administration to places far away from the U.S.-Mexico border, such as Chicago and Minneapolis, where Border Patrol agents have undertaken aggressive and sweeping arrest operations, targeting day laborers at Home Depot parking lots and stopping people — including U.S. citizens — to question them about their immigration status.

This is a moral blight on America, a crime against humanity. As Americans, we are complicit.


Don Lemon’s Travail Is a Warning of Rising Authoritarianism; I Would Know


Television Journalist Don Lemon Arrested In Los Angeles Over Incident At Minneapolis Church

Journalist Don Lemon looks on after issuing a statement to media outside federal court on January 30, 2026 in Los Angeles, California. 

(Photo by Mario Tama/Getty Images)



My experience as a university professor in Congo demonstrates that repressive governments may go after a variety of observers sympathizing with militant protesters by purveying false or distorted reports of their actions.

By Stephen R. Weissman

Former CNN anchor Don Lemon is under federal indictment for participating in a Minnesota protest group’s obstruction of a church service. He is scheduled to be arraigned Friday. News of his prosecution took me back more than five decades to when I was a young university professor in Zaire (now the Democratic Republic of the Congo). At that time, President Mobutu Sese Seko’s government threatened to arrest me for my alleged involvement in student disruptions.

In both cases, increasingly authoritarian governments decided to clamp down on independent observers—journalists or others—who sympathized with community activists. To do so, they distorted what actually happened to serve their political interests. Yet, I suspect that the last person President Donald Trump wants to be compared to is a corrupt, fallen, disgraced African dictator.

In December 1970, my university screeched to a halt as the entire student body boycotted classes. With support from Zairian professors and staff, the students called for the replacement of the Protestant missionary rector, criticized for incompetence and racism. From afar, I sympathized with their position. One day, with the university offering no information on the conflict, I accepted an invitation to hop onto a student bus. As a curious political scientist, I hoped to learn more about what my students were thinking. Arriving at a dormitory, I found myself enveloped in a crowd slowly moving forward. Suddenly, I found myself standing before a mock coffin for the rector emblazoned, “Rest in Peace.” Reaching for humor, I tossed a vine I had picked up onto the coffin. Then I walked away, seeing no opportunity for discussion.

Encountering one of my best students on campus a day or two later, I asked him what was happening with his movement. We discussed the students’ perspective and actions. I posed questions in the style of a neutral reporter or scholar. At a certain point, he reiterated the students’ expressed belief that the rector had discouraged his better qualified, potential replacement. Out of sympathy with the student demands and wanting to equalize our exchange, I shared relevant information I had, which appeared to confirm their suspicion. In doing so, I later realized, I yielded to an impulse that deserved more scrutiny.

Whether or not Lemon is convicted, the Trump administration’s approach of pursuing individuals who can be loosely linked to disruptive demonstrations is likely to continue.

Soon, I was surprised to learn that the rector’s supporters in the university were spreading exaggerated and false versions of my involvement in the protests. I was said to have knelt before the coffin, worked to replace a Protestant rector with a Jewish one, and actively participated in students’ subsequent siege, including minor violence, of university trustees’ meeting in a private home. Declassified State Department records show that Mobutu, his minister of the interior, and the American ambassador believed these baseless reports. I was ordered to fly with my family 800 miles to the capital and report to the minister. Over 10 anxious days, I finally managed to persuade the minister that my case should be “closed.”

Last month, Don Lemon live streamed a community protest group’s disruption of a religious service in a St. Paul, Minnesota church. In the context of community resistance to Immigration and Custom Enforcement abuses, the group had discovered that one of the pastors was an important ICE official. Lemon and eight others were charged under the federal FACE Act with conspiring “to injure, oppress, threaten, and intimidate” (including chants, yelling, and physical obstruction) multiple persons in the free exercise of religion—causing termination of the service, parishioners’ flight, emergency planning, and children’s fears.

Lemon himself was accused of certain “overt acts” in and around the church:

  • Reporting on parishioners’ responses to the mayhem, including a young man crying and congregants departing, he called them understandable since the “whole point [of the operation is to disrupt;”
  • Physically obstructing, along with two other protesters, the pastor on three sides while peppering him with questions and ignoring his request to leave immediately; and
  • Physically obstructing some parishioners attempting to leave.

Some MAGA activists condemned Lemon and the others for “storming” the church and committing an anti-Christian hate crime.

Yet, a detailed examination of Lemon’s hour-long live-stream video of the event shows a far different reality. He is mainly observing and interviewing—as I was in the Congo—plus publicly reporting on what he sees. Inside the church, he tells parishioners and viewers several times that he is “chronicling and reporting” and “not part of the activists.” He interviews protesters, the pastor, and parishioners, generally seeking their views in a neutral way. Sometimes his questioning cites protesters’ grievances, but he generally does not insist upon them. It is also clear from the video that he and nearby protesters are not obstructing the pastor, nor are they preventing parishioners from leaving the church.

Like me, Lemon indicates sympathy with the protesters, invoking the history of the US civil rights movement. At one point he tells viewers—but not others—that he supports the disruption because “you have to make people uncomfortable in these times [when ICE is committing abuses during operations against illegal immigrants].” “I believe…, he declares, ”everyone has to be willing to sacrifice something.“ Only once though does he seem to depart from neutrality with a parishioner. After an interchange in which he states ICE’s excesses are powering protests and his interlocutor maintains ICE is keeping America safe, he asks the latter, ”Do you really believe that?“ Then, as the man starts to walk away, Lemon persists by trying to present him with ”facts“ that immigrants have lower crime rates than natives and most detainees were not convicted of crimes.

Lemon also presents an alternative to the conflict: He suggests to both the pastor and a parishioner that they move from confrontation to calm discussion with the protesters, for that might reveal areas of agreement.

These are however minor chords in Lemon’s overall conventional reporting style. We might consider whether, in an age of flagging journalist legitimacy, a reporter’s acknowledgement of his personal perspective amid an effort to tell a story objectively can enhance audience trust.

Either way, Lemon’s remarks did not transform him into a member of the group besieging the church any more than my two encounters with student protesters made me into a member of the group besieging the trustees.

Together these cases warn that repressive governments may go after a variety of observers sympathizing with militant protesters by purveying false or distorted reports of their actions. Whether or not Lemon is convicted, the Trump administration’s approach of pursuing individuals who can be loosely linked to disruptive demonstrations is likely to continue. Worryingly, the head of the FBI has announced investigations of “paid protest campaigns” throughout the country including “organizers, protesters, and funding sources that drive illicit activities.”



Trump's Racist Post Made Friday a Difficult Day at My School

My students weren’t angry; they were frustrated. They’d been stripped of their dignity by their own president.

By Brian Huba


US Athletes School Trump in the Olympic Spirit

When Trump attacked one of their own for speaking his mind, Olympians stood up in support of their colleague.

By Jules Boykoff




-
Labels: , , , , , , , , , ,

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Top News | In Gift to Big Oil, Trump Halts EPA Fight Against ‘Most Terrible Environmental Threat in Human History’

                                                        LOTS OF POSTS IGNORED BY BLOGGER..... ALL POSTS ARE AVAILABLE ON MIDDLEBORO  REVIEW ...