BREAKING: Trump to Designate "ANTIFA" a "Major Terrorist Organization Trump’s Fake “ANTIFA Terror Group” Is a Blank Check to Criminalize Dissent Dean Blundell Sep 18 He can’t legally designate an ideology a “terror cell”. America has no domestic terror list. So why do it? To slap a “terror” label on nonprofits, donors, and anyone who says no. This Substack is reader-supported. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. “SICK. DANGEROUS. RADICAL LEFT DISASTER.” That was the sales pitch. Then came the promise: designate “ANTIFA” as a major terrorist organization and hunt down its “funders.” It’s performative tough-guy politics wrapped around one goal: turn a slogan into a dragnet. Here’s the problem the White House won’t say out loud: ANTIFA is not an organization. There is no founder, no board, no dues, no national office, no bank account. It’s a decentralized idea—anti-fascism—claimed by loose networks of activists, affinity groups, and ad-hoc coalitions that surge and fade depending on the moment. Even federal law enforcement has described it as an ideology, not a formal group. And there’s a second, bigger problem: the United States has no legal mechanism to designate domestic organizations as “terrorist” the way it designates ISIS or al-Qaeda. Federal “terror lists” target foreign groups. The “material support” laws attach to foreign terrorist organizations. There is no domestic-terror designation button a president can press to blacklist U.S. activists, nonprofits, or donors, but he’ll try. So what’s really going on? A label without a law can still be a weapon. That’s the point. The Play: Invent a “Group,” Then Punish the People You Don’t Like If “ANTIFA” is anything anyone says it is, then everyone a president doesn’t like can be painted as “ANTIFA-adjacent.” Progressive nonprofits. Immigrant-rights coalitions. Labor unions. Campus groups. Bail funds. Media platforms. Even mainstream advocacy orgs that endorse Democrats. Call them “funders of ANTIFA,” and suddenly you’ve built a political pretext to subpoena donor lists, freeze payments temporarily, lean on banks, and intimidate platforms. The spectacle is the punishment. This is how you chill speech without passing a single new law: Investigations on loop—grandstanding hearings, subpoenas for emails and donor rosters, “voluntary” document requests to payment processors. Financial squeeze—quiet pressure on banks and processors to “reassess risk,” de-platform first and ask questions later. Public smearing—lather the airwaves with “ANTIFA funders” rhetoric to scare supporters and volunteers away. The legal footing is flimsy. The Foreign Terrorist Organization list doesn’t apply to domestic movements. The material support statute attaches to foreign groups. Executive-order sanctions were designed for international terrorism and global financiers, not domestic political opponents. And the Supreme Court has long protected associational privacy—government fishing expeditions for donor lists are the classic First Amendment red line. But while those fights play out in court, the damage is immediate: chilled speech, spooked donors, canceled events, throttled payments. Process becomes punishment. That’s the whole ballgame. What ANTIFA Actually Is (and Isn’t) Origins & structure: “Anti-fascist” organizing traces back to 20th-century Europe and pops up in the U.S. whenever fascist and white-supremacist movements surge. There’s no national leadership structure and no master funder. Local crews and coalitions show up, then disperse. Tactics & controversy: Most activity is protest, counter-protest, research on extremist networks, and online exposure of violent actors. Some adherents embrace property damage or street confrontation as “self-defense,” which is exactly the wedge authoritarians exploit to paint all dissent as violent extremism. Scale: Because there’s no membership roll, it’s impossible (and dishonest) to pretend there’s one centralized “terror organization” to designate. That vacuum is not a bug for would-be strongmen—it’s the feature that lets them paste the label on anyone. The Law (Short Version): Why This Collapses on Contact No domestic terror list. The U.S. can designate foreign terrorist organizations. It has no federal process to designate domestic groups as terrorist entities. None. Material support doesn’t fit. The famous “material support” crimes hinge on foreign designations. You can’t back-door domestic dissent into those statutes by chanting “ANTIFA” louder. Sanctions sleight of hand. Financial sanctions (the terrorism lists you hear about from Treasury) target international networks. Trying to bolt those tools onto U.S. advocacy groups for domestic protest would trigger a constitutional buzzsaw. First Amendment tripwires. Government efforts to pry into membership and donor lists run smack into associational-privacy precedents. Advocacy—even repugnant, even loud—is protected unless it crosses the line into incitement or true threats. Calling disagreement “terrorism” doesn’t erase those lines. About the Kirk Assassination—and the Stampede to Blame “The Left” Days after the killing of conservative activist Charlie Kirk, the White House and allies rushed to connect the crime to “ANTIFA.” Investigators have not established any organizational link. Reports mention anti-fascist slogans etched on shell casings—an inflammatory detail in a still-unfolding case—but an inscription is not evidence of a network. One murder investigation, however grotesquely politicized, doesn’t conjure a federal authority that doesn’t exist. Policy made by slogan is how democracies get hurt. The Reality Check on Political Violence If the government is going to reorganize civil liberties around a threat narrative, the least it owes the public is honest threat data. The long-run picture in the United States is clear: far-right violent extremism has been responsible for vastly more fatalities than far-left incidents over recent decades. That fact doesn’t excuse any left-wing violence; it demolishes the pretense that a sprawling, coordinated “ANTIFA terror network” is the central threat requiring extraordinary new powers. Authoritarians don’t need the numbers. They need the story. How the Scheme Would Work in Five Moves 🟦 1. Declare the enemy. Announce “ANTIFA” is a major terror organization—never mind that it isn’t an organization. Make “funders” the headline. 🟦 2. Demand lists. Subpoena donor and member data from nonprofits, campaigns, platforms, and processors. “Purely routine,” they’ll say. 🟦 3. Weaponize risk. Nudge banks, payment processors, hosting providers: “We’re concerned about terror financing.” Accounts get frozen, then “reviewed.” 🟦 4. Flood the zone. Hearings, pressers, leaks. Smear any target as “ANTIFA-linked” for refusing to cooperate. 🟦 5. Chill the ecosystem. Volunteers pull back. Donors hesitate. Events get canceled. Speech shrinks. Mission accomplished—without ever winning in court. What This Means for You (Yes, You) If you donate to a civil-rights group, immigrant-aid org, abortion-access fund, climate nonprofit, LGBTQ+ center, campus press, or a union strike fund—you are the target. Not because you’re violent, but because your dissent is effective. The point of the “ANTIFA” label is to make ordinary participation in civic life feel risky: Will my bank call? Will my name end up on a list? Will my kid’s school get a letter? That fear is the product they’re selling. What to Watch Next Paper trail: Do DOJ or Treasury issue any actual instrument implementing this “designation,” or is it pure podium theater? Banking pressure: Any private advisories to banks and processors about “heightened risk” tied to protest-oriented nonprofits? Hill action: Bills to create a domestic terror list or expand “material support” into domestic space. Litigation: Rapid First Amendment suits if donor lists are targeted; emergency motions if accounts get frozen. Copycat moves: State legislatures trying to pass their own “ANTIFA” designations to criminalize protest. Bottom Line You can’t legally designate an ideology as a terrorist organization. You can, however, abuse the word “terrorism” to frighten banks, platforms, and ordinary people into treating dissent as a crime. That’s the play. It’s not about ANTIFA. It’s about you—your voice, your vote, your right to stand in the town square and say no. This is how the First Amendment dies: not with a law, but with a label. Thanks for reading! This post is public so feel free to share it.